Customer win back sequencer
For churned accounts, research what has changed since they left — new funding, team growth, competitor dissatisfaction, product updates that address their pain — then assess re-engagement potential and generate a personalized win-back email sequence with timing recommendations.
How to use it
- Hit Copy the whole skill.
- Claude: ⋯ → Download .md, then Customize → Skills → Add → Upload skill.
ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat. - Describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
npx degit gooseworks-ai/goose-skills/skills/outreach/composites/customer-win-back-sequencer#main ~/.claude/skills/customer-win-back-sequencerFor one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/customer-win-back-sequencer.
Not working?
- Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
- Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.
Show the full text354 lines
Customer Win-Back Sequencer
Not every churned customer is gone forever. This skill identifies which ones to pursue, finds the right re-engagement angle, and generates a personalized win-back sequence. Timing and relevance are everything — no generic "we miss you" emails.
Built for: Startups that have churned customers sitting in a spreadsheet with no plan to re-engage them. The best win-back campaigns are triggered by change — this skill monitors for those changes and strikes when the timing is right.
When to Use
- "Which churned customers should we try to win back?"
- "Build a win-back campaign for [customer]"
- "Research our churned accounts for re-engagement opportunities"
- "Generate win-back emails for customers who left because of [reason]"
- "Run the win-back scan on our churn list"
Phase 0: Intake
Churned Account Data
- Churn list — CSV/sheet with: company name, domain, contact email, contact LinkedIn URL (if available), churn date, MRR at churn, churn reason (if known)
- Time since churn filter — Min/max months since churn to consider (default: 3-18 months. Too recent = too soon. Too old = too stale.)
- Minimum value — Only pursue accounts above $X MRR? (Focus effort on worthwhile wins)
Product Context
- Major product updates since churn — What's new? (Features, pricing changes, integrations, performance improvements)
- Churn reasons addressed — Which past churn reasons have you actually fixed?
- Current offer — Any win-back incentive? (Discount, extended trial, concierge onboarding, free migration)
Sequence Preferences
- Sender — Who should the emails come from? (Founder, CSM, account exec)
- Channel — Email only, or email + LinkedIn?
- Sequence length — How many touches? (Default: 3-4 over 3-4 weeks)
Phase 1: Churned Account Research
For each account in the churn list, research what's changed:
1A: Company Changes
Search: "[company name]" funding OR raised OR "series" OR acquisition 2025 2026
Search: "[company name]" hiring OR "we're hiring" OR "growing team"
Search: "[company name]" launch OR "new product" OR expansion OR pivot
Extract:
- Funding: New round raised? (More budget available)
- Growth: Headcount increasing? New hires in relevant roles?
- Product changes: Launched something new that would benefit from your product?
- Market moves: Entered a new market, new partnerships?
1B: Contact Changes
Search: "[contact name]" "[company name]" OR linkedin.com
Search: "[company name]" "[relevant title]" new OR hired OR promoted
Determine:
- Same contact still there? If yes, continuity helps. If no, find the new person.
- Contact promoted? More authority = bigger potential deal.
- New decision-maker? Fresh eyes, no baggage from the old experience.
1C: Competitor Dissatisfaction Signals
If you know which competitor they switched to:
Search: "[competitor name]" complaints OR issues OR "looking for alternative"
Search: "[competitor name]" site:g2.com negative reviews
Search: "[company name]" "[competitor name]" OR "switched from"
Look for:
- Public complaints about the competitor they switched to
- Reviews mentioning problems that your product solves
- Signs of "buyer's remorse" in the market
1D: Product-Churn Fit Analysis
Match what's changed in your product against their churn reason:
| Churn Reason | Product Update | Win-Back Angle |
|---|---|---|
| "Too expensive" | New pricing tier / startup discount | Price-based re-engagement |
| "Missing [feature]" | [Feature] shipped | Feature announcement |
| "Too complex" | Simplified onboarding / UX overhaul | "We listened" narrative |
| "Switched to [competitor]" | Competitive advantage developed | Competitive displacement |
| "Didn't see ROI" | New ROI dashboard / case studies | Proof-based approach |
| "Champion left" | N/A — find new champion | Fresh start narrative |
| "Company downsized" | Company now growing again (from research) | Timing-based re-engagement |
Phase 2: Win-Back Scoring
Score each churned account's re-engagement potential:
Win-Back Score = (Change Signal × Churn Reason Addressability × Account Value) / Time Decay
Change Signal (1-5):
5 = Multiple strong signals (funding + growth + competitor issues)
4 = One strong signal (funding or significant growth)
3 = Moderate signal (hiring, product launch)
2 = Minor signal (still operating, no major changes)
1 = No detectable change
Churn Reason Addressability (1-3):
3 = You've directly fixed the reason they left
2 = Partially addressed or different angle available
1 = Same issues exist / unknown churn reason
Account Value (multiplier):
2.0x = Was top 20% by MRR
1.5x = Mid-tier MRR
1.0x = Lower MRR
Time Decay (divisor):
1.0 = Churned 3-6 months ago (sweet spot)
1.2 = Churned 6-12 months ago
1.5 = Churned 12-18 months ago
2.0 = Churned 18+ months ago
Priority Tiers
| Tier | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|
| High Priority | 8+ | Full personalized sequence + founder outreach |
| Medium Priority | 4-7 | Personalized sequence |
| Low Priority | 1-3 | Batch campaign or skip |
Phase 3: Sequence Generation
Win-Back Sequence — High Priority (4 emails over 4 weeks)
Email 1: The Relevant Update (Day 0)
Subject options:
A: "[First name], [specific thing] changed since we last spoke"
B: "We fixed the thing that made you leave"
C: "[Company] + [Your Product] — worth another look?"
---
Hi [First name],
[1 sentence acknowledging they left — no guilt, no desperation]
Since then, we've [specific improvement that addresses their churn reason]:
- [Change 1 — most relevant to their pain]
- [Change 2]
- [Change 3]
[If you have a relevant customer proof point]:
"[Company in their space] switched back and saw [result]."
Would it be worth a 15-minute look at what's different?
[Soft CTA — no pressure]
[Signature]
Email 2: The Proof Point (Day 7)
Subject: "How [similar company] is using [product] now"
Hi [First name],
Quick follow-up — wanted to share something relevant.
[Case study or proof point from a company similar to theirs]:
- [What they achieved]
- [Metric that matters]
[1 sentence connecting this to their specific situation]
[CTA — slightly stronger: "Want me to show you the new [feature] in 10 minutes?"]
[Signature]
Email 3: The Offer (Day 14)
Subject: "[Specific offer — e.g., 'Free migration + 30 days on us']"
Hi [First name],
I know switching tools is a pain — that's usually what keeps people from
coming back even when the product has improved.
So we're making it easy:
- [Offer detail 1 — e.g., "We'll handle the full migration"]
- [Offer detail 2 — e.g., "30 days free to test everything"]
- [Offer detail 3 — e.g., "Dedicated onboarding session"]
[If applicable: "This offer is available through [date]"]
Worth a conversation?
[Signature]
Email 4: The Breakup (Day 28)
Subject: "Closing the loop"
Hi [First name],
Totally understand if the timing isn't right — just wanted to
make sure this didn't slip through the cracks.
Quick summary of what's new:
→ [Key improvement 1]
→ [Key improvement 2]
→ [Standing offer, if applicable]
If anything changes on your end, my inbox is always open.
[Signature]
P.S. [Genuinely helpful resource — e.g., "We just published [relevant content].
Worth a read regardless of which tool you're using."]
Win-Back Sequence — Medium Priority (3 emails over 3 weeks)
Shorter, less personalized but still relevant:
Email 1: Product update announcement + relevance to their use case Email 2: Customer proof point + specific offer Email 3: Soft breakup with resource share
Win-Back Sequence — Competitor-Specific
If they switched to a known competitor:
Email 1: "How [product] compares to [competitor] today" — honest, non-aggressive comparison focused on what changed Email 2: Customer story of someone who switched back from that specific competitor Email 3: Offer + easy migration path
Phase 4: Output Format
# Win-Back Opportunity Report — [DATE]
Churned accounts analyzed: [N]
Time window: [Churned between X and Y months ago]
---
## Summary
| Priority | Accounts | Total MRR Opportunity |
|----------|----------|----------------------|
| High Priority | [N] | $[X]/mo |
| Medium Priority | [N] | $[X]/mo |
| Low Priority / Skip | [N] | $[X]/mo |
**Total recoverable MRR:** $[X]/mo (estimated, assuming [Y%] win-back rate)
---
## High Priority Accounts
### [Company 1] — Churned: [date] | Former MRR: $[X]
**Churn reason:** [Reason]
**What's changed (them):** [Research findings]
**What's changed (us):** [Product updates that address their pain]
**Win-back angle:** [The core pitch]
**Contact:** [Name, title, email]
**Sequence:** [Attached — 4 emails, personalized]
### [Company 2] — ...
---
## Medium Priority Accounts
| Account | Churned | MRR | Churn Reason | Win-Back Angle | Score |
|---------|---------|-----|-------------|---------------|-------|
| [Name] | [Date] | $[X] | [Reason] | [Angle] | [N] |
---
## Email Sequences
### [Company 1] — Full Personalized Sequence
[Email 1: Subject + body]
[Email 2: Subject + body]
[Email 3: Subject + body]
[Email 4: Subject + body]
### [Company 2] — ...
---
## Accounts to Skip (and Why)
| Account | Reason to Skip |
|---------|---------------|
| [Name] | [Still in same situation / company shut down / too recent] |
---
## Win-Back Campaign Setup
If using Smartlead:
- Campaign name: "Win-Back — [Month] [Year]"
- Sequences: [Use generated sequences above]
- Timing: [Recommended send schedule]
- Sender: [Recommended — founder for high priority, CSM for medium]
Save to clients/<client-name>/customer-success/win-back/win-back-report-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.
Cost
| Component | Cost |
|---|---|
| Web research per churned account | Free |
| LinkedIn research (optional) | ~$0.25-0.50 per account |
| Sequence generation | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Total | Free — $5 (for ~10 accounts with LinkedIn research) |
Tools Required
- web_search — for company and competitor research
- fetch_webpage — for career pages, news, competitor reviews
- Optional:
linkedin-profile-post-scraperfor contact monitoring - Optional:
review-site-scraperfor competitor dissatisfaction signals - Optional:
cold-email-outreachfor campaign creation
Trigger Phrases
- "Which churned customers should we win back?"
- "Build a win-back sequence for [customer]"
- "Research our churn list for re-engagement"
- "Run the win-back scan"
- "Generate win-back emails for churned accounts"
| 1 | |
| 2 | name customer-win-back-sequencer |
| 3 | description > |
| 4 | For churned accounts, research what has changed since they left — new funding, team |
| 5 | growth, competitor dissatisfaction, product updates that address their pain — then |
| 6 | assess re-engagement potential and generate a personalized win-back email sequence |
| 7 | with timing recommendations. Chains web research and LinkedIn monitoring with email |
| 8 | sequence generation. |
| 9 | tags [outreach] |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | # Customer Win-Back Sequencer |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Not every churned customer is gone forever. This skill identifies which ones to pursue, finds the right re-engagement angle, and generates a personalized win-back sequence. Timing and relevance are everything — no generic "we miss you" emails. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | **Built for:** Startups that have churned customers sitting in a spreadsheet with no plan to re-engage them. The best win-back campaigns are triggered by change — this skill monitors for those changes and strikes when the timing is right. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## When to Use |
| 19 | |
| 20 | "Which churned customers should we try to win back?" |
| 21 | "Build a win-back campaign for [customer]" |
| 22 | "Research our churned accounts for re-engagement opportunities" |
| 23 | "Generate win-back emails for customers who left because of [reason]" |
| 24 | "Run the win-back scan on our churn list" |
| 25 | |
| 26 | ## Phase 0: Intake |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ### Churned Account Data |
| 29 | **Churn list** — CSV/sheet with: company name, domain, contact email, contact LinkedIn URL (if available), churn date, MRR at churn, churn reason (if known) |
| 30 | **Time since churn filter** — Min/max months since churn to consider (default: 3-18 months. Too recent = too soon. Too old = too stale.) |
| 31 | **Minimum value** — Only pursue accounts above $X MRR? (Focus effort on worthwhile wins) |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ### Product Context |
| 34 | **Major product updates since churn** — What's new? (Features, pricing changes, integrations, performance improvements) |
| 35 | **Churn reasons addressed** — Which past churn reasons have you actually fixed? |
| 36 | **Current offer** — Any win-back incentive? (Discount, extended trial, concierge onboarding, free migration) |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ### Sequence Preferences |
| 39 | **Sender** — Who should the emails come from? (Founder, CSM, account exec) |
| 40 | **Channel** — Email only, or email + LinkedIn? |
| 41 | **Sequence length** — How many touches? (Default: 3-4 over 3-4 weeks) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | ## Phase 1: Churned Account Research |
| 44 | |
| 45 | For each account in the churn list, research what's changed: |
| 46 | |
| 47 | ### 1A: Company Changes |
| 48 | |
| 49 | |
| 50 | Search: "[company name]" funding OR raised OR "series" OR acquisition 2025 2026 |
| 51 | Search: "[company name]" hiring OR "we're hiring" OR "growing team" |
| 52 | Search: "[company name]" launch OR "new product" OR expansion OR pivot |
| 53 | |
| 54 | |
| 55 | Extract: |
| 56 | **Funding:** New round raised? (More budget available) |
| 57 | **Growth:** Headcount increasing? New hires in relevant roles? |
| 58 | **Product changes:** Launched something new that would benefit from your product? |
| 59 | **Market moves:** Entered a new market, new partnerships? |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ### 1B: Contact Changes |
| 62 | |
| 63 | |
| 64 | Search: "[contact name]" "[company name]" OR linkedin.com |
| 65 | Search: "[company name]" "[relevant title]" new OR hired OR promoted |
| 66 | |
| 67 | |
| 68 | Determine: |
| 69 | **Same contact still there?** If yes, continuity helps. If no, find the new person. |
| 70 | **Contact promoted?** More authority = bigger potential deal. |
| 71 | **New decision-maker?** Fresh eyes, no baggage from the old experience. |
| 72 | |
| 73 | ### 1C: Competitor Dissatisfaction Signals |
| 74 | |
| 75 | If you know which competitor they switched to: |
| 76 | |
| 77 | |
| 78 | Search: "[competitor name]" complaints OR issues OR "looking for alternative" |
| 79 | Search: "[competitor name]" site:g2.com negative reviews |
| 80 | Search: "[company name]" "[competitor name]" OR "switched from" |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 83 | Look for: |
| 84 | Public complaints about the competitor they switched to |
| 85 | Reviews mentioning problems that your product solves |
| 86 | Signs of "buyer's remorse" in the market |
| 87 | |
| 88 | ### 1D: Product-Churn Fit Analysis |
| 89 | |
| 90 | Match what's changed in your product against their churn reason: |
| 91 | |
| 92 | | Churn Reason | Product Update | Win-Back Angle | |
| 93 | |-------------|----------------|----------------| |
| 94 | | "Too expensive" | New pricing tier / startup discount | Price-based re-engagement | |
| 95 | | "Missing [feature]" | [Feature] shipped | Feature announcement | |
| 96 | | "Too complex" | Simplified onboarding / UX overhaul | "We listened" narrative | |
| 97 | | "Switched to [competitor]" | Competitive advantage developed | Competitive displacement | |
| 98 | | "Didn't see ROI" | New ROI dashboard / case studies | Proof-based approach | |
| 99 | | "Champion left" | N/A — find new champion | Fresh start narrative | |
| 100 | | "Company downsized" | Company now growing again (from research) | Timing-based re-engagement | |
| 101 | |
| 102 | ## Phase 2: Win-Back Scoring |
| 103 | |
| 104 | Score each churned account's re-engagement potential: |
| 105 | |
| 106 | |
| 107 | Win-Back Score = (Change Signal × Churn Reason Addressability × Account Value) / Time Decay |
| 108 | |
| 109 | Change Signal (1-5): |
| 110 | 5 = Multiple strong signals (funding + growth + competitor issues) |
| 111 | 4 = One strong signal (funding or significant growth) |
| 112 | 3 = Moderate signal (hiring, product launch) |
| 113 | 2 = Minor signal (still operating, no major changes) |
| 114 | 1 = No detectable change |
| 115 | |
| 116 | Churn Reason Addressability (1-3): |
| 117 | 3 = You've directly fixed the reason they left |
| 118 | 2 = Partially addressed or different angle available |
| 119 | 1 = Same issues exist / unknown churn reason |
| 120 | |
| 121 | Account Value (multiplier): |
| 122 | 2.0x = Was top 20% by MRR |
| 123 | 1.5x = Mid-tier MRR |
| 124 | 1.0x = Lower MRR |
| 125 | |
| 126 | Time Decay (divisor): |
| 127 | 1.0 = Churned 3-6 months ago (sweet spot) |
| 128 | 1.2 = Churned 6-12 months ago |
| 129 | 1.5 = Churned 12-18 months ago |
| 130 | 2.0 = Churned 18+ months ago |
| 131 | |
| 132 | |
| 133 | ### Priority Tiers |
| 134 | |
| 135 | | Tier | Score | Action | |
| 136 | |------|-------|--------| |
| 137 | | **High Priority** | 8+ | Full personalized sequence + founder outreach | |
| 138 | | **Medium Priority** | 4-7 | Personalized sequence | |
| 139 | | **Low Priority** | 1-3 | Batch campaign or skip | |
| 140 | |
| 141 | ## Phase 3: Sequence Generation |
| 142 | |
| 143 | ### Win-Back Sequence — High Priority (4 emails over 4 weeks) |
| 144 | |
| 145 | **Email 1: The Relevant Update (Day 0)** |
| 146 | |
| 147 | |
| 148 | Subject options: |
| 149 | A: "[First name], [specific thing] changed since we last spoke" |
| 150 | B: "We fixed the thing that made you leave" |
| 151 | C: "[Company] + [Your Product] — worth another look?" |
| 152 | |
| 153 | |
| 154 | |
| 155 | Hi [First name], |
| 156 | |
| 157 | [1 sentence acknowledging they left — no guilt, no desperation] |
| 158 | |
| 159 | Since then, we've [specific improvement that addresses their churn reason]: |
| 160 | |
| 161 | - [Change 1 — most relevant to their pain] |
| 162 | - [Change 2] |
| 163 | - [Change 3] |
| 164 | |
| 165 | [If you have a relevant customer proof point]: |
| 166 | "[Company in their space] switched back and saw [result]." |
| 167 | |
| 168 | Would it be worth a 15-minute look at what's different? |
| 169 | |
| 170 | [Soft CTA — no pressure] |
| 171 | |
| 172 | [Signature] |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 175 | **Email 2: The Proof Point (Day 7)** |
| 176 | |
| 177 | |
| 178 | Subject: "How [similar company] is using [product] now" |
| 179 | |
| 180 | Hi [First name], |
| 181 | |
| 182 | Quick follow-up — wanted to share something relevant. |
| 183 | |
| 184 | [Case study or proof point from a company similar to theirs]: |
| 185 | - [What they achieved] |
| 186 | - [Metric that matters] |
| 187 | |
| 188 | [1 sentence connecting this to their specific situation] |
| 189 | |
| 190 | [CTA — slightly stronger: "Want me to show you the new [feature] in 10 minutes?"] |
| 191 | |
| 192 | [Signature] |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 195 | **Email 3: The Offer (Day 14)** |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 198 | Subject: "[Specific offer — e.g., 'Free migration + 30 days on us']" |
| 199 | |
| 200 | Hi [First name], |
| 201 | |
| 202 | I know switching tools is a pain — that's usually what keeps people from |
| 203 | coming back even when the product has improved. |
| 204 | |
| 205 | So we're making it easy: |
| 206 | - [Offer detail 1 — e.g., "We'll handle the full migration"] |
| 207 | - [Offer detail 2 — e.g., "30 days free to test everything"] |
| 208 | - [Offer detail 3 — e.g., "Dedicated onboarding session"] |
| 209 | |
| 210 | [If applicable: "This offer is available through [date]"] |
| 211 | |
| 212 | Worth a conversation? |
| 213 | |
| 214 | [Signature] |
| 215 | |
| 216 | |
| 217 | **Email 4: The Breakup (Day 28)** |
| 218 | |
| 219 | |
| 220 | Subject: "Closing the loop" |
| 221 | |
| 222 | Hi [First name], |
| 223 | |
| 224 | Totally understand if the timing isn't right — just wanted to |
| 225 | make sure this didn't slip through the cracks. |
| 226 | |
| 227 | Quick summary of what's new: |
| 228 | → [Key improvement 1] |
| 229 | → [Key improvement 2] |
| 230 | → [Standing offer, if applicable] |
| 231 | |
| 232 | If anything changes on your end, my inbox is always open. |
| 233 | |
| 234 | [Signature] |
| 235 | |
| 236 | P.S. [Genuinely helpful resource — e.g., "We just published [relevant content]. |
| 237 | Worth a read regardless of which tool you're using."] |
| 238 | |
| 239 | |
| 240 | ### Win-Back Sequence — Medium Priority (3 emails over 3 weeks) |
| 241 | |
| 242 | Shorter, less personalized but still relevant: |
| 243 | |
| 244 | **Email 1:** Product update announcement + relevance to their use case |
| 245 | **Email 2:** Customer proof point + specific offer |
| 246 | **Email 3:** Soft breakup with resource share |
| 247 | |
| 248 | ### Win-Back Sequence — Competitor-Specific |
| 249 | |
| 250 | If they switched to a known competitor: |
| 251 | |
| 252 | **Email 1:** "How [product] compares to [competitor] today" — honest, non-aggressive comparison focused on what changed |
| 253 | **Email 2:** Customer story of someone who switched back from that specific competitor |
| 254 | **Email 3:** Offer + easy migration path |
| 255 | |
| 256 | ## Phase 4: Output Format |
| 257 | |
| 258 | |
| 259 | # Win-Back Opportunity Report — [DATE] |
| 260 | Churned accounts analyzed: [N] |
| 261 | Time window: [Churned between X and Y months ago] |
| 262 | |
| 263 | |
| 264 | |
| 265 | ## Summary |
| 266 | |
| 267 | | Priority | Accounts | Total MRR Opportunity | |
| 268 | |----------|----------|----------------------| |
| 269 | | High Priority | [N] | $[X]/mo | |
| 270 | | Medium Priority | [N] | $[X]/mo | |
| 271 | | Low Priority / Skip | [N] | $[X]/mo | |
| 272 | |
| 273 | **Total recoverable MRR:** $[X]/mo (estimated, assuming [Y%] win-back rate) |
| 274 | |
| 275 | |
| 276 | |
| 277 | ## High Priority Accounts |
| 278 | |
| 279 | ### [Company 1] — Churned: [date] | Former MRR: $[X] |
| 280 | **Churn reason:** [Reason] |
| 281 | **What's changed (them):** [Research findings] |
| 282 | **What's changed (us):** [Product updates that address their pain] |
| 283 | **Win-back angle:** [The core pitch] |
| 284 | **Contact:** [Name, title, email] |
| 285 | **Sequence:** [Attached — 4 emails, personalized] |
| 286 | |
| 287 | ### [Company 2] — ... |
| 288 | |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 291 | ## Medium Priority Accounts |
| 292 | |
| 293 | | Account | Churned | MRR | Churn Reason | Win-Back Angle | Score | |
| 294 | |---------|---------|-----|-------------|---------------|-------| |
| 295 | | [Name] | [Date] | $[X] | [Reason] | [Angle] | [N] | |
| 296 | |
| 297 | |
| 298 | |
| 299 | ## Email Sequences |
| 300 | |
| 301 | ### [Company 1] — Full Personalized Sequence |
| 302 | [Email 1: Subject + body] |
| 303 | [Email 2: Subject + body] |
| 304 | [Email 3: Subject + body] |
| 305 | [Email 4: Subject + body] |
| 306 | |
| 307 | ### [Company 2] — ... |
| 308 | |
| 309 | |
| 310 | |
| 311 | ## Accounts to Skip (and Why) |
| 312 | |
| 313 | | Account | Reason to Skip | |
| 314 | |---------|---------------| |
| 315 | | [Name] | [Still in same situation / company shut down / too recent] | |
| 316 | |
| 317 | |
| 318 | |
| 319 | ## Win-Back Campaign Setup |
| 320 | |
| 321 | If using Smartlead: |
| 322 | - Campaign name: "Win-Back — [Month] [Year]" |
| 323 | - Sequences: [Use generated sequences above] |
| 324 | - Timing: [Recommended send schedule] |
| 325 | - Sender: [Recommended — founder for high priority, CSM for medium] |
| 326 | |
| 327 | |
| 328 | Save to `clients/<client-name>/customer-success/win-back/win-back-report-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`. |
| 329 | |
| 330 | ## Cost |
| 331 | |
| 332 | | Component | Cost | |
| 333 | |-----------|------| |
| 334 | | Web research per churned account | Free | |
| 335 | | LinkedIn research (optional) | ~$0.25-0.50 per account | |
| 336 | | Sequence generation | Free (LLM reasoning) | |
| 337 | | **Total** | **Free — $5** (for ~10 accounts with LinkedIn research) | |
| 338 | |
| 339 | ## Tools Required |
| 340 | |
| 341 | **web_search** — for company and competitor research |
| 342 | **fetch_webpage** — for career pages, news, competitor reviews |
| 343 | **Optional:** `linkedin-profile-post-scraper` for contact monitoring |
| 344 | **Optional:** `review-site-scraper` for competitor dissatisfaction signals |
| 345 | **Optional:** `cold-email-outreach` for campaign creation |
| 346 | |
| 347 | ## Trigger Phrases |
| 348 | |
| 349 | "Which churned customers should we win back?" |
| 350 | "Build a win-back sequence for [customer]" |
| 351 | "Research our churn list for re-engagement" |
| 352 | "Run the win-back scan" |
| 353 | "Generate win-back emails for churned accounts" |
| 354 |