Creative research skill

Load when a story needs factual grounding the writer doesn't have: historical detail, cultural texture, domain accuracy, or how other authors handled similar material.

by haowjy·Apache-2.0 license·★ 506 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Files of Creative research

haowjy/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text74 lines
creative-research/SKILL.md74 lines · 3.2 KB

Creative Research

Gather material the writer can use. Evaluate the evidence — source type, reliability, confidence, conflicts — but leave story-fit decisions to the writer.

What to Look For

Primary sources. Historical records, period documents, first-person accounts, letters, diaries, court proceedings, field reports. These carry detail and texture that secondary summaries flatten.

Reference works and published fiction. Other novels, short stories, and narratives in the genre or period the author is working in. How have other writers handled similar material, settings, or problems?

History, mythology, and lore. Real-world events, folklore, cultural traditions, religious texts, oral histories. Look for the specific and surprising over the general and expected.

Wikis and encyclopedias. Fandom wikis for existing universes, Wikipedia for cultural and historical grounding, specialized references (weapons, ships, architecture, medicine, botany, legal systems).

Community discussion. Writing forums, book reviews, reader reactions, genre convention debates. These surface what readers notice, what they forgive, and what breaks immersion.

Social media and interviews. Author craft discussions, writing process threads, reader reception patterns, cultural commentary relevant to the story's setting or themes.

Domain expertise. How specific fields actually work — medicine, law, military, sailing, cooking, farming, forensics, finance. The operational details that make fiction feel grounded. Look for practitioner accounts over textbook summaries.

Place and culture. Geography, dialects, food, clothing, architecture, daily rhythms, social customs, weather patterns. The sensory and social texture of a setting.

Search for current sources over training-data recall. Cultural understanding, historical scholarship, and community consensus shift. Practitioner accounts and experience reports are higher-signal than encyclopedia summaries.

Surface conflicting information. When sources disagree on historical facts, cultural practices, or domain details, present both with citations. The writer needs to know where the record is contested.

Follow the specific. "Medieval weapons" is a starting point; "how a 14th-century English longbowman carried and maintained arrows on campaign" is a finding. The writer needs concrete detail, not category overviews.

Your Report

Structure your report:

  • Usable detail — concrete findings organized by topic or question
  • Source notes — source type, reliability, and confidence for each finding
  • Conflicts — where sources disagree, with both sides cited
  • Contradictions — anything that conflicts with what the story currently assumes
  • Gaps — what you looked for and couldn't find

Include citations and enough context that the writer can evaluate relevance without re-researching. Your final message is your report.

1---
2name: creative-research
3description: |
4 Load when a story needs factual grounding the writer doesn't have: historical detail, cultural texture, domain accuracy, or how other authors handled similar material. Pass the question and story context; returns a sourced report the writer can draw from.
5---
6 
7# Creative Research
8 
9Gather material the writer can use. Evaluate the evidence — source type,
10reliability, confidence, conflicts — but leave story-fit decisions to the
11writer.
12 
13## What to Look For
14 
15**Primary sources.** Historical records, period documents, first-person
16accounts, letters, diaries, court proceedings, field reports. These carry
17detail and texture that secondary summaries flatten.
18 
19**Reference works and published fiction.** Other novels, short stories, and
20narratives in the genre or period the author is working in. How have other
21writers handled similar material, settings, or problems?
22 
23**History, mythology, and lore.** Real-world events, folklore, cultural
24traditions, religious texts, oral histories. Look for the specific and
25surprising over the general and expected.
26 
27**Wikis and encyclopedias.** Fandom wikis for existing universes, Wikipedia
28for cultural and historical grounding, specialized references (weapons,
29ships, architecture, medicine, botany, legal systems).
30 
31**Community discussion.** Writing forums, book reviews, reader reactions,
32genre convention debates. These surface what readers notice, what they
33forgive, and what breaks immersion.
34 
35**Social media and interviews.** Author craft discussions, writing process
36threads, reader reception patterns, cultural commentary relevant to the
37story's setting or themes.
38 
39**Domain expertise.** How specific fields actually work — medicine, law,
40military, sailing, cooking, farming, forensics, finance. The operational
41details that make fiction feel grounded. Look for practitioner accounts over
42textbook summaries.
43 
44**Place and culture.** Geography, dialects, food, clothing, architecture,
45daily rhythms, social customs, weather patterns. The sensory and social
46texture of a setting.
47 
48## How to Search
49 
50Search for current sources over training-data recall. Cultural understanding,
51historical scholarship, and community consensus shift. Practitioner accounts
52and experience reports are higher-signal than encyclopedia summaries.
53 
54Surface conflicting information. When sources disagree on historical facts,
55cultural practices, or domain details, present both with citations. The
56writer needs to know where the record is contested.
57 
58Follow the specific. "Medieval weapons" is a starting point; "how a
5914th-century English longbowman carried and maintained arrows on campaign" is
60a finding. The writer needs concrete detail, not category overviews.
61 
62## Your Report
63 
64Structure your report:
65 
66- **Usable detail** — concrete findings organized by topic or question
67- **Source notes** — source type, reliability, and confidence for each finding
68- **Conflicts** — where sources disagree, with both sides cited
69- **Contradictions** — anything that conflicts with what the story currently assumes
70- **Gaps** — what you looked for and couldn't find
71 
72Include citations and enough context that the writer can evaluate relevance
73without re-researching. Your final message is your report.
74 

Discussion