Customer Success Operations
Save churning customers through proactive health scoring and recovery plays.
How to use it
Claude Code
- Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into
~/.claude/skills/cs-operations. - Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
npx degit swan-gtm/gtm-skills/skills/rutger-katz/cs-operations#main ~/.claude/skills/cs-operationsFor one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/cs-operations.
Claude (web or desktop app)
- On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
- Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
- Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
- Check the skill is switched on.
- Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
- ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
- Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
- Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
- Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.
Source of Customer Success Operations
Show the full text406 lines
| name | title | description | category |
|---|---|---|---|
| cs-operations | Red account rescue | Save churning customers through proactive health scoring and recovery plays. Use when red accounts pile up unpredictably, renewal conversations turn contentious, or expansion-ready accounts slip away. Builds a 5-dimension health score (product usage, relationship quality, support friction, commercial trends, outcomes) updated weekly, triages red accounts into rescue mode or renewal-risk mode, and activates save plays with executive sponsorship, backed by the full post-sale operating model (onboarding, QBRs, CS-Sales handoffs, renewal governance). Produces a weekly red-account triage list and recovery playbooks by churn cause. Rule: a customer does not turn red on one signal; red means 3 or more health dimensions breaking at once. Trigger phrases: we keep losing customers, red accounts, health scoring, save play, churn autopsy, renewal price increase resistance. | RevOps |
Customer Success Operations
You are a CS operations architect. CS Ops is the post-sale revenue engine. It sits in the ICP Value Loops layer of the revenue operating system, owning Adopt → Realize Value → Renew → Expand. Without it, you're relying on individual heroics instead of systems.
The CS Ops Operating Model
Four pillars. Neglect any one and the system breaks.
PROCESS DESIGN TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS
├─ Playbooks ├─ CS Platform: Gainsight (Horizon AI, 2024+), ChurnZero,
├─ Workflows │ Vitally; all support real-time ML scoring (2026)
├─ Escalation paths ├─ Product analytics (Pendo, Amplitude)
├─ Governance ├─ Support (Zendesk, Intercom)
├─ Swimlanes ├─ Survey tools (NPS, CSAT; note: Delighted shut 30 Jun 2026)
└─ AI agents └─ Data warehouse integration; reverse ETL (Hightouch, Census)
DATA & ANALYTICS ENABLEMENT
├─ Health scores ├─ CSM onboarding (2 weeks, not 2 months)
│ (ML-powered, real-time) ├─ Playbook documentation
├─ Churn prediction ├─ Tools training
│ (ML+NLP ensemble) ├─ Certification on key processes
├─ Expansion scoring ├─ Knowledge base
├─ Cohort analysis └─ AI-assisted customer signal synthesis
└─ Team efficiency
CS Maturity Model
┌────────────┬──────────────┬────────────────┬───────────────┬──────────────┐
│ Stage │ Health Score │ Renewals │ Expansion │ Governance │
├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤
│ REACTIVE │ None. React │ Ad-hoc, │ Accidental │ CS isolated, │
│ │ to churn. │ customer-led │ │ no loops │
├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤
│ DEFINED │ Manual, CSM │ Playbook, 60d │ Signals ID'd │ Handoff doc │
│ │ judgment │ before expiry │ inconsistently│ exists │
├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤
│ PROACTIVE │ Composite, │ Automated 90d │ Scoring model │ Quarterly │
│ │ weekly auto │ process + save │ + targeted │ CS-Product │
│ │ alerts │ playbooks │ outreach │ forums │
├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤
│ PREDICTIVE │ ML model, │ Preventive │ Expansion │ Real-time │
│ │ >80% churn │ interventions, │ scoring feeds │ feedback │
│ │ accuracy │ <5% churn │ Sales pipeline│ loops │
└────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┴───────────────┴──────────────┘
If you're Reactive: stop everything else and move to Defined first.
Health Score Framework
The single most important CS Ops tool. Composite scores with weighted dimensions:
HEALTH SCORE = Weighted average of 5 dimensions
PRODUCT USAGE (35%)
Login frequency, feature adoption, depth of use, usage trend
Weight rationale: usage is the strongest churn predictor
RELATIONSHIP (25%)
Executive sponsor engaged, NPS response, meeting cadence, org adoption %
Weight rationale: champions save accounts
SUPPORT (18%)
Ticket volume trend, severity, resolution time, CSAT
Weight rationale: pain signals churn
COMMERCIAL (17%)
Contract value trend, payment history, expansion conversations
Weight rationale: money doesn't lie
OUTCOMES (5%)
Achieving stated goals, ROI realization, milestone completion
Weight rationale: data often incomplete early on
Traffic Light System
GREEN (80+): Expand. Growth partner posture. 2-5% churn risk (practice-based).
YELLOW (40-79): Intervene. Increase touchpoints. 15-30% churn risk (practice-based).
RED (<40): Save mode. Executive intervention. 60%+ churn risk (practice-based).
Health Score Anti-Patterns
Binary scores ("healthy" vs "at risk") → Use 0-100 scale with thresholds
Usage-only scores → Composite with multiple signals
Manual, updated quarterly → Automated, real-time or weekly minimum
Score says green but they churn → Calibrate against actual outcomes
Nobody acts on red accounts → CS Manager reviews reds weekly
EU Data Governance Note (GDPR Article 22): Health scores incorporate personal data (NPS responses, engagement metrics from personal profiles). If automated scoring drives material customer-facing decisions (e.g., renewal discounting, reduced support tier) without human review, you must establish documented lawful basis and provide individuals with the right to human review per Article 22. Recommended: reserve automated action for internal escalation only; require CSM/manager review before any customer-visible decision.
Segmentation & Coverage Models
┌──────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬────────────────────┐
│ Segment │ Criteria │ Coverage Model │ CSM Ratio │
├──────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│ HIGH-TOUCH │ >$50K ARR │ Named CSM │ 1:10-50 │
│ (Strategic) │ Complex product │ Quarterly EBRs │ (ChurnZero, 2026) │
│ │ High expansion │ Dedicated onboard│ AI-assisted: +25-50%│
├──────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│ MID-TOUCH │ $10-50K ARR │ Pooled CSM │ 1:100-200 │
│ (Scaled) │ Moderate complex│ Templated touches│ (ChurnZero, 2026) │
│ │ Growth potential│ Triggered playbks│ AI-assisted tools │
├──────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│ TECH-TOUCH │ <$10K ARR │ Automated │ 1:500-1000 │
│ (Digital-led)│ Self-serve │ In-app guidance │ (ChurnZero, 2026) │
│ │ Simple use case │ Community/webinar│ AI agents primary │
└──────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴────────────────────┘
Reassess tiers quarterly based on usage growth, health, and expansion potential.
Renewal Management
Start 120 days before contract end. Not 30. Starting at T-30 is too late for anything except discounting. This is the single canonical renewal timeline.
T-120 days: PREP
Renewal flag auto-created in CRM
CSM reviews health, usage, and expansion signals; Finance pulls contract
terms; Product flags blockers
If health < 40 (Red): escalate immediately, don't wait for T-90
Output: Renewal strategy (standard / at-risk save play / expansion)
T-90 days: HEALTH CHECK / KICKOFF
QBR conducted, executive alignment, pulse on value delivery
CSM prepares ROI / value-delivered summary
Internal alignment: any pricing changes, product updates?
If discount expiring: begin value-led conversation (see Renewal Discount Governance)
Score: Likely / At-risk / Needs work
T-60 days: PROPOSAL / CONVERSATION
Standard: Renewal proposal sent. Present value delivered, roadmap alignment, terms
At-risk: Executive sponsor conversation, barrier removal; activate save playbook
Expanding: Sales/CSM joint upsell conversation, present expansion proposal alongside renewal
T-30 days: NEGOTIATION
Contract sent; handle objections, escalate to CS leader if not signed
If discount negotiation: use graduated step-up (see Renewal Discount Governance)
Daily tracking of renewal pipeline
T-0: CLOSE
Contract signed or churned. Revenue booked, post-renewal thank you, reset for next cycle
If churned: initiate churn autopsy within 7 days
Feed learnings to Product
T+7: POST-RENEWAL CHECK-IN
Confirm satisfaction with terms, document win/loss reason
Set next QBR date, update health score
Track: On-time renewal rate, early renewal rate, save rate (red accounts renewed), renewal velocity.
Expansion Playbooks
Expansion is a process, not an event. Most expansion dies because nobody owns the handoff from CS to Sales or because the signal was visible but nobody acted on it.
Expansion Signals
USAGE: Hitting seat limits, new feature adoption, DAU increasing,
usage approaching plan limits (>80% utilization)
RELATIONSHIP: Champion promoted, new stakeholder/exec sponsor engaged, positive NPS,
new departments/teams using the product
COMMERCIAL: Org headcount growth, new budget cycle, cross-functional interest,
feature requests for premium-tier functionality
OUTCOMES: Value achieved ahead of schedule, ROI exceeded, new use cases,
positive health trend (score increasing 3+ months), referral/case study
Expansion Ownership Model
Small expansion (<20% ACV): CS owns end-to-end
Medium expansion (20-50%): CS identifies, Sales closes
Large expansion (>50% ACV): Sales owns, CS supports
CS-to-Sales handoff: CS prepares customer context, decision-maker, timeline, needs. Sales accepts or declines. If accepted, CS introduces Sales to champion and stays involved through close. Expansion motion: CS documents the signal in CRM → warm intro from CSM to AE/expansion AE → AE runs the commercial conversation while CSM provides context and stays on early calls → post-expansion, CS implements the expanded scope and tracks value on the new commitment.
For the 0-100 expansion scoring model (usage/stakeholder/feature/health/headroom weights), score-based ownership thresholds, account readiness triggers, and whitespace analysis, see references/expansion-scoring-model.md.
Onboarding Orchestration
The handoff is where retention is won or lost. A weak handoff creates context loss, broken promises, and a customer who feels like they're starting over. For the step-by-step Sales → CS handoff process and checklist, see the summary under "Sales → CS Handoff" below and references/sales-cs-handoff-template.md. This is the single canonical onboarding model.
DAY 1-7: ACTIVATION / KICKOFF
Welcome email (within 2 hours), license activation, kickoff scheduled
Kickoff call with key stakeholders; assign customer-side project owner
Success criteria and timeline confirmed: "What does success look like?"
(Use SPICED Impact as baseline)
DAY 8-30: IMPLEMENTATION / TECHNICAL SETUP
Configuration / environment setup, data migration, integration setup
Admin training, user training, weekly status calls, blocker resolution
Document known issues or customization needs
Milestone: Go-live readiness confirmed
DAY 31-60: STABILIZATION / USER ENABLEMENT
Go-live, first-week support surge (daily check-ins)
End-user training sessions, internal documentation/guides
Identify power users / internal champions, validate adoption metrics
Usage monitoring, issue resolution, user adoption tracking
First value delivered: "Here's the impact you're seeing"
DAY 61-90: OPTIMIZATION / FIRST VALUE
Confirm first value milestone achieved; capture success story (even informal)
Performance vs. success criteria, advanced feature rollout
Executive check-in, health score baseline set, first QBR/check-in scheduled
Transition to business-as-usual CSM cadence
Automation triggers: No kickoff by day 3 → reminder. Not go-live by day 30 → alert manager. Usage <20% by day 60 → intervention. Health <50 by day 90 → yellow playbook.
Track: Time to kickoff (<3d), time to first login (<7d), time to first value (TTFV) (<30d), go-live on schedule (90%+), onboarding completion rate (>90%), onboarding CSAT (90%+ top performers; recommended), feature adoption at T+30 (>3 core features).
Sales → CS Handoff
When a deal hits Closed Won, an automated notification routes the account to the assigned CSM with a CRM record containing the SPICED summary, stakeholders, contractual commitments, known risks, product/tier config, and any discount terms with expiry dates. The CSM reviews it, runs a short internal handoff call with the AE (what was promised, who's the champion/blocker, what success looks like, landmines), then sends the welcome email and schedules kickoff. A handoff quality check confirms the SPICED summary is complete, all stakeholders are in CRM, and discount terms are documented with expiry. For the full step-by-step timeline, Sales pre-handoff responsibilities, the three-way handoff meeting, and checklist, see references/sales-cs-handoff-template.md.
Event-Based Playbooks
USAGE DROP (WAU drops >30% week-over-week)
Action: CSM outreach within 24 hours
Root cause: Change, vacations, budget freeze, support issue?
NPS DETRACTOR (Score <6)
Action: Call within 48 hours
Document specific complaint, not generic dissatisfaction
CHAMPION DEPARTURE
Action: Identify new stakeholder within 1 week
Risk mitigation: Involve next-level executive immediately
SUPPORT ESCALATION (Sev-1 OR 3+ tickets in 7 days)
Action: Triage within 2 hours, CS + Support Manager
Renewal Discount Governance
The #1 cause of contentious renewals is a discount that was never documented to expire. At renewal, the customer anchors on what they paid, not what the product is worth. This is a structural governance failure: every discounted deal must carry a Discount_Expiry_Date in CRM, the T-120 workflow must flag expiring discounts automatically, and the CSM must prepare value justification before the conversation. The conversation framework leads with value (T-90), frames the step-up (T-60), and offers a graduated step-up only as a save play (T-30). GPO/consortium accounts get coordinated tier/volume validation from T-120 through T-30 with Deal Desk.
For the full discount sunset problem, the pricing conversation framework, the save-plays-with-pricing table, and GPO renewal coordination, see references/renewal-discount-governance.md. For discount governance policy (approval matrices, ACV tiers), see pricing-monetization-ops skill.
CS-Product Feedback Loop
Install the structural mechanisms that turn customer signal into product action: a quarterly advisory board (3-5 customer execs + Product VP), churn autopsies on 100% of churned accounts (CS Manager + Product Manager), feature request tagging with ARR/use case/competitive/expansion/blocker fields, and a monthly adoption blocker log feeding a dedicated Product queue.
For the full feedback loop architecture (owners, questions, outputs, and review cadence for each mechanism), see references/cs-product-feedback-architecture.md.
Key Metrics
REVENUE TARGETS
GRR 84% median (75th %ile 91%+; Optifai, 2026)
NRR 106% median (top performers >130%; Optifai, 2026)
Logo retention rate 80-90% (aspirational; industry median 70-80%)
Expansion rate (% ARR growth) 40% of new ARR from expansion (ZoomInfo, 2026)
OPERATIONAL
Time to first value <30 days (recommended)
Health score distribution >70% green (recommended)
QBR completion (high-touch) 100% (recommended)
Renewal on-time rate >90% (recommended)
Save rate (red accounts) >40% (practice-based)
EFFICIENCY
Accounts per CSM (by tier) See coverage model (sourced, 2026)
Admin time (% of total) <30% (recommended)
CSM attrition rate <15%/year (recommended)
LEADING INDICATORS
Accounts with declining usage Track weekly (recommended)
Accounts without exec sponsor <5% (recommended)
Days to complete renewal <60 days (recommended)
Core feature adoption rate >70% (recommended)
AI and Automation in CS Ops (2026)
Real-time health scoring, autonomous churn prediction, and AI-assisted signal synthesis are now standard in modern CS platforms. This is not "future state"; it's operational today.
Real-Time Predictive Scoring
Modern platforms (Gainsight Horizon AI, ChurnZero, Vitally) update health scores in real time rather than batch weekly. Triggers are now event-driven: usage cliff detected → CSM alert; NPS detractor submitted → auto-flag; champion departure → relationship score drops immediately. Churn prediction with ensemble ML plus NLP on unstructured signals (call transcripts, support tickets, email sentiment) cuts churn 15-30% within 12 months (2026 vendor research).
Autonomous Agents and Workflow
Renewal and expansion processes no longer require manual CSM review at every step. Autonomous agents monitor thresholds (usage >80% of plan, score drop >15pts), initiate escalation workflows, and in some cases send templated outreach. The CSM remains accountable but the agent handles routine hygiene: flag at-risk accounts, surface expansion candidates, suggest playbook actions. This frees CSMs to focus on high-touch strategy and executive relationships.
Dynamic Segmentation
Static ARR tiers are outdated. Modern platforms segment dynamically by usage trajectory, health trends, and expansion readiness. A sub-$10K account with 200% month-over-month growth and executive sponsor engagement moves into a higher-touch coverage tier automatically. Weekly re-segmentation based on behavioral signals means coverage shifts to where the opportunity is.
AI-Assisted Churn Autopsy and Insight Synthesis
Gainsight Horizon AI (2024+) and peers now offer automated call transcription, sentiment analysis, and account summary synthesis. Rather than manual CSM + PM churn autopsies, the system ingests call recordings, extracts decision-driver signals, compares against similar accounts, and surfaces likely product gaps. QBR prep no longer requires manual data gathering; AI-generated benchmarking insights ("You are 40% below similar customers in feature X") are delivered automatically to both CSM and customer.
Implementation rule: Deploy gradually. Start with real-time scoring; add autonomous escalation after 2 weeks; enable dynamic segmentation once you have clean usage data feeding the platform. Full AI adoption (transcription, synthesis, autonomous agents) requires data quality baseline of 80%+ field population.
Diagnostic Assessment
Score your CS Ops maturity. Count YES answers:
PROCESS: Documented playbooks? Defined renewal timeline? Health scoring
framework? Escalation paths? QBRs for all high-touch?
TECHNOLOGY: Dedicated CS platform? Integrates with product analytics?
Automated health scoring? Usage data visible to CSMs?
DATA: Can forecast churn 30+ days out? Health dashboards? Track
expansion signals? Segment by tier? Measure team efficiency?
ENABLEMENT: Structured CSM onboarding? Accessible playbooks? Process
certification? Monthly training?
GOVERNANCE: CS-Product feedback loop? CS-Sales handoff process? Exec
reviews CS metrics monthly? Churn autopsies? Expansion
ownership clear? Discount sunset tracking in place?
0-6 YES = Reactive. Fix: Define playbooks, build basic health scoring
7-13 YES = Defined. Fix: Integrate tech, automate playbooks
14-19 YES = Proactive. Fix: Build predictive models, optimize coverage
20-25 YES = Predictive. Fix: AI-assisted coaching, autonomous workflows
Process Operating Cadence
Health scoring and renewal frameworks answer "who is at risk?" and "how do we retain them?" They depend on a structured review cadence and escalation discipline. A health score without a review cadence is a dashboard no one acts on. The cadence is the operating system; the score is the signal.
Manual review cadence (foundation for all tiers):
- Weekly: CSM reviews accounts with a score drop >10pts; flag any Green→Yellow or Yellow→Red (CSM + CS Lead).
- Monthly: Full health score review of all accounts; any Red account reviewed with CS Lead + AE; scores updated on new data.
- Quarterly: Portfolio health review, QBR prep for T1 accounts, Red account recovery planning.
Event-driven automation (2026+, layered on top):
Modern CS platforms trigger actions in real time on usage cliffs (WAU drop >30%), NPS detractors, champion departures, and score transitions. Autonomous agents notify CSMs of threshold breaches and recommend escalation. This does not replace the manual cadence; it augments it. The CSM still owns accountability and strategy, but routine monitoring is automated.
Red accounts: escalate within 24h. When a customer turns Red, the CSM (or automated alert) notifies the CS Lead, who reviews the health breakdown and jointly decides with the AE between rescue mode (>90 days to renewal) and renewal risk mode (<90 days; activate the renewal process immediately, don't wait for T-90). For the full Red Account Playbook (rescue mode, renewal risk mode, commercial options) and the complete health monitoring cadence table, see references/red-account-playbook.md.
QBRs are the highest-leverage CS touchpoint for T1 accounts and most fail by looking backwards rather than forwards. For the 45-60 minute agenda structure and cadence-by-tier guidance, see references/qbr-process-template.md.
How to Use This Skill
"We keep losing customers but don't know why": Start with health scoring. Build the 5-dimension composite score. You'll see patterns within 4 weeks.
"Our CS team is drowning": Segmentation problem. Build the 3-tier coverage model. Most teams try to high-touch everyone. That doesn't scale past 50 accounts.
"Expansion is left on the table": Build expansion signals and scoring. Define the CS-Sales handoff. Most expansion dies because nobody owns the handoff.
"Product doesn't listen to CS": Install the feedback loop: churn autopsies, feature request tagging with ARR impact, quarterly advisory board. Product responds to revenue data.
"We need to build CS Ops from scratch": Run the diagnostic. Score your maturity. Fix the weakest pillar first. Month 1: playbooks + basic health scoring. Month 2: renewal process. Month 3: automation.
"Discounts are expiring and customers are pushing back": Install the renewal discount governance framework. Document every discount with an expiry date. Lead with value at T-90, frame the step-up at T-60, and have graduated step-up as a save play only at T-30. For discount governance policy (approval matrices, ACV tiers), see pricing-monetization-ops skill.
"GPO/consortium accounts coming up for renewal": Check GPO master record. Validate actual vs. committed volume. Coordinate with Deal Desk. No ad-hoc terms outside the GPO framework.
Reference Files
| File | When to read | What's inside |
|---|---|---|
references/customer-lifecycle-plays.md |
Choosing the right CS action for an account's phase | Four-phase classification, health interpretation per phase, trigger plays, expansion timing rule |
references/renewal-discount-governance.md |
Discount expiring / contentious renewal pricing | Discount sunset problem, pricing conversation framework, save-plays-with-pricing table, GPO renewal coordination |
references/expansion-scoring-model.md |
Quantifying/prioritizing expansion | 0-100 scoring model, score-based ownership thresholds, readiness triggers, whitespace analysis |
references/sales-cs-handoff-template.md |
Designing the Closed-Won → CS handoff | Step-by-step T+0 to T+5 timeline, Sales pre-handoff duties, handoff meeting, quality checklist |
references/red-account-playbook.md |
A customer turns Red | Rescue mode, renewal risk mode, commercial options, full health monitoring cadence table |
references/qbr-process-template.md |
Designing or running a QBR | 45-60 min agenda structure, cadence by tier |
references/cs-product-feedback-architecture.md |
Building the CS-Product loop | Advisory board, churn autopsy, feature request tagging, adoption blocker log |
Operator Templates: Forecasting Worksheet (Renewals Tab)
Use a forecasting worksheet with dedicated renewal modeling tabs to model: renewal cohort sizing, churn impact on ARR, expansion uplift scenarios.
What good looks like
- Every account carries a health score across five dimensions, refreshed weekly.
- Red accounts surface on a triage list with an owner and a named recovery play before the renewal window opens.
- Renewal conversations start from documented value evidence, not a pricing surprise.
- Churn postmortems feed a playbook per churn cause instead of anecdotes.
Built by Neon Triforce
| 1 | |
| 2 | name "cs-operations" |
| 3 | title Red account rescue |
| 4 | description "Save churning customers through proactive health scoring and recovery plays. Use when red accounts pile up unpredictably, renewal conversations turn contentious, or expansion-ready accounts slip away. Builds a 5-dimension health score (product usage, relationship quality, support friction, commercial trends, outcomes) updated weekly, triages red accounts into rescue mode or renewal-risk mode, and activates save plays with executive sponsorship, backed by the full post-sale operating model (onboarding, QBRs, CS-Sales handoffs, renewal governance). Produces a weekly red-account triage list and recovery playbooks by churn cause. Rule: a customer does not turn red on one signal; red means 3 or more health dimensions breaking at once. Trigger phrases: we keep losing customers, red accounts, health scoring, save play, churn autopsy, renewal price increase resistance." |
| 5 | category RevOps |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | # Customer Success Operations |
| 9 | |
| 10 | You are a CS operations architect. CS Ops is the post-sale revenue engine. It sits in the ICP Value Loops layer of the revenue operating system, owning Adopt → Realize Value → Renew → Expand. Without it, you're relying on individual heroics instead of systems. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ## The CS Ops Operating Model |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Four pillars. Neglect any one and the system breaks. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | PROCESS DESIGN TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS |
| 18 | ├─ Playbooks ├─ CS Platform: Gainsight (Horizon AI, 2024+), ChurnZero, |
| 19 | ├─ Workflows │ Vitally; all support real-time ML scoring (2026) |
| 20 | ├─ Escalation paths ├─ Product analytics (Pendo, Amplitude) |
| 21 | ├─ Governance ├─ Support (Zendesk, Intercom) |
| 22 | ├─ Swimlanes ├─ Survey tools (NPS, CSAT; note: Delighted shut 30 Jun 2026) |
| 23 | └─ AI agents └─ Data warehouse integration; reverse ETL (Hightouch, Census) |
| 24 | |
| 25 | DATA & ANALYTICS ENABLEMENT |
| 26 | ├─ Health scores ├─ CSM onboarding (2 weeks, not 2 months) |
| 27 | │ (ML-powered, real-time) ├─ Playbook documentation |
| 28 | ├─ Churn prediction ├─ Tools training |
| 29 | │ (ML+NLP ensemble) ├─ Certification on key processes |
| 30 | ├─ Expansion scoring ├─ Knowledge base |
| 31 | ├─ Cohort analysis └─ AI-assisted customer signal synthesis |
| 32 | └─ Team efficiency |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ## CS Maturity Model |
| 36 | |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ┌────────────┬──────────────┬────────────────┬───────────────┬──────────────┐ |
| 39 | │ Stage │ Health Score │ Renewals │ Expansion │ Governance │ |
| 40 | ├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤ |
| 41 | │ REACTIVE │ None. React │ Ad-hoc, │ Accidental │ CS isolated, │ |
| 42 | │ │ to churn. │ customer-led │ │ no loops │ |
| 43 | ├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤ |
| 44 | │ DEFINED │ Manual, CSM │ Playbook, 60d │ Signals ID'd │ Handoff doc │ |
| 45 | │ │ judgment │ before expiry │ inconsistently│ exists │ |
| 46 | ├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤ |
| 47 | │ PROACTIVE │ Composite, │ Automated 90d │ Scoring model │ Quarterly │ |
| 48 | │ │ weekly auto │ process + save │ + targeted │ CS-Product │ |
| 49 | │ │ alerts │ playbooks │ outreach │ forums │ |
| 50 | ├────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┤ |
| 51 | │ PREDICTIVE │ ML model, │ Preventive │ Expansion │ Real-time │ |
| 52 | │ │ >80% churn │ interventions, │ scoring feeds │ feedback │ |
| 53 | │ │ accuracy │ <5% churn │ Sales pipeline│ loops │ |
| 54 | └────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┴───────────────┴──────────────┘ |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | If you're Reactive: stop everything else and move to Defined first. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ## Health Score Framework |
| 60 | |
| 61 | The single most important CS Ops tool. Composite scores with weighted dimensions: |
| 62 | |
| 63 | |
| 64 | HEALTH SCORE = Weighted average of 5 dimensions |
| 65 | |
| 66 | PRODUCT USAGE (35%) |
| 67 | Login frequency, feature adoption, depth of use, usage trend |
| 68 | Weight rationale: usage is the strongest churn predictor |
| 69 | |
| 70 | RELATIONSHIP (25%) |
| 71 | Executive sponsor engaged, NPS response, meeting cadence, org adoption % |
| 72 | Weight rationale: champions save accounts |
| 73 | |
| 74 | SUPPORT (18%) |
| 75 | Ticket volume trend, severity, resolution time, CSAT |
| 76 | Weight rationale: pain signals churn |
| 77 | |
| 78 | COMMERCIAL (17%) |
| 79 | Contract value trend, payment history, expansion conversations |
| 80 | Weight rationale: money doesn't lie |
| 81 | |
| 82 | OUTCOMES (5%) |
| 83 | Achieving stated goals, ROI realization, milestone completion |
| 84 | Weight rationale: data often incomplete early on |
| 85 | |
| 86 | |
| 87 | ### Traffic Light System |
| 88 | |
| 89 | |
| 90 | GREEN (80+): Expand. Growth partner posture. 2-5% churn risk (practice-based). |
| 91 | YELLOW (40-79): Intervene. Increase touchpoints. 15-30% churn risk (practice-based). |
| 92 | RED (<40): Save mode. Executive intervention. 60%+ churn risk (practice-based). |
| 93 | |
| 94 | |
| 95 | ### Health Score Anti-Patterns |
| 96 | |
| 97 | |
| 98 | Binary scores ("healthy" vs "at risk") → Use 0-100 scale with thresholds |
| 99 | Usage-only scores → Composite with multiple signals |
| 100 | Manual, updated quarterly → Automated, real-time or weekly minimum |
| 101 | Score says green but they churn → Calibrate against actual outcomes |
| 102 | Nobody acts on red accounts → CS Manager reviews reds weekly |
| 103 | |
| 104 | |
| 105 | **EU Data Governance Note (GDPR Article 22):** Health scores incorporate personal data (NPS responses, engagement metrics from personal profiles). If automated scoring drives material customer-facing decisions (e.g., renewal discounting, reduced support tier) without human review, you must establish documented lawful basis and provide individuals with the right to human review per Article 22. Recommended: reserve automated action for internal escalation only; require CSM/manager review before any customer-visible decision. |
| 106 | |
| 107 | ## Segmentation & Coverage Models |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ┌──────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬────────────────────┐ |
| 111 | │ Segment │ Criteria │ Coverage Model │ CSM Ratio │ |
| 112 | ├──────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────┤ |
| 113 | │ HIGH-TOUCH │ >$50K ARR │ Named CSM │ 1:10-50 │ |
| 114 | │ (Strategic) │ Complex product │ Quarterly EBRs │ (ChurnZero, 2026) │ |
| 115 | │ │ High expansion │ Dedicated onboard│ AI-assisted: +25-50%│ |
| 116 | ├──────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────┤ |
| 117 | │ MID-TOUCH │ $10-50K ARR │ Pooled CSM │ 1:100-200 │ |
| 118 | │ (Scaled) │ Moderate complex│ Templated touches│ (ChurnZero, 2026) │ |
| 119 | │ │ Growth potential│ Triggered playbks│ AI-assisted tools │ |
| 120 | ├──────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────┤ |
| 121 | │ TECH-TOUCH │ <$10K ARR │ Automated │ 1:500-1000 │ |
| 122 | │ (Digital-led)│ Self-serve │ In-app guidance │ (ChurnZero, 2026) │ |
| 123 | │ │ Simple use case │ Community/webinar│ AI agents primary │ |
| 124 | └──────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴────────────────────┘ |
| 125 | |
| 126 | |
| 127 | Reassess tiers quarterly based on usage growth, health, and expansion potential. |
| 128 | |
| 129 | ## Renewal Management |
| 130 | |
| 131 | Start 120 days before contract end. Not 30. Starting at T-30 is too late for anything except discounting. This is the single canonical renewal timeline. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | T-120 days: PREP |
| 135 | Renewal flag auto-created in CRM |
| 136 | CSM reviews health, usage, and expansion signals; Finance pulls contract |
| 137 | terms; Product flags blockers |
| 138 | If health < 40 (Red): escalate immediately, don't wait for T-90 |
| 139 | Output: Renewal strategy (standard / at-risk save play / expansion) |
| 140 | |
| 141 | T-90 days: HEALTH CHECK / KICKOFF |
| 142 | QBR conducted, executive alignment, pulse on value delivery |
| 143 | CSM prepares ROI / value-delivered summary |
| 144 | Internal alignment: any pricing changes, product updates? |
| 145 | If discount expiring: begin value-led conversation (see Renewal Discount Governance) |
| 146 | Score: Likely / At-risk / Needs work |
| 147 | |
| 148 | T-60 days: PROPOSAL / CONVERSATION |
| 149 | Standard: Renewal proposal sent. Present value delivered, roadmap alignment, terms |
| 150 | At-risk: Executive sponsor conversation, barrier removal; activate save playbook |
| 151 | Expanding: Sales/CSM joint upsell conversation, present expansion proposal alongside renewal |
| 152 | |
| 153 | T-30 days: NEGOTIATION |
| 154 | Contract sent; handle objections, escalate to CS leader if not signed |
| 155 | If discount negotiation: use graduated step-up (see Renewal Discount Governance) |
| 156 | Daily tracking of renewal pipeline |
| 157 | |
| 158 | T-0: CLOSE |
| 159 | Contract signed or churned. Revenue booked, post-renewal thank you, reset for next cycle |
| 160 | If churned: initiate churn autopsy within 7 days |
| 161 | Feed learnings to Product |
| 162 | |
| 163 | T+7: POST-RENEWAL CHECK-IN |
| 164 | Confirm satisfaction with terms, document win/loss reason |
| 165 | Set next QBR date, update health score |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | **Track:** On-time renewal rate, early renewal rate, save rate (red accounts renewed), renewal velocity. |
| 169 | |
| 170 | ## Expansion Playbooks |
| 171 | |
| 172 | Expansion is a process, not an event. Most expansion dies because nobody owns the handoff from CS to Sales or because the signal was visible but nobody acted on it. |
| 173 | |
| 174 | ### Expansion Signals |
| 175 | |
| 176 | |
| 177 | USAGE: Hitting seat limits, new feature adoption, DAU increasing, |
| 178 | usage approaching plan limits (>80% utilization) |
| 179 | RELATIONSHIP: Champion promoted, new stakeholder/exec sponsor engaged, positive NPS, |
| 180 | new departments/teams using the product |
| 181 | COMMERCIAL: Org headcount growth, new budget cycle, cross-functional interest, |
| 182 | feature requests for premium-tier functionality |
| 183 | OUTCOMES: Value achieved ahead of schedule, ROI exceeded, new use cases, |
| 184 | positive health trend (score increasing 3+ months), referral/case study |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 187 | ### Expansion Ownership Model |
| 188 | |
| 189 | |
| 190 | Small expansion (<20% ACV): CS owns end-to-end |
| 191 | Medium expansion (20-50%): CS identifies, Sales closes |
| 192 | Large expansion (>50% ACV): Sales owns, CS supports |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 195 | CS-to-Sales handoff: CS prepares customer context, decision-maker, timeline, needs. Sales accepts or declines. If accepted, CS introduces Sales to champion and stays involved through close. Expansion motion: CS documents the signal in CRM → warm intro from CSM to AE/expansion AE → AE runs the commercial conversation while CSM provides context and stays on early calls → post-expansion, CS implements the expanded scope and tracks value on the new commitment. |
| 196 | |
| 197 | For the 0-100 expansion scoring model (usage/stakeholder/feature/health/headroom weights), score-based ownership thresholds, account readiness triggers, and whitespace analysis, see `references/expansion-scoring-model.md`. |
| 198 | |
| 199 | ## Onboarding Orchestration |
| 200 | |
| 201 | The handoff is where retention is won or lost. A weak handoff creates context loss, broken promises, and a customer who feels like they're starting over. For the step-by-step Sales → CS handoff process and checklist, see the summary under "Sales → CS Handoff" below and `references/sales-cs-handoff-template.md`. This is the single canonical onboarding model. |
| 202 | |
| 203 | |
| 204 | DAY 1-7: ACTIVATION / KICKOFF |
| 205 | Welcome email (within 2 hours), license activation, kickoff scheduled |
| 206 | Kickoff call with key stakeholders; assign customer-side project owner |
| 207 | Success criteria and timeline confirmed: "What does success look like?" |
| 208 | (Use SPICED Impact as baseline) |
| 209 | |
| 210 | DAY 8-30: IMPLEMENTATION / TECHNICAL SETUP |
| 211 | Configuration / environment setup, data migration, integration setup |
| 212 | Admin training, user training, weekly status calls, blocker resolution |
| 213 | Document known issues or customization needs |
| 214 | Milestone: Go-live readiness confirmed |
| 215 | |
| 216 | DAY 31-60: STABILIZATION / USER ENABLEMENT |
| 217 | Go-live, first-week support surge (daily check-ins) |
| 218 | End-user training sessions, internal documentation/guides |
| 219 | Identify power users / internal champions, validate adoption metrics |
| 220 | Usage monitoring, issue resolution, user adoption tracking |
| 221 | First value delivered: "Here's the impact you're seeing" |
| 222 | |
| 223 | DAY 61-90: OPTIMIZATION / FIRST VALUE |
| 224 | Confirm first value milestone achieved; capture success story (even informal) |
| 225 | Performance vs. success criteria, advanced feature rollout |
| 226 | Executive check-in, health score baseline set, first QBR/check-in scheduled |
| 227 | Transition to business-as-usual CSM cadence |
| 228 | |
| 229 | |
| 230 | **Automation triggers:** No kickoff by day 3 → reminder. Not go-live by day 30 → alert manager. Usage <20% by day 60 → intervention. Health <50 by day 90 → yellow playbook. |
| 231 | |
| 232 | **Track:** Time to kickoff (<3d), time to first login (<7d), time to first value (TTFV) (<30d), go-live on schedule (90%+), onboarding completion rate (>90%), onboarding CSAT (90%+ top performers; recommended), feature adoption at T+30 (>3 core features). |
| 233 | |
| 234 | ### Sales → CS Handoff |
| 235 | |
| 236 | When a deal hits Closed Won, an automated notification routes the account to the assigned CSM with a CRM record containing the SPICED summary, stakeholders, contractual commitments, known risks, product/tier config, and any discount terms with expiry dates. The CSM reviews it, runs a short internal handoff call with the AE (what was promised, who's the champion/blocker, what success looks like, landmines), then sends the welcome email and schedules kickoff. A handoff quality check confirms the SPICED summary is complete, all stakeholders are in CRM, and discount terms are documented with expiry. For the full step-by-step timeline, Sales pre-handoff responsibilities, the three-way handoff meeting, and checklist, see `references/sales-cs-handoff-template.md`. |
| 237 | |
| 238 | ## Event-Based Playbooks |
| 239 | |
| 240 | |
| 241 | USAGE DROP (WAU drops >30% week-over-week) |
| 242 | Action: CSM outreach within 24 hours |
| 243 | Root cause: Change, vacations, budget freeze, support issue? |
| 244 | |
| 245 | NPS DETRACTOR (Score <6) |
| 246 | Action: Call within 48 hours |
| 247 | Document specific complaint, not generic dissatisfaction |
| 248 | |
| 249 | CHAMPION DEPARTURE |
| 250 | Action: Identify new stakeholder within 1 week |
| 251 | Risk mitigation: Involve next-level executive immediately |
| 252 | |
| 253 | SUPPORT ESCALATION (Sev-1 OR 3+ tickets in 7 days) |
| 254 | Action: Triage within 2 hours, CS + Support Manager |
| 255 | |
| 256 | |
| 257 | ## Renewal Discount Governance |
| 258 | |
| 259 | The #1 cause of contentious renewals is a discount that was never documented to expire. At renewal, the customer anchors on what they paid, not what the product is worth. This is a structural governance failure: every discounted deal must carry a `Discount_Expiry_Date` in CRM, the T-120 workflow must flag expiring discounts automatically, and the CSM must prepare value justification before the conversation. The conversation framework leads with value (T-90), frames the step-up (T-60), and offers a graduated step-up only as a save play (T-30). GPO/consortium accounts get coordinated tier/volume validation from T-120 through T-30 with Deal Desk. |
| 260 | |
| 261 | For the full discount sunset problem, the pricing conversation framework, the save-plays-with-pricing table, and GPO renewal coordination, see `references/renewal-discount-governance.md`. For discount governance policy (approval matrices, ACV tiers), see pricing-monetization-ops skill. |
| 262 | |
| 263 | ## CS-Product Feedback Loop |
| 264 | |
| 265 | Install the structural mechanisms that turn customer signal into product action: a quarterly advisory board (3-5 customer execs + Product VP), churn autopsies on 100% of churned accounts (CS Manager + Product Manager), feature request tagging with ARR/use case/competitive/expansion/blocker fields, and a monthly adoption blocker log feeding a dedicated Product queue. |
| 266 | |
| 267 | For the full feedback loop architecture (owners, questions, outputs, and review cadence for each mechanism), see `references/cs-product-feedback-architecture.md`. |
| 268 | |
| 269 | ## Key Metrics |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 272 | REVENUE TARGETS |
| 273 | GRR 84% median (75th %ile 91%+; Optifai, 2026) |
| 274 | NRR 106% median (top performers >130%; Optifai, 2026) |
| 275 | Logo retention rate 80-90% (aspirational; industry median 70-80%) |
| 276 | Expansion rate (% ARR growth) 40% of new ARR from expansion (ZoomInfo, 2026) |
| 277 | |
| 278 | OPERATIONAL |
| 279 | Time to first value <30 days (recommended) |
| 280 | Health score distribution >70% green (recommended) |
| 281 | QBR completion (high-touch) 100% (recommended) |
| 282 | Renewal on-time rate >90% (recommended) |
| 283 | Save rate (red accounts) >40% (practice-based) |
| 284 | |
| 285 | EFFICIENCY |
| 286 | Accounts per CSM (by tier) See coverage model (sourced, 2026) |
| 287 | Admin time (% of total) <30% (recommended) |
| 288 | CSM attrition rate <15%/year (recommended) |
| 289 | |
| 290 | LEADING INDICATORS |
| 291 | Accounts with declining usage Track weekly (recommended) |
| 292 | Accounts without exec sponsor <5% (recommended) |
| 293 | Days to complete renewal <60 days (recommended) |
| 294 | Core feature adoption rate >70% (recommended) |
| 295 | |
| 296 | |
| 297 | ## AI and Automation in CS Ops (2026) |
| 298 | |
| 299 | Real-time health scoring, autonomous churn prediction, and AI-assisted signal synthesis are now standard in modern CS platforms. This is not "future state"; it's operational today. |
| 300 | |
| 301 | ### Real-Time Predictive Scoring |
| 302 | |
| 303 | Modern platforms (Gainsight Horizon AI, ChurnZero, Vitally) update health scores in real time rather than batch weekly. Triggers are now event-driven: usage cliff detected → CSM alert; NPS detractor submitted → auto-flag; champion departure → relationship score drops immediately. Churn prediction with ensemble ML plus NLP on unstructured signals (call transcripts, support tickets, email sentiment) cuts churn 15-30% within 12 months (2026 vendor research). |
| 304 | |
| 305 | ### Autonomous Agents and Workflow |
| 306 | |
| 307 | Renewal and expansion processes no longer require manual CSM review at every step. Autonomous agents monitor thresholds (usage >80% of plan, score drop >15pts), initiate escalation workflows, and in some cases send templated outreach. The CSM remains accountable but the agent handles routine hygiene: flag at-risk accounts, surface expansion candidates, suggest playbook actions. This frees CSMs to focus on high-touch strategy and executive relationships. |
| 308 | |
| 309 | ### Dynamic Segmentation |
| 310 | |
| 311 | Static ARR tiers are outdated. Modern platforms segment dynamically by usage trajectory, health trends, and expansion readiness. A sub-$10K account with 200% month-over-month growth and executive sponsor engagement moves into a higher-touch coverage tier automatically. Weekly re-segmentation based on behavioral signals means coverage shifts to where the opportunity is. |
| 312 | |
| 313 | ### AI-Assisted Churn Autopsy and Insight Synthesis |
| 314 | |
| 315 | Gainsight Horizon AI (2024+) and peers now offer automated call transcription, sentiment analysis, and account summary synthesis. Rather than manual CSM + PM churn autopsies, the system ingests call recordings, extracts decision-driver signals, compares against similar accounts, and surfaces likely product gaps. QBR prep no longer requires manual data gathering; AI-generated benchmarking insights ("You are 40% below similar customers in feature X") are delivered automatically to both CSM and customer. |
| 316 | |
| 317 | **Implementation rule:** Deploy gradually. Start with real-time scoring; add autonomous escalation after 2 weeks; enable dynamic segmentation once you have clean usage data feeding the platform. Full AI adoption (transcription, synthesis, autonomous agents) requires data quality baseline of 80%+ field population. |
| 318 | |
| 319 | ## Diagnostic Assessment |
| 320 | |
| 321 | Score your CS Ops maturity. Count YES answers: |
| 322 | |
| 323 | |
| 324 | PROCESS: Documented playbooks? Defined renewal timeline? Health scoring |
| 325 | framework? Escalation paths? QBRs for all high-touch? |
| 326 | TECHNOLOGY: Dedicated CS platform? Integrates with product analytics? |
| 327 | Automated health scoring? Usage data visible to CSMs? |
| 328 | DATA: Can forecast churn 30+ days out? Health dashboards? Track |
| 329 | expansion signals? Segment by tier? Measure team efficiency? |
| 330 | ENABLEMENT: Structured CSM onboarding? Accessible playbooks? Process |
| 331 | certification? Monthly training? |
| 332 | GOVERNANCE: CS-Product feedback loop? CS-Sales handoff process? Exec |
| 333 | reviews CS metrics monthly? Churn autopsies? Expansion |
| 334 | ownership clear? Discount sunset tracking in place? |
| 335 | |
| 336 | 0-6 YES = Reactive. Fix: Define playbooks, build basic health scoring |
| 337 | 7-13 YES = Defined. Fix: Integrate tech, automate playbooks |
| 338 | 14-19 YES = Proactive. Fix: Build predictive models, optimize coverage |
| 339 | 20-25 YES = Predictive. Fix: AI-assisted coaching, autonomous workflows |
| 340 | |
| 341 | |
| 342 | ## Process Operating Cadence |
| 343 | |
| 344 | Health scoring and renewal frameworks answer "who is at risk?" and "how do we retain them?" They depend on a structured review cadence and escalation discipline. A health score without a review cadence is a dashboard no one acts on. The cadence is the operating system; the score is the signal. |
| 345 | |
| 346 | **Manual review cadence (foundation for all tiers):** |
| 347 | |
| 348 | **Weekly:** CSM reviews accounts with a score drop >10pts; flag any Green→Yellow or Yellow→Red (CSM + CS Lead). |
| 349 | **Monthly:** Full health score review of all accounts; any Red account reviewed with CS Lead + AE; scores updated on new data. |
| 350 | **Quarterly:** Portfolio health review, QBR prep for T1 accounts, Red account recovery planning. |
| 351 | |
| 352 | **Event-driven automation (2026+, layered on top):** |
| 353 | |
| 354 | Modern CS platforms trigger actions in real time on usage cliffs (WAU drop >30%), NPS detractors, champion departures, and score transitions. Autonomous agents notify CSMs of threshold breaches and recommend escalation. This does not replace the manual cadence; it augments it. The CSM still owns accountability and strategy, but routine monitoring is automated. |
| 355 | |
| 356 | **Red accounts: escalate within 24h.** When a customer turns Red, the CSM (or automated alert) notifies the CS Lead, who reviews the health breakdown and jointly decides with the AE between rescue mode (>90 days to renewal) and renewal risk mode (<90 days; activate the renewal process immediately, don't wait for T-90). For the full Red Account Playbook (rescue mode, renewal risk mode, commercial options) and the complete health monitoring cadence table, see `references/red-account-playbook.md`. |
| 357 | |
| 358 | QBRs are the highest-leverage CS touchpoint for T1 accounts and most fail by looking backwards rather than forwards. For the 45-60 minute agenda structure and cadence-by-tier guidance, see `references/qbr-process-template.md`. |
| 359 | |
| 360 | |
| 361 | |
| 362 | ## How to Use This Skill |
| 363 | |
| 364 | **"We keep losing customers but don't know why":** Start with health scoring. Build the 5-dimension composite score. You'll see patterns within 4 weeks. |
| 365 | |
| 366 | **"Our CS team is drowning":** Segmentation problem. Build the 3-tier coverage model. Most teams try to high-touch everyone. That doesn't scale past 50 accounts. |
| 367 | |
| 368 | **"Expansion is left on the table":** Build expansion signals and scoring. Define the CS-Sales handoff. Most expansion dies because nobody owns the handoff. |
| 369 | |
| 370 | **"Product doesn't listen to CS":** Install the feedback loop: churn autopsies, feature request tagging with ARR impact, quarterly advisory board. Product responds to revenue data. |
| 371 | |
| 372 | **"We need to build CS Ops from scratch":** Run the diagnostic. Score your maturity. Fix the weakest pillar first. Month 1: playbooks + basic health scoring. Month 2: renewal process. Month 3: automation. |
| 373 | |
| 374 | **"Discounts are expiring and customers are pushing back":** Install the renewal discount governance framework. Document every discount with an expiry date. Lead with value at T-90, frame the step-up at T-60, and have graduated step-up as a save play only at T-30. For discount governance policy (approval matrices, ACV tiers), see pricing-monetization-ops skill. |
| 375 | |
| 376 | **"GPO/consortium accounts coming up for renewal":** Check GPO master record. Validate actual vs. committed volume. Coordinate with Deal Desk. No ad-hoc terms outside the GPO framework. |
| 377 | |
| 378 | |
| 379 | |
| 380 | ## Reference Files |
| 381 | |
| 382 | | File | When to read | What's inside | |
| 383 | |------|-------------|---------------| |
| 384 | | `references/customer-lifecycle-plays.md` | Choosing the right CS action for an account's phase | Four-phase classification, health interpretation per phase, trigger plays, expansion timing rule | |
| 385 | | `references/renewal-discount-governance.md` | Discount expiring / contentious renewal pricing | Discount sunset problem, pricing conversation framework, save-plays-with-pricing table, GPO renewal coordination | |
| 386 | | `references/expansion-scoring-model.md` | Quantifying/prioritizing expansion | 0-100 scoring model, score-based ownership thresholds, readiness triggers, whitespace analysis | |
| 387 | | `references/sales-cs-handoff-template.md` | Designing the Closed-Won → CS handoff | Step-by-step T+0 to T+5 timeline, Sales pre-handoff duties, handoff meeting, quality checklist | |
| 388 | | `references/red-account-playbook.md` | A customer turns Red | Rescue mode, renewal risk mode, commercial options, full health monitoring cadence table | |
| 389 | | `references/qbr-process-template.md` | Designing or running a QBR | 45-60 min agenda structure, cadence by tier | |
| 390 | | `references/cs-product-feedback-architecture.md` | Building the CS-Product loop | Advisory board, churn autopsy, feature request tagging, adoption blocker log | |
| 391 | |
| 392 | |
| 393 | |
| 394 | ## Operator Templates: Forecasting Worksheet (Renewals Tab) |
| 395 | |
| 396 | Use a forecasting worksheet with dedicated renewal modeling tabs to model: renewal cohort sizing, churn impact on ARR, expansion uplift scenarios. |
| 397 | |
| 398 | ## What good looks like |
| 399 | |
| 400 | Every account carries a health score across five dimensions, refreshed weekly. |
| 401 | Red accounts surface on a triage list with an owner and a named recovery play before the renewal window opens. |
| 402 | Renewal conversations start from documented value evidence, not a pricing surprise. |
| 403 | Churn postmortems feed a playbook per churn cause instead of anecdotes. |
| 404 | |
| 405 | > Built by [Neon Triforce] |
| 406 |
Discussion
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Customer support.