New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Build a customer journey map for a product, service

Customer Journey Map Skill

by mohitagw15856 · MIT license · ★ 1,395 on GitHub · updated Sep 23

Customer Journey Map Skill cover

Build a customer journey map for a product, service, or experience. Use when asked to map a customer journey, create a user journey, document touchpoints and pain points, or design an experience map.

---
name: customer-journey-map
description: "Build a customer journey map for a product, service, or experience. Use when asked to map a customer journey, create a user journey, document touchpoints and pain points, or design an experience map. Produces a complete journey map with stages, touchpoints, emotions, pain points, and prioritised opportunities."
---

# Customer Journey Map Skill

This skill produces a complete customer journey map covering every stage from awareness through advocacy. Each stage includes touchpoints, customer actions, emotions, pain points, and specific improvement opportunities. Output is ready for use in product discovery, UX design, or cross-functional alignment workshops.

## Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:
- **Product or service** being mapped
- **Customer persona** — which customer segment is this map for? (be specific — one persona per map)
- **Journey scope** — full end-to-end (awareness → advocacy), or a specific phase (e.g. onboarding only)?
- **Current state or future state?** — mapping how it works today, or designing how it should work?
- **Data sources** — any research, user interviews, support tickets, NPS comments, analytics available?
- **Goal of the map** — what decision will this inform? (redesign, prioritisation, stakeholder alignment, new feature)

Overview

This skill produces a complete customer journey map covering every stage from awareness through advocacy. Each stage includes touchpoints, customer actions, emotions, pain points, and specific improvement opportunities. Output is ready for use in product discovery, UX design, or cross-functional alignment workshops.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill customer-journey-map -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/customer-journey-map
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/545897304b250db8a9e3/customer-journey-map.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\customer-journey-map.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\customer-journey-map.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md13.6 KB
  • references/2 files · 14.8 KB
  • templates/1 file · 973 B
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/f6ca7934 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text242 lines

Customer Journey Map Skill

This skill produces a complete customer journey map covering every stage from awareness through advocacy. Each stage includes touchpoints, customer actions, emotions, pain points, and specific improvement opportunities. Output is ready for use in product discovery, UX design, or cross-functional alignment workshops.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Product or service being mapped
  • Customer persona — which customer segment is this map for? (be specific — one persona per map)
  • Journey scope — full end-to-end (awareness → advocacy), or a specific phase (e.g. onboarding only)?
  • Current state or future state? — mapping how it works today, or designing how it should work?
  • Data sources — any research, user interviews, support tickets, NPS comments, analytics available?
  • Goal of the map — what decision will this inform? (redesign, prioritisation, stakeholder alignment, new feature)

Output Structure


Customer Journey Map: [Product / Service]

Persona: [Name — e.g. "Sarah, the overwhelmed HR manager"] Journey scope: [Full end-to-end / Onboarding / Purchase / Renewal] Current or future state: [Current state / Desired future state] Prepared by: [Name / Team] Date: [Date] Based on: [Research sources — interviews, analytics, support data, assumed/hypothetical]


Persona Summary

Name [Sarah]
Role [HR Manager at a 200-person professional services firm]
Goal [Reduce time spent on manual employee data management]
Frustrations [Too many tools that don't talk to each other; always chasing approvals]
Tech comfort [Moderate — comfortable with SaaS tools but not a power user]
Decision power [Recommends tools; budget approved by CHRO]

Journey Overview

AWARENESS → CONSIDERATION → DECISION → ONBOARDING → ADOPTION → ADVOCACY
   [Stage 1]      [Stage 2]      [Stage 3]    [Stage 4]     [Stage 5]   [Stage 6]

Overall experience rating (current state): [😤 Frustrating / 😐 Neutral / 😊 Positive]


Stage 1: Awareness

How does the customer first discover the product exists?

Customer goal at this stage: [e.g. Realise they have a problem worth solving — or find a solution to a specific pain]

Element Detail
Trigger [What event makes them start looking? — e.g. Manual process breaks down / peer recommendation / saw ad]
Where they are [Google search / LinkedIn / conference / colleague conversation / email newsletter]
What they do [e.g. Searches "automate employee onboarding" / asks peers in HR community / clicks LinkedIn ad]
Emotion [😤 Frustrated — overwhelmed by manual processes and hoping for a better way]
Pain points [Overwhelming number of options / hard to know which tools are credible / can't tell what's B2B vs B2C from homepage]
Opportunities [SEO content targeting the trigger keyword / LinkedIn thought leadership / peer community presence]

Stage 2: Consideration

The customer is actively evaluating options. What do they do to decide?

Element Detail
Customer goal [Narrow down from many options to a shortlist of 2–3]
What they do [Reads G2/Capterra reviews / watches demo video / downloads comparison guide / asks peers who use something similar]
Touchpoints [Website / review sites / social proof / demo request flow / sales email]
Emotion [😕 Anxious — worried about making the wrong choice; past tool purchases haven't delivered]
Pain points [Pricing not visible on website / demo requires a call before seeing the product / unclear if it works with their existing stack]
Opportunities [Self-serve demo or interactive product tour / transparent pricing page / ROI calculator / case studies from similar company size]

Stage 3: Decision

The customer is ready to buy — or not. What makes them commit?

Element Detail
Customer goal [Get sign-off from CHRO and justify the decision with a business case]
What they do [Books sales call / requests security questionnaire / builds internal business case / negotiates contract]
Touchpoints [AE / sales call / security review / contract / procurement process]
Emotion [😬 Cautious — doesn't want to be wrong; presenting to leadership adds pressure]
Pain points [Sales process is slow / security questionnaire takes weeks / contract terms are non-standard and require legal]
Opportunities [Security FAQ self-serve / standard contract with predictable terms / champion toolkit (slides, business case template) to help them sell internally]

Stage 4: Onboarding

The customer has bought. Now they need to get value fast.

Element Detail
Customer goal [Get the product working and show their CHRO it was a good decision]
What they do [Receives welcome email / attends kickoff call / configures integrations / invites team]
Touchpoints [Onboarding email sequence / in-product onboarding checklist / CSM / help centre / integrations marketplace]
Emotion [😬 Anxious but hopeful — excited about potential but stressed about the setup work]
Pain points [Setup is more complex than expected / IT required for SSO but IT is slow to respond / generic onboarding doesn't match their use case]
Opportunities [Role-specific onboarding paths / IT connector with pre-filled request template / quick win email at day 3 (show them one thing that already works)]

Key moment of truth: [What single moment in this stage determines whether they'll become an active user or ghost? — e.g. "First time the product saves them 30 minutes on a task they used to do manually"]


Stage 5: Adoption

The customer is using the product. Are they getting consistent value?

Element Detail
Customer goal [Make the product a regular part of their workflow; demonstrate ROI to leadership]
What they do [Uses core features daily / discovers new features / hits a limitation / contacts support / attends webinar]
Touchpoints [Product UI / in-app notifications / email / support / community / customer success manager]
Emotion [Variable — some days 😊 when the product works well; some days 😤 when hitting a gap or bug]
Pain points [Feature they expected isn't there / reporting doesn't show the metric leadership wants / power features are too complex / feels like they're underutilising what they're paying for]
Opportunities [Proactive CSM check-in at day 30 / in-product feature discovery / usage dashboard for the customer to see their own ROI / community for peer learning]

Adoption health indicators:

  • [DAU/MAU ratio — what does healthy look like?]
  • [Feature X used by Y% of seats within Z weeks]
  • [First NPS survey at 60 days — target score]

Stage 6: Advocacy

The customer loves the product. How do you turn them into a referral engine?

Element Detail
Customer goal [Solve problems faster; feel like an expert; feel valued as a customer]
What they do [Refers a peer / writes a G2 review / participates in case study / speaks at event / becomes a power user / joins community]
Touchpoints [CSM / community / review request email / referral programme / case study outreach / conference sponsorship]
Emotion [😊 Proud — the tool is part of their professional identity; they feel smart for choosing it]
Pain points [Referral programme is clunky / no structured way to connect with peers / case study process is slow and effortful for them]
Opportunities [One-click G2 review request at high-satisfaction moment / peer community / referral programme with meaningful reward / case study process that does most of the work for them]

Emotion Curve

Plot the customer's emotional experience across the journey:

High  😊 │        *                              *          *
          │                                   *
Neutral 😐│  *         *
          │                  *
Low   😤 │                        *    *
          └────────────────────────────────────────────────────
            Aware   Consider  Decide  Onboard  Adopt   Advocate

Lowest point: [Which stage has the worst experience — and why?] Highest point: [When is the customer most delighted — what drove it?] Biggest drop: [Where does sentiment fall most sharply — this is usually the biggest opportunity]


Prioritised Opportunities

Opportunity Stage Impact on customer Effort to fix Priority
[Self-serve product tour before sales call] Consideration [High — removes top buying barrier] [Medium] P1
[Quick win email at day 3] Onboarding [High — builds early habit] [Low] P1
[IT SSO setup template] Onboarding [Medium — removes specific blocker] [Low] P2
[30-day proactive CSM check-in] Adoption [Medium — catches churn signals early] [Medium] P2
[Peer referral programme] Advocacy [High for growth — reduces CAC] [High] P3

What We Don't Know (Research Gaps)

Gap How to close it Priority
[What actually triggers the decision to start looking?] [5 JTBD interviews with recent buyers] [High]
[What causes customers to stall in onboarding?] [Drop-off analysis in onboarding funnel + 3 interviews with churned customers] [High]
[What % of customers have reached the advocacy stage?] [Product analytics — identify power users; NPS by cohort] [Medium]

Deeper Materials

This skill ships with support files — use them when they are available:

  • references/evidence-based-mapping.md — Journey Maps Built on Evidence (Not Conference-Room Fiction). Apply it while producing the output; it carries the calibration and judgment calls the method summary above compresses.
  • templates/journey-canvas.md — a fill-in version of the deliverable with the quality gates inline. Offer it when the user wants to work the document themselves rather than have it generated.

Scoring Rubric (0–40)

Score any output of this skill before handing it over; 32+ is ship-quality.

Dimension 0 5 10
Persona specificity "All customers" or a demographic sketch that could be anyone; touchpoints generic to any product One persona named but thin — goals and frustrations could apply to any buyer in the category One vivid persona with role, goal, frustrations, and decision power; every touchpoint and pain point is recognisably this product and this person
Evidence grounding Map is conference-room fiction — no data sources cited, pain points invented Some sources named but pain points not traced to them; assumed sections not distinguished from researched ones Sources listed in the header, key pain points tied to specific data (ticket categories, survey %, interview quotes), assumed stages labelled, and a research-gaps table covering the claims the recommendations lean on
Emotional truthfulness No emotional layer — a process flow wearing a journey map's clothes Emotions listed per stage but the curve is aspirationally smooth; lowest point unnamed or softened Emotion at every stage, a curve with a real low, and the lowest point / biggest drop named with evidence — including customer pain that conflicts with an internal team's metric
Opportunity actionability Opportunities missing, unranked, or platitudes ("improve onboarding") Opportunities listed but vague, or ranked without impact/effort reasoning; not weighted toward the worst friction Every opportunity written as a backlog-ready item, ranked by impact and effort, with P1s targeting the highest-friction moment the curve identified

Quality Checks

  • Map covers one specific persona — not "all customers"
  • Each stage includes the customer's emotional state — not just actions
  • Pain points are the customer's pain — not the company's pain
  • Opportunities are specific enough to become backlog items or design prompts
  • Emotion curve shows the real experience — not an aspirationally positive version
  • Research gaps are documented — the map reflects what is known, not assumed

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not build the map from assumptions alone — ground at least the pain points in real customer data or research
  • Do not treat all journey stages as equally weighted — identify the highest-friction moments explicitly
  • Do not omit the emotional layer — a journey map without emotions is a process flow, not a customer map
  • Do not create generic touchpoints that apply to any product — each touchpoint must be specific to this product and customer
  • Do not leave opportunities unranked — prioritise by impact and feasibility

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Map the customer journey for [product]"
  • "Build a user journey from awareness to advocacy"
  • "Create a journey map for our onboarding experience"
  • "Map out the touchpoints and pain points for [customer type]"
  • "Design an experience map for [process or product]"
1---
2name: customer-journey-map
3description: "Build a customer journey map for a product, service, or experience. Use when asked to map a customer journey, create a user journey, document touchpoints and pain points, or design an experience map. Produces a complete journey map with stages, touchpoints, emotions, pain points, and prioritised opportunities."
4---
5 
6# Customer Journey Map Skill
7 
8This skill produces a complete customer journey map covering every stage from awareness through advocacy. Each stage includes touchpoints, customer actions, emotions, pain points, and specific improvement opportunities. Output is ready for use in product discovery, UX design, or cross-functional alignment workshops.
9 
10## Required Inputs
11 
12Ask the user for these if not provided:
13- **Product or service** being mapped
14- **Customer persona** — which customer segment is this map for? (be specific — one persona per map)
15- **Journey scope** — full end-to-end (awareness → advocacy), or a specific phase (e.g. onboarding only)?
16- **Current state or future state?** — mapping how it works today, or designing how it should work?
17- **Data sources** — any research, user interviews, support tickets, NPS comments, analytics available?
18- **Goal of the map** — what decision will this inform? (redesign, prioritisation, stakeholder alignment, new feature)
19 
20## Output Structure
21 
22---
23 
24# Customer Journey Map: [Product / Service]
25 
26**Persona:** [Name — e.g. "Sarah, the overwhelmed HR manager"]
27**Journey scope:** [Full end-to-end / Onboarding / Purchase / Renewal]
28**Current or future state:** [Current state / Desired future state]
29**Prepared by:** [Name / Team]
30**Date:** [Date]
31**Based on:** [Research sources — interviews, analytics, support data, assumed/hypothetical]
32 
33---
34 
35## Persona Summary
36 
37| | |
38|---|---|
39| **Name** | [Sarah] |
40| **Role** | [HR Manager at a 200-person professional services firm] |
41| **Goal** | [Reduce time spent on manual employee data management] |
42| **Frustrations** | [Too many tools that don't talk to each other; always chasing approvals] |
43| **Tech comfort** | [Moderate — comfortable with SaaS tools but not a power user] |
44| **Decision power** | [Recommends tools; budget approved by CHRO] |
45 
46---
47 
48## Journey Overview
49 
50```
51AWARENESS → CONSIDERATION → DECISION → ONBOARDING → ADOPTION → ADVOCACY
52 [Stage 1] [Stage 2] [Stage 3] [Stage 4] [Stage 5] [Stage 6]
53```
54 
55**Overall experience rating (current state):** [😤 Frustrating / 😐 Neutral / 😊 Positive]
56 
57---
58 
59## Stage 1: Awareness
60 
61*How does the customer first discover the product exists?*
62 
63**Customer goal at this stage:** [e.g. Realise they have a problem worth solving — or find a solution to a specific pain]
64 
65| Element | Detail |
66|---|---|
67| **Trigger** | [What event makes them start looking? — e.g. Manual process breaks down / peer recommendation / saw ad] |
68| **Where they are** | [Google search / LinkedIn / conference / colleague conversation / email newsletter] |
69| **What they do** | [e.g. Searches "automate employee onboarding" / asks peers in HR community / clicks LinkedIn ad] |
70| **Emotion** | [😤 Frustrated — overwhelmed by manual processes and hoping for a better way] |
71| **Pain points** | [Overwhelming number of options / hard to know which tools are credible / can't tell what's B2B vs B2C from homepage] |
72| **Opportunities** | [SEO content targeting the trigger keyword / LinkedIn thought leadership / peer community presence] |
73 
74---
75 
76## Stage 2: Consideration
77 
78*The customer is actively evaluating options. What do they do to decide?*
79 
80| Element | Detail |
81|---|---|
82| **Customer goal** | [Narrow down from many options to a shortlist of 2–3] |
83| **What they do** | [Reads G2/Capterra reviews / watches demo video / downloads comparison guide / asks peers who use something similar] |
84| **Touchpoints** | [Website / review sites / social proof / demo request flow / sales email] |
85| **Emotion** | [😕 Anxious — worried about making the wrong choice; past tool purchases haven't delivered] |
86| **Pain points** | [Pricing not visible on website / demo requires a call before seeing the product / unclear if it works with their existing stack] |
87| **Opportunities** | [Self-serve demo or interactive product tour / transparent pricing page / ROI calculator / case studies from similar company size] |
88 
89---
90 
91## Stage 3: Decision
92 
93*The customer is ready to buy — or not. What makes them commit?*
94 
95| Element | Detail |
96|---|---|
97| **Customer goal** | [Get sign-off from CHRO and justify the decision with a business case] |
98| **What they do** | [Books sales call / requests security questionnaire / builds internal business case / negotiates contract] |
99| **Touchpoints** | [AE / sales call / security review / contract / procurement process] |
100| **Emotion** | [😬 Cautious — doesn't want to be wrong; presenting to leadership adds pressure] |
101| **Pain points** | [Sales process is slow / security questionnaire takes weeks / contract terms are non-standard and require legal] |
102| **Opportunities** | [Security FAQ self-serve / standard contract with predictable terms / champion toolkit (slides, business case template) to help them sell internally] |
103 
104---
105 
106## Stage 4: Onboarding
107 
108*The customer has bought. Now they need to get value fast.*
109 
110| Element | Detail |
111|---|---|
112| **Customer goal** | [Get the product working and show their CHRO it was a good decision] |
113| **What they do** | [Receives welcome email / attends kickoff call / configures integrations / invites team] |
114| **Touchpoints** | [Onboarding email sequence / in-product onboarding checklist / CSM / help centre / integrations marketplace] |
115| **Emotion** | [😬 Anxious but hopeful — excited about potential but stressed about the setup work] |
116| **Pain points** | [Setup is more complex than expected / IT required for SSO but IT is slow to respond / generic onboarding doesn't match their use case] |
117| **Opportunities** | [Role-specific onboarding paths / IT connector with pre-filled request template / quick win email at day 3 (show them one thing that already works)] |
118 
119**Key moment of truth:** [What single moment in this stage determines whether they'll become an active user or ghost? — e.g. "First time the product saves them 30 minutes on a task they used to do manually"]
120 
121---
122 
123## Stage 5: Adoption
124 
125*The customer is using the product. Are they getting consistent value?*
126 
127| Element | Detail |
128|---|---|
129| **Customer goal** | [Make the product a regular part of their workflow; demonstrate ROI to leadership] |
130| **What they do** | [Uses core features daily / discovers new features / hits a limitation / contacts support / attends webinar] |
131| **Touchpoints** | [Product UI / in-app notifications / email / support / community / customer success manager] |
132| **Emotion** | [Variable — some days 😊 when the product works well; some days 😤 when hitting a gap or bug] |
133| **Pain points** | [Feature they expected isn't there / reporting doesn't show the metric leadership wants / power features are too complex / feels like they're underutilising what they're paying for] |
134| **Opportunities** | [Proactive CSM check-in at day 30 / in-product feature discovery / usage dashboard for the customer to see their own ROI / community for peer learning] |
135 
136**Adoption health indicators:**
137- [DAU/MAU ratio — what does healthy look like?]
138- [Feature X used by Y% of seats within Z weeks]
139- [First NPS survey at 60 days — target score]
140 
141---
142 
143## Stage 6: Advocacy
144 
145*The customer loves the product. How do you turn them into a referral engine?*
146 
147| Element | Detail |
148|---|---|
149| **Customer goal** | [Solve problems faster; feel like an expert; feel valued as a customer] |
150| **What they do** | [Refers a peer / writes a G2 review / participates in case study / speaks at event / becomes a power user / joins community] |
151| **Touchpoints** | [CSM / community / review request email / referral programme / case study outreach / conference sponsorship] |
152| **Emotion** | [😊 Proud — the tool is part of their professional identity; they feel smart for choosing it] |
153| **Pain points** | [Referral programme is clunky / no structured way to connect with peers / case study process is slow and effortful for them] |
154| **Opportunities** | [One-click G2 review request at high-satisfaction moment / peer community / referral programme with meaningful reward / case study process that does most of the work for them] |
155 
156---
157 
158## Emotion Curve
159 
160Plot the customer's emotional experience across the journey:
161 
162```
163High 😊 │ * * *
164 │ *
165Neutral 😐│ * *
166 │ *
167Low 😤 │ * *
168 └────────────────────────────────────────────────────
169 Aware Consider Decide Onboard Adopt Advocate
170```
171 
172**Lowest point:** [Which stage has the worst experience — and why?]
173**Highest point:** [When is the customer most delighted — what drove it?]
174**Biggest drop:** [Where does sentiment fall most sharply — this is usually the biggest opportunity]
175 
176---
177 
178## Prioritised Opportunities
179 
180| Opportunity | Stage | Impact on customer | Effort to fix | Priority |
181|---|---|---|---|---|
182| [Self-serve product tour before sales call] | Consideration | [High — removes top buying barrier] | [Medium] | P1 |
183| [Quick win email at day 3] | Onboarding | [High — builds early habit] | [Low] | P1 |
184| [IT SSO setup template] | Onboarding | [Medium — removes specific blocker] | [Low] | P2 |
185| [30-day proactive CSM check-in] | Adoption | [Medium — catches churn signals early] | [Medium] | P2 |
186| [Peer referral programme] | Advocacy | [High for growth — reduces CAC] | [High] | P3 |
187 
188---
189 
190## What We Don't Know (Research Gaps)
191 
192| Gap | How to close it | Priority |
193|---|---|---|
194| [What actually triggers the decision to start looking?] | [5 JTBD interviews with recent buyers] | [High] |
195| [What causes customers to stall in onboarding?] | [Drop-off analysis in onboarding funnel + 3 interviews with churned customers] | [High] |
196| [What % of customers have reached the advocacy stage?] | [Product analytics — identify power users; NPS by cohort] | [Medium] |
197 
198---
199 
200## Deeper Materials
201 
202This skill ships with support files — use them when they are available:
203 
204- **`references/evidence-based-mapping.md`** — Journey Maps Built on Evidence (Not Conference-Room Fiction). Apply it while producing the output; it carries the calibration and judgment calls the method summary above compresses.
205- **`templates/journey-canvas.md`** — a fill-in version of the deliverable with the quality gates inline. Offer it when the user wants to work the document themselves rather than have it generated.
206 
207## Scoring Rubric (0–40)
208 
209Score any output of this skill before handing it over; 32+ is ship-quality.
210 
211| Dimension | 0 | 5 | 10 |
212|---|---|---|---|
213| Persona specificity | "All customers" or a demographic sketch that could be anyone; touchpoints generic to any product | One persona named but thin — goals and frustrations could apply to any buyer in the category | One vivid persona with role, goal, frustrations, and decision power; every touchpoint and pain point is recognisably this product and this person |
214| Evidence grounding | Map is conference-room fiction — no data sources cited, pain points invented | Some sources named but pain points not traced to them; assumed sections not distinguished from researched ones | Sources listed in the header, key pain points tied to specific data (ticket categories, survey %, interview quotes), assumed stages labelled, and a research-gaps table covering the claims the recommendations lean on |
215| Emotional truthfulness | No emotional layer — a process flow wearing a journey map's clothes | Emotions listed per stage but the curve is aspirationally smooth; lowest point unnamed or softened | Emotion at every stage, a curve with a real low, and the lowest point / biggest drop named with evidence — including customer pain that conflicts with an internal team's metric |
216| Opportunity actionability | Opportunities missing, unranked, or platitudes ("improve onboarding") | Opportunities listed but vague, or ranked without impact/effort reasoning; not weighted toward the worst friction | Every opportunity written as a backlog-ready item, ranked by impact and effort, with P1s targeting the highest-friction moment the curve identified |
217 
218## Quality Checks
219 
220- [ ] Map covers one specific persona — not "all customers"
221- [ ] Each stage includes the customer's emotional state — not just actions
222- [ ] Pain points are the customer's pain — not the company's pain
223- [ ] Opportunities are specific enough to become backlog items or design prompts
224- [ ] Emotion curve shows the real experience — not an aspirationally positive version
225- [ ] Research gaps are documented — the map reflects what is known, not assumed
226 
227## Anti-Patterns
228 
229- [ ] Do not build the map from assumptions alone — ground at least the pain points in real customer data or research
230- [ ] Do not treat all journey stages as equally weighted — identify the highest-friction moments explicitly
231- [ ] Do not omit the emotional layer — a journey map without emotions is a process flow, not a customer map
232- [ ] Do not create generic touchpoints that apply to any product — each touchpoint must be specific to this product and customer
233- [ ] Do not leave opportunities unranked — prioritise by impact and feasibility
234 
235## Example Trigger Phrases
236 
237- "Map the customer journey for [product]"
238- "Build a user journey from awareness to advocacy"
239- "Create a journey map for our onboarding experience"
240- "Map out the touchpoints and pain points for [customer type]"
241- "Design an experience map for [process or product]"
242 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 23, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 1,395
Checked
Source
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
Creator
mohitagw15856 · 193 listings
View creator

Made with customer-journey-map

Customer Journey Map Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Customer Journey Map Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Customer Journey Map Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Customer Journey Map Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Similar skills

See all →
SkillReverse engineer native, managed, Electron/JavaScriptREAmorluto/rea · by morlutoReverse engineer native, managed, Electron/JavaScript, packaged, firmware, and browser targets with REA. Use shipped-artifact or requested runtime evidence to explain features, compare versions, decompile code, or guide a reconstruction. Skip REA for ordinary source-repository architecture analysis.★ 316k GitHub starsSkillBrainstorms ideas into designs before any creative workBrainstorming Ideas Into Designsobra/superpowers · by obraYou MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.★ 290k GitHub starsSkillRequires technical rigor and verificationCode Review Receptionobra/superpowers · by obraUse when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation★ 290k GitHub starsSkillDiagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressionsDiagnosing bugsmattpocock/skills · by mattpocockDiagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.★ 267k GitHub starsSkillImplement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in codeImplement specmattpocock/skills · by mattpocockImplement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in code.★ 267k GitHub starsSkillWriting a PR bodymattpocock/skills · by mattpocockUse when writing a PR body.★ 267k GitHub stars

More from mohitagw15856

SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product featuresA/B Test Planner Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklistAccessibility Audit Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillBuild a structured account plan for any key customerAccount Plan Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization so AIAEO Optimizer Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillConduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML featureAI Ethics Review Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.★ 1.4k GitHub stars