Quoted from GitHub · nothing written here

People are already using these.

Every line below was written by a real person on GitHub, in the repository the prompt, skill or agent came from — not on this site. We pulled them together so you can see the same thing we can see: which of these things people actually open their laptop and argue about. Each comment links back to the original, and each name is the author's own GitHub account.

222peopledifferent GitHub accounts — 96 of them wrote a comment, the rest opened a thread; 1 bot account is labelled below and not counted here
236comments quotedeach links back to the original; 302 mentions in total, because some name more than one listing
109threads with no replies pulledout of 255 threads — we have the title and the author, not the bodies yet
159listings discussedout of 2,398 listed here
19repositorieswhere those conversations are happening

Oldest comment 19 Aug 2025, most recent 19 Sep 2026. Every number on this page is counted from the data at build time — if they ever get smaller, that is the data getting smaller, not a rounding choice.

Who they are

96 people have left at least one comment · the number beside each name is how many

And 194 more — mostly people who opened a thread rather than replied in one. GitHub gives us their username but not their picture in that data, and we are not going to invent one.

Most talked about

ranked by how many different people turned up

Everything they said

newest first · every name and every link is real

236 comments and 109 thread titles, newest first.

Reproduced this. Root cause: src/sequentialthinking/lib.ts:63 — `if (!this.branches[input.branchId])` reads a truthy inherited Object.prototype member instead of an own array, so line 66 calls `.push` on a non-array, while line 60 has already appended the… read the rest on GitHub

sequentialthinking: a branchId that collides with an Object.prototype key throws instead of creating the branch, and the failed call still extends thoughtHistor

Thanks — that narrows it usefully, and the point about the default path is the one I'd underline too. The measurement in the report was taken in exactly that configuration: two servers, one file, nothing special set. The `parity: even(procA)=0 odd(procB)=10`… read the rest on GitHub

memory: two server processes sharing MEMORY_FILE_PATH silently discard each other's writes (the #4555 mutex is per-process)

That wrinkle is a crucial addition. You’re right that a silent skip is worse than a false negative because it destroys the audit trail entirely. In my own tools, I’ve found that the "absence of a calibrated instrument" needs to be an explicit error state, not… read the rest on GitHub

verification-before-completion: the skill requires fresh evidence but never asks where the evidence came from

Independent hit on failure mode 2, from a different domain — and with a wrinkle I think is worth adding to the proposed rule. I was building a static audit tool for the assembled system prompts of a multi-component LLM app. One check listed behaviours the… read the rest on GitHub

verification-before-completion: the skill requires fresh evidence but never asks where the evidence came from

This failure mode where the agent’s own instrumentation pollutes the evidence log is exactly the kind of self-consistency trap we see in quantum error correction, where local readouts can sometimes mask global decoherence. Have you considered adding a… read the rest on GitHub

verification-before-completion: the skill requires fresh evidence but never asks where the evidence came from

Maintainer-authored is the right route as far as we're concerned — we're not preparing a skill-text patch, and this issue is best read as reference material for whoever does (thanks for the pointer to #2145; that policy makes sense for text this tuned, and… read the rest on GitHub

verification-before-completion: a distilled set of instrument-failure classes the gate doesn't yet name (positive controls, reported≠verified, coverage by surfa

Related maintainer guidance on #2145 says deliberately tuned skill wording lands maintainer-authored with eval gating, and #614 already covers part of the reported-versus-verified territory. Should this proposal follow that same maintainer-authored route, or… read the rest on GitHub

verification-before-completion: a distilled set of instrument-failure classes the gate doesn't yet name (positive controls, reported≠verified, coverage by surfa

环境 - 执行器:Claude Code v2.1.162(Claude Opus 4.8) - 审稿/头脑风暴:GPT-5.5,通过 Codex MCP(`claude mcp add codex -s user -- codex mcp-server`) - Codex CLI:0.135.0(`codex --version`) - Codex 桌面应用:26.527.31326 - ARIS 版本:最新 main 分支(已包含 #284 的 `allowed-tools` 修复) -… read the rest on GitHub

/idea-creator 跳过子 skill 调用(allowed-tools 缺少 `Skill`?),直接自己生成内容

感谢非常扎实的排查 🙏 逐条回答: 1. `allowed-tools` 缺 `Skill` —— 你抓到了一个真 bug(部分遗漏),已修 确认:`/idea-creator` 的 body 在三处明确指示调用其它 skill——Phase 4.2 "Run the `/novelty-check` workflow"、Phase 5.2 "Use `/run-experiment`"、Phase 5.3 "Use `/monitor-experiment`"——但 `allowed-tools` 没有… read the rest on GitHub

/idea-creator 跳过子 skill 调用(allowed-tools 缺少 `Skill`?),直接自己生成内容

Done — fixed in 7f0f632. Replaced the stale GPT-5.4 prose with gpt-5.5 in the 17 skills that had only stale mentions, and preserved the 9 intentional ones exactly as you flagged (oracle-pro `gpt-5.4-pro`, the explicit legacy-fallback options, plus one dated… read the rest on GitHub

docs: stale "GPT-5.4" references in skill prose while REVIEWER_MODEL is already gpt-5.5

Closing — the skill request template wasn't filled in. If you'd like to propose a skill, please open a new issue using the Skill Request template with: skill name, what it should do, trigger phrases, and example use cases. See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidance.

Skill Request: niche suggestion
TKassis24 Feb 2026on PymatgenSkill

Hi @ajain-lila thanks for pointing that out! We rely heavily on the expert community to polish these skills. Please go ahead and implement the fix and we'll merge it into the main code.

Pymatgen skill has errro

Nobody has commented on a prompt yet, in any of the 380 listed here. They come from collections where the discussion is about the whole collection, not about one prompt, so there is nothing per-prompt to quote. When there is, it shows up here on its own.

Threads we have not pulled the replies for

109 threads · title and author only, because the GitHub API gives us 60 requests an hour
javascript-testing-patternssamyilias·0 replies on GitHub·18 Sep 2026·on Javascript testing patternsSkill
Changes for readme as per new UI Changespradeepbaliga·1 reply on GitHub·12 Sep 2026·on LinkedIn Marketing SkillsSkill
Wayfinder's ticket types have no slot for knowledge a third person holdsdavevangelderen·0 replies on GitHub·15 Aug 2026·on To questionnaireSkill
brainstorming: explicit goal-setting step before designobra·0 replies on GitHub·12 Aug 2026·on Writing skillsSkill
Codex marketplace package drops executable bits on SDD helper scriptsmichaelholcomb-creator·2 replies on GitHub·25 Jul 2026·on Subagent driven developmentSkill
Submit MCP server: funraise-mcpsanjibani·1 reply on GitHub·13 Jul 2026·on Time MCP ServerAgent
Add a quick hosted try link for competitor-intel?kinhunt·0 replies on GitHub·5 Jul 2026·on Competitor IntelligenceSkill
Useful cold email follow-up pattern from real testingSnake-was-here·0 replies on GitHub·28 May 2026·on Cold Email WritingSkill
Add: product-manager-skills (12-domain PM operator skill)Digidai·1 reply on GitHub·24 May 2026·on Product managerAgent
Question about "About the author" sectionshiv19·0 replies on GitHub·22 May 2026·on Refactoring Patterns FrameworkSkill
Add security-auditor subagent powered by MCPWatchlazymac2x·0 replies on GitHub·11 Apr 2026·on Security auditorAgent
cpp-pro skill miss some file.majestichou·0 replies on GitHub·12 Mar 2026·on Cpp proAgent
add open-notebook skillsrenato-umeton·0 replies on GitHub·23 Feb 2026·on Open notebookSkill
agents name duplicatedoMySelfZy·1 reply on GitHub·8 Nov 2025·on Wordpress masterAgent
MCP tool descriptions appear incorrectthoraxe·0 replies on GitHub·30 Aug 2025·on Performance engineerAgent+Python proAgent

No unread threads for prompts either.

What this page is not