Content type template reference skill
Index and guide to the 12 content templates in templates/.
by AgriciDaniel·MIT license·★ 2,219 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗
Files of Content type template reference
AgriciDaniel/
Show the full text587 lines
Content Type Template Reference
Index and guide to the 12 content templates in templates/. These
templates are structural blueprints that /blog write uses to generate
consistently optimized content. This reference explains when to use each
template, how the template system works, and how to customize it.
Contents
- Why Templates Matter
- Template Selection Guide
- Template Structure Anatomy
- Template Details
- How
/blog writeUses Templates - Template and Scoring Integration
- Customization
- FAQ Section Guidelines (All Templates)
Why Templates Matter
Templates enforce the structural patterns that drive both Google rankings and AI citations. Without templates, content quality varies post to post, optimization elements get forgotten, and writing takes longer.
| Benefit | Impact | How |
|---|---|---|
| Consistent structure | Internal quality benchmark | Every post follows a proven section pattern |
| Faster writing | Internal workflow benchmark | Writer focuses on content, not structure |
| Complete optimization | All scoring elements included | Answer-first, visible Q&A, visuals, citations built into skeleton |
| Predictable output | Scoring 75+ without additional passes | Template alignment maps directly to scoring categories |
| Reduced revision cycles | Fewer review rounds needed | Structure issues caught at outline stage, not in review |
A well-followed template naturally produces content that scores 75+ on the
quality scoring checklist (see skills/blog/references/quality-scoring.md). Templates
do not constrain creativity: they ensure the structural foundations are
in place so the writer can focus on delivering unique value.
Template Selection Guide
Use this table to select the right template based on content goals.
| Goal | Template | Best For | Word Count |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teach a process | how-to-guide |
Step-by-step tutorials, "How to X" queries | 2,000-2,500 |
| Rank for "best X" | listicle |
Curated lists, "Best X for Y" queries | 1,500-2,000 |
| Build authority | case-study |
Proving results with real metrics | 2,000-3,000 |
| Capture comparison traffic | comparison |
"X vs Y" queries, tool evaluations | 1,500-2,000 |
| Dominate a topic | pillar-page |
Comprehensive coverage, hub pages | 3,000-4,000 |
| Convert buyers | product-review |
Bottom-of-funnel "is X worth it" queries | 1,500-2,500 |
| Thought leadership | thought-leadership |
Industry opinion, predictions, analysis | 2,000-3,000 |
| Curate expertise | roundup |
Expert quotes, multi-source collections | 2,000-2,500 |
| Technical audience | tutorial |
Code walkthroughs, tool demos | 2,500-3,500 |
| Timely content | news-analysis |
Event reactions, algorithm update coverage | 800-1,200 |
| Original research | data-research |
Proprietary data, survey results, experiments | 2,500-3,500 |
| Answer questions | faq-knowledge |
Knowledge base pages, Q&A reference content | 1,500-2,000 |
Search Intent Mapping
| Search Intent | Recommended Templates |
|---|---|
| Informational ("how to", "what is") | how-to-guide, tutorial, pillar-page |
| Commercial investigation ("best", "top", "vs") | listicle, comparison, product-review |
| Navigational (brand-specific) | product-review, case-study |
| Transactional ("buy", "pricing", "sign up") | product-review, comparison |
Template Structure Anatomy
Every template follows a consistent internal structure using markers that
guide the writer (and /blog write) on what content each section needs.
Section Markers
| Marker | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
[ANSWER-FIRST] |
Start with an about 50-word direct-answer sentence, then a 120-180 word citable passage with stat + source | "In 2026, [direct answer]. [Source-backed context follows]." |
[VISUAL: chart-type] |
Place a chart of the specified type here | [VISUAL: grouped-bar] for before/after data |
[IMAGE] |
Place a relevant image with descriptive alt text here | After H2 heading, before body text |
[INFO-GAIN: type] |
Section requires original data or unique perspective | [INFO-GAIN: case-study], [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] |
[STAT: description] |
A specific statistic is needed in this location | [STAT: market size or growth rate] |
[FAQ] |
Place the FAQ section (3-5 questions, 40-60 word answers) | Always before the conclusion |
[INTERNAL-LINK] |
Natural place for an internal link to related content | [INTERNAL-LINK: related pillar page or supporting post] |
Universal Template Skeleton
Every template, regardless of content type, follows this outer structure:
# [Title: Question Format with Primary Keyword]
## Introduction (100-150 words)
- Hook: [Surprising stat or counterintuitive finding]
- Problem/opportunity: [Why the reader should care]
- Promise: [What they'll learn by reading]
## H2: [Section: usually Question Format] (word count)
[ANSWER-FIRST]: about 50-word direct-answer sentence, then 120-180 word citable passage with stat + source
[CONTENT]: Topic coverage guidance
[INFO-GAIN]: Where unique perspective is needed
[VISUAL]: Chart type or [IMAGE] placement
[INTERNAL-LINK]: Where to link related content
[... 4-8 H2 sections depending on template ...]
## Frequently Asked Questions
[FAQ]: 3-5 questions with 40-60 word answers; include sourced stats only when they genuinely improve the answer
## Conclusion (100-150 words)
- Key takeaways (bulleted, 3-5 items)
- Call to action
Section Word Count Targets
Word count targets ensure proper pacing. Readers disengage when sections are too long, and AI systems prefer well-chunked content.
| Section Type | Target Word Count | Hard Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | 100-150 words | 200 words |
| Standard H2 section | 300-400 words | 500 words |
| Lightweight H2 section | 200-300 words | 400 words |
| Heavy H2 section (pillar) | 400-600 words | 700 words |
| FAQ answer (each) | 40-60 words | 80 words |
| Conclusion | 100-150 words | 200 words |
Template Details
how-to-guide
When to use: The reader wants to accomplish a specific task. The content walks them through a process with defined steps.
Structure:
Introduction (hook with difficulty/time stat)
H2: Why This Matters [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT]
H2: Prerequisites / What You Need
H2: Step 1 - [Action] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: Step 2 - [Action] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: process-flow]
H2: Step 3 - [Action] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: Common Mistakes to Avoid [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (key takeaways + next step)
Visual plan: Process flow chart + before/after comparison chart. 3-5 screenshots or relevant images, one per major step.
AI citation strength: High for "how to" queries. AI systems frequently extract step-by-step instructions from well-structured how-to content.
listicle
When to use: The reader is comparing options or looking for curated recommendations. Ranks well for "best X", "top X", "X tools for Y" queries.
Structure:
Introduction (hook with total count stat)
H2: [Item 1] - [Key Differentiator] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: [Item 2] - [Key Differentiator] [ANSWER-FIRST]
... (5-15 items depending on depth)
H2: How We Evaluated [Category] [INFO-GAIN: methodology]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (top pick + comparison table)
Visual plan: Comparison bar chart + market share donut chart. Logo/screenshot per item, or grouped comparison image.
AI citation strength: High, but vendor-reported listicle shares vary. AI systems often extract individual list items and recommendations.
case-study
When to use: Showcasing real results with specific metrics. Critical for E-E-A-T (demonstrates Experience) and thought leadership.
Structure:
Introduction (headline result stat)
H2: The Challenge [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT]
H2: The Approach / Solution [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: timeline]
H2: Implementation Details [INFO-GAIN: process-documentation] [IMAGE]
H2: Results [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: before-after-bar] [STAT]
H2: Key Takeaways [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (CTA to learn more)
Visual plan: Before/after bar chart + results timeline or line chart. Screenshots, dashboards, team/process photos.
AI citation strength: High for specific queries about outcomes and metrics. Case studies provide the exact type of original data AI cannot fabricate.
Critical requirement: Real metrics from the actual project. Without genuine data, this template produces content that fails E-E-A-T evaluation.
comparison
When to use: "X vs Y" evaluations, tool comparisons, and "alternative to X" queries. These capture high-intent commercial traffic.
Structure:
Introduction (market context stat)
H2: Quick Comparison Table [STAT]
H2: [Product A] Overview [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: [Product B] Overview [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: Feature-by-Feature Comparison [VISUAL: radar-chart]
H2: Pricing Comparison [VISUAL: bar-chart] [STAT]
H2: Which Should You Choose? [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (recommendation matrix)
Visual plan: Feature comparison radar chart + pricing bar chart. Product screenshots and UI comparisons.
AI citation strength: Very high for commercial queries. AI systems frequently cite comparison content when users ask "which is better."
pillar-page
When to use: Comprehensive guides that serve as hub pages for topic clusters. The anchor content that supporting posts link back to.
Structure:
Introduction (scope + authority stat)
H2: What Is [Topic]? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT]
H2: Why [Topic] Matters in 2026 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: trend-line]
H2: [Core Subtopic 1] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: [Core Subtopic 2] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: bar-chart] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: [Core Subtopic 3] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: [Core Subtopic 4] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: donut-chart]
H2: [Advanced Topic] [INFO-GAIN: expert-insight] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: Tools and Resources [STAT]
H2: FAQ [FAQ] (5-8 items: more than standard)
Conclusion (learning path + next steps)
Visual plan: 3-4 charts (diverse types) + topic overview diagram. 5+ images distributed throughout.
Internal linking: Heavy. Every subtopic H2 should link to a supporting blog post. This is the hub of a topic cluster.
AI citation strength: Highest when the page covers a topic comprehensively and provides source-backed passages. Treat vendor claims about long-form AI citation lift as directional unless the cited study is loaded and verified.
product-review
When to use: Hands-on tool reviews with real testing results. Bottom-of- funnel content for users deciding whether to buy/use a product.
Structure:
Introduction (verdict stat, e.g., performance score)
H2: Quick Verdict [ANSWER-FIRST]
H2: What Is [Product]? [STAT]
H2: Setup and First Impressions [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] [IMAGE]
H2: Key Features Tested [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: Performance Results [VISUAL: benchmark-bar] [STAT]
H2: Pricing and Value [VISUAL: pricing-comparison] [STAT]
H2: Pros and Cons
H2: Who Is This For?
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (final rating + recommendation)
Visual plan: Performance benchmark chart + pricing comparison. Screenshots from actual testing (critical for E-E-A-T).
Critical requirement: First-hand testing data. Product reviews without genuine hands-on experience are exposed to quality and spam enforcement risk. Treat third-party affiliate visibility-loss figures as methodology-limited context.
thought-leadership
When to use: Industry analysis, forward-looking opinion pieces, and contrarian takes backed by data. Builds authority and attracts backlinks.
Structure:
Introduction (trend stat that sets the stage)
H2: What Changed in [Topic] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: trend-line] [STAT]
H2: What's Changing [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT]
H2: Why This Matters [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: What I've Seen [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience]
H2: What to Do About It [ANSWER-FIRST] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: Looking Ahead [INFO-GAIN: predictions]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (key thesis + call to action)
Visual plan: Trend line chart + market shift chart.
Differentiator: Personal perspective and predictions are the entire value proposition. AI cannot replicate genuine opinions from experienced practitioners.
roundup
When to use: Collecting insights from multiple sources or experts. Curated content that synthesizes perspectives across the industry.
Structure:
Introduction (theme + number of sources stat)
H2: Key Finding 1 [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT]
H2: Key Finding 2 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: multi-source-comparison]
H2: Key Finding 3 [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: Expert Perspectives [INFO-GAIN: expert-interviews]
H2: What This Means for [Audience] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (synthesis + action items)
Visual plan: Multi-source comparison chart + trend aggregation.
tutorial
When to use: Technical walkthroughs with code examples. The reader wants to build something specific using specific tools.
Structure:
Introduction (what you'll build + tech stack)
H2: Prerequisites and Setup [STAT]
H2: Step 1 - [Foundation] [ANSWER-FIRST] [code-blocks]
H2: Step 2 - [Core Feature] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] [code-blocks]
H2: Step 3 - [Integration] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: architecture-diagram]
H2: Step 4 - [Testing/Deployment] [ANSWER-FIRST] [code-blocks]
H2: Troubleshooting Common Issues [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (complete code repo link + extensions)
Visual plan: Architecture diagram (SVG) + performance chart. Terminal screenshots and UI results.
Special considerations: Code blocks with syntax highlighting throughout. Every code example must be tested and runnable. Outdated code destroys credibility and E-E-A-T trust.
news-analysis
When to use: Timely commentary on industry events, algorithm updates, and announcements. Speed matters: publish within 24-48 hours.
Structure:
Introduction (the news + impact stat)
H2: What Happened [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT]
H2: Why It Matters [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: impact-chart]
H2: Who's Affected [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE]
H2: What to Do Now [ANSWER-FIRST] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: FAQ [FAQ] (2-3 items)
Conclusion (outlook)
Visual plan: 1-2 charts (impact visualization). Lighter on visuals because speed of publication is the priority.
Word count: 800-1,200 words. Shorter format because timeliness is the primary value. Update with additional data as it becomes available.
data-research
When to use: Original research, surveys, proprietary data analysis. The highest-value content type for building authority and earning citations.
Structure:
Introduction (headline finding)
H2: Methodology [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT: sample-size]
H2: Key Finding 1 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: primary-data-chart] [STAT]
H2: Key Finding 2 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: secondary-data-chart] [STAT]
H2: Key Finding 3 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: comparison-chart] [STAT]
H2: Implications [ANSWER-FIRST] [INTERNAL-LINK]
H2: Limitations [INFO-GAIN: methodology-transparency]
H2: FAQ [FAQ]
Conclusion (summary of findings + data access)
Visual plan: 3-4 charts (data visualizations are central to this type). Charts ARE the content: they should be the primary focus of each finding section.
Differentiator: Original data is the entire value proposition. B2B SaaS websites conducting original research saw 25.1% average increase in top-10 rankings (Stratabeat study). AI cannot create proprietary data.
faq-knowledge
When to use: Comprehensive Q&A reference content. Knowledge base pages that answer many related questions about a topic.
Structure:
Introduction (topic scope + common questions stat)
H2: [Category 1] Questions
H3: Question 1? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful]
H3: Question 2? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful]
H2: [Category 2] Questions
H3: Question 3? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful]
H3: Question 4? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful]
H2: [Category 3] Questions [VISUAL: summary-chart]
H3: Question 5? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful]
H3: Question 6? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful]
Conclusion (additional resources + [INTERNAL-LINK])
Visual plan: 1-2 summary charts. Lighter on visuals because the Q&A structure itself provides the value.
Special requirements: Every factual claim must be verifiable. Use sourced statistics when they clarify the answer; do not force numbers into qualitative answers. FAQPage schema is optional entity markup for visible Q&A. It does not generate Google rich results or known SERP features; use it only to clarify question and answer entities for AI citation support.
How /blog write Uses Templates
Auto-Detection Logic
When the user invokes /blog write [topic] without specifying a content type,
the system analyzes the topic to select the best template:
| Topic Signal | Template Selected |
|---|---|
| "How to...", "Guide to...", "Steps to..." | how-to-guide |
| Numbers in title ("10 Best...", "7 Ways...", "Top 5...") | listicle |
| "X vs Y", "compared", "alternative to" | comparison |
| "Review", "tested", "hands-on", "our experience with" | product-review |
| Company/project name + "results", "case study" | case-study |
| Broad topic, "complete guide", "everything about", "ultimate" | pillar-page |
| "Tutorial", "walkthrough", "build", "implement" | tutorial |
| News event, "update", "announcement", "just released" | news-analysis |
| "Survey", "study", "data", "research", "we analyzed" | data-research |
| "FAQ", "questions about", "answers to" | faq-knowledge |
| Industry trend, "prediction", "future of", "why I think" | thought-leadership |
| "Experts say", "roundup", "collection", "what X think" | roundup |
Explicit User Selection
Users can specify the template directly:
/blog write case study: Acme Corp migration results
/blog write listicle: "10 Best CI/CD Tools for 2026"
/blog write tutorial: "Building a RAG Pipeline with LangChain"
Default Behavior
If the topic is ambiguous and auto-detection is uncertain:
- Informational intent: Defaults to
how-to-guide(most versatile) - Commercial intent: Defaults to
comparison - The system confirms the template selection with the user before proceeding
Template and Scoring Integration
Templates guide content creation; the scoring system validates the result. Here is how template features map to scoring categories:
| Template Feature | Scoring Category | Points at Stake |
|---|---|---|
| Section structure, originality, readability, engagement | Content Quality | 30 pts |
| Heading hierarchy, title, meta, keyword use, internal links | SEO Optimization | 25 pts |
[INFO-GAIN], author signals, citations, trust markers |
E-E-A-T Signals | 15 pts |
[VISUAL], [IMAGE], schema, performance, OG metadata |
Technical Elements | 15 pts |
[ANSWER-FIRST], Q&A passages, entity clarity, crawlability |
AI Citation Readiness | 15 pts |
A content piece that follows its template structure has coverage for the 100-point rubric. Final scoring still depends on evidence quality, originality, and execution.
Customization
Modifying an Existing Template
Templates are editable markdown files in the installed skill at
~/.claude/skills/blog/templates/ or in this repo at skills/blog/templates/.
Changes take effect immediately: no restart needed.
- Open the template file you want to modify
- Adjust section structure, word count targets, or marker placement
- Test by running
/blog writewith a topic that matches the template
Creating a New Template
Copy an existing template as a starting point:
cp skills/blog/templates/how-to-guide.md \ skills/blog/templates/my-custom-type.mdDefine the section structure for your content type:
- How many H2 sections does this type naturally have?
- What is the logical flow from introduction to conclusion?
- Where do visuals add the most value?
Add markers to every section:
[ANSWER-FIRST]on every H2 (non-negotiable)[VISUAL]or[IMAGE]on 60-70% of H2 sections[INFO-GAIN]on sections that need original perspective[STAT]where specific data points are essential[INTERNAL-LINK]where related content connections are natural
Set word count targets that match the content type's natural depth
Add a topic signal entry to the auto-detection table (update the blog-write SKILL.md or document the detection keywords)
Template Best Practices
| Practice | Why |
|---|---|
| Keep sections focused on one topic each | AI systems extract by section |
Place [VISUAL] where data naturally supports a chart |
Forced visuals feel awkward |
Use [INFO-GAIN] liberally |
These sections differentiate from AI consensus |
| Set realistic word counts | Over-padding dilutes quality scores |
Always include [FAQ] zone and conclusion |
Both are scoring elements |
Test with /blog analyze after writing |
Validates template effectiveness |
FAQ Section Guidelines (All Templates)
Every template includes a visible Q&A section. It supports engagement and may aid AI citation as an entity signal. It is not a Google rich result.
FAQ Requirements
| Requirement | Specification |
|---|---|
| Minimum questions | 3 (standard templates), 5-8 (pillar-page, faq-knowledge) |
| Maximum questions | 8 (diminishing returns beyond this) |
| Answer length | 40-60 words each |
| Statistics | Include only when factual, relevant, and sourced |
| Source attribution | Every statistic must cite a named source |
| Schema | Generate FAQPage only when FAQ content is visible; never present it as a Google rich result; keep Article + Person + Organization + BreadcrumbList as the 2026 priority |
FAQ Question Sources
- People Also Ask results for the target keyword
- Reddit threads asking about the topic
- Common objections or misconceptions
- "How much", "how long", "is it worth" questions
- Questions that the main article sections do not fully address
| 1 | # Content Type Template Reference |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Index and guide to the 12 content templates in `templates/`. These |
| 4 | templates are structural blueprints that `/blog write` uses to generate |
| 5 | consistently optimized content. This reference explains when to use each |
| 6 | template, how the template system works, and how to customize it. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | ## Contents |
| 9 | |
| 10 | [Why Templates Matter] |
| 11 | [Template Selection Guide] |
| 12 | [Template Structure Anatomy] |
| 13 | [Template Details] |
| 14 | [How `/blog write` Uses Templates] |
| 15 | [Template and Scoring Integration] |
| 16 | [Customization] |
| 17 | [FAQ Section Guidelines (All Templates)] |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | ## Why Templates Matter |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Templates enforce the structural patterns that drive both Google rankings |
| 24 | and AI citations. Without templates, content quality varies post to post, |
| 25 | optimization elements get forgotten, and writing takes longer. |
| 26 | |
| 27 | | Benefit | Impact | How | |
| 28 | |---------|--------|-----| |
| 29 | | Consistent structure | Internal quality benchmark | Every post follows a proven section pattern | |
| 30 | | Faster writing | Internal workflow benchmark | Writer focuses on content, not structure | |
| 31 | | Complete optimization | All scoring elements included | Answer-first, visible Q&A, visuals, citations built into skeleton | |
| 32 | | Predictable output | Scoring 75+ without additional passes | Template alignment maps directly to scoring categories | |
| 33 | | Reduced revision cycles | Fewer review rounds needed | Structure issues caught at outline stage, not in review | |
| 34 | |
| 35 | A well-followed template naturally produces content that scores 75+ on the |
| 36 | quality scoring checklist (see `skills/blog/references/quality-scoring.md`). Templates |
| 37 | do not constrain creativity: they ensure the structural foundations are |
| 38 | in place so the writer can focus on delivering unique value. |
| 39 | |
| 40 | |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ## Template Selection Guide |
| 43 | |
| 44 | Use this table to select the right template based on content goals. |
| 45 | |
| 46 | | Goal | Template | Best For | Word Count | |
| 47 | |------|----------|----------|------------| |
| 48 | | Teach a process | `how-to-guide` | Step-by-step tutorials, "How to X" queries | 2,000-2,500 | |
| 49 | | Rank for "best X" | `listicle` | Curated lists, "Best X for Y" queries | 1,500-2,000 | |
| 50 | | Build authority | `case-study` | Proving results with real metrics | 2,000-3,000 | |
| 51 | | Capture comparison traffic | `comparison` | "X vs Y" queries, tool evaluations | 1,500-2,000 | |
| 52 | | Dominate a topic | `pillar-page` | Comprehensive coverage, hub pages | 3,000-4,000 | |
| 53 | | Convert buyers | `product-review` | Bottom-of-funnel "is X worth it" queries | 1,500-2,500 | |
| 54 | | Thought leadership | `thought-leadership` | Industry opinion, predictions, analysis | 2,000-3,000 | |
| 55 | | Curate expertise | `roundup` | Expert quotes, multi-source collections | 2,000-2,500 | |
| 56 | | Technical audience | `tutorial` | Code walkthroughs, tool demos | 2,500-3,500 | |
| 57 | | Timely content | `news-analysis` | Event reactions, algorithm update coverage | 800-1,200 | |
| 58 | | Original research | `data-research` | Proprietary data, survey results, experiments | 2,500-3,500 | |
| 59 | | Answer questions | `faq-knowledge` | Knowledge base pages, Q&A reference content | 1,500-2,000 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ### Search Intent Mapping |
| 62 | |
| 63 | | Search Intent | Recommended Templates | |
| 64 | |--------------|----------------------| |
| 65 | | Informational ("how to", "what is") | how-to-guide, tutorial, pillar-page | |
| 66 | | Commercial investigation ("best", "top", "vs") | listicle, comparison, product-review | |
| 67 | | Navigational (brand-specific) | product-review, case-study | |
| 68 | | Transactional ("buy", "pricing", "sign up") | product-review, comparison | |
| 69 | |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 72 | ## Template Structure Anatomy |
| 73 | |
| 74 | Every template follows a consistent internal structure using markers that |
| 75 | guide the writer (and `/blog write`) on what content each section needs. |
| 76 | |
| 77 | ### Section Markers |
| 78 | |
| 79 | | Marker | Purpose | Example | |
| 80 | |--------|---------|---------| |
| 81 | | `[ANSWER-FIRST]` | Start with an about 50-word direct-answer sentence, then a 120-180 word citable passage with stat + source | "In 2026, [direct answer]. [Source-backed context follows]." | |
| 82 | | `[VISUAL: chart-type]` | Place a chart of the specified type here | `[VISUAL: grouped-bar]` for before/after data | |
| 83 | | `[IMAGE]` | Place a relevant image with descriptive alt text here | After H2 heading, before body text | |
| 84 | | `[INFO-GAIN: type]` | Section requires original data or unique perspective | `[INFO-GAIN: case-study]`, `[INFO-GAIN: personal-experience]` | |
| 85 | | `[STAT: description]` | A specific statistic is needed in this location | `[STAT: market size or growth rate]` | |
| 86 | | `[FAQ]` | Place the FAQ section (3-5 questions, 40-60 word answers) | Always before the conclusion | |
| 87 | | `[INTERNAL-LINK]` | Natural place for an internal link to related content | `[INTERNAL-LINK: related pillar page or supporting post]` | |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ### Universal Template Skeleton |
| 90 | |
| 91 | Every template, regardless of content type, follows this outer structure: |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | # [Title: Question Format with Primary Keyword] |
| 95 | |
| 96 | ## Introduction (100-150 words) |
| 97 | - Hook: [Surprising stat or counterintuitive finding] |
| 98 | - Problem/opportunity: [Why the reader should care] |
| 99 | - Promise: [What they'll learn by reading] |
| 100 | |
| 101 | ## H2: [Section: usually Question Format] (word count) |
| 102 | [ANSWER-FIRST]: about 50-word direct-answer sentence, then 120-180 word citable passage with stat + source |
| 103 | [CONTENT]: Topic coverage guidance |
| 104 | [INFO-GAIN]: Where unique perspective is needed |
| 105 | [VISUAL]: Chart type or [IMAGE] placement |
| 106 | [INTERNAL-LINK]: Where to link related content |
| 107 | |
| 108 | [... 4-8 H2 sections depending on template ...] |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ## Frequently Asked Questions |
| 111 | [FAQ]: 3-5 questions with 40-60 word answers; include sourced stats only when they genuinely improve the answer |
| 112 | |
| 113 | ## Conclusion (100-150 words) |
| 114 | - Key takeaways (bulleted, 3-5 items) |
| 115 | - Call to action |
| 116 | |
| 117 | |
| 118 | ### Section Word Count Targets |
| 119 | |
| 120 | Word count targets ensure proper pacing. Readers disengage when sections |
| 121 | are too long, and AI systems prefer well-chunked content. |
| 122 | |
| 123 | | Section Type | Target Word Count | Hard Limit | |
| 124 | |-------------|-------------------|------------| |
| 125 | | Introduction | 100-150 words | 200 words | |
| 126 | | Standard H2 section | 300-400 words | 500 words | |
| 127 | | Lightweight H2 section | 200-300 words | 400 words | |
| 128 | | Heavy H2 section (pillar) | 400-600 words | 700 words | |
| 129 | | FAQ answer (each) | 40-60 words | 80 words | |
| 130 | | Conclusion | 100-150 words | 200 words | |
| 131 | |
| 132 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | ## Template Details |
| 135 | |
| 136 | ### how-to-guide |
| 137 | |
| 138 | **When to use**: The reader wants to accomplish a specific task. The content |
| 139 | walks them through a process with defined steps. |
| 140 | |
| 141 | **Structure**: |
| 142 | |
| 143 | Introduction (hook with difficulty/time stat) |
| 144 | H2: Why This Matters [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT] |
| 145 | H2: Prerequisites / What You Need |
| 146 | H2: Step 1 - [Action] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 147 | H2: Step 2 - [Action] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: process-flow] |
| 148 | H2: Step 3 - [Action] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 149 | H2: Common Mistakes to Avoid [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] |
| 150 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 151 | Conclusion (key takeaways + next step) |
| 152 | |
| 153 | |
| 154 | **Visual plan**: Process flow chart + before/after comparison chart. |
| 155 | 3-5 screenshots or relevant images, one per major step. |
| 156 | |
| 157 | **AI citation strength**: High for "how to" queries. AI systems frequently |
| 158 | extract step-by-step instructions from well-structured how-to content. |
| 159 | |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 162 | ### listicle |
| 163 | |
| 164 | **When to use**: The reader is comparing options or looking for curated |
| 165 | recommendations. Ranks well for "best X", "top X", "X tools for Y" queries. |
| 166 | |
| 167 | **Structure**: |
| 168 | |
| 169 | Introduction (hook with total count stat) |
| 170 | H2: [Item 1] - [Key Differentiator] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 171 | H2: [Item 2] - [Key Differentiator] [ANSWER-FIRST] |
| 172 | ... (5-15 items depending on depth) |
| 173 | H2: How We Evaluated [Category] [INFO-GAIN: methodology] |
| 174 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 175 | Conclusion (top pick + comparison table) |
| 176 | |
| 177 | |
| 178 | **Visual plan**: Comparison bar chart + market share donut chart. |
| 179 | Logo/screenshot per item, or grouped comparison image. |
| 180 | |
| 181 | **AI citation strength**: High, but vendor-reported listicle shares vary. |
| 182 | AI systems often extract individual list items and recommendations. |
| 183 | |
| 184 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | ### case-study |
| 187 | |
| 188 | **When to use**: Showcasing real results with specific metrics. Critical for |
| 189 | E-E-A-T (demonstrates Experience) and thought leadership. |
| 190 | |
| 191 | **Structure**: |
| 192 | |
| 193 | Introduction (headline result stat) |
| 194 | H2: The Challenge [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT] |
| 195 | H2: The Approach / Solution [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: timeline] |
| 196 | H2: Implementation Details [INFO-GAIN: process-documentation] [IMAGE] |
| 197 | H2: Results [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: before-after-bar] [STAT] |
| 198 | H2: Key Takeaways [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 199 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 200 | Conclusion (CTA to learn more) |
| 201 | |
| 202 | |
| 203 | **Visual plan**: Before/after bar chart + results timeline or line chart. |
| 204 | Screenshots, dashboards, team/process photos. |
| 205 | |
| 206 | **AI citation strength**: High for specific queries about outcomes and metrics. |
| 207 | Case studies provide the exact type of original data AI cannot fabricate. |
| 208 | |
| 209 | **Critical requirement**: Real metrics from the actual project. Without genuine |
| 210 | data, this template produces content that fails E-E-A-T evaluation. |
| 211 | |
| 212 | |
| 213 | |
| 214 | ### comparison |
| 215 | |
| 216 | **When to use**: "X vs Y" evaluations, tool comparisons, and "alternative to X" |
| 217 | queries. These capture high-intent commercial traffic. |
| 218 | |
| 219 | **Structure**: |
| 220 | |
| 221 | Introduction (market context stat) |
| 222 | H2: Quick Comparison Table [STAT] |
| 223 | H2: [Product A] Overview [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 224 | H2: [Product B] Overview [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 225 | H2: Feature-by-Feature Comparison [VISUAL: radar-chart] |
| 226 | H2: Pricing Comparison [VISUAL: bar-chart] [STAT] |
| 227 | H2: Which Should You Choose? [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] |
| 228 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 229 | Conclusion (recommendation matrix) |
| 230 | |
| 231 | |
| 232 | **Visual plan**: Feature comparison radar chart + pricing bar chart. |
| 233 | Product screenshots and UI comparisons. |
| 234 | |
| 235 | **AI citation strength**: Very high for commercial queries. AI systems |
| 236 | frequently cite comparison content when users ask "which is better." |
| 237 | |
| 238 | |
| 239 | |
| 240 | ### pillar-page |
| 241 | |
| 242 | **When to use**: Comprehensive guides that serve as hub pages for topic |
| 243 | clusters. The anchor content that supporting posts link back to. |
| 244 | |
| 245 | **Structure**: |
| 246 | |
| 247 | Introduction (scope + authority stat) |
| 248 | H2: What Is [Topic]? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT] |
| 249 | H2: Why [Topic] Matters in 2026 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: trend-line] |
| 250 | H2: [Core Subtopic 1] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 251 | H2: [Core Subtopic 2] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: bar-chart] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 252 | H2: [Core Subtopic 3] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 253 | H2: [Core Subtopic 4] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: donut-chart] |
| 254 | H2: [Advanced Topic] [INFO-GAIN: expert-insight] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 255 | H2: Tools and Resources [STAT] |
| 256 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] (5-8 items: more than standard) |
| 257 | Conclusion (learning path + next steps) |
| 258 | |
| 259 | |
| 260 | **Visual plan**: 3-4 charts (diverse types) + topic overview diagram. |
| 261 | 5+ images distributed throughout. |
| 262 | |
| 263 | **Internal linking**: Heavy. Every subtopic H2 should link to a supporting |
| 264 | blog post. This is the hub of a topic cluster. |
| 265 | |
| 266 | **AI citation strength**: Highest when the page covers a topic comprehensively |
| 267 | and provides source-backed passages. Treat vendor claims about long-form AI |
| 268 | citation lift as directional unless the cited study is loaded and verified. |
| 269 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 272 | ### product-review |
| 273 | |
| 274 | **When to use**: Hands-on tool reviews with real testing results. Bottom-of- |
| 275 | funnel content for users deciding whether to buy/use a product. |
| 276 | |
| 277 | **Structure**: |
| 278 | |
| 279 | Introduction (verdict stat, e.g., performance score) |
| 280 | H2: Quick Verdict [ANSWER-FIRST] |
| 281 | H2: What Is [Product]? [STAT] |
| 282 | H2: Setup and First Impressions [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] [IMAGE] |
| 283 | H2: Key Features Tested [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 284 | H2: Performance Results [VISUAL: benchmark-bar] [STAT] |
| 285 | H2: Pricing and Value [VISUAL: pricing-comparison] [STAT] |
| 286 | H2: Pros and Cons |
| 287 | H2: Who Is This For? |
| 288 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 289 | Conclusion (final rating + recommendation) |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | **Visual plan**: Performance benchmark chart + pricing comparison. |
| 293 | Screenshots from actual testing (critical for E-E-A-T). |
| 294 | |
| 295 | **Critical requirement**: First-hand testing data. Product reviews without |
| 296 | genuine hands-on experience are exposed to quality and spam enforcement risk. |
| 297 | Treat third-party affiliate visibility-loss figures as methodology-limited context. |
| 298 | |
| 299 | |
| 300 | |
| 301 | ### thought-leadership |
| 302 | |
| 303 | **When to use**: Industry analysis, forward-looking opinion pieces, and |
| 304 | contrarian takes backed by data. Builds authority and attracts backlinks. |
| 305 | |
| 306 | **Structure**: |
| 307 | |
| 308 | Introduction (trend stat that sets the stage) |
| 309 | H2: What Changed in [Topic] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: trend-line] [STAT] |
| 310 | H2: What's Changing [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT] |
| 311 | H2: Why This Matters [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 312 | H2: What I've Seen [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] |
| 313 | H2: What to Do About It [ANSWER-FIRST] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 314 | H2: Looking Ahead [INFO-GAIN: predictions] |
| 315 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 316 | Conclusion (key thesis + call to action) |
| 317 | |
| 318 | |
| 319 | **Visual plan**: Trend line chart + market shift chart. |
| 320 | |
| 321 | **Differentiator**: Personal perspective and predictions are the entire value |
| 322 | proposition. AI cannot replicate genuine opinions from experienced practitioners. |
| 323 | |
| 324 | |
| 325 | |
| 326 | ### roundup |
| 327 | |
| 328 | **When to use**: Collecting insights from multiple sources or experts. Curated |
| 329 | content that synthesizes perspectives across the industry. |
| 330 | |
| 331 | **Structure**: |
| 332 | |
| 333 | Introduction (theme + number of sources stat) |
| 334 | H2: Key Finding 1 [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT] |
| 335 | H2: Key Finding 2 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: multi-source-comparison] |
| 336 | H2: Key Finding 3 [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 337 | H2: Expert Perspectives [INFO-GAIN: expert-interviews] |
| 338 | H2: What This Means for [Audience] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 339 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 340 | Conclusion (synthesis + action items) |
| 341 | |
| 342 | |
| 343 | **Visual plan**: Multi-source comparison chart + trend aggregation. |
| 344 | |
| 345 | |
| 346 | |
| 347 | ### tutorial |
| 348 | |
| 349 | **When to use**: Technical walkthroughs with code examples. The reader wants |
| 350 | to build something specific using specific tools. |
| 351 | |
| 352 | **Structure**: |
| 353 | |
| 354 | Introduction (what you'll build + tech stack) |
| 355 | H2: Prerequisites and Setup [STAT] |
| 356 | H2: Step 1 - [Foundation] [ANSWER-FIRST] [code-blocks] |
| 357 | H2: Step 2 - [Core Feature] [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] [code-blocks] |
| 358 | H2: Step 3 - [Integration] [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: architecture-diagram] |
| 359 | H2: Step 4 - [Testing/Deployment] [ANSWER-FIRST] [code-blocks] |
| 360 | H2: Troubleshooting Common Issues [INFO-GAIN: personal-experience] |
| 361 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 362 | Conclusion (complete code repo link + extensions) |
| 363 | |
| 364 | |
| 365 | **Visual plan**: Architecture diagram (SVG) + performance chart. |
| 366 | Terminal screenshots and UI results. |
| 367 | |
| 368 | **Special considerations**: Code blocks with syntax highlighting throughout. |
| 369 | Every code example must be tested and runnable. Outdated code destroys |
| 370 | credibility and E-E-A-T trust. |
| 371 | |
| 372 | |
| 373 | |
| 374 | ### news-analysis |
| 375 | |
| 376 | **When to use**: Timely commentary on industry events, algorithm updates, |
| 377 | and announcements. Speed matters: publish within 24-48 hours. |
| 378 | |
| 379 | **Structure**: |
| 380 | |
| 381 | Introduction (the news + impact stat) |
| 382 | H2: What Happened [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT] |
| 383 | H2: Why It Matters [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: impact-chart] |
| 384 | H2: Who's Affected [ANSWER-FIRST] [IMAGE] |
| 385 | H2: What to Do Now [ANSWER-FIRST] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 386 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] (2-3 items) |
| 387 | Conclusion (outlook) |
| 388 | |
| 389 | |
| 390 | **Visual plan**: 1-2 charts (impact visualization). Lighter on visuals |
| 391 | because speed of publication is the priority. |
| 392 | |
| 393 | **Word count**: 800-1,200 words. Shorter format because timeliness is the |
| 394 | primary value. Update with additional data as it becomes available. |
| 395 | |
| 396 | |
| 397 | |
| 398 | ### data-research |
| 399 | |
| 400 | **When to use**: Original research, surveys, proprietary data analysis. |
| 401 | The highest-value content type for building authority and earning citations. |
| 402 | |
| 403 | **Structure**: |
| 404 | |
| 405 | Introduction (headline finding) |
| 406 | H2: Methodology [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT: sample-size] |
| 407 | H2: Key Finding 1 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: primary-data-chart] [STAT] |
| 408 | H2: Key Finding 2 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: secondary-data-chart] [STAT] |
| 409 | H2: Key Finding 3 [ANSWER-FIRST] [VISUAL: comparison-chart] [STAT] |
| 410 | H2: Implications [ANSWER-FIRST] [INTERNAL-LINK] |
| 411 | H2: Limitations [INFO-GAIN: methodology-transparency] |
| 412 | H2: FAQ [FAQ] |
| 413 | Conclusion (summary of findings + data access) |
| 414 | |
| 415 | |
| 416 | **Visual plan**: 3-4 charts (data visualizations are central to this type). |
| 417 | Charts ARE the content: they should be the primary focus of each finding section. |
| 418 | |
| 419 | **Differentiator**: Original data is the entire value proposition. B2B SaaS |
| 420 | websites conducting original research saw 25.1% average increase in top-10 |
| 421 | rankings (Stratabeat study). AI cannot create proprietary data. |
| 422 | |
| 423 | |
| 424 | |
| 425 | ### faq-knowledge |
| 426 | |
| 427 | **When to use**: Comprehensive Q&A reference content. Knowledge base pages |
| 428 | that answer many related questions about a topic. |
| 429 | |
| 430 | **Structure**: |
| 431 | |
| 432 | Introduction (topic scope + common questions stat) |
| 433 | H2: [Category 1] Questions |
| 434 | H3: Question 1? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful] |
| 435 | H3: Question 2? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful] |
| 436 | H2: [Category 2] Questions |
| 437 | H3: Question 3? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful] |
| 438 | H3: Question 4? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful] |
| 439 | H2: [Category 3] Questions [VISUAL: summary-chart] |
| 440 | H3: Question 5? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful] |
| 441 | H3: Question 6? [ANSWER-FIRST] [STAT when useful] |
| 442 | Conclusion (additional resources + [INTERNAL-LINK]) |
| 443 | |
| 444 | |
| 445 | **Visual plan**: 1-2 summary charts. Lighter on visuals because the Q&A |
| 446 | structure itself provides the value. |
| 447 | |
| 448 | **Special requirements**: Every factual claim must be verifiable. Use sourced |
| 449 | statistics when they clarify the answer; do not force numbers into qualitative |
| 450 | answers. |
| 451 | FAQPage schema is optional entity markup for visible Q&A. It does not generate |
| 452 | Google rich results or known SERP features; use it only to clarify question and |
| 453 | answer entities for AI citation support. |
| 454 | |
| 455 | |
| 456 | |
| 457 | ## How `/blog write` Uses Templates |
| 458 | |
| 459 | ### Auto-Detection Logic |
| 460 | |
| 461 | When the user invokes `/blog write [topic]` without specifying a content type, |
| 462 | the system analyzes the topic to select the best template: |
| 463 | |
| 464 | | Topic Signal | Template Selected | |
| 465 | |-------------|-------------------| |
| 466 | | "How to...", "Guide to...", "Steps to..." | how-to-guide | |
| 467 | | Numbers in title ("10 Best...", "7 Ways...", "Top 5...") | listicle | |
| 468 | | "X vs Y", "compared", "alternative to" | comparison | |
| 469 | | "Review", "tested", "hands-on", "our experience with" | product-review | |
| 470 | | Company/project name + "results", "case study" | case-study | |
| 471 | | Broad topic, "complete guide", "everything about", "ultimate" | pillar-page | |
| 472 | | "Tutorial", "walkthrough", "build", "implement" | tutorial | |
| 473 | | News event, "update", "announcement", "just released" | news-analysis | |
| 474 | | "Survey", "study", "data", "research", "we analyzed" | data-research | |
| 475 | | "FAQ", "questions about", "answers to" | faq-knowledge | |
| 476 | | Industry trend, "prediction", "future of", "why I think" | thought-leadership | |
| 477 | | "Experts say", "roundup", "collection", "what X think" | roundup | |
| 478 | |
| 479 | ### Explicit User Selection |
| 480 | |
| 481 | Users can specify the template directly: |
| 482 | |
| 483 | /blog write case study: Acme Corp migration results |
| 484 | /blog write listicle: "10 Best CI/CD Tools for 2026" |
| 485 | /blog write tutorial: "Building a RAG Pipeline with LangChain" |
| 486 | |
| 487 | |
| 488 | ### Default Behavior |
| 489 | |
| 490 | If the topic is ambiguous and auto-detection is uncertain: |
| 491 | **Informational intent**: Defaults to `how-to-guide` (most versatile) |
| 492 | **Commercial intent**: Defaults to `comparison` |
| 493 | The system confirms the template selection with the user before proceeding |
| 494 | |
| 495 | |
| 496 | |
| 497 | ## Template and Scoring Integration |
| 498 | |
| 499 | Templates guide content creation; the scoring system validates the result. |
| 500 | Here is how template features map to scoring categories: |
| 501 | |
| 502 | | Template Feature | Scoring Category | Points at Stake | |
| 503 | |-----------------|------------------|-----------------| |
| 504 | | Section structure, originality, readability, engagement | Content Quality | 30 pts | |
| 505 | | Heading hierarchy, title, meta, keyword use, internal links | SEO Optimization | 25 pts | |
| 506 | | `[INFO-GAIN]`, author signals, citations, trust markers | E-E-A-T Signals | 15 pts | |
| 507 | | `[VISUAL]`, `[IMAGE]`, schema, performance, OG metadata | Technical Elements | 15 pts | |
| 508 | | `[ANSWER-FIRST]`, Q&A passages, entity clarity, crawlability | AI Citation Readiness | 15 pts | |
| 509 | |
| 510 | A content piece that follows its template structure has coverage for the 100-point |
| 511 | rubric. Final scoring still depends on evidence quality, originality, and execution. |
| 512 | |
| 513 | |
| 514 | |
| 515 | ## Customization |
| 516 | |
| 517 | ### Modifying an Existing Template |
| 518 | |
| 519 | Templates are editable markdown files in the installed skill at |
| 520 | `~/.claude/skills/blog/templates/` or in this repo at `skills/blog/templates/`. |
| 521 | Changes take effect immediately: no restart needed. |
| 522 | |
| 523 | Open the template file you want to modify |
| 524 | Adjust section structure, word count targets, or marker placement |
| 525 | Test by running `/blog write` with a topic that matches the template |
| 526 | |
| 527 | ### Creating a New Template |
| 528 | |
| 529 | Copy an existing template as a starting point: |
| 530 | |
| 531 | cp skills/blog/templates/how-to-guide.md \ |
| 532 | skills/blog/templates/my-custom-type.md |
| 533 | |
| 534 | |
| 535 | Define the section structure for your content type: |
| 536 | How many H2 sections does this type naturally have? |
| 537 | What is the logical flow from introduction to conclusion? |
| 538 | Where do visuals add the most value? |
| 539 | |
| 540 | Add markers to every section: |
| 541 | `[ANSWER-FIRST]` on every H2 (non-negotiable) |
| 542 | `[VISUAL]` or `[IMAGE]` on 60-70% of H2 sections |
| 543 | `[INFO-GAIN]` on sections that need original perspective |
| 544 | `[STAT]` where specific data points are essential |
| 545 | `[INTERNAL-LINK]` where related content connections are natural |
| 546 | |
| 547 | Set word count targets that match the content type's natural depth |
| 548 | |
| 549 | Add a topic signal entry to the auto-detection table (update the |
| 550 | blog-write SKILL.md or document the detection keywords) |
| 551 | |
| 552 | ### Template Best Practices |
| 553 | |
| 554 | | Practice | Why | |
| 555 | |----------|-----| |
| 556 | | Keep sections focused on one topic each | AI systems extract by section | |
| 557 | | Place `[VISUAL]` where data naturally supports a chart | Forced visuals feel awkward | |
| 558 | | Use `[INFO-GAIN]` liberally | These sections differentiate from AI consensus | |
| 559 | | Set realistic word counts | Over-padding dilutes quality scores | |
| 560 | | Always include `[FAQ]` zone and conclusion | Both are scoring elements | |
| 561 | | Test with `/blog analyze` after writing | Validates template effectiveness | |
| 562 | |
| 563 | |
| 564 | |
| 565 | ## FAQ Section Guidelines (All Templates) |
| 566 | |
| 567 | Every template includes a visible Q&A section. It supports engagement and may aid |
| 568 | AI citation as an entity signal. It is not a Google rich result. |
| 569 | |
| 570 | ### FAQ Requirements |
| 571 | |
| 572 | | Requirement | Specification | |
| 573 | |-------------|--------------| |
| 574 | | Minimum questions | 3 (standard templates), 5-8 (pillar-page, faq-knowledge) | |
| 575 | | Maximum questions | 8 (diminishing returns beyond this) | |
| 576 | | Answer length | 40-60 words each | |
| 577 | | Statistics | Include only when factual, relevant, and sourced | |
| 578 | | Source attribution | Every statistic must cite a named source | |
| 579 | | Schema | Generate FAQPage only when FAQ content is visible; never present it as a Google rich result; keep Article + Person + Organization + BreadcrumbList as the 2026 priority | |
| 580 | |
| 581 | ### FAQ Question Sources |
| 582 | People Also Ask results for the target keyword |
| 583 | Reddit threads asking about the topic |
| 584 | Common objections or misconceptions |
| 585 | "How much", "how long", "is it worth" questions |
| 586 | Questions that the main article sections do not fully address |
| 587 |
Discussion
Browse more free Claude skills.