Conference strategy skill
Plans a conference program: event selection, sponsorship ROI, speaking (CFP) submissions, booth strategy, and team preparation.
by LeadMagic·MIT license·★ 62 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗
npx degit LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/events/conference-strategy#main ~/.claude/skills/conference-strategyChecked ·commit main
Inside this skill
SKILL.md · the author's own words# Conference Strategy ## Overview Conferences are the single biggest line item in many B2B marketing budgets — and the least measured. This skill covers event selection, sponsorship evaluation, speaking submission strategy, booth design, and team preparation to maximize ROI. ## Authoritative Foundations - **Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall** — Measure events by the pipeline stages they create and accelerate, not by badge scans. - **ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing** — Choose and staff events by target-account attendance, and pre-book meetings with named accounts. - **Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution** — Add a 'How did you hear about us?' field so event influence that never appears in last-tou… ## When to Use - "Plan our conference strategy"
Word-for-word excerpt, not a result. Read the full SKILL.md ↓
Files of Conference strategy
Show the full text172 lines
Conference Strategy
Overview
Conferences are the single biggest line item in many B2B marketing budgets — and the least measured. This skill covers event selection, sponsorship evaluation, speaking submission strategy, booth design, and team preparation to maximize ROI.
Authoritative Foundations
- Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall — Measure events by the pipeline stages they create and accelerate, not by badge scans.
- ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing — Choose and staff events by target-account attendance, and pre-book meetings with named accounts.
- Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution — Add a 'How did you hear about us?' field so event influence that never appears in last-touch reporting is still captured.
When to Use
- "Plan our conference strategy"
- "Which events should we sponsor?"
- "Submit a CFP"
- "Conference ROI analysis"
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Event Selection Matrix
Score events on 5 dimensions (1-10 each):
- ICP concentration (×2): % of attendees matching your ICP. Check past attendee lists, ask peers who attended.
- Decision-maker presence (×1.5): Are buyers there or just practitioners? Practitioner conferences build brand; buyer conferences build pipeline.
- Competitor presence: If 3+ competitors sponsor/speak, you should too. If none, you might pioneer a category — or there's no market.
- Cost per qualified conversation: Total cost / expected qualified meetings. Target: <$500 per qualified meeting for $10K+ ACV products.
- Content/PR value: Speaking slot? Press coverage? Industry credibility?
Score >35: Sponsor/speak. Score 25-35: Attend only. Score <25: Skip.
Phase 2: Sponsorship Evaluation
- Booth: Only worth it if you have 2+ dedicated staff and a lead capture process. Badge-scanning without qualification = waste of money.
- Speaking slot: Highest ROI of any sponsorship. Negotiate it into your package. A 30-min talk is worth more than a 10x10 booth.
- Sponsored happy hour / dinner: High cost, high reward for relationship building. Invite specific target accounts, not open bar for randoms.
- Branding only: Logo on lanyard/tote bag. Low ROI unless you're a household name in the industry. Skip.
Phase 3: Speaking Submissions (CFP)
- Submit to 3-5 events: One talk abstract, customized per event theme
- Talk structure: Problem story → counterintuitive insight → framework → results data → specific takeaways. No product pitch.
- Co-speak with a customer: 3x acceptance rate vs solo. Event organizers love practitioner stories.
- Submit early: CFP deadlines are real. Late submissions are ignored.
- Rehearse: Do a dry run with internal team. Record it. Watch it. Fix it.
Phase 4: Booth Strategy
- Lead capture: Badge scan + 1 qualifier question ("What brings you to [Event]?" → scoring). No generic "tell me about your role."
- Booth staff: Train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry. No phones. No sitting. No eating. 2-hour shifts max (it's exhausting).
- Giveaway strategy: Something useful (charging brick > stress ball). Require badge scan to get it.
- Demo station: 1-2 dedicated demo stations with good chairs. 5-minute targeted demo, not a full product tour.
Phase 5: Post-Event Debrief
Within 48 hours of event end: what worked, what didn't, revenue influenced, cost per meeting. Update event scores for next year's selection.
Output Format
Conference strategy document with: event selection scores, sponsorship package negotiation points, speaking submission abstracts, booth plan, and post-event debrief template.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- All required sections are complete
- Output matches the user's stated need
- Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations
- No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action
- Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual
Common Pitfalls
- No pre-event outreach. Showing up to a conference without booked meetings wastes the investment. Fix: scrape attendee lists, research targets, and book meetings 2-3 weeks before.
- Booth staff without training. Untrained staff give generic demos and fail to qualify. Fix: train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry before the event.
- No post-event follow-up system. Leads go cold within 48 hours. Fix: Day 1 personalized follow-up, Day 3 value-add, Day 7 soft CTA.
Implementation Depth
Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.
Diagnostic Questions
- What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?
- Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?
- What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?
- What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?
- What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?
Framework Application
Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:
- B2B Event ROI Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Conference Strategy Playbook: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Bizzabo — Event Experience Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
Deliverable Standard
A strong output from this skill includes:
- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation
- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list
- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan
- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators
- Risks and edge cases called out before execution
Adaptation Rules
- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.
- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.
- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validator
Related Skills
- event-driven-outreach, field-marketing, pipeline-management, sales-enablement, partnership-strategy
| 1 | |
| 2 | name conference-strategy |
| 3 | description >- |
| 4 | Plans a conference program: event selection, sponsorship ROI, speaking (CFP) |
| 5 | submissions, booth strategy, and team preparation. Use when the user is |
| 6 | choosing which events to attend or sponsor, submitting a CFP, or analyzing |
| 7 | conference ROI. Triggers on: "conference strategy", "event planning", "trade |
| 8 | show strategy", "sponsorship ROI", "CFP submissions". |
| 9 | license MIT |
| 10 | compatibility Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed |
| 11 | metadata |
| 12 | version "1.0.0" |
| 13 | author LeadMagic |
| 14 | category events |
| 15 | tags [events, conferences, event-strategy, sponsorship, speaking] |
| 16 | frameworks |
| 17 | - "Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall" |
| 18 | - "ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing" |
| 19 | - "Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution" |
| 20 | related_skills |
| 21 | [ |
| 22 | event-driven-outreach, |
| 23 | field-marketing, |
| 24 | pipeline-management, |
| 25 | sales-enablement, |
| 26 | partnership-strategy, |
| 27 | ] |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | # Conference Strategy |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ## Overview |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Conferences are the single biggest line item in many B2B marketing budgets — |
| 35 | and the least measured. This skill covers event selection, sponsorship evaluation, |
| 36 | speaking submission strategy, booth design, and team preparation to maximize ROI. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ## Authoritative Foundations |
| 39 | **Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall** — Measure events by the pipeline stages they create and accelerate, not by badge scans. |
| 40 | **ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing** — Choose and staff events by target-account attendance, and pre-book meetings with named accounts. |
| 41 | **Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution** — Add a 'How did you hear about us?' field so event influence that never appears in last-touch reporting is still captured. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | ## When to Use |
| 44 | |
| 45 | "Plan our conference strategy" |
| 46 | "Which events should we sponsor?" |
| 47 | "Submit a CFP" |
| 48 | "Conference ROI analysis" |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ## Step-by-Step Process |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### Phase 1: Event Selection Matrix |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Score events on 5 dimensions (1-10 each): |
| 55 | |
| 56 | **ICP concentration (×2):** % of attendees matching your ICP. |
| 57 | Check past attendee lists, ask peers who attended. |
| 58 | **Decision-maker presence (×1.5):** Are buyers there or just practitioners? |
| 59 | Practitioner conferences build brand; buyer conferences build pipeline. |
| 60 | **Competitor presence:** If 3+ competitors sponsor/speak, you should too. |
| 61 | If none, you might pioneer a category — or there's no market. |
| 62 | **Cost per qualified conversation:** Total cost / expected qualified meetings. |
| 63 | Target: <$500 per qualified meeting for $10K+ ACV products. |
| 64 | **Content/PR value:** Speaking slot? Press coverage? Industry credibility? |
| 65 | |
| 66 | Score >35: Sponsor/speak. Score 25-35: Attend only. Score <25: Skip. |
| 67 | |
| 68 | ### Phase 2: Sponsorship Evaluation |
| 69 | |
| 70 | **Booth:** Only worth it if you have 2+ dedicated staff and a lead capture |
| 71 | process. Badge-scanning without qualification = waste of money. |
| 72 | **Speaking slot:** Highest ROI of any sponsorship. Negotiate it into your |
| 73 | package. A 30-min talk is worth more than a 10x10 booth. |
| 74 | **Sponsored happy hour / dinner:** High cost, high reward for relationship |
| 75 | building. Invite specific target accounts, not open bar for randoms. |
| 76 | **Branding only:** Logo on lanyard/tote bag. Low ROI unless you're a |
| 77 | household name in the industry. Skip. |
| 78 | |
| 79 | ### Phase 3: Speaking Submissions (CFP) |
| 80 | |
| 81 | **Submit to 3-5 events:** One talk abstract, customized per event theme |
| 82 | **Talk structure:** Problem story → counterintuitive insight → framework → |
| 83 | results data → specific takeaways. No product pitch. |
| 84 | **Co-speak with a customer:** 3x acceptance rate vs solo. Event organizers |
| 85 | love practitioner stories. |
| 86 | **Submit early:** CFP deadlines are real. Late submissions are ignored. |
| 87 | **Rehearse:** Do a dry run with internal team. Record it. Watch it. Fix it. |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ### Phase 4: Booth Strategy |
| 90 | |
| 91 | **Lead capture:** Badge scan + 1 qualifier question ("What brings you to |
| 92 | [Event]?" → scoring). No generic "tell me about your role." |
| 93 | **Booth staff:** Train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry. |
| 94 | No phones. No sitting. No eating. 2-hour shifts max (it's exhausting). |
| 95 | **Giveaway strategy:** Something useful (charging brick > stress ball). |
| 96 | Require badge scan to get it. |
| 97 | **Demo station:** 1-2 dedicated demo stations with good chairs. 5-minute |
| 98 | targeted demo, not a full product tour. |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ### Phase 5: Post-Event Debrief |
| 101 | |
| 102 | Within 48 hours of event end: what worked, what didn't, revenue influenced, |
| 103 | cost per meeting. Update event scores for next year's selection. |
| 104 | |
| 105 | ## Output Format |
| 106 | |
| 107 | Conference strategy document with: event selection scores, sponsorship package |
| 108 | negotiation points, speaking submission abstracts, booth plan, and post-event |
| 109 | debrief template. |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ## Quality Check |
| 112 | |
| 113 | Before delivering, verify: |
| 114 | |
| 115 | [ ] All required sections are complete |
| 116 | [ ] Output matches the user's stated need |
| 117 | [ ] Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations |
| 118 | [ ] No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action |
| 119 | [ ] Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual |
| 120 | |
| 121 | ## Common Pitfalls |
| 122 | |
| 123 | **No pre-event outreach.** Showing up to a conference without booked meetings wastes the investment. Fix: scrape attendee lists, research targets, and book meetings 2-3 weeks before. |
| 124 | **Booth staff without training.** Untrained staff give generic demos and fail to qualify. Fix: train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry before the event. |
| 125 | **No post-event follow-up system.** Leads go cold within 48 hours. Fix: Day 1 personalized follow-up, Day 3 value-add, Day 7 soft CTA. |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ## Implementation Depth |
| 128 | |
| 129 | Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation. |
| 130 | |
| 131 | ### Diagnostic Questions |
| 132 | |
| 133 | What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led? |
| 134 | Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed? |
| 135 | What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none? |
| 136 | What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow? |
| 137 | What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure? |
| 138 | |
| 139 | ### Framework Application |
| 140 | |
| 141 | Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill: |
| 142 | |
| 143 | B2B Event ROI Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 144 | Conference Strategy Playbook: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 145 | Bizzabo — Event Experience Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 146 | |
| 147 | ### Deliverable Standard |
| 148 | |
| 149 | A strong output from this skill includes: |
| 150 | |
| 151 | A crisp diagnosis of the current situation |
| 152 | A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list |
| 153 | A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan |
| 154 | A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators |
| 155 | Risks and edge cases called out before execution |
| 156 | |
| 157 | ### Adaptation Rules |
| 158 | |
| 159 | For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity. |
| 160 | For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets. |
| 161 | For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements. |
| 162 | |
| 163 | ## Execution Artifacts |
| 164 | |
| 165 | `references/framework-notes.md` — Named frameworks and reference tables |
| 166 | `templates/output-template.md` — Deliverable shell for agent output |
| 167 | `scripts/check-output.py` — Lightweight deliverable validator |
| 168 | |
| 169 | ## Related Skills |
| 170 | |
| 171 | event-driven-outreach, field-marketing, pipeline-management, sales-enablement, partnership-strategy |
| 172 |
Discussion
Alternatives
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Product.