Files of Product diagnostics through jtbd lens
wondelai/
diagnostics.md
Show the full text159 lines
Product Diagnostics Through JTBD Lens
Checklist: Do You Know Your Product's Job?
Level 1: Basic Understanding
- You can describe the job in one sentence without using the product name
- You know the circumstances in which the job arises
- You know what customer did BEFORE using your product
- You understand the functional, emotional, AND social dimensions
Level 2: Deep Understanding
- You know what you really compete with (not just "direct competitors")
- You understand push/pull and habit/anxiety forces for your customer
- You can distinguish Big Hire from Little Hire
- You know why customers "fire" your product
Level 3: Organizational Implementation
- Product decisions are filtered through the job lens
- Metrics measure job completion, not just usage
- Roadmap is oriented toward better job execution
- Team can articulate the customer's job
Red Flags - Signs You Don't Know the Job
- You describe product through features - "it's a tool for X with Y feature"
- Competition is only "similar products" - you don't see non-obvious competitors
- You segment by demographics - "target is men 25-35"
- High acquisition, low retention - you win Big Hire, lose Little Hire
- Customers use product "wrong" - they create workarounds
Diagnostic Framework
Why Aren't Customers Buying?
| Symptom | Probable Cause | Action |
|---|---|---|
| They don't know we exist | Job is poorly articulated in messaging | Rewrite messaging around the job |
| They know but don't try | Anxiety about new > Pull | Reduce friction, offer guarantees |
| They try but don't buy | Product doesn't do the job | Investigate gap between promise and reality |
| They buy but don't use | Little Hire lost | Redesign the moment of use |
| They use but churn | Job changed or better "employee" appeared | Investigate "firing" reasons |
"Firing" Interview (Churn Interview)
Questions for customers who left:
- "What did you do before us? Why did you come to us?"
- "What changed that made you start looking for alternatives?"
- "What ultimately convinced you to leave?"
- "What do you do now instead of us? Does it do the job better?"
- "If we could change one thing, what would it be?"
"Hiring" Interview (New Customer Interview)
Questions for new customers (within 2 weeks):
- "When did you first think about looking for a solution?"
- "What was the trigger - what was happening then?"
- "What alternatives did you look for? What disqualified them?"
- "What ultimately convinced you to choose us?"
- "What were you afraid of before buying?"
- "Is the product doing what you expected?"
JTBD Metrics
Instead of Traditional Metrics:
| Traditional Metric | Problem | JTBD Metric |
|---|---|---|
| DAU/MAU | Doesn't tell if job is being done | % of completed "jobs" |
| Time in app | More ≠ better | Time to job completion |
| Feature adoption | Features ≠ value | Does feature help with job? |
| NPS | General satisfaction | Would you hire us again for this job? |
| Churn rate | Retrospective | Leading indicators of "searching for alternatives" |
Job Completion Rate
Define what "job done" means and measure:
- % of sessions where job was completed
- Time to first success (Time to Value)
- Repeatability of "hiring" (hire frequency)
Post-Launch Iteration
Continuous Job Discovery
After launch, keep learning:
Usage data signals:
- Features used ≠ Features valued (may use out of necessity)
- Time spent ≠ Job done (frustration can increase time)
- Feature requests often describe solutions, not jobs
Ongoing research:
- Interview new customers within 2 weeks of purchase
- Interview churned customers within 1 week of leaving
- Observe actual usage (session recordings, support tickets)
- Track "aha moments" that predict retention
Iteration Framework
| Signal | What It Means | Action |
|---|---|---|
| High acquisition, low retention | Win Big Hire, lose Little Hire | Investigate moment of use |
| Feature used but low satisfaction | Functional works, emotional doesn't | Research emotional dimension |
| Unexpected use patterns | Hidden jobs emerging | Interview these users |
| Power users vs. casual users | Different jobs being done | May need segmentation |
Churn Analysis Through JTBD Lens
Why "Firing" Happens
Customers fire products when:
- Job changed - Circumstances evolved (company grew, life changed)
- Better "employee" appeared - Competitor does job better
- Job wasn't being done - Product never delivered on promise
- Friction accumulated - Too hard to use, not worth the effort
- Priorities shifted - Other jobs became more important
Churn Interview Framework
Timing: Within 1 week of cancellation (memory fresh)
Questions:
| Phase | Questions |
|---|---|
| Original hiring | "When you first signed up, what were you hoping to accomplish?" |
| Experience | "How well did we help you with that?" |
| The turn | "When did you start thinking about leaving?" |
| Alternatives | "What will you do instead? How did you find it?" |
| The switch | "What ultimately convinced you to leave?" |
| Retrospective | "If we could change one thing, what would make you stay?" |
Churn Patterns to Watch
| Pattern | Probable Cause | Investigation |
|---|---|---|
| Early churn (<30 days) | Never got job done | Onboarding + activation issues |
| Churn after initial success | Job completed, no ongoing need | Is this a one-time job? |
| Churn after competitor mention | Better employee exists | Competitive analysis |
| Churn with "too complicated" | Friction > value | UX and simplification |
| Churn without replacement | Job deprioritized | Were we targeting right customers? |
Acting on Churn Insights
If job changed: Consider segments, expansion products, or accepting churn as natural If competitor wins: Investigate which dimension they're serving better If job wasn't done: Product or onboarding needs improvement If friction accumulated: UX improvements, training, simplification If priorities shifted: May be targeting wrong customer profile
| 1 | # Product Diagnostics Through JTBD Lens |
| 2 | |
| 3 | ## Checklist: Do You Know Your Product's Job? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ### Level 1: Basic Understanding |
| 6 | |
| 7 | [ ] You can describe the job in one sentence without using the product name |
| 8 | [ ] You know the circumstances in which the job arises |
| 9 | [ ] You know what customer did BEFORE using your product |
| 10 | [ ] You understand the functional, emotional, AND social dimensions |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ### Level 2: Deep Understanding |
| 13 | |
| 14 | [ ] You know what you really compete with (not just "direct competitors") |
| 15 | [ ] You understand push/pull and habit/anxiety forces for your customer |
| 16 | [ ] You can distinguish Big Hire from Little Hire |
| 17 | [ ] You know why customers "fire" your product |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ### Level 3: Organizational Implementation |
| 20 | |
| 21 | [ ] Product decisions are filtered through the job lens |
| 22 | [ ] Metrics measure job completion, not just usage |
| 23 | [ ] Roadmap is oriented toward better job execution |
| 24 | [ ] Team can articulate the customer's job |
| 25 | |
| 26 | ## Red Flags - Signs You Don't Know the Job |
| 27 | |
| 28 | **You describe product through features** - "it's a tool for X with Y feature" |
| 29 | **Competition is only "similar products"** - you don't see non-obvious competitors |
| 30 | **You segment by demographics** - "target is men 25-35" |
| 31 | **High acquisition, low retention** - you win Big Hire, lose Little Hire |
| 32 | **Customers use product "wrong"** - they create workarounds |
| 33 | |
| 34 | ## Diagnostic Framework |
| 35 | |
| 36 | ### Why Aren't Customers Buying? |
| 37 | |
| 38 | | Symptom | Probable Cause | Action | |
| 39 | |---------|----------------|--------| |
| 40 | | They don't know we exist | Job is poorly articulated in messaging | Rewrite messaging around the job | |
| 41 | | They know but don't try | Anxiety about new > Pull | Reduce friction, offer guarantees | |
| 42 | | They try but don't buy | Product doesn't do the job | Investigate gap between promise and reality | |
| 43 | | They buy but don't use | Little Hire lost | Redesign the moment of use | |
| 44 | | They use but churn | Job changed or better "employee" appeared | Investigate "firing" reasons | |
| 45 | |
| 46 | ### "Firing" Interview (Churn Interview) |
| 47 | |
| 48 | Questions for customers who left: |
| 49 | |
| 50 | "What did you do before us? Why did you come to us?" |
| 51 | "What changed that made you start looking for alternatives?" |
| 52 | "What ultimately convinced you to leave?" |
| 53 | "What do you do now instead of us? Does it do the job better?" |
| 54 | "If we could change one thing, what would it be?" |
| 55 | |
| 56 | ### "Hiring" Interview (New Customer Interview) |
| 57 | |
| 58 | Questions for new customers (within 2 weeks): |
| 59 | |
| 60 | "When did you first think about looking for a solution?" |
| 61 | "What was the trigger - what was happening then?" |
| 62 | "What alternatives did you look for? What disqualified them?" |
| 63 | "What ultimately convinced you to choose us?" |
| 64 | "What were you afraid of before buying?" |
| 65 | "Is the product doing what you expected?" |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ## JTBD Metrics |
| 68 | |
| 69 | ### Instead of Traditional Metrics: |
| 70 | |
| 71 | | Traditional Metric | Problem | JTBD Metric | |
| 72 | |-------------------|---------|-------------| |
| 73 | | DAU/MAU | Doesn't tell if job is being done | % of completed "jobs" | |
| 74 | | Time in app | More ≠ better | Time to job completion | |
| 75 | | Feature adoption | Features ≠ value | Does feature help with job? | |
| 76 | | NPS | General satisfaction | Would you hire us again for this job? | |
| 77 | | Churn rate | Retrospective | Leading indicators of "searching for alternatives" | |
| 78 | |
| 79 | ### Job Completion Rate |
| 80 | |
| 81 | Define what "job done" means and measure: |
| 82 | % of sessions where job was completed |
| 83 | Time to first success (Time to Value) |
| 84 | Repeatability of "hiring" (hire frequency) |
| 85 | |
| 86 | |
| 87 | |
| 88 | ## Post-Launch Iteration |
| 89 | |
| 90 | ### Continuous Job Discovery |
| 91 | |
| 92 | After launch, keep learning: |
| 93 | |
| 94 | **Usage data signals:** |
| 95 | Features used ≠ Features valued (may use out of necessity) |
| 96 | Time spent ≠ Job done (frustration can increase time) |
| 97 | Feature requests often describe solutions, not jobs |
| 98 | |
| 99 | **Ongoing research:** |
| 100 | Interview new customers within 2 weeks of purchase |
| 101 | Interview churned customers within 1 week of leaving |
| 102 | Observe actual usage (session recordings, support tickets) |
| 103 | Track "aha moments" that predict retention |
| 104 | |
| 105 | ### Iteration Framework |
| 106 | |
| 107 | | Signal | What It Means | Action | |
| 108 | |--------|---------------|--------| |
| 109 | | High acquisition, low retention | Win Big Hire, lose Little Hire | Investigate moment of use | |
| 110 | | Feature used but low satisfaction | Functional works, emotional doesn't | Research emotional dimension | |
| 111 | | Unexpected use patterns | Hidden jobs emerging | Interview these users | |
| 112 | | Power users vs. casual users | Different jobs being done | May need segmentation | |
| 113 | |
| 114 | |
| 115 | |
| 116 | ## Churn Analysis Through JTBD Lens |
| 117 | |
| 118 | ### Why "Firing" Happens |
| 119 | |
| 120 | Customers fire products when: |
| 121 | **Job changed** - Circumstances evolved (company grew, life changed) |
| 122 | **Better "employee" appeared** - Competitor does job better |
| 123 | **Job wasn't being done** - Product never delivered on promise |
| 124 | **Friction accumulated** - Too hard to use, not worth the effort |
| 125 | **Priorities shifted** - Other jobs became more important |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ### Churn Interview Framework |
| 128 | |
| 129 | **Timing:** Within 1 week of cancellation (memory fresh) |
| 130 | |
| 131 | **Questions:** |
| 132 | |
| 133 | | Phase | Questions | |
| 134 | |-------|-----------| |
| 135 | | Original hiring | "When you first signed up, what were you hoping to accomplish?" | |
| 136 | | Experience | "How well did we help you with that?" | |
| 137 | | The turn | "When did you start thinking about leaving?" | |
| 138 | | Alternatives | "What will you do instead? How did you find it?" | |
| 139 | | The switch | "What ultimately convinced you to leave?" | |
| 140 | | Retrospective | "If we could change one thing, what would make you stay?" | |
| 141 | |
| 142 | ### Churn Patterns to Watch |
| 143 | |
| 144 | | Pattern | Probable Cause | Investigation | |
| 145 | |---------|----------------|---------------| |
| 146 | | Early churn (<30 days) | Never got job done | Onboarding + activation issues | |
| 147 | | Churn after initial success | Job completed, no ongoing need | Is this a one-time job? | |
| 148 | | Churn after competitor mention | Better employee exists | Competitive analysis | |
| 149 | | Churn with "too complicated" | Friction > value | UX and simplification | |
| 150 | | Churn without replacement | Job deprioritized | Were we targeting right customers? | |
| 151 | |
| 152 | ### Acting on Churn Insights |
| 153 | |
| 154 | **If job changed:** Consider segments, expansion products, or accepting churn as natural |
| 155 | **If competitor wins:** Investigate which dimension they're serving better |
| 156 | **If job wasn't done:** Product or onboarding needs improvement |
| 157 | **If friction accumulated:** UX improvements, training, simplification |
| 158 | **If priorities shifted:** May be targeting wrong customer profile |
| 159 |
Discussion
Browse more free Claude skills.