Observability and instrumentation

Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable.

How to use it

Claude Code
  1. Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into ~/.claude/skills/observability-and-instrumentation, including the files SKILL.md points to.
  2. Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit addyosmani/agent-skills/skills/observability-and-instrumentation#main ~/.claude/skills/observability-and-instrumentation

For one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/observability-and-instrumentation. This skill also uses tracing.ts — copying SKILL.md alone won't be enough. See the folder on GitHub.

Claude (web or desktop app)
  1. On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
  2. Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
  3. Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
  4. Check the skill is switched on.
  5. Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
  1. ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
  2. Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
  • Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
  • Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Step-by-step guide with screenshots · Ask in the forum

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Source of Observability and instrumentation

Show the full text239 lines
namedescription
observability-and-instrumentationInstruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data.

Observability and Instrumentation

Overview

Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.

When to Use

  • Building any feature that will run in production
  • Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
  • A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
  • Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
  • Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls

NOT for:

  • Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the debugging-and-error-recovery skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time)
  • Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the performance-optimization skill
  • Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the shipping-and-launch skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them

Process

1. Define "working" before instrumenting

Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:

FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.

If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.

2. Pick the right signal for each question
Signal Answers Cost profile Example
Structured log "What happened in this specific case?" Per-event; grows with traffic payment_failed with provider error code
Metric "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" Fixed per series; cheap to query p99 latency of provider calls
Trace "Where did time go across services?" Per-request; usually sampled One slow checkout, broken down by hop

Rule of thumb: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.

3. Structured logging

Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:

// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);

// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
logger.warn({
  event: 'payment_failed',
  paymentId: id,
  provider: 'stripe',
  errorCode: err.code,
  attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');

Log levels — use them consistently:

Level Meaning On-call action
error Invariant broken; someone may need to act Investigate
warn Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) Watch for trends
info Significant business event (order placed, job finished) None
debug Diagnostic detail Off in production by default

Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:

// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
app.use((req, res, next) => {
  req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
  req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
  res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
  next();
});

When several entry points write to one log, name the entry point. A correlation ID identifies a run; it does not say which code path started it. The same job reached by a scheduler, by a replay endpoint, and by a manual CLI run produces interchangeable lines in one sink, so attributing a line falls back to elimination — cross-reading the scheduler's history, the process table, a deploy log — and that argument holds only as long as those external records happen to still exist. Stamp the entry point where the run starts, next to the correlation ID, and propagate both the same way:

// One helper for every entry point: the run's own logger carries both fields.
// `entryPoint`, not `source` — ECS reserves `source.*` for network fields.
export const runLog = (entryPoint: 'scheduler' | 'replay_endpoint' | 'cli', runId: string) =>
  logger.child({ entryPoint, requestId: runId });

// scheduler tick        -> runLog('scheduler', crypto.randomUUID())
// POST /jobs/:id/replay -> runLog('replay_endpoint', req.id)
// CLI invocation        -> runLog('cli', process.env.RUN_ID ?? crypto.randomUUID())

Both fields have to cross the same boundaries as the correlation ID — queue metadata, HTTP headers — or a worker re-derives the entry point and guesses. A field that merely correlates with an entry point is a hint, not an attribution: anything that can invoke the job can reproduce it.

Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII. This is a hard rule from the security-and-hardening skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.

4. Metrics

For request-driven services, instrument RED on every endpoint and every external dependency: Rate (requests/sec), Errors (failure rate), Duration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use USE: Utilization, Saturation, Errors.

As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' prom-client — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.

import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';

const httpDuration = new Histogram({
  name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
  help: 'HTTP request duration',
  labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'],  // '2xx', not '200'
  buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
});

Cardinality is the failure mode. Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.

OK as label:    route="/api/tasks/:id"   status_class="5xx"   provider="stripe"
NEVER a label:  user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text

Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.

5. Distributed tracing

Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:

// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';

const sdk = new NodeSDK({
  serviceName: 'checkout-service',
  instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();

Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., applyDiscounts, chargeProvider) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.

6. Alerting

Alert on symptoms users feel, not on causes:

SYMPTOM (page-worthy):           CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
error rate > 1% for 5 min        CPU at 85%
p99 latency > 2s                 one pod restarted
queue age > 10 min               disk at 70%

Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.

Rules for every alert you create:

  1. It must be actionable. If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
  2. It links to a runbook — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
  3. It has a threshold and duration justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
  4. Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
Writing Runbooks

Rule 2 above requires every alert to link to a runbook. A runbook's job is to answer three questions without requiring the reader to think: what is happening, what to check first, and who to call if that doesn't resolve it. Store in docs/runbooks/ named after the alert.

Minimum viable runbook (three lines):

# Runbook: High Error Rate on /api/tasks
**Means:** DB connection pool likely exhausted, or a bad deploy.
**First check:** `SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type = 'client backend';`
  — if count > pool limit, see Step 2. (Swap in the equivalent for your database.)
**Escalate to:** #db-oncall or engineering on-call rotation.

When to expand beyond three lines: add steps only when the first check alone isn't enough to decide. A five-step runbook that covers the three most common causes is better than a twenty-step document that covers every edge case and gets skimmed.

Keep runbooks current. Update the runbook as part of closing every incident it was used in — a stale runbook builds false confidence. If a step was wrong or missing, fix it before marking the incident resolved.

7. Verify the telemetry itself

Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:

  • Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by requestId, confirm fields are structured (not [object Object])
  • Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
  • Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
  • Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works

Common Rationalizations

Rationalization Reality
"I'll add logging after it works" "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build.
"More logs = more observability" Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines.
"console.log is fine for now" Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once.
"We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions.
"Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does.
"User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces.
"Tracing is overkill for our two services" Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial.

Red Flags

  • A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
  • Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
  • No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
  • One log stream fed by a scheduler, a webhook, and manual runs, with no field naming which one produced the line
  • Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
  • Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
  • Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
  • Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
  • Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
  • "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy

Verification

After instrumenting a feature, confirm:

  • The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
  • All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
  • Every log sink written by more than one entry point carries an entry-point field, set where the run starts and propagated with the correlation ID rather than inferred downstream
  • No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
  • RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
  • Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
  • A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
  • Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
  • An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source

For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see ../../references/observability-checklist.md.

1---
2name: observability-and-instrumentation
3description: Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data.
4---
5 
6# Observability and Instrumentation
7 
8## Overview
9 
10Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
11 
12## When to Use
13 
14- Building any feature that will run in production
15- Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
16- A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
17- Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
18- Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
19 
20**NOT for:**
21- Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the `debugging-and-error-recovery` skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time)
22- Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the `performance-optimization` skill
23- Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the `shipping-and-launch` skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
24 
25## Process
26 
27### 1. Define "working" before instrumenting
28 
29Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
30 
31```
32FEATURE: checkout payment retry
33QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
341. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
352. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
363. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
37→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.
38```
39 
40If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
41 
42### 2. Pick the right signal for each question
43 
44| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example |
45|---|---|---|---|
46| **Structured log** | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | `payment_failed` with provider error code |
47| **Metric** | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls |
48| **Trace** | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
49 
50Rule of thumb: metrics tell you **that** something is wrong, traces tell you **where**, logs tell you **why**.
51 
52### 3. Structured logging
53 
54Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
55 
56```typescript
57// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
58logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
59 
60// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
61logger.warn({
62 event: 'payment_failed',
63 paymentId: id,
64 provider: 'stripe',
65 errorCode: err.code,
66 attempt: n,
67}, 'payment failed');
68```
69 
70**Log levels — use them consistently:**
71 
72| Level | Meaning | On-call action |
73|---|---|---|
74| `error` | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate |
75| `warn` | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends |
76| `info` | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None |
77| `debug` | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
78 
79**Correlation IDs are mandatory.** Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
80 
81```typescript
82// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
83app.use((req, res, next) => {
84 req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
85 req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
86 res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
87 next();
88});
89```
90 
91**When several entry points write to one log, name the entry point.** A correlation ID identifies a run; it does not say which code path started it. The same job reached by a scheduler, by a replay endpoint, and by a manual CLI run produces interchangeable lines in one sink, so attributing a line falls back to elimination — cross-reading the scheduler's history, the process table, a deploy log — and that argument holds only as long as those external records happen to still exist. Stamp the entry point where the run starts, next to the correlation ID, and propagate both the same way:
92 
93```typescript
94// One helper for every entry point: the run's own logger carries both fields.
95// `entryPoint`, not `source` — ECS reserves `source.*` for network fields.
96export const runLog = (entryPoint: 'scheduler' | 'replay_endpoint' | 'cli', runId: string) =>
97 logger.child({ entryPoint, requestId: runId });
98 
99// scheduler tick -> runLog('scheduler', crypto.randomUUID())
100// POST /jobs/:id/replay -> runLog('replay_endpoint', req.id)
101// CLI invocation -> runLog('cli', process.env.RUN_ID ?? crypto.randomUUID())
102```
103 
104Both fields have to cross the same boundaries as the correlation ID — queue metadata, HTTP headers — or a worker re-derives the entry point and guesses. A field that merely correlates with an entry point is a hint, not an attribution: anything that can invoke the job can reproduce it.
105 
106**Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII.** This is a hard rule from the `security-and-hardening` skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
107 
108### 4. Metrics
109 
110For request-driven services, instrument **RED** on every endpoint and every external dependency: **R**ate (requests/sec), **E**rrors (failure rate), **D**uration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use **USE**: **U**tilization, **S**aturation, **E**rrors.
111 
112As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' `prom-client` — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
113 
114```typescript
115import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
116 
117const httpDuration = new Histogram({
118 name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
119 help: 'HTTP request duration',
120 labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200'
121 buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
122});
123```
124 
125**Cardinality is the failure mode.** Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
126 
127```
128OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe"
129NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text
130```
131 
132Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
133 
134### 5. Distributed tracing
135 
136Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
137 
138```typescript
139// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
140import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
141import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
142 
143const sdk = new NodeSDK({
144 serviceName: 'checkout-service',
145 instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
146});
147sdk.start();
148```
149 
150Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., `applyDiscounts`, `chargeProvider`) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
151 
152### 6. Alerting
153 
154Alert on **symptoms users feel**, not on causes:
155 
156```
157SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
158error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85%
159p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted
160queue age > 10 min disk at 70%
161```
162 
163Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
164 
165Rules for every alert you create:
166 
1671. **It must be actionable.** If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
1682. **It links to a runbook** — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
1693. **It has a threshold and duration** justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
1704. Use two severities only: **page** (user-facing, act now) and **ticket** (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
171 
172#### Writing Runbooks
173 
174Rule 2 above requires every alert to link to a runbook. A runbook's job is to answer three questions without requiring the reader to think: what is happening, what to check first, and who to call if that doesn't resolve it. Store in `docs/runbooks/` named after the alert.
175 
176**Minimum viable runbook (three lines):**
177 
178```markdown
179# Runbook: High Error Rate on /api/tasks
180**Means:** DB connection pool likely exhausted, or a bad deploy.
181**First check:** `SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type = 'client backend';`
182 — if count > pool limit, see Step 2. (Swap in the equivalent for your database.)
183**Escalate to:** #db-oncall or engineering on-call rotation.
184```
185 
186**When to expand beyond three lines:** add steps only when the first check alone isn't enough to decide. A five-step runbook that covers the three most common causes is better than a twenty-step document that covers every edge case and gets skimmed.
187 
188**Keep runbooks current.** Update the runbook as part of closing every incident it was used in — a stale runbook builds false confidence. If a step was wrong or missing, fix it before marking the incident resolved.
189 
190### 7. Verify the telemetry itself
191 
192Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
193 
194- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by `requestId`, confirm fields are structured (not `[object Object]`)
195- Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
196- Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
197- Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
198 
199## Common Rationalizations
200 
201| Rationalization | Reality |
202|---|---|
203| "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. |
204| "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. |
205| "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. |
206| "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. |
207| "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. |
208| "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. |
209| "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
210 
211## Red Flags
212 
213- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
214- Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
215- No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
216- One log stream fed by a scheduler, a webhook, and manual runs, with no field naming which one produced the line
217- Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
218- Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
219- Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
220- Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
221- Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
222- "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
223 
224## Verification
225 
226After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
227 
228- [ ] The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
229- [ ] All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
230- [ ] Every log sink written by more than one entry point carries an entry-point field, set where the run starts and propagated with the correlation ID rather than inferred downstream
231- [ ] No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
232- [ ] RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
233- [ ] Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
234- [ ] A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
235- [ ] Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
236- [ ] An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
237 
238For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see `../../references/observability-checklist.md`.
239 

Discussion

Alternatives

Also in MonitoringSee all 533 in Development →
Professional Full-Stack Developer for Network Mapping & Monitoring ApplicationAct as a professional full-stack developer tasked with building a web application for mapping and monitoring networks using Mikrotik Netwatch API. Implement multi-user role-based management to handle devices, monitor their status, and manage user subscriptions.Coding · CC0-1.0Prompt refinerHigh-end Prompt Engineering & Prompt Refiner skill. Transforms raw or messy user requests into concise, token-efficient, high-performance master prompts for systems like GPT, Claude, and Gemini. Use when you want to optimize or redesign a prompt so it solves the problem reliably while minimizing tokens.Data & AI · CC0-1.0Constraint driven developmentEstablishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.Coding · MITPerformance optimizationOptimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.Coding · MIT