New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Design an employee engagement survey and analyse results

Employee Engagement Survey Skill

by mohitagw15856 · MIT license · ★ 1,395 on GitHub · updated Sep 23

Employee Engagement Survey Skill cover

Design an employee engagement survey and analyse results. Use when asked to create an employee survey, engagement questionnaire, pulse survey, or eNPS survey.

---
name: employee-engagement-survey
description: "Design an employee engagement survey and analyse results. Use when asked to create an employee survey, engagement questionnaire, pulse survey, or eNPS survey. Also use when asked to analyse survey results. Produces a complete survey with questions, rating scales, and an analysis framework."
---

# Employee Engagement Survey Skill

Designs complete employee engagement surveys and provides a framework for analysing and acting on results.

## Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:
- **Mode** — designing a new survey or analysing existing results
- **Survey type** (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
- **Company name** (for personalisation of question text)
- **Company size and stage** (startup / scaleup / enterprise — affects question relevance)
- **Key areas of concern** (optional — e.g. "we have had high attrition on the engineering team")
- **Anonymity approach** — fully anonymous, team-level reporting only, or individual responses visible to HR

Overview

Designs complete employee engagement surveys and provides a framework for analysing and acting on results.

What you get

  • Design Modedelivers: the question set grouped by driver (each with its response scale and the reason it earns its place), the anonymity/threshold rules stated up front, the invitation copy, and the analysis plan written before data exists — so nobody designs the analysis around the answers.
  • Analysis Modedelivers: participation and segment coverage first (with the n-below-threshold segments suppressed and said so), driver scores vs. prior wave with the deltas that clear noise flagged, verbatim themes with prevalence counts, and a "three commitments" section — because a survey that doesn't end in visible action is the fastest way to kill next year's response rate.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill employee-engagement-survey -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/employee-engagement-survey
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/3cb4d323b0a432554e0b/employee-engagement-survey.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\employee-engagement-survey.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\employee-engagement-survey.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/f6ca7931 file
SKILL.md
Show the full text120 lines

Employee Engagement Survey Skill

Designs complete employee engagement surveys and provides a framework for analysing and acting on results.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Mode — designing a new survey or analysing existing results
  • Survey type (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
  • Company name (for personalisation of question text)
  • Company size and stage (startup / scaleup / enterprise — affects question relevance)
  • Key areas of concern (optional — e.g. "we have had high attrition on the engineering team")
  • Anonymity approach — fully anonymous, team-level reporting only, or individual responses visible to HR
  • Length target (short: 5–10 questions / standard: 15–25 / comprehensive: 30+)
  • For analysis mode: survey results data (paste as table, CSV, or summary statistics)

Mode Detection

  • User provides survey results -> Analysis mode
  • User wants to create a survey -> Design mode

Design Mode

Required Inputs
  • Survey type (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
  • Company size and stage
  • Key areas of concern (optional)
  • Anonymity approach
  • Length target (short: 5-10 / standard: 15-25 / comprehensive: 30+)
Opening Statement (always include)

"This survey is anonymous. Your responses help us understand what is working and what to improve. Results will be shared with [who] and we will communicate actions taken by [date]."

Core Questions

Overall Engagement

  1. On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to recommend [Company] as a great place to work? (eNPS)
  2. I feel proud to work at [Company]. [1-5]
  3. I intend to still be working here in 12 months. [1-5]

Role and Clarity 4. I understand how my work contributes to company goals. [1-5] 5. I have the tools and resources I need to do my job. [1-5] 6. My workload is manageable. [1-5]

Manager and Team 7. My manager gives useful feedback. [1-5] 8. My manager cares about my development. [1-5] 9. I feel part of a team that works well together. [1-5]

Culture and Belonging 10. I feel I can be myself at work. [1-5] 11. People treat each other with respect. [1-5] 12. [Company] lives by its stated values. [1-5]

Growth and Recognition 13. I have opportunities to grow and develop. [1-5] 14. My contributions are recognised. [1-5] 15. I have had a meaningful career conversation in the last 6 months. [Yes/No]

Open questions (always include)

  • What is one thing [Company] should start doing?
  • What is one thing [Company] should stop doing?
  • Anything else to share?

Analysis Mode

Analysis Output

1. Headline Scores

Metric Score Benchmark Trend
eNPS [-100 to +100] Industry avg vs last survey

eNPS: Below 0 = Concerning / 0-30 = Good / 30-70 = Great / 70+ = Excellent

2. Strengths — Top scoring areas with evidence.

3. Improvement Areas — 3 lowest scoring areas with verbatim comment themes.

4. Action Planning Template

Improvement area Action Owner Timeline Measure

5. Communication Template — Draft message to share results with employees.

Output Format

  • Design Mode delivers: the question set grouped by driver (each with its response scale and the reason it earns its place), the anonymity/threshold rules stated up front, the invitation copy, and the analysis plan written before data exists — so nobody designs the analysis around the answers.
  • Analysis Mode delivers: participation and segment coverage first (with the n-below-threshold segments suppressed and said so), driver scores vs. prior wave with the deltas that clear noise flagged, verbatim themes with prevalence counts, and a "three commitments" section — because a survey that doesn't end in visible action is the fastest way to kill next year's response rate.

Quality Checks

  • Survey includes anonymity statement at the start
  • eNPS question (0-10 recommend scale) is included in all survey types
  • Open-ended questions are included (not just Likert scales)
  • Analysis includes a specific action planning template (not just observations)
  • Results communication template commits to sharing back with employees by a specific date

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not launch a survey without committing to a communication-back date — surveys with no follow-through reduce trust and depress future response rates
  • Do not use only Likert scale questions — open-text responses surface specific themes that quantitative scores cannot, and are essential for action planning
  • Do not design a comprehensive 30+ question survey as a pulse — pulse surveys that take more than 5 minutes see sharply lower completion rates
  • Do not present analysis without an action planning template — raw scores without committed actions are the most common reason engagement survey data is ignored
  • Do not segment results below teams of 5 when anonymity is promised — small-group breakdowns allow individual identification and destroy psychological safety

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Create an employee engagement survey for our team"
  • "Design a pulse survey for [topic]"
  • "Analyse these engagement survey results: [paste]"
1---
2name: employee-engagement-survey
3description: "Design an employee engagement survey and analyse results. Use when asked to create an employee survey, engagement questionnaire, pulse survey, or eNPS survey. Also use when asked to analyse survey results. Produces a complete survey with questions, rating scales, and an analysis framework."
4---
5 
6# Employee Engagement Survey Skill
7 
8Designs complete employee engagement surveys and provides a framework for analysing and acting on results.
9 
10## Required Inputs
11 
12Ask the user for these if not provided:
13- **Mode** — designing a new survey or analysing existing results
14- **Survey type** (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
15- **Company name** (for personalisation of question text)
16- **Company size and stage** (startup / scaleup / enterprise — affects question relevance)
17- **Key areas of concern** (optional — e.g. "we have had high attrition on the engineering team")
18- **Anonymity approach** — fully anonymous, team-level reporting only, or individual responses visible to HR
19- **Length target** (short: 5–10 questions / standard: 15–25 / comprehensive: 30+)
20- **For analysis mode:** survey results data (paste as table, CSV, or summary statistics)
21 
22## Mode Detection
23- User provides survey results -> Analysis mode
24- User wants to create a survey -> Design mode
25 
26---
27 
28## Design Mode
29 
30### Required Inputs
31- Survey type (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
32- Company size and stage
33- Key areas of concern (optional)
34- Anonymity approach
35- Length target (short: 5-10 / standard: 15-25 / comprehensive: 30+)
36 
37### Opening Statement (always include)
38"This survey is anonymous. Your responses help us understand what is working and what to improve. Results will be shared with [who] and we will communicate actions taken by [date]."
39 
40### Core Questions
41 
42**Overall Engagement**
431. On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to recommend [Company] as a great place to work? (eNPS)
442. I feel proud to work at [Company]. [1-5]
453. I intend to still be working here in 12 months. [1-5]
46 
47**Role and Clarity**
484. I understand how my work contributes to company goals. [1-5]
495. I have the tools and resources I need to do my job. [1-5]
506. My workload is manageable. [1-5]
51 
52**Manager and Team**
537. My manager gives useful feedback. [1-5]
548. My manager cares about my development. [1-5]
559. I feel part of a team that works well together. [1-5]
56 
57**Culture and Belonging**
5810. I feel I can be myself at work. [1-5]
5911. People treat each other with respect. [1-5]
6012. [Company] lives by its stated values. [1-5]
61 
62**Growth and Recognition**
6313. I have opportunities to grow and develop. [1-5]
6414. My contributions are recognised. [1-5]
6515. I have had a meaningful career conversation in the last 6 months. [Yes/No]
66 
67**Open questions (always include)**
68- What is one thing [Company] should start doing?
69- What is one thing [Company] should stop doing?
70- Anything else to share?
71 
72---
73 
74## Analysis Mode
75 
76### Analysis Output
77 
78**1. Headline Scores**
79| Metric | Score | Benchmark | Trend |
80|---|---|---|---|
81| eNPS | [-100 to +100] | Industry avg | vs last survey |
82 
83eNPS: Below 0 = Concerning / 0-30 = Good / 30-70 = Great / 70+ = Excellent
84 
85**2. Strengths** — Top scoring areas with evidence.
86 
87**3. Improvement Areas** — 3 lowest scoring areas with verbatim comment themes.
88 
89**4. Action Planning Template**
90| Improvement area | Action | Owner | Timeline | Measure |
91|---|---|---|---|---|
92 
93**5. Communication Template** — Draft message to share results with employees.
94 
95## Output Format
96 
97- **Design Mode** delivers: the question set grouped by driver (each with its response scale and the reason it earns its place), the anonymity/threshold rules stated up front, the invitation copy, and the analysis plan written *before* data exists — so nobody designs the analysis around the answers.
98- **Analysis Mode** delivers: participation and segment coverage first (with the n-below-threshold segments suppressed and said so), driver scores vs. prior wave with the deltas that clear noise flagged, verbatim themes with prevalence counts, and a **"three commitments" section** — because a survey that doesn't end in visible action is the fastest way to kill next year's response rate.
99 
100## Quality Checks
101 
102- [ ] Survey includes anonymity statement at the start
103- [ ] eNPS question (0-10 recommend scale) is included in all survey types
104- [ ] Open-ended questions are included (not just Likert scales)
105- [ ] Analysis includes a specific action planning template (not just observations)
106- [ ] Results communication template commits to sharing back with employees by a specific date
107 
108## Anti-Patterns
109 
110- [ ] Do not launch a survey without committing to a communication-back date — surveys with no follow-through reduce trust and depress future response rates
111- [ ] Do not use only Likert scale questions — open-text responses surface specific themes that quantitative scores cannot, and are essential for action planning
112- [ ] Do not design a comprehensive 30+ question survey as a pulse — pulse surveys that take more than 5 minutes see sharply lower completion rates
113- [ ] Do not present analysis without an action planning template — raw scores without committed actions are the most common reason engagement survey data is ignored
114- [ ] Do not segment results below teams of 5 when anonymity is promised — small-group breakdowns allow individual identification and destroy psychological safety
115 
116## Example Trigger Phrases
117- "Create an employee engagement survey for our team"
118- "Design a pulse survey for [topic]"
119- "Analyse these engagement survey results: [paste]"
120 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 23, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 1,395
Checked
Source
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
Creator
mohitagw15856 · 193 listings
View creator

Made with employee-engagement-survey

Employee Engagement Survey Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Employee Engagement Survey Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Employee Engagement Survey Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Employee Engagement Survey Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Similar skills

See all →
SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillExtracting first-party expertise from a subject-matterExpert interviewinhouseseo/superseo-skills · by inhouseseoUse when extracting first-party expertise from a subject-matter expert before writing content. Produces a knowledge document of contrarian takes, specific examples, and surprising outcomes that AI can't fabricate.★ 353 GitHub starsSkillStart of the UGC pipeline for persona researchPersona & ScriptTheMattBerman/scrollclaw · by TheMattBermanStart of the UGC pipeline for persona research, creator profiles, format selection, and scriptwriting. Use when the user is clearly asking for messaging work rather than broad full-pipeline orchestration.★ 71 GitHub starsSkillTell us who you need answers from and what you're missingTo questionnairemattpocock/skills · by mattpocockTell us who you need answers from and what you're missing; get back a clean form you send them to fill in.★ 267k GitHub starsSkillExtracts what the user actually wants instead of what theyInterview meaddyosmani/agent-skills · by addyosmaniExtracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.★ 98.7k GitHub starsSkillMarketes psychology & mental modelsMarketing Psychology & Mental Modelscoreyhaines31/marketingskills · by coreyhaines31When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.★ 51.1k GitHub stars

More from mohitagw15856

SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product featuresA/B Test Planner Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklistAccessibility Audit Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillBuild a structured account plan for any key customerAccount Plan Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization so AIAEO Optimizer Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillConduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML featureAI Ethics Review Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.★ 1.4k GitHub stars