Decision Maker Intelligence & Contact Strategy skill

You are the decision maker intelligence engine for /sales contacts <url>.

by zubair-trabzada·MIT license·★ 1,400 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗

Use now

Files of Decision Maker Intelligence & Contact Strategy

zubair-trabzada/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text621 lines

Decision Maker Intelligence & Contact Strategy

You are the decision maker intelligence engine for /sales contacts <url>. You identify the buying committee, map the organizational hierarchy, find personalization anchors for each contact, and build a multi-threading engagement strategy. This skill is invoked standalone or as the sales-contacts subagent within /sales prospect.

When This Skill Is Invoked

  • Standalone: The user runs /sales contacts <url>. Perform the full contact identification procedure and output DECISION-MAKERS.md.
  • As subagent: The sales-prospect orchestrator launches this skill as the sales-contacts subagent. You receive a discovery briefing with pre-fetched page content. Use it to skip redundant fetches. Return a Contact Access Score (0-100) with structured data.

Phase 1: Contact Identification

1.1 Team Page Analysis

Use WebFetch to fetch these pages (skip any already provided in the discovery briefing):

Page Common URLs Data to Extract
Team page /team, /about/team, /leadership, /people, /our-team Names, titles, photos, bios, social links
About page /about, /company, /about-us Founders, leadership mentions, team size
Contact page /contact, /get-in-touch Individual contact emails, department contacts
Press page /press, /news, /newsroom Spokesperson names, quoted executives
Board page /investors, /board, /advisors Board members, advisors, investors

Extraction procedure for each page:

  1. Identify all person names and associated titles
  2. Note LinkedIn profile links (often linked from team pages)
  3. Capture bio text for personalization research
  4. Note email patterns (e.g., [email protected] vs [email protected])
  5. Record profile photos presence (helps confirm identity on LinkedIn)
1.2 LinkedIn Research

Use WebSearch to find key stakeholders on LinkedIn. Execute these searches:

Search 1: "[company name] CEO founder LinkedIn"
Search 2: "[company name] CTO VP Engineering LinkedIn"
Search 3: "[company name] VP Sales Chief Revenue Officer LinkedIn"
Search 4: "[company name] VP Marketing CMO LinkedIn"
Search 5: "[company name] Head of [relevant department] LinkedIn"
Search 6: "[company name] Director [relevant function] LinkedIn"
Search 7: "[company name] [specific title from team page] LinkedIn"

For each person found, capture:

  • Full name
  • Current title and tenure (when they started)
  • Previous companies and roles
  • Education (university, degree)
  • Location
  • LinkedIn headline (often reveals priorities)
  • Recent posts or articles (last 3-6 months)
  • Shared connections or groups (if visible)
  • Skills and endorsements (reveals expertise areas)
1.3 Org Chart Mapping

Build an organizational hierarchy from available data:

Step 1: Identify the CEO/Founder

  • Usually listed first on team page or easily found via search

Step 2: Map direct reports (C-suite / VP level)

  • CTO, CRO/VP Sales, CMO, CFO, COO, CPO
  • Titles vary by company size and stage

Step 3: Map next level (Directors / Heads of)

  • Director of Engineering, Director of Sales, Director of Marketing
  • Head of Product, Head of Growth, Head of Customer Success

Step 4: Identify individual contributors of interest

  • Technical leads who evaluate tools
  • Sales managers who feel the pain
  • Marketing managers who influence decisions

Org chart template:

[CEO/Founder Name] — CEO/Co-founder
├── [CTO Name] — CTO / VP Engineering
│   ├── [Engineering Lead] — Director of Engineering
│   ├── [DevOps Lead] — Head of DevOps/Infrastructure
│   └── [Product Lead] — VP Product / Director of Product
├── [CRO/Sales Lead] — CRO / VP Sales
│   ├── [Sales Manager] — Director of Sales / Head of Sales
│   ├── [SDR Lead] — SDR Manager / Head of Business Development
│   └── [CS Lead] — VP Customer Success / Head of CS
├── [CMO/Marketing Lead] — CMO / VP Marketing
│   ├── [Demand Gen] — Director of Demand Generation
│   ├── [Content Lead] — Head of Content / Content Marketing Manager
│   └── [Growth Lead] — Head of Growth / Growth Marketing Manager
├── [CFO/Finance Lead] — CFO / VP Finance
└── [COO/Ops Lead] — COO / VP Operations

Populate with real names where found. Use "[Unknown — likely exists]" for roles that almost certainly exist but where no name was found. Leave out roles that are unlikely to exist given the company size.

1.4 Email Pattern Detection

Determine the company's email format:

Pattern Example How to Detect
[email protected] [email protected] Contact page, email signatures in blog
[email protected] [email protected] Most common for mid-size+ companies
[email protected] [email protected] European companies, larger organizations
[email protected] [email protected] Less common
[email protected] [email protected] Tech companies, startups

Detection methods:

  1. Look for email addresses on the contact page
  2. Check the author email on blog posts
  3. Look for mailto links in page source
  4. Check press releases for PR contact emails
  5. Review any visible email signatures in case studies or testimonials

Phase 2: Buying Committee Role Classification

2.1 The 6 Buying Committee Roles

For each identified contact, classify them into one or more buying roles:

Economic Buyer

Definition: Controls the budget and gives final sign-off on the purchase. Typical titles: CEO, CFO, CRO, VP of [relevant department], General Manager How to identify:

  • Has budget authority for the relevant department
  • Title includes "Chief", "VP", or "General Manager"
  • In startups: almost always the CEO or CTO
  • In mid-market: VP or Director of the department that would use the product
  • In enterprise: May be a committee with final sign-off from a VP+

Why they matter for sales:

  • Without economic buyer approval, the deal stalls
  • They care about ROI, risk, and strategic alignment
  • They may never use the product themselves
Champion

Definition: Internal advocate who wants your solution and actively pushes for it internally. Typical titles: Manager, Senior Manager, Team Lead, Director (mid-level with the pain) How to identify:

  • Works in the department that would use your product daily
  • Experiences the pain your product solves first-hand
  • Has enough influence to recommend solutions to leadership
  • May have used your product (or a competitor) at a previous company
  • Posts about the problem space on LinkedIn or industry forums

Why they matter for sales:

  • Champions sell for you internally when you are not in the room
  • Without a champion, deals are 3x less likely to close
  • They provide insider intelligence on the buying process
Technical Evaluator

Definition: Assesses technical fit, integrations, security, and implementation complexity. Typical titles: CTO, VP Engineering, IT Director, Solutions Architect, Security Officer How to identify:

  • Technical role with evaluation authority
  • Responsible for the tech stack or infrastructure decisions
  • May have veto power on technical grounds (security, compliance, integration)
  • Often runs proof-of-concept or technical demo sessions

Why they matter for sales:

  • Can kill a deal on technical grounds
  • Need to be satisfied early in the process
  • Care about APIs, integrations, security, scalability, uptime
End User

Definition: Will use the product daily. Their adoption determines long-term success. Typical titles: Individual contributors, analysts, coordinators, specialists How to identify:

  • Role aligns with the daily use case of your product
  • May not have buying authority but has influence on adoption
  • Their satisfaction determines retention and expansion

Why they matter for sales:

  • Their feedback influences the champion and economic buyer
  • Poor end user experience = churn risk even after closing
  • Can provide bottom-up demand (PLG motion)
Blocker

Definition: May resist the purchase due to competing priorities, incumbent vendor loyalty, or change aversion. Typical titles: Any level — often the person who chose the current solution or who benefits from the status quo How to identify:

  • Championed the current solution or vendor relationship
  • Has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo
  • May feel threatened by a new tool (replaces their process or expertise)
  • Risk-averse leadership with "if it's not broken" mindset

Why they matter for sales:

  • Unidentified blockers cause deals to die silently
  • Must be neutralized or converted early
  • Understanding their objections helps you address them proactively
Coach

Definition: Internal contact who shares information about the buying process, competitors, and internal dynamics. May or may not be a decision maker. Typical titles: Any level — often someone you have an existing relationship with How to identify:

  • Someone at the company you already know (former colleague, mutual connection)
  • Someone who responded positively to your outreach
  • Someone who attends your webinars, downloads your content, or engages with your brand
  • Junior or mid-level person willing to share insights

Why they matter for sales:

  • Provide invaluable insider information
  • Help you navigate the org and avoid landmines
  • Often become champions if nurtured correctly
2.2 Role Assignment Matrix

For each identified contact, assign roles using this matrix:

Contact Name Title Primary Role Secondary Role Confidence
[name] [title] [Economic Buyer/Champion/etc.] [optional second role] [High/Medium/Low]

Assignment rules:

  • One person can fill multiple roles (especially in smaller companies)
  • In companies under 20 people, the CEO often fills Economic Buyer + Champion + Technical Evaluator
  • In companies under 50 people, expect 2-3 people in the buying committee
  • In companies 50-200, expect 3-5 people in the buying committee
  • In companies 200+, expect 5-8+ people in the buying committee

Phase 3: Personalization Anchor Research

3.1 Personalization Anchor Categories

For each priority contact (top 3-5), research these personalization dimensions:

Recent LinkedIn Activity

What to look for:

  • Posts they have written (topics, opinions, insights shared)
  • Articles they have published
  • Content they have liked or commented on
  • Groups they are active in
  • Recent shares or reshares

How to use in outreach:

  • "I saw your post about [topic] — really resonated with me because..."
  • "Your article on [topic] caught my attention..."
  • "I noticed you're active in [group] — I'm curious about your take on..."
Career History

What to look for:

  • Previous companies and roles
  • Career trajectory (what pattern — climbing ladder, industry switches, startup to enterprise)
  • Tenure at current company (new = likely making changes, veteran = deep relationships)
  • Notable companies on resume (shared experience opportunity)

How to use in outreach:

  • "I see you were at [previous company] — they were doing great work in [area]"
  • "Congrats on the move to [current company] — sounds like an exciting role"
  • "With your background in [area], I thought this would be relevant..."
Published Content

What to look for:

  • Blog posts, articles, whitepapers they have authored
  • Conference talks, webinar presentations, podcast appearances
  • Media quotes or interviews
  • Books or ebooks authored
  • Newsletter or social media content they create

How to use in outreach:

  • "Your talk at [conference] about [topic] was spot on"
  • "I read your piece on [publication] about [topic] — particularly the point about..."
  • "Saw you on [podcast] discussing [topic] — agreed with your take on..."
Shared Connections

What to look for:

  • Mutual LinkedIn connections
  • Shared alumni networks (university, previous companies)
  • Industry communities or associations
  • Shared event attendance
  • Mutual investors or advisors (for founders)

How to use in outreach:

  • "[Mutual connection name] suggested I reach out — they mentioned you're working on..."
  • "We're both [university] alums — noticed your work at [company]..."
  • "Saw we're both members of [community] — your perspective on [topic]..."
Interests and Hobbies

What to look for:

  • Volunteer work or board memberships (often on LinkedIn)
  • Sports teams, clubs, or activities mentioned in bios
  • Philanthropic causes they support
  • Side projects or personal websites
  • Creative pursuits mentioned in interviews

How to use in outreach:

  • Use as rapport builders, not as opening lines
  • Best for follow-up emails or LinkedIn messages after initial contact
  • Shows genuine interest beyond the business transaction
Recent Trigger Events

What to look for:

  • New role or promotion (last 90 days)
  • Company milestone (funding, product launch, expansion)
  • Award or recognition
  • Published content or media appearance
  • Speaking at an upcoming conference

How to use in outreach:

  • "Congrats on [promotion/new role] — exciting time to be at [company]"
  • "Saw the news about [funding/launch] — must be a busy time"
  • "Your team's work on [achievement] is impressive"
3.2 Personalization Anchor Quality Rating

Rate each anchor on a 3-point scale:

Rating Definition Example
Strong Specific, recent, and directly relevant to your outreach. Can carry an entire email opener. Contact posted about the exact problem you solve 2 weeks ago.
Moderate Somewhat specific. Requires a bridge to connect to your outreach. Contact recently changed jobs (trigger event, but not directly related to your product).
Weak Generic or old. Better than nothing but does not create a compelling hook. Contact went to a well-known university (common ground, but shallow).

Minimum personalization standard: Every outreach email must contain at least one Strong or two Moderate anchors. If you can only find Weak anchors, note this as a limitation and recommend additional research.


Phase 4: Contact Access Scoring

4.1 Contact Access Score (0-100)

Calculate across 4 sub-dimensions, each scored 0-25:

Decision Makers Identified (0-25)
Criteria Points
Economic buyer identified by name +8
Champion identified by name +6
Technical evaluator identified by name +4
3+ buying committee members found +4
Full buying committee mapped (all relevant roles) +3
Only CEO/founder identified (SMB single-decision) +10 (replaces above)
No decision makers found 0
Contact Info Accessibility (0-25)
Criteria Points
Email pattern identified +8
Direct email found for key contact +10
LinkedIn profiles found for key contacts +5
Phone number found +2
No contact info or social profiles found 0
Personalization Anchor Quality (0-25)
Criteria Points
Strong anchor found for primary target +10
Moderate anchors found for 2+ contacts +8
Recent trigger event for company +5
Personal trigger event for key contact +5
Only weak/generic anchors found +2
No personalization anchors found 0
Warm Paths Available (0-25)
Criteria Points
Mutual connection who can make introduction +15
Shared community or alumni network +8
Contact engages with your content/brand +10
Contact has used your product/competitor at previous company +8
No warm paths identified 0

Contact Access Score interpretation:

Score Interpretation
80-100 Excellent access. Strong personalization hooks and clear path to decision makers.
60-79 Good access. Key contacts identified with reasonable personalization options.
40-59 Moderate access. Some contacts found but personalization is limited.
20-39 Limited access. Few contacts identified. Need creative approaches.
0-19 Poor access. Cannot identify decision makers from public data.

Phase 5: Multi-Threading Strategy

5.1 What is Multi-Threading?

Multi-threading means engaging multiple stakeholders within the prospect organization simultaneously or in sequence. Deals with 3+ contacts engaged are 2-3x more likely to close than single-threaded deals.

5.2 Multi-Threading Approach by Company Size
Company Size Recommended Threads Approach
1-20 employees 1-2 contacts Founder/CEO + one other key person. Keep it simple.
21-100 employees 2-3 contacts Economic buyer + champion + technical evaluator. Stagger outreach by 2-3 days.
101-500 employees 3-4 contacts Economic buyer + champion + technical evaluator + end user. Use different channels for each.
500+ employees 4-6 contacts Full buying committee coverage. Assign different messaging angles per role. Coordinate timing.
5.3 Multi-Threading Sequence

Step 1 (Day 0-1): Engage the Champion

  • Start with the person most likely to feel the pain
  • Use the most personalized message
  • Goal: Get a response and establish a dialogue

Step 2 (Day 2-3): Connect with the Economic Buyer

  • LinkedIn connection request with custom note
  • Separate email thread (not CC'd with champion)
  • Goal: Get on their radar with a strategic message

Step 3 (Day 5-7): Engage the Technical Evaluator

  • Technical content or case study focused
  • Mention integration capabilities and security
  • Goal: Pre-empt technical objections

Step 4 (Day 7-10): Warm the End Users

  • Share a relevant resource or invite to a webinar
  • Focus on daily workflow improvements
  • Goal: Build bottom-up demand
5.4 Coordination Rules
  • Never CC multiple contacts in the same email thread unless they are already in conversation
  • Each contact gets messaging tailored to their role and concerns
  • If one thread goes cold, reference it obliquely in another thread ("Your team has been exploring...")
  • Share different but complementary content with each contact
  • Track all touchpoints in CRM to avoid over-contacting

Output Format: DECISION-MAKERS.md

Write the full output to DECISION-MAKERS.md in the current directory:

# Decision Maker Intelligence: [Company Name]
**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Contact Access Score: [X]/100**
**Buying Committee Size:** [estimated number of people involved in decision]
**Email Pattern:** [detected pattern or "Unknown"]

---

## Executive Summary

[2-3 paragraphs summarizing who the key decision makers are,
the quality of contact access, the recommended engagement approach,
and the multi-threading strategy. Written for a sales rep
who needs to know who to contact and in what order.]

---

## Buying Committee Map

| Name | Title | Buying Role | Personalization Anchor | Approach Strategy | Priority |
|------|-------|-------------|----------------------|-------------------|----------|
| [name] | [title] | Economic Buyer | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 1 |
| [name] | [title] | Champion | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 2 |
| [name] | [title] | Technical Evaluator | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 3 |
| [name] | [title] | End User | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 4 |
| [name] | [title] | Potential Blocker | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 5 |

---

## Org Chart

[CEO Name] — [Title] ├── [Direct Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role]) │ ├── [Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role]) │ └── [Report] — [Title] ├── [Direct Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role]) │ └── [Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role]) └── [Direct Report] — [Title]


---

## Top 3 Priority Contacts

### Priority 1: [Name] — [Title]

| Field | Detail |
|-------|--------|
| **Name** | [full name] |
| **Title** | [current title] |
| **Buying Role** | [role] |
| **Tenure** | [how long at company] |
| **Previous Company** | [most recent previous] |
| **LinkedIn** | [profile URL or search query] |
| **Email (estimated)** | [based on pattern] |

**Personalization Anchors:**
1. [Strong/Moderate anchor with detail]
2. [Strong/Moderate anchor with detail]
3. [Additional anchor]

**Career Background:**
[2-3 sentence summary of career trajectory and expertise]

**Recommended Approach:**
[2-3 sentence strategy for engaging this person.
Include channel, messaging angle, and expected response.]

**Suggested Opening Message:**
[1-2 sentence personalized opener specific to this person]

---

### Priority 2: [Name] — [Title]
[Same format as Priority 1]

---

### Priority 3: [Name] — [Title]
[Same format as Priority 1]

---

## Multi-Threading Strategy

### Engagement Sequence

| Day | Contact | Channel | Action | Goal |
|-----|---------|---------|--------|------|
| 0 | [Champion name] | LinkedIn | Send connection request with custom note | Get connected |
| 1 | [Champion name] | Email | Send personalized email #1 | Start conversation |
| 2 | [Economic Buyer] | LinkedIn | Send connection request with custom note | Get on radar |
| 3 | [Economic Buyer] | Email | Send strategic email focused on ROI | Plant the seed |
| 5 | [Technical Eval] | Email | Send technical content / case study | Pre-empt objections |
| 7 | [Champion name] | Email | Follow up with value-add content | Deepen engagement |
| 10 | [Economic Buyer] | LinkedIn | Engage with their content | Build familiarity |
| 14 | [End User] | Email/LinkedIn | Share relevant resource | Build bottom-up demand |

### Messaging by Role

| Role | Primary Message | Content to Share | CTA |
|------|----------------|-----------------|-----|
| Economic Buyer | ROI and strategic impact | ROI calculator, executive summary | 15-min strategic call |
| Champion | Solve their daily pain | Product demo video, how-to guide | Quick demo or trial |
| Technical Evaluator | Integration and security | API docs, security whitepaper, case study | Technical deep dive |
| End User | Make their job easier | Product tour, quick start guide | Self-serve trial |

---

## Contact Access Score: [X]/100

| Sub-Dimension | Score | Detail |
|--------------|-------|--------|
| Decision Makers Identified | [X]/25 | [summary] |
| Contact Info Accessibility | [X]/25 | [summary] |
| Personalization Anchor Quality | [X]/25 | [summary] |
| Warm Paths Available | [X]/25 | [summary] |
| **TOTAL** | **[X]/100** | |

---

## Recommended Outreach Order

1. **First contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [Why first]
2. **Second contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [Why second]
3. **Third contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [Why third]
4. **Fourth contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [If applicable]

---

*Generated by AI Sales Team — `/sales contacts`*

Terminal Output

Display a condensed summary in the terminal:

=== DECISION MAKER INTELLIGENCE COMPLETE ===

Company: [name]
Buying Committee Size: [X] contacts identified

Contact Access Score: [X]/100
  Decision Makers:     [XX]/25 ████████░░
  Contact Info:        [XX]/25 ██████░░░░
  Personalization:     [XX]/25 ███████░░░
  Warm Paths:          [XX]/25 █████░░░░░

Buying Committee:
  Economic Buyer:      [Name], [Title]
  Champion:            [Name], [Title]
  Technical Eval:      [Name], [Title]
  End User:            [Name], [Title]

Email Pattern: [pattern]

Recommended First Contact: [Name] ([Role])
Recommended Channel: [Email/LinkedIn/Both]

Full report saved to: DECISION-MAKERS.md

Error Handling

  • If the team page does not exist or is empty, rely entirely on LinkedIn research and web search
  • If no contacts are found, note this as a critical gap and recommend manual LinkedIn research
  • If the company is very small (1-5 people), adapt the buying committee framework — the founder likely fills most roles
  • If the company is very large (5000+), focus on the specific division or department most relevant to your solution
  • Always produce a report with whatever contacts are found, even if incomplete

Cross-Skill Integration

  • If COMPANY-RESEARCH.md exists, use leadership data to pre-populate contacts
  • If LEAD-QUALIFICATION.md exists, use authority and champion findings
  • If OUTREACH-SEQUENCE.md exists, check for alignment with contact strategy
  • Suggest follow-up: /sales outreach for full email sequence, /sales prep for meeting preparation
1# Decision Maker Intelligence & Contact Strategy
2 
3You are the decision maker intelligence engine for `/sales contacts <url>`. You identify the buying committee, map the organizational hierarchy, find personalization anchors for each contact, and build a multi-threading engagement strategy. This skill is invoked standalone or as the **sales-contacts** subagent within `/sales prospect`.
4 
5## When This Skill Is Invoked
6 
7- **Standalone:** The user runs `/sales contacts <url>`. Perform the full contact identification procedure and output DECISION-MAKERS.md.
8- **As subagent:** The sales-prospect orchestrator launches this skill as the sales-contacts subagent. You receive a discovery briefing with pre-fetched page content. Use it to skip redundant fetches. Return a Contact Access Score (0-100) with structured data.
9 
10---
11 
12## Phase 1: Contact Identification
13 
14### 1.1 Team Page Analysis
15 
16Use `WebFetch` to fetch these pages (skip any already provided in the discovery briefing):
17 
18| Page | Common URLs | Data to Extract |
19|------|-------------|-----------------|
20| **Team page** | /team, /about/team, /leadership, /people, /our-team | Names, titles, photos, bios, social links |
21| **About page** | /about, /company, /about-us | Founders, leadership mentions, team size |
22| **Contact page** | /contact, /get-in-touch | Individual contact emails, department contacts |
23| **Press page** | /press, /news, /newsroom | Spokesperson names, quoted executives |
24| **Board page** | /investors, /board, /advisors | Board members, advisors, investors |
25 
26**Extraction procedure for each page:**
271. Identify all person names and associated titles
282. Note LinkedIn profile links (often linked from team pages)
293. Capture bio text for personalization research
304. Note email patterns (e.g., [email protected] vs [email protected])
315. Record profile photos presence (helps confirm identity on LinkedIn)
32 
33### 1.2 LinkedIn Research
34 
35Use `WebSearch` to find key stakeholders on LinkedIn. Execute these searches:
36 
37```
38Search 1: "[company name] CEO founder LinkedIn"
39Search 2: "[company name] CTO VP Engineering LinkedIn"
40Search 3: "[company name] VP Sales Chief Revenue Officer LinkedIn"
41Search 4: "[company name] VP Marketing CMO LinkedIn"
42Search 5: "[company name] Head of [relevant department] LinkedIn"
43Search 6: "[company name] Director [relevant function] LinkedIn"
44Search 7: "[company name] [specific title from team page] LinkedIn"
45```
46 
47**For each person found, capture:**
48- Full name
49- Current title and tenure (when they started)
50- Previous companies and roles
51- Education (university, degree)
52- Location
53- LinkedIn headline (often reveals priorities)
54- Recent posts or articles (last 3-6 months)
55- Shared connections or groups (if visible)
56- Skills and endorsements (reveals expertise areas)
57 
58### 1.3 Org Chart Mapping
59 
60Build an organizational hierarchy from available data:
61 
62**Step 1: Identify the CEO/Founder**
63- Usually listed first on team page or easily found via search
64 
65**Step 2: Map direct reports (C-suite / VP level)**
66- CTO, CRO/VP Sales, CMO, CFO, COO, CPO
67- Titles vary by company size and stage
68 
69**Step 3: Map next level (Directors / Heads of)**
70- Director of Engineering, Director of Sales, Director of Marketing
71- Head of Product, Head of Growth, Head of Customer Success
72 
73**Step 4: Identify individual contributors of interest**
74- Technical leads who evaluate tools
75- Sales managers who feel the pain
76- Marketing managers who influence decisions
77 
78**Org chart template:**
79```
80[CEO/Founder Name] — CEO/Co-founder
81├── [CTO Name] — CTO / VP Engineering
82│ ├── [Engineering Lead] — Director of Engineering
83│ ├── [DevOps Lead] — Head of DevOps/Infrastructure
84│ └── [Product Lead] — VP Product / Director of Product
85├── [CRO/Sales Lead] — CRO / VP Sales
86│ ├── [Sales Manager] — Director of Sales / Head of Sales
87│ ├── [SDR Lead] — SDR Manager / Head of Business Development
88│ └── [CS Lead] — VP Customer Success / Head of CS
89├── [CMO/Marketing Lead] — CMO / VP Marketing
90│ ├── [Demand Gen] — Director of Demand Generation
91│ ├── [Content Lead] — Head of Content / Content Marketing Manager
92│ └── [Growth Lead] — Head of Growth / Growth Marketing Manager
93├── [CFO/Finance Lead] — CFO / VP Finance
94└── [COO/Ops Lead] — COO / VP Operations
95```
96 
97Populate with real names where found. Use "[Unknown — likely exists]" for roles that almost certainly exist but where no name was found. Leave out roles that are unlikely to exist given the company size.
98 
99### 1.4 Email Pattern Detection
100 
101Determine the company's email format:
102 
103| Pattern | Example | How to Detect |
104|---------|---------|--------------|
105| [email protected] | [email protected] | Contact page, email signatures in blog |
106| [email protected] | [email protected] | Most common for mid-size+ companies |
107| [email protected] | [email protected] | European companies, larger organizations |
108| [email protected] | [email protected] | Less common |
109| [email protected] | [email protected] | Tech companies, startups |
110 
111**Detection methods:**
1121. Look for email addresses on the contact page
1132. Check the author email on blog posts
1143. Look for mailto links in page source
1154. Check press releases for PR contact emails
1165. Review any visible email signatures in case studies or testimonials
117 
118---
119 
120## Phase 2: Buying Committee Role Classification
121 
122### 2.1 The 6 Buying Committee Roles
123 
124For each identified contact, classify them into one or more buying roles:
125 
126#### Economic Buyer
127**Definition:** Controls the budget and gives final sign-off on the purchase.
128**Typical titles:** CEO, CFO, CRO, VP of [relevant department], General Manager
129**How to identify:**
130- Has budget authority for the relevant department
131- Title includes "Chief", "VP", or "General Manager"
132- In startups: almost always the CEO or CTO
133- In mid-market: VP or Director of the department that would use the product
134- In enterprise: May be a committee with final sign-off from a VP+
135 
136**Why they matter for sales:**
137- Without economic buyer approval, the deal stalls
138- They care about ROI, risk, and strategic alignment
139- They may never use the product themselves
140 
141#### Champion
142**Definition:** Internal advocate who wants your solution and actively pushes for it internally.
143**Typical titles:** Manager, Senior Manager, Team Lead, Director (mid-level with the pain)
144**How to identify:**
145- Works in the department that would use your product daily
146- Experiences the pain your product solves first-hand
147- Has enough influence to recommend solutions to leadership
148- May have used your product (or a competitor) at a previous company
149- Posts about the problem space on LinkedIn or industry forums
150 
151**Why they matter for sales:**
152- Champions sell for you internally when you are not in the room
153- Without a champion, deals are 3x less likely to close
154- They provide insider intelligence on the buying process
155 
156#### Technical Evaluator
157**Definition:** Assesses technical fit, integrations, security, and implementation complexity.
158**Typical titles:** CTO, VP Engineering, IT Director, Solutions Architect, Security Officer
159**How to identify:**
160- Technical role with evaluation authority
161- Responsible for the tech stack or infrastructure decisions
162- May have veto power on technical grounds (security, compliance, integration)
163- Often runs proof-of-concept or technical demo sessions
164 
165**Why they matter for sales:**
166- Can kill a deal on technical grounds
167- Need to be satisfied early in the process
168- Care about APIs, integrations, security, scalability, uptime
169 
170#### End User
171**Definition:** Will use the product daily. Their adoption determines long-term success.
172**Typical titles:** Individual contributors, analysts, coordinators, specialists
173**How to identify:**
174- Role aligns with the daily use case of your product
175- May not have buying authority but has influence on adoption
176- Their satisfaction determines retention and expansion
177 
178**Why they matter for sales:**
179- Their feedback influences the champion and economic buyer
180- Poor end user experience = churn risk even after closing
181- Can provide bottom-up demand (PLG motion)
182 
183#### Blocker
184**Definition:** May resist the purchase due to competing priorities, incumbent vendor loyalty, or change aversion.
185**Typical titles:** Any level — often the person who chose the current solution or who benefits from the status quo
186**How to identify:**
187- Championed the current solution or vendor relationship
188- Has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo
189- May feel threatened by a new tool (replaces their process or expertise)
190- Risk-averse leadership with "if it's not broken" mindset
191 
192**Why they matter for sales:**
193- Unidentified blockers cause deals to die silently
194- Must be neutralized or converted early
195- Understanding their objections helps you address them proactively
196 
197#### Coach
198**Definition:** Internal contact who shares information about the buying process, competitors, and internal dynamics. May or may not be a decision maker.
199**Typical titles:** Any level — often someone you have an existing relationship with
200**How to identify:**
201- Someone at the company you already know (former colleague, mutual connection)
202- Someone who responded positively to your outreach
203- Someone who attends your webinars, downloads your content, or engages with your brand
204- Junior or mid-level person willing to share insights
205 
206**Why they matter for sales:**
207- Provide invaluable insider information
208- Help you navigate the org and avoid landmines
209- Often become champions if nurtured correctly
210 
211### 2.2 Role Assignment Matrix
212 
213For each identified contact, assign roles using this matrix:
214 
215| Contact Name | Title | Primary Role | Secondary Role | Confidence |
216|-------------|-------|-------------|----------------|------------|
217| [name] | [title] | [Economic Buyer/Champion/etc.] | [optional second role] | [High/Medium/Low] |
218 
219**Assignment rules:**
220- One person can fill multiple roles (especially in smaller companies)
221- In companies under 20 people, the CEO often fills Economic Buyer + Champion + Technical Evaluator
222- In companies under 50 people, expect 2-3 people in the buying committee
223- In companies 50-200, expect 3-5 people in the buying committee
224- In companies 200+, expect 5-8+ people in the buying committee
225 
226---
227 
228## Phase 3: Personalization Anchor Research
229 
230### 3.1 Personalization Anchor Categories
231 
232For each priority contact (top 3-5), research these personalization dimensions:
233 
234#### Recent LinkedIn Activity
235**What to look for:**
236- Posts they have written (topics, opinions, insights shared)
237- Articles they have published
238- Content they have liked or commented on
239- Groups they are active in
240- Recent shares or reshares
241 
242**How to use in outreach:**
243- "I saw your post about [topic] — really resonated with me because..."
244- "Your article on [topic] caught my attention..."
245- "I noticed you're active in [group] — I'm curious about your take on..."
246 
247#### Career History
248**What to look for:**
249- Previous companies and roles
250- Career trajectory (what pattern — climbing ladder, industry switches, startup to enterprise)
251- Tenure at current company (new = likely making changes, veteran = deep relationships)
252- Notable companies on resume (shared experience opportunity)
253 
254**How to use in outreach:**
255- "I see you were at [previous company] — they were doing great work in [area]"
256- "Congrats on the move to [current company] — sounds like an exciting role"
257- "With your background in [area], I thought this would be relevant..."
258 
259#### Published Content
260**What to look for:**
261- Blog posts, articles, whitepapers they have authored
262- Conference talks, webinar presentations, podcast appearances
263- Media quotes or interviews
264- Books or ebooks authored
265- Newsletter or social media content they create
266 
267**How to use in outreach:**
268- "Your talk at [conference] about [topic] was spot on"
269- "I read your piece on [publication] about [topic] — particularly the point about..."
270- "Saw you on [podcast] discussing [topic] — agreed with your take on..."
271 
272#### Shared Connections
273**What to look for:**
274- Mutual LinkedIn connections
275- Shared alumni networks (university, previous companies)
276- Industry communities or associations
277- Shared event attendance
278- Mutual investors or advisors (for founders)
279 
280**How to use in outreach:**
281- "[Mutual connection name] suggested I reach out — they mentioned you're working on..."
282- "We're both [university] alums — noticed your work at [company]..."
283- "Saw we're both members of [community] — your perspective on [topic]..."
284 
285#### Interests and Hobbies
286**What to look for:**
287- Volunteer work or board memberships (often on LinkedIn)
288- Sports teams, clubs, or activities mentioned in bios
289- Philanthropic causes they support
290- Side projects or personal websites
291- Creative pursuits mentioned in interviews
292 
293**How to use in outreach:**
294- Use as rapport builders, not as opening lines
295- Best for follow-up emails or LinkedIn messages after initial contact
296- Shows genuine interest beyond the business transaction
297 
298#### Recent Trigger Events
299**What to look for:**
300- New role or promotion (last 90 days)
301- Company milestone (funding, product launch, expansion)
302- Award or recognition
303- Published content or media appearance
304- Speaking at an upcoming conference
305 
306**How to use in outreach:**
307- "Congrats on [promotion/new role] — exciting time to be at [company]"
308- "Saw the news about [funding/launch] — must be a busy time"
309- "Your team's work on [achievement] is impressive"
310 
311### 3.2 Personalization Anchor Quality Rating
312 
313Rate each anchor on a 3-point scale:
314 
315| Rating | Definition | Example |
316|--------|-----------|---------|
317| **Strong** | Specific, recent, and directly relevant to your outreach. Can carry an entire email opener. | Contact posted about the exact problem you solve 2 weeks ago. |
318| **Moderate** | Somewhat specific. Requires a bridge to connect to your outreach. | Contact recently changed jobs (trigger event, but not directly related to your product). |
319| **Weak** | Generic or old. Better than nothing but does not create a compelling hook. | Contact went to a well-known university (common ground, but shallow). |
320 
321**Minimum personalization standard:** Every outreach email must contain at least one Strong or two Moderate anchors. If you can only find Weak anchors, note this as a limitation and recommend additional research.
322 
323---
324 
325## Phase 4: Contact Access Scoring
326 
327### 4.1 Contact Access Score (0-100)
328 
329Calculate across 4 sub-dimensions, each scored 0-25:
330 
331#### Decision Makers Identified (0-25)
332 
333| Criteria | Points |
334|----------|--------|
335| Economic buyer identified by name | +8 |
336| Champion identified by name | +6 |
337| Technical evaluator identified by name | +4 |
338| 3+ buying committee members found | +4 |
339| Full buying committee mapped (all relevant roles) | +3 |
340| Only CEO/founder identified (SMB single-decision) | +10 (replaces above) |
341| No decision makers found | 0 |
342 
343#### Contact Info Accessibility (0-25)
344 
345| Criteria | Points |
346|----------|--------|
347| Email pattern identified | +8 |
348| Direct email found for key contact | +10 |
349| LinkedIn profiles found for key contacts | +5 |
350| Phone number found | +2 |
351| No contact info or social profiles found | 0 |
352 
353#### Personalization Anchor Quality (0-25)
354 
355| Criteria | Points |
356|----------|--------|
357| Strong anchor found for primary target | +10 |
358| Moderate anchors found for 2+ contacts | +8 |
359| Recent trigger event for company | +5 |
360| Personal trigger event for key contact | +5 |
361| Only weak/generic anchors found | +2 |
362| No personalization anchors found | 0 |
363 
364#### Warm Paths Available (0-25)
365 
366| Criteria | Points |
367|----------|--------|
368| Mutual connection who can make introduction | +15 |
369| Shared community or alumni network | +8 |
370| Contact engages with your content/brand | +10 |
371| Contact has used your product/competitor at previous company | +8 |
372| No warm paths identified | 0 |
373 
374**Contact Access Score interpretation:**
375 
376| Score | Interpretation |
377|-------|---------------|
378| 80-100 | Excellent access. Strong personalization hooks and clear path to decision makers. |
379| 60-79 | Good access. Key contacts identified with reasonable personalization options. |
380| 40-59 | Moderate access. Some contacts found but personalization is limited. |
381| 20-39 | Limited access. Few contacts identified. Need creative approaches. |
382| 0-19 | Poor access. Cannot identify decision makers from public data. |
383 
384---
385 
386## Phase 5: Multi-Threading Strategy
387 
388### 5.1 What is Multi-Threading?
389 
390Multi-threading means engaging multiple stakeholders within the prospect organization simultaneously or in sequence. Deals with 3+ contacts engaged are 2-3x more likely to close than single-threaded deals.
391 
392### 5.2 Multi-Threading Approach by Company Size
393 
394| Company Size | Recommended Threads | Approach |
395|-------------|-------------------|----------|
396| **1-20 employees** | 1-2 contacts | Founder/CEO + one other key person. Keep it simple. |
397| **21-100 employees** | 2-3 contacts | Economic buyer + champion + technical evaluator. Stagger outreach by 2-3 days. |
398| **101-500 employees** | 3-4 contacts | Economic buyer + champion + technical evaluator + end user. Use different channels for each. |
399| **500+ employees** | 4-6 contacts | Full buying committee coverage. Assign different messaging angles per role. Coordinate timing. |
400 
401### 5.3 Multi-Threading Sequence
402 
403**Step 1 (Day 0-1): Engage the Champion**
404- Start with the person most likely to feel the pain
405- Use the most personalized message
406- Goal: Get a response and establish a dialogue
407 
408**Step 2 (Day 2-3): Connect with the Economic Buyer**
409- LinkedIn connection request with custom note
410- Separate email thread (not CC'd with champion)
411- Goal: Get on their radar with a strategic message
412 
413**Step 3 (Day 5-7): Engage the Technical Evaluator**
414- Technical content or case study focused
415- Mention integration capabilities and security
416- Goal: Pre-empt technical objections
417 
418**Step 4 (Day 7-10): Warm the End Users**
419- Share a relevant resource or invite to a webinar
420- Focus on daily workflow improvements
421- Goal: Build bottom-up demand
422 
423### 5.4 Coordination Rules
424 
425- Never CC multiple contacts in the same email thread unless they are already in conversation
426- Each contact gets messaging tailored to their role and concerns
427- If one thread goes cold, reference it obliquely in another thread ("Your team has been exploring...")
428- Share different but complementary content with each contact
429- Track all touchpoints in CRM to avoid over-contacting
430 
431---
432 
433## Output Format: DECISION-MAKERS.md
434 
435Write the full output to `DECISION-MAKERS.md` in the current directory:
436 
437```markdown
438# Decision Maker Intelligence: [Company Name]
439**URL:** [url]
440**Date:** [current date]
441**Contact Access Score: [X]/100**
442**Buying Committee Size:** [estimated number of people involved in decision]
443**Email Pattern:** [detected pattern or "Unknown"]
444 
445---
446 
447## Executive Summary
448 
449[2-3 paragraphs summarizing who the key decision makers are,
450the quality of contact access, the recommended engagement approach,
451and the multi-threading strategy. Written for a sales rep
452who needs to know who to contact and in what order.]
453 
454---
455 
456## Buying Committee Map
457 
458| Name | Title | Buying Role | Personalization Anchor | Approach Strategy | Priority |
459|------|-------|-------------|----------------------|-------------------|----------|
460| [name] | [title] | Economic Buyer | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 1 |
461| [name] | [title] | Champion | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 2 |
462| [name] | [title] | Technical Evaluator | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 3 |
463| [name] | [title] | End User | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 4 |
464| [name] | [title] | Potential Blocker | [best anchor] | [1-line strategy] | 5 |
465 
466---
467 
468## Org Chart
469 
470```
471[CEO Name] — [Title]
472├── [Direct Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role])
473│ ├── [Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role])
474│ └── [Report] — [Title]
475├── [Direct Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role])
476│ └── [Report] — [Title] ([Buying Role])
477└── [Direct Report] — [Title]
478```
479 
480---
481 
482## Top 3 Priority Contacts
483 
484### Priority 1: [Name] — [Title]
485 
486| Field | Detail |
487|-------|--------|
488| **Name** | [full name] |
489| **Title** | [current title] |
490| **Buying Role** | [role] |
491| **Tenure** | [how long at company] |
492| **Previous Company** | [most recent previous] |
493| **LinkedIn** | [profile URL or search query] |
494| **Email (estimated)** | [based on pattern] |
495 
496**Personalization Anchors:**
4971. [Strong/Moderate anchor with detail]
4982. [Strong/Moderate anchor with detail]
4993. [Additional anchor]
500 
501**Career Background:**
502[2-3 sentence summary of career trajectory and expertise]
503 
504**Recommended Approach:**
505[2-3 sentence strategy for engaging this person.
506Include channel, messaging angle, and expected response.]
507 
508**Suggested Opening Message:**
509[1-2 sentence personalized opener specific to this person]
510 
511---
512 
513### Priority 2: [Name] — [Title]
514[Same format as Priority 1]
515 
516---
517 
518### Priority 3: [Name] — [Title]
519[Same format as Priority 1]
520 
521---
522 
523## Multi-Threading Strategy
524 
525### Engagement Sequence
526 
527| Day | Contact | Channel | Action | Goal |
528|-----|---------|---------|--------|------|
529| 0 | [Champion name] | LinkedIn | Send connection request with custom note | Get connected |
530| 1 | [Champion name] | Email | Send personalized email #1 | Start conversation |
531| 2 | [Economic Buyer] | LinkedIn | Send connection request with custom note | Get on radar |
532| 3 | [Economic Buyer] | Email | Send strategic email focused on ROI | Plant the seed |
533| 5 | [Technical Eval] | Email | Send technical content / case study | Pre-empt objections |
534| 7 | [Champion name] | Email | Follow up with value-add content | Deepen engagement |
535| 10 | [Economic Buyer] | LinkedIn | Engage with their content | Build familiarity |
536| 14 | [End User] | Email/LinkedIn | Share relevant resource | Build bottom-up demand |
537 
538### Messaging by Role
539 
540| Role | Primary Message | Content to Share | CTA |
541|------|----------------|-----------------|-----|
542| Economic Buyer | ROI and strategic impact | ROI calculator, executive summary | 15-min strategic call |
543| Champion | Solve their daily pain | Product demo video, how-to guide | Quick demo or trial |
544| Technical Evaluator | Integration and security | API docs, security whitepaper, case study | Technical deep dive |
545| End User | Make their job easier | Product tour, quick start guide | Self-serve trial |
546 
547---
548 
549## Contact Access Score: [X]/100
550 
551| Sub-Dimension | Score | Detail |
552|--------------|-------|--------|
553| Decision Makers Identified | [X]/25 | [summary] |
554| Contact Info Accessibility | [X]/25 | [summary] |
555| Personalization Anchor Quality | [X]/25 | [summary] |
556| Warm Paths Available | [X]/25 | [summary] |
557| **TOTAL** | **[X]/100** | |
558 
559---
560 
561## Recommended Outreach Order
562 
5631. **First contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [Why first]
5642. **Second contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [Why second]
5653. **Third contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [Why third]
5664. **Fourth contact:** [Name] ([Role]) — [If applicable]
567 
568---
569 
570*Generated by AI Sales Team — `/sales contacts`*
571```
572 
573---
574 
575## Terminal Output
576 
577Display a condensed summary in the terminal:
578 
579```
580=== DECISION MAKER INTELLIGENCE COMPLETE ===
581 
582Company: [name]
583Buying Committee Size: [X] contacts identified
584 
585Contact Access Score: [X]/100
586 Decision Makers: [XX]/25 ████████░░
587 Contact Info: [XX]/25 ██████░░░░
588 Personalization: [XX]/25 ███████░░░
589 Warm Paths: [XX]/25 █████░░░░░
590 
591Buying Committee:
592 Economic Buyer: [Name], [Title]
593 Champion: [Name], [Title]
594 Technical Eval: [Name], [Title]
595 End User: [Name], [Title]
596 
597Email Pattern: [pattern]
598 
599Recommended First Contact: [Name] ([Role])
600Recommended Channel: [Email/LinkedIn/Both]
601 
602Full report saved to: DECISION-MAKERS.md
603```
604 
605---
606 
607## Error Handling
608 
609- If the team page does not exist or is empty, rely entirely on LinkedIn research and web search
610- If no contacts are found, note this as a critical gap and recommend manual LinkedIn research
611- If the company is very small (1-5 people), adapt the buying committee framework — the founder likely fills most roles
612- If the company is very large (5000+), focus on the specific division or department most relevant to your solution
613- Always produce a report with whatever contacts are found, even if incomplete
614 
615## Cross-Skill Integration
616 
617- If `COMPANY-RESEARCH.md` exists, use leadership data to pre-populate contacts
618- If `LEAD-QUALIFICATION.md` exists, use authority and champion findings
619- If `OUTREACH-SEQUENCE.md` exists, check for alignment with contact strategy
620- Suggest follow-up: `/sales outreach` for full email sequence, `/sales prep` for meeting preparation
621 

Discussion

Alternatives