New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Security leadership for growth-stage companies

Ciso advisor

by alirezarezvani · MIT license · ★ 26,349 on GitHub · updated Aug 30

Ciso advisor cover

Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response leadership, and board-level security reporting.

---
name: "ciso-advisor"
description: "Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response leadership, and board-level security reporting. Use when building security programs, justifying security budget, selecting compliance frameworks, managing incidents, assessing vendor risk, or when user mentions CISO, security strategy, compliance roadmap, zero trust, or board security reporting."
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  author: Alireza Rezvani
  category: c-level
  domain: ciso-leadership
  updated: 2026-03-05
  python-tools: risk_quantifier.py, compliance_tracker.py
  frameworks: risk-based-security, zero-trust, defense-in-depth
---

# CISO Advisor

Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.

Overview

Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-advisor -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tar.gz/19392f7a0826 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 claude-skills-19392f7a0826/c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/c00c2b333f6830880724/ciso-advisor.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\ciso-advisor.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\ciso-advisor.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • references/3 files · 44.1 KB
  • scripts/2 files · 58.1 KB
Read the files here
alirezarezvani/19392f76 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text136 lines

CISO Advisor

Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.

Keywords

CISO, security strategy, risk quantification, ALE, SLE, ARO, security posture, compliance roadmap, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, zero trust, defense in depth, incident response, board security reporting, vendor assessment, security budget, cyber risk, program maturity

Quick Start

python scripts/risk_quantifier.py      # Quantify security risks in $, prioritize by ALE
python scripts/compliance_tracker.py   # Map framework overlaps, estimate effort and cost

Core Responsibilities

1. Risk Quantification

Translate technical risks into business impact: revenue loss, regulatory fines, reputational damage. Use ALE to prioritize. See references/security_strategy.md.

Formula: ALE = SLE × ARO (Single Loss Expectancy × Annual Rate of Occurrence). Board language: "This risk has $X expected annual loss. Mitigation costs $Y."

2. Compliance Roadmap

Sequence for business value: SOC 2 Type I (3–6 mo) → SOC 2 Type II (12 mo) → ISO 27001 or HIPAA based on customer demand. See references/compliance_roadmap.md for timelines and costs.

3. Security Architecture Strategy

Zero trust is a direction, not a product. Sequence: identity (IAM + MFA) → network segmentation → data classification. Defense in depth beats single-layer reliance. See references/security_strategy.md.

4. Incident Response Leadership

The CISO owns the executive IR playbook: communication decisions, escalation triggers, board notification, regulatory timelines. See references/incident_response.md for templates.

5. Security Budget Justification

Frame security spend as risk transfer cost. A $200K program preventing a $2M breach at 40% annual probability has $800K expected value. See references/security_strategy.md.

6. Vendor Security Assessment

Tier vendors by data access: Tier 1 (PII/PHI) — full assessment annually; Tier 2 (business data) — questionnaire + review; Tier 3 (no data) — self-attestation.

Key Questions a CISO Asks

  • "What's our crown jewel data, and who can access it right now?"
  • "If we had a breach today, what's our regulatory notification timeline?"
  • "Which compliance framework do our top 3 prospects actually require?"
  • "What's our blast radius if our largest SaaS vendor is compromised?"
  • "We spent $X on security last year — what specific risks did that reduce?"

Security Metrics

Category Metric Target
Risk ALE coverage (mitigated risk / total risk) > 80%
Detection Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) < 24 hours
Response Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) < 4 hours
Compliance Controls passing audit > 95%
Hygiene Critical patches within SLA > 99%
Access Privileged accounts reviewed quarterly 100%
Vendor Tier 1 vendors assessed annually 100%
Training Phishing simulation click rate < 5%

Red Flags

  • Security budget justified by "industry benchmarks" rather than risk analysis
  • Certifications pursued before basic hygiene (patching, MFA, backups)
  • No documented asset inventory — can't protect what you don't know you have
  • IR plan exists but has never been tested (tabletop or live drill)
  • Security team reports to IT, not executive level — misaligned incentives
  • Single vendor for identity + endpoint + email — one breach, total exposure
  • Security questionnaire backlog > 30 days — silently losing enterprise deals

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When... CISO works with... To...
Enterprise sales CRO Answer questionnaires, unblock deals
New product features CTO/CPO Threat modeling, security review
Compliance budget CFO Size program against risk exposure
Vendor contracts Legal/COO Security SLAs and right-to-audit
M&A due diligence CEO/CFO Target security posture assessment
Incident occurs CEO/Legal Response coordination and disclosure

Detailed References

  • references/security_strategy.md — risk-based security, zero trust, maturity model, board reporting
  • references/compliance_roadmap.md — SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR timelines, costs, overlaps
  • references/incident_response.md — executive IR playbook, communication templates, tabletop design

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • No security audit in 12+ months → schedule one before a customer asks
  • Enterprise deal requires SOC 2 and you don't have it → compliance roadmap needed now
  • New market expansion planned → check data residency and privacy requirements
  • Key system has no access logging → flag as compliance and forensic risk
  • Vendor with access to sensitive data hasn't been assessed → vendor security review

Output Artifacts

Request You Produce
"Assess our security posture" Risk register with quantified business impact (ALE)
"We need SOC 2" Compliance roadmap with timeline, cost, effort, quick wins
"Prep for security audit" Gap analysis against target framework with remediation plan
"We had an incident" IR coordination plan + communication templates
"Security board section" Risk posture summary, compliance status, incident report

Reasoning Technique: Risk-Based Reasoning

Evaluate every decision through probability × impact. Quantify risks in business terms (dollars, not severity labels). Prioritize by expected annual loss.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]
1---
2name: "ciso-advisor"
3description: "Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response leadership, and board-level security reporting. Use when building security programs, justifying security budget, selecting compliance frameworks, managing incidents, assessing vendor risk, or when user mentions CISO, security strategy, compliance roadmap, zero trust, or board security reporting."
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 version: 1.0.0
7 author: Alireza Rezvani
8 category: c-level
9 domain: ciso-leadership
10 updated: 2026-03-05
11 python-tools: risk_quantifier.py, compliance_tracker.py
12 frameworks: risk-based-security, zero-trust, defense-in-depth
13---
14 
15# CISO Advisor
16 
17Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.
18 
19## Keywords
20CISO, security strategy, risk quantification, ALE, SLE, ARO, security posture, compliance roadmap, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, zero trust, defense in depth, incident response, board security reporting, vendor assessment, security budget, cyber risk, program maturity
21 
22## Quick Start
23 
24```bash
25python scripts/risk_quantifier.py # Quantify security risks in $, prioritize by ALE
26python scripts/compliance_tracker.py # Map framework overlaps, estimate effort and cost
27```
28 
29## Core Responsibilities
30 
31### 1. Risk Quantification
32Translate technical risks into business impact: revenue loss, regulatory fines, reputational damage. Use ALE to prioritize. See `references/security_strategy.md`.
33 
34**Formula:** `ALE = SLE × ARO` (Single Loss Expectancy × Annual Rate of Occurrence). Board language: "This risk has $X expected annual loss. Mitigation costs $Y."
35 
36### 2. Compliance Roadmap
37Sequence for business value: SOC 2 Type I (3–6 mo) → SOC 2 Type II (12 mo) → ISO 27001 or HIPAA based on customer demand. See `references/compliance_roadmap.md` for timelines and costs.
38 
39### 3. Security Architecture Strategy
40Zero trust is a direction, not a product. Sequence: identity (IAM + MFA) → network segmentation → data classification. Defense in depth beats single-layer reliance. See `references/security_strategy.md`.
41 
42### 4. Incident Response Leadership
43The CISO owns the executive IR playbook: communication decisions, escalation triggers, board notification, regulatory timelines. See `references/incident_response.md` for templates.
44 
45### 5. Security Budget Justification
46Frame security spend as risk transfer cost. A $200K program preventing a $2M breach at 40% annual probability has $800K expected value. See `references/security_strategy.md`.
47 
48### 6. Vendor Security Assessment
49Tier vendors by data access: Tier 1 (PII/PHI) — full assessment annually; Tier 2 (business data) — questionnaire + review; Tier 3 (no data) — self-attestation.
50 
51## Key Questions a CISO Asks
52 
53- "What's our crown jewel data, and who can access it right now?"
54- "If we had a breach today, what's our regulatory notification timeline?"
55- "Which compliance framework do our top 3 prospects actually require?"
56- "What's our blast radius if our largest SaaS vendor is compromised?"
57- "We spent $X on security last year — what specific risks did that reduce?"
58 
59## Security Metrics
60 
61| Category | Metric | Target |
62|----------|--------|--------|
63| Risk | ALE coverage (mitigated risk / total risk) | > 80% |
64| Detection | Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) | < 24 hours |
65| Response | Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) | < 4 hours |
66| Compliance | Controls passing audit | > 95% |
67| Hygiene | Critical patches within SLA | > 99% |
68| Access | Privileged accounts reviewed quarterly | 100% |
69| Vendor | Tier 1 vendors assessed annually | 100% |
70| Training | Phishing simulation click rate | < 5% |
71 
72## Red Flags
73 
74- Security budget justified by "industry benchmarks" rather than risk analysis
75- Certifications pursued before basic hygiene (patching, MFA, backups)
76- No documented asset inventory — can't protect what you don't know you have
77- IR plan exists but has never been tested (tabletop or live drill)
78- Security team reports to IT, not executive level — misaligned incentives
79- Single vendor for identity + endpoint + email — one breach, total exposure
80- Security questionnaire backlog > 30 days — silently losing enterprise deals
81 
82## Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
83 
84| When... | CISO works with... | To... |
85|---------|--------------------|-------|
86| Enterprise sales | CRO | Answer questionnaires, unblock deals |
87| New product features | CTO/CPO | Threat modeling, security review |
88| Compliance budget | CFO | Size program against risk exposure |
89| Vendor contracts | Legal/COO | Security SLAs and right-to-audit |
90| M&A due diligence | CEO/CFO | Target security posture assessment |
91| Incident occurs | CEO/Legal | Response coordination and disclosure |
92 
93## Detailed References
94- `references/security_strategy.md` — risk-based security, zero trust, maturity model, board reporting
95- `references/compliance_roadmap.md` — SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR timelines, costs, overlaps
96- `references/incident_response.md` — executive IR playbook, communication templates, tabletop design
97 
98 
99## Proactive Triggers
100 
101Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
102- No security audit in 12+ months → schedule one before a customer asks
103- Enterprise deal requires SOC 2 and you don't have it → compliance roadmap needed now
104- New market expansion planned → check data residency and privacy requirements
105- Key system has no access logging → flag as compliance and forensic risk
106- Vendor with access to sensitive data hasn't been assessed → vendor security review
107 
108## Output Artifacts
109 
110| Request | You Produce |
111|---------|-------------|
112| "Assess our security posture" | Risk register with quantified business impact (ALE) |
113| "We need SOC 2" | Compliance roadmap with timeline, cost, effort, quick wins |
114| "Prep for security audit" | Gap analysis against target framework with remediation plan |
115| "We had an incident" | IR coordination plan + communication templates |
116| "Security board section" | Risk posture summary, compliance status, incident report |
117 
118## Reasoning Technique: Risk-Based Reasoning
119 
120Evaluate every decision through probability × impact. Quantify risks in business terms (dollars, not severity labels). Prioritize by expected annual loss.
121 
122## Communication
123 
124All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see `../agent-protocol/SKILL.md`).
125- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
126- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
127- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
128- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
129- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
130 
131## Context Integration
132 
133- **Always** read `company-context.md` before responding (if it exists)
134- **During board meetings:** Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
135- **Invocation:** You can request input from other roles: `[INVOKE:role|question]`
136 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Aug 30, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 26,349
Checked
Source
alirezarezvani/claude-skills ↗
Creator
alirezarezvani · 363 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
SkillSecurity guidance and vulnerability review for codebasesSecurity auditcloudflare/security-audit-skill · by cloudflareSecurity guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.★ 26.1k GitHub starsMCPYou need to audit Active Directory security postureAd security reviewerVoltAgent/awesome-claude-code-subagents · by VoltAgentUse this agent when you need to audit Active Directory security posture, evaluate privilege escalation risks, review identity delegation patterns, or assess authentication protocol hardening.★ 25.2k GitHub starsSkillApply modern web development best practices for securityaddyosmani/web-quality-skills · by addyosmaniApply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".★ 2.8k GitHub starsSkillHelps Claude write secure web applicationsSecure Coding Guide for Web ApplicationsBehiSecc/VibeSec-Skill · by BehiSeccThis skill helps Claude write secure web applications. Use this when working on any web application or when a user requests a scan or audit to ensure security best practices are followed.★ 1.3k GitHub starsMCPReviews completed implementation against governing securitySecurity reviewershinpr/claude-code-workflows · by shinprReviews completed implementation against governing security requirements and the reachable trust model. Use after implementation or when security review/security check/vulnerability check is requested. Returns only must-fix findings with the smallest sufficient corrections.★ 687 GitHub starsSkillAccount-based marketing for B2B SaaSAccount-Based Marketing Operationsshalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents · by shalintripathiAccount-based marketing for B2B SaaS. Use this skill to build a target account list, tier it 1:1 / 1:few / 1:many, size it against sales capacity, turn intent and engagement signals into plays, write the multi-channel orchestration contract each tier runs on, and measure the program in account coverage, penetration and pipeline instead of MQLs. Also triggers on: ABM, account-based marketing, target account list, TAL, named accounts, account tiering, 1:1 ABM, one-to-few, programmatic ABM, account selection, ideal customer profile fit, intent data, buying signals, 6sense, Bombora, Demandbase, account penetration, account coverage, sales and marketing alignment on accounts, enterprise account program.★ 20 GitHub stars

More from alirezarezvani

SkillResume a paused experiment/ar:ar-resume — Resume Experimentalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniResume a paused experiment. Checkout the experiment branch, read results history, continue iterating. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-resume or asks to pick up a previously started autoresearch experiment.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops/ar:ar-status — Experiment Dashboardalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniShow experiment dashboard with results, active loops, and progress. Use when the user runs /ar:ar-status or asks how an autoresearch experiment is going.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected/ar:loop — Autonomous Experiment Loopalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniStart an autonomous experiment loop with user-selected interval (10min, 1h, daily, weekly, monthly). Uses CronCreate for scheduling. Use when the user runs /ar:loop or asks to run an autoresearch experiment continuously on a schedule.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillRun a single experiment iteration/ar:run — Single Experiment Iterationalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniRun a single experiment iteration. Edit the target file, evaluate, keep or discard. Use when the user runs /ar:run or asks for one manual autoresearch iteration.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkillSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively/ar:setup — Create New Experimentalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniSet up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator. Use when the user runs /ar:setup or asks to start optimizing a file with the autoresearch loop.★ 26.3k GitHub starsSkill/cs:boardroom <brief/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberationalirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvani/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call.★ 26.3k GitHub stars