Verification before completion: Claude shows evidence before it says done

Verification before completion is a free Claude skill by obra, part of the Superpowers collection. Before Claude claims work is complete, fixed or passing, it has to name the command that proves it, run it in full, read the output and exit code, and only then report. Words like should and probably are red flags.
--- name: verification-before-completion description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always --- # Verification Before Completion ## Overview **Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always. **Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.** ## The Iron Law ``` NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE ```
Overview
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Code
npx skills add obra/superpowers --skill verification-before-completion -g -a claude-codeClaude Code (manual)
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/obra/superpowers/tar.gz/5bf4e7801107 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 superpowers-5bf4e7801107/skills/verification-before-completionWindows (PowerShell)
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/2188bcf042c4149c4bd5/verification-before-completion.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\verification-before-completion.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\verification-before-completion.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceClaude.ai / desktop
Codex, Cursor, other agents
Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md3.6 KB
Read the files here
obra/
SKILL.md
Show the full text121 lines
Verification Before Completion
Overview
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Key Patterns
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
When To Apply
ALWAYS before:
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
Rule applies to:
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
| 1 | |
| 2 | name verification-before-completion |
| 3 | description Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Verification Before Completion |
| 7 | |
| 8 | ## Overview |
| 9 | |
| 10 | **Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | **Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.** |
| 13 | |
| 14 | ## The Iron Law |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | ## The Gate Function |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction: |
| 26 | |
| 27 | 1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim? |
| 28 | 2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete) |
| 29 | 3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures |
| 30 | 4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim? |
| 31 | - If NO: State actual status with evidence |
| 32 | - If YES: State claim WITH evidence |
| 33 | 5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim |
| 34 | |
| 35 | Skip any step = lying, not verifying |
| 36 | |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ## Common Failures |
| 39 | |
| 40 | | Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |
| 41 | |-------|----------|----------------| |
| 42 | | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | |
| 43 | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | |
| 44 | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | |
| 45 | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | |
| 46 | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | |
| 47 | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | |
| 48 | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing | |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ## Red Flags - STOP |
| 51 | |
| 52 | Using "should", "probably", "seems to" |
| 53 | Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.) |
| 54 | About to commit/push/PR without verification |
| 55 | Trusting agent success reports |
| 56 | Relying on partial verification |
| 57 | Thinking "just this once" |
| 58 | Tired and wanting work over |
| 59 | **ANY wording implying success without having run verification** |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ## Rationalization Prevention |
| 62 | |
| 63 | | Excuse | Reality | |
| 64 | |--------|---------| |
| 65 | | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | |
| 66 | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | |
| 67 | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | |
| 68 | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | |
| 69 | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | |
| 70 | | "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse | |
| 71 | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | |
| 72 | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter | |
| 73 | |
| 74 | ## Key Patterns |
| 75 | |
| 76 | **Tests:** |
| 77 | |
| 78 | ✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" |
| 79 | ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct" |
| 80 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | **Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):** |
| 83 | |
| 84 | ✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass) |
| 85 | ❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification) |
| 86 | |
| 87 | |
| 88 | **Build:** |
| 89 | |
| 90 | ✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes" |
| 91 | ❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation) |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | **Requirements:** |
| 95 | |
| 96 | ✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion |
| 97 | ❌ "Tests pass, phase complete" |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 100 | **Agent delegation:** |
| 101 | |
| 102 | ✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state |
| 103 | ❌ Trust agent report |
| 104 | |
| 105 | |
| 106 | ## When To Apply |
| 107 | |
| 108 | **ALWAYS before:** |
| 109 | ANY variation of success/completion claims |
| 110 | ANY expression of satisfaction |
| 111 | ANY positive statement about work state |
| 112 | Committing, PR creation, task completion |
| 113 | Moving to next task |
| 114 | Delegating to agents |
| 115 | |
| 116 | **Rule applies to:** |
| 117 | Exact phrases |
| 118 | Paraphrases and synonyms |
| 119 | Implications of success |
| 120 | ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness |
| 121 |
Details
- Updated
- Sep 20, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 289,792
- Checked
- Source
- obra/superpowers ↗
- Creator
- obra · 14 listings
Similar skills
See all →
MCPExpert debugging specialist for errors, test failuresDebugger Agent
SkillEncountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behaviorSystematic debugging
SkillGuides systematic root-cause debuggingDebugging and error recovery
SkillMaster systematic debugging techniques, profiling toolsDebugging strategies
SkillMaster error handling patterns across languages including
SkillCreate structured incident response runbooksIncident runbook templatesMore from obra
SkillBrainstorms ideas into designs before any creative workBrainstorming Ideas Into Designs
SkillRequires technical rigor and verificationCode Review Reception
SkillDispatches parallel agentsDispatching parallel agents
SkillExecutes plans with review checkpointsExecuting plans
SkillFinishes a development branchFinishing a development branch
SkillRequests code review before mergingRequesting code review