Product discovery
Use when validating product opportunities, mapping assumptions, planning discovery sprints, or testing problem-solution fit before committing delivery resources.
How to use it
Claude Code
- Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into
~/.claude/skills/product-discovery. - Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit alirezarezvani/claude-skills/product-team/skills/product-discovery#main ~/.claude/skills/product-discoveryFor one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/product-discovery.
Claude (web or desktop app)
- On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
- Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
- Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
- Check the skill is switched on.
- Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
- ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
- Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
- Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
- Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.
Source of Product discovery
Show the full text115 lines
| name | description |
|---|---|
| product-discovery | Use when validating product opportunities, mapping assumptions, planning discovery sprints, or testing problem-solution fit before committing delivery resources. |
Product Discovery
Run structured discovery to identify high-value opportunities and de-risk product bets.
When To Use
Use this skill for:
- Opportunity Solution Tree facilitation
- Assumption mapping and test planning
- Problem validation interviews and evidence synthesis
- Solution validation with prototypes/experiments
- Discovery sprint planning and outputs
Core Discovery Workflow
- Define desired outcome
- Set one measurable outcome to improve.
- Establish baseline and target horizon.
- Build Opportunity Solution Tree (OST)
- Outcome -> opportunities -> solution ideas -> experiments
- Keep opportunities grounded in user evidence, not internal opinions.
- Map assumptions
- Identify desirability, viability, feasibility, and usability assumptions.
- Score assumptions by risk and certainty.
Use:
python3 scripts/assumption_mapper.py assumptions.csv
- Validate the problem
- Conduct interviews and behavior analysis.
- Confirm frequency, severity, and willingness to solve.
- Reject weak opportunities early.
- Validate the solution
- Prototype before building.
- Run concept, usability, and value tests.
- Measure behavior, not only stated preference.
- Plan discovery sprint
- 1-2 week cycle with explicit hypotheses
- Daily evidence reviews
- End with decision: proceed, pivot, or stop
Opportunity Solution Tree (Teresa Torres)
Structure:
- Outcome: metric you want to move
- Opportunities: unmet customer needs/pains
- Solutions: candidate interventions
- Experiments: fastest learning actions
Quality checks:
- At least 3 distinct opportunities before converging.
- At least 2 experiments per top opportunity.
- Tie every branch to evidence source.
Assumption Mapping
Assumption categories:
- Desirability: users want this
- Viability: business value exists
- Feasibility: team can build/operate it
- Usability: users can successfully use it
Prioritization rule:
- High risk + low certainty assumptions are tested first.
Problem Validation Techniques
- Problem interviews focused on current behavior
- Journey friction mapping
- Support ticket and sales-call synthesis
- Behavioral analytics triangulation
Evidence threshold examples:
- Same pain repeated across multiple target users
- Observable workaround behavior
- Measurable cost of current pain
Solution Validation Techniques
- Concept tests (value proposition comprehension)
- Prototype usability tests (task success/time-to-complete)
- Fake door or concierge tests (demand signal)
- Limited beta cohorts (retention/activation signals)
Discovery Sprint Planning
Suggested 10-day structure:
- Day 1-2: Outcome + opportunity framing
- Day 3-4: Assumption mapping + test design
- Day 5-7: Problem and solution tests
- Day 8-9: Evidence synthesis + decision options
- Day 10: Stakeholder decision review
Tooling
scripts/assumption_mapper.py
CLI utility that:
- reads assumptions from CSV or inline input
- scores risk/certainty priority
- emits prioritized test plan with suggested test types
See references/discovery-frameworks.md for framework details.
| 1 | |
| 2 | name product-discovery |
| 3 | description Use when validating product opportunities, mapping assumptions, planning discovery sprints, or testing problem-solution fit before committing delivery resources. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Product Discovery |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Run structured discovery to identify high-value opportunities and de-risk product bets. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## When To Use |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Use this skill for: |
| 13 | Opportunity Solution Tree facilitation |
| 14 | Assumption mapping and test planning |
| 15 | Problem validation interviews and evidence synthesis |
| 16 | Solution validation with prototypes/experiments |
| 17 | Discovery sprint planning and outputs |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ## Core Discovery Workflow |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Define desired outcome |
| 22 | Set one measurable outcome to improve. |
| 23 | Establish baseline and target horizon. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | Build Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) |
| 26 | Outcome -> opportunities -> solution ideas -> experiments |
| 27 | Keep opportunities grounded in user evidence, not internal opinions. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | Map assumptions |
| 30 | Identify desirability, viability, feasibility, and usability assumptions. |
| 31 | Score assumptions by risk and certainty. |
| 32 | |
| 33 | Use: |
| 34 | |
| 35 | python3 scripts/assumption_mapper.py assumptions.csv |
| 36 | |
| 37 | |
| 38 | Validate the problem |
| 39 | Conduct interviews and behavior analysis. |
| 40 | Confirm frequency, severity, and willingness to solve. |
| 41 | Reject weak opportunities early. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Validate the solution |
| 44 | Prototype before building. |
| 45 | Run concept, usability, and value tests. |
| 46 | Measure behavior, not only stated preference. |
| 47 | |
| 48 | Plan discovery sprint |
| 49 | 1-2 week cycle with explicit hypotheses |
| 50 | Daily evidence reviews |
| 51 | End with decision: proceed, pivot, or stop |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ## Opportunity Solution Tree (Teresa Torres) |
| 54 | |
| 55 | Structure: |
| 56 | Outcome: metric you want to move |
| 57 | Opportunities: unmet customer needs/pains |
| 58 | Solutions: candidate interventions |
| 59 | Experiments: fastest learning actions |
| 60 | |
| 61 | Quality checks: |
| 62 | At least 3 distinct opportunities before converging. |
| 63 | At least 2 experiments per top opportunity. |
| 64 | Tie every branch to evidence source. |
| 65 | |
| 66 | ## Assumption Mapping |
| 67 | |
| 68 | Assumption categories: |
| 69 | Desirability: users want this |
| 70 | Viability: business value exists |
| 71 | Feasibility: team can build/operate it |
| 72 | Usability: users can successfully use it |
| 73 | |
| 74 | Prioritization rule: |
| 75 | High risk + low certainty assumptions are tested first. |
| 76 | |
| 77 | ## Problem Validation Techniques |
| 78 | |
| 79 | Problem interviews focused on current behavior |
| 80 | Journey friction mapping |
| 81 | Support ticket and sales-call synthesis |
| 82 | Behavioral analytics triangulation |
| 83 | |
| 84 | Evidence threshold examples: |
| 85 | Same pain repeated across multiple target users |
| 86 | Observable workaround behavior |
| 87 | Measurable cost of current pain |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ## Solution Validation Techniques |
| 90 | |
| 91 | Concept tests (value proposition comprehension) |
| 92 | Prototype usability tests (task success/time-to-complete) |
| 93 | Fake door or concierge tests (demand signal) |
| 94 | Limited beta cohorts (retention/activation signals) |
| 95 | |
| 96 | ## Discovery Sprint Planning |
| 97 | |
| 98 | Suggested 10-day structure: |
| 99 | Day 1-2: Outcome + opportunity framing |
| 100 | Day 3-4: Assumption mapping + test design |
| 101 | Day 5-7: Problem and solution tests |
| 102 | Day 8-9: Evidence synthesis + decision options |
| 103 | Day 10: Stakeholder decision review |
| 104 | |
| 105 | ## Tooling |
| 106 | |
| 107 | ### `scripts/assumption_mapper.py` |
| 108 | |
| 109 | CLI utility that: |
| 110 | reads assumptions from CSV or inline input |
| 111 | scores risk/certainty priority |
| 112 | emits prioritized test plan with suggested test types |
| 113 | |
| 114 | See `references/discovery-frameworks.md` for framework details. |
| 115 |
Discussion
🏛️ Tax Strategist AgentExpert tax strategist specializing in tax optimization, multi-jurisdictional compliance, transfer pricing, and strategic tax planning. Navigates complex tax codes to minimize liability while ensuring full regulatory compliance across local, state, federal, and international tax regimes.📈 FP&A Analyst AgentExpert Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) analyst specializing in budgeting, variance analysis, financial planning, rolling forecasts, and strategic decision support. Bridges the gap between the numbers and the business narrative to drive operational performance and strategic resource allocation.📊 Financial Analyst AgentExpert financial analyst specializing in financial modeling, forecasting, scenario analysis, and data-driven decision support. Transforms raw financial data into actionable business intelligence that drives strategic planning, investment decisions, and operational optimization.Career changer translatorTranslate skills from one industry to another, identify transferable skills
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Product.