Porter's Five Forces skill

Perform Porter's Five Forces analysis — competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.

by phuryn·MIT license·★ 26,557 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Files of Porter's Five Forces

phuryn/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text213 lines

Porter's Five Forces

Metadata

  • Name: porters-five-forces
  • Description: Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
  • Triggers: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis, market forces, competitive dynamics

Instructions

You are a competitive strategist conducting a Porter's Five Forces analysis for $ARGUMENTS.

Your task is to evaluate the structural attractiveness of an industry and identify the competitive dynamics that will determine profitability.

Input Requirements

  • Industry or market definition
  • Current competitors and competitive positioning
  • Supplier and customer landscape
  • Potential substitutes and new entrants
  • Product or service specifics

Porter's Five Forces Framework

1. Competitive Rivalry (How intense is competition?)

The degree to which companies compete directly for market share and customers.

High Rivalry When:

  • Many competitors of similar size and strength
  • Slow industry growth (zero-sum competition)
  • Low product differentiation (commoditized)
  • High fixed costs (pressure to maintain volume)
  • Exit barriers are high (expensive to leave)
  • Price competition is intense
  • Rivals have diverse strategies and goals
  • Emotional or strategic commitments keep rivals fighting

Low Rivalry When:

  • Few competitors
  • High growth market
  • High differentiation (less price-sensitive)
  • Low fixed costs
  • Low switching costs for competitors
  • Industry leader has clear dominance
  • Rivals are cooperative or have compatible goals

Strategic Implications:

  • Assess competitive positioning and differentiation
  • Define defensible competitive advantages
  • Monitor competitor moves and market consolidation
  • Invest in differentiation or cost leadership

2. Supplier Power (How much power do suppliers have?)

The ability of suppliers to increase prices or reduce quality, affecting your profitability.

High Supplier Power When:

  • Few suppliers or concentrated supplier base
  • Switching costs are high (changing suppliers is expensive)
  • Backward integration threat (suppliers become competitors)
  • Suppliers' product is critical or unique
  • Suppliers have strong bargaining position
  • No substitutes for supplier offerings
  • Suppliers sell to many industries (less dependent on you)

Low Supplier Power When:

  • Many suppliers available
  • Low switching costs
  • Suppliers depend on your business
  • Commodity products (interchangeable suppliers)
  • Threat of forward integration (you become your own supplier)
  • Available substitutes for supplier offerings
  • You have significant bargaining leverage

Strategic Implications:

  • Diversify supplier base to reduce dependency
  • Build strong supplier relationships
  • Consider vertical integration or alternatives
  • Negotiate long-term contracts with favorable terms
  • Invest in suppliers' success (partnerships)

3. Buyer Power (How much power do customers have?)

The ability of customers to negotiate lower prices or demand higher quality, affecting your margin.

High Buyer Power When:

  • Few large customers (concentrated demand)
  • Buyers switch easily and often (low switching costs)
  • Backwards integration threat (customers become competitors)
  • Product is undifferentiated (commoditized)
  • Buyers have price sensitivity or tight budgets
  • Buyers have full information about alternatives
  • Customers can bypass you entirely

Low Buyer Power When:

  • Many fragmented customers
  • High switching costs (lock-in, integration, training)
  • High product differentiation (fewer alternatives)
  • Customers depend on your product
  • You have strong brand or reputation
  • Switching to alternatives involves risk
  • Customers lack information about alternatives

Strategic Implications:

  • Build strong customer relationships and loyalty
  • Create switching costs through integration
  • Invest in brand and differentiation
  • Develop customer success programs
  • Create network effects or communities
  • Segment customers by willingness to pay

4. Threat of Substitutes (Are there alternative solutions?)

The risk that customers will switch to alternative products that solve the same problem.

High Threat When:

  • Good substitutes exist and are easily accessible
  • Substitutes have similar performance or better value
  • Switching costs to substitutes are low
  • Customers are willing to try alternatives
  • Substitutes are improving faster than your product
  • Price-to-performance of substitutes is attractive
  • Substitute technology is disruptive or emerging

Low Threat When:

  • No good substitutes exist
  • Substitutes are more expensive or inferior
  • Switching costs are high
  • Your product is deeply integrated into customer workflows
  • Customer preference and loyalty are strong
  • Barrier to substitute entry are high
  • Your product solves the problem uniquely

Strategic Implications:

  • Monitor emerging substitutes and disruptive technologies
  • Build customer stickiness through integration and loyalty
  • Invest in product innovation and improvement
  • Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
  • Diversify into adjacent or complementary products
  • Defend through brand, service, or convenience

5. Threat of New Entrants (Can new competitors easily enter?)

The risk that new competitors will enter the market and capture share.

High Threat When:

  • Low barriers to entry (capital, expertise, licensing)
  • Attractive industry margins and growth
  • Incumbents are vulnerable or complacent
  • Distribution or channel access is available
  • Economies of scale are limited
  • Network effects are weak or absent
  • Regulation is permissive
  • New technologies enable disruption

Low Threat When:

  • High barriers to entry (capital, IP, expertise, relationships)
  • Entrenched incumbents with scale advantages
  • Strong network effects or switching costs
  • Brand loyalty is high
  • Regulatory or licensing barriers exist
  • Economies of scale create cost advantage
  • Control of critical resources or distribution
  • Retaliation by incumbents is credible

Strategic Implications:

  • Build defensible barriers (IP, brand, network effects)
  • Establish cost leadership and scale advantages
  • Create switching costs and customer lock-in
  • Invest in brand and customer relationships
  • Monitor startups and disruptors in your space
  • Build alliances and control key resources

Output Process

  1. Assess each of the five forces (High, Medium, Low)
  2. Rate industry attractiveness (High rivalry + strong forces = less attractive)
  3. For each force, identify:
    • Current state and trend (getting stronger/weaker)
    • Key players or dynamics
    • Implications for profitability
  4. Prioritize the 2-3 forces most critical to your strategy
  5. Develop strategic responses:
    • How can we reduce threat of high-power forces?
    • How can we leverage weak forces for advantage?
  6. Identify competitive positioning opportunities
  7. Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis

Industry Attractiveness

  • Attractive: Low rivalry, weak supplier/buyer power, few substitutes, high entry barriers
  • Unattractive: High rivalry, strong supplier/buyer power, many substitutes, low entry barriers
  • Moderate: Mixed dynamics requiring strategic differentiation

Notes

  • No industry is universally attractive or unattractive; position matters
  • Same industry can be attractive for some companies, unattractive for others
  • Forces change over time; re-assess as market evolves
  • Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
  • Strategy should directly address the highest-force threats

Further Reading
1---
2name: porters-five-forces
3description: "Perform Porter's Five Forces analysis — competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants. Use when analyzing industry dynamics, assessing competitive forces, or evaluating market attractiveness."
4---
5# Porter's Five Forces
6 
7## Metadata
8- **Name**: porters-five-forces
9- **Description**: Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
10- **Triggers**: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis, market forces, competitive dynamics
11 
12## Instructions
13 
14You are a competitive strategist conducting a Porter's Five Forces analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
15 
16Your task is to evaluate the structural attractiveness of an industry and identify the competitive dynamics that will determine profitability.
17 
18## Input Requirements
19- Industry or market definition
20- Current competitors and competitive positioning
21- Supplier and customer landscape
22- Potential substitutes and new entrants
23- Product or service specifics
24 
25## Porter's Five Forces Framework
26 
27### 1. Competitive Rivalry (How intense is competition?)
28The degree to which companies compete directly for market share and customers.
29 
30**High Rivalry When:**
31- Many competitors of similar size and strength
32- Slow industry growth (zero-sum competition)
33- Low product differentiation (commoditized)
34- High fixed costs (pressure to maintain volume)
35- Exit barriers are high (expensive to leave)
36- Price competition is intense
37- Rivals have diverse strategies and goals
38- Emotional or strategic commitments keep rivals fighting
39 
40**Low Rivalry When:**
41- Few competitors
42- High growth market
43- High differentiation (less price-sensitive)
44- Low fixed costs
45- Low switching costs for competitors
46- Industry leader has clear dominance
47- Rivals are cooperative or have compatible goals
48 
49**Strategic Implications:**
50- Assess competitive positioning and differentiation
51- Define defensible competitive advantages
52- Monitor competitor moves and market consolidation
53- Invest in differentiation or cost leadership
54 
55---
56 
57### 2. Supplier Power (How much power do suppliers have?)
58The ability of suppliers to increase prices or reduce quality, affecting your profitability.
59 
60**High Supplier Power When:**
61- Few suppliers or concentrated supplier base
62- Switching costs are high (changing suppliers is expensive)
63- Backward integration threat (suppliers become competitors)
64- Suppliers' product is critical or unique
65- Suppliers have strong bargaining position
66- No substitutes for supplier offerings
67- Suppliers sell to many industries (less dependent on you)
68 
69**Low Supplier Power When:**
70- Many suppliers available
71- Low switching costs
72- Suppliers depend on your business
73- Commodity products (interchangeable suppliers)
74- Threat of forward integration (you become your own supplier)
75- Available substitutes for supplier offerings
76- You have significant bargaining leverage
77 
78**Strategic Implications:**
79- Diversify supplier base to reduce dependency
80- Build strong supplier relationships
81- Consider vertical integration or alternatives
82- Negotiate long-term contracts with favorable terms
83- Invest in suppliers' success (partnerships)
84 
85---
86 
87### 3. Buyer Power (How much power do customers have?)
88The ability of customers to negotiate lower prices or demand higher quality, affecting your margin.
89 
90**High Buyer Power When:**
91- Few large customers (concentrated demand)
92- Buyers switch easily and often (low switching costs)
93- Backwards integration threat (customers become competitors)
94- Product is undifferentiated (commoditized)
95- Buyers have price sensitivity or tight budgets
96- Buyers have full information about alternatives
97- Customers can bypass you entirely
98 
99**Low Buyer Power When:**
100- Many fragmented customers
101- High switching costs (lock-in, integration, training)
102- High product differentiation (fewer alternatives)
103- Customers depend on your product
104- You have strong brand or reputation
105- Switching to alternatives involves risk
106- Customers lack information about alternatives
107 
108**Strategic Implications:**
109- Build strong customer relationships and loyalty
110- Create switching costs through integration
111- Invest in brand and differentiation
112- Develop customer success programs
113- Create network effects or communities
114- Segment customers by willingness to pay
115 
116---
117 
118### 4. Threat of Substitutes (Are there alternative solutions?)
119The risk that customers will switch to alternative products that solve the same problem.
120 
121**High Threat When:**
122- Good substitutes exist and are easily accessible
123- Substitutes have similar performance or better value
124- Switching costs to substitutes are low
125- Customers are willing to try alternatives
126- Substitutes are improving faster than your product
127- Price-to-performance of substitutes is attractive
128- Substitute technology is disruptive or emerging
129 
130**Low Threat When:**
131- No good substitutes exist
132- Substitutes are more expensive or inferior
133- Switching costs are high
134- Your product is deeply integrated into customer workflows
135- Customer preference and loyalty are strong
136- Barrier to substitute entry are high
137- Your product solves the problem uniquely
138 
139**Strategic Implications:**
140- Monitor emerging substitutes and disruptive technologies
141- Build customer stickiness through integration and loyalty
142- Invest in product innovation and improvement
143- Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
144- Diversify into adjacent or complementary products
145- Defend through brand, service, or convenience
146 
147---
148 
149### 5. Threat of New Entrants (Can new competitors easily enter?)
150The risk that new competitors will enter the market and capture share.
151 
152**High Threat When:**
153- Low barriers to entry (capital, expertise, licensing)
154- Attractive industry margins and growth
155- Incumbents are vulnerable or complacent
156- Distribution or channel access is available
157- Economies of scale are limited
158- Network effects are weak or absent
159- Regulation is permissive
160- New technologies enable disruption
161 
162**Low Threat When:**
163- High barriers to entry (capital, IP, expertise, relationships)
164- Entrenched incumbents with scale advantages
165- Strong network effects or switching costs
166- Brand loyalty is high
167- Regulatory or licensing barriers exist
168- Economies of scale create cost advantage
169- Control of critical resources or distribution
170- Retaliation by incumbents is credible
171 
172**Strategic Implications:**
173- Build defensible barriers (IP, brand, network effects)
174- Establish cost leadership and scale advantages
175- Create switching costs and customer lock-in
176- Invest in brand and customer relationships
177- Monitor startups and disruptors in your space
178- Build alliances and control key resources
179 
180---
181 
182## Output Process
1831. Assess each of the five forces (High, Medium, Low)
1842. Rate industry attractiveness (High rivalry + strong forces = less attractive)
1853. For each force, identify:
186 - Current state and trend (getting stronger/weaker)
187 - Key players or dynamics
188 - Implications for profitability
1894. Prioritize the 2-3 forces most critical to your strategy
1905. Develop strategic responses:
191 - How can we reduce threat of high-power forces?
192 - How can we leverage weak forces for advantage?
1936. Identify competitive positioning opportunities
1947. Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis
195 
196## Industry Attractiveness
197- **Attractive**: Low rivalry, weak supplier/buyer power, few substitutes, high entry barriers
198- **Unattractive**: High rivalry, strong supplier/buyer power, many substitutes, low entry barriers
199- **Moderate**: Mixed dynamics requiring strategic differentiation
200 
201## Notes
202- No industry is universally attractive or unattractive; position matters
203- Same industry can be attractive for some companies, unattractive for others
204- Forces change over time; re-assess as market evolves
205- Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
206- Strategy should directly address the highest-force threats
207 
208---
209 
210### Further Reading
211 
212- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
213 

Discussion

Alternatives

ShopifyBuild and customize Shopify stores — themes with Liquid, Storefront API, custom apps, and headless commerce with Hydrogen. Use when someone asks to build a Shopify store", "Shopify theme", "Liquid templates", "Shopify API", Shopify app", "headless Shopify", "Hydrogen storefront", "customize Shopify", Shopify product management", or "e-commerce with Shopify". Covers Liquid templating, theme development, Storefront/Admin APIs, custom apps, checkout extensions, and Hydrogen (React-based headless).Sales & ecommerce · Apache-2.0Shopify themes, apps & checkoutUse when building or customizing a Shopify store across its three code surfaces — themes (Liquid, Online Store 2.0 sections, blocks and JSON templates), apps (Remix with the versioned GraphQL Admin API and its query-cost model), and checkout (UI extensions, Functions, Web Pixels), plus the CLI flow and checkout-extensibility migration. NOT WooCommerce or PHP stores (that is `wordpress`), NOT the React layer of a headless storefront (that is `nextjs`), NOT non-Shopify payment integrations (that is `stripe`).Sales & ecommerce · MITSeerxo etsy SEOGenerate, audit, optimize, and research keywords for Etsy listings through the Seerxo remote MCP server or CLI. Use when a user wants an Etsy title, description, 13 tags, SEO score, listing rewrite, keyword ideas, quota help, or help connecting and testing Seerxo with Claude or ChatGPT.Sales & ecommerce · MITChina E-Commerce OperatorExpert China e-commerce operations specialist covering Taobao, Tmall, Pinduoduo, and JD ecosystems with deep expertise in product listing optimization, live commerce, store operations, 618/Double 11 campaigns, and cross-platform strategy.Business & ops · MIT