Engineering principles for building software like a senior
Senior Engineering Principles

Engineering principles for building software like a senior engineer. Load when tackling non-trivial development work, architecting systems, reviewing code, or orchestrating multi-agent builds.
--- name: senior-engineering description: Engineering principles for building software like a senior engineer. Load when tackling non-trivial development work, architecting systems, reviewing code, or orchestrating multi-agent builds. Covers planning, delivery, quality gates, and LLM-specific patterns. --- # Senior Engineering Principles Guidelines for building software with the judgment and discipline of a senior engineer. ## Safety Boundaries - Do not treat these principles as permission to skip user approval for destructive or high-risk changes. - Do not expand scope beyond the user's request just because a broader rewrite seems cleaner. - Do not invent validation results; report what was actually checked and what remains unverified. ## Before Writing Code ### Define Done First
Overview
Guidelines for building software with the judgment and discipline of a senior engineer.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add jdrhyne/agent-skills --skill senior-engineering -g -a claude-codemkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/jdrhyne/agent-skills/tar.gz/439cd3a9da78 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 agent-skills-439cd3a9da78/prompts/senior-engineeringNew-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/52234e808bfd78542476/senior-engineering.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\senior-engineering.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\senior-engineering.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md4.9 KB
Read the files here
jdrhyne/
Show the full text148 lines
Senior Engineering Principles
Guidelines for building software with the judgment and discipline of a senior engineer.
Safety Boundaries
- Do not treat these principles as permission to skip user approval for destructive or high-risk changes.
- Do not expand scope beyond the user's request just because a broader rewrite seems cleaner.
- Do not invent validation results; report what was actually checked and what remains unverified.
Before Writing Code
Define Done First
- What does success look like? Write it down.
- What are the acceptance criteria?
- How will you verify it works?
Identify Load-Bearing Decisions
- Which choices are hard to reverse? → More scrutiny
- Which are easily changed? → Decide fast, move on
- Reversible decisions don't need consensus
Decompose Before Building
- Break work into clear, testable units
- Each unit should be independently verifiable
- If you can't explain the pieces, you don't understand the whole
Surface Risks Upfront
- What could go wrong?
- What are the dependencies?
- What's the rollback plan?
- Time-box exploration — analysis paralysis is real
Interface First, Implementation Second
- Define the contract (types, API shape, error cases) before internals
- Forces clarity on what you're actually building
- Implementation becomes "fill in the blanks"
Ask: What's the Simplest Thing That Could Work?
- Start there. Add complexity only when the simple version fails.
- Most features need 20% of what we imagine.
During Build
Always Have a Runnable State
- Never be more than 30 mins from something that compiles/runs
- Commit working checkpoints frequently
- Big-bang integration is where projects die
Prefer Incremental Over Big-Bang
- Ship small, verify, iterate
- Each step should be independently deployable if possible
- Reduce blast radius of mistakes
Instrument As You Build
- Add logging/metrics while coding, not when debugging prod
- "I wish I had visibility into X" = you waited too long
- Observability is a feature, not an afterthought
Read Errors Carefully
- 80% of debugging is actually reading what the system tells you
- Read the error, then read it again
- Stack traces have answers — follow them
Boring > Clever
- If someone has to pause to understand it, it's too clever
- Save big-brain moves for genuinely hard problems
- Maintainability beats elegance
Optimize for Delete
- Write code that's easy to remove
- Tight coupling makes features immortal
- Good abstractions have clear boundaries
Quality Gates
Before Declaring Done
- Linter passes
- Type checker passes
- Tests pass (unit + integration where applicable)
- Manual smoke test completed
- Edge cases considered and handled
Tests Are Documentation
- A good test suite tells you what code is supposed to do
- Treat tests as first-class citizens
- If it's not tested, it's not done
Code Review Mindset
- Review like you'll maintain it at 3am
- Check: correctness, clarity, edge cases, security
- "It works" is necessary but not sufficient
LLM Orchestration Principles
Context Management
- Context window is your RAM — manage it deliberately
- Bloated context = degraded reasoning
- Give each agent minimum viable context, no more
Agent Delegation
- Single responsibility per agent
- Clear handoff contracts: inputs, outputs, success criteria
- Parallel when independent, sequential when dependent
Verify, Don't Trust
- First output is a draft, always
- Review agent output like a code review
- Agents are junior engineers, not oracles
Checkpoints Over Marathons
- Long-running agents should checkpoint progress
- If it crashes at 90%, don't lose everything
- Log state to files, not just memory
Fail Fast, Surface Early
- If something's going wrong, stop and reassess
- Don't compound errors hoping they'll resolve
- Human in the loop for high-stakes decisions
Ownership & Accountability
Own Failures, Credit Others
- Own failures publicly
- Credit others for wins
- No ego-driven attachment to being right
Strong Opinions, Weakly Held
- Have a position, defend it with evidence
- Update beliefs when evidence demands it
- "I was wrong" is a sign of growth
Leave It Better
- Codebases, teams, processes — improve what you touch
- Fix the small things while you're there
- Documentation is a gift to future-you
The Meta-Principle
"Make the change easy, then make the easy change." — Kent Beck
Most senior engineering is about preparation — setting up the codebase so the actual feature is trivial. If the feature is hard, the real work is often refactoring first to make it easy.
| 1 | |
| 2 | name senior-engineering |
| 3 | description Engineering principles for building software like a senior engineer. Load when tackling non-trivial development work, architecting systems, reviewing code, or orchestrating multi-agent builds. Covers planning, delivery, quality gates, and LLM-specific patterns. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Senior Engineering Principles |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Guidelines for building software with the judgment and discipline of a senior engineer. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## Safety Boundaries |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Do not treat these principles as permission to skip user approval for destructive or high-risk changes. |
| 13 | Do not expand scope beyond the user's request just because a broader rewrite seems cleaner. |
| 14 | Do not invent validation results; report what was actually checked and what remains unverified. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | ## Before Writing Code |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ### Define Done First |
| 19 | What does success look like? Write it down. |
| 20 | What are the acceptance criteria? |
| 21 | How will you verify it works? |
| 22 | |
| 23 | ### Identify Load-Bearing Decisions |
| 24 | Which choices are hard to reverse? → More scrutiny |
| 25 | Which are easily changed? → Decide fast, move on |
| 26 | Reversible decisions don't need consensus |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ### Decompose Before Building |
| 29 | Break work into clear, testable units |
| 30 | Each unit should be independently verifiable |
| 31 | If you can't explain the pieces, you don't understand the whole |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ### Surface Risks Upfront |
| 34 | What could go wrong? |
| 35 | What are the dependencies? |
| 36 | What's the rollback plan? |
| 37 | Time-box exploration — analysis paralysis is real |
| 38 | |
| 39 | ### Interface First, Implementation Second |
| 40 | Define the contract (types, API shape, error cases) before internals |
| 41 | Forces clarity on what you're actually building |
| 42 | Implementation becomes "fill in the blanks" |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ### Ask: What's the Simplest Thing That Could Work? |
| 45 | Start there. Add complexity only when the simple version fails. |
| 46 | Most features need 20% of what we imagine. |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ## During Build |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ### Always Have a Runnable State |
| 51 | Never be more than 30 mins from something that compiles/runs |
| 52 | Commit working checkpoints frequently |
| 53 | Big-bang integration is where projects die |
| 54 | |
| 55 | ### Prefer Incremental Over Big-Bang |
| 56 | Ship small, verify, iterate |
| 57 | Each step should be independently deployable if possible |
| 58 | Reduce blast radius of mistakes |
| 59 | |
| 60 | ### Instrument As You Build |
| 61 | Add logging/metrics while coding, not when debugging prod |
| 62 | "I wish I had visibility into X" = you waited too long |
| 63 | Observability is a feature, not an afterthought |
| 64 | |
| 65 | ### Read Errors Carefully |
| 66 | 80% of debugging is actually reading what the system tells you |
| 67 | Read the error, then read it again |
| 68 | Stack traces have answers — follow them |
| 69 | |
| 70 | ### Boring > Clever |
| 71 | If someone has to pause to understand it, it's too clever |
| 72 | Save big-brain moves for genuinely hard problems |
| 73 | Maintainability beats elegance |
| 74 | |
| 75 | ### Optimize for Delete |
| 76 | Write code that's easy to remove |
| 77 | Tight coupling makes features immortal |
| 78 | Good abstractions have clear boundaries |
| 79 | |
| 80 | ## Quality Gates |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ### Before Declaring Done |
| 83 | [ ] Linter passes |
| 84 | [ ] Type checker passes |
| 85 | [ ] Tests pass (unit + integration where applicable) |
| 86 | [ ] Manual smoke test completed |
| 87 | [ ] Edge cases considered and handled |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ### Tests Are Documentation |
| 90 | A good test suite tells you what code is *supposed* to do |
| 91 | Treat tests as first-class citizens |
| 92 | If it's not tested, it's not done |
| 93 | |
| 94 | ### Code Review Mindset |
| 95 | Review like you'll maintain it at 3am |
| 96 | Check: correctness, clarity, edge cases, security |
| 97 | "It works" is necessary but not sufficient |
| 98 | |
| 99 | ## LLM Orchestration Principles |
| 100 | |
| 101 | ### Context Management |
| 102 | Context window is your RAM — manage it deliberately |
| 103 | Bloated context = degraded reasoning |
| 104 | Give each agent minimum viable context, no more |
| 105 | |
| 106 | ### Agent Delegation |
| 107 | Single responsibility per agent |
| 108 | Clear handoff contracts: inputs, outputs, success criteria |
| 109 | Parallel when independent, sequential when dependent |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ### Verify, Don't Trust |
| 112 | First output is a draft, always |
| 113 | Review agent output like a code review |
| 114 | Agents are junior engineers, not oracles |
| 115 | |
| 116 | ### Checkpoints Over Marathons |
| 117 | Long-running agents should checkpoint progress |
| 118 | If it crashes at 90%, don't lose everything |
| 119 | Log state to files, not just memory |
| 120 | |
| 121 | ### Fail Fast, Surface Early |
| 122 | If something's going wrong, stop and reassess |
| 123 | Don't compound errors hoping they'll resolve |
| 124 | Human in the loop for high-stakes decisions |
| 125 | |
| 126 | ## Ownership & Accountability |
| 127 | |
| 128 | ### Own Failures, Credit Others |
| 129 | Own failures publicly |
| 130 | Credit others for wins |
| 131 | No ego-driven attachment to being right |
| 132 | |
| 133 | ### Strong Opinions, Weakly Held |
| 134 | Have a position, defend it with evidence |
| 135 | Update beliefs when evidence demands it |
| 136 | "I was wrong" is a sign of growth |
| 137 | |
| 138 | ### Leave It Better |
| 139 | Codebases, teams, processes — improve what you touch |
| 140 | Fix the small things while you're there |
| 141 | Documentation is a gift to future-you |
| 142 | |
| 143 | ## The Meta-Principle |
| 144 | |
| 145 | > "Make the change easy, then make the easy change." — Kent Beck |
| 146 | |
| 147 | Most senior engineering is about *preparation* — setting up the codebase so the actual feature is trivial. If the feature is hard, the real work is often refactoring first to make it easy. |
| 148 |
Details
- Updated
- Aug 30, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 240
- Checked
- Source
- jdrhyne/agent-skills ↗
- Creator
- jdrhyne · 24 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillReverse engineer native, managed, Electron/JavaScriptREA
SkillBrainstorms ideas into designs before any creative workBrainstorming Ideas Into Designs
SkillRequires technical rigor and verificationCode Review Reception
SkillDiagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressionsDiagnosing bugs
SkillImplement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in codeImplement spec
SkillWriting a PR bodyMore from jdrhyne
SkillRun Codex CLI or references OpenAI Codex for code analysisCodex Skill Guide
SkillCreating a Claude Code slash commandCommand creator
SkillRecover missing conversation context after explicitContext recovery
SkillGenerate beautifully designed PDF reportsElegant reports
SkillRead Google Analytics 4 reporting data through the GA4 DataGA4 Data API
SkillBulk download images from login-protected gallery websitesGallery scraper