Hand in the big decision keeping you stuck; get back

Design Sprint Framework

by wondelai · MIT license · ★ 2,235 on GitHub · updated Sep 10

Design Sprint Framework cover

Hand in the big decision keeping you stuck; get back a day-by-day plan for one focused week that ends with real answers from five customers.

---
name: design-sprint
description: 'Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product decision, or wants to de-risk a costly idea before investing in development. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday. For ongoing experimentation and MVPs, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For non-leading user interviews, see mom-test.'
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: wondelai
  version: "1.4.0"
---

# Design Sprint Framework

A five-day process for answering critical business questions through design, prototyping, and testing ideas with customers. Developed at Google Ventures and used by Google, Slack, Airbnb, and hundreds of startups.

## Core Principle

**Compress months of debate, design, and testing into one week — and test with real users before writing any production code.** The sprint replaces endless discussion with a fixed Monday-to-Friday spine, hard time-boxes, and a single Decider, so a high-stakes product question gets a real answer in five days instead of five months.

## Scoring

Overview

A five-day process for answering critical business questions through design, prototyping, and testing ideas with customers. Developed at Google Ventures and used by Google, Slack, Airbnb, and hundreds of startups.

The SKILL.md below is the copy AgentAlley read and checked. The repo has changed it since; the other files are from commit c172996.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add wondelai/skills --skill design-sprint -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/wondelai/skills/tar.gz/c172996495be \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=1 skills-c172996495be/design-sprint
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/2fc88c0886f37cb20693/design-sprint.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\design-sprint.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\design-sprint.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md15.0 KB
  • references/9 files · 123.3 KB
Read the files here
wondelai/c17299610 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text240 lines

Design Sprint Framework

A five-day process for answering critical business questions through design, prototyping, and testing ideas with customers. Developed at Google Ventures and used by Google, Slack, Airbnb, and hundreds of startups.

Core Principle

Compress months of debate, design, and testing into one week — and test with real users before writing any production code. The sprint replaces endless discussion with a fixed Monday-to-Friday spine, hard time-boxes, and a single Decider, so a high-stakes product question gets a real answer in five days instead of five months.

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. Score a sprint plan or execution by awarding 1 point for each item present and correct (10 total). Report the score and the missing items needed to reach 10/10.

  1. Decider committed for the full week; one Sprint Master facilitating.
  2. Monday produces a target customer and moment (not a vague "test the product").
  3. Hard time-boxes used (Crazy 8s in 8 min, 10am-5pm days, no open-ended sessions).
  4. Solution sketches done alone and anonymous — no group brainstorming.
  5. Wednesday ends with a single Decider Supervote, not consensus.
  6. Storyboard specified before any prototype is built.
  7. Prototype is a Goldilocks-fidelity facade, testable in 5-15 min, with a trial run done.
  8. Exactly 5 target users recruited via screener (6 scheduled to absorb a no-show).
  9. Friday uses the Five-Act Interview; users interpret the prototype unexplained.
  10. End-of-sprint debrief converts the +/-/~ pattern grid into a decision on next steps.

A plan missing the Decider, real users, or a same-day prototype caps at 6 — those are the failure modes the sprint exists to prevent.

The 5-Day Sprint Process

Monday → Tuesday → Wednesday → Thursday → Friday
  Map      Sketch     Decide      Prototype    Test

Prerequisites: a big challenge worth a week's focus; the right team (Decider plus 4-7 people with diverse expertise); five full days (10am-5pm) with no interruptions; a dedicated room with whiteboards. One Sprint Master facilitates, keeps time, and manages energy.

See references/facilitation.md when you are the Sprint Master — it has the full facilitation guide, time-boxing tactics, and energy-management moves for keeping a stuck or low-energy room productive.

Monday: Map

Goal: Understand the problem and choose a target for the week.

Morning: Start at the End
  • Long-term goal: Write the optimistic answer to "What do we want to be true in 2 years?" — e.g., "Customers use our product daily."
  • Sprint questions: List obstacles and unknowns as questions on the whiteboard, whole team contributing — e.g., "Will customers trust us with payment info?"
Afternoon: Map the Challenge
  • Customer journey map: List the actors (customer types), then draw the journey left to right in 5-15 steps: "Hears about product → Visits site → Signs up → First use → Regular user."
  • Ask the Experts: Interview teammates with specialized knowledge (CEO, design, engineering, support, sales); capture notes on the whiteboard.
  • How Might We (HMW): Rephrase problems as opportunities — "Customers don't understand pricing" → "HMW make pricing immediately clear?" One per sticky note; vote and organize the best on the map.
End of Day: Pick a Target

Choose which customer and moment on the map to focus on — the biggest risk or opportunity (e.g., "the first 10 minutes after signup"). The Decider (person with authority) makes the final call.

Monday output: long-term goal, sprint questions, journey map, expert insights, organized HMW notes, target customer and moment.

See references/monday.md while facilitating Monday — step-by-step exercise scripts, HMW examples, and the target-selection method.

Tuesday: Sketch

Goal: Generate solutions — each person sketches a detailed solution.

Morning: Lightning Demos
  • Find inspiration: 3-minute demos of competitors and analogous products ("Here's what I found, here's why it's interesting"); capture good ideas on the whiteboard. Borrow from any industry.
  • Divide or swarm: Split the map between people if it has multiple parts; otherwise everyone tackles the same critical problem (most sprints swarm).
Afternoon: The Four-Step Sketch

Everyone sketches alone — no group brainstorming. Individual work produces better, more diverse ideas.

  1. Notes (20 min): Silently walk the room reviewing the map, HMWs, and inspiration.
  2. Ideas (20 min): Rough doodles, mind maps, stick figures — quantity over quality.
  3. Crazy 8s (8 min): Fold paper into 8 panels and sketch 8 variations in 8 minutes — forces you past your first idea.
  4. Solution Sketch (30-90 min): A 3-panel storyboard of the customer experience (beginning, middle, end). Make it self-explanatory, give it a catchy title, and keep it anonymous.

Tuesday output: one detailed, anonymous, self-explanatory solution sketch per person.

See references/tuesday.md before the Four-Step Sketch — Crazy 8s and solution-sketch templates plus worked examples to show the team.

Wednesday: Decide

Goal: Critique solutions and choose the best one to prototype and test.

Morning: Sticky Decision
  • Art museum: Tape sketches to the wall; review silently (no talking) and mark interesting parts with dot stickers.
  • Heat map review: Discuss each sketch for 3 minutes — the facilitator narrates while the anonymous sketcher stays silent; a scribe captures standout ideas on the whiteboard.
  • Straw poll: Each person votes for one solution with one sentence of rationale (non-binding).
  • Supervote: The Decider gets three large dots; their decision wins.
Afternoon: Rumble or All-in-One

If multiple sketches win, choose: Rumble (competing prototypes testing different approaches) or All-in-One (combine the best ideas into one prototype — simpler, and what most sprints do).

  • Storyboard: Draw a 10-15 panel comic of the test experience: opening scene (how the customer discovers you) → your solution in action → successful outcome. Keep it simple — stick figures, words, arrows — but get specific about the UI. Include just enough detail for Thursday's prototype.

Wednesday output: winning solution(s) and a detailed storyboard ready to prototype.

See references/wednesday.md when running the Sticky Decision and storyboard — facilitation steps for the vote and a panel-by-panel storyboard template.

Thursday: Prototype

Goal: Build a realistic facade in one day — you need something to test on Friday.

Mindset: Fake it; prototype only what you'll test. Aim for Goldilocks fidelity — sketches are too low for honest reactions, working code wastes time. It should look real without working for real (facades, click-throughs, video).

Assign Roles
Role Responsibility
Makers (2+) Build the prototype pieces (design, assets)
Stitcher (1) Combines pieces into the final prototype (Keynote, Figma)
Writer (1) All copy: headlines, button labels, descriptions
Collector (1-2) Gathers photos, icons, competitor screenshots
Interviewer (1) Writes and rehearses Friday's interview script
Sprint Master Helps where needed, keeps energy up
Build the Prototype

Tools: Figma, Keynote, or PowerPoint linked slides for web/apps; video walkthrough or 3D-printed mockup for physical products; role-play video or scripted interaction for services.

Morning: divide the storyboard into scenes and assign them to makers. Afternoon: stitch together, review against the storyboard, rehearse the full flow, and run a trial with someone outside the sprint team.

Prototype checklist:

  • Follows storyboard exactly
  • Looks real enough to get honest reactions
  • Can walk through in 5-15 minutes
  • Interviewer knows how to present it
  • Trial run completed

Thursday output: realistic prototype, interview script, prepared interview room.

See references/thursday.md while building the prototype — tool-by-tool techniques (Keynote/Figma facades, video, mockups) for hitting Goldilocks fidelity in a day.

Friday: Test

Goal: Interview 5 customers; learn what works and what doesn't.

Setup

Interview room: quiet space, laptop with the prototype, camera recording screen and customer's face. Observation room: live video feed where the whole team watches and takes notes on a whiteboard. One Interviewer conducts all five interviews.

The Five-Act Interview

About 45 minutes per customer (the five acts run ~35 min plus setup and transitions), with 30-minute breaks between to discuss observations and adjust questions. See references/friday.md for the full 9am-5pm schedule.

Act Time What to Do
1. Friendly welcome 5 min Greet warmly; explain you're testing the prototype, not them; get recording permission; encourage thinking aloud
2. Context questions 5 min "Tell me about how you currently handle [problem]" — understand mindset and current behavior
3. Introduce prototype 5 min "What's this? What do you think it's for?" Don't explain — let them interpret
4. Tasks and nudges 15 min Open-ended exploration, then storyboard tasks. When stuck: "What would you do next?", "What's going through your mind?" Don't help — watch them struggle
5. Debrief 5 min "What did you think overall?", "Who is this for?", "What worked? What was confusing?"
Five Is the Magic Number

Patterns emerge after 3-5 people and returns diminish after 5 — and five interview-plus-break slots fit one day (see references/friday.md). Recruit target customers via a screener survey and offer an incentive ($100-$200 B2B, $50-$100 B2C).

See references/recruiting.md two weeks before the sprint — it has screener-survey questions, recruiting channels, scheduling logistics, and incentive guidance for locking in five on-target users.

Take Notes: Pattern Recognition

Capture observations in a grid, one column per customer:

Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3 Customer 4 Customer 5
notes notes notes notes notes

Mark each observation ✓ (positive, success), ✗ (negative, failure), or ~ (neutral/mixed). After all five interviews, count marks per row and look for patterns — did all 5 struggle with the same thing?

End-of-Sprint Debrief

Organize findings: ✓ what worked (flows everyone understood, messaging that resonated), ✗ what failed (confusing terminology, missing steps, wrong assumptions), ~ mixed (some got it, some didn't). Then decide next steps:

  • Core concept validated: build it, or run the next sprint on details
  • Major issues: pivot, or sprint again on the problems
  • Total failure: back to the drawing board — you just saved months

Friday output: interview recordings, pattern notes, a clear list of what works and what doesn't, decision on next steps.

See references/friday.md before interviewing — verbatim Five-Act scripts, note-taking templates, the fuller next-steps decision table, and the common Friday mistakes to avoid.

When to Run a Design Sprint

Run when: the decision is high-stakes, there's no time to build and test normally, the team is stuck in endless debate, multiple solutions compete, it's a new product/feature/major redesign, or you need to de-risk before investing.

Don't run when: the problem and solution are obvious and you just need to execute, the team isn't bought in, or you can't get the Decider for the full week.

See references/case-studies.md for worked sprint walk-throughs (Slack, Blue Bottle Coffee, Savioke and more) when you need a concrete precedent for how a sprint played out in a domain like yours.

Variations

  • 4-Day Sprint: Day 1 Map + Sketch (compressed), Day 2 Decide, Day 3 Prototype, Day 4 Test.
  • Remote Sprint: Same schedule with Miro/FigJam whiteboards and Zoom. See references/remote-sprints.md when the team is distributed — it adapts each exercise to digital whiteboards, sets remote time-boxes, and handles video-based prototype testing.
  • Multi-Sprint: Sprint 1 chooses direction on a broad problem, Sprint 2 deep-dives the chosen solution, Sprint 3 refines details.

Common Mistakes

Mistake Why It Fails Fix
Skip prototyping Nothing to test Always prototype, even if simple
Over-engineer prototype Waste time on details that don't matter Facade only, not working code
Test with wrong users Invalid feedback Screen for target customers
Explain prototype to users Defeats the test; confusion is the data Run Acts 3-4 as written — they interpret and struggle unaided
No decision maker Can't commit to decision Get Decider for full week or don't sprint
Interruptions Breaks focus Protect the week, no meetings/emails

Quick Diagnostic

Audit any sprint plan:

Question If No Action
Do we have a Decider for full week? Sprint will fail Get commitment or postpone
Is the problem important enough? Waste of time Only sprint on big challenges
Can we prototype in 1 day? Wrong problem for sprint Choose more concrete problem
Can we recruit 5 target users? Can't test properly Start recruiting now (2 weeks ahead)
Will team commit to no interruptions? Won't maintain focus Get buy-in from leadership

Further Reading

For the complete methodology, exercises, and case studies:

  • "Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days" by Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, Braden Kowitz

About the Author

Jake Knapp created the Design Sprint at Google, where he ran sprints on Gmail, Chrome, and Google X, then refined the process across 100+ startup sprints as a design partner at Google Ventures. The sprint is now used at Google, Slack, Airbnb, LEGO, and thousands of companies worldwide. He is also the author of Make Time.

1---
2name: design-sprint
3description: 'Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product decision, or wants to de-risk a costly idea before investing in development. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday. For ongoing experimentation and MVPs, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For non-leading user interviews, see mom-test.'
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 author: wondelai
7 version: "1.4.0"
8---
9 
10# Design Sprint Framework
11 
12A five-day process for answering critical business questions through design, prototyping, and testing ideas with customers. Developed at Google Ventures and used by Google, Slack, Airbnb, and hundreds of startups.
13 
14## Core Principle
15 
16**Compress months of debate, design, and testing into one week — and test with real users before writing any production code.** The sprint replaces endless discussion with a fixed Monday-to-Friday spine, hard time-boxes, and a single Decider, so a high-stakes product question gets a real answer in five days instead of five months.
17 
18## Scoring
19 
20**Goal: 10/10.** Score a sprint plan or execution by awarding 1 point for each item present and correct (10 total). Report the score and the missing items needed to reach 10/10.
21 
221. Decider committed for the full week; one Sprint Master facilitating.
232. Monday produces a target customer and moment (not a vague "test the product").
243. Hard time-boxes used (Crazy 8s in 8 min, 10am-5pm days, no open-ended sessions).
254. Solution sketches done alone and anonymous — no group brainstorming.
265. Wednesday ends with a single Decider Supervote, not consensus.
276. Storyboard specified before any prototype is built.
287. Prototype is a Goldilocks-fidelity facade, testable in 5-15 min, with a trial run done.
298. Exactly 5 target users recruited via screener (6 scheduled to absorb a no-show).
309. Friday uses the Five-Act Interview; users interpret the prototype unexplained.
3110. End-of-sprint debrief converts the +/-/~ pattern grid into a decision on next steps.
32 
33A plan missing the Decider, real users, or a same-day prototype caps at 6 — those are the failure modes the sprint exists to prevent.
34 
35## The 5-Day Sprint Process
36 
37```
38Monday → Tuesday → Wednesday → Thursday → Friday
39 Map Sketch Decide Prototype Test
40```
41 
42**Prerequisites:** a big challenge worth a week's focus; the right team (Decider plus 4-7 people with diverse expertise); five full days (10am-5pm) with no interruptions; a dedicated room with whiteboards. One **Sprint Master** facilitates, keeps time, and manages energy.
43 
44See [references/facilitation.md](references/facilitation.md) when you are the Sprint Master — it has the full facilitation guide, time-boxing tactics, and energy-management moves for keeping a stuck or low-energy room productive.
45 
46## Monday: Map
47 
48**Goal:** Understand the problem and choose a target for the week.
49 
50### Morning: Start at the End
51 
52- **Long-term goal:** Write the optimistic answer to "What do we want to be true in 2 years?" — e.g., "Customers use our product daily."
53- **Sprint questions:** List obstacles and unknowns as questions on the whiteboard, whole team contributing — e.g., "Will customers trust us with payment info?"
54 
55### Afternoon: Map the Challenge
56 
57- **Customer journey map:** List the actors (customer types), then draw the journey left to right in 5-15 steps: "Hears about product → Visits site → Signs up → First use → Regular user."
58- **Ask the Experts:** Interview teammates with specialized knowledge (CEO, design, engineering, support, sales); capture notes on the whiteboard.
59- **How Might We (HMW):** Rephrase problems as opportunities — "Customers don't understand pricing" → "HMW make pricing immediately clear?" One per sticky note; vote and organize the best on the map.
60 
61### End of Day: Pick a Target
62 
63Choose which customer and moment on the map to focus on — the biggest risk or opportunity (e.g., "the first 10 minutes after signup"). The **Decider** (person with authority) makes the final call.
64 
65**Monday output:** long-term goal, sprint questions, journey map, expert insights, organized HMW notes, target customer and moment.
66 
67See [references/monday.md](references/monday.md) while facilitating Monday — step-by-step exercise scripts, HMW examples, and the target-selection method.
68 
69## Tuesday: Sketch
70 
71**Goal:** Generate solutions — each person sketches a detailed solution.
72 
73### Morning: Lightning Demos
74 
75- **Find inspiration:** 3-minute demos of competitors and analogous products ("Here's what I found, here's why it's interesting"); capture good ideas on the whiteboard. Borrow from any industry.
76- **Divide or swarm:** Split the map between people if it has multiple parts; otherwise everyone tackles the same critical problem (most sprints swarm).
77 
78### Afternoon: The Four-Step Sketch
79 
80Everyone sketches alone — **no group brainstorming**. Individual work produces better, more diverse ideas.
81 
821. **Notes (20 min):** Silently walk the room reviewing the map, HMWs, and inspiration.
832. **Ideas (20 min):** Rough doodles, mind maps, stick figures — quantity over quality.
843. **Crazy 8s (8 min):** Fold paper into 8 panels and sketch 8 variations in 8 minutes — forces you past your first idea.
854. **Solution Sketch (30-90 min):** A 3-panel storyboard of the customer experience (beginning, middle, end). Make it self-explanatory, give it a catchy title, and keep it **anonymous**.
86 
87**Tuesday output:** one detailed, anonymous, self-explanatory solution sketch per person.
88 
89See [references/tuesday.md](references/tuesday.md) before the Four-Step Sketch — Crazy 8s and solution-sketch templates plus worked examples to show the team.
90 
91## Wednesday: Decide
92 
93**Goal:** Critique solutions and choose the best one to prototype and test.
94 
95### Morning: Sticky Decision
96 
97- **Art museum:** Tape sketches to the wall; review silently (no talking) and mark interesting parts with dot stickers.
98- **Heat map review:** Discuss each sketch for 3 minutes — the facilitator narrates while the anonymous sketcher stays silent; a scribe captures standout ideas on the whiteboard.
99- **Straw poll:** Each person votes for one solution with one sentence of rationale (non-binding).
100- **Supervote:** The Decider gets three large dots; their decision wins.
101 
102### Afternoon: Rumble or All-in-One
103 
104If multiple sketches win, choose: **Rumble** (competing prototypes testing different approaches) or **All-in-One** (combine the best ideas into one prototype — simpler, and what most sprints do).
105 
106- **Storyboard:** Draw a 10-15 panel comic of the test experience: opening scene (how the customer discovers you) → your solution in action → successful outcome. Keep it simple — stick figures, words, arrows — but get specific about the UI. Include just enough detail for Thursday's prototype.
107 
108**Wednesday output:** winning solution(s) and a detailed storyboard ready to prototype.
109 
110See [references/wednesday.md](references/wednesday.md) when running the Sticky Decision and storyboard — facilitation steps for the vote and a panel-by-panel storyboard template.
111 
112## Thursday: Prototype
113 
114**Goal:** Build a realistic facade in one day — you need something to test on Friday.
115 
116**Mindset:** Fake it; prototype only what you'll test. Aim for Goldilocks fidelity — sketches are too low for honest reactions, working code wastes time. It should look real without working for real (facades, click-throughs, video).
117 
118### Assign Roles
119 
120| Role | Responsibility |
121|------|----------------|
122| **Makers** (2+) | Build the prototype pieces (design, assets) |
123| **Stitcher** (1) | Combines pieces into the final prototype (Keynote, Figma) |
124| **Writer** (1) | All copy: headlines, button labels, descriptions |
125| **Collector** (1-2) | Gathers photos, icons, competitor screenshots |
126| **Interviewer** (1) | Writes and rehearses Friday's interview script |
127| **Sprint Master** | Helps where needed, keeps energy up |
128 
129### Build the Prototype
130 
131**Tools:** Figma, Keynote, or PowerPoint linked slides for web/apps; video walkthrough or 3D-printed mockup for physical products; role-play video or scripted interaction for services.
132 
133Morning: divide the storyboard into scenes and assign them to makers. Afternoon: stitch together, review against the storyboard, rehearse the full flow, and run a trial with someone outside the sprint team.
134 
135**Prototype checklist:**
136- [ ] Follows storyboard exactly
137- [ ] Looks real enough to get honest reactions
138- [ ] Can walk through in 5-15 minutes
139- [ ] Interviewer knows how to present it
140- [ ] Trial run completed
141 
142**Thursday output:** realistic prototype, interview script, prepared interview room.
143 
144See [references/thursday.md](references/thursday.md) while building the prototype — tool-by-tool techniques (Keynote/Figma facades, video, mockups) for hitting Goldilocks fidelity in a day.
145 
146## Friday: Test
147 
148**Goal:** Interview 5 customers; learn what works and what doesn't.
149 
150### Setup
151 
152Interview room: quiet space, laptop with the prototype, camera recording screen and customer's face. Observation room: live video feed where the whole team watches and takes notes on a whiteboard. One **Interviewer** conducts all five interviews.
153 
154### The Five-Act Interview
155 
156About 45 minutes per customer (the five acts run ~35 min plus setup and transitions), with 30-minute breaks between to discuss observations and adjust questions. See references/friday.md for the full 9am-5pm schedule.
157 
158| Act | Time | What to Do |
159|-----|------|------------|
160| **1. Friendly welcome** | 5 min | Greet warmly; explain you're testing the prototype, not them; get recording permission; encourage thinking aloud |
161| **2. Context questions** | 5 min | "Tell me about how you currently handle [problem]" — understand mindset and current behavior |
162| **3. Introduce prototype** | 5 min | "What's this? What do you think it's for?" Don't explain — let them interpret |
163| **4. Tasks and nudges** | 15 min | Open-ended exploration, then storyboard tasks. When stuck: "What would you do next?", "What's going through your mind?" Don't help — watch them struggle |
164| **5. Debrief** | 5 min | "What did you think overall?", "Who is this for?", "What worked? What was confusing?" |
165 
166### Five Is the Magic Number
167 
168Patterns emerge after 3-5 people and returns diminish after 5 — and five interview-plus-break slots fit one day (see references/friday.md). Recruit target customers via a screener survey and offer an incentive ($100-$200 B2B, $50-$100 B2C).
169 
170See [references/recruiting.md](references/recruiting.md) two weeks before the sprint — it has screener-survey questions, recruiting channels, scheduling logistics, and incentive guidance for locking in five on-target users.
171 
172### Take Notes: Pattern Recognition
173 
174Capture observations in a grid, one column per customer:
175 
176| Customer 1 | Customer 2 | Customer 3 | Customer 4 | Customer 5 |
177|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|
178| notes | notes | notes | notes | notes |
179 
180Mark each observation **✓** (positive, success), **✗** (negative, failure), or **~** (neutral/mixed). After all five interviews, count marks per row and look for patterns — did all 5 struggle with the same thing?
181 
182### End-of-Sprint Debrief
183 
184Organize findings: **✓ what worked** (flows everyone understood, messaging that resonated), **✗ what failed** (confusing terminology, missing steps, wrong assumptions), **~ mixed** (some got it, some didn't). Then decide next steps:
185 
186- **Core concept validated:** build it, or run the next sprint on details
187- **Major issues:** pivot, or sprint again on the problems
188- **Total failure:** back to the drawing board — you just saved months
189 
190**Friday output:** interview recordings, pattern notes, a clear list of what works and what doesn't, decision on next steps.
191 
192See [references/friday.md](references/friday.md) before interviewing — verbatim Five-Act scripts, note-taking templates, the fuller next-steps decision table, and the common Friday mistakes to avoid.
193 
194## When to Run a Design Sprint
195 
196**Run when:** the decision is high-stakes, there's no time to build and test normally, the team is stuck in endless debate, multiple solutions compete, it's a new product/feature/major redesign, or you need to de-risk before investing.
197 
198**Don't run when:** the problem and solution are obvious and you just need to execute, the team isn't bought in, or you can't get the Decider for the full week.
199 
200See [references/case-studies.md](references/case-studies.md) for worked sprint walk-throughs (Slack, Blue Bottle Coffee, Savioke and more) when you need a concrete precedent for how a sprint played out in a domain like yours.
201 
202## Variations
203 
204- **4-Day Sprint:** Day 1 Map + Sketch (compressed), Day 2 Decide, Day 3 Prototype, Day 4 Test.
205- **Remote Sprint:** Same schedule with Miro/FigJam whiteboards and Zoom. See [references/remote-sprints.md](references/remote-sprints.md) when the team is distributed — it adapts each exercise to digital whiteboards, sets remote time-boxes, and handles video-based prototype testing.
206- **Multi-Sprint:** Sprint 1 chooses direction on a broad problem, Sprint 2 deep-dives the chosen solution, Sprint 3 refines details.
207 
208## Common Mistakes
209 
210| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
211|---------|-------------|------|
212| **Skip prototyping** | Nothing to test | Always prototype, even if simple |
213| **Over-engineer prototype** | Waste time on details that don't matter | Facade only, not working code |
214| **Test with wrong users** | Invalid feedback | Screen for target customers |
215| **Explain prototype to users** | Defeats the test; confusion is the data | Run Acts 3-4 as written — they interpret and struggle unaided |
216| **No decision maker** | Can't commit to decision | Get Decider for full week or don't sprint |
217| **Interruptions** | Breaks focus | Protect the week, no meetings/emails |
218 
219## Quick Diagnostic
220 
221Audit any sprint plan:
222 
223| Question | If No | Action |
224|----------|-------|--------|
225| Do we have a Decider for full week? | Sprint will fail | Get commitment or postpone |
226| Is the problem important enough? | Waste of time | Only sprint on big challenges |
227| Can we prototype in 1 day? | Wrong problem for sprint | Choose more concrete problem |
228| Can we recruit 5 target users? | Can't test properly | Start recruiting now (2 weeks ahead) |
229| Will team commit to no interruptions? | Won't maintain focus | Get buy-in from leadership |
230 
231## Further Reading
232 
233For the complete methodology, exercises, and case studies:
234 
235- *"Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days"* by Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, Braden Kowitz
236 
237## About the Author
238 
239**Jake Knapp** created the Design Sprint at Google, where he ran sprints on Gmail, Chrome, and Google X, then refined the process across 100+ startup sprints as a design partner at Google Ventures. The sprint is now used at Google, Slack, Airbnb, LEGO, and thousands of companies worldwide. He is also the author of *Make Time*.
240 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 10, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 2,235
Checked
Source
wondelai/skills ↗
Creator
wondelai · 320 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
MCP3-5 days | Agents: 6 | Gate Keepers: DevOps Automator +⚙️ Phase 2 Playbook — Foundation & Scaffoldingmsitarzewski/agency-agents · by msitarzewski> Duration: 3-5 days | Agents: 6 | Gate Keepers: DevOps Automator + Evidence Collector★ 154k GitHub starsMCPNEXUS transforms The Agency's independent AI specialists🌐 NEXUS — Network of EXperts, Unified in Strategymsitarzewski/agency-agents · by msitarzewski> NEXUS transforms The Agency's independent AI specialists into a synchronized intelligence network. This is not a prompt collection — it…★ 154k GitHub starsSkillGenerate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategiesphuryn/pm-skills · by phurynGenerate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. Use when considering growth options, planning market expansion, or evaluating strategic growth paths.★ 26.6k GitHub starsSkillSurvey any codebase as a senior advisorImproveshadcn/improve · by shadcnSurvey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.★ 9.2k GitHub starsSkillTranslate skills from one industry to anotherCareer changer translatorParamchoudhary/ResumeSkills · by ParamchoudharyTranslate skills from one industry to another, identify transferable skills★ 2.4k GitHub starsSkillA collection of 37 battle-tested marketing skillsOpenClaw Marketing SkillsLeoYeAI/openclaw-marketing-skills · by LeoYeAIA collection of 37 battle-tested marketing skills for OpenClaw agents. Use when you want to install or reference any marketing skill including: CRO (page-cro, signup-flow-cro, onboarding-cro, form-cro, popup-cro, paywall-upgrade-cro), copywriting, copy-editing, cold-email, email-sequence, social-content, seo-audit, ai-seo, programmatic-seo, site-architecture, schema-markup, content-strategy, paid-ads, ad-creative, ab-test-setup, analytics-tracking, referral-program, free-tool-strategy, churn-prevention, revops, sales-enablement, launch-strategy, pricing-strategy, competitor-alternatives, marketing-ideas, marketing-psychology, lead-magnets, product-marketing-context, and data connectors (google-ads-connect, search-console-connect, meta-ads-connect, x-twitter-connect). Start with product-marketing-context to set up your product context document, then use any other skill naturally. Powered by MyClaw.ai.★ 1k GitHub stars

More from wondelai

SkillManage software complexity through deep modulesA Philosophy of Software Design Frameworkwondelai/skills · by wondelaiManage software complexity through deep modules, information hiding, and strategic programming. Use when the user mentions "module design", "API too complex", "shallow class", "complexity budget", "strategic vs tactical", "deep module", "information leakage", "pass-through method", "this code is over-engineered", or "simplify this design". Also trigger when reviewing an interface for simplicity, evaluating whether an abstraction is pulling its weight, deciding whether a comment is worth writing, or choosing between general-purpose and special-purpose approaches. Covers deep vs shallow modules, red flags for complexity, and comments as design documentation. For code quality, see clean-code. For architecture boundaries, see clean-architecture.★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillMetrics are the language of validated learningActionable metrics guidewondelai/skills · by wondelaiMetrics are the language of validated learning. The wrong metrics create the illusion of progress while the startup drifts toward failure.…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillAdvertising media is the vehicle that carries your messagewondelai/skills · by wondelaiAdvertising media is the vehicle that carries your message to your target market. Choosing the right media is not about what is trendy — it…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillAn affordance is a relationship between an objectAffordances: Designing for Actionwondelai/skills · by wondelaiAn affordance is a relationship between an object and a person that determines how the object could possibly be used. A chair affords…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillLean UX was designed to work inside Agile development teamsAgile integration for lean UXwondelai/skills · by wondelaiLean UX was designed to work inside Agile development teams, not alongside them. The central mechanism is dual-track agile, where a…★ 2.2k GitHub starsSkillThis reference translates the AMP framework from theoryAMP Applied: Practical Applications of Autonomy, Mastery, and Purposewondelai/skills · by wondelaiThis reference translates the AMP framework from theory into practice across six domains: product gamification, team management,…★ 2.2k GitHub stars