/cs:boardroom <brief
/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation

/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo.
---
name: "boardroom"
description: "/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call."
---
# /cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation
**Command:** `/cs:boardroom <brief-path>`
Runs the `board-meeting` skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the **heart of the plugin** — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.
## Pipeline Position
```
/cs:office-hours → /cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem
↑ you are here
```
Overview
Runs the board-meeting skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the heart of the plugin — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill boardroom -g -a claude-codemkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tar.gz/19392f7a0826 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 claude-skills-19392f7a0826/c-level-agents/skills/boardroomNew-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/e35c764b3d9ac8124352/boardroom.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\boardroom.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\boardroom.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md4.6 KB
Read the files here
alirezarezvani/
Shared references15SKILL.md reads these from elsewhere in the repo. Not in the ZIP.
- plugin.jsonc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/.claude-plugin/559 B
- devils-advocate.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/agents/5.9 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/board-prep/6.5 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/challenge/6.7 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/executive-mentor/7.0 KB
- board_dynamics.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/executive-mentor/references/11.3 KB
- crisis_playbook.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/executive-mentor/references/13.3 KB
- hard_things.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/executive-mentor/references/12.0 KB
- decision_matrix_scorer.pyc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/executive-mentor/scripts/17.3 KB
- stakeholder_mapper.pyc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/executive-mentor/scripts/19.8 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/hard-call/7.2 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/postmortem/7.8 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/executive-mentor/skills/stress-test/7.7 KB
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/skills/board-meeting/6.4 KB
- cs-chief-of-staff.mdc-level-agents/agents/5.5 KB
Show the full text135 lines
/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation
Command: /cs:boardroom <brief-path>
Runs the board-meeting skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the heart of the plugin — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.
Pipeline Position
/cs:office-hours → /cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem
↑ you are here
The 6 Phases (from board-meeting skill)
Phase 1 — Briefing
- Chief of Staff distributes the brief to all advisors marked in Affected Roles.
- Each advisor reads company-context.md + the brief.
- No discussion yet.
Phase 2 — Independent Thinking (ISOLATION)
- Critical: each advisor produces their position independently, without seeing others' positions.
- This prevents groupthink and surfaces dissent.
- Each writes: their voice's opening, recommendation, top 3 concerns, top 3 supports.
Phase 3 — Cross-Examination
- Positions revealed simultaneously.
- Each advisor critiques the others' positions on the dimensions they own:
- cs-cfo-advisor critiques the math
- cs-ciso-advisor critiques the risk
- cs-cpo-advisor critiques the JTBD
- cs-cmo-advisor critiques the positioning
- cs-cro-advisor critiques the revenue math
- etc.
Phase 4 — Devil's Advocate Pass
executive-mentor/devils-advocateagent runs/em:challengeon the leading option.- Surfaces three concerns with severity ratings.
Phase 5 — Synthesis
- Chief of Staff synthesizes: which option commands majority, what are unresolved dissents.
- Produces the board memo with recommendation + dissent.
Phase 6 — Decision Hand-off
- Memo is presented to the founder.
- Founder accepts, modifies, or rejects.
- Approved memo routes to
/cs:decidefor logging.
Output: Board Memo
Saved to ~/.claude/boardroom/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md:
# Board Memo: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Brief:** <link to /cs:brief file>
**Status:** AWAITING FOUNDER DECISION | APPROVED | REJECTED
## Question
[One sentence from the brief]
## Recommended Option
**<Option name>** — chosen because <synthesis reasoning>
## Vote Tally
| Advisor | Vote | One-Sentence Reason |
|---|---|---|
| cs-ceo-advisor | A | <reason> |
| cs-cfo-advisor | A | <reason> |
| cs-cto-advisor | B | <reason> |
| ... | | |
## Dissent
- **<dissenter>:** <unresolved concern>
## Devil's Advocate Concerns
1. **CRITICAL** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
2. **HIGH** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
3. **MEDIUM** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
## Success & Kill Criteria
[Copied from brief, refined by the panel]
## Recommended Decision Path
- `/cs:decide` → log the decision
- `/cs:execute` → 90-day plan
- `/cs:cross-eval` → multi-model sanity check (optional, high-stakes)
- `/cs:freeze N` → cooldown lock (optional, irreversible)
Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters
If advisors see each other's positions before forming their own, they anchor. Phase 2 isolation is the single highest-leverage practice in the board-meeting protocol — it surfaces the dissents that sycophancy would have suppressed.
Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain
gstack /autoplan |
/cs:boardroom |
|
|---|---|---|
| Roles | CEO → design → eng (3) | Up to 10 C-roles |
| Order | Sequential | Phase 2 isolation, then simultaneous |
| Dissent capture | Implicit | Explicit dissent column |
| Adversarial pass | No | Phase 4 devil's advocate |
| Output | Reviewed plan | Voted memo with dissent + kill criteria |
Workflow
- Read brief from
~/.claude/briefs/<file> - Identify affected roles
- Invoke each cs-* advisor independently (Phase 2)
- Collect positions
- Run cross-examination round (Phase 3)
- Run
/em:challengeon leading option (Phase 4) - Synthesize memo (Phase 5)
- Hand off to founder (Phase 6)
Routing
/cs:decide— log approved memo/cs:cross-eval— high-stakes second opinion/cs:freeze— cooldown lock
Related
- Agent:
cs-chief-of-staff - Skills:
board-meeting,executive-mentor
Version: 1.0.0
| 1 | |
| 2 | name "boardroom" |
| 3 | description "/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # /cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation |
| 7 | |
| 8 | **Command:** `/cs:boardroom <brief-path>` |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Runs the `board-meeting` skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the **heart of the plugin** — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ## Pipeline Position |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | /cs:office-hours → /cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem |
| 16 | ↑ you are here |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ## The 6 Phases (from board-meeting skill) |
| 20 | |
| 21 | ### Phase 1 — Briefing |
| 22 | Chief of Staff distributes the brief to all advisors marked in **Affected Roles**. |
| 23 | Each advisor reads company-context.md + the brief. |
| 24 | No discussion yet. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | ### Phase 2 — Independent Thinking (ISOLATION) |
| 27 | **Critical:** each advisor produces their position **independently**, without seeing others' positions. |
| 28 | This prevents groupthink and surfaces dissent. |
| 29 | Each writes: their voice's opening, recommendation, top 3 concerns, top 3 supports. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ### Phase 3 — Cross-Examination |
| 32 | Positions revealed simultaneously. |
| 33 | Each advisor critiques the others' positions on the dimensions they own: |
| 34 | cs-cfo-advisor critiques the math |
| 35 | cs-ciso-advisor critiques the risk |
| 36 | cs-cpo-advisor critiques the JTBD |
| 37 | cs-cmo-advisor critiques the positioning |
| 38 | cs-cro-advisor critiques the revenue math |
| 39 | etc. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ### Phase 4 — Devil's Advocate Pass |
| 42 | `executive-mentor/devils-advocate` agent runs `/em:challenge` on the leading option. |
| 43 | Surfaces three concerns with severity ratings. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | ### Phase 5 — Synthesis |
| 46 | Chief of Staff synthesizes: which option commands majority, what are unresolved dissents. |
| 47 | Produces the **board memo** with recommendation + dissent. |
| 48 | |
| 49 | ### Phase 6 — Decision Hand-off |
| 50 | Memo is presented to the founder. |
| 51 | Founder accepts, modifies, or rejects. |
| 52 | Approved memo routes to `/cs:decide` for logging. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | ## Output: Board Memo |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Saved to `~/.claude/boardroom/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`: |
| 57 | |
| 58 | |
| 59 | # Board Memo: <topic> |
| 60 | **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD |
| 61 | **Brief:** <link to /cs:brief file> |
| 62 | **Status:** AWAITING FOUNDER DECISION | APPROVED | REJECTED |
| 63 | |
| 64 | ## Question |
| 65 | [One sentence from the brief] |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ## Recommended Option |
| 68 | **<Option name>** — chosen because <synthesis reasoning> |
| 69 | |
| 70 | ## Vote Tally |
| 71 | | Advisor | Vote | One-Sentence Reason | |
| 72 | |---|---|---| |
| 73 | | cs-ceo-advisor | A | <reason> | |
| 74 | | cs-cfo-advisor | A | <reason> | |
| 75 | | cs-cto-advisor | B | <reason> | |
| 76 | | ... | | | |
| 77 | |
| 78 | ## Dissent |
| 79 | - **<dissenter>:** <unresolved concern> |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ## Devil's Advocate Concerns |
| 82 | 1. **CRITICAL** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan> |
| 83 | 2. **HIGH** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan> |
| 84 | 3. **MEDIUM** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan> |
| 85 | |
| 86 | ## Success & Kill Criteria |
| 87 | [Copied from brief, refined by the panel] |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ## Recommended Decision Path |
| 90 | - `/cs:decide` → log the decision |
| 91 | - `/cs:execute` → 90-day plan |
| 92 | - `/cs:cross-eval` → multi-model sanity check (optional, high-stakes) |
| 93 | - `/cs:freeze N` → cooldown lock (optional, irreversible) |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 96 | ## Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters |
| 97 | |
| 98 | If advisors see each other's positions before forming their own, they anchor. Phase 2 isolation is the single highest-leverage practice in the board-meeting protocol — it surfaces the dissents that sycophancy would have suppressed. |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ## Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain |
| 101 | |
| 102 | | | gstack `/autoplan` | `/cs:boardroom` | |
| 103 | |---|---|---| |
| 104 | | Roles | CEO → design → eng (3) | Up to 10 C-roles | |
| 105 | | Order | Sequential | Phase 2 isolation, then simultaneous | |
| 106 | | Dissent capture | Implicit | Explicit dissent column | |
| 107 | | Adversarial pass | No | Phase 4 devil's advocate | |
| 108 | | Output | Reviewed plan | Voted memo with dissent + kill criteria | |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ## Workflow |
| 111 | |
| 112 | Read brief from `~/.claude/briefs/<file>` |
| 113 | Identify affected roles |
| 114 | Invoke each cs-* advisor independently (Phase 2) |
| 115 | Collect positions |
| 116 | Run cross-examination round (Phase 3) |
| 117 | Run `/em:challenge` on leading option (Phase 4) |
| 118 | Synthesize memo (Phase 5) |
| 119 | Hand off to founder (Phase 6) |
| 120 | |
| 121 | ## Routing |
| 122 | |
| 123 | `/cs:decide` — log approved memo |
| 124 | `/cs:cross-eval` — high-stakes second opinion |
| 125 | `/cs:freeze` — cooldown lock |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ## Related |
| 128 | |
| 129 | Agent: [`cs-chief-of-staff`] |
| 130 | Skills: [`board-meeting`], [`executive-mentor`] |
| 131 | |
| 132 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | **Version:** 1.0.0 |
| 135 |
Details
- Updated
- Aug 30, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 26,349
- Checked
- Source
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills ↗
- Creator
- alirezarezvani · 363 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillBrand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks
SkillMap what our buyers believeAudience belief mapper
SkillPaste in your website and marketing copyBrand Voice Analysis and Guidelines Generation
SkillYour brand designerFounder brand
SkillAnalyze and rewrite content to strict brand voice guidelinesBrand voice enforcer
SkillAdapt one core brand voice coherently across every adBrand voice ad adaptationMore from alirezarezvani
SkillResume a paused experiment/ar:ar-resume — Resume Experiment
SkillShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops/ar:ar-status — Experiment Dashboard
SkillStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected/ar:loop — Autonomous Experiment Loop
SkillRun a single experiment iteration/ar:run — Single Experiment Iteration
SkillSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively/ar:setup — Create New Experiment
Skill/cs:brief <topic — Generate a one-page strategy brief/cs:brief — One-Page Strategy Brief