Ad campaign analyzer

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations.

How to use it

  1. Hit Copy the whole skill.
  2. Claude: ⋯ → Download .md, then Customize → Skills → Add → Upload skill.
    ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
    Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
  3. Describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit gooseworks-ai/goose-skills/skills/ads/composites/ad-campaign-analyzer#main ~/.claude/skills/ad-campaign-analyzer

For one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/ad-campaign-analyzer.

Not working?
  • Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
  • Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Step-by-step guide with screenshots · Ask in the forum

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Show the full text361 lines
ad-campaign-analyzer/SKILL.md361 lines13.3 KBpushed 96d agoRawView on GitHub

Ad Campaign Analyzer

Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.

Core principle: Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere).

When to Use

  • "Analyze my Google Ads performance"
  • "Which ads should I kill?"
  • "Is this campaign working?"
  • "Where am I wasting ad spend?"
  • "Optimize my Meta Ads"
  • "How should I split my ad budget?"
  • "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
  • "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
  • "Where am I getting the best return?"
  • "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Campaign data — One of:
    • CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager
    • Pasted performance table
    • Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data)
  2. Platform(s) — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All
  3. Time period — What date range does this cover?
  4. Monthly budget — Total ad spend in this period
  5. Primary goal — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads)
  6. Target metrics — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark)
  7. Any known changes? — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period?
  8. Channels currently running — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
  9. Funnel data (if available):
    • Lead → MQL rate
    • MQL → SQL rate
    • SQL → Close rate
    • Average deal size
  10. Channels you're considering but haven't tried — Want to test new channels?
  11. Constraints — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?

Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization

Accepted Data Formats

Source Key Columns Expected
Google Ads Campaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value
Meta Ads Campaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS
LinkedIn Ads Campaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads

Normalize all data into a standard analysis format:

Dimension Impressions Clicks CTR CPC Conversions Conv Rate CPA Spend Revenue/Value

Multi-Channel Normalization

When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup:

Channel Monthly Spend Impressions Clicks CTR CPC Conversions Conv Rate CPA ROAS CAC*
Google Search $[X] [N] [N] [X%] $[X] [N] [X%] $[X] [X] $[X]
Google Display ...
Meta (FB/IG) ...
LinkedIn ...
[Other] ...
Total $[X] [N] $[X] avg [X] avg $[X] avg

*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)

Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)

Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)

This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.

Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics

2A: Campaign-Level Health Check

For each campaign:

Metric Value Benchmark Status
CTR [X%] [Industry avg] [Good/Okay/Poor]
CPC $[X] [Category avg] [Good/Okay/Poor]
Conv Rate [X%] [Benchmark] [Good/Okay/Poor]
CPA $[X] [Target or benchmark] [Good/Okay/Poor]
ROAS [X] [Target or benchmark] [Good/Okay/Poor]
Impression Share [X%] [>60% ideal] [Good/Okay/Poor]

2B: Budget Waste Detection

Identify spend that produced no or negative return:

Waste Type Signal Action
Zero-conversion keywords/ads Spend > $[X] with 0 conversions Pause or add negatives
High CPA outliers CPA > 3x target Pause or restructure
Low CTR ads CTR < 50% of campaign average Replace creative
Broad match bleed Search terms report showing irrelevant clicks Add negative keywords
Audience overlap Same users hit by multiple campaigns Exclude audiences
Dayparting waste Conversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7 Set ad schedule

2C: Winner Identification

Find what's actually working:

Winner Type Signal Action
Top-performing keywords Lowest CPA, highest conv rate Increase bid, add variants
Winning ads Highest CTR + conv rate combo Scale spend, clone for other groups
Best audiences Lowest CPA segment Increase budget allocation
Best times Peak conversion hours/days Concentrate budget

2D: Statistical Significance Check

For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages):

Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B]
Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA]
Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size])
Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size])
Confidence level: [X%]
Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call]
Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance]

Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests.

Phase 3: Funnel Analysis

Click → Conversion Path

Impressions: [N] (100%)
     ↓ CTR: [X%]
Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions)
     ↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%]
Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks)
     ↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg
Revenue: $[N]

Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis

Drop-Off Point Rate Benchmark Likely Cause Fix
Impression → Click [CTR%] [Benchmark] [Ad relevance / targeting] [Copy/targeting change]
Click → Conversion [Conv%] [Benchmark] [Landing page / offer / audience mismatch] [LP optimization]
Conversion → Revenue [Close%] [Benchmark] [Lead quality / sales process] [Qualification criteria]

Phase 4: Budget Reallocation

When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization.

4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking

Rank Channel CPA Funnel-Adj CAC Share of Spend Share of Conversions Efficiency Index
1 [Channel] $[X] $[X] [X%] [X%] [Conv share ÷ Spend share]

Efficiency Index:

  • > 1.0 = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
  • = 1.0 = Proportional (fair share)
  • < 1.0 = Over-invested (getting less than its share)

4B: Marginal Return Analysis

For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:

Channel Current CPA Impression Share / Saturation Signal Marginal Return Estimate
Google Search $[X] [X%] impression share — room to grow Likely positive
Meta $[X] Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated Diminishing
LinkedIn $[X] Low volume — limited targeting pool Ceiling soon

4C: Funnel Stage Coverage

Funnel Stage Channels Covering It Current Spend Gap?
Awareness (top) [Meta Display, YouTube] $[X] [Yes/No]
Consideration (mid) [Google Search, Meta retargeting] $[X] [Yes/No]
Decision (bottom) [Google Brand, Google Search] $[X] [Yes/No]
Retargeting [Meta, Google Display] $[X] [Yes/No]

4D: Budget Shift Recommendations

Channel Current Spend Recommended Spend Change Reasoning
Google Search $[X] $[Y] +$[Z] [Lowest CPA, room to scale]
Meta $[X] $[Y] -$[Z] [Audience saturation, frequency too high]
LinkedIn $[X] $[Y] $0 [Maintain — niche but valuable]
[New channel] $0 $[Y] +$[Y] [Test budget — competitors succeeding here]
Total $[X] $[X] $0 Budget-neutral reallocation

4E: Scenario Modeling

Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)

  • Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
  • Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
  • Risk: Low

Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)

  • Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
  • Expected blended CPA: $[X]
  • Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels

Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo

  • Recommended allocation: [table]
  • Expected conversions: [N]
  • New channels to test: [list]

Phase 5: Output Format

# Ad Campaign Analysis — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Period: [Date range]
Total spend: $[X]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Primary goal: [Conversions / Revenue / Leads]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences: Overall performance verdict, biggest win, biggest problem, top recommendation including any reallocation moves]

---

## Performance Dashboard

| Campaign | Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | CPA | ROAS | Verdict |
|----------|-------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|------|---------|
| [Name] | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | $[X] | [X] | [Scale/Optimize/Pause] |

---

## Budget Waste Report

**Total estimated waste: $[X] ([X%] of total spend)**

### Wasted on zero-conversion items: $[X]
[List of keywords/ads/audiences with spend but no conversions]

### Wasted on high-CPA items: $[X]
[List of items with CPA > 3x target]

### Recommended saves: $[X]/month
[Specific items to pause]

---

## Winners to Scale

### Top Keywords/Audiences
| Item | CPA | Conv Rate | Current Spend | Recommended Spend |
|------|-----|----------|--------------|-------------------|

### Top Ads
| Ad | CTR | Conv Rate | Why It Works |
|----|-----|----------|-------------|

---

## A/B Test Results

### [Test Name]
- Variant A: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Variant B: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Confidence: [X%]
- **Verdict:** [Winner / Continue / Inconclusive]

---

## Budget Reallocation

### Current vs Recommended Allocation

| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |

**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])

### Funnel Stage Coverage
[Coverage map with gaps identified]

### New Channel Recommendations

#### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]

---

## Action Plan

### Immediate (This Week)
- [ ] **Pause:** [Specific items — keywords, ads, audiences]
- [ ] **Scale:** [Specific items — increase budget/bids]
- [ ] **Add negatives:** [Specific keywords from search terms]
- [ ] **Reallocate:** [Specific dollar shifts between channels]

### This Month
- [ ] **Test:** [New ad angles / audiences / landing pages]
- [ ] **Restructure:** [Ad groups that need splitting or merging]
- [ ] **Optimize:** [Bid strategy changes]
- [ ] **Monitor reallocation:** Track CPA shifts on scaled channels, watch for diminishing returns

### Next Month
- [ ] **Expand:** [New campaigns / channels to test]
- [ ] **Re-evaluate:** [Run this analysis again with new data, adjust allocations based on actual results]

Save to campaign-analysis-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

Component Cost
Data analysis Free (LLM reasoning)
Statistical calculations Free
Total Free

Tools Required

  • No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
  • User provides campaign data as CSV, paste, or screenshot

Trigger Phrases

  • "Analyze my ad campaign performance"
  • "Which ads should I pause?"
  • "Where am I wasting ad budget?"
  • "Is my Google Ads campaign working?"
  • "Optimize my Meta Ads spend"
  • "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
  • "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
  • "Reallocate my ad spend"
  • "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
  • "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"
1---
2name: ad-campaign-analyzer
3description: >
4 Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's
5 working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs
6 statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation
7 with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.
8tags: [ads]
9---
10 
11# Ad Campaign Analyzer
12 
13Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.
14 
15**Core principle:** Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere).
16 
17## When to Use
18 
19- "Analyze my Google Ads performance"
20- "Which ads should I kill?"
21- "Is this campaign working?"
22- "Where am I wasting ad spend?"
23- "Optimize my Meta Ads"
24- "How should I split my ad budget?"
25- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
26- "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
27- "Where am I getting the best return?"
28- "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"
29 
30## Phase 0: Intake
31 
321. **Campaign data** — One of:
33 - CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager
34 - Pasted performance table
35 - Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data)
362. **Platform(s)** — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All
373. **Time period** — What date range does this cover?
384. **Monthly budget** — Total ad spend in this period
395. **Primary goal** — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads)
406. **Target metrics** — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark)
417. **Any known changes?** — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period?
428. **Channels currently running** — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
439. **Funnel data** (if available):
44 - Lead → MQL rate
45 - MQL → SQL rate
46 - SQL → Close rate
47 - Average deal size
4810. **Channels you're considering but haven't tried** — Want to test new channels?
4911. **Constraints** — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?
50 
51## Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization
52 
53### Accepted Data Formats
54 
55| Source | Key Columns Expected |
56|--------|---------------------|
57| **Google Ads** | Campaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value |
58| **Meta Ads** | Campaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS |
59| **LinkedIn Ads** | Campaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads |
60 
61Normalize all data into a standard analysis format:
62 
63| Dimension | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | Spend | Revenue/Value |
64|-----------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|-------|--------------|
65 
66### Multi-Channel Normalization
67 
68When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup:
69 
70| Channel | Monthly Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | ROAS | CAC* |
71|---------|-------------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|------|------|
72| Google Search | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [X] | $[X] |
73| Google Display | ... | | | | | | | | | |
74| Meta (FB/IG) | ... | | | | | | | | | |
75| LinkedIn | ... | | | | | | | | | |
76| [Other] | ... | | | | | | | | | |
77| **Total** | $[X] | | | | | [N] | | $[X] avg | [X] avg | $[X] avg |
78 
79*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)
80 
81### Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)
82 
83```
84Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)
85```
86 
87This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.
88 
89## Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics
90 
91### 2A: Campaign-Level Health Check
92 
93For each campaign:
94 
95| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
96|--------|-------|-----------|--------|
97| CTR | [X%] | [Industry avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
98| CPC | $[X] | [Category avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
99| Conv Rate | [X%] | [Benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
100| CPA | $[X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
101| ROAS | [X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
102| Impression Share | [X%] | [>60% ideal] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
103 
104### 2B: Budget Waste Detection
105 
106Identify spend that produced no or negative return:
107 
108| Waste Type | Signal | Action |
109|-----------|--------|--------|
110| **Zero-conversion keywords/ads** | Spend > $[X] with 0 conversions | Pause or add negatives |
111| **High CPA outliers** | CPA > 3x target | Pause or restructure |
112| **Low CTR ads** | CTR < 50% of campaign average | Replace creative |
113| **Broad match bleed** | Search terms report showing irrelevant clicks | Add negative keywords |
114| **Audience overlap** | Same users hit by multiple campaigns | Exclude audiences |
115| **Dayparting waste** | Conversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7 | Set ad schedule |
116 
117### 2C: Winner Identification
118 
119Find what's actually working:
120 
121| Winner Type | Signal | Action |
122|------------|--------|--------|
123| **Top-performing keywords** | Lowest CPA, highest conv rate | Increase bid, add variants |
124| **Winning ads** | Highest CTR + conv rate combo | Scale spend, clone for other groups |
125| **Best audiences** | Lowest CPA segment | Increase budget allocation |
126| **Best times** | Peak conversion hours/days | Concentrate budget |
127 
128### 2D: Statistical Significance Check
129 
130For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages):
131 
132```
133Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B]
134Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA]
135Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size])
136Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size])
137Confidence level: [X%]
138Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call]
139Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance]
140```
141 
142Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests.
143 
144## Phase 3: Funnel Analysis
145 
146### Click → Conversion Path
147 
148```
149Impressions: [N] (100%)
150 ↓ CTR: [X%]
151Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions)
152 ↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%]
153Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks)
154 ↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg
155Revenue: $[N]
156```
157 
158### Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis
159 
160| Drop-Off Point | Rate | Benchmark | Likely Cause | Fix |
161|----------------|------|-----------|-------------|-----|
162| Impression → Click | [CTR%] | [Benchmark] | [Ad relevance / targeting] | [Copy/targeting change] |
163| Click → Conversion | [Conv%] | [Benchmark] | [Landing page / offer / audience mismatch] | [LP optimization] |
164| Conversion → Revenue | [Close%] | [Benchmark] | [Lead quality / sales process] | [Qualification criteria] |
165 
166## Phase 4: Budget Reallocation
167 
168When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization.
169 
170### 4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking
171 
172| Rank | Channel | CPA | Funnel-Adj CAC | Share of Spend | Share of Conversions | Efficiency Index |
173|------|---------|-----|---------------|----------------|---------------------|-----------------|
174| 1 | [Channel] | $[X] | $[X] | [X%] | [X%] | [Conv share ÷ Spend share] |
175 
176**Efficiency Index:**
177- **> 1.0** = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
178- **= 1.0** = Proportional (fair share)
179- **< 1.0** = Over-invested (getting less than its share)
180 
181### 4B: Marginal Return Analysis
182 
183For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:
184 
185| Channel | Current CPA | Impression Share / Saturation Signal | Marginal Return Estimate |
186|---------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------|
187| Google Search | $[X] | [X%] impression share — room to grow | Likely positive |
188| Meta | $[X] | Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated | Diminishing |
189| LinkedIn | $[X] | Low volume — limited targeting pool | Ceiling soon |
190 
191### 4C: Funnel Stage Coverage
192 
193| Funnel Stage | Channels Covering It | Current Spend | Gap? |
194|-------------|---------------------|--------------|------|
195| **Awareness** (top) | [Meta Display, YouTube] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
196| **Consideration** (mid) | [Google Search, Meta retargeting] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
197| **Decision** (bottom) | [Google Brand, Google Search] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
198| **Retargeting** | [Meta, Google Display] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
199 
200### 4D: Budget Shift Recommendations
201 
202| Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Reasoning |
203|---------|-------------|------------------|--------|-----------|
204| Google Search | $[X] | $[Y] | +$[Z] | [Lowest CPA, room to scale] |
205| Meta | $[X] | $[Y] | -$[Z] | [Audience saturation, frequency too high] |
206| LinkedIn | $[X] | $[Y] | $0 | [Maintain — niche but valuable] |
207| [New channel] | $0 | $[Y] | +$[Y] | [Test budget — competitors succeeding here] |
208| **Total** | $[X] | $[X] | $0 | Budget-neutral reallocation |
209 
210### 4E: Scenario Modeling
211 
212**Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)**
213- Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
214- Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
215- Risk: Low
216 
217**Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)**
218- Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
219- Expected blended CPA: $[X]
220- Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels
221 
222**Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo**
223- Recommended allocation: [table]
224- Expected conversions: [N]
225- New channels to test: [list]
226 
227## Phase 5: Output Format
228 
229```markdown
230# Ad Campaign Analysis — [Product/Client] — [DATE]
231 
232Period: [Date range]
233Total spend: $[X]
234Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
235Primary goal: [Conversions / Revenue / Leads]
236 
237---
238 
239## Executive Summary
240 
241[3-5 sentences: Overall performance verdict, biggest win, biggest problem, top recommendation including any reallocation moves]
242 
243---
244 
245## Performance Dashboard
246 
247| Campaign | Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | CPA | ROAS | Verdict |
248|----------|-------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|------|---------|
249| [Name] | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | $[X] | [X] | [Scale/Optimize/Pause] |
250 
251---
252 
253## Budget Waste Report
254 
255**Total estimated waste: $[X] ([X%] of total spend)**
256 
257### Wasted on zero-conversion items: $[X]
258[List of keywords/ads/audiences with spend but no conversions]
259 
260### Wasted on high-CPA items: $[X]
261[List of items with CPA > 3x target]
262 
263### Recommended saves: $[X]/month
264[Specific items to pause]
265 
266---
267 
268## Winners to Scale
269 
270### Top Keywords/Audiences
271| Item | CPA | Conv Rate | Current Spend | Recommended Spend |
272|------|-----|----------|--------------|-------------------|
273 
274### Top Ads
275| Ad | CTR | Conv Rate | Why It Works |
276|----|-----|----------|-------------|
277 
278---
279 
280## A/B Test Results
281 
282### [Test Name]
283- Variant A: [Metric] (n=[N])
284- Variant B: [Metric] (n=[N])
285- Confidence: [X%]
286- **Verdict:** [Winner / Continue / Inconclusive]
287 
288---
289 
290## Budget Reallocation
291 
292### Current vs Recommended Allocation
293 
294| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
295|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
296| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |
297 
298**Projected impact:**
299- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
300- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])
301 
302### Funnel Stage Coverage
303[Coverage map with gaps identified]
304 
305### New Channel Recommendations
306 
307#### [Channel Name]
308- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
309- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
310- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
311- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]
312 
313---
314 
315## Action Plan
316 
317### Immediate (This Week)
318- [ ] **Pause:** [Specific items — keywords, ads, audiences]
319- [ ] **Scale:** [Specific items — increase budget/bids]
320- [ ] **Add negatives:** [Specific keywords from search terms]
321- [ ] **Reallocate:** [Specific dollar shifts between channels]
322 
323### This Month
324- [ ] **Test:** [New ad angles / audiences / landing pages]
325- [ ] **Restructure:** [Ad groups that need splitting or merging]
326- [ ] **Optimize:** [Bid strategy changes]
327- [ ] **Monitor reallocation:** Track CPA shifts on scaled channels, watch for diminishing returns
328 
329### Next Month
330- [ ] **Expand:** [New campaigns / channels to test]
331- [ ] **Re-evaluate:** [Run this analysis again with new data, adjust allocations based on actual results]
332```
333 
334Save to `campaign-analysis-[YYYY-MM-DD].md` in the current working directory (or user-specified path).
335 
336## Cost
337 
338| Component | Cost |
339|-----------|------|
340| Data analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |
341| Statistical calculations | Free |
342| **Total** | **Free** |
343 
344## Tools Required
345 
346- No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
347- User provides campaign data as CSV, paste, or screenshot
348 
349## Trigger Phrases
350 
351- "Analyze my ad campaign performance"
352- "Which ads should I pause?"
353- "Where am I wasting ad budget?"
354- "Is my Google Ads campaign working?"
355- "Optimize my Meta Ads spend"
356- "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
357- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
358- "Reallocate my ad spend"
359- "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
360- "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"
361 

Discussion

Alternatives

Also in Cash & budget