New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Runs a pre-handoff QA checklist on a Figma design before

Figma Design QA Skill

by mohitagw15856 · MIT license · ★ 1,395 on GitHub · updated Sep 23

Figma Design QA Skill cover

Runs a pre-handoff QA checklist on a Figma design before it goes to engineering. Use when asked to QA a Figma design, do a pre-handoff check, or validate a Figma file is ready to build.

---
name: figma-design-qa
description: "Runs a pre-handoff QA checklist on a Figma design before it goes to engineering. Use when asked to QA a Figma design, do a pre-handoff check, or validate a Figma file is ready to build. Produces a structured QA report covering file hygiene, component usage, accessibility, and handoff readiness with explicit pass/fail status per item. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models."
---

# Figma Design QA Skill

Runs a systematic pre-handoff QA check on a Figma design — catching issues that cause engineering back-and-forth before they become expensive.

## Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:
- **Feature or screen being QA-d** (describe what has been designed)
- **Platform** (iOS / Android / Web)
- **Design system** (custom / Material / HIG / None)
- **Handoff tool** (Figma Inspect / Zeplin / Storybook / Direct link)
- **QA depth** (quick 15 min / standard 30 min / thorough 60 min)

Overview

Runs a systematic pre-handoff QA check on a Figma design — catching issues that cause engineering back-and-forth before they become expensive.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill figma-design-qa -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/figma-design-qa
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/82d966a7a3a2542ea8bc/figma-design-qa.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\figma-design-qa.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\figma-design-qa.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/f6ca7931 file
SKILL.md
Show the full text121 lines

Figma Design QA Skill

Runs a systematic pre-handoff QA check on a Figma design — catching issues that cause engineering back-and-forth before they become expensive.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Feature or screen being QA-d (describe what has been designed)
  • Platform (iOS / Android / Web)
  • Design system (custom / Material / HIG / None)
  • Handoff tool (Figma Inspect / Zeplin / Storybook / Direct link)
  • QA depth (quick 15 min / standard 30 min / thorough 60 min)

Programmatic Helper

Contrast ratios cannot be eyeballed. The AA line sits at 4.5:1, and #777777 on white is 4.478 (fails) while #767676 is 4.54 (passes) — no amount of looking at a screenshot separates those. Compute them:

npx --yes notugly fix "#8ab4f8" "#ffffff"     # ratio, APCA, and the nearest passing colour
npx --yes notugly onepager <url> --out review.html   # every pairing, printable
npx --yes notugly vision                      # which colours merge for colour-blind viewers

notugly fix returns the ratio, the APCA lightness contrast, and the closest colour to the one already chosen that passes — same hue, same chroma. Paste those numbers into the tables below rather than estimating them.

Deterministic, zero dependencies, and no model call — so it costs nothing to run and gives the same answer every time.

QA is a pass/fail activity, so every contrast row needs a number and a verdict. For a deployed build, npx notugly check <url> exits non-zero on a failure, which makes it usable directly in CI rather than only by hand.

Output Structure

QA Report: [Feature] | [Date] | [Platform] Overall status: Ready / Minor fixes needed / Not ready

Section 1: File Hygiene
  • All layers named semantically (no "Rectangle 12")
  • No unused/hidden layers in final frames
  • Components from library (not detached copies)
  • All text uses text styles (not manual font settings)
  • All colours use styles or variables (not hex overrides)
  • Frames named to match screen map
  • No leftover prototype wires to wrong frames
Section 2: Component Usage
  • All buttons use library component
  • All inputs use library component
  • All icons from approved icon library
  • No custom components that should be in library
  • Variants used correctly (right size, state, type)
Section 3: Content and Copy
  • No placeholder text (Lorem ipsum) in final designs
  • All copy reviewed and approved
  • Realistic content used (not "User Name")
  • Long text edge cases tested
  • Error messages are human-readable
  • Empty states have copy and CTA
Section 4: States and Coverage
  • Default, Loading, Empty, Error, Success states
  • Interactive elements have hover/active (web)
  • Disabled states designed where applicable
Section 5: Accessibility
  • All text meets WCAG AA contrast (4.5:1 body, 3:1 large)
  • UI components meet 3:1 contrast against background
  • Touch targets minimum 44x44pt iOS / 48x48dp Android
  • Focus states for keyboard/switch navigation (web)
  • Information not conveyed by colour alone
  • Icons have text labels or accessible names annotated
Section 6: Handoff Readiness
  • Dev annotations on non-obvious interactions
  • Spacing uses Auto Layout (not absolute positioning)
  • Images/assets exported at correct resolutions
  • Design matches approved requirements
  • Link to prototype included
Issues Found

For each fail: [Issue] — Blocking / Fix before handoff / Fix in next iteration

  • What: [Specific layer/screen/element]
  • Fix: [Exact action needed]
  • Owner: [Designer/PM/Both]
Handoff Decision

Status, signed off by, date.

Quality Checks

  • All 6 sections completed
  • Every fail has a specific description and fix action
  • Blocking issues separated from minor ones
  • Handoff decision is explicit

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not produce a partial QA — every checklist category must be evaluated, not just the ones that are obviously problematic
  • Do not leave the handoff decision ambiguous — the output must explicitly state pass, pass with conditions, or fail
  • Do not skip accessibility checks — colour contrast, tap target size, and screen reader labels are required, not optional
  • Do not report issues without specifying which screen or component they appear on
  • Do not approve a design if any component is detached from the library without a documented reason

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "QA this Figma design before handoff"
  • "Run a pre-handoff check on [feature] design"
  • "Is this Figma design ready for engineering?"
  • "Do a design QA on [screen/feature]"
  • "What needs fixing before we hand this off?"
1---
2name: figma-design-qa
3description: "Runs a pre-handoff QA checklist on a Figma design before it goes to engineering. Use when asked to QA a Figma design, do a pre-handoff check, or validate a Figma file is ready to build. Produces a structured QA report covering file hygiene, component usage, accessibility, and handoff readiness with explicit pass/fail status per item. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models."
4---
5 
6# Figma Design QA Skill
7 
8Runs a systematic pre-handoff QA check on a Figma design — catching issues that cause engineering back-and-forth before they become expensive.
9 
10## Required Inputs
11 
12Ask the user for these if not provided:
13- **Feature or screen being QA-d** (describe what has been designed)
14- **Platform** (iOS / Android / Web)
15- **Design system** (custom / Material / HIG / None)
16- **Handoff tool** (Figma Inspect / Zeplin / Storybook / Direct link)
17- **QA depth** (quick 15 min / standard 30 min / thorough 60 min)
18 
19 
20## Programmatic Helper
21 
22Contrast ratios cannot be eyeballed. The AA line sits at 4.5:1, and `#777777`
23on white is 4.478 (fails) while `#767676` is 4.54 (passes) — no amount of
24looking at a screenshot separates those. Compute them:
25 
26```bash
27npx --yes notugly fix "#8ab4f8" "#ffffff" # ratio, APCA, and the nearest passing colour
28npx --yes notugly onepager <url> --out review.html # every pairing, printable
29npx --yes notugly vision # which colours merge for colour-blind viewers
30```
31 
32`notugly fix` returns the ratio, the APCA lightness contrast, and the closest
33colour to the one already chosen that passes — same hue, same chroma. Paste
34those numbers into the tables below rather than estimating them.
35 
36Deterministic, zero dependencies, and **no model call** — so it costs nothing to
37run and gives the same answer every time.
38 
39QA is a pass/fail activity, so every contrast row needs a number and a verdict.
40For a deployed build, `npx notugly check <url>` **exits non-zero** on a failure,
41which makes it usable directly in CI rather than only by hand.
42 
43## Output Structure
44 
45QA Report: [Feature] | [Date] | [Platform]
46**Overall status:** Ready / Minor fixes needed / Not ready
47 
48### Section 1: File Hygiene
49- All layers named semantically (no "Rectangle 12")
50- No unused/hidden layers in final frames
51- Components from library (not detached copies)
52- All text uses text styles (not manual font settings)
53- All colours use styles or variables (not hex overrides)
54- Frames named to match screen map
55- No leftover prototype wires to wrong frames
56 
57### Section 2: Component Usage
58- All buttons use library component
59- All inputs use library component
60- All icons from approved icon library
61- No custom components that should be in library
62- Variants used correctly (right size, state, type)
63 
64### Section 3: Content and Copy
65- No placeholder text (Lorem ipsum) in final designs
66- All copy reviewed and approved
67- Realistic content used (not "User Name")
68- Long text edge cases tested
69- Error messages are human-readable
70- Empty states have copy and CTA
71 
72### Section 4: States and Coverage
73- Default, Loading, Empty, Error, Success states
74- Interactive elements have hover/active (web)
75- Disabled states designed where applicable
76 
77### Section 5: Accessibility
78- All text meets WCAG AA contrast (4.5:1 body, 3:1 large)
79- UI components meet 3:1 contrast against background
80- Touch targets minimum 44x44pt iOS / 48x48dp Android
81- Focus states for keyboard/switch navigation (web)
82- Information not conveyed by colour alone
83- Icons have text labels or accessible names annotated
84 
85### Section 6: Handoff Readiness
86- Dev annotations on non-obvious interactions
87- Spacing uses Auto Layout (not absolute positioning)
88- Images/assets exported at correct resolutions
89- Design matches approved requirements
90- Link to prototype included
91 
92### Issues Found
93For each fail:
94**[Issue] — Blocking / Fix before handoff / Fix in next iteration**
95- What: [Specific layer/screen/element]
96- Fix: [Exact action needed]
97- Owner: [Designer/PM/Both]
98 
99### Handoff Decision
100Status, signed off by, date.
101 
102## Quality Checks
103- [ ] All 6 sections completed
104- [ ] Every fail has a specific description and fix action
105- [ ] Blocking issues separated from minor ones
106- [ ] Handoff decision is explicit
107 
108## Anti-Patterns
109 
110- [ ] Do not produce a partial QA — every checklist category must be evaluated, not just the ones that are obviously problematic
111- [ ] Do not leave the handoff decision ambiguous — the output must explicitly state pass, pass with conditions, or fail
112- [ ] Do not skip accessibility checks — colour contrast, tap target size, and screen reader labels are required, not optional
113- [ ] Do not report issues without specifying which screen or component they appear on
114- [ ] Do not approve a design if any component is detached from the library without a documented reason
115 
116## Example Trigger Phrases
117- "QA this Figma design before handoff"
118- "Run a pre-handoff check on [feature] design"
119- "Is this Figma design ready for engineering?"
120- "Do a design QA on [screen/feature]"
121- "What needs fixing before we hand this off?"
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 23, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 1,395
Checked
Source
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
Creator
mohitagw15856 · 193 listings
View creator

Made with figma-design-qa

Figma Design QA Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Figma Design QA Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Figma Design QA Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Figma Design QA Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Similar skills

See all →
SkillDesign, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarifyImpeccablepbakaus/impeccable · by pbakausUse when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.★ 70.4k GitHub starsSkillApple's approach to interface design and fluidApple designemilkowalski/skills · by emilkowalskiApple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.★ 40.8k GitHub starsSkillBuild an animation from scratchBuilding Animationsemilkowalski/skills · by emilkowalskiBuild an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.★ 40.8k GitHub starsSkillRenders a component you choose in every stateBreakjakubkrehel/skills · by jakubkrehelRenders a component you choose in every state and scenario on a temporary page and stress tests it.★ 7.1k GitHub starsSkillReviews your work across multiple categories like UIChange reviewjakubkrehel/skills · by jakubkrehelReviews your work across multiple categories like UI, typography, layout, color, writing and accessibility and gives you a detailed analysis of the findings.★ 7.1k GitHub starsSkillCraft-first interface design for dashboards, admin panelsThe ProblemDammyjay93/interface-design · by Dammyjay93Craft-first interface design for dashboards, admin panels, SaaS apps, tools, settings pages, data interfaces, and interactive products. Use when designing, building, reviewing, auditing, or refining product UI where visual craft, layout hierarchy, tokens, states, visual direction, or design-system consistency matter. Not for marketing pages, landing pages, campaigns, or brand-only work.★ 5.8k GitHub stars

More from mohitagw15856

SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product featuresA/B Test Planner Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklistAccessibility Audit Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillBuild a structured account plan for any key customerAccount Plan Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization so AIAEO Optimizer Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillConduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML featureAI Ethics Review Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.★ 1.4k GitHub stars