New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

/cs:boardroom <brief

/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation

by alirezarezvani · MIT license · ★ 26,349 on GitHub · updated Aug 30

/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation cover

/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo.

---
name: "boardroom"
description: "/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call."
---

# /cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation

**Command:** `/cs:boardroom <brief-path>`

Runs the `board-meeting` skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the **heart of the plugin** — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.

## Pipeline Position

```
/cs:office-hours  →  /cs:brief  →  /cs:boardroom  →  /cs:decide  →  /cs:execute  →  /cs:post-mortem
                                     ↑ you are here
```

Overview

Runs the board-meeting skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the heart of the plugin — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill boardroom -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tar.gz/19392f7a0826 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 claude-skills-19392f7a0826/c-level-agents/skills/boardroom
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/e35c764b3d9ac8124352/boardroom.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\boardroom.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\boardroom.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
Read the files here
alirezarezvani/19392f71 file
Shared references15SKILL.md reads these from elsewhere in the repo. Not in the ZIP.Get them on GitHub ↗
SKILL.md
Show the full text135 lines

/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation

Command: /cs:boardroom <brief-path>

Runs the board-meeting skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the heart of the plugin — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.

Pipeline Position

/cs:office-hours  →  /cs:brief  →  /cs:boardroom  →  /cs:decide  →  /cs:execute  →  /cs:post-mortem
                                     ↑ you are here

The 6 Phases (from board-meeting skill)

Phase 1 — Briefing
  • Chief of Staff distributes the brief to all advisors marked in Affected Roles.
  • Each advisor reads company-context.md + the brief.
  • No discussion yet.
Phase 2 — Independent Thinking (ISOLATION)
  • Critical: each advisor produces their position independently, without seeing others' positions.
  • This prevents groupthink and surfaces dissent.
  • Each writes: their voice's opening, recommendation, top 3 concerns, top 3 supports.
Phase 3 — Cross-Examination
  • Positions revealed simultaneously.
  • Each advisor critiques the others' positions on the dimensions they own:
    • cs-cfo-advisor critiques the math
    • cs-ciso-advisor critiques the risk
    • cs-cpo-advisor critiques the JTBD
    • cs-cmo-advisor critiques the positioning
    • cs-cro-advisor critiques the revenue math
    • etc.
Phase 4 — Devil's Advocate Pass
  • executive-mentor/devils-advocate agent runs /em:challenge on the leading option.
  • Surfaces three concerns with severity ratings.
Phase 5 — Synthesis
  • Chief of Staff synthesizes: which option commands majority, what are unresolved dissents.
  • Produces the board memo with recommendation + dissent.
Phase 6 — Decision Hand-off
  • Memo is presented to the founder.
  • Founder accepts, modifies, or rejects.
  • Approved memo routes to /cs:decide for logging.

Output: Board Memo

Saved to ~/.claude/boardroom/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md:

# Board Memo: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Brief:** <link to /cs:brief file>
**Status:** AWAITING FOUNDER DECISION | APPROVED | REJECTED

## Question
[One sentence from the brief]

## Recommended Option
**<Option name>** — chosen because <synthesis reasoning>

## Vote Tally
| Advisor | Vote | One-Sentence Reason |
|---|---|---|
| cs-ceo-advisor | A | <reason> |
| cs-cfo-advisor | A | <reason> |
| cs-cto-advisor | B | <reason> |
| ... | | |

## Dissent
- **<dissenter>:** <unresolved concern>

## Devil's Advocate Concerns
1. **CRITICAL** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
2. **HIGH** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
3. **MEDIUM** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>

## Success & Kill Criteria
[Copied from brief, refined by the panel]

## Recommended Decision Path
- `/cs:decide` → log the decision
- `/cs:execute` → 90-day plan
- `/cs:cross-eval` → multi-model sanity check (optional, high-stakes)
- `/cs:freeze N` → cooldown lock (optional, irreversible)

Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters

If advisors see each other's positions before forming their own, they anchor. Phase 2 isolation is the single highest-leverage practice in the board-meeting protocol — it surfaces the dissents that sycophancy would have suppressed.

Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain

gstack /autoplan /cs:boardroom
Roles CEO → design → eng (3) Up to 10 C-roles
Order Sequential Phase 2 isolation, then simultaneous
Dissent capture Implicit Explicit dissent column
Adversarial pass No Phase 4 devil's advocate
Output Reviewed plan Voted memo with dissent + kill criteria

Workflow

  1. Read brief from ~/.claude/briefs/<file>
  2. Identify affected roles
  3. Invoke each cs-* advisor independently (Phase 2)
  4. Collect positions
  5. Run cross-examination round (Phase 3)
  6. Run /em:challenge on leading option (Phase 4)
  7. Synthesize memo (Phase 5)
  8. Hand off to founder (Phase 6)

Routing

  • /cs:decide — log approved memo
  • /cs:cross-eval — high-stakes second opinion
  • /cs:freeze — cooldown lock

Version: 1.0.0

1---
2name: "boardroom"
3description: "/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call."
4---
5 
6# /cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation
7 
8**Command:** `/cs:boardroom <brief-path>`
9 
10Runs the `board-meeting` skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the **heart of the plugin** — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.
11 
12## Pipeline Position
13 
14```
15/cs:office-hours → /cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem
16 ↑ you are here
17```
18 
19## The 6 Phases (from board-meeting skill)
20 
21### Phase 1 — Briefing
22- Chief of Staff distributes the brief to all advisors marked in **Affected Roles**.
23- Each advisor reads company-context.md + the brief.
24- No discussion yet.
25 
26### Phase 2 — Independent Thinking (ISOLATION)
27- **Critical:** each advisor produces their position **independently**, without seeing others' positions.
28- This prevents groupthink and surfaces dissent.
29- Each writes: their voice's opening, recommendation, top 3 concerns, top 3 supports.
30 
31### Phase 3 — Cross-Examination
32- Positions revealed simultaneously.
33- Each advisor critiques the others' positions on the dimensions they own:
34 - cs-cfo-advisor critiques the math
35 - cs-ciso-advisor critiques the risk
36 - cs-cpo-advisor critiques the JTBD
37 - cs-cmo-advisor critiques the positioning
38 - cs-cro-advisor critiques the revenue math
39 - etc.
40 
41### Phase 4 — Devil's Advocate Pass
42- `executive-mentor/devils-advocate` agent runs `/em:challenge` on the leading option.
43- Surfaces three concerns with severity ratings.
44 
45### Phase 5 — Synthesis
46- Chief of Staff synthesizes: which option commands majority, what are unresolved dissents.
47- Produces the **board memo** with recommendation + dissent.
48 
49### Phase 6 — Decision Hand-off
50- Memo is presented to the founder.
51- Founder accepts, modifies, or rejects.
52- Approved memo routes to `/cs:decide` for logging.
53 
54## Output: Board Memo
55 
56Saved to `~/.claude/boardroom/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`:
57 
58```markdown
59# Board Memo: <topic>
60**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
61**Brief:** <link to /cs:brief file>
62**Status:** AWAITING FOUNDER DECISION | APPROVED | REJECTED
63 
64## Question
65[One sentence from the brief]
66 
67## Recommended Option
68**<Option name>** — chosen because <synthesis reasoning>
69 
70## Vote Tally
71| Advisor | Vote | One-Sentence Reason |
72|---|---|---|
73| cs-ceo-advisor | A | <reason> |
74| cs-cfo-advisor | A | <reason> |
75| cs-cto-advisor | B | <reason> |
76| ... | | |
77 
78## Dissent
79- **<dissenter>:** <unresolved concern>
80 
81## Devil's Advocate Concerns
821. **CRITICAL** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
832. **HIGH** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
843. **MEDIUM** — <concern> — Mitigation: <plan>
85 
86## Success & Kill Criteria
87[Copied from brief, refined by the panel]
88 
89## Recommended Decision Path
90- `/cs:decide` → log the decision
91- `/cs:execute` → 90-day plan
92- `/cs:cross-eval` → multi-model sanity check (optional, high-stakes)
93- `/cs:freeze N` → cooldown lock (optional, irreversible)
94```
95 
96## Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters
97 
98If advisors see each other's positions before forming their own, they anchor. Phase 2 isolation is the single highest-leverage practice in the board-meeting protocol — it surfaces the dissents that sycophancy would have suppressed.
99 
100## Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain
101 
102| | gstack `/autoplan` | `/cs:boardroom` |
103|---|---|---|
104| Roles | CEO → design → eng (3) | Up to 10 C-roles |
105| Order | Sequential | Phase 2 isolation, then simultaneous |
106| Dissent capture | Implicit | Explicit dissent column |
107| Adversarial pass | No | Phase 4 devil's advocate |
108| Output | Reviewed plan | Voted memo with dissent + kill criteria |
109 
110## Workflow
111 
1121. Read brief from `~/.claude/briefs/<file>`
1132. Identify affected roles
1143. Invoke each cs-* advisor independently (Phase 2)
1154. Collect positions
1165. Run cross-examination round (Phase 3)
1176. Run `/em:challenge` on leading option (Phase 4)
1187. Synthesize memo (Phase 5)
1198. Hand off to founder (Phase 6)
120 
121## Routing
122 
123- `/cs:decide` — log approved memo
124- `/cs:cross-eval` — high-stakes second opinion
125- `/cs:freeze` — cooldown lock
126 
127## Related
128 
129- Agent: [`cs-chief-of-staff`](../../agents/cs-chief-of-staff.md)
130- Skills: [`board-meeting`](../../../c-level-advisor/skills/board-meeting/SKILL.md), [`executive-mentor`](../../../c-level-advisor/executive-mentor/)
131 
132---
133 
134**Version:** 1.0.0
135 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Aug 30, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 26,349
Checked
Source
alirezarezvani/claude-skills ↗
Creator
alirezarezvani · 363 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
SkillBrand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworksnextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skill · by nextlevelbuilderBrand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency. Activate for branded content, tone of voice, marketing assets, brand compliance, style guides.★ 130k GitHub starsSkillMap what our buyers believeAudience belief mapperaaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills · by aaron-he-zhuUse when the user asks to "map what our buyers believe", "capture the objections we keep hearing", or "find the switching forces that move the beachhead"; produces a belief map of the beachhead — held beliefs and mental models, the recurring objections and their reframes, and the JTBD four forces (push of the problem, pull of the new, anxiety of switching, habit of the present) — each item sourced from interviews or win-loss notes (User-provided) and labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, with any unverified quote or comparative claim marked "[needs source]" and routed to the claims candidates, never adjudicated here. Not for demographic or persona profiling — use audience-mapper; not for the positioning canvas — use positioning-truth-tracer. 受众信念/异议地图/切换四力/流失语言★ 2.9k GitHub starsSkillPaste in your website and marketing copyBrand Voice Analysis and Guidelines Generationzubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude · by zubair-trabzadaPaste in your website and marketing copy, and get back a clear guide anyone on your team can follow to sound like your brand every time.★ 2.7k GitHub starsSkillYour brand designerFounder brandJakeschincariol/founder-skill · by JakeschincariolYour brand designer. Names the business (with the trademark, domain and handle checks to run before falling in love with a name), writes the voice, a one-line promise and a tagline, and briefs the look: colours, type, logo and the first things a customer sees, so they match the positioning the marketing director chose. Use when the user says "name my business", "brand this", "logo", "brand identity", "what should it look like", "tagline", or "brand voice".★ 322 GitHub starsSkillAnalyze and rewrite content to strict brand voice guidelinesBrand voice enforcerwriter/skills · by writerAnalyze and rewrite content to strict brand voice guidelines, scoring adherence across tone, vocabulary, syntax patterns, and persona alignment for CPG and retail brands.★ 7 GitHub starsSkillAdapt one core brand voice coherently across every adBrand voice ad adaptationgmmh1/claude-paid-media-skills · by gmmh1Adapt one core brand voice coherently across every ad platform's native register — professional on LinkedIn, native/casual on TikTok, conversational on Meta, direct on Google Search. Triggers on 'does this still sound like us', 'adapt our brand voice for TikTok', 'keep our voice consistent across ad platforms', or 'this ad doesn't sound on-brand'. Cross-platform consistency layer feeding every platform's copywriting skill.New listing

More from alirezarezvani

SkillResume a paused experiment/ar:ar-resume — Resume Experimentalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniResume a paused experiment. Checkout the experiment branch, read results history, continue iterating. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-resume or asks to pick up a previously started autoresearch experiment.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops/ar:ar-status — Experiment Dashboardalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops, and progress. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-status or asks how an autoresearch experiment is going.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected/ar:loop — Autonomous Experiment Loopalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected interval (10min, 1h, daily, weekly, monthly). Uses CronCreate for scheduling. Use when the user runs /ar:loop or asks to run an autoresearch experiment continuously on a schedule.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillRun a single experiment iteration/ar:run — Single Experiment Iterationalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniRun a single experiment iteration. Edit the target file, evaluate, keep or discard. Use when the user runs /ar:run or asks for one manual autoresearch iteration.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively/ar:setup — Create New Experimentalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator. Use when the user runs /ar:setup or asks to start optimizing a file with the autoresearch loop.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkill/cs:brief <topic — Generate a one-page strategy brief/cs:brief — One-Page Strategy Briefalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvani/cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline. Use when a strategic question needs to be framed before boardroom deliberation — e.g. locking options, assumptions, and success criteria for a pricing change or a market-entry decision.★ 26.3k GitHub stars