Qms audit expert

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS.

How to use it

Claude Code
  1. Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into ~/.claude/skills/qms-audit-expert, including the files SKILL.md points to.
  2. Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit alirezarezvani/claude-skills/ra-qm-team/skills/qms-audit-expert#main ~/.claude/skills/qms-audit-expert

For one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/qms-audit-expert. This skill also uses processes.json — copying SKILL.md alone won't be enough. See the folder on GitHub.

Claude (web or desktop app)
  1. On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
  2. Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
  3. Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
  4. Check the skill is switched on.
  5. Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
  1. ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
  2. Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
  • Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
  • Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Step-by-step guide with screenshots · Ask in the forum

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Source of Qms audit expert

Show the full text324 lines
namedescriptiontriggers
qms-audit-expertISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use when planning internal audits, executing audits, classifying findings, preparing for external audits, or managing an audit program. - ISO 13485 audit - internal audit - QMS audit - audit planning - nonconformity classification - CAPA verification - audit checklist - audit finding - external audit prep - audit schedule

QMS Audit Expert

ISO 13485 internal audit methodology for medical device quality management systems.


Table of Contents


Audit Planning Workflow

Plan risk-based internal audit program:

  1. List all QMS processes requiring audit
  2. Assign risk level to each process (High/Medium/Low)
  3. Review previous audit findings and trends
  4. Determine audit frequency by risk level
  5. Assign qualified auditors (verify independence)
  6. Create annual audit schedule
  7. Communicate schedule to process owners
  8. Validation: All ISO 13485 clauses covered within cycle
Risk-Based Audit Frequency
Risk Level Frequency Criteria
High Quarterly Design control, CAPA, production validation
Medium Semi-annual Purchasing, training, document control
Low Annual Infrastructure, management review (if stable)
Audit Scope by Clause
Clause Process Focus Areas
4.2 Document Control Document approval, distribution, obsolete control
5.6 Management Review Inputs complete, decisions documented, actions tracked
6.2 Training Competency defined, records complete, effectiveness verified
7.3 Design Control Inputs, reviews, V&V, transfer, changes
7.4 Purchasing Supplier evaluation, incoming inspection
7.5 Production Work instructions, process validation, DHR
7.6 Calibration Equipment list, calibration status, out-of-tolerance
8.2.2 Internal Audit Schedule compliance, auditor independence
8.3 NC Product Identification, segregation, disposition
8.5 CAPA Root cause, implementation, effectiveness
Auditor Independence

Verify auditor independence before assignment:

  • Auditor not responsible for area being audited
  • No direct reporting relationship to auditee
  • Not involved in recent activities under audit
  • Documented qualification for audit scope

Audit Execution

Conduct systematic internal audit:

  1. Prepare audit plan (scope, criteria, schedule)
  2. Review relevant documentation before audit
  3. Conduct opening meeting with auditee
  4. Collect evidence (records, interviews, observation)
  5. Classify findings (Major/Minor/Observation)
  6. Conduct closing meeting with preliminary findings
  7. Prepare audit report within 5 business days
  8. Validation: All scope items covered, findings supported by evidence
Evidence Collection
Method Use For Documentation
Document review Procedures, records Document number, version, date
Interview Process understanding Interviewee name, role, summary
Observation Actual practice What, where, when observed
Record trace Process flow Record IDs, dates, linkage
Audit Questions by Clause

Document Control (4.2):

  • Show me the document master list
  • How do you control obsolete documents?
  • Show me evidence of document change approval

Design Control (7.3):

  • Show me the Design History File for [product]
  • Who participates in design reviews?
  • Show me design input to output traceability

CAPA (8.5):

  • Show me the CAPA log with open items
  • How do you determine root cause?
  • Show me effectiveness verification records

See references/iso13485-audit-guide.md for complete question sets.

Finding Documentation

Document each finding with:

Requirement: [Specific ISO 13485 clause or procedure]
Evidence: [What was observed, reviewed, or heard]
Gap: [How evidence fails to meet requirement]

Example:

Requirement: ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.6 requires calibration
at specified intervals.

Evidence: Calibration records for pH meter (EQ-042) show
last calibration 2024-01-15. Calibration interval is
12 months. Today is 2025-03-20.

Gap: Equipment is 2 months overdue for calibration,
representing a gap in calibration program execution.

Nonconformity Management

Classify and manage audit findings:

  1. Evaluate finding against classification criteria
  2. Assign severity (Major/Minor/Observation)
  3. Document finding with objective evidence
  4. Communicate to process owner
  5. Initiate CAPA for Major/Minor findings
  6. Track to closure
  7. Verify effectiveness at follow-up
  8. Validation: Finding closed only after effective CAPA
Classification Criteria
Category Definition CAPA Required Timeline
Major Systematic failure or absence of element Yes 30 days
Minor Isolated lapse or partial implementation Recommended 60 days
Observation Improvement opportunity Optional As appropriate
Classification Decision
Is required element absent or failed?
├── Yes → Systematic (multiple instances)? → MAJOR
│   └── No → Could affect product safety? → MAJOR
│       └── No → MINOR
└── No → Deviation from procedure?
    ├── Yes → Recurring? → MAJOR
    │   └── No → MINOR
    └── No → Improvement opportunity? → OBSERVATION
CAPA Integration
Finding Severity CAPA Depth Verification
Major Full root cause analysis (5-Why, Fishbone) Next audit or within 6 months
Minor Immediate cause identification Next scheduled audit
Observation Not required Noted at next audit

See references/nonconformity-classification.md for detailed guidance.


External Audit Preparation

Prepare for certification body or regulatory audit:

  1. Complete all scheduled internal audits
  2. Verify all findings closed with effective CAPA
  3. Review documentation for currency and accuracy
  4. Conduct management review with audit as input
  5. Prepare facility and personnel
  6. Conduct mock audit (full scope)
  7. Brief personnel on audit protocol
  8. Validation: Mock audit findings addressed before external audit
Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist

Documentation:

  • Quality Manual current
  • Procedures reflect actual practice
  • Records complete and retrievable
  • Previous audit findings closed

Personnel:

  • Key personnel available during audit
  • Subject matter experts identified
  • Personnel briefed on audit protocol
  • Escorts assigned

Facility:

  • Work areas organized
  • Documents at point of use current
  • Equipment calibration status visible
  • Nonconforming product segregated
Mock Audit Protocol
  1. Use external auditor or qualified internal auditor
  2. Cover full scope of upcoming external audit
  3. Simulate actual audit conditions (timing, formality)
  4. Document findings as for real audit
  5. Address all Major and Minor findings before external audit
  6. Brief management on readiness status

Reference Documentation

ISO 13485 Audit Guide

references/iso13485-audit-guide.md contains:

  • Clause-by-clause audit methodology
  • Sample audit questions for each clause
  • Evidence collection requirements
  • Common nonconformities by clause
  • Finding severity classification
Nonconformity Classification

references/nonconformity-classification.md contains:

  • Severity classification criteria and decision tree
  • Impact vs. occurrence matrix
  • CAPA integration requirements
  • Finding documentation templates
  • Closure requirements by severity

Tools

Audit Schedule Optimizer
# Generate optimized audit schedule
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json

# Interactive mode
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --interactive

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json --output json

Generates risk-based audit schedule considering:

  • Process risk level
  • Previous findings
  • Days since last audit
  • Criticality scores

Output includes:

  • Prioritized audit schedule
  • Quarterly distribution
  • Overdue audit alerts
  • Resource recommendations
Sample Process Input
{
  "processes": [
    {
      "name": "Design Control",
      "iso_clause": "7.3",
      "risk_level": "HIGH",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-06-15",
      "previous_findings": 2
    },
    {
      "name": "Document Control",
      "iso_clause": "4.2",
      "risk_level": "MEDIUM",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-09-01",
      "previous_findings": 0
    }
  ]
}

Audit Program Metrics

Track audit program effectiveness:

Metric Target Measurement
Schedule compliance >90% Audits completed on time
Finding closure rate >95% Findings closed by due date
Repeat findings <10% Same finding in consecutive audits
CAPA effectiveness >90% Verified effective at follow-up
Auditor utilization 4 days/month Audit days per qualified auditor
1---
2name: "qms-audit-expert"
3description: ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use when planning internal audits, executing audits, classifying findings, preparing for external audits, or managing an audit program.
4triggers:
5 - ISO 13485 audit
6 - internal audit
7 - QMS audit
8 - audit planning
9 - nonconformity classification
10 - CAPA verification
11 - audit checklist
12 - audit finding
13 - external audit prep
14 - audit schedule
15---
16 
17# QMS Audit Expert
18 
19ISO 13485 internal audit methodology for medical device quality management systems.
20 
21---
22 
23## Table of Contents
24 
25- [Audit Planning Workflow](#audit-planning-workflow)
26- [Audit Execution](#audit-execution)
27- [Nonconformity Management](#nonconformity-management)
28- [External Audit Preparation](#external-audit-preparation)
29- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
30- [Tools](#tools)
31 
32---
33 
34## Audit Planning Workflow
35 
36Plan risk-based internal audit program:
37 
381. List all QMS processes requiring audit
392. Assign risk level to each process (High/Medium/Low)
403. Review previous audit findings and trends
414. Determine audit frequency by risk level
425. Assign qualified auditors (verify independence)
436. Create annual audit schedule
447. Communicate schedule to process owners
458. **Validation:** All ISO 13485 clauses covered within cycle
46 
47### Risk-Based Audit Frequency
48 
49| Risk Level | Frequency | Criteria |
50|------------|-----------|----------|
51| High | Quarterly | Design control, CAPA, production validation |
52| Medium | Semi-annual | Purchasing, training, document control |
53| Low | Annual | Infrastructure, management review (if stable) |
54 
55### Audit Scope by Clause
56 
57| Clause | Process | Focus Areas |
58|--------|---------|-------------|
59| 4.2 | Document Control | Document approval, distribution, obsolete control |
60| 5.6 | Management Review | Inputs complete, decisions documented, actions tracked |
61| 6.2 | Training | Competency defined, records complete, effectiveness verified |
62| 7.3 | Design Control | Inputs, reviews, V&V, transfer, changes |
63| 7.4 | Purchasing | Supplier evaluation, incoming inspection |
64| 7.5 | Production | Work instructions, process validation, DHR |
65| 7.6 | Calibration | Equipment list, calibration status, out-of-tolerance |
66| 8.2.2 | Internal Audit | Schedule compliance, auditor independence |
67| 8.3 | NC Product | Identification, segregation, disposition |
68| 8.5 | CAPA | Root cause, implementation, effectiveness |
69 
70### Auditor Independence
71 
72Verify auditor independence before assignment:
73 
74- [ ] Auditor not responsible for area being audited
75- [ ] No direct reporting relationship to auditee
76- [ ] Not involved in recent activities under audit
77- [ ] Documented qualification for audit scope
78 
79---
80 
81## Audit Execution
82 
83Conduct systematic internal audit:
84 
851. Prepare audit plan (scope, criteria, schedule)
862. Review relevant documentation before audit
873. Conduct opening meeting with auditee
884. Collect evidence (records, interviews, observation)
895. Classify findings (Major/Minor/Observation)
906. Conduct closing meeting with preliminary findings
917. Prepare audit report within 5 business days
928. **Validation:** All scope items covered, findings supported by evidence
93 
94### Evidence Collection
95 
96| Method | Use For | Documentation |
97|--------|---------|---------------|
98| Document review | Procedures, records | Document number, version, date |
99| Interview | Process understanding | Interviewee name, role, summary |
100| Observation | Actual practice | What, where, when observed |
101| Record trace | Process flow | Record IDs, dates, linkage |
102 
103### Audit Questions by Clause
104 
105**Document Control (4.2):**
106- Show me the document master list
107- How do you control obsolete documents?
108- Show me evidence of document change approval
109 
110**Design Control (7.3):**
111- Show me the Design History File for [product]
112- Who participates in design reviews?
113- Show me design input to output traceability
114 
115**CAPA (8.5):**
116- Show me the CAPA log with open items
117- How do you determine root cause?
118- Show me effectiveness verification records
119 
120See `references/iso13485-audit-guide.md` for complete question sets.
121 
122### Finding Documentation
123 
124Document each finding with:
125 
126```
127Requirement: [Specific ISO 13485 clause or procedure]
128Evidence: [What was observed, reviewed, or heard]
129Gap: [How evidence fails to meet requirement]
130```
131 
132**Example:**
133```
134Requirement: ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.6 requires calibration
135at specified intervals.
136 
137Evidence: Calibration records for pH meter (EQ-042) show
138last calibration 2024-01-15. Calibration interval is
13912 months. Today is 2025-03-20.
140 
141Gap: Equipment is 2 months overdue for calibration,
142representing a gap in calibration program execution.
143```
144 
145---
146 
147## Nonconformity Management
148 
149Classify and manage audit findings:
150 
1511. Evaluate finding against classification criteria
1522. Assign severity (Major/Minor/Observation)
1533. Document finding with objective evidence
1544. Communicate to process owner
1555. Initiate CAPA for Major/Minor findings
1566. Track to closure
1577. Verify effectiveness at follow-up
1588. **Validation:** Finding closed only after effective CAPA
159 
160### Classification Criteria
161 
162| Category | Definition | CAPA Required | Timeline |
163|----------|------------|---------------|----------|
164| Major | Systematic failure or absence of element | Yes | 30 days |
165| Minor | Isolated lapse or partial implementation | Recommended | 60 days |
166| Observation | Improvement opportunity | Optional | As appropriate |
167 
168### Classification Decision
169 
170```
171Is required element absent or failed?
172├── Yes → Systematic (multiple instances)? → MAJOR
173│ └── No → Could affect product safety? → MAJOR
174│ └── No → MINOR
175└── No → Deviation from procedure?
176 ├── Yes → Recurring? → MAJOR
177 │ └── No → MINOR
178 └── No → Improvement opportunity? → OBSERVATION
179```
180 
181### CAPA Integration
182 
183| Finding Severity | CAPA Depth | Verification |
184|------------------|------------|--------------|
185| Major | Full root cause analysis (5-Why, Fishbone) | Next audit or within 6 months |
186| Minor | Immediate cause identification | Next scheduled audit |
187| Observation | Not required | Noted at next audit |
188 
189See `references/nonconformity-classification.md` for detailed guidance.
190 
191---
192 
193## External Audit Preparation
194 
195Prepare for certification body or regulatory audit:
196 
1971. Complete all scheduled internal audits
1982. Verify all findings closed with effective CAPA
1993. Review documentation for currency and accuracy
2004. Conduct management review with audit as input
2015. Prepare facility and personnel
2026. Conduct mock audit (full scope)
2037. Brief personnel on audit protocol
2048. **Validation:** Mock audit findings addressed before external audit
205 
206### Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist
207 
208**Documentation:**
209- [ ] Quality Manual current
210- [ ] Procedures reflect actual practice
211- [ ] Records complete and retrievable
212- [ ] Previous audit findings closed
213 
214**Personnel:**
215- [ ] Key personnel available during audit
216- [ ] Subject matter experts identified
217- [ ] Personnel briefed on audit protocol
218- [ ] Escorts assigned
219 
220**Facility:**
221- [ ] Work areas organized
222- [ ] Documents at point of use current
223- [ ] Equipment calibration status visible
224- [ ] Nonconforming product segregated
225 
226### Mock Audit Protocol
227 
2281. Use external auditor or qualified internal auditor
2292. Cover full scope of upcoming external audit
2303. Simulate actual audit conditions (timing, formality)
2314. Document findings as for real audit
2325. Address all Major and Minor findings before external audit
2336. Brief management on readiness status
234 
235---
236 
237## Reference Documentation
238 
239### ISO 13485 Audit Guide
240 
241`references/iso13485-audit-guide.md` contains:
242 
243- Clause-by-clause audit methodology
244- Sample audit questions for each clause
245- Evidence collection requirements
246- Common nonconformities by clause
247- Finding severity classification
248 
249### Nonconformity Classification
250 
251`references/nonconformity-classification.md` contains:
252 
253- Severity classification criteria and decision tree
254- Impact vs. occurrence matrix
255- CAPA integration requirements
256- Finding documentation templates
257- Closure requirements by severity
258 
259---
260 
261## Tools
262 
263### Audit Schedule Optimizer
264 
265```bash
266# Generate optimized audit schedule
267python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json
268 
269# Interactive mode
270python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --interactive
271 
272# JSON output for integration
273python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json --output json
274```
275 
276Generates risk-based audit schedule considering:
277- Process risk level
278- Previous findings
279- Days since last audit
280- Criticality scores
281 
282**Output includes:**
283- Prioritized audit schedule
284- Quarterly distribution
285- Overdue audit alerts
286- Resource recommendations
287 
288### Sample Process Input
289 
290```json
291{
292 "processes": [
293 {
294 "name": "Design Control",
295 "iso_clause": "7.3",
296 "risk_level": "HIGH",
297 "last_audit_date": "2024-06-15",
298 "previous_findings": 2
299 },
300 {
301 "name": "Document Control",
302 "iso_clause": "4.2",
303 "risk_level": "MEDIUM",
304 "last_audit_date": "2024-09-01",
305 "previous_findings": 0
306 }
307 ]
308}
309```
310 
311---
312 
313## Audit Program Metrics
314 
315Track audit program effectiveness:
316 
317| Metric | Target | Measurement |
318|--------|--------|-------------|
319| Schedule compliance | >90% | Audits completed on time |
320| Finding closure rate | >95% | Findings closed by due date |
321| Repeat findings | <10% | Same finding in consecutive audits |
322| CAPA effectiveness | >90% | Verified effective at follow-up |
323| Auditor utilization | 4 days/month | Audit days per qualified auditor |
324 

Discussion

Alternatives

Also in Roadmap & prioritiesSee all 277 in Product →