Competitive Intelligence Monitor Skill
Monitor competitor signals and surface strategic implications for your roadmap.
How to use it
Claude Code
- Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into
~/.claude/skills/competitive-intelligence-monitor. - Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/skills/competitive-intelligence-monitor#main ~/.claude/skills/competitive-intelligence-monitorFor one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/competitive-intelligence-monitor.
Claude (web or desktop app)
- On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
- Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
- Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
- Check the skill is switched on.
- Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
- ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
- Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
- Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
- Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.
Source of Competitive Intelligence Monitor Skill
Show the full text73 lines
| name | description |
|---|---|
| competitive-intelligence-monitor | Monitor competitor signals and surface strategic implications for your roadmap. Use when asked to monitor competitors, track the competitive landscape, produce a competitive briefing, or understand what has changed in the market this week or month. Produces a structured intelligence brief with high/medium/low priority signals, roadmap implications, and a strategic landscape summary. For a single competitor announcement use competitor-signal-tracker; for a one-off deep dive use competitor-teardown. |
Competitive Intelligence Monitor Skill
Turn scattered competitor updates into structured weekly intelligence — not just "what they did" but "what changed since last week and what it means for us."
Required Inputs
Ask the user for these if not provided:
- Competitors to monitor (list of company names)
- Your current roadmap or strategic priorities (to assess relevance of signals)
- Previous brief or last run summary (for diff mode — what's new vs. last time)
- Time period (this week, this month)
Signal Categories to Monitor
- Product signals: New features, removals, UX changes, beta programmes
- Pricing signals: Changes to tiers, free limits, enterprise terms
- Hiring signals: Job postings revealing strategic bets
- Partnership signals: Integrations, acquisitions, ecosystem moves
- Messaging signals: Changes in positioning, audience, value proposition
Process
First Run (Full Report)
- For each competitor provided, scan all five signal categories
- Categorise each signal found
- Assess: reactive (responding to market) or proactive (setting direction)?
- Rate threat level: High / Medium / Low / Watch
- Connect each signal to a specific item on the provided roadmap
- Recommend response: Accelerate / Deprioritise / Monitor / Investigate
- Validate — Every High signal must have a specific recommended action and owner. "Monitor" is only acceptable for Low and Watch ratings.
Subsequent Runs (Diff Only)
- Compare current signals against previous run summary
- Output ONLY what is new or changed since last run
- Flag if a previously Low signal has escalated to High
- Keep output under 300 words — brevity is the point
Output Structure
Competitive Intelligence Brief — [Date]
New Since Last Run: [n signals]
🔴 High Priority
[Competitor]: [Signal] → [Implication] → [Recommended action + owner]
🟡 Watch
[Competitor]: [Signal] → [Why it matters now]
✅ No Change
[Competitors with no new signals this week]
This Week's Strategic Summary: [2 sentences max — what is the overall competitive landscape doing?]
Anti-Patterns
- Do not mark a signal as Low priority simply because it is new and unfamiliar — unknown competitive moves often deserve investigation before dismissal
- Do not provide "monitor" as the recommended response for a High-priority signal — High signals require a specific action with a named owner
- Do not include signals from competitors that are not relevant to the stated roadmap or strategic priorities — noise reduces the brief's usefulness and trains the team to ignore it
- Do not produce a diff-mode brief that is longer than the full report — if the diff output exceeds 300 words, it is a full report, not a diff
Quality Checks
- Every High-priority signal has a specific response action and owner
- Signals are categorised (not just listed as "they did X")
- Roadmap connections are specific (not "generally relevant")
- Diff mode output is under 300 words
- Strategic summary describes the landscape trend, not just repeats individual signals
| 1 | |
| 2 | name competitive-intelligence-monitor |
| 3 | description "Monitor competitor signals and surface strategic implications for your roadmap. Use when asked to monitor competitors, track the competitive landscape, produce a competitive briefing, or understand what has changed in the market this week or month. Produces a structured intelligence brief with high/medium/low priority signals, roadmap implications, and a strategic landscape summary. For a single competitor announcement use competitor-signal-tracker; for a one-off deep dive use competitor-teardown." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Competitive Intelligence Monitor Skill |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Turn scattered competitor updates into structured weekly intelligence — not just "what they did" but "what changed since last week and what it means for us." |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## Required Inputs |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Ask the user for these if not provided: |
| 13 | **Competitors to monitor** (list of company names) |
| 14 | **Your current roadmap or strategic priorities** (to assess relevance of signals) |
| 15 | **Previous brief or last run summary** (for diff mode — what's new vs. last time) |
| 16 | **Time period** (this week, this month) |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## Signal Categories to Monitor |
| 19 | **Product signals:** New features, removals, UX changes, beta programmes |
| 20 | **Pricing signals:** Changes to tiers, free limits, enterprise terms |
| 21 | **Hiring signals:** Job postings revealing strategic bets |
| 22 | **Partnership signals:** Integrations, acquisitions, ecosystem moves |
| 23 | **Messaging signals:** Changes in positioning, audience, value proposition |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ## Process |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ### First Run (Full Report) |
| 28 | For each competitor provided, scan all five signal categories |
| 29 | Categorise each signal found |
| 30 | Assess: reactive (responding to market) or proactive (setting direction)? |
| 31 | Rate threat level: High / Medium / Low / Watch |
| 32 | Connect each signal to a specific item on the provided roadmap |
| 33 | Recommend response: Accelerate / Deprioritise / Monitor / Investigate |
| 34 | **Validate** — Every High signal must have a specific recommended action and owner. "Monitor" is only acceptable for Low and Watch ratings. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | ### Subsequent Runs (Diff Only) |
| 37 | Compare current signals against previous run summary |
| 38 | Output ONLY what is new or changed since last run |
| 39 | Flag if a previously Low signal has escalated to High |
| 40 | Keep output under 300 words — brevity is the point |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ## Output Structure |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ### Competitive Intelligence Brief — [Date] |
| 45 | **New Since Last Run:** [n signals] |
| 46 | |
| 47 | #### 🔴 High Priority |
| 48 | **[Competitor]:** [Signal] → [Implication] → [Recommended action + owner] |
| 49 | |
| 50 | #### 🟡 Watch |
| 51 | **[Competitor]:** [Signal] → [Why it matters now] |
| 52 | |
| 53 | #### ✅ No Change |
| 54 | [Competitors with no new signals this week] |
| 55 | |
| 56 | **This Week's Strategic Summary:** |
| 57 | [2 sentences max — what is the overall competitive landscape doing?] |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ## Anti-Patterns |
| 60 | |
| 61 | [ ] Do not mark a signal as Low priority simply because it is new and unfamiliar — unknown competitive moves often deserve investigation before dismissal |
| 62 | [ ] Do not provide "monitor" as the recommended response for a High-priority signal — High signals require a specific action with a named owner |
| 63 | [ ] Do not include signals from competitors that are not relevant to the stated roadmap or strategic priorities — noise reduces the brief's usefulness and trains the team to ignore it |
| 64 | [ ] Do not produce a diff-mode brief that is longer than the full report — if the diff output exceeds 300 words, it is a full report, not a diff |
| 65 | |
| 66 | ## Quality Checks |
| 67 | |
| 68 | [ ] Every High-priority signal has a specific response action and owner |
| 69 | [ ] Signals are categorised (not just listed as "they did X") |
| 70 | [ ] Roadmap connections are specific (not "generally relevant") |
| 71 | [ ] Diff mode output is under 300 words |
| 72 | [ ] Strategic summary describes the landscape trend, not just repeats individual signals |
| 73 |
Discussion
Competitor Comparison & Alternatives PagesTell us your product and a rival you keep losing deals to, and get back a ready-to-publish page that shows why customers should pick you.Ad angle minerMine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviews, Reddit complaints, support tickets, and competitor ads. Extracts actual pain language, competitor weaknesses, and outcome phrases that real buyers use. Outputs a ranked angle bank with proof quotes and recommended ad formats per angle.X audience insightsRead your X (Twitter) audience and niche from real data. Pull a handle's recent tweets (yours or a competitor's) with likes, replies, and views, see which formats and hooks are working, read the repliers on a tweet (X gates likers, so repliers are the signal), and scan a niche query for top tweets. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze my tweets", "what is working on X", "read the replies", "competitor tweets", "who is engaging". Not for writing a tweet (use x-post-writer).Facebook Audience InsightsRead a Facebook Page and its audience from real data. Pull any Page's public stats (yours or a competitor's): followers, likes, categories, intro, websites. And pull the commenters on a public Page post, since Facebook hides the reactor and liker roster and shows counts only, so commenters are the signal. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze my Page", "competitor Page stats", "who is commenting", "read the comments", "audience insights". Not for writing Page posts (use fb-post-writer).
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Product.


