New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Write a weekly engineering status report for a team, service

Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name]

by mohitagw15856 · MIT license · ★ 1,395 on GitHub · updated Sep 23

Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name] cover

Write a weekly engineering status report for a team, service, or initiative. Use when asked to write a team update, weekly engineering report, sprint status email, or standing team communication to stakeholders.

---
name: engineering-weekly-report
description: "Write a weekly engineering status report for a team, service, or initiative. Use when asked to write a team update, weekly engineering report, sprint status email, or standing team communication to stakeholders. Produces a concise, scannable weekly report covering shipping progress, metrics, decisions, blockers, and next-week priorities."
---

# Engineering Weekly Report

Produce a weekly engineering status report that a team can send to stakeholders, their engineering manager, and the team itself. The format is fixed week-over-week so readers know exactly where to look — shipping progress at the top, decisions in the middle, risks and next steps at the bottom. The report must be readable in under 2 minutes. Avoid prose walls: use bullet points, status tags, and short tables. If metrics are not provided, leave the metrics section with [data needed] markers rather than fabricating numbers.

## Required Inputs

Ask for these if not already provided:
- **Team name and report period** — team name plus week number or date range (e.g., "Platform Team, Week 21, May 12–16")
- **Work items shipped this week** — what was completed and released or merged
- **Work items in progress** — what is actively being worked on, with rough percent-complete if known
- **Blocked items** — what is blocked, who owns the block, and what is needed to unblock
- **Key decisions made** — any architecture, process, or priority decisions made this week
- **Decisions needed next week** — any decisions that need to be made soon and who needs to make them

Overview

Produce a weekly engineering status report that a team can send to stakeholders, their engineering manager, and the team itself. The format is fixed week-over-week so readers know exactly where to look — shipping progress at the top, decisions in the middle, risks and next steps at the bottom. The report must be readable in under 2 minutes. Avoid prose walls: use bullet points, status tags, and short tables. If metrics are not provided, leave the metrics section with [data needed] markers rather than fabricating numbers.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill engineering-weekly-report -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/engineering-weekly-report
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/e2c63cfec47eeca2dce3/engineering-weekly-report.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\engineering-weekly-report.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\engineering-weekly-report.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/f6ca7931 file
SKILL.md
Show the full text173 lines

Engineering Weekly Report

Produce a weekly engineering status report that a team can send to stakeholders, their engineering manager, and the team itself. The format is fixed week-over-week so readers know exactly where to look — shipping progress at the top, decisions in the middle, risks and next steps at the bottom. The report must be readable in under 2 minutes. Avoid prose walls: use bullet points, status tags, and short tables. If metrics are not provided, leave the metrics section with [data needed] markers rather than fabricating numbers.

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not already provided:

  • Team name and report period — team name plus week number or date range (e.g., "Platform Team, Week 21, May 12–16")
  • Work items shipped this week — what was completed and released or merged
  • Work items in progress — what is actively being worked on, with rough percent-complete if known
  • Blocked items — what is blocked, who owns the block, and what is needed to unblock
  • Key decisions made — any architecture, process, or priority decisions made this week
  • Decisions needed next week — any decisions that need to be made soon and who needs to make them
  • Risks and escalations — anything that threatens next week's commitments or needs leadership visibility
  • Next week's top priorities — the 3–5 things the team plans to accomplish next week

Optional but useful:

  • Key metrics — reliability (error rate, p99 latency), velocity (story points completed), or other health indicators
  • Team health notes — PTO, new joins, attrition, morale signals worth noting
  • Sprint or iteration number — if the team runs sprints

Output Format


Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name]

Week: [Week Number] | [Date Range, e.g., May 12–16, 2025] Author: [Name or Team Lead] Distribution: [e.g., Eng leadership, Product, Team]


Shipping Progress

Shipped This Week
Item Description Impact
[Feature / Fix / Infra change] [One-line description] [Who benefits / what it unblocks]
[Feature / Fix / Infra change] [One-line description] [Who benefits / what it unblocks]
[Feature / Fix / Infra change] [One-line description] [Who benefits / what it unblocks]
In Progress
Item Owner Status Target Ship
[Work item] [Name] [~40% / On Track / At Risk] [Date or Sprint]
[Work item] [Name] [~70% / On Track / At Risk] [Date or Sprint]
[Work item] [Name] [~20% / On Track / At Risk] [Date or Sprint]
Blocked
Item Blocked Since Blocker Description Owner Needed To Unblock
[Work item] [Date] [What is blocking progress] [Name] [Specific ask — decision, resource, dependency]

If no items are blocked: No active blockers.


Key Metrics

Metrics reported as of [Date]. Prior week in parentheses.

Metric This Week Last Week Trend Target
Error rate (5xx) [X%] [X%] [↑ / ↓ / →] < [threshold]
p99 latency [Xms] [Xms] [↑ / ↓ / →] < [threshold]
Deployment frequency [X deploys] [X deploys] [↑ / ↓ / →] [target]
Story points completed [X] [X] [↑ / ↓ / →] [sprint target]
On-call page volume [X pages] [X pages] [↑ / ↓ / →] < [threshold]

Metrics notes: [Any context that makes the numbers meaningful — e.g., "Error rate spike on Tuesday tied to downstream dependency outage, resolved by EOD."]

If metrics are not provided: replace table rows with [data needed — provide metric values for this section].


Decisions

Made This Week
Decision Rationale Owner Stakeholders Informed
[Decision description] [Why — 1 sentence] [Name] [Yes / No — who]
[Decision description] [Why — 1 sentence] [Name] [Yes / No — who]

If no decisions were made: No major decisions this week.

Needed Next Week
Decision Context Deadline Decision Owner
[What needs to be decided] [Why it matters, what happens if delayed] [Date] [Name or role]

If no decisions are pending: No decisions pending.


Risks and Escalations

Risk Likelihood Impact Mitigation Escalate To
[Risk description] [High/Med/Low] [High/Med/Low] [What we're doing about it] [Name/role if escalation needed]

Escalations this week: [Any item that needs immediate leadership attention — call it out explicitly here, do not bury it in a table row. If none: "None."]


Team Health

Item Status
Team capacity this week [X of Y people at full capacity]
PTO / out of office [Names and dates, or "None"]
New joins / departures [Name, role, and date, or "None"]
On-call this week [Name]
On-call next week [Name]

Team notes: [Any morale, workload, or team dynamic signals worth surfacing — keep this factual and constructive. If nothing to note: omit this line.]


Next Week's Priorities

The [3–5] things this team will ship or meaningfully advance next week.

  1. [Priority item] — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
  2. [Priority item] — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
  3. [Priority item] — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
  4. [Priority item] — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
  5. [Priority item] — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]

Capacity risk: [If the team is at reduced capacity next week (PTO, incidents, etc.), note it here so stakeholders calibrate expectations.]


Appendix: Sprint Scorecard (if applicable)

Sprint Committed Completed Completion Rate Carried Over
Sprint [N-1] [X pts] [X pts] [X%] [X pts]
Sprint [N] (current) [X pts] [X pts — partial] [X% at midpoint] TBD

Questions or corrections: [Slack channel or email] | Next report: [Date]


Quality Checks

  • Every blocked item names a specific owner and states what is concretely needed to unblock it — not just "waiting on X"
  • Decisions-needed table includes a deadline and a named decision owner, not a vague "TBD"
  • Metrics table is either populated with real numbers or explicitly marked [data needed] — no fabricated metrics
  • Next week's priorities are written as outcomes ("ship X", "complete Y migration") not as activities ("work on X")
  • Escalations that need leadership attention are called out explicitly in the Risks section — not just buried in a table row
  • The entire report is readable in under 2 minutes — if it is longer than one printed page, trim it
  • Report period (week number and date range) is clearly stated in the header

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not fabricate metrics — if data is not available, mark the field as [data needed] rather than estimating; stakeholders making decisions on invented numbers is actively harmful
  • Do not write next week's priorities as activities ("work on X") — they must be outcomes ("ship X", "complete Y migration") so stakeholders can evaluate whether the team delivered
  • Do not bury escalations inside a risk table row — anything needing leadership attention must be called out explicitly in the Escalations section
  • Do not list blocked items without naming a specific owner and a concrete unblocking action — "waiting on X" is not a blocker entry, it is a placeholder
  • Do not write a report that exceeds two printed pages — length signals the author has not done the editorial work of deciding what matters to stakeholders
1---
2name: engineering-weekly-report
3description: "Write a weekly engineering status report for a team, service, or initiative. Use when asked to write a team update, weekly engineering report, sprint status email, or standing team communication to stakeholders. Produces a concise, scannable weekly report covering shipping progress, metrics, decisions, blockers, and next-week priorities."
4---
5 
6# Engineering Weekly Report
7 
8Produce a weekly engineering status report that a team can send to stakeholders, their engineering manager, and the team itself. The format is fixed week-over-week so readers know exactly where to look — shipping progress at the top, decisions in the middle, risks and next steps at the bottom. The report must be readable in under 2 minutes. Avoid prose walls: use bullet points, status tags, and short tables. If metrics are not provided, leave the metrics section with [data needed] markers rather than fabricating numbers.
9 
10## Required Inputs
11 
12Ask for these if not already provided:
13- **Team name and report period** — team name plus week number or date range (e.g., "Platform Team, Week 21, May 12–16")
14- **Work items shipped this week** — what was completed and released or merged
15- **Work items in progress** — what is actively being worked on, with rough percent-complete if known
16- **Blocked items** — what is blocked, who owns the block, and what is needed to unblock
17- **Key decisions made** — any architecture, process, or priority decisions made this week
18- **Decisions needed next week** — any decisions that need to be made soon and who needs to make them
19- **Risks and escalations** — anything that threatens next week's commitments or needs leadership visibility
20- **Next week's top priorities** — the 3–5 things the team plans to accomplish next week
21 
22Optional but useful:
23- **Key metrics** — reliability (error rate, p99 latency), velocity (story points completed), or other health indicators
24- **Team health notes** — PTO, new joins, attrition, morale signals worth noting
25- **Sprint or iteration number** — if the team runs sprints
26 
27## Output Format
28 
29---
30 
31# Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name]
32**Week:** [Week Number] | [Date Range, e.g., May 12–16, 2025]
33**Author:** [Name or Team Lead]
34**Distribution:** [e.g., Eng leadership, Product, Team]
35 
36---
37 
38## Shipping Progress
39 
40### Shipped This Week
41 
42| Item | Description | Impact |
43|------|-------------|--------|
44| [Feature / Fix / Infra change] | [One-line description] | [Who benefits / what it unblocks] |
45| [Feature / Fix / Infra change] | [One-line description] | [Who benefits / what it unblocks] |
46| [Feature / Fix / Infra change] | [One-line description] | [Who benefits / what it unblocks] |
47 
48### In Progress
49 
50| Item | Owner | Status | Target Ship |
51|------|-------|--------|-------------|
52| [Work item] | [Name] | [~40% / On Track / At Risk] | [Date or Sprint] |
53| [Work item] | [Name] | [~70% / On Track / At Risk] | [Date or Sprint] |
54| [Work item] | [Name] | [~20% / On Track / At Risk] | [Date or Sprint] |
55 
56### Blocked
57 
58| Item | Blocked Since | Blocker Description | Owner | Needed To Unblock |
59|------|--------------|--------------------|----|-------------------|
60| [Work item] | [Date] | [What is blocking progress] | [Name] | [Specific ask — decision, resource, dependency] |
61 
62If no items are blocked: *No active blockers.*
63 
64---
65 
66## Key Metrics
67 
68*Metrics reported as of [Date]. Prior week in parentheses.*
69 
70| Metric | This Week | Last Week | Trend | Target |
71|--------|-----------|-----------|-------|--------|
72| Error rate (5xx) | [X%] | [X%] | [↑ / ↓ / →] | < [threshold] |
73| p99 latency | [Xms] | [Xms] | [↑ / ↓ / →] | < [threshold] |
74| Deployment frequency | [X deploys] | [X deploys] | [↑ / ↓ / →] | [target] |
75| Story points completed | [X] | [X] | [↑ / ↓ / →] | [sprint target] |
76| On-call page volume | [X pages] | [X pages] | [↑ / ↓ / →] | < [threshold] |
77 
78**Metrics notes:** [Any context that makes the numbers meaningful — e.g., "Error rate spike on Tuesday tied to downstream dependency outage, resolved by EOD."]
79 
80If metrics are not provided: replace table rows with `[data needed — provide metric values for this section]`.
81 
82---
83 
84## Decisions
85 
86### Made This Week
87 
88| Decision | Rationale | Owner | Stakeholders Informed |
89|----------|-----------|-------|----------------------|
90| [Decision description] | [Why — 1 sentence] | [Name] | [Yes / No — who] |
91| [Decision description] | [Why — 1 sentence] | [Name] | [Yes / No — who] |
92 
93If no decisions were made: *No major decisions this week.*
94 
95### Needed Next Week
96 
97| Decision | Context | Deadline | Decision Owner |
98|----------|---------|----------|----------------|
99| [What needs to be decided] | [Why it matters, what happens if delayed] | [Date] | [Name or role] |
100 
101If no decisions are pending: *No decisions pending.*
102 
103---
104 
105## Risks and Escalations
106 
107| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Escalate To |
108|------|-----------|--------|-----------|-------------|
109| [Risk description] | [High/Med/Low] | [High/Med/Low] | [What we're doing about it] | [Name/role if escalation needed] |
110 
111**Escalations this week:** [Any item that needs immediate leadership attention — call it out explicitly here, do not bury it in a table row. If none: "None."]
112 
113---
114 
115## Team Health
116 
117| Item | Status |
118|------|--------|
119| Team capacity this week | [X of Y people at full capacity] |
120| PTO / out of office | [Names and dates, or "None"] |
121| New joins / departures | [Name, role, and date, or "None"] |
122| On-call this week | [Name] |
123| On-call next week | [Name] |
124 
125**Team notes:** [Any morale, workload, or team dynamic signals worth surfacing — keep this factual and constructive. If nothing to note: omit this line.]
126 
127---
128 
129## Next Week's Priorities
130 
131*The [3–5] things this team will ship or meaningfully advance next week.*
132 
1331. **[Priority item]** — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
1342. **[Priority item]** — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
1353. **[Priority item]** — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
1364. **[Priority item]** — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
1375. **[Priority item]** — [One sentence: what done looks like and who owns it]
138 
139**Capacity risk:** [If the team is at reduced capacity next week (PTO, incidents, etc.), note it here so stakeholders calibrate expectations.]
140 
141---
142 
143## Appendix: Sprint Scorecard (if applicable)
144 
145| Sprint | Committed | Completed | Completion Rate | Carried Over |
146|--------|-----------|-----------|----------------|--------------|
147| Sprint [N-1] | [X pts] | [X pts] | [X%] | [X pts] |
148| Sprint [N] (current) | [X pts] | [X pts — partial] | [X% at midpoint] | TBD |
149 
150---
151 
152*Questions or corrections: [Slack channel or email] | Next report: [Date]*
153 
154---
155 
156## Quality Checks
157 
158- [ ] Every blocked item names a specific owner and states what is concretely needed to unblock it — not just "waiting on X"
159- [ ] Decisions-needed table includes a deadline and a named decision owner, not a vague "TBD"
160- [ ] Metrics table is either populated with real numbers or explicitly marked `[data needed]` — no fabricated metrics
161- [ ] Next week's priorities are written as outcomes ("ship X", "complete Y migration") not as activities ("work on X")
162- [ ] Escalations that need leadership attention are called out explicitly in the Risks section — not just buried in a table row
163- [ ] The entire report is readable in under 2 minutes — if it is longer than one printed page, trim it
164- [ ] Report period (week number and date range) is clearly stated in the header
165 
166## Anti-Patterns
167 
168- [ ] Do not fabricate metrics — if data is not available, mark the field as `[data needed]` rather than estimating; stakeholders making decisions on invented numbers is actively harmful
169- [ ] Do not write next week's priorities as activities ("work on X") — they must be outcomes ("ship X", "complete Y migration") so stakeholders can evaluate whether the team delivered
170- [ ] Do not bury escalations inside a risk table row — anything needing leadership attention must be called out explicitly in the Escalations section
171- [ ] Do not list blocked items without naming a specific owner and a concrete unblocking action — "waiting on X" is not a blocker entry, it is a placeholder
172- [ ] Do not write a report that exceeds two printed pages — length signals the author has not done the editorial work of deciding what matters to stakeholders
173 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 23, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 1,395
Checked
Source
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
Creator
mohitagw15856 · 193 listings
View creator

Made with engineering-weekly-report

Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name] — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name] — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name] — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Engineering Weekly Report — [Team Name] — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Similar skills

See all →
SkillShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops/ar:ar-status — Experiment Dashboardalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops, and progress. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-status or asks how an autoresearch experiment is going.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillTurn a LinkedIn Analytics exportAnalytics dashboardcharlie947/social-media-skills · by charlie947Turn a LinkedIn Analytics export into an interactive dark-themed React dashboard plus a written strategic analysis with 5 data-backed content recommendations. Reads every sheet in the export, builds charts for engagement trend, follower growth, post performance scatter, day-of-week heatmap, and audience breakdown. Use this skill whenever the user says "analyse my linkedin", "linkedin analytics", "build my dashboard", "review my performance", or uploads a LinkedIn Analytics export file. Requires the user's LinkedIn Analytics export (xlsx) as input.★ 3.7k GitHub starsSkillGenerate a pre-earnings briefing for any stock using YahooEarnings Preview Skillhimself65/finance-skills · by himself65Generate a pre-earnings briefing for any stock using Yahoo Finance data. Use this skill whenever the user wants to prepare for an upcoming earnings report, understand what analysts expect, review a company's beat/miss track record, or get a quick overview before an earnings call. Triggers include: "earnings preview for AAPL", "what to expect from TSLA earnings", MSFT reports next week", "earnings preview", "pre-earnings analysis", what are analysts expecting for NVDA", "earnings estimates for", will GOOGL beat earnings", "earnings beat/miss history", upcoming earnings", "before earnings", "earnings setup", consensus estimates", "earnings whisper", "EPS expectations", what's the street expecting", "earnings season preview", any mention of preparing for or previewing an earnings report, or any request to understand expectations ahead of a company's earnings date. Always use this skill when the user mentions a ticker in context of upcoming earnings, even if they don't say "preview" explicitly.★ 3.3k GitHub starsSkillVet a perf measurement before you report or act on itBenchmark checklistmichael-denyer/pstack-claude · by michael-denyerVet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured.★ 1k GitHub starsSkillReport a bug, file an issue, submit a bug reportReport Issue — mobile-appmicrosoft/power-platform-skills · by microsoftUse when the user wants to report a bug, file an issue, submit a bug report, or report any problem with the mobile-app plugin.★ 954 GitHub starsSkillBuild the agency dashboard across all client brands: health/digital-marketing-pro:agency-dashboardindranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro · by indranilbanerjeeBuild the agency dashboard across all client brands: health, pacing, risk. "how are all our clients doing"★ 866 GitHub stars

More from mohitagw15856

SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product featuresA/B Test Planner Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklistAccessibility Audit Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillBuild a structured account plan for any key customerAccount Plan Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization so AIAEO Optimizer Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillConduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML featureAI Ethics Review Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.★ 1.4k GitHub stars