Grand Slam Offer Creation Framework
Unverified●26/40Claude Code◐PartialHas SKILL.md but declares no allowed-tools — Claude Code will ask for permission each time
Cursor◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Cursor rules file
Codex◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no AGENTS.md
Gemini CLI◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in
Copilot◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Copilot instructions file
npx agentalley add hundred-million-offersWho is stuck, and on what
You know your product is good, but people keep saying they'll 'think about it' and then never come back. It feels like you're competing on price and always being talked down.
What it gives you
A complete written offer package — headline name, what's included, add-on bonuses with values, a money-back promise, a price, and a real reason to buy now.
When NOT to use it
It will not run your ads, build a website, or find customers for you — it only rebuilds the offer itself.
The whole source
Frontmatter — 4 properties
| name | hundred-million-offers |
|---|---|
| description | Create irresistible offers using the Value Equation, bonus stacking, risk-reversing guarantees, and ethical scarcity. Use when the user mentions "grand slam offer", "make my offer more compelling", "what bonuses should I add", "guarantee strategy", "offer naming", or "people say its too expensive". Also trigger when packaging a product for higher perceived value, justifying premium pricing instead of discounting, designing a money-back guarantee, or structuring tiers to maximize conversions. Covers the MAGIC naming formula and starving-crowd targeting. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For outbound sales, see predictable-revenue. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | author: wondelai version: "1.4.0 |
| 1 | --- |
| 2 | name: hundred-million-offers |
| 3 | description: 'Create irresistible offers using the Value Equation, bonus stacking, risk-reversing guarantees, and ethical scarcity. Use when the user mentions "grand slam offer", "make my offer more compelling", "what bonuses should I add", "guarantee strategy", "offer naming", or "people say its too expensive". Also trigger when packaging a product for higher perceived value, justifying premium pricing instead of discounting, designing a money-back guarantee, or structuring tiers to maximize conversions. Covers the MAGIC naming formula and starving-crowd targeting. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For outbound sales, see predictable-revenue.'B1 — Line is 666 characters — unreadable by eye |
| 4 | license: MIT |
| 5 | metadata: |
| 6 | author: wondelai |
| 7 | version: "1.4.0" |
| 8 | ---A5 — No allowed-tools declared — no way to tell what this skill may touch |
| 9 | |
| 10 | # Grand Slam Offer Creation Framework |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Framework for creating offers so good people feel stupid saying no. What you sell (the offer) matters more than how you sell it or who you sell it to. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | ## Core Principle |
| 15 | |
| 16 | **The offer is the #1 lever in any business: a Grand Slam Offer sells despite mediocre marketing, while the best marketing in the world cannot save a bad offer.** Before optimizing funnels, running more ads, or hiring salespeople, fix the offer. A Grand Slam Offer maximizes Dream Outcome and Perceived Likelihood of Achievement while minimizing Time Delay and Effort & Sacrifice — becoming a category of one with no comparable alternative. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## Scoring |
| 19 | |
| 20 | **Goal: 10/10.** Score any offer by the 7-row Quick Diagnostic at the end of this file — award ~1.4 points per row answered "yes," rounding to a 0-10 scale. Bands: **9-10** = all/nearly all rows pass (irresistible: 10x perceived value, reversed risk, ethical scarcity, named dollar-valued bonuses, a category-of-one bundle, a MAGIC name); **5-6** = value and market are right but risk, bonuses, or scarcity are missing; **<=3** = a commodity priced on cost with no guarantee or reason to act now. Always report the current score and the specific diagnostic rows that must flip to "yes" to reach 10/10.B1 — Line is 601 characters — unreadable by eye |
| 21 | |
| 22 | ## The Grand Slam Offer Framework |
| 23 | |
| 24 | ### 1. The Value Equation |
| 25 | |
| 26 | **Core concept:** Value = (Dream Outcome x Perceived Likelihood of Achievement) / (Time Delay x Effort & Sacrifice). Maximize the numerator and minimize the denominator to create massive perceived value. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | **Why it works:** People buy outcomes, not products — they weigh the dream result and their confidence in achieving it against how long and hard the path is. When the numerator vastly outweighs the denominator, the offer feels like a no-brainer regardless of price. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | **Key insights:** |
| 31 | - Dream Outcome defines the ceiling of your value |
| 32 | - Perceived Likelihood often matters more than actual results — social proof, guarantees, and track record raise it |
| 33 | - Time Delay is a silent killer; faster results command premium prices |
| 34 | - Effort & Sacrifice includes everything the customer gives up (time, comfort, status, identity) |
| 35 | - A guarantee raises Perceived Likelihood and lowers perceived risk simultaneously |
| 36 | |
| 37 | **Product applications:** |
| 38 | |
| 39 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 40 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 41 | | **SaaS** | Cut time-to-value | "First dashboard in 5 minutes, not 5 weeks" | |
| 42 | | **Agency** | Guarantee results to cut risk | "10 qualified leads or you don't pay" | |
| 43 | | **Info product** | Templates reduce effort | "Fill in the blanks -- no writing from scratch" | |
| 44 | |
| 45 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 46 | - "Get [Dream Outcome] in [short time] without [Effort & Sacrifice]" |
| 47 | - "Guaranteed [result] or [risk reversal]" |
| 48 | - "We do [hard part] so you don't have to" |
| 49 | |
| 50 | **Ethical boundary:** Back every speed, effort, and results claim with data, or label it aspirational rather than asserting it. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | See [references/value-equation.md](references/value-equation.md) when scoring an offer's value: per-lever 1-10 rubric, a composite-score calculator, and lever-interaction effects. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | ### 2. The Grand Slam Offer |
| 55 | |
| 56 | **Core concept:** A Grand Slam Offer is a complete package — core offer, bonuses, guarantee, scarcity, urgency, and a compelling name — not just a product. |
| 57 | |
| 58 | **Why it works:** Bundling multiple value elements makes price comparison impossible: no competitor offers the same combination, so you escape commoditization and price pressure. |
| 59 | |
| 60 | **Key insights:** |
| 61 | - List every problem and obstacle between the customer and the Dream Outcome; create a solution and delivery vehicle for each |
| 62 | - Trim & Stack: cut low-value/high-cost solutions, stack high-value/low-cost ones |
| 63 | - Each component should be nameable, independently valuable, and dollar-valued |
| 64 | - The sum of component values should be at least 10x the price |
| 65 | |
| 66 | **Product applications:** |
| 67 | |
| 68 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 69 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 70 | | **SaaS** | Bundle training, setup, templates | "Platform + Setup Concierge + Template Library + Weekly Coaching" | |
| 71 | | **Course** | Add community, coaching, tools | "Course + Private Community + Weekly Q&A + Swipe Files" | |
| 72 | | **Consulting** | Package frameworks and support | "Diagnostic + Roadmap + 90-Day Implementation Support" | |
| 73 | |
| 74 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 75 | - "Here's everything you get when you join today..." |
| 76 | - "Total value: $[sum of components]. Your investment: $[price]." |
| 77 | - "Everything you need to [Dream Outcome] in one package" |
| 78 | |
| 79 | **Ethical boundary:** Price each component at what someone would actually pay for it standalone — never inflate values to fake the value-price gap. |
| 80 | |
| 81 | See [references/grand-slam-offers.md](references/grand-slam-offers.md) when assembling the full package: problem-solution mapping and the Trim & Stack method worked end to end. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | ### 3. Finding Your Starving Crowd |
| 84 | |
| 85 | **Core concept:** Before building the offer, find a starving crowd — a market with massive pain, purchasing power, easy targeting, and growth. The best offer fails if aimed at the wrong market. |
| 86 | |
| 87 | **Why it works:** A starving crowd already knows it has the problem and is already hunting for a solution — your only job is presenting a compelling offer, which slashes acquisition cost and lifts conversion. |
| 88 | |
| 89 | **Key insights:** |
| 90 | - Four criteria: massive pain, purchasing power, easy to target, growing market |
| 91 | - Pain matters most — people pay to stop pain faster than to gain pleasure |
| 92 | - "Easy to target" means reachable through existing channels (associations, communities, platforms) |
| 93 | - Niching down raises perceived value because specificity signals expertise |
| 94 | |
| 95 | **Product applications:** |
| 96 | |
| 97 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 98 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 99 | | **SaaS** | Vertical with acute pain | "CRM for real estate agents who lose deals to follow-up failures" | |
| 100 | | **Agency** | Dominate one industry | "SEO agency exclusively for dental practices" | |
| 101 | | **Info product** | Narrow, painful, urgent problem | "How doctors negotiate their first hospital contract" | |
| 102 | |
| 103 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 104 | - "Made specifically for [narrow audience] who struggle with [specific pain]" |
| 105 | - "We only work with [type of client] because we know your world" |
| 106 | - "If you're a [avatar] dealing with [pain], this was built for you" |
| 107 | |
| 108 | **Ethical boundary:** Target genuine need and fit, never vulnerability — avoid people in crisis who cannot make rational decisions. |
| 109 | |
| 110 | See [references/starving-crowd.md](references/starving-crowd.md) when choosing or validating a market: the four-criteria niche scorecard and demand-validation checks. |
| 111 | |
| 112 | ### 4. Value-Based Pricing |
| 113 | |
| 114 | **Core concept:** Charge based on the value you deliver, not your costs — aim for a 10:1 value-to-price ratio. |
| 115 | |
| 116 | **Why it works:** Low prices attract price-sensitive customers who churn fastest and refer least; premium prices attract committed customers who invest effort, get better results, and stay — while funding exceptional delivery. That's a virtuous cycle. |
| 117 | |
| 118 | **Key insights:** |
| 119 | - Price is a function of perceived value, not cost |
| 120 | - Raising prices often increases conversions — price signals quality and seriousness |
| 121 | - Anchor against the cost of not solving the problem, not against alternatives |
| 122 | - Payment plans remove price as an objection without reducing revenue |
| 123 | - Price communicates positioning: commodity, premium, or luxury |
| 124 | |
| 125 | **Product applications:** |
| 126 | |
| 127 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 128 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 129 | | **SaaS** | Price on outcomes, not features | "$500/mo for pipeline management that closes 3x more deals" | |
| 130 | | **Coaching** | Price against the transformation | "$25,000 program that helps consultants add $200K/year" | |
| 131 | | **Info product** | Price against the alternative | "$2,000 course vs. 3 years of trial-and-error and $50K in mistakes" | |
| 132 | |
| 133 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 134 | - "What would it be worth to you if [Dream Outcome]?" |
| 135 | - "The cost of doing nothing is $[opportunity cost] per [time period]" |
| 136 | - "An investment of $[price] for $[10x value] in [outcome]" |
| 137 | |
| 138 | See [references/pricing-strategy.md](references/pricing-strategy.md) when setting a price: value-based pricing frameworks, cost-of-inaction anchoring, and payment-plan structures. |
| 139 | |
| 140 | ### 5. Bonuses: Value Stacking |
| 141 | |
| 142 | **Core concept:** Bonuses are added components that address remaining objections and make the offer feel like an overwhelming deal — each solving a specific problem with an independently justifiable dollar value. |
| 143 | |
| 144 | **Why it works:** Each bonus is attached to a specific unspoken objection, so the prospect's reasons not to buy are answered before they surface — and once stacked value exceeds the price, the core product reads as "free." |
| 145 | |
| 146 | **Key insights:** |
| 147 | - Each bonus should kill a specific objection or obstacle to success |
| 148 | - Stack order matters: present the most valuable bonus first as the anchor |
| 149 | - Partner bonuses add value at zero cost to you |
| 150 | - Name each bonus — named bonuses feel more real; keep them high value / low cost to deliver (templates, recordings, access) |
| 151 | |
| 152 | **Product applications:** |
| 153 | |
| 154 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 155 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 156 | | **SaaS** | Training, templates, priority support | "Bonus: 50 proven email templates ($500 value)" | |
| 157 | | **Coaching** | Tools, assessments, community | "Bonus: Private Slack community for accountability ($2,000/yr value)" | |
| 158 | | **Agency** | Strategy docs, competitive analysis | "Bonus: Full competitive SEO audit ($3,000 value)" | |
| 159 | |
| 160 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 161 | - "Bonus #1: [Name] (a $[value] value) -- FREE" |
| 162 | - "We added this because we noticed [objection] was holding people back" |
| 163 | - "Total bonus value: $[sum]. Yours free when you join today." |
| 164 | |
| 165 | See [references/bonuses-stacking.md](references/bonuses-stacking.md) when designing bonuses: objection-to-bonus mapping, dollar-value assignment, and stack-order strategy. |
| 166 | |
| 167 | ### 6. Guarantees: Reversing Risk |
| 168 | |
| 169 | **Core concept:** Guarantees transfer risk from buyer to seller. The prospect's biggest fear isn't losing money — it's making a bad decision; a strong guarantee makes "yes" psychologically safe. |
| 170 | |
| 171 | **Why it works:** Every purchase carries financial, time, reputation, and identity risk, and guarantees neutralize them. Counterintuitively, stronger guarantees reduce refund rates — they signal confidence and attract committed buyers. |
| 172 | |
| 173 | **Key insights:** |
| 174 | - Five types: unconditional, conditional, anti-guarantee, implied, performance-based |
| 175 | - Unconditional (full refund, no questions) is simplest and strongest for low-ticket |
| 176 | - Conditional ("do X steps, or we refund") attracts better clients; anti-guarantees ("all sales final") work when demand exceeds supply |
| 177 | - Performance-based ("we hit [metric] or you don't pay") is the ultimate risk reversal |
| 178 | - Name your guarantee, and stack multiple guarantees to reverse multiple risk types |
| 179 | |
| 180 | **Product applications:** |
| 181 | |
| 182 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 183 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 184 | | **SaaS** | Trial + money-back | "Try free for 30 days, then 60-day money-back guarantee" | |
| 185 | | **Coaching** | Conditional + performance-based | "Complete all 12 modules; no 3 new clients = 100% refund" | |
| 186 | | **Agency** | Performance-based | "50 qualified leads in 90 days or we work free until you get them" | |
| 187 | |
| 188 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 189 | - "Our [Named] Guarantee: [specific promise] or [consequence]" |
| 190 | - "Try it for [time period]. If you're not [specific outcome], we'll [reversal]." |
| 191 | - "You literally cannot lose." |
| 192 | |
| 193 | **Ethical boundary:** Make the guarantee frictionless to claim — no fine-print traps or hoops; a guarantee that's hard to invoke destroys trust permanently. |
| 194 | |
| 195 | See [references/guarantees.md](references/guarantees.md) when choosing or wording a guarantee: the five types compared, naming strategies, and how to stack them. |
| 196 | |
| 197 | ### 7. Scarcity and Urgency |
| 198 | |
| 199 | **Core concept:** Scarcity limits quantity (how many); urgency limits time (how long). Both give people who already want the offer a reason to act now. |
| 200 | |
| 201 | **Why it works:** Loss aversion makes a looming "you'll miss out" outweigh the inertia of "I'll think about it" — and "I'll think about it" functionally means no. |
| 202 | |
| 203 | **Key insights:** |
| 204 | - Scarcity of supply: limited seats, enrollment caps, production runs; urgency of time: enrollment windows, deadline-driven bonuses |
| 205 | - Cohort-based models are the most ethical scarcity (genuinely limited capacity) |
| 206 | - Bonus scarcity ("First 20 people also get...") adds urgency without limiting the core offer |
| 207 | - Evergreen urgency must tie to real events (onboarding cohorts, seasonal cycles) |
| 208 | |
| 209 | **Product applications:** |
| 210 | |
| 211 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 212 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 213 | | **SaaS** | Limited beta, grandfathered pricing | "Founding member pricing: locked for life, only 100 spots" | |
| 214 | | **Coaching** | Cohort enrollment windows | "Next cohort starts March 1. Only 20 seats." | |
| 215 | | **Agency** | Client capacity limits | "We take 5 new clients per quarter to ensure quality" | |
| 216 | |
| 217 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 218 | - "Only [X] spots remaining in this cohort" |
| 219 | - "Enrollment closes [specific date] at midnight" |
| 220 | - "First [X] people to join also receive [bonus]" |
| 221 | |
| 222 | **Ethical boundary:** Every scarcity and urgency claim must be 100% true — if you say 20 spots, there are 20 spots. Never reset a countdown timer or fake a sold-out; it is the fastest way to destroy a brand. |
| 223 | |
| 224 | See [references/scarcity-urgency.md](references/scarcity-urgency.md) when adding a reason to act now: ethical scarcity patterns, cohort models, and evergreen urgency tied to real events. |
| 225 | |
| 226 | ### 8. Naming the Offer |
| 227 | |
| 228 | **Core concept:** The name is the first thing prospects see and the last thing they remember. A great name communicates audience, outcome, timeframe, and format in a few words. |
| 229 | |
| 230 | **Why it works:** A well-named offer pre-qualifies the right audience, sets expectations, and creates curiosity — a poorly named one requires explanation, which means you've already lost attention. |
| 231 | |
| 232 | **Key insights — the MAGIC formula:** |
| 233 | - **M** = Magnetic reason why (hook, event, season, trend) |
| 234 | - **A** = Avatar (who it's for — the more specific, the better) |
| 235 | - **G** = Goal (the Dream Outcome in concrete terms) |
| 236 | - **I** = Indicate a time frame (how fast) |
| 237 | - **C** = Container word (challenge, blueprint, accelerator, bootcamp, system, formula, masterclass) |
| 238 | - Use only the elements that serve clarity; test 3-5 names — a name change alone can double conversion |
| 239 | |
| 240 | **Product applications:** |
| 241 | |
| 242 | | Context | Application | Example | |
| 243 | |---------|-------------|---------| |
| 244 | | **SaaS** | Outcome + speed | "Pipeline Accelerator: Close 3x More Deals in 90 Days" | |
| 245 | | **Coaching** | Avatar + goal + timeframe | "The 6-Figure Freelancer Blueprint: From $5K to $15K Months in 120 Days" | |
| 246 | | **Agency** | Lead with the guarantee | "The 50-Lead Guarantee: Qualified Appointments in 60 Days" | |
| 247 | |
| 248 | **Copy patterns:** |
| 249 | - "The [Time Frame] [Avatar] [Goal] [Container]" |
| 250 | - "[Goal] [Container] for [Avatar]" |
| 251 | - "[Number]-Day [Goal] [Container] for [Avatar]" |
| 252 | |
| 253 | **Ethical boundary:** The name may be aspirational but never deceptive — don't promise an outcome in the name (e.g. "6-Figure Blueprint") that customers don't actually reach. |
| 254 | |
| 255 | See [references/naming-offers.md](references/naming-offers.md) when naming or A/B-testing a name: the MAGIC breakdown, container-word tables, 20+ worked examples, and test methods. |
| 256 | |
| 257 | ## Offer Creation Process |
| 258 | |
| 259 | To build a Grand Slam Offer from scratch, run the eight sections above in this order: |
| 260 | |
| 261 | 1. **Identify your starving crowd** (§3) — score markets on pain, purchasing power, targetability, growth. |
| 262 | 2. **Define the Dream Outcome** (§1) — the single most desirable result, in the customer's words. |
| 263 | 3. **List every obstacle** — every problem, fear, objection, and friction point on the way. |
| 264 | 4. **Create solutions for each obstacle** — with a delivery vehicle (1-on-1, group, DIY, done-for-you, software, physical). |
| 265 | 5. **Apply Trim & Stack** (§2) — cut low-value/high-cost solutions; keep high-value/low-cost ones. |
| 266 | 6. **Set value-based pricing** (§4) — price at 10-20% of the Dream Outcome's value (10:1 to 5:1). |
| 267 | 7. **Design your bonuses** (§5) — one per remaining objection, each named with a defensible dollar value. |
| 268 | 8. **Choose your guarantee** (§6) — pick the type that fits your model and risk tolerance; name it; make it bold. |
| 269 | 9. **Add ethical scarcity and urgency** (§7) — real limits (seats, cohorts) and real deadlines. |
| 270 | 10. **Name the offer using MAGIC** (§8) — combine avatar, goal, timeframe, container; test 3-5 variations. |
| 271 | |
| 272 | See [references/offer-creation-checklist.md](references/offer-creation-checklist.md) to run this process as a fill-in worksheet (per-step prompts, scoring rubric, assembly template), and [references/case-studies.md](references/case-studies.md) for six full before/after offer redesigns (SaaS, coaching, e-commerce, agency, local, info product). |
| 273 | |
| 274 | ## Common Mistakes |
| 275 | |
| 276 | | Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix | |
| 277 | |---------|-------------|-----| |
| 278 | | **Selling a commodity** | Commodities compete on price; you lose | Bundle unique value to become a category of one | |
| 279 | | **Pricing based on cost** | Leaves value on the table, signals low quality | Price on Dream Outcome value (10:1 rule) | |
| 280 | | **No guarantee** | Prospect bears all the risk and hesitates | Reverse risk — stronger guarantees reduce refunds | |
| 281 | | **Vague bonuses** | "Access to community" means nothing | Name each bonus, describe value, assign a dollar amount | |
| 282 | | **Fake scarcity** | Destroys trust when caught | Only 100% real, verifiable scarcity | |
| 283 | | **Generic naming** | "Business Growth Program" could be anything | Apply the MAGIC formula | |
| 284 | | **Targeting everyone** | "For anyone" attracts no one | Narrow the avatar until uncomfortable, then go narrower | |
| 285 | |
| 286 | ## Quick Diagnostic |
| 287 | |
| 288 | Use this table to audit any existing offer: |
| 289 | |
| 290 | | Question | If No | Action | |
| 291 | |----------|-------|--------| |
| 292 | | Does the offer deliver 10x the price in perceived value? | Feels overpriced | Add bonuses or raise the Dream Outcome | |
| 293 | | Is the market a starving crowd (pain + money + targetable + growing)? | Hard to sell regardless | Switch markets or narrow further | |
| 294 | | Does the guarantee reverse the prospect's risk? | Fear blocks the sale | Add a guarantee that makes yes feel safe | |
| 295 | | Are there at least 3 named bonuses with dollar values? | Offer feels thin | Create objection-killing bonuses | |
| 296 | | Is there a real reason to act now? | "I'll think about it" | Add ethical scarcity/urgency with a real deadline | |
| 297 | | Could a competitor offer the exact same thing? | Commodity; price war | Bundle elements that defy comparison | |
| 298 | | Does the name say who it's for and what they get? | No self-selection | Rename using MAGIC | |
| 299 | |
| 300 | ## Further Reading |
| 301 | |
| 302 | Based on Alex Hormozi's offer creation framework: |
| 303 | |
| 304 | - [*"$100M Offers: How to Make Offers So Good People Feel Stupid Saying No"*](https://www.amazon.com/100M-Offers-People-Stupid-Saying/dp/1737475731?tag=wondelai00-20) by Alex Hormozi |
| 305 | - [*"$100M Leads: How to Get Strangers to Want to Buy Your Stuff"*](https://www.amazon.com/100M-Leads-Strangers-Want-Stuff/dp/1737475774?tag=wondelai00-20) by Alex Hormozi |
| 306 | |
| 307 | ## About the Author |
| 308 | |
| 309 | **Alex Hormozi** is an entrepreneur, investor, and founder of Acquisition.com, a portfolio of companies generating over $200 million per year. *$100M Offers*, his actionable playbook for creating irresistible offers, has become one of the most widely recommended business books among entrepreneurs and marketers. |
| 310 |
Reviews
Installed this one?Write the first review and take the Trailblazer badge.
Alternatives
Structure Your Invention For A Patent FilingDescribe your invention in plain words and get back a formal write-up that lays out the problem it solves, how it works, and which parts are worth protecting.●····●37/40Claims Drafting: The Core Patent SkillDescribe your invention in plain words and get back a numbered set of formal patent claims — the legal wording that defines exactly what you own.●····●36/40Patent Novelty and Non-Obviousness CheckDescribe your invention in everyday words and get back a clear read on whether it's new and original enough to patent, plus where it might hit trouble.●····●35/40Patent Pipeline: From Invention to FilingDescribe your invention in plain words and get back a complete first-draft patent application — claims, full description, and abstract — ready to hand to a patent attorney.●····●35/40