Write a structured grant proposal or funding application
Grant Proposal Skill

Write a structured grant proposal or funding application for any grant type. Use when asked to write a grant proposal, funding application, research grant, charitable grant, or innovation fund application.
--- name: grant-proposal description: "Write a structured grant proposal or funding application for any grant type. Use when asked to write a grant proposal, funding application, research grant, charitable grant, or innovation fund application. Produces a complete proposal with project summary, rationale, methodology, impact, and budget narrative." --- # Grant Proposal Skill Produces structured grant proposals tailored to the funder priorities — the most common reason grants fail is writing about what you want to do rather than what the funder wants to fund. ## Required Inputs - **Funder name and grant programme** - **Grant amount sought** - **Project description** (rough notes are fine) - **Your organisation** (type, track record, capacity) - **Funder stated priorities** (copy from their guidance — essential) - **Word or page limits** - **Deadline**
Overview
Produces structured grant proposals tailored to the funder priorities — the most common reason grants fail is writing about what you want to do rather than what the funder wants to fund.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill grant-proposal -g -a claude-codemkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/grant-proposalNew-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/df1e2450a0f53de8b010/grant-proposal.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\grant-proposal.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\grant-proposal.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md4.3 KB
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/
Show the full text111 lines
Grant Proposal Skill
Produces structured grant proposals tailored to the funder priorities — the most common reason grants fail is writing about what you want to do rather than what the funder wants to fund.
Required Inputs
- Funder name and grant programme
- Grant amount sought
- Project description (rough notes are fine)
- Your organisation (type, track record, capacity)
- Funder stated priorities (copy from their guidance — essential)
- Word or page limits
- Deadline
Output Structure
Project Title
[Informative and memorable. Should convey the problem being solved and the approach.]
1. Project Summary / Abstract (200-300 words — written last, placed first)
[What you will do, why it matters, who will benefit, measurable outcomes. Every sentence earns its place.]
2. Problem Statement / Need
- The problem: [Specific, evidenced — use data]
- Who is affected: [Population, scale, geography]
- Current situation: [What exists and why it is insufficient]
- Consequence of inaction: [What happens if not funded]
- Why your organisation: [Track record, relationships, expertise]
Funder test: does this problem align with [funder] stated priorities? Make the connection explicit.
3. Project Objectives
3-5 SMART objectives:
- Objective 1: [Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound]
4. Methodology / Approach
Phase 1: [Name] (Months 1-X) [What will happen, who will do it, what is produced]
Key activities:
- [Activity — specific]
What makes this approach innovative or effective: [Why this over alternatives]
5. Impact and Outcomes
| Level | Description | Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Output | [Tangible deliverable] | [How counted] |
| Short-term outcome | [Immediate change] | [How measured] |
| Medium-term outcome | [Behaviour change] | [How measured] |
| Long-term impact | [Systemic change] | [How evidenced] |
Direct beneficiaries: [Who and how many] Sustainability: [How work continues beyond grant period]
6. Evaluation Plan
- Who evaluates, how, when, what is measured, how findings are shared
7. Budget Narrative
| Budget line | Amount | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Staff costs | £[amount] | [Role, % FTE, duration, salary] |
| Travel | £[amount] | [Specific journeys named] |
| Equipment | £[amount] | [Itemised] |
| Indirect costs | £[amount] | [[X]% of direct — check policy] |
| Total | £[total] |
Value for money: [Cost per beneficiary. What could not be done without this grant]
8. Organisational Capacity
[Track record of similar projects, governance, financial management. Name previous grants and outputs — be specific]
9. Risk Register
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Specific mitigation] |
Quality Checks
- Every section explicitly references funder stated priorities (not just generic language)
- Problem statement includes specific data, not just assertions
- Objectives are SMART (measurable and time-bound)
- Budget narrative justifies every line with specific detail
- Sustainability section explains what happens after the grant ends
- Word limits respected
Anti-Patterns
- Do not write a generic proposal — every section must be tailored to the specific funder's stated priorities
- Do not exceed the specified word or page limits — over-length proposals are disqualified at many funders
- Do not leave the sustainability section vague — funders need to know what happens after grant funding ends
- Do not use jargon the funder's reviewers won't understand — write for the panel, not the project team
- Do not underspecify the budget narrative — every significant line item must be justified with method and reasoning
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Write a grant proposal for [project] applying to [funder]"
- "Help me write a funding application for [grant programme]"
- "Turn these project notes into a grant proposal: [paste]"
| 1 | |
| 2 | name grant-proposal |
| 3 | description "Write a structured grant proposal or funding application for any grant type. Use when asked to write a grant proposal, funding application, research grant, charitable grant, or innovation fund application. Produces a complete proposal with project summary, rationale, methodology, impact, and budget narrative." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Grant Proposal Skill |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Produces structured grant proposals tailored to the funder priorities — the most common reason grants fail is writing about what you want to do rather than what the funder wants to fund. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## Required Inputs |
| 11 | **Funder name and grant programme** |
| 12 | **Grant amount sought** |
| 13 | **Project description** (rough notes are fine) |
| 14 | **Your organisation** (type, track record, capacity) |
| 15 | **Funder stated priorities** (copy from their guidance — essential) |
| 16 | **Word or page limits** |
| 17 | **Deadline** |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ## Output Structure |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | ### Project Title |
| 24 | [Informative and memorable. Should convey the problem being solved and the approach.] |
| 25 | |
| 26 | ### 1. Project Summary / Abstract (200-300 words — written last, placed first) |
| 27 | [What you will do, why it matters, who will benefit, measurable outcomes. Every sentence earns its place.] |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ### 2. Problem Statement / Need |
| 30 | **The problem:** [Specific, evidenced — use data] |
| 31 | **Who is affected:** [Population, scale, geography] |
| 32 | **Current situation:** [What exists and why it is insufficient] |
| 33 | **Consequence of inaction:** [What happens if not funded] |
| 34 | **Why your organisation:** [Track record, relationships, expertise] |
| 35 | |
| 36 | Funder test: does this problem align with [funder] stated priorities? Make the connection explicit. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ### 3. Project Objectives |
| 39 | 3-5 SMART objectives: |
| 40 | **Objective 1:** [Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound] |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ### 4. Methodology / Approach |
| 43 | |
| 44 | **Phase 1: [Name]** (Months 1-X) |
| 45 | [What will happen, who will do it, what is produced] |
| 46 | |
| 47 | **Key activities:** |
| 48 | [Activity — specific] |
| 49 | |
| 50 | **What makes this approach innovative or effective:** [Why this over alternatives] |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### 5. Impact and Outcomes |
| 53 | |
| 54 | | Level | Description | Measure | |
| 55 | |---|---|---| |
| 56 | | Output | [Tangible deliverable] | [How counted] | |
| 57 | | Short-term outcome | [Immediate change] | [How measured] | |
| 58 | | Medium-term outcome | [Behaviour change] | [How measured] | |
| 59 | | Long-term impact | [Systemic change] | [How evidenced] | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | **Direct beneficiaries:** [Who and how many] |
| 62 | **Sustainability:** [How work continues beyond grant period] |
| 63 | |
| 64 | ### 6. Evaluation Plan |
| 65 | Who evaluates, how, when, what is measured, how findings are shared |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ### 7. Budget Narrative |
| 68 | |
| 69 | | Budget line | Amount | Justification | |
| 70 | |---|---|---| |
| 71 | | Staff costs | £[amount] | [Role, % FTE, duration, salary] | |
| 72 | | Travel | £[amount] | [Specific journeys named] | |
| 73 | | Equipment | £[amount] | [Itemised] | |
| 74 | | Indirect costs | £[amount] | [[X]% of direct — check policy] | |
| 75 | | **Total** | **£[total]** | | |
| 76 | |
| 77 | **Value for money:** [Cost per beneficiary. What could not be done without this grant] |
| 78 | |
| 79 | ### 8. Organisational Capacity |
| 80 | [Track record of similar projects, governance, financial management. Name previous grants and outputs — be specific] |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ### 9. Risk Register |
| 83 | |
| 84 | | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |
| 85 | |---|---|---|---| |
| 86 | | [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Specific mitigation] | |
| 87 | |
| 88 | |
| 89 | |
| 90 | ## Quality Checks |
| 91 | |
| 92 | [ ] Every section explicitly references funder stated priorities (not just generic language) |
| 93 | [ ] Problem statement includes specific data, not just assertions |
| 94 | [ ] Objectives are SMART (measurable and time-bound) |
| 95 | [ ] Budget narrative justifies every line with specific detail |
| 96 | [ ] Sustainability section explains what happens after the grant ends |
| 97 | [ ] Word limits respected |
| 98 | |
| 99 | ## Anti-Patterns |
| 100 | |
| 101 | [ ] Do not write a generic proposal — every section must be tailored to the specific funder's stated priorities |
| 102 | [ ] Do not exceed the specified word or page limits — over-length proposals are disqualified at many funders |
| 103 | [ ] Do not leave the sustainability section vague — funders need to know what happens after grant funding ends |
| 104 | [ ] Do not use jargon the funder's reviewers won't understand — write for the panel, not the project team |
| 105 | [ ] Do not underspecify the budget narrative — every significant line item must be justified with method and reasoning |
| 106 | |
| 107 | ## Example Trigger Phrases |
| 108 | "Write a grant proposal for [project] applying to [funder]" |
| 109 | "Help me write a funding application for [grant programme]" |
| 110 | "Turn these project notes into a grant proposal: [paste]" |
| 111 |
Details
- Updated
- Sep 23, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 1,395
- Checked
- Source
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
- Creator
- mohitagw15856 · 193 listings
Made with grant-proposal


Similar skills
See all →
SkillImprove academic paper writing quality for ML/CV/NLP-styleResearch paper writing
PromptAct as a senior research paper evaluator
PromptAssist users in drafting and reviewing bibliographicBibliographic review writing assistant
SkillComprehensive citation management for academic research
SkillWeb toolkit powered by ExaExa Web Toolkit
SkillCreate professional research posters in LaTeXLaTeX Research PostersMore from mohitagw15856
SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skill
SkillDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product featuresA/B Test Planner Skill
SkillGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklistAccessibility Audit Skill
SkillBuild a structured account plan for any key customerAccount Plan Skill
SkillOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization so AIAEO Optimizer Skill
SkillConduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML featureAI Ethics Review Skill