Pricing strategy simulator skill

Simulate CPG pricing strategies including cost pass-through, promotional pricing, EDLP/Hi-Lo analysis, and price pack architecture optimization with elasticity modeling and competitive response scenarios.

by writer·Apache-2.0 license·GitHub ↗

★ 7 Stars on the repo·Checked

npx degit writer/skills/skills/pricing-strategy-simulator#main ~/.claude/skills/pricing-strategy-simulator

SKILL.md · 11.4 KB · installs the whole folder to ~/.claude/skills/pricing-strategy-simulator

Files of Pricing strategy simulator

Files 1 file
Show the full text285 lines

Pricing Strategy Simulator

Overview

Model and simulate pricing strategies across the CPG value chain — from manufacturer list price through retailer shelf price to consumer response. This skill integrates price elasticity modeling, competitive price gap analysis, price pack architecture design, and channel pricing consistency to produce financially rigorous pricing recommendations with quantified risk ranges.

When to Use

  • Cost-increase pass-through strategy and sizing
  • Promotional pricing depth optimization
  • EDLP vs Hi-Lo strategy evaluation
  • Price pack architecture (PPA) design or rationalization
  • Competitive price gap analysis and response
  • Private label price gap management
  • Price harmonization across channels/retailers
  • Revenue Growth Management (RGM) initiatives

Required Inputs

Input Description Format
Current pricing List price, net price, shelf price by SKU/retailer Price table
Price elasticity Own-price elasticity by SKU or brand (estimated or measured) Coefficient (e.g., -1.8)
Cross-price elasticity How competitor/substitute price changes affect your volume Coefficient matrix
Cost structure COGS breakdown, margin targets by SKU $ per unit
Competitive pricing Key competitor shelf prices and promotional patterns Price table
Volume data Current unit volume by SKU, retailer, channel Units per period
Price pack architecture Size, count, price points across portfolio SKU matrix
Retailer margin requirements Known or estimated retailer margin expectations % or $ per unit

Methodology

Step 1: Current Pricing Landscape Assessment

Map the complete pricing architecture:

Manufacturer List Price (MSLP)
  − Off-Invoice Allowance (OI)
  = Net Invoice Price
  − Scan/Performance Allowances
  = Net Net Price (Net Revenue to Manufacturer)

Retailer Cost (= Net Invoice Price)
  + Retailer Margin
  = Regular Shelf Price (RSP)
  − Promotional Discount
  = Promoted Price

Key Ratios:
  Trade Rate = (MSLP − Net Net) / MSLP
  Retailer Margin = (RSP − Net Invoice) / RSP
  Consumer Value = Price per Unit (oz, count, serving)
Step 2: Elasticity-Based Volume Modeling

Model volume impact of price changes:

Own-Price Elasticity Application:

% Volume Change = Elasticity × % Price Change

Example: Elasticity = -1.8, Price increase = +5%
Volume impact = -1.8 × 5% = -9.0%

New Volume = Current Volume × (1 + Volume Change)
New Revenue = New Volume × New Price
Revenue impact = (New Revenue / Current Revenue) − 1

Elasticity Confidence Ranges: Use a range rather than a point estimate:

  • Optimistic elasticity: 70% of point estimate (less elastic)
  • Base elasticity: Point estimate
  • Pessimistic elasticity: 130% of point estimate (more elastic)

This produces a revenue impact range for risk assessment.

Cross-Price Elasticity (Competitive Response):

% Volume Change (Yours) = Cross-Elasticity × % Price Change (Competitor)

If competitor follows your increase: Net volume impact reduced
If competitor holds price: Full elasticity impact applies
If competitor reduces price: Amplified negative impact
Step 3: Price Gap Analysis

Analyze competitive and private label price gaps:

Price Gap Calculation:

Absolute Gap = Your Price − Competitor Price
Relative Gap = (Your Price − Competitor Price) / Competitor Price × 100

Price Per Unit Gap (normalize by size):
Your $/oz vs Competitor $/oz → Gap in $/oz and %

Critical Price Gap Thresholds (CPG industry benchmarks):

Gap Type Danger Zone Optimal Zone
vs. #1 Branded Competitor >15% premium 0-10% premium
vs. Private Label >40% premium 20-35% premium
vs. Value Tier <10% premium >25% premium

Flag any SKU crossing into the danger zone.

Step 4: Price Pack Architecture (PPA) Simulation

Evaluate the portfolio price ladder:

Good/Better/Best Framework:
  Good (entry):   [Size/Count] at $[X.XX] → $[X.XX]/oz → Index 100
  Better (core):  [Size/Count] at $[X.XX] → $[X.XX]/oz → Index [XX]
  Best (premium): [Size/Count] at $[X.XX] → $[X.XX]/oz → Index [XX]

Key PPA Metrics:
  - Price per unit consistency across sizes (should reward larger sizes)
  - Margin per unit by tier (Best > Better > Good)
  - Volume distribution across tiers (healthy: 20/50/30 or similar)
  - Channel appropriateness (Club = large sizes, C-Store = small/single serve)

Size Optimization: Calculate the price-per-unit curve to ensure logical step-ups:

Price/oz should decrease with size: Single Serve > Multi-Pack > Family Size
Exception: Premium/craft segments may maintain flat $/oz across sizes
Step 5: Promotional Pricing Simulation

Model promotional depth and frequency:

Baseline Volume: [units/week at regular price]
Promoted Volume at X% discount:
  = Baseline × (1 + |Promo Elasticity| × Discount %)
  Note: Promo elasticity typically 2-4x regular elasticity

Promotional Profit:
  = Promoted Volume × (Promoted Price − COGS) − Promo Funding Cost
  vs.
  Baseline Profit = Baseline Volume × (Regular Price − COGS)

Incremental Profit = Promotional Profit − Baseline Profit

EDLP vs Hi-Lo Comparison:

Dimension EDLP Hi-Lo
Avg shelf price Lower, stable Higher regular, lower promo
Volume pattern Steady Spiky (promo-driven)
Supply chain Predictable Volatile (bullwhip)
Consumer type Price-conscious, planned Deal-seekers, cherry-pickers
Trade spend Lower (less promo funding) Higher (deep promotional events)
Margin profile Consistent Variable (deep promos can be negative)
Step 6: Scenario Matrix Construction

Build a comprehensive pricing scenario matrix:

Scenario Your Action Competitor Response Volume Impact Revenue Impact Margin Impact
A: Full pass-through +X% Match Low/Med/High $XM +Xpp
B: Full pass-through +X% Hold Low/Med/High $XM +Xpp
C: Partial pass-through +Y% Match Low/Med/High $XM +Xpp
D: Partial + resize +Y% + downsize Hold Low/Med/High $XM +Xpp
E: Absorb No change N/A None $0 −Xpp

Probability-weight the scenarios and calculate expected value.

Step 7: Revenue Growth Management (RGM) Synthesis

Integrate pricing with the full RGM toolkit:

Revenue Growth Levers:
1. List Price Increase — direct margin expansion
2. Mix Management — shift volume to premium tiers
3. Pack Size Optimization — reduce $/oz while maintaining absolute price
4. Trade Spend Efficiency — same volume at lower promotional investment
5. White Space — new price points/formats without cannibalization
6. Reduce Promotions — fewer, deeper, more targeted promotions

Quantify each lever's contribution to total revenue growth target.

Output Specification

# Pricing Strategy Simulation — [Brand/Portfolio]

## Recommendation Summary
**Recommended Strategy**: [Strategy name]
**Expected Revenue Impact**: $XM (+X.X%)
**Expected Margin Impact**: +/-X.Xpp
**Volume Risk Range**: -X% to -X% (optimistic to pessimistic elasticity)

## Current Pricing Landscape
[Pricing architecture from MSLP to shelf price]
[Price gap analysis vs. key competitors and private label]

## Elasticity-Based Impact Model

| Scenario | Price Change | Volume Impact | Revenue Impact | Margin Impact |
|----------|-------------|---------------|----------------|---------------|
| [Scenario A] | +X% | −X% to −X% | +$XM to +$XM | +Xpp |
| [Scenario B] | +X% | −X% to −X% | +$XM to +$XM | +Xpp |

## Competitive Response Analysis
[Scenario matrix with competitor response assumptions]

## Price Pack Architecture Analysis
[Good/Better/Best ladder with price-per-unit curve]

## Promotional Depth Optimization
[Recommended promotional mechanics and depth with ROI by tier]

## RGM Lever Summary
| Lever | Estimated Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|-------|-----------------|-----------|----------|
| List price | $XM | High | Q[X] |
| Mix management | $XM | Medium | Ongoing |
| Pack optimization | $XM | Medium | Q[X] |

## Risks and Mitigations
[Key risks with probability, impact, and contingency plans]

Analysis Framework

Price-Volume-Profit Triangle: Every pricing decision involves trade-offs among three dimensions. Visualize the trade-off:

  • Price increase → volume risk → margin benefit (if volume decline < price gain)
  • Price decrease → volume gain → margin risk (if margin dilution > volume gain)
  • Breakeven volume change = Price Change % / (CM% + Price Change %)

Example

Input: "Cost increase of 8%. Current shelf price $4.99, COGS $2.30, margin 42.5%. Elasticity estimated at -2.0. Private label is at $3.49."

Analysis:

"An 8% cost increase raises COGS from $2.30 to $2.48, compressing margin from 42.5% to 38.5% if absorbed. Recommended: 5% shelf price increase to $5.24 with simultaneous introduction of a 'Value Size' at $7.99/24oz ($0.33/oz vs current $0.42/oz). The 5% increase at -2.0 elasticity yields an expected -10% volume decline on the core SKU, partially offset by trade-up to the Value Size. Net revenue impact: +$1.2M (+2.8%). Margin recovers to 40.8% (+230bps vs absorption scenario). The private label gap widens from 43% to 50% premium — approaching the danger zone. Monitor private label unit share weekly; if private label share gains >200bps in 8 weeks, deploy targeted competitive-response coupon ($0.75 off) at affected retailers."

Guidelines

  • Always model a range of elasticities, not a single point estimate
  • Include competitive response scenarios — pricing doesn't happen in a vacuum
  • Check price gaps vs. private label after every pricing action
  • Price pack architecture must maintain logical price-per-unit progression
  • Separate regular shelf pricing strategy from promotional pricing strategy
  • Calculate breakeven volume change for every pricing scenario
  • Consider retailer margin impact — retailers must accept the shelf price

Validation Checklist

  • Current pricing architecture mapped from list price to shelf price
  • Elasticity applied with confidence range (optimistic/base/pessimistic)
  • At least 3 pricing scenarios modeled with full financial impact
  • Competitive price gaps analyzed with danger zone flagging
  • Cross-price elasticity and competitor response scenarios included
  • Price pack architecture evaluated for logical step-ups
  • Promotional pricing depth optimized with ROI calculations
  • RGM lever contribution quantified
  • Breakeven volume change calculated for recommended strategy
  • Retailer margin impact assessed
  • Risks identified with monitoring triggers and contingency plans
1---
2name: pricing-strategy-simulator
3description: Simulate CPG pricing strategies including cost pass-through, promotional pricing, EDLP/Hi-Lo analysis, and price pack architecture optimization with elasticity modeling and competitive response scenarios. Use when evaluating price changes, building price pack architecture, analyzing price gaps, or modeling price elasticity impacts.
4 
5metadata:
6 display_name: "Pricing Strategy Simulator"
7 short_description: "Simulate CPG pricing scenarios with elasticity modeling"
8 default_prompt: "Simulate my pricing strategy options and suggest the best next steps"
9 version: "1.0.1"
10 tags:
11 - cpg-retail
12 icon_path: "assets/icon.png"
13---
14 
15# Pricing Strategy Simulator
16 
17## Overview
18 
19Model and simulate pricing strategies across the CPG value chain — from manufacturer list price through retailer shelf price to consumer response. This skill integrates price elasticity modeling, competitive price gap analysis, price pack architecture design, and channel pricing consistency to produce financially rigorous pricing recommendations with quantified risk ranges.
20 
21## When to Use
22 
23- Cost-increase pass-through strategy and sizing
24- Promotional pricing depth optimization
25- EDLP vs Hi-Lo strategy evaluation
26- Price pack architecture (PPA) design or rationalization
27- Competitive price gap analysis and response
28- Private label price gap management
29- Price harmonization across channels/retailers
30- Revenue Growth Management (RGM) initiatives
31 
32## Required Inputs
33 
34| Input | Description | Format |
35|-------|-------------|--------|
36| Current pricing | List price, net price, shelf price by SKU/retailer | Price table |
37| Price elasticity | Own-price elasticity by SKU or brand (estimated or measured) | Coefficient (e.g., -1.8) |
38| Cross-price elasticity | How competitor/substitute price changes affect your volume | Coefficient matrix |
39| Cost structure | COGS breakdown, margin targets by SKU | $ per unit |
40| Competitive pricing | Key competitor shelf prices and promotional patterns | Price table |
41| Volume data | Current unit volume by SKU, retailer, channel | Units per period |
42| Price pack architecture | Size, count, price points across portfolio | SKU matrix |
43| Retailer margin requirements | Known or estimated retailer margin expectations | % or $ per unit |
44 
45## Methodology
46 
47### Step 1: Current Pricing Landscape Assessment
48 
49Map the complete pricing architecture:
50 
51```
52Manufacturer List Price (MSLP)
53 − Off-Invoice Allowance (OI)
54 = Net Invoice Price
55 − Scan/Performance Allowances
56 = Net Net Price (Net Revenue to Manufacturer)
57 
58Retailer Cost (= Net Invoice Price)
59 + Retailer Margin
60 = Regular Shelf Price (RSP)
61 − Promotional Discount
62 = Promoted Price
63 
64Key Ratios:
65 Trade Rate = (MSLP − Net Net) / MSLP
66 Retailer Margin = (RSP − Net Invoice) / RSP
67 Consumer Value = Price per Unit (oz, count, serving)
68```
69 
70### Step 2: Elasticity-Based Volume Modeling
71 
72Model volume impact of price changes:
73 
74**Own-Price Elasticity Application:**
75```
76% Volume Change = Elasticity × % Price Change
77 
78Example: Elasticity = -1.8, Price increase = +5%
79Volume impact = -1.8 × 5% = -9.0%
80 
81New Volume = Current Volume × (1 + Volume Change)
82New Revenue = New Volume × New Price
83Revenue impact = (New Revenue / Current Revenue) − 1
84```
85 
86**Elasticity Confidence Ranges:**
87Use a range rather than a point estimate:
88- Optimistic elasticity: 70% of point estimate (less elastic)
89- Base elasticity: Point estimate
90- Pessimistic elasticity: 130% of point estimate (more elastic)
91 
92This produces a revenue impact range for risk assessment.
93 
94**Cross-Price Elasticity (Competitive Response):**
95```
96% Volume Change (Yours) = Cross-Elasticity × % Price Change (Competitor)
97 
98If competitor follows your increase: Net volume impact reduced
99If competitor holds price: Full elasticity impact applies
100If competitor reduces price: Amplified negative impact
101```
102 
103### Step 3: Price Gap Analysis
104 
105Analyze competitive and private label price gaps:
106 
107**Price Gap Calculation:**
108```
109Absolute Gap = Your Price − Competitor Price
110Relative Gap = (Your Price − Competitor Price) / Competitor Price × 100
111 
112Price Per Unit Gap (normalize by size):
113Your $/oz vs Competitor $/oz → Gap in $/oz and %
114```
115 
116**Critical Price Gap Thresholds (CPG industry benchmarks):**
117| Gap Type | Danger Zone | Optimal Zone |
118|----------|------------|-------------|
119| vs. #1 Branded Competitor | >15% premium | 0-10% premium |
120| vs. Private Label | >40% premium | 20-35% premium |
121| vs. Value Tier | <10% premium | >25% premium |
122 
123Flag any SKU crossing into the danger zone.
124 
125### Step 4: Price Pack Architecture (PPA) Simulation
126 
127Evaluate the portfolio price ladder:
128 
129```
130Good/Better/Best Framework:
131 Good (entry): [Size/Count] at $[X.XX] → $[X.XX]/oz → Index 100
132 Better (core): [Size/Count] at $[X.XX] → $[X.XX]/oz → Index [XX]
133 Best (premium): [Size/Count] at $[X.XX] → $[X.XX]/oz → Index [XX]
134 
135Key PPA Metrics:
136 - Price per unit consistency across sizes (should reward larger sizes)
137 - Margin per unit by tier (Best > Better > Good)
138 - Volume distribution across tiers (healthy: 20/50/30 or similar)
139 - Channel appropriateness (Club = large sizes, C-Store = small/single serve)
140```
141 
142**Size Optimization**: Calculate the price-per-unit curve to ensure logical step-ups:
143```
144Price/oz should decrease with size: Single Serve > Multi-Pack > Family Size
145Exception: Premium/craft segments may maintain flat $/oz across sizes
146```
147 
148### Step 5: Promotional Pricing Simulation
149 
150Model promotional depth and frequency:
151 
152```
153Baseline Volume: [units/week at regular price]
154Promoted Volume at X% discount:
155 = Baseline × (1 + |Promo Elasticity| × Discount %)
156 Note: Promo elasticity typically 2-4x regular elasticity
157 
158Promotional Profit:
159 = Promoted Volume × (Promoted Price − COGS) − Promo Funding Cost
160 vs.
161 Baseline Profit = Baseline Volume × (Regular Price − COGS)
162 
163Incremental Profit = Promotional Profit − Baseline Profit
164```
165 
166**EDLP vs Hi-Lo Comparison:**
167| Dimension | EDLP | Hi-Lo |
168|-----------|------|-------|
169| Avg shelf price | Lower, stable | Higher regular, lower promo |
170| Volume pattern | Steady | Spiky (promo-driven) |
171| Supply chain | Predictable | Volatile (bullwhip) |
172| Consumer type | Price-conscious, planned | Deal-seekers, cherry-pickers |
173| Trade spend | Lower (less promo funding) | Higher (deep promotional events) |
174| Margin profile | Consistent | Variable (deep promos can be negative) |
175 
176### Step 6: Scenario Matrix Construction
177 
178Build a comprehensive pricing scenario matrix:
179 
180| Scenario | Your Action | Competitor Response | Volume Impact | Revenue Impact | Margin Impact |
181|----------|------------|-------------------|---------------|----------------|---------------|
182| A: Full pass-through | +X% | Match | Low/Med/High | $XM | +Xpp |
183| B: Full pass-through | +X% | Hold | Low/Med/High | $XM | +Xpp |
184| C: Partial pass-through | +Y% | Match | Low/Med/High | $XM | +Xpp |
185| D: Partial + resize | +Y% + downsize | Hold | Low/Med/High | $XM | +Xpp |
186| E: Absorb | No change | N/A | None | $0 | −Xpp |
187 
188Probability-weight the scenarios and calculate expected value.
189 
190### Step 7: Revenue Growth Management (RGM) Synthesis
191 
192Integrate pricing with the full RGM toolkit:
193 
194```
195Revenue Growth Levers:
1961. List Price Increase — direct margin expansion
1972. Mix Management — shift volume to premium tiers
1983. Pack Size Optimization — reduce $/oz while maintaining absolute price
1994. Trade Spend Efficiency — same volume at lower promotional investment
2005. White Space — new price points/formats without cannibalization
2016. Reduce Promotions — fewer, deeper, more targeted promotions
202 
203Quantify each lever's contribution to total revenue growth target.
204```
205 
206## Output Specification
207 
208```markdown
209# Pricing Strategy Simulation — [Brand/Portfolio]
210 
211## Recommendation Summary
212**Recommended Strategy**: [Strategy name]
213**Expected Revenue Impact**: $XM (+X.X%)
214**Expected Margin Impact**: +/-X.Xpp
215**Volume Risk Range**: -X% to -X% (optimistic to pessimistic elasticity)
216 
217## Current Pricing Landscape
218[Pricing architecture from MSLP to shelf price]
219[Price gap analysis vs. key competitors and private label]
220 
221## Elasticity-Based Impact Model
222 
223| Scenario | Price Change | Volume Impact | Revenue Impact | Margin Impact |
224|----------|-------------|---------------|----------------|---------------|
225| [Scenario A] | +X% | −X% to −X% | +$XM to +$XM | +Xpp |
226| [Scenario B] | +X% | −X% to −X% | +$XM to +$XM | +Xpp |
227 
228## Competitive Response Analysis
229[Scenario matrix with competitor response assumptions]
230 
231## Price Pack Architecture Analysis
232[Good/Better/Best ladder with price-per-unit curve]
233 
234## Promotional Depth Optimization
235[Recommended promotional mechanics and depth with ROI by tier]
236 
237## RGM Lever Summary
238| Lever | Estimated Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
239|-------|-----------------|-----------|----------|
240| List price | $XM | High | Q[X] |
241| Mix management | $XM | Medium | Ongoing |
242| Pack optimization | $XM | Medium | Q[X] |
243 
244## Risks and Mitigations
245[Key risks with probability, impact, and contingency plans]
246```
247 
248## Analysis Framework
249 
250**Price-Volume-Profit Triangle**: Every pricing decision involves trade-offs among three dimensions. Visualize the trade-off:
251- Price increase → volume risk → margin benefit (if volume decline < price gain)
252- Price decrease → volume gain → margin risk (if margin dilution > volume gain)
253- Breakeven volume change = Price Change % / (CM% + Price Change %)
254 
255## Example
256 
257**Input**: "Cost increase of 8%. Current shelf price $4.99, COGS $2.30, margin 42.5%. Elasticity estimated at -2.0. Private label is at $3.49."
258 
259**Analysis**:
260> "An 8% cost increase raises COGS from $2.30 to $2.48, compressing margin from 42.5% to 38.5% if absorbed. **Recommended: 5% shelf price increase to $5.24 with simultaneous introduction of a 'Value Size' at $7.99/24oz ($0.33/oz vs current $0.42/oz).** The 5% increase at -2.0 elasticity yields an expected -10% volume decline on the core SKU, partially offset by trade-up to the Value Size. Net revenue impact: +$1.2M (+2.8%). Margin recovers to 40.8% (+230bps vs absorption scenario). The private label gap widens from 43% to 50% premium — approaching the danger zone. Monitor private label unit share weekly; if private label share gains >200bps in 8 weeks, deploy targeted competitive-response coupon ($0.75 off) at affected retailers."
261 
262## Guidelines
263 
264- Always model a range of elasticities, not a single point estimate
265- Include competitive response scenarios — pricing doesn't happen in a vacuum
266- Check price gaps vs. private label after every pricing action
267- Price pack architecture must maintain logical price-per-unit progression
268- Separate regular shelf pricing strategy from promotional pricing strategy
269- Calculate breakeven volume change for every pricing scenario
270- Consider retailer margin impact — retailers must accept the shelf price
271 
272## Validation Checklist
273 
274- [ ] Current pricing architecture mapped from list price to shelf price
275- [ ] Elasticity applied with confidence range (optimistic/base/pessimistic)
276- [ ] At least 3 pricing scenarios modeled with full financial impact
277- [ ] Competitive price gaps analyzed with danger zone flagging
278- [ ] Cross-price elasticity and competitor response scenarios included
279- [ ] Price pack architecture evaluated for logical step-ups
280- [ ] Promotional pricing depth optimized with ROI calculations
281- [ ] RGM lever contribution quantified
282- [ ] Breakeven volume change calculated for recommended strategy
283- [ ] Retailer margin impact assessed
284- [ ] Risks identified with monitoring triggers and contingency plans
285 

Discussion

Alternatives

Also in Pricing & offersSee all 141 in Sales →
Lead Magnet: Creating lead capture asset...Use this skill when the user says 'lead magnet', 'opt-in', 'freebie', 'list building', 'email list growth', or needs a lead capture asset with landing page copy, delivery emails, and nurture sequence. Do NOT use for full funnel design or paid ad copy.Sales & ecommerce · MITDynamic Pricing Intelligence Agent — RAISE / HOLD / LOWERData-driven pricing strategy engine for Amazon sellers. Given one or more ASINs, auto-detects each product's leaf category, analyzes the pricing landscape, and delivers RAISE/HOLD/LOWER signals with profit simulation. Supports single ASIN or batch (multiple ASINs, auto-grouped by category). Uses ZooData API endpoints with cross-validation. Use when user asks about: pricing strategy, how much to price, optimal price, price optimization, competitor pricing, price war, BuyBox strategy, profit margin, pricing analysis, should I raise price, should I lower price, price comparison, price positioning, repricing, should I raise or lower price. Requires ZOODATA_API_KEY.Sales & ecommerce · MITOffer DesignTell us what you sell, your price, and who it's for. Get back a stronger deal: better bonuses, a fair guarantee, an honest reason to buy now, and a sharper name and price.Business & ops · MITPaywall and Upgrade Screen CROWhen the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.Marketing · MIT