Senior architect
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design".
How to use it
Claude Code
- Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into
~/.claude/skills/senior-architect, including the files SKILL.md points to. - Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
npx degit alirezarezvani/claude-skills/engineering-team/skills/senior-architect#main ~/.claude/skills/senior-architectFor one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/senior-architect. This skill also uses architecture.md, package.json, requirements.txt, UserService.ts, Next.js, Node.js — copying SKILL.md alone won't be enough. See the folder on GitHub.
Claude (web or desktop app)
- On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
- Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
- Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
- Check the skill is switched on.
- Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
- ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
- Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
- Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
- Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.
Source of Senior architect
Show the full text344 lines
| name | description |
|---|---|
| senior-architect | This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format. |
Senior Architect
Architecture design and analysis tools for making informed technical decisions.
Table of Contents
- Quick Start
- Tools Overview
- Decision Workflows
- Reference Documentation
- Tech Stack Coverage
- Common Commands
Quick Start
# Generate architecture diagram from project
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./my-project --format mermaid
# Analyze dependencies for issues
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./my-project --output json
# Get architecture assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py ./my-project --verbose
Tools Overview
1. Architecture Diagram Generator
Generates architecture diagrams from project structure in multiple formats.
Solves: "I need to visualize my system architecture for documentation or team discussion"
Input: Project directory path Output: Diagram code (Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII)
Supported diagram types:
component- Shows modules and their relationshipslayer- Shows architectural layers (presentation, business, data)deployment- Shows deployment topology
Usage:
# Mermaid format (default)
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format mermaid --type component
# PlantUML format
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format plantuml --type layer
# ASCII format (terminal-friendly)
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format ascii
# Save to file
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project -o architecture.md
Example output (Mermaid):
graph TD
A[API Gateway] --> B[Auth Service]
A --> C[User Service]
B --> D[(PostgreSQL)]
C --> D
2. Dependency Analyzer
Analyzes project dependencies for coupling, circular dependencies, and outdated packages.
Solves: "I need to understand my dependency tree and identify potential issues"
Input: Project directory path Output: Analysis report (JSON or human-readable)
Analyzes:
- Dependency tree (direct and transitive)
- Circular dependencies between modules
- Coupling score (0-100)
- Outdated packages
Supported package managers:
- npm/yarn (
package.json) - Python (
requirements.txt,pyproject.toml) - Go (
go.mod) - Rust (
Cargo.toml)
Usage:
# Human-readable report
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project
# JSON output for CI/CD integration
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --output json
# Check only for circular dependencies
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --check circular
# Verbose mode with recommendations
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --verbose
Example output:
Dependency Analysis Report
==========================
Total dependencies: 47 (32 direct, 15 transitive)
Coupling score: 72/100 (moderate)
Issues found:
- CIRCULAR: auth → user → permissions → auth
- OUTDATED: lodash 4.17.15 → 4.17.21 (security)
Recommendations:
1. Extract shared interface to break circular dependency
2. Update lodash to fix CVE-2020-8203
3. Project Architect
Analyzes project structure and detects architectural patterns, code smells, and improvement opportunities.
Solves: "I want to understand the current architecture and identify areas for improvement"
Input: Project directory path Output: Architecture assessment report
Detects:
- Architectural patterns (MVC, layered, hexagonal, microservices indicators)
- Code organization issues (god classes, mixed concerns)
- Layer violations
- Missing architectural components
Usage:
# Full assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project
# Verbose with detailed recommendations
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --verbose
# JSON output
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --output json
# Check specific aspect
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --check layers
Example output:
Architecture Assessment
=======================
Detected pattern: Layered Architecture (confidence: 85%)
Structure analysis:
✓ controllers/ - Presentation layer detected
✓ services/ - Business logic layer detected
✓ repositories/ - Data access layer detected
⚠ models/ - Mixed domain and DTOs
Issues:
- LARGE FILE: UserService.ts (1,847 lines) - consider splitting
- MIXED CONCERNS: PaymentController contains business logic
Recommendations:
1. Split UserService into focused services
2. Move business logic from controllers to services
3. Separate domain models from DTOs
Decision Workflows
Database Selection Workflow
Use when choosing a database for a new project or migrating existing data.
Step 1: Identify data characteristics
| Characteristic | Points to SQL | Points to NoSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Structured with relationships | ✓ | |
| ACID transactions required | ✓ | |
| Flexible/evolving schema | ✓ | |
| Document-oriented data | ✓ | |
| Time-series data | ✓ (specialized) |
Step 2: Evaluate scale requirements
- <1M records, single region → PostgreSQL or MySQL
- 1M-100M records, read-heavy → PostgreSQL with read replicas
100M records, global distribution → CockroachDB, Spanner, or DynamoDB
- High write throughput (>10K/sec) → Cassandra or ScyllaDB
Step 3: Check consistency requirements
- Strong consistency required → SQL or CockroachDB
- Eventual consistency acceptable → DynamoDB, Cassandra, MongoDB
Step 4: Document decision Create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) with:
- Context and requirements
- Options considered
- Decision and rationale
- Trade-offs accepted
Quick reference:
PostgreSQL → Default choice for most applications
MongoDB → Document store, flexible schema
Redis → Caching, sessions, real-time features
DynamoDB → Serverless, auto-scaling, AWS-native
TimescaleDB → Time-series data with SQL interface
Architecture Pattern Selection Workflow
Use when designing a new system or refactoring existing architecture.
Step 1: Assess team and project size
| Team Size | Recommended Starting Point |
|---|---|
| 1-3 developers | Modular monolith |
| 4-10 developers | Modular monolith or service-oriented |
| 10+ developers | Consider microservices |
Step 2: Evaluate deployment requirements
- Single deployment unit acceptable → Monolith
- Independent scaling needed → Microservices
- Mixed (some services scale differently) → Hybrid
Step 3: Consider data boundaries
- Shared database acceptable → Monolith or modular monolith
- Strict data isolation required → Microservices with separate DBs
- Event-driven communication fits → Event-sourcing/CQRS
Step 4: Match pattern to requirements
| Requirement | Recommended Pattern |
|---|---|
| Rapid MVP development | Modular Monolith |
| Independent team deployment | Microservices |
| Complex domain logic | Domain-Driven Design |
| High read/write ratio difference | CQRS |
| Audit trail required | Event Sourcing |
| Third-party integrations | Hexagonal/Ports & Adapters |
See references/architecture_patterns.md for detailed pattern descriptions.
Monolith vs Microservices Decision
Choose Monolith when:
- Team is small (<10 developers)
- Domain boundaries are unclear
- Rapid iteration is priority
- Operational complexity must be minimized
- Shared database is acceptable
Choose Microservices when:
- Teams can own services end-to-end
- Independent deployment is critical
- Different scaling requirements per component
- Technology diversity is needed
- Domain boundaries are well understood
Hybrid approach: Start with a modular monolith. Extract services only when:
- A module has significantly different scaling needs
- A team needs independent deployment
- Technology constraints require separation
Reference Documentation
Load these files for detailed information:
| File | Contains | Load when user asks about |
|---|---|---|
references/architecture_patterns.md |
9 architecture patterns with trade-offs, code examples, and when to use | "which pattern?", "microservices vs monolith", "event-driven", "CQRS" |
references/system_design_workflows.md |
6 step-by-step workflows for system design tasks | "how to design?", "capacity planning", "API design", "migration" |
references/tech_decision_guide.md |
Decision matrices for technology choices | "which database?", "which framework?", "which cloud?", "which cache?" |
Tech Stack Coverage
Languages: TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust Frontend: React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, React Native, Flutter Backend: Node.js, Express, FastAPI, Go, GraphQL, REST Databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, DynamoDB, Cassandra Infrastructure: Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS, GCP, Azure CI/CD: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins
Common Commands
# Architecture visualization
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format mermaid
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format plantuml
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format ascii
# Dependency analysis
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --verbose
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --check circular
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --output json
# Architecture assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py . --verbose
python scripts/project_architect.py . --check layers
python scripts/project_architect.py . --output json
Getting Help
- Run any script with
--helpfor usage information - Check reference documentation for detailed patterns and workflows
- Use
--verboseflag for detailed explanations and recommendations
| 1 | |
| 2 | name "senior-architect" |
| 3 | description This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Senior Architect |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Architecture design and analysis tools for making informed technical decisions. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## Table of Contents |
| 11 | |
| 12 | [Quick Start] |
| 13 | [Tools Overview] |
| 14 | [Architecture Diagram Generator] |
| 15 | [Dependency Analyzer] |
| 16 | [Project Architect] |
| 17 | [Decision Workflows] |
| 18 | [Database Selection] |
| 19 | [Architecture Pattern Selection] |
| 20 | [Monolith vs Microservices] |
| 21 | [Reference Documentation] |
| 22 | [Tech Stack Coverage] |
| 23 | [Common Commands] |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ## Quick Start |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | # Generate architecture diagram from project |
| 31 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./my-project --format mermaid |
| 32 | |
| 33 | # Analyze dependencies for issues |
| 34 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./my-project --output json |
| 35 | |
| 36 | # Get architecture assessment |
| 37 | python scripts/project_architect.py ./my-project --verbose |
| 38 | |
| 39 | |
| 40 | |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ## Tools Overview |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ### 1. Architecture Diagram Generator |
| 45 | |
| 46 | Generates architecture diagrams from project structure in multiple formats. |
| 47 | |
| 48 | **Solves:** "I need to visualize my system architecture for documentation or team discussion" |
| 49 | |
| 50 | **Input:** Project directory path |
| 51 | **Output:** Diagram code (Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII) |
| 52 | |
| 53 | **Supported diagram types:** |
| 54 | `component` - Shows modules and their relationships |
| 55 | `layer` - Shows architectural layers (presentation, business, data) |
| 56 | `deployment` - Shows deployment topology |
| 57 | |
| 58 | **Usage:** |
| 59 | |
| 60 | # Mermaid format (default) |
| 61 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format mermaid --type component |
| 62 | |
| 63 | # PlantUML format |
| 64 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format plantuml --type layer |
| 65 | |
| 66 | # ASCII format (terminal-friendly) |
| 67 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format ascii |
| 68 | |
| 69 | # Save to file |
| 70 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project -o architecture.md |
| 71 | |
| 72 | |
| 73 | **Example output (Mermaid):** |
| 74 | |
| 75 | graph TD |
| 76 | A[API Gateway] --> B[Auth Service] |
| 77 | A --> C[User Service] |
| 78 | B --> D[(PostgreSQL)] |
| 79 | C --> D |
| 80 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 83 | |
| 84 | ### 2. Dependency Analyzer |
| 85 | |
| 86 | Analyzes project dependencies for coupling, circular dependencies, and outdated packages. |
| 87 | |
| 88 | **Solves:** "I need to understand my dependency tree and identify potential issues" |
| 89 | |
| 90 | **Input:** Project directory path |
| 91 | **Output:** Analysis report (JSON or human-readable) |
| 92 | |
| 93 | **Analyzes:** |
| 94 | Dependency tree (direct and transitive) |
| 95 | Circular dependencies between modules |
| 96 | Coupling score (0-100) |
| 97 | Outdated packages |
| 98 | |
| 99 | **Supported package managers:** |
| 100 | npm/yarn (`package.json`) |
| 101 | Python (`requirements.txt`, `pyproject.toml`) |
| 102 | Go (`go.mod`) |
| 103 | Rust (`Cargo.toml`) |
| 104 | |
| 105 | **Usage:** |
| 106 | |
| 107 | # Human-readable report |
| 108 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project |
| 109 | |
| 110 | # JSON output for CI/CD integration |
| 111 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --output json |
| 112 | |
| 113 | # Check only for circular dependencies |
| 114 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --check circular |
| 115 | |
| 116 | # Verbose mode with recommendations |
| 117 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --verbose |
| 118 | |
| 119 | |
| 120 | **Example output:** |
| 121 | |
| 122 | Dependency Analysis Report |
| 123 | ========================== |
| 124 | Total dependencies: 47 (32 direct, 15 transitive) |
| 125 | Coupling score: 72/100 (moderate) |
| 126 | |
| 127 | Issues found: |
| 128 | - CIRCULAR: auth → user → permissions → auth |
| 129 | - OUTDATED: lodash 4.17.15 → 4.17.21 (security) |
| 130 | |
| 131 | Recommendations: |
| 132 | 1. Extract shared interface to break circular dependency |
| 133 | 2. Update lodash to fix CVE-2020-8203 |
| 134 | |
| 135 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | |
| 138 | ### 3. Project Architect |
| 139 | |
| 140 | Analyzes project structure and detects architectural patterns, code smells, and improvement opportunities. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | **Solves:** "I want to understand the current architecture and identify areas for improvement" |
| 143 | |
| 144 | **Input:** Project directory path |
| 145 | **Output:** Architecture assessment report |
| 146 | |
| 147 | **Detects:** |
| 148 | Architectural patterns (MVC, layered, hexagonal, microservices indicators) |
| 149 | Code organization issues (god classes, mixed concerns) |
| 150 | Layer violations |
| 151 | Missing architectural components |
| 152 | |
| 153 | **Usage:** |
| 154 | |
| 155 | # Full assessment |
| 156 | python scripts/project_architect.py ./project |
| 157 | |
| 158 | # Verbose with detailed recommendations |
| 159 | python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --verbose |
| 160 | |
| 161 | # JSON output |
| 162 | python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --output json |
| 163 | |
| 164 | # Check specific aspect |
| 165 | python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --check layers |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | **Example output:** |
| 169 | |
| 170 | Architecture Assessment |
| 171 | ======================= |
| 172 | Detected pattern: Layered Architecture (confidence: 85%) |
| 173 | |
| 174 | Structure analysis: |
| 175 | ✓ controllers/ - Presentation layer detected |
| 176 | ✓ services/ - Business logic layer detected |
| 177 | ✓ repositories/ - Data access layer detected |
| 178 | ⚠ models/ - Mixed domain and DTOs |
| 179 | |
| 180 | Issues: |
| 181 | - LARGE FILE: UserService.ts (1,847 lines) - consider splitting |
| 182 | - MIXED CONCERNS: PaymentController contains business logic |
| 183 | |
| 184 | Recommendations: |
| 185 | 1. Split UserService into focused services |
| 186 | 2. Move business logic from controllers to services |
| 187 | 3. Separate domain models from DTOs |
| 188 | |
| 189 | |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | ## Decision Workflows |
| 193 | |
| 194 | ### Database Selection Workflow |
| 195 | |
| 196 | Use when choosing a database for a new project or migrating existing data. |
| 197 | |
| 198 | **Step 1: Identify data characteristics** |
| 199 | | Characteristic | Points to SQL | Points to NoSQL | |
| 200 | |----------------|---------------|-----------------| |
| 201 | | Structured with relationships | ✓ | | |
| 202 | | ACID transactions required | ✓ | | |
| 203 | | Flexible/evolving schema | | ✓ | |
| 204 | | Document-oriented data | | ✓ | |
| 205 | | Time-series data | | ✓ (specialized) | |
| 206 | |
| 207 | **Step 2: Evaluate scale requirements** |
| 208 | <1M records, single region → PostgreSQL or MySQL |
| 209 | 1M-100M records, read-heavy → PostgreSQL with read replicas |
| 210 | >100M records, global distribution → CockroachDB, Spanner, or DynamoDB |
| 211 | High write throughput (>10K/sec) → Cassandra or ScyllaDB |
| 212 | |
| 213 | **Step 3: Check consistency requirements** |
| 214 | Strong consistency required → SQL or CockroachDB |
| 215 | Eventual consistency acceptable → DynamoDB, Cassandra, MongoDB |
| 216 | |
| 217 | **Step 4: Document decision** |
| 218 | Create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) with: |
| 219 | Context and requirements |
| 220 | Options considered |
| 221 | Decision and rationale |
| 222 | Trade-offs accepted |
| 223 | |
| 224 | **Quick reference:** |
| 225 | |
| 226 | PostgreSQL → Default choice for most applications |
| 227 | MongoDB → Document store, flexible schema |
| 228 | Redis → Caching, sessions, real-time features |
| 229 | DynamoDB → Serverless, auto-scaling, AWS-native |
| 230 | TimescaleDB → Time-series data with SQL interface |
| 231 | |
| 232 | |
| 233 | |
| 234 | |
| 235 | ### Architecture Pattern Selection Workflow |
| 236 | |
| 237 | Use when designing a new system or refactoring existing architecture. |
| 238 | |
| 239 | **Step 1: Assess team and project size** |
| 240 | | Team Size | Recommended Starting Point | |
| 241 | |-----------|---------------------------| |
| 242 | | 1-3 developers | Modular monolith | |
| 243 | | 4-10 developers | Modular monolith or service-oriented | |
| 244 | | 10+ developers | Consider microservices | |
| 245 | |
| 246 | **Step 2: Evaluate deployment requirements** |
| 247 | Single deployment unit acceptable → Monolith |
| 248 | Independent scaling needed → Microservices |
| 249 | Mixed (some services scale differently) → Hybrid |
| 250 | |
| 251 | **Step 3: Consider data boundaries** |
| 252 | Shared database acceptable → Monolith or modular monolith |
| 253 | Strict data isolation required → Microservices with separate DBs |
| 254 | Event-driven communication fits → Event-sourcing/CQRS |
| 255 | |
| 256 | **Step 4: Match pattern to requirements** |
| 257 | |
| 258 | | Requirement | Recommended Pattern | |
| 259 | |-------------|-------------------| |
| 260 | | Rapid MVP development | Modular Monolith | |
| 261 | | Independent team deployment | Microservices | |
| 262 | | Complex domain logic | Domain-Driven Design | |
| 263 | | High read/write ratio difference | CQRS | |
| 264 | | Audit trail required | Event Sourcing | |
| 265 | | Third-party integrations | Hexagonal/Ports & Adapters | |
| 266 | |
| 267 | See `references/architecture_patterns.md` for detailed pattern descriptions. |
| 268 | |
| 269 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | ### Monolith vs Microservices Decision |
| 272 | |
| 273 | **Choose Monolith when:** |
| 274 | [ ] Team is small (<10 developers) |
| 275 | [ ] Domain boundaries are unclear |
| 276 | [ ] Rapid iteration is priority |
| 277 | [ ] Operational complexity must be minimized |
| 278 | [ ] Shared database is acceptable |
| 279 | |
| 280 | **Choose Microservices when:** |
| 281 | [ ] Teams can own services end-to-end |
| 282 | [ ] Independent deployment is critical |
| 283 | [ ] Different scaling requirements per component |
| 284 | [ ] Technology diversity is needed |
| 285 | [ ] Domain boundaries are well understood |
| 286 | |
| 287 | **Hybrid approach:** |
| 288 | Start with a modular monolith. Extract services only when: |
| 289 | A module has significantly different scaling needs |
| 290 | A team needs independent deployment |
| 291 | Technology constraints require separation |
| 292 | |
| 293 | |
| 294 | |
| 295 | ## Reference Documentation |
| 296 | |
| 297 | Load these files for detailed information: |
| 298 | |
| 299 | | File | Contains | Load when user asks about | |
| 300 | |------|----------|--------------------------| |
| 301 | | `references/architecture_patterns.md` | 9 architecture patterns with trade-offs, code examples, and when to use | "which pattern?", "microservices vs monolith", "event-driven", "CQRS" | |
| 302 | | `references/system_design_workflows.md` | 6 step-by-step workflows for system design tasks | "how to design?", "capacity planning", "API design", "migration" | |
| 303 | | `references/tech_decision_guide.md` | Decision matrices for technology choices | "which database?", "which framework?", "which cloud?", "which cache?" | |
| 304 | |
| 305 | |
| 306 | |
| 307 | ## Tech Stack Coverage |
| 308 | |
| 309 | **Languages:** TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust |
| 310 | **Frontend:** React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, React Native, Flutter |
| 311 | **Backend:** Node.js, Express, FastAPI, Go, GraphQL, REST |
| 312 | **Databases:** PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, DynamoDB, Cassandra |
| 313 | **Infrastructure:** Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS, GCP, Azure |
| 314 | **CI/CD:** GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins |
| 315 | |
| 316 | |
| 317 | |
| 318 | ## Common Commands |
| 319 | |
| 320 | |
| 321 | # Architecture visualization |
| 322 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format mermaid |
| 323 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format plantuml |
| 324 | python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format ascii |
| 325 | |
| 326 | # Dependency analysis |
| 327 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --verbose |
| 328 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --check circular |
| 329 | python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --output json |
| 330 | |
| 331 | # Architecture assessment |
| 332 | python scripts/project_architect.py . --verbose |
| 333 | python scripts/project_architect.py . --check layers |
| 334 | python scripts/project_architect.py . --output json |
| 335 | |
| 336 | |
| 337 | |
| 338 | |
| 339 | ## Getting Help |
| 340 | |
| 341 | Run any script with `--help` for usage information |
| 342 | Check reference documentation for detailed patterns and workflows |
| 343 | Use `--verbose` flag for detailed explanations and recommendations |
| 344 |
Discussion
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Development.