Integration partnerships skill
Builds go-to-market for technology integration partnerships: partner selection, integration launch plans, marketplace listings, and co-selling motions.
by LeadMagic·MIT license·★ 62 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗
npx degit LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/partnerships/integration-partnerships#main ~/.claude/skills/integration-partnershipsChecked ·commit main
Inside this skill
SKILL.md · the author's own words# Integration Partnerships ## Overview Technology integration partnerships are the highest-ROI partnership type for B2B SaaS. When your product integrates with a platform your ICP already uses, discovery happens inside their workflow. This skill covers integration strategy, GTM launch, marketplace presence, and co-selling. ## Authoritative Foundations - **Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth** — Prioritize integration partners by customer overlap and co-sell potential, not logo size. - **Salesforce AppExchange and HubSpot App Marketplace — Listing requirements** — Plan the security review, listing assets, and certificati… - **Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence** — Integrations extend the influence of every partner who recommends the tool; brie… ## When to Use
Word-for-word excerpt, not a result. Read the full SKILL.md ↓
Files of Integration partnerships
Show the full text178 lines
Integration Partnerships
Overview
Technology integration partnerships are the highest-ROI partnership type for B2B SaaS. When your product integrates with a platform your ICP already uses, discovery happens inside their workflow. This skill covers integration strategy, GTM launch, marketplace presence, and co-selling.
Authoritative Foundations
- Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth — Prioritize integration partners by customer overlap and co-sell potential, not logo size.
- Salesforce AppExchange and HubSpot App Marketplace — Listing requirements — Plan the security review, listing assets, and certification steps into the launch timeline.
- Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence — Integrations extend the influence of every partner who recommends the tool; brief partner teams, not only customers.
When to Use
- "Build integration partnerships"
- "Launch a tech partnership"
- "Get listed on a marketplace"
- "Integration GTM strategy"
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Integration Selection
Prioritize integrations by:
- ICP overlap: % of your ICP using this platform (score 1-10)
- Workflow adjacency: Does the integration happen where the user already is? (score 1-10)
- Build complexity: Hours to build a meaningful v1 integration
- Partnership openness: Does the platform have a partner program? marketplace?
- Revenue potential: Will this integration drive new deals or expand existing?
Score >35: Build now. Score 25-35: Build soon. Score <25: Deprioritize.
Phase 2: Integration Design
- Minimum Viable Integration (MVI): What's the one thing users need the integration to do? Ship that first. Don't build 10 features.
- Integration depth levels:
- Level 1: Data sync (push/pull data between systems)
- Level 2: Workflow trigger (event in system A triggers action in system B)
- Level 3: Embedded experience (your UI inside their product or vice versa)
- Level 4: Co-created product (new product built on the integration)
- Start at Level 1 or 2. Level 3-4 takes years of partnership maturity.
Phase 3: Partner GTM Launch
- Integration announcement: Blog post (both companies), email blast (both), social promotion (both), Product Hunt if appropriate
- Joint documentation: Setup guide with screenshots. < 5 minutes to activate.
- Co-branded landing page: "How [Partner] + [You] work together" with use cases
- Sales enablement: Both sales teams trained on the joint value prop. "If a prospect uses [Partner], mention our integration — it's often the reason they buy."
- Customer migration path: For prospects using a competitor + [Partner]: "Switch to [You] and keep your [Partner] integration — here's the migration guide."
Phase 4: Marketplace Presence
- App marketplace listing: High-quality listing with: logo, 1-line description, detailed description, screenshots, setup guide, reviews, support link
- Category optimization: List in the most relevant categories. Monitor category ranking weekly — it drives discovery.
- Reviews: Get 10+ reviews from mutual customers. Ask within 30 days of integration activation. Respond to every review.
- Featured placement: Negotiate featured/app-of-the-week placement with the platform's partner team. Requires relationship building.
Phase 5: Co-Selling
- Account mapping: Use Crossbeam/Reveal to identify shared accounts without sharing customer lists directly.
- Co-selling play: "We noticed you use [Partner]. Our integration with them enables [specific value]. Want to see it?"
- Partner-sourced deals: Formal deal registration so partners get credit for referring deals they identified through account mapping.
- Joint QBRs: Quarterly with top integration partners. Review shared pipeline, plan joint campaigns, align on roadmap.
Output Format
Integration partnership plan with: partner prioritization matrix, MVI spec, GTM launch checklist, marketplace optimization, and co-selling playbook.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- All required sections are complete
- Output matches the user's stated need
- Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations
- No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action
- Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual
Common Pitfalls
- Skipping research. Building output without understanding the specific context. Fix: always gather required inputs before producing deliverables.
- Generic output. "Improve your process" without concrete steps. Fix: every recommendation must include a specific action, timeline, and owner.
- Missing framework citations. Advice without named authorities. Fix: ground every recommendation in a cited framework from a recognized authority.
Implementation Depth
Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.
Diagnostic Questions
- What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?
- Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?
- What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?
- What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?
- What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?
Framework Application
Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:
- Technology Partnership Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Platform Ecosystem Strategy: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Crossbeam — Ecosystem-Led Growth: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
Deliverable Standard
A strong output from this skill includes:
- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation
- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list
- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan
- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators
- Risks and edge cases called out before execution
Adaptation Rules
- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.
- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.
- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validator
Related Skills
- partnership-strategy, co-marketing, leadmagic-integrations, api-enrichment, sales-enablement
| 1 | |
| 2 | name integration-partnerships |
| 3 | description >- |
| 4 | Builds go-to-market for technology integration partnerships: partner |
| 5 | selection, integration launch plans, marketplace listings, and co-selling |
| 6 | motions. Use when the user is launching an integration, getting listed on a |
| 7 | partner marketplace, or turning an integration into pipeline. Triggers on: |
| 8 | "integration partnership", "tech partnership", "API partnership", "marketplace |
| 9 | listing". |
| 10 | license MIT |
| 11 | compatibility Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed |
| 12 | metadata |
| 13 | version "1.0.0" |
| 14 | author LeadMagic |
| 15 | category partnerships |
| 16 | tags [partnerships, integrations, technology-partners, marketplace, API] |
| 17 | frameworks |
| 18 | - "Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth" |
| 19 | - "Salesforce AppExchange and HubSpot App Marketplace — Listing requirements" |
| 20 | - "Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence" |
| 21 | related_skills |
| 22 | [ |
| 23 | partnership-strategy, |
| 24 | co-marketing, |
| 25 | leadmagic-integrations, |
| 26 | api-enrichment, |
| 27 | sales-enablement, |
| 28 | ] |
| 29 | |
| 30 | |
| 31 | # Integration Partnerships |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ## Overview |
| 34 | |
| 35 | Technology integration partnerships are the highest-ROI partnership type for |
| 36 | B2B SaaS. When your product integrates with a platform your ICP already uses, |
| 37 | discovery happens inside their workflow. This skill covers integration strategy, |
| 38 | GTM launch, marketplace presence, and co-selling. |
| 39 | |
| 40 | ## Authoritative Foundations |
| 41 | **Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth** — Prioritize integration partners by customer overlap and co-sell potential, not logo size. |
| 42 | **Salesforce AppExchange and HubSpot App Marketplace — Listing requirements** — Plan the security review, listing assets, and certification steps into the launch timeline. |
| 43 | **Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence** — Integrations extend the influence of every partner who recommends the tool; brief partner teams, not only customers. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | ## When to Use |
| 46 | |
| 47 | "Build integration partnerships" |
| 48 | "Launch a tech partnership" |
| 49 | "Get listed on a marketplace" |
| 50 | "Integration GTM strategy" |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ## Step-by-Step Process |
| 53 | |
| 54 | ### Phase 1: Integration Selection |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Prioritize integrations by: |
| 57 | |
| 58 | **ICP overlap:** % of your ICP using this platform (score 1-10) |
| 59 | **Workflow adjacency:** Does the integration happen where the user already is? |
| 60 | (score 1-10) |
| 61 | **Build complexity:** Hours to build a meaningful v1 integration |
| 62 | **Partnership openness:** Does the platform have a partner program? marketplace? |
| 63 | **Revenue potential:** Will this integration drive new deals or expand existing? |
| 64 | |
| 65 | Score >35: Build now. Score 25-35: Build soon. Score <25: Deprioritize. |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ### Phase 2: Integration Design |
| 68 | |
| 69 | **Minimum Viable Integration (MVI):** What's the one thing users need the |
| 70 | integration to do? Ship that first. Don't build 10 features. |
| 71 | **Integration depth levels:** |
| 72 | Level 1: Data sync (push/pull data between systems) |
| 73 | Level 2: Workflow trigger (event in system A triggers action in system B) |
| 74 | Level 3: Embedded experience (your UI inside their product or vice versa) |
| 75 | Level 4: Co-created product (new product built on the integration) |
| 76 | **Start at Level 1 or 2.** Level 3-4 takes years of partnership maturity. |
| 77 | |
| 78 | ### Phase 3: Partner GTM Launch |
| 79 | |
| 80 | **Integration announcement:** Blog post (both companies), email blast (both), |
| 81 | social promotion (both), Product Hunt if appropriate |
| 82 | **Joint documentation:** Setup guide with screenshots. < 5 minutes to activate. |
| 83 | **Co-branded landing page:** "How [Partner] + [You] work together" with use cases |
| 84 | **Sales enablement:** Both sales teams trained on the joint value prop. |
| 85 | "If a prospect uses [Partner], mention our integration — it's often the reason |
| 86 | they buy." |
| 87 | **Customer migration path:** For prospects using a competitor + [Partner]: |
| 88 | "Switch to [You] and keep your [Partner] integration — here's the migration guide." |
| 89 | |
| 90 | ### Phase 4: Marketplace Presence |
| 91 | |
| 92 | **App marketplace listing:** High-quality listing with: logo, 1-line description, |
| 93 | detailed description, screenshots, setup guide, reviews, support link |
| 94 | **Category optimization:** List in the most relevant categories. Monitor category |
| 95 | ranking weekly — it drives discovery. |
| 96 | **Reviews:** Get 10+ reviews from mutual customers. Ask within 30 days of integration |
| 97 | activation. Respond to every review. |
| 98 | **Featured placement:** Negotiate featured/app-of-the-week placement with the |
| 99 | platform's partner team. Requires relationship building. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | ### Phase 5: Co-Selling |
| 102 | |
| 103 | **Account mapping:** Use Crossbeam/Reveal to identify shared accounts without |
| 104 | sharing customer lists directly. |
| 105 | **Co-selling play:** "We noticed you use [Partner]. Our integration with them |
| 106 | enables [specific value]. Want to see it?" |
| 107 | **Partner-sourced deals:** Formal deal registration so partners get credit |
| 108 | for referring deals they identified through account mapping. |
| 109 | **Joint QBRs:** Quarterly with top integration partners. Review shared pipeline, |
| 110 | plan joint campaigns, align on roadmap. |
| 111 | |
| 112 | ## Output Format |
| 113 | |
| 114 | Integration partnership plan with: partner prioritization matrix, MVI spec, |
| 115 | GTM launch checklist, marketplace optimization, and co-selling playbook. |
| 116 | |
| 117 | ## Quality Check |
| 118 | |
| 119 | Before delivering, verify: |
| 120 | |
| 121 | [ ] All required sections are complete |
| 122 | [ ] Output matches the user's stated need |
| 123 | [ ] Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations |
| 124 | [ ] No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action |
| 125 | [ ] Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ## Common Pitfalls |
| 128 | |
| 129 | **Skipping research.** Building output without understanding the specific context. Fix: always gather required inputs before producing deliverables. |
| 130 | **Generic output.** "Improve your process" without concrete steps. Fix: every recommendation must include a specific action, timeline, and owner. |
| 131 | **Missing framework citations.** Advice without named authorities. Fix: ground every recommendation in a cited framework from a recognized authority. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | ## Implementation Depth |
| 134 | |
| 135 | Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation. |
| 136 | |
| 137 | ### Diagnostic Questions |
| 138 | |
| 139 | What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led? |
| 140 | Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed? |
| 141 | What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none? |
| 142 | What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow? |
| 143 | What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure? |
| 144 | |
| 145 | ### Framework Application |
| 146 | |
| 147 | Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill: |
| 148 | |
| 149 | Technology Partnership Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 150 | Platform Ecosystem Strategy: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 151 | Crossbeam — Ecosystem-Led Growth: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 152 | |
| 153 | ### Deliverable Standard |
| 154 | |
| 155 | A strong output from this skill includes: |
| 156 | |
| 157 | A crisp diagnosis of the current situation |
| 158 | A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list |
| 159 | A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan |
| 160 | A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators |
| 161 | Risks and edge cases called out before execution |
| 162 | |
| 163 | ### Adaptation Rules |
| 164 | |
| 165 | For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity. |
| 166 | For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets. |
| 167 | For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements. |
| 168 | |
| 169 | ## Execution Artifacts |
| 170 | |
| 171 | `references/framework-notes.md` — Named frameworks and reference tables |
| 172 | `templates/output-template.md` — Deliverable shell for agent output |
| 173 | `scripts/check-output.py` — Lightweight deliverable validator |
| 174 | |
| 175 | ## Related Skills |
| 176 | |
| 177 | partnership-strategy, co-marketing, leadmagic-integrations, api-enrichment, sales-enablement |
| 178 |
Discussion
Alternatives
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Marketing.