/digital-marketing-pro:video-packaging skill

Package a video: title and thumbnail-text pairs that never repeat words, or critique them.

by indranilbanerjee·MIT license·★ 866 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Inside this skill

SKILL.md · the author's own words
# /digital-marketing-pro:video-packaging

Packaging decides whether a video gets watched; the content only decides
whether it deserved to be. On every video surface the viewer sees two elements
at once — the title and the thumbnail text — and the craft is that **they must
do different jobs**:

- **The title carries context and keywords** — what the video is, phrased the
  way people search and the way the platform's systems read it.
- **The thumbnail text carries the tension** — the number, the contradiction,
  the "wait, what?" that a human reacts to in half a second.
- **Overlap is wasted real estate.** A thumb word that already appears in the
  title bought nothing with the scarcest pixels the brand owns.

## Discovery intent — tag every package

Word-for-word excerpt, not a result. Read the full SKILL.md ↓

Files of /digital-marketing-pro:video-packaging

indranilbanerjee/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text112 lines

/digital-marketing-pro:video-packaging

Packaging decides whether a video gets watched; the content only decides whether it deserved to be. On every video surface the viewer sees two elements at once — the title and the thumbnail text — and the craft is that they must do different jobs:

  • The title carries context and keywords — what the video is, phrased the way people search and the way the platform's systems read it.
  • The thumbnail text carries the tension — the number, the contradiction, the "wait, what?" that a human reacts to in half a second.
  • Overlap is wasted real estate. A thumb word that already appears in the title bought nothing with the scarcest pixels the brand owns.

Discovery intent — tag every package

A video idea earns discovery one of two ways, and the packaging differs:

Intent How it is found Packaging consequence
Search Typed queries; ranks over months Title leads with the query phrasing (front-load the keyword); thumb adds the differentiator vs the other results
Browse Suggested/home feeds; spikes on click-through Title can spend more of its length on intrigue; thumb carries the pattern-break
Both Rare; usually a search topic with a browse-worthy angle Package for search, let the thumb do the browse work

No search or browse logic → not a video idea yet. Route it back through topic development before spending packaging effort on it. For search-intent videos, pull the real query phrasing from /digital-marketing-pro:keyword-research rather than guessing it.

Generate mode

Input: the topic or concept, the brand, target platform, intent if known.

# Video packaging — [topic]

**Discovery intent:** Search / Browse / Both — [the reasoning in one line]

## Pair 1 — [angle: curiosity / benefit / identity]
**Title:** [≤60 chars where possible — what survives truncation comes first]
**Thumb text:** [1-3 words]
**Why they pair:** [the different jobs, and how they combine into one click decision]

## Pair 2 — [different angle]
## Pair 3 — [different angle]

## Recommendation
[Which pair leads and why — grounded in the intent tag, not taste]

## A/B note
[Which single element to vary if testing — never both at once]

Critique mode

Input: an existing title and/or thumbnail text (works from a screenshot description too).

# Packaging critique — [the draft]

## Verdict: PASS / FIX / FAIL

## The pairing check
[Do title and thumb do different jobs? Quote any echoed words — each is the
finding, verbatim.]

## Working
[What earns its place]

## Not working
[Specific, quotable problems — vague titles, buried keywords, thumb text
restating the title, curiosity with no clarity]

## 3 fixed pairs
[Revised packages, same content, same claims — packaging never promises what
the video does not deliver]

Critical rules

  • Reject any pair where a thumb word appears in the title. This is the countable core rule — check it word by word, not by impression.
  • Titles ≤60 characters where possible; when longer, everything that matters sits before the truncation point.
  • Thumb text: 1–3 words. Four is a caption, not a thumbnail.
  • Clarity beats curiosity. A pair that intrigues but does not say what the viewer gets fails — curiosity-gap packaging that the content cannot pay off is churn, and on regulated brands it is a compliance finding.
  • Packaging never outpromises the video. The claims in a title pass the same brand guardrails as any other copy; run /digital-marketing-pro:check before anything ships.
  • Three pairs minimum in Generate; three fixes minimum in Critique. One option is a decision already made; the client gets choices with reasoning.
  • Tag the intent every time. An untagged package is a guess about how the video will be found — and search and browse reward different structures.

Pairs with

  • /digital-marketing-pro:video-script — the script this packaging fronts; its thumbnail-concept step follows the same pairing rule
  • /digital-marketing-pro:keyword-research — real query phrasing for search-intent titles
  • /digital-marketing-pro:check — claims and compliance gate before publishing
1---
2name: video-packaging
3description: "Package a video: title and thumbnail-text pairs that never repeat words, or critique them. \"why is no one clicking this video\""
4argument-hint: "[brand-name] [--topic <video topic>] [--critique \"<existing title> / <thumb text>\"]"
5user-invocable: true
6---
7 
8# /digital-marketing-pro:video-packaging
9 
10Packaging decides whether a video gets watched; the content only decides
11whether it deserved to be. On every video surface the viewer sees two elements
12at once — the title and the thumbnail text — and the craft is that **they must
13do different jobs**:
14 
15- **The title carries context and keywords** — what the video is, phrased the
16 way people search and the way the platform's systems read it.
17- **The thumbnail text carries the tension** — the number, the contradiction,
18 the "wait, what?" that a human reacts to in half a second.
19- **Overlap is wasted real estate.** A thumb word that already appears in the
20 title bought nothing with the scarcest pixels the brand owns.
21 
22## Discovery intent — tag every package
23 
24A video idea earns discovery one of two ways, and the packaging differs:
25 
26| Intent | How it is found | Packaging consequence |
27|---|---|---|
28| **Search** | Typed queries; ranks over months | Title leads with the query phrasing (front-load the keyword); thumb adds the differentiator vs the other results |
29| **Browse** | Suggested/home feeds; spikes on click-through | Title can spend more of its length on intrigue; thumb carries the pattern-break |
30| **Both** | Rare; usually a search topic with a browse-worthy angle | Package for search, let the thumb do the browse work |
31 
32**No search or browse logic → not a video idea yet.** Route it back through
33topic development before spending packaging effort on it. For search-intent
34videos, pull the real query phrasing from
35/digital-marketing-pro:keyword-research rather than guessing it.
36 
37## Generate mode
38 
39Input: the topic or concept, the brand, target platform, intent if known.
40 
41```
42# Video packaging — [topic]
43 
44**Discovery intent:** Search / Browse / Both — [the reasoning in one line]
45 
46## Pair 1 — [angle: curiosity / benefit / identity]
47**Title:** [≤60 chars where possible — what survives truncation comes first]
48**Thumb text:** [1-3 words]
49**Why they pair:** [the different jobs, and how they combine into one click decision]
50 
51## Pair 2 — [different angle]
52## Pair 3 — [different angle]
53 
54## Recommendation
55[Which pair leads and why — grounded in the intent tag, not taste]
56 
57## A/B note
58[Which single element to vary if testing — never both at once]
59```
60 
61## Critique mode
62 
63Input: an existing title and/or thumbnail text (works from a screenshot
64description too).
65 
66```
67# Packaging critique — [the draft]
68 
69## Verdict: PASS / FIX / FAIL
70 
71## The pairing check
72[Do title and thumb do different jobs? Quote any echoed words — each is the
73finding, verbatim.]
74 
75## Working
76[What earns its place]
77 
78## Not working
79[Specific, quotable problems — vague titles, buried keywords, thumb text
80restating the title, curiosity with no clarity]
81 
82## 3 fixed pairs
83[Revised packages, same content, same claims — packaging never promises what
84the video does not deliver]
85```
86 
87## Critical rules
88 
89- **Reject any pair where a thumb word appears in the title.** This is the
90 countable core rule — check it word by word, not by impression.
91- **Titles ≤60 characters where possible**; when longer, everything that
92 matters sits before the truncation point.
93- **Thumb text: 1–3 words.** Four is a caption, not a thumbnail.
94- **Clarity beats curiosity.** A pair that intrigues but does not say what the
95 viewer gets fails — curiosity-gap packaging that the content cannot pay off
96 is churn, and on regulated brands it is a compliance finding.
97- **Packaging never outpromises the video.** The claims in a title pass the
98 same brand guardrails as any other copy; run /digital-marketing-pro:check
99 before anything ships.
100- **Three pairs minimum in Generate; three fixes minimum in Critique.** One
101 option is a decision already made; the client gets choices with reasoning.
102- **Tag the intent every time.** An untagged package is a guess about how the
103 video will be found — and search and browse reward different structures.
104 
105## Pairs with
106 
107- /digital-marketing-pro:video-script — the script this packaging fronts;
108 its thumbnail-concept step follows the same pairing rule
109- /digital-marketing-pro:keyword-research — real query phrasing for
110 search-intent titles
111- /digital-marketing-pro:check — claims and compliance gate before publishing
112 

Discussion

Alternatives