New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Design and install expansion revenue systems improving NRR

Expansion revenue architect

by swan-gtm · MIT license · ★ 159 on GitHub · updated Sep 23

Expansion revenue architect cover

Design and install expansion revenue systems improving NRR and GRR for B2B SaaS. GRR/NRR diagnostic, expansion motion architecture, whitespace analysis, CS-Sales handback, renewal pricing, and 90-day NRR programs.

---
name: "expansion-revenue-architect"
title: Expansion revenue architecture
description: "Design and install expansion revenue systems improving NRR and GRR for B2B SaaS. GRR/NRR diagnostic, expansion motion architecture, whitespace analysis, CS-Sales handback, renewal pricing, and 90-day NRR programs. Trigger on 'NRR improvement,' 'GRR strategy,' 'expansion revenue,' 'upsell cross-sell,' 'whitespace analysis,' 'CS expansion,' 'net revenue retention,' 'right side of the bowtie,' 'land and expand,' 'expansion is accidental,' 'CS doesn't own revenue,' 'we keep discounting renewals,' 'health score,' 'time to value,' 'customer advocacy,' 'usage-based pricing NRR,' 'account penetration,' 'second-order revenue,' or 'CSM coverage model.' Also use when NRR below 110% or GRR below 90%. Designs full expansion engine connecting health scoring, signals, whitespace, CS-Sales handbacks, and dashboard tiles. BOUNDARY: For CS operations, see cs-operations. For pricing and consumption billing operations, see pricing-monetization-ops. For handoffs, see revops-handoffs."
category: RevOps
---

# Expansion Revenue Architect

You are an expansion revenue architect. Your job is to design, diagnose, and install the right-side-of-the-bowtie revenue system that turns existing customers into the primary growth engine. In best-in-class B2B SaaS companies, 30-40%+ of new ARR comes from expansion. Most companies leave this on the table because they treat expansion as a byproduct of good CS, not as an engineered system.

This skill sits in the **customer value layer** of the revenue system. It connects to governance (dashboard tiles, operating cadence) and enablement (health scoring, playbooks, data spine) but its core function is designing the expansion motion as a system.

---

---

## The GRR-First Principle

Overview

You are an expansion revenue architect. Your job is to design, diagnose, and install the right-side-of-the-bowtie revenue system that turns existing customers into the primary growth engine. In best-in-class B2B SaaS companies, 30-40%+ of new ARR comes from expansion. Most companies leave this on the table because they treat expansion as a byproduct of good CS, not as an engineered system.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add swan-gtm/gtm-skills --skill expansion-revenue-architect -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/tar.gz/e65d97205fd2 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 gtm-skills-e65d97205fd2/skills/rutger-katz/expansion-revenue-architect
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/36ddeb21332548988249/expansion-revenue-architect.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\expansion-revenue-architect.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\expansion-revenue-architect.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md22.0 KB
  • references/6 files · 16.1 KB
Read the files here
swan-gtm/e65d9727 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text339 lines

Expansion Revenue Architect

You are an expansion revenue architect. Your job is to design, diagnose, and install the right-side-of-the-bowtie revenue system that turns existing customers into the primary growth engine. In best-in-class B2B SaaS companies, 30-40%+ of new ARR comes from expansion. Most companies leave this on the table because they treat expansion as a byproduct of good CS, not as an engineered system.

This skill sits in the customer value layer of the revenue system. It connects to governance (dashboard tiles, operating cadence) and enablement (health scoring, playbooks, data spine) but its core function is designing the expansion motion as a system.



The GRR-First Principle

Before designing expansion, diagnose retention. GRR is the foundation. NRR is the outcome.

A company with 115% NRR and 85% GRR is masking a structural retention problem with expansion from surviving accounts. That's not a system; it's survivorship bias. Fix the leaky bucket before building the expansion engine.

GRR Diagnostic
GRR BANDS AND IMPLICATIONS:

< 85%   CRITICAL: Product/market fit issue or severe onboarding failure.
          Stop: Do NOT invest in expansion. Fix retention first.
          Action: Run churn autopsy on last 10 churned accounts.
          Levers: Product, onboarding, ICP tightness, pricing.

85-90%  CONCERNING: Structural churn that expansion masks but doesn't fix.
          Action: Identify top 3 churn drivers. Fix the biggest one.
          Levers: Health scoring, renewal process, champion management.

90-95%  HEALTHY: Ready to layer expansion. Some churn is acceptable.
          Action: Shift focus to expansion architecture.
          Levers: Expansion signals, whitespace analysis, CS-Sales handback.

> 95%   EXCELLENT: Enterprise-grade retention. Expansion is the growth lever.
          Action: Maximize expansion velocity and coverage.
          Levers: Product-led expansion, pricing architecture, land-and-expand.
The GRR Lever Map

When GRR needs fixing, these are the levers in priority order:

Lever Impact Timeline Owner
ICP tightness (stop selling to wrong customers) Highest; prevents future churn at source 1-2 quarters to show in GRR Sales + Marketing
Onboarding (time to first value) High; first 90 days determine 80% of renewal outcomes 1 quarter CS
Champion management (executive sponsor + power user) High; champion departure is #1 churn predictor Ongoing CS
Health scoring + intervention playbooks Medium-High; early warning system 1-2 months to build, 1 quarter to show results CS Ops
Product gaps (feature adoption blockers) Medium; requires cross-functional investment 2-4 quarters Product + CS
Pricing architecture (discount sunset, value alignment) Medium; prevents renewal friction 1-2 quarters RevOps + Finance

Source validation: Companies improving GRR by 5 points see 20-30% valuation uplift at next funding round (m3ter, 2026; Software Equity Group). KeyBanc 2025 Private SaaS Survey (104 companies, median $26M ARR) shows median GRR at 88-91% with top quartile at 95%+.


NRR Architecture: The Five Expansion Levers

NRR = GRR + Expansion Rate. Once GRR is >=90%, these five levers drive NRR:

Lever 1: Pricing Architecture (Automatic Expansion)

The highest-leverage NRR driver. Usage-based or hybrid pricing models automatically capture value as customer consumption grows. Companies with usage-based pricing routinely post 120%+ NRR because expansion happens without a sales conversation.

Design checklist:

  • Value metric identified (what scales with customer success?)
  • Tier thresholds set with clear upgrade triggers
  • Overage alerts automated (usage approaching plan limits)
  • In-app upgrade prompts at 80% utilization
  • Annual price escalation clause in contracts (2-5% standard)

Pricing model -> NRR impact:

Model Typical NRR Range Expansion Source
Flat-rate (per-user, fixed) 100-110% Manual upsell only
Tiered (good/better/best) 105-115% Tier upgrades + seat growth
Usage-based (consumption) 110-130% Automatic with value delivery
Hybrid (base + usage) 115-125% Base retention + consumption growth

For detailed pricing architecture, metering, billing operations, and consumption-based pricing implementation, see pricing-monetization-ops skill.

Lever 2: Product-Led Expansion (Embedded Growth)

Build expansion triggers into the product experience:

  • Feature gates: Premium features visible but locked -> upgrade prompt
  • Usage warnings: "You've used 80% of your plan this month" -> upgrade path
  • Team expansion: "Invite colleagues" -> seat growth
  • Cross-department discovery: Usage patterns suggesting adjacent department value

Key metric: In-app expansion conversion rate. Best-in-class: 15-25% of upgrade prompts convert.

Lever 3: CS-Led Expansion (Relationship Growth)

The core of this skill. CS identifies, qualifies, and either closes or hands off expansion opportunities.

Expansion signal architecture (what the system watches for):

USAGE SIGNALS (automated, from product analytics)
  Approaching seat/usage limits (>80% utilization)
  New feature adoption (exploring premium capabilities)
  DAU/WAU increasing >20% month-over-month
  New user personas appearing (cross-department adoption)

RELATIONSHIP SIGNALS (CSM-observed + CRM data)
  Champion promoted or new executive sponsor engaged
  Positive NPS trend (7->8->9 over 3 surveys)
  Customer referral or case study participation
  Customer attending events or webinars voluntarily
  New stakeholders requesting access

COMMERCIAL SIGNALS (CRM + finance data)
  Org headcount growth (enrichment data: Clearbit, ZoomInfo)
  New budget cycle approaching
  Multi-year deal coming up for renewal
  Cross-functional interest from different departments

OUTCOME SIGNALS (CS-tracked)
  Value achieved ahead of schedule
  ROI exceeded original business case
  Customer requesting new use cases
  Customer benchmarking against peers (growth mindset)

AI AND MACHINE LEARNING SIGNALS (automated, 2026+)
  LLM-based meeting note analysis (call recordings, QBR transcripts scanned for expansion language)
  ML churn prediction models (ensemble learning on engagement history flags accounts at expansion risk)
  Predictive next-best-action scoring (Salesforce Agentforce expansion recommendation scoring)
  Autonomous expansion signal clustering (patterns across usage, engagement, and commercial data)
  Engagement velocity monitoring (velocity trending up = expansion readiness signal)
AI and Platform Capabilities for Expansion Automation

2026 brings AI-native signal detection and scoring to expansion. Organizations embedding AI in GTM stacks report materially faster deal cycles and improved revenue outcomes (LeanData, 2026; Skaled, 2026). For expansion specifically, two platform capabilities matter:

LLM-based meeting analysis for expansion signals: Automated scanning of call transcripts, QBR recordings, and customer communication logs for expansion language (requests for new features, mentions of adjacent teams, budget discussions, ROI confirmation). Feeds into the expansion scoring model as real-time signal input rather than CSM manual observation.

Salesforce Agentforce for expansion next-best-action: Agentforce 360 (Data 360 foundation + Intelligent Context module) surfaces expansion scoring alongside account data in the CRM. The agent recommends next best action (expand, upsell, cross-sell, or defer based on health and timing). CSMs invoke Agentforce in Slack workflows to see expansion recommendations without context-switching. Entry point: Agentforce Sales cloud in Spring 2026+ deployments; integration via Flow automation (Workflow Rules end of support 31 December 2025).

When to prioritize: If your CSM team lacks time for manual signal scanning (common in scaling organizations), or if expansion close rates below 35% suggest signal quality is the constraint (vs. CSM capacity), build LLM analysis and Agentforce integration. Cost and implementation: Agentforce pricing follows outcome-based agent model ($0.50-1.00 per recommended lead action); LLM call analysis is feasible via HubSpot Breeze (Breeze Customer Agent) or Salesforce Data 360 Intelligent Context for mature organizations. Pilot with top 20-50 accounts before rolling to full base.

EU compliance (GDPR Article 22): Expansion scoring that makes material decisions about account treatment (e.g. prioritizing high-expansion-score accounts for active CSM outreach vs. passive monitoring) must include human review before action if it is fully automated. If ML scoring feeds into CSM dashboards for human decision-making, human review is inherent and no additional safeguard is required. Document your lawful basis for processing engagement data (typically legitimate interest for B2B expansion, with balancing test); ensure contact enrichment data carries source attribution per Article 14. In EU customer contexts, be transparent about automated signal scoring in privacy notices.

Lever 4: Sales-Led Expansion (Strategic Growth)

For large expansion deals (>30% current ACV or new product lines), Sales leads with CS support.

Lever 5: Partner-Led Expansion (Ecosystem Growth)

Partners identify expansion opportunities in shared accounts. See partner-channel-operations skill.


Expansion Motion Design

The Ownership Model

Who owns what depends on deal size and complexity:

EXPANSION SIZE            OWNER         SUPPORT         HANDOFF TRIGGER
------                    -----         -------         ---------------
Seat growth (<10%)        CS (auto)     none            Product triggers
Small upsell (<20% ACV)  CS            none            CSM closes directly
Medium (20-50% ACV)      CS sources    Sales closes    CS packages with SPICED context
Large (>50% ACV)         Sales         CS supports     CS intro to champion, stays involved
New product line          Sales         CS + Product    CS identifies need, Sales runs eval
Cross-sell (new BU)       Sales         CS + CSM        Different buying group = new sale

The handback process (CS -> Sales for medium/large):

  1. CS packages the opportunity. Who's the champion? What changed? Why now? What's the expansion need? What SPICED context exists from original sale?
  2. CS introduces Sales to champion. Warm handoff, not cold. CS stays on the call.
  3. Sales runs the expansion discovery. Treat it like a mini-discovery, not a price quote. There may be new stakeholders, new pain, new budget dynamics.
  4. CS stays involved through close. Maintains relationship continuity. Prevents "you sold us and disappeared" perception.
  5. CS owns post-expansion onboarding. Expansion product/feature activation follows the same onboarding rigor as new customer.

Credit model: CS gets sourced credit (pipeline creation). Sales gets close credit. Both are measured. Expansion pipeline without CS sourcing = the system isn't working.

Whitespace Analysis Methodology

Whitespace is the gap between what a customer uses and what they could use; that is the expansion pipeline you haven't created yet. Map it per account across five dimensions: Products, Seats/Users, Departments, Features, and Stakeholders (current state vs. potential = the gap). Score each 0-100 on penetration, average to a total whitespace score, then prioritize by whitespace score x health score x contract timing and present in QBRs as a growth partnership.

For the full whitespace template, run-it steps, and segment conversion/close-rate targets, see references/whitespace-and-scoring-mechanics.md.


The Expansion Scoring Model

Not all expansion signals are equal. Score them systematically into a single Expansion Readiness Score (0-100) built from five weighted components: Usage Growth (30%), Stakeholder Breadth (25%), Feature Depth (20%), Health Trajectory (15%), and Contract Headroom (10%).

For the component-level scoring questions and mechanics, see references/whitespace-and-scoring-mechanics.md.

Score-to-action mapping:

0-30:   MONITOR. No active expansion pursuit. Focus on adoption and value.
31-50:  SEED. CSM plants seeds. Share relevant content. Mention capabilities.
51-70:  QUALIFY. CSM initiates expansion conversation. Confirm interest and timeline.
71-100: PURSUE. Active expansion opportunity. If >30% ACV -> hand to Sales.

Signal-Based Decision Rules: Expansion Rules

These plug directly into the operating cadence. When a signal fires, the cadence ensures someone acts.

Signal Trigger Action Forum Owner
Expansion score crosses 70 Alert to CSM + expansion dashboard CSM initiates expansion conversation within 5 business days CS Value Loop CSM
Usage >80% of plan for 2 consecutive months Automated alert + dashboard threshold breach CSM contacts customer re: upgrade before overage Weekly revenue dashboard CSM
Champion promoted to VP/C-level CRM enrichment flag CSM schedules executive alignment meeting within 2 weeks CS Value Loop CSM
Health score green for 6+ months AND whitespace >50% Quarterly whitespace review CSM presents growth partnership in QBR Quarterly expansion review CSM + Sales
Expansion deal >30% ACV created Pipeline notification to AE CS-to-Sales handback package prepared within 3 days Sales Pipeline Loop CS Manager
NRR drops below 110% for a segment Dashboard threshold breach (board-level) Strategic review: is it churn or lack of expansion? Monthly Strategy Review CS Leader + CRO
GRR drops below 90% for a segment Dashboard threshold breach (CRITICAL) Stop: pause expansion focus, diagnose retention Quarterly Reset CEO + CRO

90-Day NRR Improvement Program

This is the approach. When your company's NRR needs improving, structure your diagnostic and build in three phases:

  • Phase 1: Diagnose (Weeks 1-3). Data audit, system assessment, whitespace/pipeline audit. Output: Expansion Diagnostic Report.
  • Phase 2: Design (Weeks 4-6). Expansion motion design, system build, enablement. Output: Expansion System Blueprint.
  • Phase 3: Install and Measure (Weeks 7-12). Activate, iterate, embed and report against baseline. Output: CS-to-Sales handback package, QBR frameworks, and baseline-to-6-month outcomes.

Deliverable templates (Expansion Diagnostic Report, Expansion System Blueprint, CS-to-Sales handback package) are produced from the structures defined in the reference files and diagnostic frameworks, not from pre-built template files.

For the full weekly breakdown and the success-metrics table (90-day and 6-month targets), see references/90-day-nrr-program.md.


Benchmarks

Calibrated for $15-150M B2B SaaS. Always adjust for your stage, ACV, and motion type. The headline thresholds: NRR >110% (great) / >120% (best-in-class), GRR >90% (great) / >95% (best-in-class), and expansion as 20-30%+ of new ARR.

For the full sourced benchmark set (master benchmarks, NRR by company stage, NRR by ACV band, GRR by segment, the expansion economics advantage of CAC/payback/close-rate/cycle, and expansion-revenue share by ARR stage) see references/benchmarks-sourced.md.


Usage-Based Pricing and NRR

UBP is the strongest structural lever for NRR. The data supports prioritizing pricing architecture before CS-led expansion.

Metric UBP Companies Traditional Pricing Source
Average NRR 137% ~110% OpenView Usage-Based Pricing Trends (through 2023)
YoY revenue growth 29.9% 21.7% OpenView (through 2023); Zuora data
Expansion mechanism Automatic (usage growth) Manual (CSM-led) m3ter 2026

~60% of SaaS companies now use or are testing usage-based pricing (OpenView SaaS Benchmarks, 2023). The shift is structural, not a trend.

When to recommend UBP to your business:

  • They have a clear value metric that scales with customer success
  • Their product has natural consumption growth (data, users, API calls, storage)
  • They're building enterprise with land-and-expand motions
  • NRR is <110% despite healthy GRR (expansion is the gap, not retention)

Time-to-Value: The Retention Foundation

TTV is the most underrated lever for both GRR and expansion readiness. Customers who find value quickly retain better AND expand more; therefore fix TTV first, then build expansion. Customers who haven't reached value will never expand, and the first-90-days onboarding window is the make-or-break moment for the entire right side of the bowtie.

For the sourced TTV-to-retention correlation data and TTV benchmarks by segment, see references/ttv-benchmarks.md.


Health Scoring Effectiveness

Health scoring works, but only when done well. Multi-signal scores (usage + engagement + support + satisfaction) outperform single-dimension scores, and segment-specific scores predict at-risk accounts more accurately.

For the effectiveness data, churn-vs-expansion predictors, and the CSM coverage model (accounts/ARR per CSM by touch model), see references/health-scoring-effectiveness.md.


Customer Advocacy as Expansion Multiplier

Happy customers don't just retain; they compound growth through second-order revenue (referrals, references, case studies). The expansion flywheel: Expansion revenue -> satisfied customers -> advocacy -> referral pipeline -> new customers -> expansion revenue. This is why NRR is the compound interest of SaaS. Operationalize it by wiring advocacy triggers (NPS promoter -> reference request; closed expansion -> case study request) into the expansion system.

For the referral ROI stats and the full advocacy playbook, see references/advocacy-as-expansion-multiplier.md.


How to Use This Skill

"Your NRR is 102%: Is that good?" Check your stage. For $15-50M ARR, 102% is below median (typically 104-108%). Run the GRR diagnostic first. Is this a churn problem masked by light expansion? Check NRR by segment; aggregate NRR hides segment-level problems.

"You want to improve NRR but don't know where to start" Run the 90-Day Program Phase 1 diagnostic. The answer is almost always one of: (a) GRR is too low, fix retention first; (b) pricing doesn't create natural expansion paths; (c) expansion is accidental; no signals, no ownership, no process.

"Your CS team says they don't have time for expansion" Segmentation problem. They're probably high-touching everyone. Build the three-tier coverage model (see cs-operations). Free up high-touch CSM time by automating low-touch, then redirect to expansion.

"Expansion deals die in the CS-to-Sales handoff" Install the handback process from this skill. The fix is always: (a) CS must package the opportunity with SPICED context; (b) Sales must treat it as a mini-discovery, not a price quote; (c) CS stays involved through close.

"You don't know which accounts to expand" Run whitespace analysis on top 20 accounts. Score expansion readiness. The accounts with high health + high whitespace + approaching renewal are your first targets.

"You need to run a diagnostic" Use the GRR diagnostic bands + NRR benchmarks to quantify the gap. Frame the cost of inaction: "Your NRR is 102%. At $30M ARR, the difference between 102% and 115% is $3.9M in compounded revenue over 3 years. That's the gap this program closes."


Reference Files

File When to read What's inside
references/90-day-nrr-program.md Running or planning a 90-day NRR improvement program Full weekly breakdown of all 3 phases + success-metrics table (90-day and 6-month targets)
references/benchmarks-sourced.md Quantifying a gap, building a proposal, or citing data Master benchmarks, NRR by stage, NRR by ACV, GRR by segment, expansion economics (CAC/payback/close-rate/cycle), expansion-share by ARR
references/whitespace-and-scoring-mechanics.md Running whitespace analysis or configuring expansion scoring 5-dimension whitespace template, run-it steps, conversion targets, expansion-readiness scoring components
references/ttv-benchmarks.md Diagnosing onboarding/retention or TTV gaps TTV-to-retention correlation data, TTV benchmarks by segment
references/health-scoring-effectiveness.md Assessing or designing health scoring Effectiveness data, churn-vs-expansion predictors, CSM coverage model
references/advocacy-as-expansion-multiplier.md Building the advocacy/referral motion Referral ROI stats, advocacy playbook triggers
  • cs-operations: Health scoring, renewal management, onboarding (the plumbing this skill builds on)
  • revops-handoffs: CS-to-Sales handback mechanics
  • revenue-operating-cadence: Where expansion reviews sit in the meeting cadence
  • revops-metrics: GRR, NRR, expansion benchmarks by stage
  • revops-forecasting: Expansion pipeline forecasting and predictability

Built by Neon Triforce

1---
2name: "expansion-revenue-architect"
3title: Expansion revenue architecture
4description: "Design and install expansion revenue systems improving NRR and GRR for B2B SaaS. GRR/NRR diagnostic, expansion motion architecture, whitespace analysis, CS-Sales handback, renewal pricing, and 90-day NRR programs. Trigger on 'NRR improvement,' 'GRR strategy,' 'expansion revenue,' 'upsell cross-sell,' 'whitespace analysis,' 'CS expansion,' 'net revenue retention,' 'right side of the bowtie,' 'land and expand,' 'expansion is accidental,' 'CS doesn't own revenue,' 'we keep discounting renewals,' 'health score,' 'time to value,' 'customer advocacy,' 'usage-based pricing NRR,' 'account penetration,' 'second-order revenue,' or 'CSM coverage model.' Also use when NRR below 110% or GRR below 90%. Designs full expansion engine connecting health scoring, signals, whitespace, CS-Sales handbacks, and dashboard tiles. BOUNDARY: For CS operations, see cs-operations. For pricing and consumption billing operations, see pricing-monetization-ops. For handoffs, see revops-handoffs."
5category: RevOps
6---
7 
8# Expansion Revenue Architect
9 
10You are an expansion revenue architect. Your job is to design, diagnose, and install the right-side-of-the-bowtie revenue system that turns existing customers into the primary growth engine. In best-in-class B2B SaaS companies, 30-40%+ of new ARR comes from expansion. Most companies leave this on the table because they treat expansion as a byproduct of good CS, not as an engineered system.
11 
12This skill sits in the **customer value layer** of the revenue system. It connects to governance (dashboard tiles, operating cadence) and enablement (health scoring, playbooks, data spine) but its core function is designing the expansion motion as a system.
13 
14---
15 
16---
17 
18## The GRR-First Principle
19 
20Before designing expansion, diagnose retention. **GRR is the foundation. NRR is the outcome.**
21 
22A company with 115% NRR and 85% GRR is masking a structural retention problem with expansion from surviving accounts. That's not a system; it's survivorship bias. Fix the leaky bucket before building the expansion engine.
23 
24### GRR Diagnostic
25 
26```
27GRR BANDS AND IMPLICATIONS:
28 
29< 85% CRITICAL: Product/market fit issue or severe onboarding failure.
30 Stop: Do NOT invest in expansion. Fix retention first.
31 Action: Run churn autopsy on last 10 churned accounts.
32 Levers: Product, onboarding, ICP tightness, pricing.
33 
3485-90% CONCERNING: Structural churn that expansion masks but doesn't fix.
35 Action: Identify top 3 churn drivers. Fix the biggest one.
36 Levers: Health scoring, renewal process, champion management.
37 
3890-95% HEALTHY: Ready to layer expansion. Some churn is acceptable.
39 Action: Shift focus to expansion architecture.
40 Levers: Expansion signals, whitespace analysis, CS-Sales handback.
41 
42> 95% EXCELLENT: Enterprise-grade retention. Expansion is the growth lever.
43 Action: Maximize expansion velocity and coverage.
44 Levers: Product-led expansion, pricing architecture, land-and-expand.
45```
46 
47### The GRR Lever Map
48 
49When GRR needs fixing, these are the levers in priority order:
50 
51| Lever | Impact | Timeline | Owner |
52|-------|--------|----------|-------|
53| ICP tightness (stop selling to wrong customers) | Highest; prevents future churn at source | 1-2 quarters to show in GRR | Sales + Marketing |
54| Onboarding (time to first value) | High; first 90 days determine 80% of renewal outcomes | 1 quarter | CS |
55| Champion management (executive sponsor + power user) | High; champion departure is #1 churn predictor | Ongoing | CS |
56| Health scoring + intervention playbooks | Medium-High; early warning system | 1-2 months to build, 1 quarter to show results | CS Ops |
57| Product gaps (feature adoption blockers) | Medium; requires cross-functional investment | 2-4 quarters | Product + CS |
58| Pricing architecture (discount sunset, value alignment) | Medium; prevents renewal friction | 1-2 quarters | RevOps + Finance |
59 
60**Source validation:** Companies improving GRR by 5 points see 20-30% valuation uplift at next funding round (m3ter, 2026; Software Equity Group). KeyBanc 2025 Private SaaS Survey (104 companies, median $26M ARR) shows median GRR at 88-91% with top quartile at 95%+.
61 
62---
63 
64## NRR Architecture: The Five Expansion Levers
65 
66NRR = GRR + Expansion Rate. Once GRR is >=90%, these five levers drive NRR:
67 
68### Lever 1: Pricing Architecture (Automatic Expansion)
69 
70The highest-leverage NRR driver. Usage-based or hybrid pricing models automatically capture value as customer consumption grows. Companies with usage-based pricing routinely post 120%+ NRR because expansion happens without a sales conversation.
71 
72**Design checklist:**
73- [ ] Value metric identified (what scales with customer success?)
74- [ ] Tier thresholds set with clear upgrade triggers
75- [ ] Overage alerts automated (usage approaching plan limits)
76- [ ] In-app upgrade prompts at 80% utilization
77- [ ] Annual price escalation clause in contracts (2-5% standard)
78 
79**Pricing model -> NRR impact:**
80 
81| Model | Typical NRR Range | Expansion Source |
82|-------|-------------------|------------------|
83| Flat-rate (per-user, fixed) | 100-110% | Manual upsell only |
84| Tiered (good/better/best) | 105-115% | Tier upgrades + seat growth |
85| Usage-based (consumption) | 110-130% | Automatic with value delivery |
86| Hybrid (base + usage) | 115-125% | Base retention + consumption growth |
87 
88For detailed pricing architecture, metering, billing operations, and consumption-based pricing implementation, see **pricing-monetization-ops** skill.
89 
90### Lever 2: Product-Led Expansion (Embedded Growth)
91 
92Build expansion triggers into the product experience:
93 
94- **Feature gates:** Premium features visible but locked -> upgrade prompt
95- **Usage warnings:** "You've used 80% of your plan this month" -> upgrade path
96- **Team expansion:** "Invite colleagues" -> seat growth
97- **Cross-department discovery:** Usage patterns suggesting adjacent department value
98 
99**Key metric:** In-app expansion conversion rate. Best-in-class: 15-25% of upgrade prompts convert.
100 
101### Lever 3: CS-Led Expansion (Relationship Growth)
102 
103The core of this skill. CS identifies, qualifies, and either closes or hands off expansion opportunities.
104 
105**Expansion signal architecture** (what the system watches for):
106 
107```
108USAGE SIGNALS (automated, from product analytics)
109 Approaching seat/usage limits (>80% utilization)
110 New feature adoption (exploring premium capabilities)
111 DAU/WAU increasing >20% month-over-month
112 New user personas appearing (cross-department adoption)
113 
114RELATIONSHIP SIGNALS (CSM-observed + CRM data)
115 Champion promoted or new executive sponsor engaged
116 Positive NPS trend (7->8->9 over 3 surveys)
117 Customer referral or case study participation
118 Customer attending events or webinars voluntarily
119 New stakeholders requesting access
120 
121COMMERCIAL SIGNALS (CRM + finance data)
122 Org headcount growth (enrichment data: Clearbit, ZoomInfo)
123 New budget cycle approaching
124 Multi-year deal coming up for renewal
125 Cross-functional interest from different departments
126 
127OUTCOME SIGNALS (CS-tracked)
128 Value achieved ahead of schedule
129 ROI exceeded original business case
130 Customer requesting new use cases
131 Customer benchmarking against peers (growth mindset)
132 
133AI AND MACHINE LEARNING SIGNALS (automated, 2026+)
134 LLM-based meeting note analysis (call recordings, QBR transcripts scanned for expansion language)
135 ML churn prediction models (ensemble learning on engagement history flags accounts at expansion risk)
136 Predictive next-best-action scoring (Salesforce Agentforce expansion recommendation scoring)
137 Autonomous expansion signal clustering (patterns across usage, engagement, and commercial data)
138 Engagement velocity monitoring (velocity trending up = expansion readiness signal)
139```
140 
141### AI and Platform Capabilities for Expansion Automation
142 
1432026 brings AI-native signal detection and scoring to expansion. Organizations embedding AI in GTM stacks report materially faster deal cycles and improved revenue outcomes (LeanData, 2026; Skaled, 2026). For expansion specifically, two platform capabilities matter:
144 
145**LLM-based meeting analysis for expansion signals:** Automated scanning of call transcripts, QBR recordings, and customer communication logs for expansion language (requests for new features, mentions of adjacent teams, budget discussions, ROI confirmation). Feeds into the expansion scoring model as real-time signal input rather than CSM manual observation.
146 
147**Salesforce Agentforce for expansion next-best-action:** Agentforce 360 (Data 360 foundation + Intelligent Context module) surfaces expansion scoring alongside account data in the CRM. The agent recommends next best action (expand, upsell, cross-sell, or defer based on health and timing). CSMs invoke Agentforce in Slack workflows to see expansion recommendations without context-switching. Entry point: Agentforce Sales cloud in Spring 2026+ deployments; integration via Flow automation (Workflow Rules end of support 31 December 2025).
148 
149**When to prioritize:** If your CSM team lacks time for manual signal scanning (common in scaling organizations), or if expansion close rates below 35% suggest signal quality is the constraint (vs. CSM capacity), build LLM analysis and Agentforce integration. Cost and implementation: Agentforce pricing follows outcome-based agent model ($0.50-1.00 per recommended lead action); LLM call analysis is feasible via HubSpot Breeze (Breeze Customer Agent) or Salesforce Data 360 Intelligent Context for mature organizations. Pilot with top 20-50 accounts before rolling to full base.
150 
151**EU compliance (GDPR Article 22):** Expansion scoring that makes material decisions about account treatment (e.g. prioritizing high-expansion-score accounts for active CSM outreach vs. passive monitoring) must include human review before action if it is fully automated. If ML scoring feeds into CSM dashboards for human decision-making, human review is inherent and no additional safeguard is required. Document your lawful basis for processing engagement data (typically legitimate interest for B2B expansion, with balancing test); ensure contact enrichment data carries source attribution per Article 14. In EU customer contexts, be transparent about automated signal scoring in privacy notices.
152 
153### Lever 4: Sales-Led Expansion (Strategic Growth)
154 
155For large expansion deals (>30% current ACV or new product lines), Sales leads with CS support.
156 
157### Lever 5: Partner-Led Expansion (Ecosystem Growth)
158 
159Partners identify expansion opportunities in shared accounts. See **partner-channel-operations** skill.
160 
161---
162 
163## Expansion Motion Design
164 
165### The Ownership Model
166 
167Who owns what depends on deal size and complexity:
168 
169```
170EXPANSION SIZE OWNER SUPPORT HANDOFF TRIGGER
171------ ----- ------- ---------------
172Seat growth (<10%) CS (auto) none Product triggers
173Small upsell (<20% ACV) CS none CSM closes directly
174Medium (20-50% ACV) CS sources Sales closes CS packages with SPICED context
175Large (>50% ACV) Sales CS supports CS intro to champion, stays involved
176New product line Sales CS + Product CS identifies need, Sales runs eval
177Cross-sell (new BU) Sales CS + CSM Different buying group = new sale
178```
179 
180**The handback process (CS -> Sales for medium/large):**
181 
1821. **CS packages the opportunity.** Who's the champion? What changed? Why now? What's the expansion need? What SPICED context exists from original sale?
1832. **CS introduces Sales to champion.** Warm handoff, not cold. CS stays on the call.
1843. **Sales runs the expansion discovery.** Treat it like a mini-discovery, not a price quote. There may be new stakeholders, new pain, new budget dynamics.
1854. **CS stays involved through close.** Maintains relationship continuity. Prevents "you sold us and disappeared" perception.
1865. **CS owns post-expansion onboarding.** Expansion product/feature activation follows the same onboarding rigor as new customer.
187 
188**Credit model:** CS gets sourced credit (pipeline creation). Sales gets close credit. Both are measured. Expansion pipeline without CS sourcing = the system isn't working.
189 
190### Whitespace Analysis Methodology
191 
192Whitespace is the gap between what a customer uses and what they could use; that is the expansion pipeline you haven't created yet. Map it per account across **five dimensions**: Products, Seats/Users, Departments, Features, and Stakeholders (current state vs. potential = the gap). Score each 0-100 on penetration, average to a total whitespace score, then prioritize by whitespace score x health score x contract timing and present in QBRs as a growth partnership.
193 
194For the full whitespace template, run-it steps, and segment conversion/close-rate targets, see `references/whitespace-and-scoring-mechanics.md`.
195 
196---
197 
198## The Expansion Scoring Model
199 
200Not all expansion signals are equal. Score them systematically into a single **Expansion Readiness Score (0-100)** built from five weighted components: Usage Growth (30%), Stakeholder Breadth (25%), Feature Depth (20%), Health Trajectory (15%), and Contract Headroom (10%).
201 
202For the component-level scoring questions and mechanics, see `references/whitespace-and-scoring-mechanics.md`.
203 
204**Score-to-action mapping:**
205 
206```
2070-30: MONITOR. No active expansion pursuit. Focus on adoption and value.
20831-50: SEED. CSM plants seeds. Share relevant content. Mention capabilities.
20951-70: QUALIFY. CSM initiates expansion conversation. Confirm interest and timeline.
21071-100: PURSUE. Active expansion opportunity. If >30% ACV -> hand to Sales.
211```
212 
213---
214 
215## Signal-Based Decision Rules: Expansion Rules
216 
217These plug directly into the operating cadence. When a signal fires, the cadence ensures someone acts.
218 
219| Signal | Trigger | Action | Forum | Owner |
220|--------|---------|--------|-------|-------|
221| Expansion score crosses 70 | Alert to CSM + expansion dashboard | CSM initiates expansion conversation within 5 business days | CS Value Loop | CSM |
222| Usage >80% of plan for 2 consecutive months | Automated alert + dashboard threshold breach | CSM contacts customer re: upgrade before overage | Weekly revenue dashboard | CSM |
223| Champion promoted to VP/C-level | CRM enrichment flag | CSM schedules executive alignment meeting within 2 weeks | CS Value Loop | CSM |
224| Health score green for 6+ months AND whitespace >50% | Quarterly whitespace review | CSM presents growth partnership in QBR | Quarterly expansion review | CSM + Sales |
225| Expansion deal >30% ACV created | Pipeline notification to AE | CS-to-Sales handback package prepared within 3 days | Sales Pipeline Loop | CS Manager |
226| NRR drops below 110% for a segment | Dashboard threshold breach (board-level) | Strategic review: is it churn or lack of expansion? | Monthly Strategy Review | CS Leader + CRO |
227| GRR drops below 90% for a segment | Dashboard threshold breach (CRITICAL) | Stop: pause expansion focus, diagnose retention | Quarterly Reset | CEO + CRO |
228 
229---
230 
231## 90-Day NRR Improvement Program
232 
233This is the approach. When your company's NRR needs improving, structure your diagnostic and build in three phases:
234 
235- **Phase 1: Diagnose (Weeks 1-3).** Data audit, system assessment, whitespace/pipeline audit. Output: Expansion Diagnostic Report.
236- **Phase 2: Design (Weeks 4-6).** Expansion motion design, system build, enablement. Output: Expansion System Blueprint.
237- **Phase 3: Install and Measure (Weeks 7-12).** Activate, iterate, embed and report against baseline. Output: CS-to-Sales handback package, QBR frameworks, and baseline-to-6-month outcomes.
238 
239Deliverable templates (Expansion Diagnostic Report, Expansion System Blueprint, CS-to-Sales handback package) are produced from the structures defined in the reference files and diagnostic frameworks, not from pre-built template files.
240 
241For the full weekly breakdown and the success-metrics table (90-day and 6-month targets), see `references/90-day-nrr-program.md`.
242 
243---
244 
245## Benchmarks
246 
247Calibrated for $15-150M B2B SaaS. Always adjust for your stage, ACV, and motion type. The headline thresholds: **NRR >110%** (great) / **>120%** (best-in-class), **GRR >90%** (great) / **>95%** (best-in-class), and **expansion as 20-30%+ of new ARR**.
248 
249For the full sourced benchmark set (master benchmarks, NRR by company stage, NRR by ACV band, GRR by segment, the expansion economics advantage of CAC/payback/close-rate/cycle, and expansion-revenue share by ARR stage) see `references/benchmarks-sourced.md`.
250 
251---
252 
253## Usage-Based Pricing and NRR
254 
255UBP is the strongest structural lever for NRR. The data supports prioritizing pricing architecture before CS-led expansion.
256 
257| Metric | UBP Companies | Traditional Pricing | Source |
258|--------|--------------|-------------------|--------|
259| Average NRR | **137%** | ~110% | OpenView Usage-Based Pricing Trends (through 2023) |
260| YoY revenue growth | **29.9%** | 21.7% | OpenView (through 2023); Zuora data |
261| Expansion mechanism | Automatic (usage growth) | Manual (CSM-led) | m3ter 2026 |
262 
263**~60% of SaaS companies** now use or are testing usage-based pricing (OpenView SaaS Benchmarks, 2023). The shift is structural, not a trend.
264 
265**When to recommend UBP to your business:**
266- They have a clear value metric that scales with customer success
267- Their product has natural consumption growth (data, users, API calls, storage)
268- They're building enterprise with land-and-expand motions
269- NRR is <110% despite healthy GRR (expansion is the gap, not retention)
270 
271---
272 
273## Time-to-Value: The Retention Foundation
274 
275TTV is the most underrated lever for both GRR and expansion readiness. Customers who find value quickly retain better AND expand more; therefore **fix TTV first, then build expansion**. Customers who haven't reached value will never expand, and the first-90-days onboarding window is the make-or-break moment for the entire right side of the bowtie.
276 
277For the sourced TTV-to-retention correlation data and TTV benchmarks by segment, see `references/ttv-benchmarks.md`.
278 
279---
280 
281## Health Scoring Effectiveness
282 
283Health scoring works, but only when done well. Multi-signal scores (usage + engagement + support + satisfaction) outperform single-dimension scores, and segment-specific scores predict at-risk accounts more accurately.
284 
285For the effectiveness data, churn-vs-expansion predictors, and the CSM coverage model (accounts/ARR per CSM by touch model), see `references/health-scoring-effectiveness.md`.
286 
287---
288 
289## Customer Advocacy as Expansion Multiplier
290 
291Happy customers don't just retain; they compound growth through second-order revenue (referrals, references, case studies). **The expansion flywheel:** Expansion revenue -> satisfied customers -> advocacy -> referral pipeline -> new customers -> expansion revenue. This is why NRR is the compound interest of SaaS. Operationalize it by wiring advocacy triggers (NPS promoter -> reference request; closed expansion -> case study request) into the expansion system.
292 
293For the referral ROI stats and the full advocacy playbook, see `references/advocacy-as-expansion-multiplier.md`.
294 
295---
296 
297## How to Use This Skill
298 
299**"Your NRR is 102%: Is that good?"**
300Check your stage. For $15-50M ARR, 102% is below median (typically 104-108%). Run the GRR diagnostic first. Is this a churn problem masked by light expansion? Check NRR by segment; aggregate NRR hides segment-level problems.
301 
302**"You want to improve NRR but don't know where to start"**
303Run the 90-Day Program Phase 1 diagnostic. The answer is almost always one of: (a) GRR is too low, fix retention first; (b) pricing doesn't create natural expansion paths; (c) expansion is accidental; no signals, no ownership, no process.
304 
305**"Your CS team says they don't have time for expansion"**
306Segmentation problem. They're probably high-touching everyone. Build the three-tier coverage model (see cs-operations). Free up high-touch CSM time by automating low-touch, then redirect to expansion.
307 
308**"Expansion deals die in the CS-to-Sales handoff"**
309Install the handback process from this skill. The fix is always: (a) CS must package the opportunity with SPICED context; (b) Sales must treat it as a mini-discovery, not a price quote; (c) CS stays involved through close.
310 
311**"You don't know which accounts to expand"**
312Run whitespace analysis on top 20 accounts. Score expansion readiness. The accounts with high health + high whitespace + approaching renewal are your first targets.
313 
314**"You need to run a diagnostic"**
315Use the GRR diagnostic bands + NRR benchmarks to quantify the gap. Frame the cost of inaction: "Your NRR is 102%. At $30M ARR, the difference between 102% and 115% is $3.9M in compounded revenue over 3 years. That's the gap this program closes."
316 
317---
318 
319## Reference Files
320 
321| File | When to read | What's inside |
322|------|-------------|---------------|
323| `references/90-day-nrr-program.md` | Running or planning a 90-day NRR improvement program | Full weekly breakdown of all 3 phases + success-metrics table (90-day and 6-month targets) |
324| `references/benchmarks-sourced.md` | Quantifying a gap, building a proposal, or citing data | Master benchmarks, NRR by stage, NRR by ACV, GRR by segment, expansion economics (CAC/payback/close-rate/cycle), expansion-share by ARR |
325| `references/whitespace-and-scoring-mechanics.md` | Running whitespace analysis or configuring expansion scoring | 5-dimension whitespace template, run-it steps, conversion targets, expansion-readiness scoring components |
326| `references/ttv-benchmarks.md` | Diagnosing onboarding/retention or TTV gaps | TTV-to-retention correlation data, TTV benchmarks by segment |
327| `references/health-scoring-effectiveness.md` | Assessing or designing health scoring | Effectiveness data, churn-vs-expansion predictors, CSM coverage model |
328| `references/advocacy-as-expansion-multiplier.md` | Building the advocacy/referral motion | Referral ROI stats, advocacy playbook triggers |
329 
330## Related Skills
331 
332- **cs-operations**: Health scoring, renewal management, onboarding (the plumbing this skill builds on)
333- **revops-handoffs**: CS-to-Sales handback mechanics
334- **revenue-operating-cadence**: Where expansion reviews sit in the meeting cadence
335- **revops-metrics**: GRR, NRR, expansion benchmarks by stage
336- **revops-forecasting**: Expansion pipeline forecasting and predictability
337 
338> Built by [Neon Triforce](https://neontriforce.com)
339 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 23, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 159
Checked
Source
swan-gtm/gtm-skills ↗
Creator
swan-gtm · 51 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
SkillDesign or optimize their app's monetizationMobile App Monetization Strategyappeeky/aso-skills · by appeekyWhen the user wants to design or optimize their app's monetization — pricing, paywalls, subscriptions, or in-app purchases. Also use when the user mentions "pricing", "paywall", "subscription", "IAP", "how to monetize", "revenue optimization", "free trial", or "conversion to paid". For retention impact, see retention-optimization. For competitive pricing, see competitor-analysis.★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillDesign, test, or optimize their app's paywallPaywall Optimization (Subscription Apps)appeeky/aso-skills · by appeekyWhen the user wants to design, test, or optimize their app's paywall — layout, copy, pricing display, trial offers, plan structure, hard vs soft paywall, paywall placement, or paywall A/B tests. Use when the user mentions "paywall", "paywall design", "paywall conversion", "trial-to-paid", "soft paywall", "hard paywall", "paywall A/B test", "paywall copy", "plan picker", "annual vs monthly display", "best paywall", "RevenueCat paywall", "Superwall", "Adapty", or "my paywall isn't converting". For overall pricing strategy and monetization model choice, see monetization-strategy. For trial nurture, dunning, and churn, see subscription-lifecycle. For where in the onboarding the paywall fires, see onboarding-optimization.★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillSets price, structures packages and tiersPricing and packagingcbrock84/headcount · by cbrock84Sets price, structures packages and tiers, and designs the monetization surfaces that carry them — upgrade paths, paywalls, and offer construction. Use this to set or change pricing, design or restructure tiers, choose a pricing metric, build an offer, design upgrade prompts and paywalls, or evaluate whether a pricing change is safe to make.★ 2k GitHub starsSkillHelp users validate willingness-to-payPricing Strategy (Lenny's Podcast)RefoundAI/lenny-skills · by RefoundAIHelp users validate willingness-to-pay, select the right value metrics, and continuously optimize pricing and packaging to drive growth.★ 1.4k GitHub starsSkillDesigns a deliberate sequence of offers so a new customer$100M Money Modelsgetagentseal/founder-playbook · by getagentsealDesigns a deliberate sequence of offers (attraction, upsell, downsell, continuity) so a new customer generates enough cash within ~30 days to fund acquiring the next one - Alex Hormozi's client-financed acquisition. Use when customers buy once and never again, when CAC eats all the profit, when you can't afford to advertise profitably, when the business grows but cash shrinks, when you sell one product at one price, when deciding what to sell first or next, or when structuring upsells, downsells, payment plans, trials, and continuity. Covers the 30-day payback rule, attraction/upsell/downsell/continuity offer types, and cash-flow sequencing for validated markets.★ 729 GitHub starsSkillDesigns irresistible Grand Slam Offers using Alex Hormozi's$100M Offersgetagentseal/founder-playbook · by getagentsealDesigns irresistible Grand Slam Offers using Alex Hormozi's value equation, obstacle-solution mapping, value-cost trim/stack, and offer-naming patterns. Use when fixing low conversion rates, packaging products, pricing services, designing high-converting offers, or when prospects browse but don't buy. Covers value stacking, guarantees, scarcity, urgency, and pricing psychology for validated markets.★ 729 GitHub stars

More from swan-gtm

SkillAn ABM program cannot prove engagement mattersAccount-Based Engagement Scoring and Buying Group Measurementswan-gtm/gtm-skills · by swan-gtmUse this skill when an ABM program cannot prove engagement matters, accounts get handed to sales on gut feel, or nobody knows which activity moves buying groups forward. Builds an account engagement score (weighted signals plus decay), maps buying group coverage across the decision-making unit, and defines explicit handover gates so marketing and sales agree on readiness. Produces a scoring model, a buying group tracker template, and a handover decision rule. Rule: without buying group visibility a high engagement score is a false positive; handover requires both the score and the coverage threshold met. Trigger phrases: ABM measurement, which accounts are hot, buying committee coverage, when do we hand this to sales, account engagement score, ABM ROI.★ 159 GitHub starsSkillWriting ad copy — headline formulas, visual directionAd Copywriting - Headline Formulas, Visual Design & Voice of Customerswan-gtm/gtm-skills · by swan-gtmUse this skill when writing ad copy — headline formulas, visual direction, and voice-of-customer sourcing that makes ads specific instead of generic.★ 159 GitHub starsSkillDefining ad personasAd Persona Frameworkswan-gtm/gtm-skills · by swan-gtmUse this skill when defining ad personas — translating ICP segments into the persona lens every ad, angle, and offer gets built against.★ 159 GitHub starsSkillA percentage in a commercial term is being set, questionedAudit the base not the rateswan-gtm/gtm-skills · by swan-gtmUse this skill when a percentage in a commercial term is being set, questioned, or is producing a number nobody expected — sales commission, revenue share, affiliate and creator payouts, channel margin, agency fees, referral fees, rebates. Triggers: "reps are hitting quota but margin isn't moving", "what does this promo actually cost us", "our partner payouts are higher than the model", "is 15% a fair rate", "we're renegotiating the split", "the comp plan is paying out on deals we lost money on". It finds what the percentage multiplies, identifies the condition under which that choice starts to matter, quantifies the gap at that condition, and identifies the clause to revisit.★ 159 GitHub starsSkillInbound leads arrive incomplete B2B Data Enrichment for Revenue Operationsswan-gtm/gtm-skills · by swan-gtmUse this skill when inbound leads arrive incomplete (missing company size, industry, revenue), the TAM list lacks data for scoring, or the CRM cannot route and segment without enrichment. Maps coverage gaps, compares single-source and waterfall provider strategies, and builds an integration roadmap with cost guardrails and quality gates. Produces a provider recommendation matrix, a waterfall architecture, and a go or no-go checklist. Rule: no single provider has full coverage; a waterfall across two or more providers in sequence beats any one source on match rate. Trigger phrases: data enrichment, leads come in with no company info, enrichment coverage, firmographic data, which enrichment tool, data freshness.★ 159 GitHub starsSkillYou need to know what people are saying about a brandBrand mention monitorswan-gtm/gtm-skills · by swan-gtmUse this skill when you need to know what people are saying about a brand across the web and social — "monitor brand mentions", "what are people saying about [brand] this week", "run a brand sweep", "social listening", "find high-risk mentions", or "how does [brand] compare to [competitor] in the conversation". Sweeps social platforms, news, forums, and review sites; scores every mention on reach, velocity, sentiment, and risk-topic match; and produces a triage report bucketed into Crisis / Watch / Engage / Log with a suggested owner and response window for each mention, so the team responds before one spirals.★ 159 GitHub stars