Files of Experience mapping
wondelai/
Show the full text254 lines
Experience Mapping
A guide to creating current-state experience maps that reveal customer pain points, emotions, and unmet needs -- turning interview data into actionable opportunities for the Opportunity Solution Tree.
What Is an Experience Map?
An experience map is a visual representation of how a customer accomplishes a specific goal today, capturing each step they take, what they think and feel at each step, and where they struggle. Unlike a journey map (which tracks interactions with your product), an experience map captures the customer's full experience regardless of which tools, products, or workarounds they use.
Experience Map vs. Journey Map
| Aspect | Experience Map | Journey Map |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | The customer's entire experience of accomplishing a goal | Interactions with your specific product |
| Perspective | Customer-centered | Product-centered |
| When to use | Understanding the problem space; finding opportunities | Optimizing an existing product experience |
| Includes | Competitor usage, manual workarounds, offline steps | Your product's touchpoints only |
| Discovery value | High -- reveals unmet needs and new opportunities | Medium -- reveals friction in existing flows |
Rule of thumb: In continuous discovery, start with experience maps. They reveal the full landscape of opportunities. Use journey maps later to optimize specific product flows.
Anatomy of an Experience Map
The Five Rows
A well-structured experience map has five horizontal rows that run across each step of the experience:
┌──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┐
│ Step 1 │ Step 2 │ Step 3 │ Step 4 │ Step 5 │
├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ DOING │ DOING │ DOING │ DOING │ DOING │
│ (actions)│ (actions)│ (actions)│ (actions)│ (actions)│
├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ THINKING │ THINKING │ THINKING │ THINKING │ THINKING │
│(questions│(questions│(questions│(questions│(questions│
│ & goals) │ & goals) │ & goals) │ & goals) │ & goals) │
├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ FEELING │ FEELING │ FEELING │ FEELING │ FEELING │
│(emotions)│(emotions)│(emotions)│(emotions)│(emotions)│
├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ PAIN │ PAIN │ PAIN │ PAIN │ PAIN │
│ POINTS │ POINTS │ POINTS │ POINTS │ POINTS │
├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ OPPS │ OPPS │ OPPS │ OPPS │ OPPS │
│(needs) │(needs) │(needs) │(needs) │(needs) │
└──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┘
Row 1 -- Doing (Actions): What the customer physically does at this step. Be specific: "Opens three browser tabs to compare prices" not "Researches options."
Row 2 -- Thinking (Questions & Goals): What the customer is trying to figure out or decide. "Am I getting a good deal?" "Is this the right size?" "What do other people recommend?"
Row 3 -- Feeling (Emotions): The emotional state at this step. Use specific emotion words: frustrated, anxious, confident, overwhelmed, relieved, excited, bored.
Row 4 -- Pain Points: Where the experience breaks down. Long waits, confusing interfaces, missing information, forced workarounds, dead ends.
Row 5 -- Opportunities: Customer needs that emerge from the pain points and emotions. These feed directly into the OST.
How to Build an Experience Map
Step 1: Choose the Experience to Map
Select a specific goal that your target customers are trying to accomplish. The scope should be:
- Broad enough to capture the full experience (not just the part involving your product)
- Narrow enough to be mappable in a single session (not "manage their entire business")
| Too Broad | Too Narrow | Just Right |
|---|---|---|
| "Manage finances" | "Click the save button" | "Prepare and file quarterly taxes" |
| "Do marketing" | "Write an email subject line" | "Plan and execute a product launch campaign" |
| "Stay healthy" | "Log a meal" | "Decide what to eat for a healthy weeknight dinner" |
Step 2: Gather the Data
Experience maps must be built from real customer data, not team assumptions. Sources include:
| Source | What It Provides | How to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Interview snapshots | Specific stories about how customers accomplish the goal | Extract steps, emotions, and pain points from stories |
| Support tickets | Common failure points and confusion | Map where in the experience breakdowns occur |
| Analytics / session recordings | What users actually do in your product | Validate or challenge interview findings |
| Contextual inquiry | Direct observation of users in their environment | Capture steps that users don't think to mention |
Minimum data: At least 5 interview snapshots describing the same general experience before attempting to map it. Fewer than 5 and the map will reflect individual stories, not patterns.
Step 3: Map the Steps
Lay out the major steps of the experience from beginning to end. Start rough and refine.
Process:
- Review interview snapshots and list every distinct step mentioned
- Arrange steps in chronological order
- Merge similar steps described by different participants
- Add steps that participants implied but didn't explicitly state
- Validate the sequence: does this flow make sense?
Example -- "Hiring a contractor for home renovation":
- Realize renovation is needed
- Research what's involved and set a budget
- Ask friends and search online for contractors
- Contact 3-5 contractors for estimates
- Compare estimates and check references
- Select a contractor and negotiate terms
- Manage the project during renovation
- Inspect and approve the finished work
- Handle issues or follow-up repairs
Step 4: Fill In the Rows
For each step, use interview data to populate the Doing, Thinking, Feeling, and Pain Point rows.
Example -- Step 4: "Contact 3-5 contractors for estimates":
- Doing: Calling phone numbers, leaving voicemails, sending emails, filling out contact forms on websites
- Thinking: "How many should I contact?" "What should I ask?" "How do I compare their responses?"
- Feeling: Anxious about making the right choice, frustrated when calls go to voicemail, overwhelmed by different formats of estimates
- Pain Points: Many contractors don't call back; estimates come in different formats making comparison difficult; no standard way to evaluate quality
Step 5: Identify Opportunities
Review each pain point and emotion peak on the map and translate them into opportunity statements for the OST.
Translation examples:
| Pain Point | Opportunity Statement |
|---|---|
| Estimates come in different formats | "Homeowners need a way to compare contractor estimates on an apples-to-apples basis" |
| Many contractors don't call back | "Homeowners need a reliable way to reach responsive contractors" |
| Overwhelmed by different options | "Homeowners need guidance on what criteria matter most for their specific project" |
Collaborative Mapping Exercises
The Workshop Format (2-3 Hours)
Experience maps are most valuable when built collaboratively by the product trio. The exercise creates shared understanding that no document can replicate.
Participants: Product manager, designer, engineer(s), and optionally: data analyst, customer success representative
Materials: Large wall or digital whiteboard, sticky notes (physical or virtual), markers, printed interview snapshots
Agenda:
| Time | Activity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 0-15 min | Review the goal and scope of the experience to map | Align on boundaries |
| 15-45 min | Individual review: each person reads 3-5 snapshots and writes steps on stickies | Gather diverse perspectives |
| 45-75 min | Collaborative arrangement: place steps on the wall, discuss sequence, merge duplicates | Build shared timeline |
| 75-105 min | Fill in rows: add Doing, Thinking, Feeling, Pain Points for each step | Deepen understanding |
| 105-135 min | Identify opportunities: translate pain points into opportunity statements | Connect to the OST |
| 135-150 min | Prioritize: which opportunities are most impactful and best supported by evidence? | Focus the team |
Facilitation Tips
- Start with divergence: Let each person work independently before coming together, to avoid groupthink
- Use quotes: Place verbatim customer quotes on the map to keep it grounded
- Mark confidence levels: Use dots or colors to indicate which steps are well-supported by evidence (green) vs. assumed (red)
- Capture disagreements: When team members see the experience differently, that's valuable -- it reveals where you need more data
- Time-box ruthlessly: It's better to have a rough complete map than a detailed partial one
Remote Collaboration
For distributed teams, use digital whiteboarding tools (Miro, FigJam, Mural) with these adaptations:
- Pre-populate the template before the session
- Use breakout rooms for the individual review phase
- Assign a facilitator to manage the digital board and prevent chaos
- Record the session for team members who can't attend
Using Maps to Generate Opportunities
The Opportunity Extraction Process
After the map is built, systematically scan it for opportunities:
1. Emotion peaks: Where do feelings become strongly negative (frustrated, anxious, overwhelmed) or surprisingly positive (relieved, delighted)? Negative peaks are unmet needs; positive peaks are moments to protect or amplify.
2. Workarounds: Where are customers cobbling together multiple tools, doing manual work, or inventing their own solutions? Workarounds signal high-value unmet needs -- the customer is already motivated enough to create their own solution.
3. Drop-off points: Where do customers abandon the experience or give up? These are the highest-friction moments and represent either simplification opportunities or entirely new approaches.
4. Handoff points: Where does the customer move from one tool, person, or context to another? Handoffs create information loss, confusion, and frustration.
5. Wait times: Where does the customer have to wait -- for information, for another person, for a process to complete? Waiting creates anxiety and abandonment.
Opportunity Quality Check
For each opportunity extracted from the map, verify:
| Check | Question | If No |
|---|---|---|
| Customer-framed | Is this stated from the customer's perspective? | Rewrite: "Users need..." not "We should build..." |
| Evidence-based | Is this supported by at least 2-3 interview stories? | Flag as hypothesis; gather more evidence |
| Solution-agnostic | Does this describe a need without prescribing a solution? | Remove the implied solution; focus on the need |
| Actionable scope | Is this specific enough to generate solution ideas? | Break into sub-opportunities |
Maintaining Maps Over Time
Experience maps are living documents that should evolve as the team conducts more interviews and the product changes.
Update Triggers
| Trigger | What to Update |
|---|---|
| New interview reveals a step you missed | Add the step and associated rows |
| Multiple interviews contradict a step on the map | Revise the step or split into segments |
| Your product changes the experience | Update affected steps; look for new pain points |
| A competitor enters the space | Map how the experience changes with the competitor's solution |
| You expand to a new customer segment | Create a parallel map for the new segment; compare |
When to Create a New Map vs. Update an Existing One
- Update when the goal is the same but details have changed
- Create new when you're exploring a different goal or a significantly different customer segment
- Archive old maps rather than deleting them -- they provide historical context
Example: Complete Experience Map
Experience: "Small business owner creating and sending an invoice"
Step 1 -- Complete the work
- Doing: Finishing the project, tracking hours, gathering receipts
- Thinking: "Did I track everything? Am I forgetting any billable items?"
- Feeling: Relieved work is done, anxious about accuracy
- Pain: No single place where all billable items live; have to check email, time tracker, and notes
Step 2 -- Create the invoice
- Doing: Opening invoicing tool, entering line items, adding client details
- Thinking: "What's the right format? Do I need a PO number? What's the tax rate?"
- Feeling: Tedious, worried about looking professional
- Pain: Re-entering information that exists elsewhere; unsure about tax rules
Step 3 -- Review and send
- Doing: Proofreading, saving as PDF, attaching to email, writing a message
- Thinking: "Does this look professional? Will they pay on time?"
- Feeling: Anxious about the payment timeline, insecure about professionalism
- Pain: Manual process of export-attach-email; no tracking of whether client received it
Step 4 -- Wait for payment
- Doing: Checking bank account, checking email for confirmation
- Thinking: "Did they get it? Should I follow up? When is it rude to ask?"
- Feeling: Anxious, uncertain, sometimes resentful
- Pain: No visibility into whether invoice was viewed; unclear payment timeline
Step 5 -- Follow up on late payment
- Doing: Writing a follow-up email, calling the client, feeling awkward
- Thinking: "How do I ask without damaging the relationship?"
- Feeling: Frustrated, uncomfortable, dreading the conversation
- Pain: No standard follow-up process; feels personal rather than professional
Opportunities extracted:
- "Business owners need all billable items in one place so nothing falls through the cracks"
- "Business owners need to create professional invoices without re-entering data they've already recorded"
- "Business owners need visibility into whether a client has seen an invoice"
- "Business owners need a way to follow up on late payments that feels professional, not personal"
- "Business owners need clarity on tax rules relevant to their specific invoices"
| 1 | # Experience Mapping |
| 2 | |
| 3 | A guide to creating current-state experience maps that reveal customer pain points, emotions, and unmet needs -- turning interview data into actionable opportunities for the Opportunity Solution Tree. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## What Is an Experience Map? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | An experience map is a visual representation of how a customer accomplishes a specific goal today, capturing each step they take, what they think and feel at each step, and where they struggle. Unlike a journey map (which tracks interactions with your product), an experience map captures the customer's full experience regardless of which tools, products, or workarounds they use. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ### Experience Map vs. Journey Map |
| 10 | |
| 11 | | Aspect | Experience Map | Journey Map | |
| 12 | |--------|---------------|-------------| |
| 13 | | **Scope** | The customer's entire experience of accomplishing a goal | Interactions with your specific product | |
| 14 | | **Perspective** | Customer-centered | Product-centered | |
| 15 | | **When to use** | Understanding the problem space; finding opportunities | Optimizing an existing product experience | |
| 16 | | **Includes** | Competitor usage, manual workarounds, offline steps | Your product's touchpoints only | |
| 17 | | **Discovery value** | High -- reveals unmet needs and new opportunities | Medium -- reveals friction in existing flows | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | **Rule of thumb:** In continuous discovery, start with experience maps. They reveal the full landscape of opportunities. Use journey maps later to optimize specific product flows. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | ## Anatomy of an Experience Map |
| 22 | |
| 23 | ### The Five Rows |
| 24 | |
| 25 | A well-structured experience map has five horizontal rows that run across each step of the experience: |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ┌──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┐ |
| 29 | │ Step 1 │ Step 2 │ Step 3 │ Step 4 │ Step 5 │ |
| 30 | ├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤ |
| 31 | │ DOING │ DOING │ DOING │ DOING │ DOING │ |
| 32 | │ (actions)│ (actions)│ (actions)│ (actions)│ (actions)│ |
| 33 | ├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤ |
| 34 | │ THINKING │ THINKING │ THINKING │ THINKING │ THINKING │ |
| 35 | │(questions│(questions│(questions│(questions│(questions│ |
| 36 | │ & goals) │ & goals) │ & goals) │ & goals) │ & goals) │ |
| 37 | ├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤ |
| 38 | │ FEELING │ FEELING │ FEELING │ FEELING │ FEELING │ |
| 39 | │(emotions)│(emotions)│(emotions)│(emotions)│(emotions)│ |
| 40 | ├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤ |
| 41 | │ PAIN │ PAIN │ PAIN │ PAIN │ PAIN │ |
| 42 | │ POINTS │ POINTS │ POINTS │ POINTS │ POINTS │ |
| 43 | ├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤ |
| 44 | │ OPPS │ OPPS │ OPPS │ OPPS │ OPPS │ |
| 45 | │(needs) │(needs) │(needs) │(needs) │(needs) │ |
| 46 | └──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┘ |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 49 | **Row 1 -- Doing (Actions):** What the customer physically does at this step. Be specific: "Opens three browser tabs to compare prices" not "Researches options." |
| 50 | |
| 51 | **Row 2 -- Thinking (Questions & Goals):** What the customer is trying to figure out or decide. "Am I getting a good deal?" "Is this the right size?" "What do other people recommend?" |
| 52 | |
| 53 | **Row 3 -- Feeling (Emotions):** The emotional state at this step. Use specific emotion words: frustrated, anxious, confident, overwhelmed, relieved, excited, bored. |
| 54 | |
| 55 | **Row 4 -- Pain Points:** Where the experience breaks down. Long waits, confusing interfaces, missing information, forced workarounds, dead ends. |
| 56 | |
| 57 | **Row 5 -- Opportunities:** Customer needs that emerge from the pain points and emotions. These feed directly into the OST. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ## How to Build an Experience Map |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ### Step 1: Choose the Experience to Map |
| 62 | |
| 63 | Select a specific goal that your target customers are trying to accomplish. The scope should be: |
| 64 | **Broad enough** to capture the full experience (not just the part involving your product) |
| 65 | **Narrow enough** to be mappable in a single session (not "manage their entire business") |
| 66 | |
| 67 | | Too Broad | Too Narrow | Just Right | |
| 68 | |-----------|-----------|------------| |
| 69 | | "Manage finances" | "Click the save button" | "Prepare and file quarterly taxes" | |
| 70 | | "Do marketing" | "Write an email subject line" | "Plan and execute a product launch campaign" | |
| 71 | | "Stay healthy" | "Log a meal" | "Decide what to eat for a healthy weeknight dinner" | |
| 72 | |
| 73 | ### Step 2: Gather the Data |
| 74 | |
| 75 | Experience maps must be built from real customer data, not team assumptions. Sources include: |
| 76 | |
| 77 | | Source | What It Provides | How to Use | |
| 78 | |--------|-----------------|------------| |
| 79 | | Interview snapshots | Specific stories about how customers accomplish the goal | Extract steps, emotions, and pain points from stories | |
| 80 | | Support tickets | Common failure points and confusion | Map where in the experience breakdowns occur | |
| 81 | | Analytics / session recordings | What users actually do in your product | Validate or challenge interview findings | |
| 82 | | Contextual inquiry | Direct observation of users in their environment | Capture steps that users don't think to mention | |
| 83 | |
| 84 | **Minimum data:** At least 5 interview snapshots describing the same general experience before attempting to map it. Fewer than 5 and the map will reflect individual stories, not patterns. |
| 85 | |
| 86 | ### Step 3: Map the Steps |
| 87 | |
| 88 | Lay out the major steps of the experience from beginning to end. Start rough and refine. |
| 89 | |
| 90 | **Process:** |
| 91 | Review interview snapshots and list every distinct step mentioned |
| 92 | Arrange steps in chronological order |
| 93 | Merge similar steps described by different participants |
| 94 | Add steps that participants implied but didn't explicitly state |
| 95 | Validate the sequence: does this flow make sense? |
| 96 | |
| 97 | **Example -- "Hiring a contractor for home renovation":** |
| 98 | Realize renovation is needed |
| 99 | Research what's involved and set a budget |
| 100 | Ask friends and search online for contractors |
| 101 | Contact 3-5 contractors for estimates |
| 102 | Compare estimates and check references |
| 103 | Select a contractor and negotiate terms |
| 104 | Manage the project during renovation |
| 105 | Inspect and approve the finished work |
| 106 | Handle issues or follow-up repairs |
| 107 | |
| 108 | ### Step 4: Fill In the Rows |
| 109 | |
| 110 | For each step, use interview data to populate the Doing, Thinking, Feeling, and Pain Point rows. |
| 111 | |
| 112 | **Example -- Step 4: "Contact 3-5 contractors for estimates":** |
| 113 | **Doing:** Calling phone numbers, leaving voicemails, sending emails, filling out contact forms on websites |
| 114 | **Thinking:** "How many should I contact?" "What should I ask?" "How do I compare their responses?" |
| 115 | **Feeling:** Anxious about making the right choice, frustrated when calls go to voicemail, overwhelmed by different formats of estimates |
| 116 | **Pain Points:** Many contractors don't call back; estimates come in different formats making comparison difficult; no standard way to evaluate quality |
| 117 | |
| 118 | ### Step 5: Identify Opportunities |
| 119 | |
| 120 | Review each pain point and emotion peak on the map and translate them into opportunity statements for the OST. |
| 121 | |
| 122 | **Translation examples:** |
| 123 | |
| 124 | | Pain Point | Opportunity Statement | |
| 125 | |------------|----------------------| |
| 126 | | Estimates come in different formats | "Homeowners need a way to compare contractor estimates on an apples-to-apples basis" | |
| 127 | | Many contractors don't call back | "Homeowners need a reliable way to reach responsive contractors" | |
| 128 | | Overwhelmed by different options | "Homeowners need guidance on what criteria matter most for their specific project" | |
| 129 | |
| 130 | ## Collaborative Mapping Exercises |
| 131 | |
| 132 | ### The Workshop Format (2-3 Hours) |
| 133 | |
| 134 | Experience maps are most valuable when built collaboratively by the product trio. The exercise creates shared understanding that no document can replicate. |
| 135 | |
| 136 | **Participants:** Product manager, designer, engineer(s), and optionally: data analyst, customer success representative |
| 137 | |
| 138 | **Materials:** Large wall or digital whiteboard, sticky notes (physical or virtual), markers, printed interview snapshots |
| 139 | |
| 140 | **Agenda:** |
| 141 | |
| 142 | | Time | Activity | Purpose | |
| 143 | |------|----------|---------| |
| 144 | | 0-15 min | Review the goal and scope of the experience to map | Align on boundaries | |
| 145 | | 15-45 min | Individual review: each person reads 3-5 snapshots and writes steps on stickies | Gather diverse perspectives | |
| 146 | | 45-75 min | Collaborative arrangement: place steps on the wall, discuss sequence, merge duplicates | Build shared timeline | |
| 147 | | 75-105 min | Fill in rows: add Doing, Thinking, Feeling, Pain Points for each step | Deepen understanding | |
| 148 | | 105-135 min | Identify opportunities: translate pain points into opportunity statements | Connect to the OST | |
| 149 | | 135-150 min | Prioritize: which opportunities are most impactful and best supported by evidence? | Focus the team | |
| 150 | |
| 151 | ### Facilitation Tips |
| 152 | |
| 153 | **Start with divergence:** Let each person work independently before coming together, to avoid groupthink |
| 154 | **Use quotes:** Place verbatim customer quotes on the map to keep it grounded |
| 155 | **Mark confidence levels:** Use dots or colors to indicate which steps are well-supported by evidence (green) vs. assumed (red) |
| 156 | **Capture disagreements:** When team members see the experience differently, that's valuable -- it reveals where you need more data |
| 157 | **Time-box ruthlessly:** It's better to have a rough complete map than a detailed partial one |
| 158 | |
| 159 | ### Remote Collaboration |
| 160 | |
| 161 | For distributed teams, use digital whiteboarding tools (Miro, FigJam, Mural) with these adaptations: |
| 162 | Pre-populate the template before the session |
| 163 | Use breakout rooms for the individual review phase |
| 164 | Assign a facilitator to manage the digital board and prevent chaos |
| 165 | Record the session for team members who can't attend |
| 166 | |
| 167 | ## Using Maps to Generate Opportunities |
| 168 | |
| 169 | ### The Opportunity Extraction Process |
| 170 | |
| 171 | After the map is built, systematically scan it for opportunities: |
| 172 | |
| 173 | **1. Emotion peaks:** Where do feelings become strongly negative (frustrated, anxious, overwhelmed) or surprisingly positive (relieved, delighted)? Negative peaks are unmet needs; positive peaks are moments to protect or amplify. |
| 174 | |
| 175 | **2. Workarounds:** Where are customers cobbling together multiple tools, doing manual work, or inventing their own solutions? Workarounds signal high-value unmet needs -- the customer is already motivated enough to create their own solution. |
| 176 | |
| 177 | **3. Drop-off points:** Where do customers abandon the experience or give up? These are the highest-friction moments and represent either simplification opportunities or entirely new approaches. |
| 178 | |
| 179 | **4. Handoff points:** Where does the customer move from one tool, person, or context to another? Handoffs create information loss, confusion, and frustration. |
| 180 | |
| 181 | **5. Wait times:** Where does the customer have to wait -- for information, for another person, for a process to complete? Waiting creates anxiety and abandonment. |
| 182 | |
| 183 | ### Opportunity Quality Check |
| 184 | |
| 185 | For each opportunity extracted from the map, verify: |
| 186 | |
| 187 | | Check | Question | If No | |
| 188 | |-------|----------|-------| |
| 189 | | Customer-framed | Is this stated from the customer's perspective? | Rewrite: "Users need..." not "We should build..." | |
| 190 | | Evidence-based | Is this supported by at least 2-3 interview stories? | Flag as hypothesis; gather more evidence | |
| 191 | | Solution-agnostic | Does this describe a need without prescribing a solution? | Remove the implied solution; focus on the need | |
| 192 | | Actionable scope | Is this specific enough to generate solution ideas? | Break into sub-opportunities | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | ## Maintaining Maps Over Time |
| 195 | |
| 196 | Experience maps are living documents that should evolve as the team conducts more interviews and the product changes. |
| 197 | |
| 198 | ### Update Triggers |
| 199 | |
| 200 | | Trigger | What to Update | |
| 201 | |---------|---------------| |
| 202 | | New interview reveals a step you missed | Add the step and associated rows | |
| 203 | | Multiple interviews contradict a step on the map | Revise the step or split into segments | |
| 204 | | Your product changes the experience | Update affected steps; look for new pain points | |
| 205 | | A competitor enters the space | Map how the experience changes with the competitor's solution | |
| 206 | | You expand to a new customer segment | Create a parallel map for the new segment; compare | |
| 207 | |
| 208 | ### When to Create a New Map vs. Update an Existing One |
| 209 | |
| 210 | **Update** when the goal is the same but details have changed |
| 211 | **Create new** when you're exploring a different goal or a significantly different customer segment |
| 212 | **Archive** old maps rather than deleting them -- they provide historical context |
| 213 | |
| 214 | ## Example: Complete Experience Map |
| 215 | |
| 216 | ### Experience: "Small business owner creating and sending an invoice" |
| 217 | |
| 218 | **Step 1 -- Complete the work** |
| 219 | Doing: Finishing the project, tracking hours, gathering receipts |
| 220 | Thinking: "Did I track everything? Am I forgetting any billable items?" |
| 221 | Feeling: Relieved work is done, anxious about accuracy |
| 222 | Pain: No single place where all billable items live; have to check email, time tracker, and notes |
| 223 | |
| 224 | **Step 2 -- Create the invoice** |
| 225 | Doing: Opening invoicing tool, entering line items, adding client details |
| 226 | Thinking: "What's the right format? Do I need a PO number? What's the tax rate?" |
| 227 | Feeling: Tedious, worried about looking professional |
| 228 | Pain: Re-entering information that exists elsewhere; unsure about tax rules |
| 229 | |
| 230 | **Step 3 -- Review and send** |
| 231 | Doing: Proofreading, saving as PDF, attaching to email, writing a message |
| 232 | Thinking: "Does this look professional? Will they pay on time?" |
| 233 | Feeling: Anxious about the payment timeline, insecure about professionalism |
| 234 | Pain: Manual process of export-attach-email; no tracking of whether client received it |
| 235 | |
| 236 | **Step 4 -- Wait for payment** |
| 237 | Doing: Checking bank account, checking email for confirmation |
| 238 | Thinking: "Did they get it? Should I follow up? When is it rude to ask?" |
| 239 | Feeling: Anxious, uncertain, sometimes resentful |
| 240 | Pain: No visibility into whether invoice was viewed; unclear payment timeline |
| 241 | |
| 242 | **Step 5 -- Follow up on late payment** |
| 243 | Doing: Writing a follow-up email, calling the client, feeling awkward |
| 244 | Thinking: "How do I ask without damaging the relationship?" |
| 245 | Feeling: Frustrated, uncomfortable, dreading the conversation |
| 246 | Pain: No standard follow-up process; feels personal rather than professional |
| 247 | |
| 248 | **Opportunities extracted:** |
| 249 | "Business owners need all billable items in one place so nothing falls through the cracks" |
| 250 | "Business owners need to create professional invoices without re-entering data they've already recorded" |
| 251 | "Business owners need visibility into whether a client has seen an invoice" |
| 252 | "Business owners need a way to follow up on late payments that feels professional, not personal" |
| 253 | "Business owners need clarity on tax rules relevant to their specific invoices" |
| 254 |
Discussion
Browse more free Claude skills.