New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps

Sales Engineer Skill

by alirezarezvani · MIT license · ★ 26,349 on GitHub · updated Aug 30

Sales Engineer Skill cover

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing…

---
name: "sales-engineer"
description: Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
---

# Sales Engineer Skill

## 5-Phase Workflow

### Phase 1: Discovery & Research

**Objective:** Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

**Checklist:**
- [ ] Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders
- [ ] Map customer's current architecture and pain points
- [ ] Identify integration requirements and constraints
- [ ] Document security and compliance requirements

Overview

Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill sales-engineer -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tar.gz/19392f7a0826 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 claude-skills-19392f7a0826/business-growth/skills/sales-engineer
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/e9776b8c97a8c5e962f9/sales-engineer.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\sales-engineer.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\sales-engineer.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB
  • assets/5 files · 41.8 KB
  • references/3 files · 27.5 KB
  • scripts/3 files · 62.7 KB
Read the files here
alirezarezvani/19392f712 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text226 lines

Sales Engineer Skill

5-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery & Research

Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

Checklist:

  • Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders
  • Map customer's current architecture and pain points
  • Identify integration requirements and constraints
  • Document security and compliance requirements
  • Assess competitive landscape for this opportunity

Tools: Run rfp_response_analyzer.py to score initial requirement alignment.

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json > phase1_rfp_results.json

Output: Technical discovery document, requirement map, initial coverage assessment.

Validation checkpoint: Coverage score must be >50% and must-have gaps ≤3 before proceeding to Phase 2. Check with:

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json | python -c "import sys,json; r=json.load(sys.stdin); print('PROCEED' if r['coverage_score']>50 and r['must_have_gaps']<=3 else 'REVIEW')"

Phase 2: Solution Design

Objective: Design a solution architecture that addresses customer requirements.

Checklist:

  • Map product capabilities to customer requirements
  • Design integration architecture
  • Identify customization needs and development effort
  • Build competitive differentiation strategy
  • Create solution architecture diagrams

Tools: Run competitive_matrix_builder.py using Phase 1 data to identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.

python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json > phase2_competitive.json

python -c "import json; d=json.load(open('phase2_competitive.json')); print('Differentiators:', d['differentiators']); print('Vulnerabilities:', d['vulnerabilities'])"

Output: Solution architecture, competitive positioning, technical differentiation strategy.

Validation checkpoint: Confirm at least one strong differentiator exists per customer priority before proceeding to Phase 3. If no differentiators found, escalate to Product Team (see Integration Points).


Phase 3: Demo Preparation & Delivery

Objective: Deliver compelling technical demonstrations tailored to stakeholder priorities.

Checklist:

  • Build demo environment matching customer's use case
  • Create demo script with talking points per stakeholder role
  • Prepare objection handling responses
  • Rehearse failure scenarios and recovery paths
  • Collect feedback and adjust approach

Templates: Use assets/demo_script_template.md for structured demo preparation.

Output: Customized demo, stakeholder-specific talking points, feedback capture.

Validation checkpoint: Demo script must cover every must-have requirement flagged in phase1_rfp_results.json before delivery. Cross-reference with:

python -c "import json; rfp=json.load(open('phase1_rfp_results.json')); [print('UNCOVERED:', r) for r in rfp['must_have_requirements'] if r['coverage']=='Gap']"

Phase 4: POC & Evaluation

Objective: Execute a structured proof-of-concept that validates the solution.

Checklist:

  • Define POC scope, success criteria, and timeline
  • Allocate resources and set up environment
  • Execute phased testing (core, advanced, edge cases)
  • Track progress against success criteria
  • Generate evaluation scorecard

Tools: Run poc_planner.py to generate the complete POC plan.

python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json > phase4_poc_plan.json

python -c "import json; p=json.load(open('phase4_poc_plan.json')); print('Go/No-Go:', p['recommendation'])"

Templates: Use assets/poc_scorecard_template.md for evaluation tracking.

Output: POC plan, evaluation scorecard, go/no-go recommendation.

Validation checkpoint: POC conversion requires scorecard score >60% across all evaluation dimensions (functionality, performance, integration, usability, support). If score <60%, document gaps and loop back to Phase 2 for solution redesign.


Phase 5: Proposal & Closing

Objective: Deliver a technical proposal that supports the commercial close.

Checklist:

  • Compile POC results and success metrics
  • Create technical proposal with implementation plan
  • Address outstanding objections with evidence
  • Support pricing and packaging discussions
  • Conduct win/loss analysis post-decision

Templates: Use assets/technical_proposal_template.md for the proposal document.

Output: Technical proposal, implementation timeline, risk mitigation plan.


Python Automation Tools

1. RFP Response Analyzer

Script: scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py

Purpose: Parse RFP/RFI requirements, score coverage, identify gaps, and generate bid/no-bid recommendations.

Coverage Categories: Full (100%), Partial (50%), Planned (25%), Gap (0%).
Priority Weighting: Must-Have 3×, Should-Have 2×, Nice-to-Have 1×.

Bid/No-Bid Logic:

  • Bid: Coverage >70% AND must-have gaps ≤3
  • Conditional Bid: Coverage 50–70% OR must-have gaps 2–3
  • No-Bid: Coverage <50% OR must-have gaps >3

Usage:

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json            # human-readable
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json  # JSON output
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py --help

Input Format: See assets/sample_rfp_data.json for the complete schema.


2. Competitive Matrix Builder

Script: scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py

Purpose: Generate feature comparison matrices, calculate competitive scores, identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.

Feature Scoring: Full (3), Partial (2), Limited (1), None (0).

Usage:

python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json              # human-readable
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json  # JSON output

Output Includes: Feature comparison matrix, weighted competitive scores, differentiators, vulnerabilities, and win themes.


3. POC Planner

Script: scripts/poc_planner.py

Purpose: Generate structured POC plans with timeline, resource allocation, success criteria, and evaluation scorecards.

Default Phase Breakdown:

  • Week 1: Setup — environment provisioning, data migration, configuration
  • Weeks 2–3: Core Testing — primary use cases, integration testing
  • Week 4: Advanced Testing — edge cases, performance, security
  • Week 5: Evaluation — scorecard completion, stakeholder review, go/no-go

Usage:

python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json              # human-readable
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json  # JSON output

Output Includes: Phased POC plan, resource allocation, success criteria, evaluation scorecard, risk register, and go/no-go recommendation framework.


Reference Knowledge Bases

Reference Description
references/rfp-response-guide.md RFP/RFI response best practices, compliance matrix, bid/no-bid framework
references/competitive-positioning-framework.md Competitive analysis methodology, battlecard creation, objection handling
references/poc-best-practices.md POC planning methodology, success criteria, evaluation frameworks

Asset Templates

Template Purpose
assets/technical_proposal_template.md Technical proposal with executive summary, solution architecture, implementation plan
assets/demo_script_template.md Demo script with agenda, talking points, objection handling
assets/poc_scorecard_template.md POC evaluation scorecard with weighted scoring
assets/sample_rfp_data.json Sample RFP data for testing the analyzer
assets/expected_output.json Expected output from rfp_response_analyzer.py

Integration Points

  • Marketing Skills - Leverage competitive intelligence and messaging frameworks from marketing-skill/
  • Product Team - Coordinate on roadmap items flagged as "Planned" in RFP analysis from product-team/
  • C-Level Advisory - Escalate strategic deals requiring executive engagement from c-level-advisor/
  • Customer Success - Hand off POC results and success criteria to CSM from ../customer-success-manager/

Last Updated: February 2026 Status: Production-ready Tools: 3 Python automation scripts References: 3 knowledge base documents Templates: 5 asset files

1---
2name: "sales-engineer"
3description: Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
4---
5 
6# Sales Engineer Skill
7 
8## 5-Phase Workflow
9 
10### Phase 1: Discovery & Research
11 
12**Objective:** Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.
13 
14**Checklist:**
15- [ ] Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders
16- [ ] Map customer's current architecture and pain points
17- [ ] Identify integration requirements and constraints
18- [ ] Document security and compliance requirements
19- [ ] Assess competitive landscape for this opportunity
20 
21**Tools:** Run `rfp_response_analyzer.py` to score initial requirement alignment.
22 
23```bash
24python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json > phase1_rfp_results.json
25```
26 
27**Output:** Technical discovery document, requirement map, initial coverage assessment.
28 
29**Validation checkpoint:** Coverage score must be >50% and must-have gaps ≤3 before proceeding to Phase 2. Check with:
30```bash
31python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json | python -c "import sys,json; r=json.load(sys.stdin); print('PROCEED' if r['coverage_score']>50 and r['must_have_gaps']<=3 else 'REVIEW')"
32```
33 
34---
35 
36### Phase 2: Solution Design
37 
38**Objective:** Design a solution architecture that addresses customer requirements.
39 
40**Checklist:**
41- [ ] Map product capabilities to customer requirements
42- [ ] Design integration architecture
43- [ ] Identify customization needs and development effort
44- [ ] Build competitive differentiation strategy
45- [ ] Create solution architecture diagrams
46 
47**Tools:** Run `competitive_matrix_builder.py` using Phase 1 data to identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.
48 
49```bash
50python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json > phase2_competitive.json
51 
52python -c "import json; d=json.load(open('phase2_competitive.json')); print('Differentiators:', d['differentiators']); print('Vulnerabilities:', d['vulnerabilities'])"
53```
54 
55**Output:** Solution architecture, competitive positioning, technical differentiation strategy.
56 
57**Validation checkpoint:** Confirm at least one strong differentiator exists per customer priority before proceeding to Phase 3. If no differentiators found, escalate to Product Team (see Integration Points).
58 
59---
60 
61### Phase 3: Demo Preparation & Delivery
62 
63**Objective:** Deliver compelling technical demonstrations tailored to stakeholder priorities.
64 
65**Checklist:**
66- [ ] Build demo environment matching customer's use case
67- [ ] Create demo script with talking points per stakeholder role
68- [ ] Prepare objection handling responses
69- [ ] Rehearse failure scenarios and recovery paths
70- [ ] Collect feedback and adjust approach
71 
72**Templates:** Use `assets/demo_script_template.md` for structured demo preparation.
73 
74**Output:** Customized demo, stakeholder-specific talking points, feedback capture.
75 
76**Validation checkpoint:** Demo script must cover every must-have requirement flagged in `phase1_rfp_results.json` before delivery. Cross-reference with:
77```bash
78python -c "import json; rfp=json.load(open('phase1_rfp_results.json')); [print('UNCOVERED:', r) for r in rfp['must_have_requirements'] if r['coverage']=='Gap']"
79```
80 
81---
82 
83### Phase 4: POC & Evaluation
84 
85**Objective:** Execute a structured proof-of-concept that validates the solution.
86 
87**Checklist:**
88- [ ] Define POC scope, success criteria, and timeline
89- [ ] Allocate resources and set up environment
90- [ ] Execute phased testing (core, advanced, edge cases)
91- [ ] Track progress against success criteria
92- [ ] Generate evaluation scorecard
93 
94**Tools:** Run `poc_planner.py` to generate the complete POC plan.
95 
96```bash
97python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json > phase4_poc_plan.json
98 
99python -c "import json; p=json.load(open('phase4_poc_plan.json')); print('Go/No-Go:', p['recommendation'])"
100```
101 
102**Templates:** Use `assets/poc_scorecard_template.md` for evaluation tracking.
103 
104**Output:** POC plan, evaluation scorecard, go/no-go recommendation.
105 
106**Validation checkpoint:** POC conversion requires scorecard score >60% across all evaluation dimensions (functionality, performance, integration, usability, support). If score <60%, document gaps and loop back to Phase 2 for solution redesign.
107 
108---
109 
110### Phase 5: Proposal & Closing
111 
112**Objective:** Deliver a technical proposal that supports the commercial close.
113 
114**Checklist:**
115- [ ] Compile POC results and success metrics
116- [ ] Create technical proposal with implementation plan
117- [ ] Address outstanding objections with evidence
118- [ ] Support pricing and packaging discussions
119- [ ] Conduct win/loss analysis post-decision
120 
121**Templates:** Use `assets/technical_proposal_template.md` for the proposal document.
122 
123**Output:** Technical proposal, implementation timeline, risk mitigation plan.
124 
125---
126 
127## Python Automation Tools
128 
129### 1. RFP Response Analyzer
130 
131**Script:** `scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py`
132 
133**Purpose:** Parse RFP/RFI requirements, score coverage, identify gaps, and generate bid/no-bid recommendations.
134 
135**Coverage Categories:** Full (100%), Partial (50%), Planned (25%), Gap (0%).
136**Priority Weighting:** Must-Have 3×, Should-Have 2×, Nice-to-Have 1×.
137 
138**Bid/No-Bid Logic:**
139- **Bid:** Coverage >70% AND must-have gaps ≤3
140- **Conditional Bid:** Coverage 50–70% OR must-have gaps 2–3
141- **No-Bid:** Coverage <50% OR must-have gaps >3
142 
143**Usage:**
144```bash
145python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json # human-readable
146python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json # JSON output
147python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py --help
148```
149 
150**Input Format:** See `assets/sample_rfp_data.json` for the complete schema.
151 
152---
153 
154### 2. Competitive Matrix Builder
155 
156**Script:** `scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py`
157 
158**Purpose:** Generate feature comparison matrices, calculate competitive scores, identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.
159 
160**Feature Scoring:** Full (3), Partial (2), Limited (1), None (0).
161 
162**Usage:**
163```bash
164python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json # human-readable
165python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json # JSON output
166```
167 
168**Output Includes:** Feature comparison matrix, weighted competitive scores, differentiators, vulnerabilities, and win themes.
169 
170---
171 
172### 3. POC Planner
173 
174**Script:** `scripts/poc_planner.py`
175 
176**Purpose:** Generate structured POC plans with timeline, resource allocation, success criteria, and evaluation scorecards.
177 
178**Default Phase Breakdown:**
179- **Week 1:** Setup — environment provisioning, data migration, configuration
180- **Weeks 2–3:** Core Testing — primary use cases, integration testing
181- **Week 4:** Advanced Testing — edge cases, performance, security
182- **Week 5:** Evaluation — scorecard completion, stakeholder review, go/no-go
183 
184**Usage:**
185```bash
186python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json # human-readable
187python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json # JSON output
188```
189 
190**Output Includes:** Phased POC plan, resource allocation, success criteria, evaluation scorecard, risk register, and go/no-go recommendation framework.
191 
192---
193 
194## Reference Knowledge Bases
195 
196| Reference | Description |
197|-----------|-------------|
198| `references/rfp-response-guide.md` | RFP/RFI response best practices, compliance matrix, bid/no-bid framework |
199| `references/competitive-positioning-framework.md` | Competitive analysis methodology, battlecard creation, objection handling |
200| `references/poc-best-practices.md` | POC planning methodology, success criteria, evaluation frameworks |
201 
202## Asset Templates
203 
204| Template | Purpose |
205|----------|---------|
206| `assets/technical_proposal_template.md` | Technical proposal with executive summary, solution architecture, implementation plan |
207| `assets/demo_script_template.md` | Demo script with agenda, talking points, objection handling |
208| `assets/poc_scorecard_template.md` | POC evaluation scorecard with weighted scoring |
209| `assets/sample_rfp_data.json` | Sample RFP data for testing the analyzer |
210| `assets/expected_output.json` | Expected output from rfp_response_analyzer.py |
211 
212## Integration Points
213 
214- **Marketing Skills** - Leverage competitive intelligence and messaging frameworks from `marketing-skill/`
215- **Product Team** - Coordinate on roadmap items flagged as "Planned" in RFP analysis from `product-team/`
216- **C-Level Advisory** - Escalate strategic deals requiring executive engagement from `c-level-advisor/`
217- **Customer Success** - Hand off POC results and success criteria to CSM from `../customer-success-manager/`
218 
219---
220 
221**Last Updated:** February 2026
222**Status:** Production-ready
223**Tools:** 3 Python automation scripts
224**References:** 3 knowledge base documents
225**Templates:** 5 asset files
226 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Aug 30, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 26,349
Checked
Source
alirezarezvani/claude-skills ↗
Creator
alirezarezvani · 363 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
SkillCurated aphorism collection with CRUDAphorismsdanielmiessler/LifeOS · by danielmiesslerCurated aphorism collection with CRUD — content-based matching, themed search, thinker research, DB maintenance. Quotes organized by author/theme/context/usage to prevent repetition. Four workflows: FindAphorism, AddAphorism, ResearchThinker, SearchAphorisms. Themes: Stoicism, Wisdom, Truth-seeking, Excellence, Resilience, Curiosity. USE WHEN aphorism, quote, find a quote, research thinker, add aphorism, quote for newsletter, what did X say about, quote bank. NOT FOR creative writing or social posts.★ 19.3k GitHub starsSkillNegotiates a commercial deal without giving away the termsDeal negotiationcbrock84/headcount · by cbrock84Negotiates a commercial deal without giving away the terms that matter — preparing your walk-away and theirs, trading concessions rather than conceding them, recognizing the tactics that create false urgency, protecting price by moving other variables, and closing on terms someone can actually deliver. Use this to prepare for a negotiation, respond to a demand mid-deal, work out why discounts keep landing at quarter end, or review terms before they are signed.★ 2k GitHub starsSkillInfluence and negotiation toolkit for any interactionsamber/cc-skills · by samberInfluence and negotiation toolkit for any interaction needing another person's agreement, even when the user never says 'negotiation'. Covers B2B sales, salary reviews and raise asks, collective bargaining and unions, hard 1:1s, recruitment closes, cross-cultural deals, mediation, and diplomatic messages — declining, pushing back on scope, justifying a delay, raising a concern, getting alignment. Use when the user says 'they just said X, what do I say' or 'draft a reply', or mentions a buyer, champion, procurement, RFP, sponsor, HR, union, or candidate, or a pushback, refusal, ghosting, no-decision, escalation, fixed budget, counter-offer, comp band, strike, BATNA, anchor, or concession.★ 222 GitHub starsSkillCreates professional case studies, engagement summariesCase Study Builder Assistantrealjaymes/marketingagentskills · by realjaymesCreates professional case studies, engagement summaries, and project summaries. Use when the user wants to create a 'case study,' 'client success story,' 'engagement summary,' 'project summary,' or 'portfolio piece.'★ 65 GitHub starsSkillReview and redesign an app or website UI to strip outUnslop designmarcosnovo/unslop-design · by marcosnovoReview and redesign an app or website UI to strip out the "slop" (decorative accent color, gradients, glows, noisy badges, emoji as icons, eyeballed spacing, greetings as titles, Title Case, flat hierarchy, repeated numbers) with a system (spacing, type, color roles, elevation) and two modes: a quick five-fix pass for one screen, or an orchestrated process for a whole app (parallel reviewers, a published winning proposal, devs per area, audits, PR). Covers SwiftUI, Compose and web (dashboards, landing pages, Tailwind), with scripts that scan the code, measure the rendered page and score it from 0 to 100. Use it when asked to "review the design", "make it look less AI", "unslop", "polish this screen", "design review", "winning proposal", "audit this dashboard", or when given videos or screenshots of an app or site asking for feedback or a redesign. Also use it to start a design system (spacing, type, palette, shadow scales) or to audit tokens, contrast or consistency across screens.★ 14 GitHub starsSkillTurn any YouTube video into a beautiful case-study📊 YouTube to Case Studytstfully/youtube-to-case-study · by tstfullyTurn any YouTube video (founder interview, product teardown, conference talk, marketing breakdown, UX walkthrough, podcast) into a beautiful case-study slideshow: one HTML file that opens in any browser, built on reveal.js, with speaker notes and every fact linked to the exact second in the video. Use this skill whenever someone wants a case study, business case study, marketing case study, UX case study, product teardown, growth teardown, competitor breakdown, swipe file, lesson deck, or presentation / slides / deck from a YouTube video or link. Also trigger on 'turn this video into a case study', 'make slides from this YouTube video', 'case study from this talk', 'teardown of this video', 'youtube to slides', 'youtube to presentation', or 'summarize this video as a deck'. Works for marketers, educators, product managers, students, and consultants; no coding needed.★ 3 GitHub stars

More from alirezarezvani

SkillResume a paused experiment/ar:ar-resume — Resume Experimentalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniResume a paused experiment. Checkout the experiment branch, read results history, continue iterating. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-resume or asks to pick up a previously started autoresearch experiment.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops/ar:ar-status — Experiment Dashboardalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops, and progress. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-status or asks how an autoresearch experiment is going.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected/ar:loop — Autonomous Experiment Loopalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected interval (10min, 1h, daily, weekly, monthly). Uses CronCreate for scheduling. Use when the user runs /ar:loop or asks to run an autoresearch experiment continuously on a schedule.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillRun a single experiment iteration/ar:run — Single Experiment Iterationalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniRun a single experiment iteration. Edit the target file, evaluate, keep or discard. Use when the user runs /ar:run or asks for one manual autoresearch iteration.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively/ar:setup — Create New Experimentalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator. Use when the user runs /ar:setup or asks to start optimizing a file with the autoresearch loop.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkill/cs:boardroom <brief/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberationalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvani/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call.★ 26.3k GitHub stars