/digital-marketing-pro:lead-magnet-ideas skill

Generate 3-5 lead magnet ideas from the brand's assets, graded by effort and power.

by indranilbanerjee·MIT license·★ 866 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Inside this skill

SKILL.md · the author's own words
# /digital-marketing-pro:lead-magnet-ideas

The bridge between content that earns attention and a funnel that captures it.
A good lead magnet is not "an ebook" — it is the specific artifact this
audience would trade an email for, on this topic, from this brand, buildable
with what the brand already has.

## Inputs

- **The topic** — a subject, a campaign, or an existing piece the magnet
  should extend.
- **The brand profile** — audience, expertise, existing assets, funnel stage
  from `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/`. The best magnets are cut from IP
  the brand already owns: the internal checklist, the template they use on
  every engagement, the dataset nobody else has.
- `--max-effort` — cap suggestions at what the team can actually build.

Word-for-word excerpt, not a result. Read the full SKILL.md ↓

Files of /digital-marketing-pro:lead-magnet-ideas

indranilbanerjee/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text79 lines

/digital-marketing-pro:lead-magnet-ideas

The bridge between content that earns attention and a funnel that captures it. A good lead magnet is not "an ebook" — it is the specific artifact this audience would trade an email for, on this topic, from this brand, buildable with what the brand already has.

Inputs

  • The topic — a subject, a campaign, or an existing piece the magnet should extend.
  • The brand profile — audience, expertise, existing assets, funnel stage from ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/. The best magnets are cut from IP the brand already owns: the internal checklist, the template they use on every engagement, the dataset nobody else has.
  • --max-effort — cap suggestions at what the team can actually build.

The grading matrix

Every idea is graded on two axes, stated with reasons — ungraded idea lists outsource the real decision back to the user:

Grade Lead-gen power Build effort
A Audience actively searches for this; clear next step toward the offer Assembled from existing assets in hours
B Wanted once seen; adjacent to the buying decision Days; some new material
C Nice-to-have; collects curiosity, not intent A real project

The sweet spot is power-A × effort-A: the artifact the brand already uses internally, packaged. Flag any power-C × effort-C idea as not worth building.

Output structure

# Lead magnets — [topic], {brand}

## 1. [Specific name — "The 23-point pre-launch QA checklist", never "a checklist"]
**What it is:** [2-3 sentences — contents, format, length]
**Cut from:** [the existing brand asset or expertise it is built from]
**Power: A/B/C** — [why: search demand, intent proximity, offer fit]
**Effort: A/B/C** — [why: what exists vs what must be made]
**Funnel fit:** [what it qualifies the lead FOR — the next step it sets up]
**Delivery:** [landing page + email / in-content unlock / webinar follow-up]

[... 3-5 ideas, best power-to-effort ratio first ...]

## Not recommended
[Ideas that look obvious for this topic but grade badly here, with the grade —
pre-empting the "what about an ebook?" conversation]

## Next steps
[Route onward: /digital-marketing-pro:email-sequence for the nurture that
follows capture; /digital-marketing-pro:funnel-architect if there is nowhere
to send the lead yet]

Critical rules

  • Specific, or it does not ship. Every idea carries a name a designer could brief from. "A template" is a category; "the client-onboarding email sequence template with the 6 send-day rules annotated" is an idea.
  • Tied to existing IP first. An idea requiring expertise the brand does not demonstrably have is graded effort-C and flagged — a magnet the brand cannot credibly deliver damages the exact trust it exists to build.
  • Grade honestly, both axes, with reasons. The grades are the deliverable; the ideas are commodity.
  • A magnet must lead somewhere. Each idea names what it qualifies the lead for. Capture with no next step is a list nobody emails.
  • Compliance applies. Gated content in regulated industries carries the same disclaimer and claims rules as published content — a magnet is not a compliance side door.
1---
2name: lead-magnet-ideas
3description: "Generate 3-5 lead magnet ideas from the brand's assets, graded by effort and power. \"what should we give away\""
4argument-hint: "[brand-name] [--topic <topic or piece>] [--max-effort low|medium|high]"
5user-invocable: true
6---
7 
8# /digital-marketing-pro:lead-magnet-ideas
9 
10The bridge between content that earns attention and a funnel that captures it.
11A good lead magnet is not "an ebook" — it is the specific artifact this
12audience would trade an email for, on this topic, from this brand, buildable
13with what the brand already has.
14 
15## Inputs
16 
17- **The topic** — a subject, a campaign, or an existing piece the magnet
18 should extend.
19- **The brand profile** — audience, expertise, existing assets, funnel stage
20 from `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/`. The best magnets are cut from IP
21 the brand already owns: the internal checklist, the template they use on
22 every engagement, the dataset nobody else has.
23- `--max-effort` — cap suggestions at what the team can actually build.
24 
25## The grading matrix
26 
27Every idea is graded on two axes, stated with reasons — ungraded idea lists
28outsource the real decision back to the user:
29 
30| Grade | Lead-gen power | Build effort |
31|---|---|---|
32| **A** | Audience actively searches for this; clear next step toward the offer | Assembled from existing assets in hours |
33| **B** | Wanted once seen; adjacent to the buying decision | Days; some new material |
34| **C** | Nice-to-have; collects curiosity, not intent | A real project |
35 
36The sweet spot is power-A × effort-A: the artifact the brand already uses
37internally, packaged. Flag any power-C × effort-C idea as not worth building.
38 
39## Output structure
40 
41```
42# Lead magnets — [topic], {brand}
43 
44## 1. [Specific name — "The 23-point pre-launch QA checklist", never "a checklist"]
45**What it is:** [2-3 sentences — contents, format, length]
46**Cut from:** [the existing brand asset or expertise it is built from]
47**Power: A/B/C** — [why: search demand, intent proximity, offer fit]
48**Effort: A/B/C** — [why: what exists vs what must be made]
49**Funnel fit:** [what it qualifies the lead FOR — the next step it sets up]
50**Delivery:** [landing page + email / in-content unlock / webinar follow-up]
51 
52[... 3-5 ideas, best power-to-effort ratio first ...]
53 
54## Not recommended
55[Ideas that look obvious for this topic but grade badly here, with the grade —
56pre-empting the "what about an ebook?" conversation]
57 
58## Next steps
59[Route onward: /digital-marketing-pro:email-sequence for the nurture that
60follows capture; /digital-marketing-pro:funnel-architect if there is nowhere
61to send the lead yet]
62```
63 
64## Critical rules
65 
66- **Specific, or it does not ship.** Every idea carries a name a designer
67 could brief from. "A template" is a category; "the client-onboarding email
68 sequence template with the 6 send-day rules annotated" is an idea.
69- **Tied to existing IP first.** An idea requiring expertise the brand does
70 not demonstrably have is graded effort-C and flagged — a magnet the brand
71 cannot credibly deliver damages the exact trust it exists to build.
72- **Grade honestly, both axes, with reasons.** The grades are the deliverable;
73 the ideas are commodity.
74- **A magnet must lead somewhere.** Each idea names what it qualifies the lead
75 for. Capture with no next step is a list nobody emails.
76- **Compliance applies.** Gated content in regulated industries carries the
77 same disclaimer and claims rules as published content — a magnet is not a
78 compliance side door.
79 

Discussion