Partnerships Operations skill

Partner, channel, and ecosystem marketing for B2B SaaS — and the design of the partner program itself.

by shalintripathi·MIT license·★ 20 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Inside this skill

SKILL.md · the author's own words
# Partnerships Operations

## Step 0 (always first): Load brand context

**Before producing any deliverable, look for a `brand-context.md` file** in the user's project root (also check `./.claude/brand-context.md…

- **If it exists:** read it in full and treat it as binding for this run. Hand its contents to every specialist agent you route work to, al…
- **If it does not exist:** say so, point the user at the template ([`templates/brand-context.md`](../../templates/brand-context.md)), and…

**Non-negotiable regardless of which path applies:** do not invent customer names, metrics, funding, integrations, certifications, or outco…

---

## What This Is

Partnerships Operations markets *with and through other companies* rather than directly to buyers. It covers technology alliances and integ…

Word-for-word excerpt, not a result. Read the full SKILL.md ↓

Files of Partnerships Operations

shalintripathi/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text68 lines

Partnerships Operations

Step 0 (always first): Load brand context

Before producing any deliverable, look for a brand-context.md file in the user's project root (also check ./.claude/brand-context.md and ./docs/brand-context.md). It holds the company's ICP, positioning, messaging pillars, citable proof, voice, banned words, and compliance constraints.

  • If it exists: read it in full and treat it as binding for this run. Hand its contents to every specialist agent you route work to, alongside the task brief. Its "Rules for agents reading this file" section overrides an agent's own defaults.
  • If it does not exist: say so, point the user at the template (templates/brand-context.md), and offer to generate a filled draft by interviewing them or by reading their website and existing content. Then proceed with explicitly-labelled assumptions — never silently invented ones.

Non-negotiable regardless of which path applies: do not invent customer names, metrics, funding, integrations, certifications, or outcomes. Only proof recorded in brand-context.md (or supplied directly in the request) may be used as fact. Where a claim would help but no evidence exists, emit a [NEEDS INPUT: …] marker in the deliverable rather than a plausible-sounding guess.


What This Is

Partnerships Operations markets with and through other companies rather than directly to buyers. It covers technology alliances and integrations, channel and reseller motions, and the cloud-marketplace buying path that increasingly decides how enterprise software actually gets purchased — the listing, the private offer, and the committed-spend drawdown that makes a deal easy for a buyer to say yes to. It also holds the architecture underneath all of that: whether a partner program should exist yet, which motions it runs, what partners earn, how they are recruited and ramped, and who wins when two routes to market claim the same account.

The Team: 2 Specialist Agents

# Agent File What They Do
1 Partner Ecosystem Marketer agents/partner-ecosystem-marketer.md Owns partner tiering and joint business plans, co-marketing campaign design (joint webinars, co-authored research, co-branded assets, integration launches), partner enablement and MDF programs, and cloud-marketplace GTM: listing content, pricing dimensions, private offers, CPPO, and committed-spend strategy.
2 Channel Program Architect agents/partner-channel-program-architect.md Designs the program rather than marketing through it: the readiness gate that may answer "not yet", motion selection (referral, technology, services/SI, reseller), partner unit economics on both sides including partner CAC versus direct, margin/rebate/SPIF architecture with clawbacks, recruitment and first-deal certification ramp, coverage and pruning, and the rules of engagement and channel-conflict adjudication ladder — including the compensation-neutrality decision for direct reps.

How to Use

Routing User Requests

Co-marketing & alliances → Partner Ecosystem Marketer

  • "Design a joint campaign with our integration partner"
  • "Plan the launch of our new integration"
  • "Build a partner tiering model and joint business plan"
  • "Create a co-marketing kit our partners can actually run"

Marketplace GTM → Partner Ecosystem Marketer

  • "Write our AWS Marketplace listing and pricing dimensions"
  • "How should we use private offers and committed spend?"
  • "Plan a marketplace-led motion for enterprise buyers"

Program design, economics & conflict → Channel Program Architect

  • "Should we even build a partner program yet?"
  • "Which partner motion should we launch first — referral, integration, or reseller?"
  • "Model whether this reseller is worth signing, and compare partner CAC to direct"
  • "Write our rules of engagement — direct and a partner are both claiming this account"
  • "Design the margin bands, rebates and SPIFs, and what gets clawed back"
  • "Our partners all signed up and none of them sold anything"
Working Method
  1. Load brand context first (Step 0 above) and hand it to the specialist along with the brief.
  2. Route to the specialist whose remit matches the request. Where a request straddles a boundary, name the boundary and route each half to its owner rather than answering both yourself.
  3. Produce the specialist's deliverable in full, using only proof recorded in brand-context.md or supplied in the request. Emit [NEEDS INPUT: …] wherever evidence is missing rather than inventing it.
  4. Name the handoffs. State explicitly which other skill picks up the next step, so work does not dead-end.

Boundaries this skill respects. The counterparty test decides ownership: if it is a person, it belongs to social-influencer-partnerships; if it is a company with a contract or a listing, it belongs here. Earned media and third-party gatekeepers stay with the comms skill; link acquisition stays with seo-link-building-strategist. Inside this skill, the split is build-versus-market: the Channel Program Architect decides whether the program exists, which motions it runs, what the margin, incentives and rules of engagement are, and how partners are recruited and ramped; the Partner Ecosystem Marketer markets with and through the partners that program signs, and owns MDF, co-marketing, campaign kits, marketplace listings and the public tier ladder. Margin never funds a campaign and MDF never funds margin.

Output Standards

  • Every deliverable names its audience, its owner, and the decision it enables.
  • No invented customers, metrics, funding, certifications, or outcomes — [NEEDS INPUT: …] instead.
  • Cite real sources with links and read-dates when referencing external standards, platforms, or research; flag anything contested.
  • Where a recommendation depends on a number the company has not supplied (budget, headcount, current conversion rate), state the assumption in-line rather than burying it.
1---
2name: partnerships-ops
3description: "Partner, channel, and ecosystem marketing for B2B SaaS — and the design of the partner program itself. Use this skill for co-marketing with technology alliances and channel partners, integration launches, joint campaigns and content, partner tiering and enablement, cloud-marketplace go-to-market (AWS, Azure, GCP listings, private offers, committed-spend drawdown), and for channel program architecture: whether to launch a partner program at all, which motions to run (referral, technology, services/SI, reseller), partner unit economics, margin and SPIF design, partner recruitment and certification ramp, and the rules of engagement that settle a contested deal. Also triggers on: partner marketing, co-marketing, channel, reseller, VAR, MSP, distributor, OEM, alliance, ecosystem, integration launch, marketplace listing, AWS Marketplace, private offer, MDF, joint webinar, co-branded, channel conflict, rules of engagement, deal registration, partner program design, should we build a partner program, partner economics, partner P&L, partner CAC, margin stacking, SPIF, rebate, partner recruitment, partner onboarding, partner certification, partner tiers, our partners signed up and never sold anything."
4---
5 
6# Partnerships Operations
7 
8## Step 0 (always first): Load brand context
9 
10**Before producing any deliverable, look for a `brand-context.md` file** in the user's project root (also check `./.claude/brand-context.md` and `./docs/brand-context.md`). It holds the company's ICP, positioning, messaging pillars, citable proof, voice, banned words, and compliance constraints.
11 
12- **If it exists:** read it in full and treat it as binding for this run. Hand its contents to every specialist agent you route work to, alongside the task brief. Its "Rules for agents reading this file" section overrides an agent's own defaults.
13- **If it does not exist:** say so, point the user at the template ([`templates/brand-context.md`](../../templates/brand-context.md)), and offer to generate a filled draft by interviewing them or by reading their website and existing content. Then proceed with explicitly-labelled assumptions — never silently invented ones.
14 
15**Non-negotiable regardless of which path applies:** do not invent customer names, metrics, funding, integrations, certifications, or outcomes. Only proof recorded in `brand-context.md` (or supplied directly in the request) may be used as fact. Where a claim would help but no evidence exists, emit a `[NEEDS INPUT: …]` marker in the deliverable rather than a plausible-sounding guess.
16 
17---
18 
19## What This Is
20 
21Partnerships Operations markets *with and through other companies* rather than directly to buyers. It covers technology alliances and integrations, channel and reseller motions, and the cloud-marketplace buying path that increasingly decides how enterprise software actually gets purchased — the listing, the private offer, and the committed-spend drawdown that makes a deal easy for a buyer to say yes to. It also holds the architecture underneath all of that: whether a partner program should exist yet, which motions it runs, what partners earn, how they are recruited and ramped, and who wins when two routes to market claim the same account.
22 
23## The Team: 2 Specialist Agents
24 
25| # | Agent | File | What They Do |
26|---|-------|------|-------------|
27| 1 | Partner Ecosystem Marketer | `agents/partner-ecosystem-marketer.md` | Owns partner tiering and joint business plans, co-marketing campaign design (joint webinars, co-authored research, co-branded assets, integration launches), partner enablement and MDF programs, and cloud-marketplace GTM: listing content, pricing dimensions, private offers, CPPO, and committed-spend strategy. |
28| 2 | Channel Program Architect | `agents/partner-channel-program-architect.md` | Designs the program rather than marketing through it: the readiness gate that may answer "not yet", motion selection (referral, technology, services/SI, reseller), partner unit economics on both sides including partner CAC versus direct, margin/rebate/SPIF architecture with clawbacks, recruitment and first-deal certification ramp, coverage and pruning, and the rules of engagement and channel-conflict adjudication ladder — including the compensation-neutrality decision for direct reps. |
29 
30## How to Use
31 
32### Routing User Requests
33 
34**Co-marketing & alliances** → Partner Ecosystem Marketer
35- "Design a joint campaign with our integration partner"
36- "Plan the launch of our new integration"
37- "Build a partner tiering model and joint business plan"
38- "Create a co-marketing kit our partners can actually run"
39 
40**Marketplace GTM** → Partner Ecosystem Marketer
41- "Write our AWS Marketplace listing and pricing dimensions"
42- "How should we use private offers and committed spend?"
43- "Plan a marketplace-led motion for enterprise buyers"
44 
45**Program design, economics & conflict** → Channel Program Architect
46- "Should we even build a partner program yet?"
47- "Which partner motion should we launch first — referral, integration, or reseller?"
48- "Model whether this reseller is worth signing, and compare partner CAC to direct"
49- "Write our rules of engagement — direct and a partner are both claiming this account"
50- "Design the margin bands, rebates and SPIFs, and what gets clawed back"
51- "Our partners all signed up and none of them sold anything"
52 
53### Working Method
54 
551. **Load brand context first** (Step 0 above) and hand it to the specialist along with the brief.
562. **Route to the specialist** whose remit matches the request. Where a request straddles a boundary, name the boundary and route each half to its owner rather than answering both yourself.
573. **Produce the specialist's deliverable** in full, using only proof recorded in `brand-context.md` or supplied in the request. Emit `[NEEDS INPUT: …]` wherever evidence is missing rather than inventing it.
584. **Name the handoffs.** State explicitly which other skill picks up the next step, so work does not dead-end.
59 
60**Boundaries this skill respects.** The counterparty test decides ownership: if it is a **person**, it belongs to `social-influencer-partnerships`; if it is a **company with a contract or a listing**, it belongs here. Earned media and third-party gatekeepers stay with the comms skill; link acquisition stays with `seo-link-building-strategist`. Inside this skill, the split is build-versus-market: the **Channel Program Architect** decides whether the program exists, which motions it runs, what the margin, incentives and rules of engagement are, and how partners are recruited and ramped; the **Partner Ecosystem Marketer** markets with and through the partners that program signs, and owns MDF, co-marketing, campaign kits, marketplace listings and the public tier ladder. Margin never funds a campaign and MDF never funds margin.
61 
62## Output Standards
63 
64- Every deliverable names its audience, its owner, and the decision it enables.
65- No invented customers, metrics, funding, certifications, or outcomes — `[NEEDS INPUT: …]` instead.
66- Cite real sources with links and read-dates when referencing external standards, platforms, or research; flag anything contested.
67- Where a recommendation depends on a number the company has not supplied (budget, headcount, current conversion rate), state the assumption in-line rather than burying it.
68 

Discussion

Alternatives

Azure app onboardEnd-to-end orchestrator: from a business idea, app idea, or existing app to running Azure deployment with cost estimates and pre-deploy approval. Analyzes your app, auto-detects the right Azure services, scaffolds infrastructure code, and deploys — tailored to your app, not a template. Handles moving existing apps to Azure without rewriting or with minimal changes. WHEN: bring your app to Azure, plan my app, cost to run, is my code ready to deploy, deploy my app to the cloud, deploy all my services, what Azure services do I need, plan my Azure deployment, deploy my new app to Azure, one-click deploy, I have an app and want it on Azure, migrate my app to Azure, help me get started, build an app, no code yet, starter project. DO NOT USE FOR: use azd for deployment(use azure-deploy), optimizing existing costs (use cost-optimization), code readiness checks only (use azure-app-onboard-prereq).Infrastructure & ops · MITAzure App Onboard Prereq — Repository EvaluationAssess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".Infrastructure & ops · MITDocker MCP gatewayDocker's own CLI plugin: run any server from the Docker MCP Catalog in its own container, behind one connection, with secrets kept out of env vars.Coding · MITAzure Storage ServicesAzure Storage Services including Blob Storage, File Shares, Queue Storage, Table Storage, and Data Lake. Answers questions about storage access tiers (hot, cool, cold, archive), when to use each tier, and tier comparison. Provides object storage, SMB file shares, async messaging, NoSQL key-value, and big data analytics. Includes lifecycle management. USE FOR: blob storage, file shares, queue storage, table storage, data lake, upload files, download blobs, storage accounts, access tiers, storage tiers, hot cool cold archive, storage tier comparison, when to use storage tiers, lifecycle management, Azure Storage concepts. DO NOT USE FOR: SQL databases, Cosmos DB (use azure-prepare), messaging with Event Hubs or Service Bus (use azure-messaging).Infrastructure & ops · MIT