/cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions
/cs:cto-review <plan> — Architecture and scaling interrogation.
How to use it
Claude Code
- Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into
~/.claude/skills/cto-review. - Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
npx degit alirezarezvani/claude-skills/c-level-agents/skills/cto-review#main ~/.claude/skills/cto-reviewFor one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/cto-review.
Claude (web or desktop app)
- On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
- Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
- Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
- Check the skill is switched on.
- Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
- ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
- Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
- Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
- Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.
Source of /cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions
Show the full text118 lines
| name | description |
|---|---|
| cto-review | /cs:cto-review <plan> — Architecture and scaling interrogation. Tech debt, scaling cliffs, team scaling, build-vs-buy. Use when committing to an architecture, planning for 10x load, or weighing a rebuild against a vendor. |
/cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:cto-review <plan>
Pressure-tests architecture and engineering scaling decisions. Six questions to surface the next scaling cliff before you hit it.
When to Run
- Before approving a major architecture change
- Before doubling the engineering team
- Before a build-vs-buy decision > $100K/year
- When a system is showing reliability stress (SLOs missed)
- Before committing to a new platform / language / DB
The Six CTO Questions
1. Scaling Cliff
Where does the current architecture break, in terms of users / requests / data volume?
- Be specific. "It breaks at 10× current load because the primary DB writes saturate."
- If you don't know, run a load test before deciding.
2. Tech Debt Inventory
What's the top tech debt item, what's it costing per week, and when does it become blocking?
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cto-advisor/scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py
3. Team Scaling
For each open req, what's the ramp time and contribution model?
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cto-advisor/scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py
4. Build vs Buy
Why are we building this instead of buying it — and what's the 3-year TCO of each?
- If "we want control" or "it's not that hard" — push back.
- If the answer is "this is our core moat," build.
5. SLO / Reliability
What are the SLOs for this system and what's the current error budget burn?
- Without an SLO, you can't reason about reliability tradeoffs.
- See
engineering/slo-architectfor SLO design.
6. Security & Compliance Surface
What does this expose, and has cs-ciso-advisor signed off?
- Architecture decisions are compliance decisions.
- Loop in cs-ciso-advisor before commit.
Workflow
- Run the tech debt analyzer + team scaling calculator
- Define the scaling-cliff hypothesis explicitly
- Cross-check with cs-ciso-advisor for security implications
- Apply the verdict
Output Format
# CTO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Scaling Cliff
- Current capacity: <metric>
- Break point: <metric>
- Headroom: X months at current growth
## Tech Debt
- Top item: <description>
- Cost per week: $X or N eng-hours
- Blocking date estimate: <date>
## Team
- Open reqs: N
- Median ramp: X months
- Contribution model: <pairing / squad / area>
## Build vs Buy
- 3-year build TCO: $X
- 3-year buy TCO: $X
- Strategic fit: <core / context>
- Decision: BUILD | BUY
## Reliability
- SLO defined: yes / no
- Error budget burn: X% (target < Y%)
## Security
- cs-ciso sign-off: ✅ / ❌
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
Routing
/cs:ciso-review— mandatory if data surface changes/cs:cfo-review— for build-vs-buy > $100K/cs:execute— quarterly plan/cs:boardroom— for architecture pivots
Related
- Agent:
cs-cto-advisor - Skill:
cto-advisor - SLO:
../../../engineering/slo-architect/
Version: 1.0.0
| 1 | |
| 2 | name "cto-review" |
| 3 | description "/cs:cto-review <plan> — Architecture and scaling interrogation. Tech debt, scaling cliffs, team scaling, build-vs-buy. Use when committing to an architecture, planning for 10x load, or weighing a rebuild against a vendor." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # /cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions |
| 7 | |
| 8 | **Command:** `/cs:cto-review <plan>` |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Pressure-tests architecture and engineering scaling decisions. Six questions to surface the next scaling cliff before you hit it. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ## When to Run |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Before approving a major architecture change |
| 15 | Before doubling the engineering team |
| 16 | Before a build-vs-buy decision > $100K/year |
| 17 | When a system is showing reliability stress (SLOs missed) |
| 18 | Before committing to a new platform / language / DB |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ## The Six CTO Questions |
| 21 | |
| 22 | ### 1. Scaling Cliff |
| 23 | **Where does the current architecture break, in terms of users / requests / data volume?** |
| 24 | Be specific. "It breaks at 10× current load because the primary DB writes saturate." |
| 25 | If you don't know, run a load test before deciding. |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ### 2. Tech Debt Inventory |
| 28 | **What's the top tech debt item, what's it costing per week, and when does it become blocking?** |
| 29 | |
| 30 | python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cto-advisor/scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py |
| 31 | |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ### 3. Team Scaling |
| 34 | **For each open req, what's the ramp time and contribution model?** |
| 35 | |
| 36 | python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cto-advisor/scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | ### 4. Build vs Buy |
| 40 | **Why are we building this instead of buying it — and what's the 3-year TCO of each?** |
| 41 | If "we want control" or "it's not that hard" — push back. |
| 42 | If the answer is "this is our core moat," build. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ### 5. SLO / Reliability |
| 45 | **What are the SLOs for this system and what's the current error budget burn?** |
| 46 | Without an SLO, you can't reason about reliability tradeoffs. |
| 47 | See `engineering/slo-architect` for SLO design. |
| 48 | |
| 49 | ### 6. Security & Compliance Surface |
| 50 | **What does this expose, and has cs-ciso-advisor signed off?** |
| 51 | Architecture decisions are compliance decisions. |
| 52 | Loop in cs-ciso-advisor before commit. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | ## Workflow |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Run the tech debt analyzer + team scaling calculator |
| 57 | Define the scaling-cliff hypothesis explicitly |
| 58 | Cross-check with cs-ciso-advisor for security implications |
| 59 | Apply the verdict |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ## Output Format |
| 62 | |
| 63 | |
| 64 | # CTO Review: <plan> |
| 65 | **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ## Scaling Cliff |
| 68 | - Current capacity: <metric> |
| 69 | - Break point: <metric> |
| 70 | - Headroom: X months at current growth |
| 71 | |
| 72 | ## Tech Debt |
| 73 | - Top item: <description> |
| 74 | - Cost per week: $X or N eng-hours |
| 75 | - Blocking date estimate: <date> |
| 76 | |
| 77 | ## Team |
| 78 | - Open reqs: N |
| 79 | - Median ramp: X months |
| 80 | - Contribution model: <pairing / squad / area> |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ## Build vs Buy |
| 83 | - 3-year build TCO: $X |
| 84 | - 3-year buy TCO: $X |
| 85 | - Strategic fit: <core / context> |
| 86 | - Decision: BUILD | BUY |
| 87 | |
| 88 | ## Reliability |
| 89 | - SLO defined: yes / no |
| 90 | - Error budget burn: X% (target < Y%) |
| 91 | |
| 92 | ## Security |
| 93 | - cs-ciso sign-off: ✅ / ❌ |
| 94 | |
| 95 | ## Verdict |
| 96 | 🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK |
| 97 | |
| 98 | ## Next Steps |
| 99 | [3 concrete actions] |
| 100 | |
| 101 | |
| 102 | ## Routing |
| 103 | |
| 104 | `/cs:ciso-review` — mandatory if data surface changes |
| 105 | `/cs:cfo-review` — for build-vs-buy > $100K |
| 106 | `/cs:execute` — quarterly plan |
| 107 | `/cs:boardroom` — for architecture pivots |
| 108 | |
| 109 | ## Related |
| 110 | |
| 111 | Agent: [`cs-cto-advisor`] |
| 112 | Skill: [`cto-advisor`] |
| 113 | SLO: `../../../engineering/slo-architect/` |
| 114 | |
| 115 | |
| 116 | |
| 117 | **Version:** 1.0.0 |
| 118 |
Discussion
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Development.