MQL Nurture Programs skill
Builds MQL nurture programs: lead scoring, nurture tracks by persona and stage, email drips, and MQL-to-SQL handoff rules.
by LeadMagic·MIT license·★ 62 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗
npx degit LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/lifecycle/mql-nurture#main ~/.claude/skills/mql-nurtureChecked ·commit main
Inside this skill
SKILL.md · the author's own words# MQL Nurture Programs ## Overview Most MQLs aren't ready to buy — they're researching. Nurture programs keep your company top-of-mind during the 3-12 month evaluation window, converting MQLs to SQLs at 2-3x the rate of "send them to sales and pray." This skill covers nurture strategy, track design, and optimization. ## Authoritative Foundations - **Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall** — Define inquiry → MQL → SAL → SQL stages with explicit handoff criteria and SLAs betw… - **Adobe Marketo Engage — Engagement programs** — Run nurture as streams with cadence controls and exhaustion rules so leads are not over-… - **HubSpot Knowledge Base — Lead scoring** — Combine fit and engagement scores, and decay engagement over time so stale activity does not… ## Lifecycle Stage
Word-for-word excerpt, not a result. Read the full SKILL.md ↓
Files of MQL Nurture Programs
Show the full text170 lines
MQL Nurture Programs
Overview
Most MQLs aren't ready to buy — they're researching. Nurture programs keep your company top-of-mind during the 3-12 month evaluation window, converting MQLs to SQLs at 2-3x the rate of "send them to sales and pray." This skill covers nurture strategy, track design, and optimization.
Authoritative Foundations
- Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall — Define inquiry → MQL → SAL → SQL stages with explicit handoff criteria and SLAs between marketing and sales.
- Adobe Marketo Engage — Engagement programs — Run nurture as streams with cadence controls and exhaustion rules so leads are not over-mailed.
- HubSpot Knowledge Base — Lead scoring — Combine fit and engagement scores, and decay engagement over time so stale activity does not create MQLs.
Lifecycle Stage
Acquisition (stage 2). Canonical index → references/gtm-lifecycle-stages.md.
Metrics → references/lifecycle-metrics-by-stage.md (Acquisition).
Monitoring → the gtm-metrics skill (lifecycle-monitoring-dashboard.md).
When to Use
- "Build an MQL nurture program"
- "Lead nurture strategy"
- "MQL to SQL conversion"
- "Nurture email drips"
- "Lead scoring for nurture"
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Lead Scoring Model
Define what makes an MQL:
Fit Score (0-50):
- Job title matches ICP (0-20)
- Company size in target range (0-15)
- Industry in target vertical (0-15)
Engagement Score (0-50):
- Content downloads (5 pts each)
- Website visits >5 pages (10 pts)
- Webinar attendance (15 pts)
- Pricing page visit (20 pts)
- Demo request (50 pts — auto-SQL)
MQL Threshold: Combined score >40 → MQL → enter nurture. SQL Threshold: Combined score >70 → SQL → route to sales.
Phase 2: Nurture Track Design
Create persona-specific nurture tracks:
Track 1 — The Researcher (downloaded educational content):
- Week 1: "Thanks for downloading [resource] — here's a related template"
- Week 2: Customer story from same industry
- Week 4: Webinar invite: "How [Industry] teams solve [problem]"
- Week 6: Benchmark report: "2026 [Industry] benchmarks"
- Week 8: "Ready to see how this works?" → soft CTA for demo
Track 2 — The Evaluator (visited pricing/comparison pages):
- Week 1: "How [Company A] evaluated [category] tools" (buyer's guide)
- Week 2: ROI calculator + case study with specific ROI numbers
- Week 3: "[Your product] vs [Competitor]" comparison
- Week 4: Demo invite: "See it in action with your data"
- Week 5: "Still evaluating?" + customer reference offer
Track 3 — The Event Attendee (attended webinar):
- Day 1: Recording + slide deck + "top questions answered"
- Day 3: Related case study
- Day 7: "The one thing most people miss about [topic]"
- Day 14: Soft CTA: "Want to discuss [topic] for your specific situation?"
Phase 3: Email Content Principles
- Value-first: 80% educational, 20% product. If every email is "book a demo," they unsubscribe.
- Progressive profiling: Each email asks for slightly more engagement. Click → download → webinar → demo.
- Personalization by source: Reference how they entered the funnel. "Since you downloaded our [guide]..."
- Behavioral triggers: If they click on pricing → shift to Evaluator track. If they stop opening → shift to re-engagement.
Phase 4: Multi-Channel Nurture
Layer channels beyond email:
- LinkedIn: Connect with MQLs. Share content they engage with.
- Retargeting: Show case study ads to content downloaders. Show demo ads to pricing page visitors.
- Direct mail: For high-value MQLs (>$50K potential ACV), send a physical asset (book, report, tool).
- Sales calls: SDR calls MQLs at specific nurture milestones (after webinar attendance, after pricing page visit).
Phase 5: Optimization
- Track performance: Open rate, click rate, conversion to SQL, conversion to opportunity, revenue influenced
- A/B test: Subject lines, content formats (text vs video vs infographic), send frequency, CTA phrasing
- Cadence optimization: Too fast = unsubscribes. Too slow = they forget you. Start at 7-14 day intervals and adjust based on engagement.
- Exit criteria: Auto-remove from nurture after 6 months of no engagement. Move to re-engagement track.
- Dead lead management: After 12 months of no engagement, suppress from all nurture. Maintain in database for reactivation plays.
Output Format
Nurture program design with: lead scoring model, track definitions, email sequences per track, multi-channel integration, and optimization framework.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- Fit + engagement scoring model is two-dimensional — no single-criterion MQL thresholds
- At least 3 nurture tracks defined with distinct entry signals, cadences, and exit CTAs
- Behavioral branching rules exist — pricing click → Evaluator track; no opens 30 days → re-engagement
- Multi-channel layering is specified (email primary, LinkedIn for MQLs, retargeting by stage, direct mail for $50K+ ACV)
- 80/20 educational-to-product ratio enforced across all nurture content
- Exit criteria defined: auto-remove from nurture at 6 months no engagement; dead-lead suppression at 12 months
Common Pitfalls
- Single-track nurture. Every MQL gets the same drip regardless of source, persona, or buying stage. Fix: build at least 3 tracks gated by acquisition source — Researcher (content download), Evaluator (pricing/comparison page), Event Attendee (webinar).
- Product-heavy email ratio. Every email asks for a demo and provides zero educational value — unsubscribe rates climb. Fix: enforce 80/20 educational-to-product ratio; the 5th email in a track should be the first hard CTA.
- No behavioral branching. Contacts keep receiving email #4 when they never opened #1. Fix: implement engagement-based routing — no opens for 30 days triggers re-engagement track; pricing page visit triggers Evaluator track.
- Forever nurture. Contacts in nurture for 18 months with no engagement drain sender reputation and ESP budget. Fix: hard exit at 6 months of no engagement; suppress from all nurture at 12 months; retain in database for reactivation plays only.
- MQL definition drift. Without a locked scoring model, 'MQL' becomes whatever sales asks for this week. Fix: publish the scoring model, lock thresholds (MQL >40, SQL >70), and require RevOps sign-off to change weights.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validator Canonical lifecycle:references/gtm-lifecycle-stages.md(Acquisition) ·references/lifecycle-metrics-by-stage.md·references/lifecycle-skill-index.md
Related Skills
- inbound-triage, lifecycle-drips, re-engagement, email-deliverability, campaign-analytics
| 1 | |
| 2 | name mql-nurture |
| 3 | description >- |
| 4 | Builds MQL nurture programs: lead scoring, nurture tracks by persona and |
| 5 | stage, email drips, and MQL-to-SQL handoff rules. Use when leads are not |
| 6 | converting to sales conversations, or the user is designing lead nurture or |
| 7 | lead scoring. Triggers on: "MQL nurture", "lead nurture", "nurture tracks", |
| 8 | "MQL to SQL", "lead scoring". |
| 9 | license MIT |
| 10 | compatibility Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed |
| 11 | metadata |
| 12 | version "1.0.0" |
| 13 | author LeadMagic |
| 14 | category lifecycle |
| 15 | tags [lifecycle, nurture, MQL, lead-scoring, email-drips] |
| 16 | frameworks |
| 17 | - "Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall" |
| 18 | - "Adobe Marketo Engage — Engagement programs" |
| 19 | - "HubSpot Knowledge Base — Lead scoring" |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | # MQL Nurture Programs |
| 23 | |
| 24 | ## Overview |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Most MQLs aren't ready to buy — they're researching. Nurture programs keep your |
| 27 | company top-of-mind during the 3-12 month evaluation window, converting MQLs to |
| 28 | SQLs at 2-3x the rate of "send them to sales and pray." This skill covers nurture |
| 29 | strategy, track design, and optimization. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ## Authoritative Foundations |
| 32 | **Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall** — Define inquiry → MQL → SAL → SQL stages with explicit handoff criteria and SLAs between marketing and sales. |
| 33 | **Adobe Marketo Engage — Engagement programs** — Run nurture as streams with cadence controls and exhaustion rules so leads are not over-mailed. |
| 34 | **HubSpot Knowledge Base — Lead scoring** — Combine fit and engagement scores, and decay engagement over time so stale activity does not create MQLs. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | ## Lifecycle Stage |
| 37 | |
| 38 | **Acquisition** (stage 2). Canonical index → `references/gtm-lifecycle-stages.md`. |
| 39 | Metrics → `references/lifecycle-metrics-by-stage.md` (Acquisition). |
| 40 | Monitoring → the `gtm-metrics` skill (lifecycle-monitoring-dashboard.md). |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ## When to Use |
| 43 | |
| 44 | "Build an MQL nurture program" |
| 45 | "Lead nurture strategy" |
| 46 | "MQL to SQL conversion" |
| 47 | "Nurture email drips" |
| 48 | "Lead scoring for nurture" |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ## Step-by-Step Process |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### Phase 1: Lead Scoring Model |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Define what makes an MQL: |
| 55 | |
| 56 | **Fit Score (0-50):** |
| 57 | |
| 58 | Job title matches ICP (0-20) |
| 59 | Company size in target range (0-15) |
| 60 | Industry in target vertical (0-15) |
| 61 | |
| 62 | **Engagement Score (0-50):** |
| 63 | |
| 64 | Content downloads (5 pts each) |
| 65 | Website visits >5 pages (10 pts) |
| 66 | Webinar attendance (15 pts) |
| 67 | Pricing page visit (20 pts) |
| 68 | Demo request (50 pts — auto-SQL) |
| 69 | |
| 70 | **MQL Threshold:** Combined score >40 → MQL → enter nurture. |
| 71 | **SQL Threshold:** Combined score >70 → SQL → route to sales. |
| 72 | |
| 73 | ### Phase 2: Nurture Track Design |
| 74 | |
| 75 | Create persona-specific nurture tracks: |
| 76 | |
| 77 | **Track 1 — The Researcher (downloaded educational content):** |
| 78 | |
| 79 | Week 1: "Thanks for downloading [resource] — here's a related template" |
| 80 | Week 2: Customer story from same industry |
| 81 | Week 4: Webinar invite: "How [Industry] teams solve [problem]" |
| 82 | Week 6: Benchmark report: "2026 [Industry] benchmarks" |
| 83 | Week 8: "Ready to see how this works?" → soft CTA for demo |
| 84 | |
| 85 | **Track 2 — The Evaluator (visited pricing/comparison pages):** |
| 86 | |
| 87 | Week 1: "How [Company A] evaluated [category] tools" (buyer's guide) |
| 88 | Week 2: ROI calculator + case study with specific ROI numbers |
| 89 | Week 3: "[Your product] vs [Competitor]" comparison |
| 90 | Week 4: Demo invite: "See it in action with your data" |
| 91 | Week 5: "Still evaluating?" + customer reference offer |
| 92 | |
| 93 | **Track 3 — The Event Attendee (attended webinar):** |
| 94 | |
| 95 | Day 1: Recording + slide deck + "top questions answered" |
| 96 | Day 3: Related case study |
| 97 | Day 7: "The one thing most people miss about [topic]" |
| 98 | Day 14: Soft CTA: "Want to discuss [topic] for your specific situation?" |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ### Phase 3: Email Content Principles |
| 101 | |
| 102 | **Value-first:** 80% educational, 20% product. If every email is "book a demo," |
| 103 | they unsubscribe. |
| 104 | **Progressive profiling:** Each email asks for slightly more engagement. |
| 105 | Click → download → webinar → demo. |
| 106 | **Personalization by source:** Reference how they entered the funnel. |
| 107 | "Since you downloaded our [guide]..." |
| 108 | **Behavioral triggers:** If they click on pricing → shift to Evaluator track. |
| 109 | If they stop opening → shift to re-engagement. |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ### Phase 4: Multi-Channel Nurture |
| 112 | |
| 113 | Layer channels beyond email: |
| 114 | |
| 115 | **LinkedIn:** Connect with MQLs. Share content they engage with. |
| 116 | **Retargeting:** Show case study ads to content downloaders. Show demo ads |
| 117 | to pricing page visitors. |
| 118 | **Direct mail:** For high-value MQLs (>$50K potential ACV), send a physical |
| 119 | asset (book, report, tool). |
| 120 | **Sales calls:** SDR calls MQLs at specific nurture milestones |
| 121 | (after webinar attendance, after pricing page visit). |
| 122 | |
| 123 | ### Phase 5: Optimization |
| 124 | |
| 125 | **Track performance:** Open rate, click rate, conversion to SQL, conversion |
| 126 | to opportunity, revenue influenced |
| 127 | **A/B test:** Subject lines, content formats (text vs video vs infographic), |
| 128 | send frequency, CTA phrasing |
| 129 | **Cadence optimization:** Too fast = unsubscribes. Too slow = they forget you. |
| 130 | Start at 7-14 day intervals and adjust based on engagement. |
| 131 | **Exit criteria:** Auto-remove from nurture after 6 months of no engagement. |
| 132 | Move to re-engagement track. |
| 133 | **Dead lead management:** After 12 months of no engagement, suppress from all |
| 134 | nurture. Maintain in database for reactivation plays. |
| 135 | |
| 136 | ## Output Format |
| 137 | |
| 138 | Nurture program design with: lead scoring model, track definitions, email |
| 139 | sequences per track, multi-channel integration, and optimization framework. |
| 140 | |
| 141 | ## Quality Check |
| 142 | |
| 143 | Before delivering, verify: |
| 144 | |
| 145 | [ ] Fit + engagement scoring model is two-dimensional — no single-criterion MQL thresholds |
| 146 | [ ] At least 3 nurture tracks defined with distinct entry signals, cadences, and exit CTAs |
| 147 | [ ] Behavioral branching rules exist — pricing click → Evaluator track; no opens 30 days → re-engagement |
| 148 | [ ] Multi-channel layering is specified (email primary, LinkedIn for MQLs, retargeting by stage, direct mail for $50K+ ACV) |
| 149 | [ ] 80/20 educational-to-product ratio enforced across all nurture content |
| 150 | [ ] Exit criteria defined: auto-remove from nurture at 6 months no engagement; dead-lead suppression at 12 months |
| 151 | |
| 152 | ## Common Pitfalls |
| 153 | |
| 154 | **Single-track nurture.** Every MQL gets the same drip regardless of source, persona, or buying stage. Fix: build at least 3 tracks gated by acquisition source — Researcher (content download), Evaluator (pricing/comparison page), Event Attendee (webinar). |
| 155 | **Product-heavy email ratio.** Every email asks for a demo and provides zero educational value — unsubscribe rates climb. Fix: enforce 80/20 educational-to-product ratio; the 5th email in a track should be the first hard CTA. |
| 156 | **No behavioral branching.** Contacts keep receiving email #4 when they never opened #1. Fix: implement engagement-based routing — no opens for 30 days triggers re-engagement track; pricing page visit triggers Evaluator track. |
| 157 | **Forever nurture.** Contacts in nurture for 18 months with no engagement drain sender reputation and ESP budget. Fix: hard exit at 6 months of no engagement; suppress from all nurture at 12 months; retain in database for reactivation plays only. |
| 158 | **MQL definition drift.** Without a locked scoring model, 'MQL' becomes whatever sales asks for this week. Fix: publish the scoring model, lock thresholds (MQL >40, SQL >70), and require RevOps sign-off to change weights. |
| 159 | |
| 160 | ## Execution Artifacts |
| 161 | |
| 162 | `references/framework-notes.md` — Named frameworks and reference tables |
| 163 | `templates/output-template.md` — Deliverable shell for agent output |
| 164 | `scripts/check-output.py` — Lightweight deliverable validator |
| 165 | **Canonical lifecycle:** `references/gtm-lifecycle-stages.md` (Acquisition) · `references/lifecycle-metrics-by-stage.md` · `references/lifecycle-skill-index.md` |
| 166 | |
| 167 | ## Related Skills |
| 168 | |
| 169 | inbound-triage, lifecycle-drips, re-engagement, email-deliverability, campaign-analytics |
| 170 |
Discussion
Alternatives
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Sales.