You describe the deal you're stuck in and who you're up

Win your next tough negotiation

by wondelai · MIT license · ★ 2,235 on GitHub · updated Sep 10

Win your next tough negotiation cover

You describe the deal you're stuck in and who you're up against; you get back a word-for-word game plan of what to say, what to ask, and where to hold firm.

---
name: negotiation
description: 'Prepare and execute negotiations using tactical empathy, calibrated questions, and the Ackerman method. Use when the user mentions "salary negotiation", "contract terms", "handling objections", "mirroring and labeling", "difficult conversation", "deal terms", "BATNA", "anchoring", "how do I ask for a raise", "get a better deal", or "they wont budge on price". Also trigger when preparing for a vendor negotiation, resolving a pricing dispute, or navigating a high-stakes conversation where both sides need to feel heard. Covers accusation audits, Black Swan discovery, and the "Thats Right" technique. For persuasion in product and marketing, see influence-psychology.'
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: wondelai
  version: "1.5.0"
---

# Negotiation

Tactical empathy-based negotiation framework from FBI hostage negotiator Chris Voss. Understand the emotional drivers behind decisions and use proven techniques to build rapport, uncover hidden information, and reach better outcomes.

## Core Principle

**People want to be understood and feel safe.** The most effective path to "yes" runs through empathy, active listening, and emotional intelligence -- not logic, arguments, or compromise. Treat every negotiation as a discovery process: your assumptions are hypotheses to test, and the other side's needs (respect, security, autonomy) matter more than their stated positions. Never split the difference -- no deal is better than a bad deal.

## Scoring

Overview

Tactical empathy-based negotiation framework from FBI hostage negotiator Chris Voss. Understand the emotional drivers behind decisions and use proven techniques to build rapport, uncover hidden information, and reach better outcomes.

The SKILL.md below is the copy AgentAlley read and checked. The repo has changed it since; the other files are from commit c172996.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add wondelai/skills --skill negotiation -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/wondelai/skills/tar.gz/c172996495be \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=1 skills-c172996495be/negotiation
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/208948b1cbfa1b5968fb/negotiation.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\negotiation.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\negotiation.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md18.5 KB
  • references/1 file · 16.3 KB
Read the files here
wondelai/c1729962 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text295 lines

Negotiation

Tactical empathy-based negotiation framework from FBI hostage negotiator Chris Voss. Understand the emotional drivers behind decisions and use proven techniques to build rapport, uncover hidden information, and reach better outcomes.

Core Principle

People want to be understood and feel safe. The most effective path to "yes" runs through empathy, active listening, and emotional intelligence -- not logic, arguments, or compromise. Treat every negotiation as a discovery process: your assumptions are hypotheses to test, and the other side's needs (respect, security, autonomy) matter more than their stated positions. Never split the difference -- no deal is better than a bad deal.

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. Score 1 point per satisfied Quick Diagnostic row (6 rows), plus up to 4 points for execution quality: emotions labeled out loud (+1), "That's right" earned not "You're right" (+1), no "Why?" / no splitting the difference / no chasing "yes" (+1), at least one Black Swan surfaced (+1). Bands: 9-10 = audit delivered, calibrated questions and BATNA prepared, "That's right" achieved, Black Swans hunted; 5-6 = some prep but arguing the position or chasing "yes"; <=3 = no audit, no BATNA, splitting the difference. Always state the current score and the specific gaps to reach 10/10.

Framework

1. Tactical Empathy

Core concept: Consciously imagine yourself in the counterpart's situation, then vocalize their perspective to create trust and openness.

Why it works: When people feel understood, brain chemistry shifts toward trust and cooperation, short-circuiting defensive reactions. Empathy is not agreement -- you can understand their position while advocating your own.

Key insights:

  • Before responding, ask: "What is their world like right now?"
  • Articulate their situation, pressures, and fears before stating your position
  • Empathy must be genuine, not performed -- people detect fakeness instantly
  • Unconditional positive regard: respect them as a person regardless of disagreement
  • Emotions are contagious -- stay calm and positive; slow pace enables clear thinking

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Customer support Acknowledge frustration before solving "I understand this outage is affecting your team's deadline"
Sales calls Voice the prospect's pressures "It sounds like you're under pressure to show results this quarter"
Pricing conversations Acknowledge budget constraints upfront "I know adding another tool to the stack feels risky right now"

Copy patterns:

  • "I understand you're dealing with..."
  • "It seems like this is creating pressure for your team..."
  • "Before we talk about next steps, I want to make sure I understand where you're coming from..."

See references/techniques.md for the full 21-technique reference -- each section below points to the part you need at the moment you need it. Open it now for The Power of Apology and Pause, which has no section here.

2. Mirroring

Core concept: Repeat the last 1-3 critical words your counterpart said, with a curious, upward-inflecting tone, then go silent.

Why it works: Mirroring signals deep listening, creating familiarity and rapport. It prompts elaboration without direct questions, revealing more than the counterpart intended to share.

Key insights:

  • Repeat the key or emotion-laden words back as a gentle question
  • Wait silently (4+ seconds) for them to expand
  • Works in person, on the phone, and in written communication
  • The simplest technique, but often the most effective for information gathering

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Discovery calls Mirror key concerns to get elaboration Client: "The timeline is tight." You: "The timeline is tight?"
User interviews Encourage deeper explanation of pain User: "It's just frustrating." You: "Frustrating?"
Objection handling Reflect to find the root cause "Doesn't fit your budget?"

Copy patterns:

  • "[Key phrase they used]?" (with question mark)
  • "You mentioned [their exact words]..."
  • "When you say [mirror], what does that look like?"
3. Labeling

Core concept: Identify and verbalize the counterpart's emotions or perspective using neutral phrases: "It seems like...", "It sounds like...", "It looks like..."

Why it works: Naming emotions validates them -- labeling negative emotions diffuses their power, labeling positive emotions reinforces them. The tentative phrasing gives room to correct you, which deepens the conversation either way.

Key insights:

  • Always use third-person phrasing ("It seems like..."), never "I think you..."
  • After labeling, be silent -- let them respond
  • A wrong label still pays: their correction is valuable information
  • Watch for emotional shifts that signal you've hit the mark

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Customer complaints Name the frustration before solving "It sounds like you feel let down by our response time"
Sales objections Label the underlying concern "It seems like there's a concern about implementation risk"
Churn prevention Identify the real reason for leaving "It sounds like something changed since you first signed up"

Copy patterns:

  • "It seems like..."
  • "It sounds like you're feeling..."
  • "If I'm reading this right, it feels like..."
4. Calibrated Questions

Core concept: Open-ended "How...?" and "What...?" questions that shape the conversation while giving the counterpart the illusion of control.

Why it works: Calibrated questions engage the counterpart's problem-solving mind, making them feel in charge while you steer. They force the other side to consider your position without you stating it, and avoid the defensiveness "Why?" creates.

Key insights:

  • Start with "How" or "What" -- avoid "Why" (sounds accusatory)
  • "How am I supposed to do that?" is the most powerful pushback without saying no
  • Keep the tone genuinely collaborative, never sarcastic
  • Exception for "Why": only when you want them to defend something favorable to you ("Why would you ever choose our company?")
  • Follow every "yes" with "How...?" to secure implementation commitment

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Price negotiation Push back without refusing "How am I supposed to do that at that price point?"
Scope creep Make them own the constraint "What happens to the timeline if we add this?"
Stakeholder alignment Uncover hidden decision-makers "How does your team typically make decisions like this?"

Copy patterns:

  • "How am I supposed to do that?"
  • "What's the biggest challenge you're facing?"
  • "What would it take to make this happen?"

For No-oriented questions ("Would it be unreasonable to...?") and tactical mislabeling to draw out a corrective "No", see techniques.md section 8 when a counterpart is guarded or stalling.

5. Accusation Audit

Core concept: Before negotiating, list and preemptively verbalize every negative thing the counterpart might think or say about you.

Why it works: Naming fears and criticisms before the other side does removes their power -- it often triggers reassurance ("Oh, I don't think that...") and at minimum neutralizes objections. Addressing the elephants first demonstrates self-awareness and builds trust.

Key insights:

  • Brainstorm every negative they might think before the meeting
  • Deliver the audit early in the conversation, not after objections surface
  • Overshoot on purpose -- the list should sound slightly worse than what they actually think
  • Particularly powerful when you're the party with less leverage

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Price increase announcement Preempt anger before explaining "You're probably thinking we don't value your loyalty..."
Sales cold outreach Acknowledge the intrusion "I know you're busy and the last thing you want is another sales pitch..."
Service failure recovery Own the failure fully "You're probably furious, and you have every right to be..."

Copy patterns:

  • "You probably think..."
  • "I know this might seem like..."
  • "You might be wondering why you should even listen to..."
6. "That's Right"

Core concept: Summarize the counterpart's position -- facts, emotions, and concerns -- so accurately that they respond with "That's right." This is the breakthrough moment in any negotiation.

Why it works: "That's right" signals the person feels completely understood, shifting their mindset from adversarial to collaborative. It is fundamentally different from "You're right," which usually means they're dismissing you.

Key insights:

  • "That's right" is the two most powerful words in negotiation; if you get "You're right," keep working -- you haven't connected yet
  • Include emotional subtext in your summary, not just facts
  • Let them say "No" first to feel safe, then work toward "That's right"
  • Use the Rule of Three: confirm agreement three times in three different ways

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Sales closing Summarize their needs before proposing "So your team needs X, you're worried about Y, and Z is the deal-breaker..."
Customer retention Show you understand why they're leaving "Let me make sure I have this: the product isn't delivering on the promise we made..."
Negotiation closure Confirm understanding before terms "Let me make sure I understand: you need [X], by [date], and [constraint]..."

Copy patterns:

  • "Let me make sure I understand..."
  • "If I'm hearing you correctly..."
  • "It sounds like [complete summary of their position including emotions]..."

For the three types of Yes (counterfeit, confirmation, commitment) and the Rule of Three confirmation sequence, see techniques.md sections 10-11 when closing or locking in a commitment.

7. Ackerman Bargaining

Core concept: A systematic monetary negotiation method: calculated offers in decreasing increments (65% -> 85% -> 95% -> 100% of target) with precise non-round numbers and a non-monetary bonus at the end.

Why it works: Decreasing increments signal you're approaching your limit, and precise numbers ($47,235 vs $47,000) feel calculated and final. The closing non-monetary gift signals generosity at the limit, making it psychologically harder to ask for more.

Key insights:

  • Set your target price first, then open at 65% and raise in decreasing increments: 85% -> 95% -> 100%
  • Use precise, non-round numbers on the final offer ($10,230 not $10,000)
  • Attach a non-monetary bonus to the final offer ("...and I'll include X")
  • Never make a concession without getting something in return

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Salary negotiation Structure counter-offers systematically Target $120K: open at $78K, move to $102K, $114K, final $120,350 + extra PTO
Vendor pricing Methodical price reduction Target $50K: start $32.5K, move to $42.5K, $47.5K, final $49,850 + extended payment terms
SaaS enterprise deals Multi-year pricing negotiations Decreasing discount increments across contract years

Copy patterns:

  • "Based on our analysis, we can offer $[precise number]..."
  • "We've stretched as far as we can -- $[precise number], and we'll include [non-monetary bonus]"
  • "I've gone back to my team and the absolute best we can do is $[precise number]"

For setting the opening anchor, soft range-anchoring, and framing loss aversion, see techniques.md section 14 before you name the first number.

8. Black Swans

Core concept: Hidden, game-changing pieces of information that transform a negotiation once discovered. Every negotiation has approximately three lurking.

Why it works: Negotiations stall or fail when critical information stays hidden. Black Swans -- the unknown unknowns -- explain seemingly irrational behavior, and discovering even one can turn a stalemate into a breakthrough.

Key insights:

  • Three types: secret constraints (boss capped the budget), hidden motivations (this deal saves their job), unknown context (a competitor just moved)
  • Watch for anomalies -- odd reactions, hesitations, inconsistencies -- and listen in unguarded moments before and after meetings
  • If they seem irrational, diagnose: ill-informed, constrained, or hiding something?
  • Use all three leverage types -- positive (what they want), negative (what they fear), normative (their own stated values) -- to surface hidden information

Product applications:

Context Application Example
Enterprise sales Discover hidden budget or timeline constraints "What happens internally if this doesn't get resolved by Q3?"
Churn analysis Uncover the real cancellation reason "It seems like something changed -- what happened?"
Hiring negotiations Discover the candidate's true priorities "What would make you regret not taking this offer?"

Copy patterns:

  • "What's the biggest thing I'm missing here?"
  • "Help me understand -- what's really driving this?"
  • "What would change everything about this situation?"

For applying the three leverage types, reading pronoun shifts that reveal who really decides, and using dynamic silence to draw out hidden information, see techniques.md sections 16, 20, and 21 when a negotiation stalls or you suspect a hidden decision-maker.

Handling Common Situations

  • They say "That's not fair": Stop immediately: "I want to be fair. Have I done something unfair? Let's discuss it."
  • They anchor with an extreme number: Don't counter; ask "How did you arrive at that figure?"
  • They stop responding: Send "Have you given up on [the project]?" -- triggers a "No" response
  • They seem irrational: Diagnose with calibrated questions: ill-informed, constrained, or hiding something?

Counterpart Styles

Style Signs Adapt by...
Analyst Methodical, data-driven, hates surprises Use facts, be patient, don't rush
Accommodator Friendly, relationship-focused, avoids conflict Build rapport, but pin down specifics
Assertive Direct, time-conscious, wants to win Be efficient, stand firm, acknowledge their points

Insight: Great negotiators borrow from all three styles as needed.

Voice and Delivery

  • Default voice: Positive, warm, light-hearted (with a smile)
  • Critical moments: Late-Night DJ Voice -- slow, calm, downward inflection
  • After key statements: Pause 4+ seconds (tactical silence)
  • Watch their nonverbals: 7% words, 38% tone, 55% body language

See techniques.md sections 4 and 19 when you need the full Late-Night DJ Voice mechanics and the cues to read in their body language.

Common Mistakes

Mistake Why It Fails Fix
Splitting the difference Lukewarm outcomes nobody is happy with Hold firm; no deal is better than a bad deal
Pushing for "yes" Makes people defensive; produces counterfeit agreement Pursue "That's right"; let them say "No" first
Arguing your position Triggers resistance and shuts down listening Use calibrated questions and labels to let them talk
Skipping the accusation audit Unaddressed objections fester and derail later List every negative they might think; address early
Countering an extreme anchor immediately Validates their anchor as the starting point Mirror, label, ask "How did you arrive at that?"
Using "Why?" Sounds accusatory and triggers defensiveness Replace with "What" and "How" questions
Treating "You're right" as success It means they want you to go away Keep working toward "That's right"

Quick Diagnostic

Question If No Action
Have I prepared an accusation audit? Objections will blindside you List every negative they might think; address early
Do I have 3-5 calibrated questions ready? You'll default to arguing Draft "How" and "What" questions targeting their needs
Have I identified my BATNA? You'll accept a bad deal under pressure Define your walk-away point before negotiating
Am I aiming for "That's right"? You'll chase counterfeit "yes" Summarize their position until they affirm genuinely
Have I considered their negotiation style? One-size-fits-all will misfire Assess if they're Analyst, Accommodator, or Assertive
Am I hunting for Black Swans? You'll miss game-changing information Stay curious; watch for anomalies; ask about the unexpected

Further Reading

Based on Chris Voss's experience as an FBI hostage negotiator:

  • "Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It" by Chris Voss with Tahl Raz
  • "The Full Fee Agent: How to Stack the Odds in Your Favor as a Real Estate Professional" by Chris Voss and Steve Shull (the same principles applied to real estate and professional services)

About the Author

Chris Voss is a former FBI lead international kidnapping negotiator who worked over 150 hostage situations in a 24-year career, and the founder of the Black Swan Group, which trains businesses in tactical negotiation. He has taught at Harvard Law School, Georgetown, and MIT Sloan; Never Split the Difference is one of the most widely recommended business books in the world.

1---
2name: negotiation
3description: 'Prepare and execute negotiations using tactical empathy, calibrated questions, and the Ackerman method. Use when the user mentions "salary negotiation", "contract terms", "handling objections", "mirroring and labeling", "difficult conversation", "deal terms", "BATNA", "anchoring", "how do I ask for a raise", "get a better deal", or "they wont budge on price". Also trigger when preparing for a vendor negotiation, resolving a pricing dispute, or navigating a high-stakes conversation where both sides need to feel heard. Covers accusation audits, Black Swan discovery, and the "Thats Right" technique. For persuasion in product and marketing, see influence-psychology.'
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 author: wondelai
7 version: "1.5.0"
8---
9 
10# Negotiation
11 
12Tactical empathy-based negotiation framework from FBI hostage negotiator Chris Voss. Understand the emotional drivers behind decisions and use proven techniques to build rapport, uncover hidden information, and reach better outcomes.
13 
14## Core Principle
15 
16**People want to be understood and feel safe.** The most effective path to "yes" runs through empathy, active listening, and emotional intelligence -- not logic, arguments, or compromise. Treat every negotiation as a discovery process: your assumptions are hypotheses to test, and the other side's needs (respect, security, autonomy) matter more than their stated positions. Never split the difference -- no deal is better than a bad deal.
17 
18## Scoring
19 
20**Goal: 10/10.** Score 1 point per satisfied Quick Diagnostic row (6 rows), plus up to 4 points for execution quality: emotions labeled out loud (+1), "That's right" earned not "You're right" (+1), no "Why?" / no splitting the difference / no chasing "yes" (+1), at least one Black Swan surfaced (+1). Bands: **9-10** = audit delivered, calibrated questions and BATNA prepared, "That's right" achieved, Black Swans hunted; **5-6** = some prep but arguing the position or chasing "yes"; **<=3** = no audit, no BATNA, splitting the difference. Always state the current score and the specific gaps to reach 10/10.
21 
22## Framework
23 
24### 1. Tactical Empathy
25 
26**Core concept:** Consciously imagine yourself in the counterpart's situation, then vocalize their perspective to create trust and openness.
27 
28**Why it works:** When people feel understood, brain chemistry shifts toward trust and cooperation, short-circuiting defensive reactions. Empathy is not agreement -- you can understand their position while advocating your own.
29 
30**Key insights:**
31- Before responding, ask: "What is their world like right now?"
32- Articulate their situation, pressures, and fears before stating your position
33- Empathy must be genuine, not performed -- people detect fakeness instantly
34- Unconditional positive regard: respect them as a person regardless of disagreement
35- Emotions are contagious -- stay calm and positive; slow pace enables clear thinking
36 
37**Product applications:**
38 
39| Context | Application | Example |
40|---------|-------------|---------|
41| **Customer support** | Acknowledge frustration before solving | "I understand this outage is affecting your team's deadline" |
42| **Sales calls** | Voice the prospect's pressures | "It sounds like you're under pressure to show results this quarter" |
43| **Pricing conversations** | Acknowledge budget constraints upfront | "I know adding another tool to the stack feels risky right now" |
44 
45**Copy patterns:**
46- "I understand you're dealing with..."
47- "It seems like this is creating pressure for your team..."
48- "Before we talk about next steps, I want to make sure I understand where you're coming from..."
49 
50See [references/techniques.md](references/techniques.md) for the full 21-technique reference -- each section below points to the part you need at the moment you need it. Open it now for The Power of Apology and Pause, which has no section here.
51 
52### 2. Mirroring
53 
54**Core concept:** Repeat the last 1-3 critical words your counterpart said, with a curious, upward-inflecting tone, then go silent.
55 
56**Why it works:** Mirroring signals deep listening, creating familiarity and rapport. It prompts elaboration without direct questions, revealing more than the counterpart intended to share.
57 
58**Key insights:**
59- Repeat the key or emotion-laden words back as a gentle question
60- Wait silently (4+ seconds) for them to expand
61- Works in person, on the phone, and in written communication
62- The simplest technique, but often the most effective for information gathering
63 
64**Product applications:**
65 
66| Context | Application | Example |
67|---------|-------------|---------|
68| **Discovery calls** | Mirror key concerns to get elaboration | Client: "The timeline is tight." You: "The timeline is tight?" |
69| **User interviews** | Encourage deeper explanation of pain | User: "It's just frustrating." You: "Frustrating?" |
70| **Objection handling** | Reflect to find the root cause | "Doesn't fit your budget?" |
71 
72**Copy patterns:**
73- "[Key phrase they used]?" (with question mark)
74- "You mentioned [their exact words]..."
75- "When you say [mirror], what does that look like?"
76 
77### 3. Labeling
78 
79**Core concept:** Identify and verbalize the counterpart's emotions or perspective using neutral phrases: "It seems like...", "It sounds like...", "It looks like..."
80 
81**Why it works:** Naming emotions validates them -- labeling negative emotions diffuses their power, labeling positive emotions reinforces them. The tentative phrasing gives room to correct you, which deepens the conversation either way.
82 
83**Key insights:**
84- Always use third-person phrasing ("It seems like..."), never "I think you..."
85- After labeling, be silent -- let them respond
86- A wrong label still pays: their correction is valuable information
87- Watch for emotional shifts that signal you've hit the mark
88 
89**Product applications:**
90 
91| Context | Application | Example |
92|---------|-------------|---------|
93| **Customer complaints** | Name the frustration before solving | "It sounds like you feel let down by our response time" |
94| **Sales objections** | Label the underlying concern | "It seems like there's a concern about implementation risk" |
95| **Churn prevention** | Identify the real reason for leaving | "It sounds like something changed since you first signed up" |
96 
97**Copy patterns:**
98- "It seems like..."
99- "It sounds like you're feeling..."
100- "If I'm reading this right, it feels like..."
101 
102### 4. Calibrated Questions
103 
104**Core concept:** Open-ended "How...?" and "What...?" questions that shape the conversation while giving the counterpart the illusion of control.
105 
106**Why it works:** Calibrated questions engage the counterpart's problem-solving mind, making them feel in charge while you steer. They force the other side to consider your position without you stating it, and avoid the defensiveness "Why?" creates.
107 
108**Key insights:**
109- Start with "How" or "What" -- avoid "Why" (sounds accusatory)
110- "How am I supposed to do that?" is the most powerful pushback without saying no
111- Keep the tone genuinely collaborative, never sarcastic
112- Exception for "Why": only when you want them to defend something favorable to you ("Why would you ever choose our company?")
113- Follow every "yes" with "How...?" to secure implementation commitment
114 
115**Product applications:**
116 
117| Context | Application | Example |
118|---------|-------------|---------|
119| **Price negotiation** | Push back without refusing | "How am I supposed to do that at that price point?" |
120| **Scope creep** | Make them own the constraint | "What happens to the timeline if we add this?" |
121| **Stakeholder alignment** | Uncover hidden decision-makers | "How does your team typically make decisions like this?" |
122 
123**Copy patterns:**
124- "How am I supposed to do that?"
125- "What's the biggest challenge you're facing?"
126- "What would it take to make this happen?"
127 
128For No-oriented questions ("Would it be unreasonable to...?") and tactical mislabeling to draw out a corrective "No", see techniques.md section 8 when a counterpart is guarded or stalling.
129 
130### 5. Accusation Audit
131 
132**Core concept:** Before negotiating, list and preemptively verbalize every negative thing the counterpart might think or say about you.
133 
134**Why it works:** Naming fears and criticisms before the other side does removes their power -- it often triggers reassurance ("Oh, I don't think that...") and at minimum neutralizes objections. Addressing the elephants first demonstrates self-awareness and builds trust.
135 
136**Key insights:**
137- Brainstorm every negative they might think before the meeting
138- Deliver the audit early in the conversation, not after objections surface
139- Overshoot on purpose -- the list should sound slightly worse than what they actually think
140- Particularly powerful when you're the party with less leverage
141 
142**Product applications:**
143 
144| Context | Application | Example |
145|---------|-------------|---------|
146| **Price increase announcement** | Preempt anger before explaining | "You're probably thinking we don't value your loyalty..." |
147| **Sales cold outreach** | Acknowledge the intrusion | "I know you're busy and the last thing you want is another sales pitch..." |
148| **Service failure recovery** | Own the failure fully | "You're probably furious, and you have every right to be..." |
149 
150**Copy patterns:**
151- "You probably think..."
152- "I know this might seem like..."
153- "You might be wondering why you should even listen to..."
154 
155### 6. "That's Right"
156 
157**Core concept:** Summarize the counterpart's position -- facts, emotions, and concerns -- so accurately that they respond with "That's right." This is the breakthrough moment in any negotiation.
158 
159**Why it works:** "That's right" signals the person feels completely understood, shifting their mindset from adversarial to collaborative. It is fundamentally different from "You're right," which usually means they're dismissing you.
160 
161**Key insights:**
162- "That's right" is the two most powerful words in negotiation; if you get "You're right," keep working -- you haven't connected yet
163- Include emotional subtext in your summary, not just facts
164- Let them say "No" first to feel safe, then work toward "That's right"
165- Use the Rule of Three: confirm agreement three times in three different ways
166 
167**Product applications:**
168 
169| Context | Application | Example |
170|---------|-------------|---------|
171| **Sales closing** | Summarize their needs before proposing | "So your team needs X, you're worried about Y, and Z is the deal-breaker..." |
172| **Customer retention** | Show you understand why they're leaving | "Let me make sure I have this: the product isn't delivering on the promise we made..." |
173| **Negotiation closure** | Confirm understanding before terms | "Let me make sure I understand: you need [X], by [date], and [constraint]..." |
174 
175**Copy patterns:**
176- "Let me make sure I understand..."
177- "If I'm hearing you correctly..."
178- "It sounds like [complete summary of their position including emotions]..."
179 
180For the three types of Yes (counterfeit, confirmation, commitment) and the Rule of Three confirmation sequence, see techniques.md sections 10-11 when closing or locking in a commitment.
181 
182### 7. Ackerman Bargaining
183 
184**Core concept:** A systematic monetary negotiation method: calculated offers in decreasing increments (65% -> 85% -> 95% -> 100% of target) with precise non-round numbers and a non-monetary bonus at the end.
185 
186**Why it works:** Decreasing increments signal you're approaching your limit, and precise numbers ($47,235 vs $47,000) feel calculated and final. The closing non-monetary gift signals generosity at the limit, making it psychologically harder to ask for more.
187 
188**Key insights:**
189- Set your target price first, then open at 65% and raise in decreasing increments: 85% -> 95% -> 100%
190- Use precise, non-round numbers on the final offer ($10,230 not $10,000)
191- Attach a non-monetary bonus to the final offer ("...and I'll include X")
192- Never make a concession without getting something in return
193 
194**Product applications:**
195 
196| Context | Application | Example |
197|---------|-------------|---------|
198| **Salary negotiation** | Structure counter-offers systematically | Target $120K: open at $78K, move to $102K, $114K, final $120,350 + extra PTO |
199| **Vendor pricing** | Methodical price reduction | Target $50K: start $32.5K, move to $42.5K, $47.5K, final $49,850 + extended payment terms |
200| **SaaS enterprise deals** | Multi-year pricing negotiations | Decreasing discount increments across contract years |
201 
202**Copy patterns:**
203- "Based on our analysis, we can offer $[precise number]..."
204- "We've stretched as far as we can -- $[precise number], and we'll include [non-monetary bonus]"
205- "I've gone back to my team and the absolute best we can do is $[precise number]"
206 
207For setting the opening anchor, soft range-anchoring, and framing loss aversion, see techniques.md section 14 before you name the first number.
208 
209### 8. Black Swans
210 
211**Core concept:** Hidden, game-changing pieces of information that transform a negotiation once discovered. Every negotiation has approximately three lurking.
212 
213**Why it works:** Negotiations stall or fail when critical information stays hidden. Black Swans -- the unknown unknowns -- explain seemingly irrational behavior, and discovering even one can turn a stalemate into a breakthrough.
214 
215**Key insights:**
216- Three types: secret constraints (boss capped the budget), hidden motivations (this deal saves their job), unknown context (a competitor just moved)
217- Watch for anomalies -- odd reactions, hesitations, inconsistencies -- and listen in unguarded moments before and after meetings
218- If they seem irrational, diagnose: ill-informed, constrained, or hiding something?
219- Use all three leverage types -- positive (what they want), negative (what they fear), normative (their own stated values) -- to surface hidden information
220 
221**Product applications:**
222 
223| Context | Application | Example |
224|---------|-------------|---------|
225| **Enterprise sales** | Discover hidden budget or timeline constraints | "What happens internally if this doesn't get resolved by Q3?" |
226| **Churn analysis** | Uncover the real cancellation reason | "It seems like something changed -- what happened?" |
227| **Hiring negotiations** | Discover the candidate's true priorities | "What would make you regret not taking this offer?" |
228 
229**Copy patterns:**
230- "What's the biggest thing I'm missing here?"
231- "Help me understand -- what's really driving this?"
232- "What would change everything about this situation?"
233 
234For applying the three leverage types, reading pronoun shifts that reveal who really decides, and using dynamic silence to draw out hidden information, see techniques.md sections 16, 20, and 21 when a negotiation stalls or you suspect a hidden decision-maker.
235 
236## Handling Common Situations
237 
238- **They say "That's not fair":** Stop immediately: "I want to be fair. Have I done something unfair? Let's discuss it."
239- **They anchor with an extreme number:** Don't counter; ask "How did you arrive at that figure?"
240- **They stop responding:** Send "Have you given up on [the project]?" -- triggers a "No" response
241- **They seem irrational:** Diagnose with calibrated questions: ill-informed, constrained, or hiding something?
242 
243## Counterpart Styles
244 
245| Style | Signs | Adapt by... |
246|-------|-------|-------------|
247| **Analyst** | Methodical, data-driven, hates surprises | Use facts, be patient, don't rush |
248| **Accommodator** | Friendly, relationship-focused, avoids conflict | Build rapport, but pin down specifics |
249| **Assertive** | Direct, time-conscious, wants to win | Be efficient, stand firm, acknowledge their points |
250 
251**Insight:** Great negotiators borrow from all three styles as needed.
252 
253## Voice and Delivery
254 
255- **Default voice**: Positive, warm, light-hearted (with a smile)
256- **Critical moments**: Late-Night DJ Voice -- slow, calm, downward inflection
257- **After key statements**: Pause 4+ seconds (tactical silence)
258- **Watch their nonverbals**: 7% words, 38% tone, 55% body language
259 
260See techniques.md sections 4 and 19 when you need the full Late-Night DJ Voice mechanics and the cues to read in their body language.
261 
262## Common Mistakes
263 
264| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
265|---------|-------------|------|
266| **Splitting the difference** | Lukewarm outcomes nobody is happy with | Hold firm; no deal is better than a bad deal |
267| **Pushing for "yes"** | Makes people defensive; produces counterfeit agreement | Pursue "That's right"; let them say "No" first |
268| **Arguing your position** | Triggers resistance and shuts down listening | Use calibrated questions and labels to let them talk |
269| **Skipping the accusation audit** | Unaddressed objections fester and derail later | List every negative they might think; address early |
270| **Countering an extreme anchor immediately** | Validates their anchor as the starting point | Mirror, label, ask "How did you arrive at that?" |
271| **Using "Why?"** | Sounds accusatory and triggers defensiveness | Replace with "What" and "How" questions |
272| **Treating "You're right" as success** | It means they want you to go away | Keep working toward "That's right" |
273 
274## Quick Diagnostic
275 
276| Question | If No | Action |
277|----------|-------|--------|
278| Have I prepared an accusation audit? | Objections will blindside you | List every negative they might think; address early |
279| Do I have 3-5 calibrated questions ready? | You'll default to arguing | Draft "How" and "What" questions targeting their needs |
280| Have I identified my BATNA? | You'll accept a bad deal under pressure | Define your walk-away point before negotiating |
281| Am I aiming for "That's right"? | You'll chase counterfeit "yes" | Summarize their position until they affirm genuinely |
282| Have I considered their negotiation style? | One-size-fits-all will misfire | Assess if they're Analyst, Accommodator, or Assertive |
283| Am I hunting for Black Swans? | You'll miss game-changing information | Stay curious; watch for anomalies; ask about the unexpected |
284 
285## Further Reading
286 
287Based on Chris Voss's experience as an FBI hostage negotiator:
288 
289- *"Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It"* by Chris Voss with Tahl Raz
290- *"The Full Fee Agent: How to Stack the Odds in Your Favor as a Real Estate Professional"* by Chris Voss and Steve Shull (the same principles applied to real estate and professional services)
291 
292## About the Author
293 
294**Chris Voss** is a former FBI lead international kidnapping negotiator who worked over 150 hostage situations in a 24-year career, and the founder of the Black Swan Group, which trains businesses in tactical negotiation. He has taught at Harvard Law School, Georgetown, and MIT Sloan; *Never Split the Difference* is one of the most widely recommended business books in the world.
295 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 10, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 2,235
Checked
Source
wondelai/skills ↗
Creator
wondelai · 320 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
SkillCurated aphorism collection with CRUDAphorismsdanielmiessler/LifeOS · by danielmiesslerCurated aphorism collection with CRUD — content-based matching, themed search, thinker research, DB maintenance. Quotes organized by author/theme/context/usage to prevent repetition. Four workflows: FindAphorism, AddAphorism, ResearchThinker, SearchAphorisms. Themes: Stoicism, Wisdom, Truth-seeking, Excellence, Resilience, Curiosity. USE WHEN aphorism, quote, find a quote, research thinker, add aphorism, quote for newsletter, what did X say about, quote bank. NOT FOR creative writing or social posts.★ 19.3k GitHub starsSkillNegotiates a commercial deal without giving away the termsDeal negotiationcbrock84/headcount · by cbrock84Negotiates a commercial deal without giving away the terms that matter — preparing your walk-away and theirs, trading concessions rather than conceding them, recognizing the tactics that create false urgency, protecting price by moving other variables, and closing on terms someone can actually deliver. Use this to prepare for a negotiation, respond to a demand mid-deal, work out why discounts keep landing at quarter end, or review terms before they are signed.★ 2k GitHub starsSkillInfluence and negotiation toolkit for any interactionsamber/cc-skills · by samberInfluence and negotiation toolkit for any interaction needing another person's agreement, even when the user never says 'negotiation'. Covers B2B sales, salary reviews and raise asks, collective bargaining and unions, hard 1:1s, recruitment closes, cross-cultural deals, mediation, and diplomatic messages — declining, pushing back on scope, justifying a delay, raising a concern, getting alignment. Use when the user says 'they just said X, what do I say' or 'draft a reply', or mentions a buyer, champion, procurement, RFP, sponsor, HR, union, or candidate, or a pushback, refusal, ghosting, no-decision, escalation, fixed budget, counter-offer, comp band, strike, BATNA, anchor, or concession.★ 222 GitHub starsSkillCreates professional case studies, engagement summariesCase Study Builder Assistantrealjaymes/marketingagentskills · by realjaymesCreates professional case studies, engagement summaries, and project summaries. Use when the user wants to create a 'case study,' 'client success story,' 'engagement summary,' 'project summary,' or 'portfolio piece.'★ 65 GitHub starsSkillTurn any YouTube video into a beautiful case-study📊 YouTube to Case Studytstfully/youtube-to-case-study · by tstfullyTurn any YouTube video (founder interview, product teardown, conference talk, marketing breakdown, UX walkthrough, podcast) into a beautiful case-study slideshow: one HTML file that opens in any browser, built on reveal.js, with speaker notes and every fact linked to the exact second in the video. Use this skill whenever someone wants a case study, business case study, marketing case study, UX case study, product teardown, growth teardown, competitor breakdown, swipe file, lesson deck, or presentation / slides / deck from a YouTube video or link. Also trigger on 'turn this video into a case study', 'make slides from this YouTube video', 'case study from this talk', 'teardown of this video', 'youtube to slides', 'youtube to presentation', or 'summarize this video as a deck'. Works for marketers, educators, product managers, students, and consultants; no coding needed.★ 3 GitHub starsSkillTell us what you sell and who buys it; get back a pitchSales materials that help you close dealscoreyhaines31/marketingskills · by coreyhaines31Tell us what you sell and who buys it; get back a pitch outline, a one-page leave-behind, and ready answers to the objections you hear most.★ 51.1k GitHub stars

More from wondelai

SkillManage software complexity through deep modulesA Philosophy of Software Design Frameworkwondelai/skills · by wondelaiManage software complexity through deep modules, information hiding, and strategic programming. Use when the user mentions "module design", "API too complex", "shallow class", "complexity budget", "strategic vs tactical", "deep module", "information leakage", "pass-through method", "this code is over-engineered", or "simplify this design". Also trigger when reviewing an interface for simplicity, evaluating whether an abstraction is pulling its weight, deciding whether a comment is worth writing, or choosing between general-purpose and special-purpose approaches. Covers deep vs shallow modules, red flags for complexity, and comments as design documentation. For code quality, see clean-code. For architecture boundaries, see clean-architecture.★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillMetrics are the language of validated learningActionable metrics guidewondelai/skills · by wondelaiMetrics are the language of validated learning. The wrong metrics create the illusion of progress while the startup drifts toward failure.…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillAdvertising media is the vehicle that carries your messagewondelai/skills · by wondelaiAdvertising media is the vehicle that carries your message to your target market. Choosing the right media is not about what is trendy — it…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillAn affordance is a relationship between an objectAffordances: Designing for Actionwondelai/skills · by wondelaiAn affordance is a relationship between an object and a person that determines how the object could possibly be used. A chair affords…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillLean UX was designed to work inside Agile development teamsAgile integration for lean UXwondelai/skills · by wondelaiLean UX was designed to work inside Agile development teams, not alongside them. The central mechanism is dual-track agile, where a…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillThis reference translates the AMP framework from theoryAMP Applied: Practical Applications of Autonomy, Mastery, and Purposewondelai/skills · by wondelaiThis reference translates the AMP framework from theory into practice across six domains: product gamification, team management,…★ 2.2k GitHub stars