Leap of faith assumptions skill

Every startup is built on a stack of unproven assumptions.

by wondelai·MIT license·★ 2,235 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Files of Leap of faith assumptions

wondelai/main1 file
assumptions.md
Show the full text296 lines

Leap-of-Faith Assumptions

Every startup is built on a stack of unproven assumptions. Most founders treat these assumptions as facts. The Lean Startup treats them as hypotheses that must be tested systematically. Leap-of-faith assumptions are the assumptions that must be true for the business to succeed but have the least evidence supporting them. Identifying, prioritizing, and testing these assumptions is the foundation of validated learning.

Value Hypothesis vs Growth Hypothesis

The two most critical assumptions for any new product:

Value Hypothesis

Tests whether the product delivers value to customers once they start using it.

Core question: Do customers find this product valuable enough to keep using it (and eventually pay for it)?

Dimension What to Validate Example Signals
Problem existence The problem is real and painful enough to motivate action Customers describe the problem unprompted in interviews
Solution fit Your specific solution addresses the problem effectively Users complete core tasks successfully; retention is strong
Willingness to pay Customers value the solution enough to exchange money for it Pre-orders, paid pilots, conversion from free to paid
Frequency Customers need the solution repeatedly, not just once Return usage within expected timeframe
Growth Hypothesis

Tests how new customers discover and adopt the product.

Core question: How will this product spread from early adopters to a broader market?

Dimension What to Validate Example Signals
Discoverability Target customers can find the product Organic search traffic, word-of-mouth referrals
Acquisition cost You can acquire customers at a sustainable cost CAC below projected LTV
Virality Existing users bring in new users Viral coefficient, referral rates, social sharing
Market size Enough potential customers exist TAM analysis validated by early traction patterns

Critical insight: Validate the value hypothesis before the growth hypothesis. Growing something people do not value is the most expensive way to fail.

Assumption Mapping

Step 1: List All Assumptions

Brainstorm every assumption your business relies on. Use these categories as prompts:

Customer assumptions:

  • Our target customer is [specific persona]
  • They experience [specific problem]
  • They currently solve it by [current alternative]
  • They are dissatisfied with the current solution because [reason]

Problem assumptions:

  • The problem is frequent enough to justify a solution
  • The problem is painful enough that people will pay to solve it
  • The problem is not adequately solved by existing alternatives

Solution assumptions:

  • Our solution effectively addresses the problem
  • Customers can use our solution without extensive training
  • The solution is significantly better than alternatives

Business model assumptions:

  • Customers will pay [price] for this solution
  • We can acquire customers for less than [amount]
  • Customer lifetime value exceeds acquisition cost
  • Our market is large enough to build a viable business

Technical assumptions:

  • We can build this technology with our team
  • The technology can scale to serve our target market
  • Performance will meet customer expectations
Step 2: Prioritize With the Impact-Uncertainty Matrix

Plot each assumption on a 2x2 matrix:

                    HIGH IMPACT
                        |
         TEST FIRST     |     MONITOR
      (High Impact,     |  (High Impact,
       High Uncertainty) |   Low Uncertainty)
                        |
  HIGH UNCERTAINTY -----+------ LOW UNCERTAINTY
                        |
         EXPLORE        |      IGNORE
      (Low Impact,      |   (Low Impact,
       High Uncertainty) |   Low Uncertainty)
                        |
                    LOW IMPACT

Test First (top-left): These are your leap-of-faith assumptions. If wrong, the business fails. And you have little evidence they are true. Test these immediately.

Monitor (top-right): Important but you have reasonable evidence. Keep an eye on them but do not spend experiment cycles here yet.

Explore (bottom-left): Uncertain but not critical. Explore casually through customer conversations.

Ignore (bottom-right): Low impact and well-understood. Move on.

Assumption Prioritization Scoring

For a more structured approach, score each assumption:

Assumption Impact (1-5) Uncertainty (1-5) Priority Score Test Order
Customers will pay $29/month 5 5 25 1
Problem is frequent (weekly+) 5 4 20 2
Can acquire via content marketing 4 4 16 3
Team can build ML model 4 3 12 4
Users will share with colleagues 3 4 12 5
Market size is $1B+ 3 2 6 6

Impact (1-5): How critical is this assumption to the business succeeding? Uncertainty (1-5): How little evidence do you have? Priority Score: Impact multiplied by Uncertainty. Higher score = test sooner.

Testing Methods by Assumption Type

Customer Existence Assumptions
Method Duration Cost Signal Strength
Customer discovery interviews (20+) 2-3 weeks Low Medium
Landing page with targeted ads 1-2 weeks Low-Medium Medium-High
Community/forum observation 1 week Free Medium
Competitor customer analysis 1 week Free Low-Medium
Survey to target demographic 1-2 weeks Low Low (stated vs revealed preference)
Problem Severity Assumptions
Method Duration Cost Signal Strength
Problem interviews (focus on current behavior) 2-3 weeks Low High
Current spending on alternatives 1 week Free High
Time spent on workarounds 1-2 weeks Low High
Support ticket analysis (competitor or own) 1 week Free Medium
Job-to-be-done interviews 2-3 weeks Low High
Solution Effectiveness Assumptions
Method Duration Cost Signal Strength
Concierge MVP (5-10 customers) 2-4 weeks Low-Medium Very High
Wizard of Oz MVP 2-4 weeks Medium High
Clickable prototype usability test 1-2 weeks Low Medium
A/B test (existing product) 1-3 weeks Low High
Competitor product teardown 1 week Low Low-Medium
Business Model Assumptions
Method Duration Cost Signal Strength
Pre-sell / pre-order 2-4 weeks Medium Very High
Pricing page test (before product) 1-2 weeks Low High
Willingness-to-pay interviews 1-2 weeks Low Medium
Competitive pricing analysis 1 week Free Low-Medium
Paid pilot with letter of intent 2-6 weeks Medium Very High
Growth Assumptions
Method Duration Cost Signal Strength
Paid acquisition test ($500-2000) 1-2 weeks Medium High
Referral program MVP 2-4 weeks Low High
Content marketing experiment 4-8 weeks Low Medium
Partnership outreach (10+ partners) 2-4 weeks Low Medium
Viral loop prototype 2-3 weeks Medium High

Assumption Mapping Template

ASSUMPTION MAP
==============
Product: ____________________
Date: ____________________
Team: ____________________

LEAP-OF-FAITH ASSUMPTIONS (Test First)
---------------------------------------
1. Assumption: ____________________
   Category: [ ] Customer  [ ] Problem  [ ] Solution  [ ] Business Model  [ ] Growth
   Impact: ___/5    Uncertainty: ___/5    Priority: ___
   Test method: ____________________
   Success criteria: ____________________
   Timeline: ____________________

2. Assumption: ____________________
   Category: [ ] Customer  [ ] Problem  [ ] Solution  [ ] Business Model  [ ] Growth
   Impact: ___/5    Uncertainty: ___/5    Priority: ___
   Test method: ____________________
   Success criteria: ____________________
   Timeline: ____________________

3. Assumption: ____________________
   Category: [ ] Customer  [ ] Problem  [ ] Solution  [ ] Business Model  [ ] Growth
   Impact: ___/5    Uncertainty: ___/5    Priority: ___
   Test method: ____________________
   Success criteria: ____________________
   Timeline: ____________________

IMPORTANT BUT LESS UNCERTAIN (Monitor)
--------------------------------------
4. ____________________
5. ____________________

EXPLORE LATER
-------------
6. ____________________
7. ____________________

Industry-Specific Common Assumptions

SaaS
Assumption Typical Risk Level Testing Approach
Users will adopt a new tool (switching cost) High Free trial conversion rate
Monthly subscription is preferred over annual Medium Pricing page A/B test
Self-serve onboarding is sufficient High Onboarding completion funnel
Integration with existing tools is required Medium Customer interviews about workflow
Freemium will drive paid conversions High Cohort analysis of free-to-paid
SMBs will pay without a sales call Medium Self-serve purchase funnel test
Marketplace
Assumption Typical Risk Level Testing Approach
Supply side will join the platform Very High Manual recruitment of 20-50 suppliers
Demand exists at the listed price High Smoke test landing page
Both sides show up at the same time Very High Single-geography concierge test
Trust can be established between strangers High Review/rating system MVP
Take rate is acceptable to both sides Medium Pricing experiments with early users
Network effects will kick in at scale High Measure engagement vs density
B2B Enterprise
Assumption Typical Risk Level Testing Approach
Budget holder will champion internally Very High Pilot with 3-5 companies
IT will approve the integration High Technical review with 5 IT leaders
ROI justifies the price point High Case study from pilot
Procurement timeline is acceptable Medium Sales cycle measurement
End users will adopt without mandate High User adoption in pilot companies
Data security requirements can be met Medium Security audit and certification plan
Consumer Mobile
Assumption Typical Risk Level Testing Approach
Users will download yet another app Very High App store listing test or landing page
Daily active usage will occur Very High Day-1, Day-7, Day-30 retention cohorts
Notifications will not be disabled High Notification opt-in rate tracking
Users will create content/data High First-session completion rate
Monetization will not kill engagement High A/B test monetization features
Organic sharing will occur Medium Share button usage, invite rate

From Assumptions to Experiments

The Bridge

Each high-priority assumption must be converted into a testable experiment using this process:

  1. State the assumption clearly. "We assume that ____."
  2. Identify the riskiest element. What part of this assumption, if wrong, would be most damaging?
  3. Formulate a falsifiable hypothesis. "If we ____, then ____ will happen within ____."
  4. Choose the fastest test method. What is the minimum effort that generates a meaningful signal?
  5. Set pass/fail criteria in advance. "Success = ____. Failure = ____."
  6. Run the experiment.
  7. Record the result and decide. Persevere, pivot, or dig deeper.
Example Bridge

Assumption: Remote teams need asynchronous video messaging.

Riskiest element: Do remote teams actually feel pain around asynchronous communication, or are Slack and email sufficient?

Hypothesis: If we post a landing page describing async video messaging in 5 remote-work communities, at least 3% of visitors will sign up for the waitlist within 2 weeks.

Test method: Landing page with Mailchimp signup. $200 in targeted ads as supplement to organic posts.

Pass/fail: Above 3% signup rate with 500+ visitors = proceed. Below 3% = interview signups to understand why, then reassess.

Result: 4.2% signup rate. 21 signups. 8 responded to follow-up email. 5 described specific pain points with existing tools.

Decision: Assumption partially validated. Proceed to concierge MVP with the 8 respondents to validate solution fit.

Sequencing Experiments

Test assumptions in this order:

  1. Customer and problem assumptions first. If the problem does not exist or the customer does not care, nothing else matters.
  2. Solution assumptions second. Does your approach actually solve the problem?
  3. Business model assumptions third. Can you make money?
  4. Growth assumptions last. Can you scale?

This sequence prevents the most expensive mistake: building and scaling a solution to a problem nobody has.

1# Leap-of-Faith Assumptions
2 
3Every startup is built on a stack of unproven assumptions. Most founders treat these assumptions as facts. The Lean Startup treats them as hypotheses that must be tested systematically. Leap-of-faith assumptions are the assumptions that must be true for the business to succeed but have the least evidence supporting them. Identifying, prioritizing, and testing these assumptions is the foundation of validated learning.
4 
5## Value Hypothesis vs Growth Hypothesis
6 
7The two most critical assumptions for any new product:
8 
9### Value Hypothesis
10 
11Tests whether the product delivers value to customers once they start using it.
12 
13**Core question:** Do customers find this product valuable enough to keep using it (and eventually pay for it)?
14 
15| Dimension | What to Validate | Example Signals |
16|-----------|-----------------|-----------------|
17| Problem existence | The problem is real and painful enough to motivate action | Customers describe the problem unprompted in interviews |
18| Solution fit | Your specific solution addresses the problem effectively | Users complete core tasks successfully; retention is strong |
19| Willingness to pay | Customers value the solution enough to exchange money for it | Pre-orders, paid pilots, conversion from free to paid |
20| Frequency | Customers need the solution repeatedly, not just once | Return usage within expected timeframe |
21 
22### Growth Hypothesis
23 
24Tests how new customers discover and adopt the product.
25 
26**Core question:** How will this product spread from early adopters to a broader market?
27 
28| Dimension | What to Validate | Example Signals |
29|-----------|-----------------|-----------------|
30| Discoverability | Target customers can find the product | Organic search traffic, word-of-mouth referrals |
31| Acquisition cost | You can acquire customers at a sustainable cost | CAC below projected LTV |
32| Virality | Existing users bring in new users | Viral coefficient, referral rates, social sharing |
33| Market size | Enough potential customers exist | TAM analysis validated by early traction patterns |
34 
35**Critical insight:** Validate the value hypothesis before the growth hypothesis. Growing something people do not value is the most expensive way to fail.
36 
37## Assumption Mapping
38 
39### Step 1: List All Assumptions
40 
41Brainstorm every assumption your business relies on. Use these categories as prompts:
42 
43**Customer assumptions:**
44- Our target customer is [specific persona]
45- They experience [specific problem]
46- They currently solve it by [current alternative]
47- They are dissatisfied with the current solution because [reason]
48 
49**Problem assumptions:**
50- The problem is frequent enough to justify a solution
51- The problem is painful enough that people will pay to solve it
52- The problem is not adequately solved by existing alternatives
53 
54**Solution assumptions:**
55- Our solution effectively addresses the problem
56- Customers can use our solution without extensive training
57- The solution is significantly better than alternatives
58 
59**Business model assumptions:**
60- Customers will pay [price] for this solution
61- We can acquire customers for less than [amount]
62- Customer lifetime value exceeds acquisition cost
63- Our market is large enough to build a viable business
64 
65**Technical assumptions:**
66- We can build this technology with our team
67- The technology can scale to serve our target market
68- Performance will meet customer expectations
69 
70### Step 2: Prioritize With the Impact-Uncertainty Matrix
71 
72Plot each assumption on a 2x2 matrix:
73 
74```
75 HIGH IMPACT
76 |
77 TEST FIRST | MONITOR
78 (High Impact, | (High Impact,
79 High Uncertainty) | Low Uncertainty)
80 |
81 HIGH UNCERTAINTY -----+------ LOW UNCERTAINTY
82 |
83 EXPLORE | IGNORE
84 (Low Impact, | (Low Impact,
85 High Uncertainty) | Low Uncertainty)
86 |
87 LOW IMPACT
88```
89 
90**Test First (top-left):** These are your leap-of-faith assumptions. If wrong, the business fails. And you have little evidence they are true. Test these immediately.
91 
92**Monitor (top-right):** Important but you have reasonable evidence. Keep an eye on them but do not spend experiment cycles here yet.
93 
94**Explore (bottom-left):** Uncertain but not critical. Explore casually through customer conversations.
95 
96**Ignore (bottom-right):** Low impact and well-understood. Move on.
97 
98## Assumption Prioritization Scoring
99 
100For a more structured approach, score each assumption:
101 
102| Assumption | Impact (1-5) | Uncertainty (1-5) | Priority Score | Test Order |
103|-----------|-------------|-------------------|---------------|------------|
104| Customers will pay $29/month | 5 | 5 | 25 | 1 |
105| Problem is frequent (weekly+) | 5 | 4 | 20 | 2 |
106| Can acquire via content marketing | 4 | 4 | 16 | 3 |
107| Team can build ML model | 4 | 3 | 12 | 4 |
108| Users will share with colleagues | 3 | 4 | 12 | 5 |
109| Market size is $1B+ | 3 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
110 
111**Impact (1-5):** How critical is this assumption to the business succeeding?
112**Uncertainty (1-5):** How little evidence do you have?
113**Priority Score:** Impact multiplied by Uncertainty. Higher score = test sooner.
114 
115## Testing Methods by Assumption Type
116 
117### Customer Existence Assumptions
118 
119| Method | Duration | Cost | Signal Strength |
120|--------|----------|------|-----------------|
121| Customer discovery interviews (20+) | 2-3 weeks | Low | Medium |
122| Landing page with targeted ads | 1-2 weeks | Low-Medium | Medium-High |
123| Community/forum observation | 1 week | Free | Medium |
124| Competitor customer analysis | 1 week | Free | Low-Medium |
125| Survey to target demographic | 1-2 weeks | Low | Low (stated vs revealed preference) |
126 
127### Problem Severity Assumptions
128 
129| Method | Duration | Cost | Signal Strength |
130|--------|----------|------|-----------------|
131| Problem interviews (focus on current behavior) | 2-3 weeks | Low | High |
132| Current spending on alternatives | 1 week | Free | High |
133| Time spent on workarounds | 1-2 weeks | Low | High |
134| Support ticket analysis (competitor or own) | 1 week | Free | Medium |
135| Job-to-be-done interviews | 2-3 weeks | Low | High |
136 
137### Solution Effectiveness Assumptions
138 
139| Method | Duration | Cost | Signal Strength |
140|--------|----------|------|-----------------|
141| Concierge MVP (5-10 customers) | 2-4 weeks | Low-Medium | Very High |
142| Wizard of Oz MVP | 2-4 weeks | Medium | High |
143| Clickable prototype usability test | 1-2 weeks | Low | Medium |
144| A/B test (existing product) | 1-3 weeks | Low | High |
145| Competitor product teardown | 1 week | Low | Low-Medium |
146 
147### Business Model Assumptions
148 
149| Method | Duration | Cost | Signal Strength |
150|--------|----------|------|-----------------|
151| Pre-sell / pre-order | 2-4 weeks | Medium | Very High |
152| Pricing page test (before product) | 1-2 weeks | Low | High |
153| Willingness-to-pay interviews | 1-2 weeks | Low | Medium |
154| Competitive pricing analysis | 1 week | Free | Low-Medium |
155| Paid pilot with letter of intent | 2-6 weeks | Medium | Very High |
156 
157### Growth Assumptions
158 
159| Method | Duration | Cost | Signal Strength |
160|--------|----------|------|-----------------|
161| Paid acquisition test ($500-2000) | 1-2 weeks | Medium | High |
162| Referral program MVP | 2-4 weeks | Low | High |
163| Content marketing experiment | 4-8 weeks | Low | Medium |
164| Partnership outreach (10+ partners) | 2-4 weeks | Low | Medium |
165| Viral loop prototype | 2-3 weeks | Medium | High |
166 
167## Assumption Mapping Template
168 
169```
170ASSUMPTION MAP
171==============
172Product: ____________________
173Date: ____________________
174Team: ____________________
175 
176LEAP-OF-FAITH ASSUMPTIONS (Test First)
177---------------------------------------
1781. Assumption: ____________________
179 Category: [ ] Customer [ ] Problem [ ] Solution [ ] Business Model [ ] Growth
180 Impact: ___/5 Uncertainty: ___/5 Priority: ___
181 Test method: ____________________
182 Success criteria: ____________________
183 Timeline: ____________________
184 
1852. Assumption: ____________________
186 Category: [ ] Customer [ ] Problem [ ] Solution [ ] Business Model [ ] Growth
187 Impact: ___/5 Uncertainty: ___/5 Priority: ___
188 Test method: ____________________
189 Success criteria: ____________________
190 Timeline: ____________________
191 
1923. Assumption: ____________________
193 Category: [ ] Customer [ ] Problem [ ] Solution [ ] Business Model [ ] Growth
194 Impact: ___/5 Uncertainty: ___/5 Priority: ___
195 Test method: ____________________
196 Success criteria: ____________________
197 Timeline: ____________________
198 
199IMPORTANT BUT LESS UNCERTAIN (Monitor)
200--------------------------------------
2014. ____________________
2025. ____________________
203 
204EXPLORE LATER
205-------------
2066. ____________________
2077. ____________________
208```
209 
210## Industry-Specific Common Assumptions
211 
212### SaaS
213 
214| Assumption | Typical Risk Level | Testing Approach |
215|-----------|-------------------|------------------|
216| Users will adopt a new tool (switching cost) | High | Free trial conversion rate |
217| Monthly subscription is preferred over annual | Medium | Pricing page A/B test |
218| Self-serve onboarding is sufficient | High | Onboarding completion funnel |
219| Integration with existing tools is required | Medium | Customer interviews about workflow |
220| Freemium will drive paid conversions | High | Cohort analysis of free-to-paid |
221| SMBs will pay without a sales call | Medium | Self-serve purchase funnel test |
222 
223### Marketplace
224 
225| Assumption | Typical Risk Level | Testing Approach |
226|-----------|-------------------|------------------|
227| Supply side will join the platform | Very High | Manual recruitment of 20-50 suppliers |
228| Demand exists at the listed price | High | Smoke test landing page |
229| Both sides show up at the same time | Very High | Single-geography concierge test |
230| Trust can be established between strangers | High | Review/rating system MVP |
231| Take rate is acceptable to both sides | Medium | Pricing experiments with early users |
232| Network effects will kick in at scale | High | Measure engagement vs density |
233 
234### B2B Enterprise
235 
236| Assumption | Typical Risk Level | Testing Approach |
237|-----------|-------------------|------------------|
238| Budget holder will champion internally | Very High | Pilot with 3-5 companies |
239| IT will approve the integration | High | Technical review with 5 IT leaders |
240| ROI justifies the price point | High | Case study from pilot |
241| Procurement timeline is acceptable | Medium | Sales cycle measurement |
242| End users will adopt without mandate | High | User adoption in pilot companies |
243| Data security requirements can be met | Medium | Security audit and certification plan |
244 
245### Consumer Mobile
246 
247| Assumption | Typical Risk Level | Testing Approach |
248|-----------|-------------------|------------------|
249| Users will download yet another app | Very High | App store listing test or landing page |
250| Daily active usage will occur | Very High | Day-1, Day-7, Day-30 retention cohorts |
251| Notifications will not be disabled | High | Notification opt-in rate tracking |
252| Users will create content/data | High | First-session completion rate |
253| Monetization will not kill engagement | High | A/B test monetization features |
254| Organic sharing will occur | Medium | Share button usage, invite rate |
255 
256## From Assumptions to Experiments
257 
258### The Bridge
259 
260Each high-priority assumption must be converted into a testable experiment using this process:
261 
2621. **State the assumption clearly.** "We assume that ____."
2632. **Identify the riskiest element.** What part of this assumption, if wrong, would be most damaging?
2643. **Formulate a falsifiable hypothesis.** "If we ____, then ____ will happen within ____."
2654. **Choose the fastest test method.** What is the minimum effort that generates a meaningful signal?
2665. **Set pass/fail criteria in advance.** "Success = ____. Failure = ____."
2676. **Run the experiment.**
2687. **Record the result and decide.** Persevere, pivot, or dig deeper.
269 
270### Example Bridge
271 
272**Assumption:** Remote teams need asynchronous video messaging.
273 
274**Riskiest element:** Do remote teams actually feel pain around asynchronous communication, or are Slack and email sufficient?
275 
276**Hypothesis:** If we post a landing page describing async video messaging in 5 remote-work communities, at least 3% of visitors will sign up for the waitlist within 2 weeks.
277 
278**Test method:** Landing page with Mailchimp signup. $200 in targeted ads as supplement to organic posts.
279 
280**Pass/fail:** Above 3% signup rate with 500+ visitors = proceed. Below 3% = interview signups to understand why, then reassess.
281 
282**Result:** 4.2% signup rate. 21 signups. 8 responded to follow-up email. 5 described specific pain points with existing tools.
283 
284**Decision:** Assumption partially validated. Proceed to concierge MVP with the 8 respondents to validate solution fit.
285 
286### Sequencing Experiments
287 
288Test assumptions in this order:
289 
2901. **Customer and problem assumptions first.** If the problem does not exist or the customer does not care, nothing else matters.
2912. **Solution assumptions second.** Does your approach actually solve the problem?
2923. **Business model assumptions third.** Can you make money?
2934. **Growth assumptions last.** Can you scale?
294 
295This sequence prevents the most expensive mistake: building and scaling a solution to a problem nobody has.
296 

Discussion