New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Write a structured escalation brief for an at-risk customer

Customer Escalation Brief Skill

by mohitagw15856 · MIT license · ★ 1,395 on GitHub · updated Sep 23

Customer Escalation Brief Skill cover

Write a structured escalation brief for an at-risk customer account. Use when an account has escalated, when a customer is threatening churn, when a P1 customer issue needs executive attention, or when preparing an internal save play.

---
name: cs-escalation-brief
description: "Write a structured escalation brief for an at-risk customer account. Use when an account has escalated, when a customer is threatening churn, when a P1 customer issue needs executive attention, or when preparing an internal save play. Produces a crisp escalation brief with account context, timeline, root cause, business impact, and a clear resolution plan."
---

# Customer Escalation Brief Skill

Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast.

A good escalation brief is not a complaint. It is a professional document that states the facts, assigns accountability honestly, and proposes a specific resolution plan.

## Required Inputs

Ask for these if not already provided:
- **Account name**, tier, and ARR
- **CSM name** and account owner
- **Nature of the escalation** — what happened, what the customer is saying
- **Timeline** of events leading to escalation

Overview

Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill cs-escalation-brief -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/cs-escalation-brief
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/fd6447d0b58124d6309e/cs-escalation-brief.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\cs-escalation-brief.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\cs-escalation-brief.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB
  • references/2 files · 14.6 KB
  • templates/1 file · 1.0 KB
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/f6ca7934 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text203 lines

Customer Escalation Brief Skill

Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast.

A good escalation brief is not a complaint. It is a professional document that states the facts, assigns accountability honestly, and proposes a specific resolution plan.

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not already provided:

  • Account name, tier, and ARR
  • CSM name and account owner
  • Nature of the escalation — what happened, what the customer is saying
  • Timeline of events leading to escalation
  • Customer contact who escalated (name, role, influence level)
  • What the customer wants — their stated ask
  • What we believe the root cause is
  • What has already been done to address the situation
  • Renewal date and current renewal risk assessment

Escalation Levels

Calibrate urgency and audience based on escalation level:

Level Trigger Audience Response time
L1 — Account Risk Customer expressing dissatisfaction; renewal at risk CSM + CS Manager 24 hours
L2 — Executive Escalation Customer escalated to their exec; requesting vendor exec involvement VP CS + Account Exec 4 hours
L3 — Churn Risk Customer has issued notice or is in active churn conversation CCO / CEO + Revenue leadership 1 hour
L4 — Public Risk Customer threatening public escalation, legal, or press CCO / Legal / Comms Immediate

Output Format


Escalation Brief: [Account Name]

Escalation level: L[1/2/3/4] — [Label] Date raised: [Date] Raised by: [CSM name] Escalation owner: [Name of exec or senior stakeholder now leading response]


Account at a Glance

Field Detail
ARR £/$/€[X]
Tier Enterprise / Mid-Market / SMB
Customer since [Date]
Renewal date [Date] — [N] days away
Renewal risk (pre-escalation) Green / Amber / Red
Renewal risk (current) Green / Amber / Red
Customer contact who escalated [Name, role, seniority]
Executive sponsor (customer) [Name, role — active / passive / vacant]
Executive sponsor (vendor) [Name, role]

What Happened — Summary

[3–5 sentences. State the facts plainly. What the customer experienced, how they reacted, and how we learned about the escalation. No editorialising. No blame.]


Timeline

List in chronological order. Each entry: [Date / time] — [What happened. Who did what.]

Include:

  • When the original issue or trigger event occurred
  • When the customer first raised concerns (informally)
  • When it escalated (formal escalation or exec involvement)
  • Actions taken since escalation

Root Cause

Primary cause: [One clear sentence. What specifically went wrong.]

Contributing factors:

  • [Factor 1 — be honest about internal failures as well as external ones]
  • [Factor 2]

Is this a systemic issue or isolated? [ ] Isolated to this account [ ] Pattern seen in other accounts — details: [_______] [ ] Product or process gap that needs fixing


Customer's Stated Position

What the customer says happened: [Their version of events — fair and unfiltered]

What they are asking for: [Their explicit ask — compensation, fix by date, exec call, SLA credit, exit clause]

Sentiment of escalating contact: [Frustrated but constructive / Angry / Seeking exit / Unknown]

Risk of public escalation: Low / Medium / High — [evidence if Medium or High]


Business Impact

Impact type Detail
ARR at risk £/$/€[X]
Potential churn probability [X]%
Reputational risk Low / Medium / High
Reference / case study status [Was a reference — now at risk / Not a reference]
Expansion pipeline at risk £/$/€[X]

What Has Been Done So Far

  1. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
  2. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
  3. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]

Has a formal apology or acknowledgement been issued? Yes / No


Proposed Resolution Plan

Immediate actions (next 24–48 hours):

Action Owner By when
[Action] [Name] [Date]
[Action] [Name] [Date]

Medium-term actions (next 2–4 weeks):

Action Owner By when
[Action] [Name] [Date]

What we are NOT offering: [Be explicit about what is not on the table — avoids misaligned expectations]

Success criteria: [How will we know the escalation is resolved? What does the customer need to confirm they are satisfied?]


Decision Required from Escalation Owner

[State clearly what decision or resource the escalation owner needs to provide. Be specific — do not make them ask. E.g.: "We need approval to offer a 20% service credit for Q2" or "We need an exec call with [name] within 48 hours."]


Communication Plan

Audience Message Channel Owner By when
Escalating customer contact [Summary of message] Email / Call [Name] [Date]
Customer exec sponsor [Summary] Call [Name] [Date]
Internal CS team [Summary] Slack / Meeting CS Manager [Date]

Deeper Materials

This skill ships with support files — use them when they are available:

  • references/deescalation-sequencing.md — De-escalation Sequencing: the Order of Operations When an Account Is on Fire. Apply it while producing the output; it carries the calibration and judgment calls the method summary above compresses.
  • templates/escalation-brief.md — a fill-in version of the deliverable with the quality gates inline. Offer it when the user wants to work the document themselves rather than have it generated.

Scoring Rubric (0–40)

Score any output of this skill before handing it over; 32+ is ship-quality.

Dimension 0 5 10
Root cause specificity & honesty Vague ("communication breakdown") or pins blame on individuals Specific cause named, but internal failures are softened or the systemic-vs-isolated question is skipped Specific primary cause, contributing factors that own internal failures plainly, and an explicit systemic-vs-isolated call
Quantified business impact No ARR figure; churn risk described in adjectives ARR stated, but churn probability, expansion pipeline, or reference risk left blank ARR at risk, churn probability, expansion pipeline, and reference/reputational exposure all quantified
Fair representation of the customer Customer's position missing, minimised, or paraphrased into harmlessness Their ask is stated, but their version of events is filtered or their sentiment unassessed Their account of events, explicit ask, sentiment, and public-escalation risk stated fairly and unfiltered
Decision-readiness of the plan No clear ask; brief ends with "what do you think?"; owners TBD Plan exists but the decision needed is implicit, or some actions lack owners and dates A specific decision is requested from the escalation owner; every action has an owner and date; what we are NOT offering and success criteria are explicit

Quality Checks

  • Root cause is specific — not "communication breakdown" or "product gap" without detail
  • Customer's position is stated fairly — not minimised or dismissed
  • A clear decision is requested from the escalation owner — brief does not end with "what do you think?"
  • ARR at risk is quantified
  • Communication plan has owners and dates — not "TBD"
  • Language is professional and blameless toward individuals

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not assign blame to individuals — focus on system failures and process gaps
  • Do not downplay ARR at risk or describe churn risk vaguely without a number
  • Do not leave resolution plan ownership as "TBD" or unassigned
  • Do not write the brief without a clear ask from the escalation owner
  • Do not omit the customer's own stated position — their perspective must be represented fairly
1---
2name: cs-escalation-brief
3description: "Write a structured escalation brief for an at-risk customer account. Use when an account has escalated, when a customer is threatening churn, when a P1 customer issue needs executive attention, or when preparing an internal save play. Produces a crisp escalation brief with account context, timeline, root cause, business impact, and a clear resolution plan."
4---
5 
6# Customer Escalation Brief Skill
7 
8Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast.
9 
10A good escalation brief is not a complaint. It is a professional document that states the facts, assigns accountability honestly, and proposes a specific resolution plan.
11 
12## Required Inputs
13 
14Ask for these if not already provided:
15- **Account name**, tier, and ARR
16- **CSM name** and account owner
17- **Nature of the escalation** — what happened, what the customer is saying
18- **Timeline** of events leading to escalation
19- **Customer contact** who escalated (name, role, influence level)
20- **What the customer wants** — their stated ask
21- **What we believe the root cause is**
22- **What has already been done** to address the situation
23- **Renewal date** and current renewal risk assessment
24 
25## Escalation Levels
26 
27Calibrate urgency and audience based on escalation level:
28 
29| Level | Trigger | Audience | Response time |
30|---|---|---|---|
31| L1 — Account Risk | Customer expressing dissatisfaction; renewal at risk | CSM + CS Manager | 24 hours |
32| L2 — Executive Escalation | Customer escalated to their exec; requesting vendor exec involvement | VP CS + Account Exec | 4 hours |
33| L3 — Churn Risk | Customer has issued notice or is in active churn conversation | CCO / CEO + Revenue leadership | 1 hour |
34| L4 — Public Risk | Customer threatening public escalation, legal, or press | CCO / Legal / Comms | Immediate |
35 
36## Output Format
37 
38---
39 
40# Escalation Brief: [Account Name]
41 
42**Escalation level:** L[1/2/3/4] — [Label]
43**Date raised:** [Date]
44**Raised by:** [CSM name]
45**Escalation owner:** [Name of exec or senior stakeholder now leading response]
46 
47---
48 
49## Account at a Glance
50 
51| Field | Detail |
52|---|---|
53| ARR | £/$/€[X] |
54| Tier | Enterprise / Mid-Market / SMB |
55| Customer since | [Date] |
56| Renewal date | [Date] — [N] days away |
57| Renewal risk (pre-escalation) | Green / Amber / Red |
58| Renewal risk (current) | Green / Amber / Red |
59| Customer contact who escalated | [Name, role, seniority] |
60| Executive sponsor (customer) | [Name, role — active / passive / vacant] |
61| Executive sponsor (vendor) | [Name, role] |
62 
63---
64 
65## What Happened — Summary
66 
67[3–5 sentences. State the facts plainly. What the customer experienced, how they reacted, and how we learned about the escalation. No editorialising. No blame.]
68 
69---
70 
71## Timeline
72 
73List in chronological order. Each entry: `[Date / time] — [What happened. Who did what.]`
74 
75Include:
76- When the original issue or trigger event occurred
77- When the customer first raised concerns (informally)
78- When it escalated (formal escalation or exec involvement)
79- Actions taken since escalation
80 
81---
82 
83## Root Cause
84 
85**Primary cause:** [One clear sentence. What specifically went wrong.]
86 
87**Contributing factors:**
88- [Factor 1 — be honest about internal failures as well as external ones]
89- [Factor 2]
90 
91**Is this a systemic issue or isolated?**
92[ ] Isolated to this account
93[ ] Pattern seen in other accounts — details: [_______]
94[ ] Product or process gap that needs fixing
95 
96---
97 
98## Customer's Stated Position
99 
100**What the customer says happened:** [Their version of events — fair and unfiltered]
101 
102**What they are asking for:** [Their explicit ask — compensation, fix by date, exec call, SLA credit, exit clause]
103 
104**Sentiment of escalating contact:** [Frustrated but constructive / Angry / Seeking exit / Unknown]
105 
106**Risk of public escalation:** Low / Medium / High — [evidence if Medium or High]
107 
108---
109 
110## Business Impact
111 
112| Impact type | Detail |
113|---|---|
114| ARR at risk | £/$/€[X] |
115| Potential churn probability | [X]% |
116| Reputational risk | Low / Medium / High |
117| Reference / case study status | [Was a reference — now at risk / Not a reference] |
118| Expansion pipeline at risk | £/$/€[X] |
119 
120---
121 
122## What Has Been Done So Far
123 
1241. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
1252. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
1263. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
127 
128**Has a formal apology or acknowledgement been issued?** Yes / No
129 
130---
131 
132## Proposed Resolution Plan
133 
134**Immediate actions (next 24–48 hours):**
135 
136| Action | Owner | By when |
137|---|---|---|
138| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
139| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
140 
141**Medium-term actions (next 2–4 weeks):**
142 
143| Action | Owner | By when |
144|---|---|---|
145| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
146 
147**What we are NOT offering:** [Be explicit about what is not on the table — avoids misaligned expectations]
148 
149**Success criteria:** [How will we know the escalation is resolved? What does the customer need to confirm they are satisfied?]
150 
151---
152 
153## Decision Required from Escalation Owner
154 
155[State clearly what decision or resource the escalation owner needs to provide. Be specific — do not make them ask. E.g.: "We need approval to offer a 20% service credit for Q2" or "We need an exec call with [name] within 48 hours."]
156 
157---
158 
159## Communication Plan
160 
161| Audience | Message | Channel | Owner | By when |
162|---|---|---|---|---|
163| Escalating customer contact | [Summary of message] | Email / Call | [Name] | [Date] |
164| Customer exec sponsor | [Summary] | Call | [Name] | [Date] |
165| Internal CS team | [Summary] | Slack / Meeting | CS Manager | [Date] |
166 
167---
168 
169## Deeper Materials
170 
171This skill ships with support files — use them when they are available:
172 
173- **`references/deescalation-sequencing.md`** — De-escalation Sequencing: the Order of Operations When an Account Is on Fire. Apply it while producing the output; it carries the calibration and judgment calls the method summary above compresses.
174- **`templates/escalation-brief.md`** — a fill-in version of the deliverable with the quality gates inline. Offer it when the user wants to work the document themselves rather than have it generated.
175 
176## Scoring Rubric (0–40)
177 
178Score any output of this skill before handing it over; 32+ is ship-quality.
179 
180| Dimension | 0 | 5 | 10 |
181|---|---|---|---|
182| **Root cause specificity & honesty** | Vague ("communication breakdown") or pins blame on individuals | Specific cause named, but internal failures are softened or the systemic-vs-isolated question is skipped | Specific primary cause, contributing factors that own internal failures plainly, and an explicit systemic-vs-isolated call |
183| **Quantified business impact** | No ARR figure; churn risk described in adjectives | ARR stated, but churn probability, expansion pipeline, or reference risk left blank | ARR at risk, churn probability, expansion pipeline, and reference/reputational exposure all quantified |
184| **Fair representation of the customer** | Customer's position missing, minimised, or paraphrased into harmlessness | Their ask is stated, but their version of events is filtered or their sentiment unassessed | Their account of events, explicit ask, sentiment, and public-escalation risk stated fairly and unfiltered |
185| **Decision-readiness of the plan** | No clear ask; brief ends with "what do you think?"; owners TBD | Plan exists but the decision needed is implicit, or some actions lack owners and dates | A specific decision is requested from the escalation owner; every action has an owner and date; what we are NOT offering and success criteria are explicit |
186 
187## Quality Checks
188 
189- [ ] Root cause is specific — not "communication breakdown" or "product gap" without detail
190- [ ] Customer's position is stated fairly — not minimised or dismissed
191- [ ] A clear decision is requested from the escalation owner — brief does not end with "what do you think?"
192- [ ] ARR at risk is quantified
193- [ ] Communication plan has owners and dates — not "TBD"
194- [ ] Language is professional and blameless toward individuals
195 
196## Anti-Patterns
197 
198- [ ] Do not assign blame to individuals — focus on system failures and process gaps
199- [ ] Do not downplay ARR at risk or describe churn risk vaguely without a number
200- [ ] Do not leave resolution plan ownership as "TBD" or unassigned
201- [ ] Do not write the brief without a clear ask from the escalation owner
202- [ ] Do not omit the customer's own stated position — their perspective must be represented fairly
203 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 23, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 1,395
Checked
Source
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
Creator
mohitagw15856 · 193 listings
View creator

Made with cs-escalation-brief

Customer Escalation Brief Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Customer Escalation Brief Skill — Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1170 skills as a glowing constellation you orbit and click into (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Customer Escalation Brief Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)
Customer Escalation Brief Skill — PM Skills Wrapped — your practice turned into a shareable, Spotify-Wrapped-style story (from the mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills README)

by mohitagw15856

Similar skills

See all →
MCPElite AI-powered customer support specialist masteringwshobson/agents · by wshobsonElite AI-powered customer support specialist mastering conversational AI, automated ticketing, sentiment analysis, and omnichannel support experiences. Integrates modern support tools, chatbot platforms, and CX optimization with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for comprehensive customer experience management.★ 39.9k GitHub starsMCPCustomer support and documentation specialistdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila7Customer support and documentation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for support ticket responses, FAQ creation, troubleshooting guides, help documentation, and customer satisfaction optimization. Specifically:\n\n<example>\nContext: A customer emails in confused about why their exported report is missing a column that used to be there.\nuser: "A customer says their CSV export is missing the 'status' column since yesterday. Can you draft a reply?"\nassistant: "I'll acknowledge the issue, check the provided context/docs for any confirmed change to the export format, and draft a clear response. If nothing confirms a format change, I'll say we're looking into it rather than guessing at a cause, offer a workaround if one exists, and flag it for escalation to engineering if it looks like a regression."\n<commentary>\nUse customer-support for direct, single-ticket responses grounded only in confirmed information, with escalation when the root cause isn't verifiable from available context.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: Support volume shows the same question about resetting two-factor authentication coming in repeatedly.\nuser: "We keep getting tickets asking how to reset 2FA. Can you create something we can point people to?"\nassistant: "I'll search the existing help center/FAQ content first to avoid duplicating or contradicting an existing article, then draft a new FAQ entry with clear numbered steps, called out prerequisites, and a note on when to escalate (e.g., if the customer is locked out entirely and needs identity verification)."\n<commentary>\nUse customer-support for FAQ/help-center content creation, checking existing docs for duplicates before writing new ones.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\nDoes not cover account health, retention, or expansion conversations — hand those off to customer-success-manager.★ 32.3k GitHub starsSkillRuns a full inbox triage using the knowledge base createdInbox-Triage — Recurring Email Triagealirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniRuns a full inbox triage using the knowledge base created by the 'inbox-setup' skill. Light-intake by design (most invocations skip questions and run with KB-default preferences); asks at most 2 grill-me override questions when invocation is outside normal cadence or includes category-skip intent. Searches recent emails, classifies them via the user's taxonomy, researches new senders, generates recommendations, drafts replies (NEVER sends), delivers a report in the user's preferred format, and updates the knowledge base with learnings. Designed to run on a recurring schedule (1-3x daily) or on demand. Use when the user wants their inbox processed, in any variation (e.g., 'triage my inbox', 'inbox triage', 'check my email', 'run email triage', 'process my inbox', 'what's new in my email', 'handle my email', 'email triage'). Requires the inbox-setup skill to have been run first.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillReads a forwarded customer email or ticketTicket deflectoranthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · by anthropicsReads a forwarded customer email or ticket, pulls order and refund status from a payments connector (PayPal, Square, or Stripe) or Shopify, account history from the CRM, and open tickets from a support desk (Zoho Desk), drafts a tone-matched reply in the owner's writing voice, and can issue a refund through the payments connector with explicit owner approval. With Shopify connected it also runs a proactive order-triage mode that surfaces orders needing attention — unfulfilled past the promised window, payment problems, pending refunds, stuck shipments — and drafts the next action for each before the customer has to ask. Use when the user says "draft a response," "answer this customer," "where's my order, I want a refund," "check my orders," or "anything about to blow up.★ 25.5k GitHub starsPromptA commercial-grade photography prompt for a macro shotE commerce main image macro pink beverage photographyYouMind-OpenLab/awesome-gpt-image-2 · by Dua FatimaA commercial-grade photography prompt for a macro shot of a chilled pink fruit drink, emphasizing condensation, bubbles, and realistic lighting.New listingSkillOptimize their subscription business end-to-endSubscription Lifecycle: Trial, Churn, Win-backappeeky/aso-skills · by appeekyWhen the user wants to optimize their subscription business end-to-end — from trial start through renewal, cancellation, and win-back. Use when the user mentions "subscription lifecycle", "trial conversion", "churn", "cancellation", "win-back", "lapsed subscribers", "dunning", "billing retry", "grace period", "renewal rate", "subscriber LTV", or "resubscribe". For paywall design and pricing strategy, see monetization-strategy. For subscription analytics dashboards, see app-analytics.★ 2.2k GitHub stars

More from mohitagw15856

SkillDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured360-Degree Feedback Template Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product featuresA/B Test Planner Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklistAccessibility Audit Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillBuild a structured account plan for any key customerAccount Plan Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization so AIAEO Optimizer Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillConduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML featureAI Ethics Review Skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.★ 1.4k GitHub stars