/cs:ciso-review <plan
/cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions

/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. Use when launching features that handle customer data, before a SOC 2 / ISO audit, or after any incident or near-miss.
--- name: "ciso-review" description: "/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. Use when launching features that handle customer data, before a SOC 2 / ISO audit, or after any incident or near-miss." --- # /cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions **Command:** `/cs:ciso-review <plan>` The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope. ## When to Run - Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data - Before signing a new vendor with data access - Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR) - Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries - After any near-miss incident
Overview
The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review -g -a claude-codemkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tar.gz/19392f7a0826 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 claude-skills-19392f7a0826/c-level-agents/skills/ciso-reviewNew-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/ba25d81a758a22a5f21f/ciso-review.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\ciso-review.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\ciso-review.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md3.2 KB
Read the files here
alirezarezvani/
Shared references4SKILL.md reads these from elsewhere in the repo. Not in the ZIP.
- SKILL.mdc-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/7.1 KB
- compliance_tracker.pyc-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/30.3 KB
- risk_quantifier.pyc-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/27.8 KB
- cs-ciso-advisor.mdc-level-agents/agents/4.9 KB
Show the full text114 lines
/cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:ciso-review <plan>
The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope.
When to Run
- Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data
- Before signing a new vendor with data access
- Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
- Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries
- After any near-miss incident
The Six CISO Questions
1. Threat Model
What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?
- Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege.
- Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact.
2. Blast Radius
If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?
- Worst case in plain English.
- Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE.
3. Detection
What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?
- Logs alone are not detection.
- Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call.
4. Response
Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?
- If no runbook: build one before ship.
- If untested: tabletop before ship.
5. Regulatory Window
What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?
- GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary.
- Pre-write the customer comms template.
6. Vendor & Supply Chain
Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?
- Subprocessor list current?
- DPAs in place?
- Last security review per vendor?
Workflow
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py
Output Format
# CISO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Threat Model
- Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description>
- Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L
- ALE: $X / year
## Blast Radius
- Data exposed (worst case): <description>
- Users affected: N
- Estimated cost: $X
## Detection
- MTTD target: X hours
- Current MTTD: X hours
- Detection rule: <name>
## Response
- IR runbook: ✅ / ❌
- Last tabletop: <date>
## Regulatory
- Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR
- Notification window: X hours/days
## Vendors
- New vendors added: N
- DPAs signed: N / N
- Security reviews complete: N / N
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK
Routing
/cs:cto-review— architecture alignment/cs:gc-review— DPA, regulatory implications/cs:decide— log risk acceptance/cs:boardroom— for CRITICAL risks
Related
- Agent:
cs-ciso-advisor - Skill:
ciso-advisor - Compliance:
../../../ra-qm-team/
Version: 1.0.0
| 1 | |
| 2 | name "ciso-review" |
| 3 | description "/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. Use when launching features that handle customer data, before a SOC 2 / ISO audit, or after any incident or near-miss." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # /cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions |
| 7 | |
| 8 | **Command:** `/cs:ciso-review <plan>` |
| 9 | |
| 10 | The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ## When to Run |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data |
| 15 | Before signing a new vendor with data access |
| 16 | Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR) |
| 17 | Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries |
| 18 | After any near-miss incident |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ## The Six CISO Questions |
| 21 | |
| 22 | ### 1. Threat Model |
| 23 | **What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?** |
| 24 | Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege. |
| 25 | Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact. |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ### 2. Blast Radius |
| 28 | **If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?** |
| 29 | Worst case in plain English. |
| 30 | Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ### 3. Detection |
| 33 | **What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?** |
| 34 | Logs alone are not detection. |
| 35 | Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ### 4. Response |
| 38 | **Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?** |
| 39 | If no runbook: build one before ship. |
| 40 | If untested: tabletop before ship. |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ### 5. Regulatory Window |
| 43 | **What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?** |
| 44 | GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary. |
| 45 | Pre-write the customer comms template. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | ### 6. Vendor & Supply Chain |
| 48 | **Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?** |
| 49 | Subprocessor list current? |
| 50 | DPAs in place? |
| 51 | Last security review per vendor? |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ## Workflow |
| 54 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py |
| 57 | python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py |
| 58 | |
| 59 | |
| 60 | ## Output Format |
| 61 | |
| 62 | |
| 63 | # CISO Review: <plan> |
| 64 | **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD |
| 65 | |
| 66 | ## Threat Model |
| 67 | - Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description> |
| 68 | - Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L |
| 69 | - ALE: $X / year |
| 70 | |
| 71 | ## Blast Radius |
| 72 | - Data exposed (worst case): <description> |
| 73 | - Users affected: N |
| 74 | - Estimated cost: $X |
| 75 | |
| 76 | ## Detection |
| 77 | - MTTD target: X hours |
| 78 | - Current MTTD: X hours |
| 79 | - Detection rule: <name> |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ## Response |
| 82 | - IR runbook: ✅ / ❌ |
| 83 | - Last tabletop: <date> |
| 84 | |
| 85 | ## Regulatory |
| 86 | - Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR |
| 87 | - Notification window: X hours/days |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ## Vendors |
| 90 | - New vendors added: N |
| 91 | - DPAs signed: N / N |
| 92 | - Security reviews complete: N / N |
| 93 | |
| 94 | ## Verdict |
| 95 | 🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK |
| 96 | |
| 97 | |
| 98 | ## Routing |
| 99 | |
| 100 | `/cs:cto-review` — architecture alignment |
| 101 | `/cs:gc-review` — DPA, regulatory implications |
| 102 | `/cs:decide` — log risk acceptance |
| 103 | `/cs:boardroom` — for CRITICAL risks |
| 104 | |
| 105 | ## Related |
| 106 | |
| 107 | Agent: [`cs-ciso-advisor`] |
| 108 | Skill: [`ciso-advisor`] |
| 109 | Compliance: `../../../ra-qm-team/` |
| 110 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | |
| 113 | **Version:** 1.0.0 |
| 114 |
Details
- Updated
- Aug 30, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 26,349
- Checked
- Source
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills ↗
- Creator
- alirezarezvani · 363 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillRun Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus KeyAzure Compliance & Security Auditing
MCPReviews completed implementation for governing-sourceCode reviewer
SkillImplement GDPR-compliant data handling with consentGdpr data handling
MCPDraft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimersLegal advisor
SkillImplement PCI DSS compliance requirements for securePci compliance
SkillData privacy and regulatory compliance specialist for GDPRData privacy complianceMore from alirezarezvani
SkillResume a paused experiment/ar:ar-resume — Resume Experiment
SkillShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops/ar:ar-status — Experiment Dashboard
SkillStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected/ar:loop — Autonomous Experiment Loop
SkillRun a single experiment iteration/ar:run — Single Experiment Iteration
SkillSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively/ar:setup — Create New Experiment
Skill/cs:boardroom <brief/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation