Competitive Intelligence

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions.

How to use it

Claude Code
  1. Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into ~/.claude/skills/competitive-intel.
  2. Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit alirezarezvani/claude-skills/c-level-advisor/skills/competitive-intel#main ~/.claude/skills/competitive-intel

For one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/competitive-intel.

Claude (web or desktop app)
  1. On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
  2. Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
  3. Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
  4. Check the skill is switched on.
  5. Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
  1. ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
  2. Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
  • Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
  • Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Step-by-step guide with screenshots · Ask in the forum

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Source of Competitive Intelligence

Show the full text204 lines
namedescriptionlicensemetadata
competitive-intelSystematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.MIT version: 1.0.0 author: Alireza Rezvani category: c-level domain: competitive-strategy updated: 2026-03-05 frameworks: ci-playbook, battlecard-template

Competitive Intelligence

Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions.

Keywords

competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy

Quick Start

Ask in natural language for the deliverable you need:

"Map our competitive landscape" — direct, indirect, and future competitors "Build a battlecard for [competitor]" — sales-ready battlecard "Run a win/loss analysis" — recent wins and losses by reason "What did [competitor] do recently?" — competitor update tracking "Build a competitive positioning map" — 2x2 positioning map

Framework: 5-Layer Intelligence System

Layer 1: Competitor Identification

Direct competitors: Same ICP, same problem, comparable solution, similar price point. Indirect competitors: Same budget, different solution (including "do nothing" and "build in-house"). Future competitors: Well-funded startups in adjacent space; large incumbents with stated roadmap overlap.

The 2x2 Threat Matrix:

Same ICP Different ICP
Same problem Direct threat Adjacent (watch)
Different problem Displacement risk Ignore for now

Update this quarterly. Who's moved quadrants?

Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions

Track these 8 dimensions per competitor:

Dimension Sources Cadence
Product moves Changelog, G2/Capterra reviews, Twitter/LinkedIn Monthly
Pricing changes Pricing page, sales call intel, customer feedback Triggered
Funding Crunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedIn Triggered
Hiring signals LinkedIn job postings, Indeed Monthly
Partnerships Press releases, co-marketing Triggered
Customer wins Case studies, review sites, LinkedIn Monthly
Customer losses Win/loss interviews, churned accounts Ongoing
Messaging shifts Homepage, ads (Facebook/Google Ad Library) Quarterly
Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks

SWOT per Competitor:

  • Strengths: What do they do well? Where do they win?
  • Weaknesses: Where do they lose? What do customers complain about?
  • Opportunities: What could they do that would threaten you?
  • Threats: What's their existential risk?

Competitive Positioning Map (2 axis): Choose axes that matter for your buyers:

  • Common: Price vs Feature Depth; Enterprise-ready vs SMB-ready; Easy to implement vs Configurable
  • Pick axes that show YOUR differentiation clearly

Feature Gap Analysis:

Feature You Competitor A Competitor B Gap status
[Feature] ✅ ✅ ❌ Your advantage
[Feature] ❌ ✅ ✅ Gap — roadmap?
[Feature] ✅ ❌ ❌ Moat
[Feature] ❌ ❌ ✅ Competitor B only
Layer 4: Output Formats

For Sales (CRO): Battlecards — one page per competitor, designed for pre-call prep. See templates/battlecard-template.md

For Marketing (CMO): Positioning update — message shifts, new differentiators, claims to stop or start making.

For Product (CPO): Feature gap summary — what customers ask for that we don't have, what competitors ship, what to reprioritize.

For CEO/Board: Monthly competitive summary — 1-page: who moved, what it means, recommended responses.

Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence

Monthly (scheduled):

  • Review all tier-1 competitors (direct threats, top 3)
  • Update battlecards with new intel
  • Publish 1-page summary to leadership

Triggered (event-based):

  • Competitor raises funding → assess implications within 48 hours
  • Competitor launches major feature → product + sales response within 1 week
  • Competitor poaches key customer → win/loss interview within 2 weeks
  • Competitor changes pricing → analyze and respond within 1 week

Quarterly:

  • Full competitive landscape review
  • Update positioning map
  • Refresh ICP competitive threat assessment
  • Add/remove companies from tracking list

Win/Loss Analysis

This is the highest-signal competitive data you have. Most companies do it too rarely.

When to interview:

  • Every lost deal >$50K ACV
  • Every churn >6 months tenure
  • Every competitive win (learn why — it may not be what you think)

Who conducts it:

  • NOT the AE who worked the deal (too close, prospect won't be candid)
  • Customer success, product team, or external researcher

Question structure:

  1. "Walk me through your evaluation process"
  2. "Who else were you considering?"
  3. "What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"
  4. "Where did [our product] fall short?"
  5. "What was the deciding factor?"
  6. "What would have changed your decision?"

Aggregate findings monthly:

  • Win reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Loss reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Competitor win rates (by competitor, by segment)
  • Patterns over time

The Balance: Intelligence Without Obsession

Signs you're over-tracking competitors:

  • Roadmap decisions are primarily driven by "they just shipped X"
  • Team morale drops when competitors fundraise
  • You're shipping features you don't believe in to match their checklist
  • Pricing discussions always start with "well, they charge X"

Signs you're under-tracking:

  • Your AEs get blindsided on calls
  • Prospects know more about competitors than your team does
  • You missed a major product launch until customers told you
  • Your positioning hasn't changed in 12+ months despite market moves

The right posture:

  • Know competitors well enough to win against them
  • Don't let them set your agenda
  • Your roadmap is led by customer problems, informed by competitive gaps

Distributing Intelligence

Audience Format Cadence Owner
AEs + SDRs Updated battlecards in CRM Monthly + triggered CRO
Product Feature gap analysis Quarterly CPO
Marketing Positioning brief Quarterly CMO
Leadership 1-page competitive summary Monthly CEO/COO
Board Competitive landscape slide Quarterly CEO

One source of truth: All competitive intel lives in one place (Notion, Confluence, Salesforce). Avoid Slack-only distribution — it disappears.


Red Flags in Competitive Intelligence

Signal What it means
Competitor's win rate >50% in your core segment Fundamental positioning problem, not sales problem
Same objection from 5+ deals: "competitor has X" Feature gap that's real, not just optics
Competitor hired 10 engineers in your domain Major product investment incoming
Competitor raised >$20M and targets your ICP 12-month runway for them to compete hard
Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor decision You're the "check box" — fix perception or segment

Integration with C-Suite Roles

Intelligence Type Feeds To Output Format
Product moves CPO Roadmap input, feature gap analysis
Pricing changes CRO, CFO Pricing response recommendations
Funding rounds CEO, CFO Strategic positioning update
Hiring signals CHRO, CTO Talent market intelligence
Customer wins/losses CRO, CMO Battlecard updates, positioning shifts
Marketing campaigns CMO Counter-positioning, channel intelligence

References

  • references/ci-playbook.md — OSINT sources, win/loss framework, positioning map construction
  • templates/battlecard-template.md — sales battlecard template
1---
2name: "competitive-intel"
3description: "Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning."
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 version: 1.0.0
7 author: Alireza Rezvani
8 category: c-level
9 domain: competitive-strategy
10 updated: 2026-03-05
11 frameworks: ci-playbook, battlecard-template
12---
13 
14# Competitive Intelligence
15 
16Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions.
17 
18## Keywords
19competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy
20 
21## Quick Start
22 
23Ask in natural language for the deliverable you need:
24 
25> "Map our competitive landscape" — direct, indirect, and future competitors
26> "Build a battlecard for [competitor]" — sales-ready battlecard
27> "Run a win/loss analysis" — recent wins and losses by reason
28> "What did [competitor] do recently?" — competitor update tracking
29> "Build a competitive positioning map" — 2x2 positioning map
30 
31## Framework: 5-Layer Intelligence System
32 
33### Layer 1: Competitor Identification
34 
35**Direct competitors:** Same ICP, same problem, comparable solution, similar price point.
36**Indirect competitors:** Same budget, different solution (including "do nothing" and "build in-house").
37**Future competitors:** Well-funded startups in adjacent space; large incumbents with stated roadmap overlap.
38 
39**The 2x2 Threat Matrix:**
40 
41| | Same ICP | Different ICP |
42|---|---|---|
43| **Same problem** | Direct threat | Adjacent (watch) |
44| **Different problem** | Displacement risk | Ignore for now |
45 
46Update this quarterly. Who's moved quadrants?
47 
48### Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions
49 
50Track these 8 dimensions per competitor:
51 
52| Dimension | Sources | Cadence |
53|-----------|---------|---------|
54| **Product moves** | Changelog, G2/Capterra reviews, Twitter/LinkedIn | Monthly |
55| **Pricing changes** | Pricing page, sales call intel, customer feedback | Triggered |
56| **Funding** | Crunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedIn | Triggered |
57| **Hiring signals** | LinkedIn job postings, Indeed | Monthly |
58| **Partnerships** | Press releases, co-marketing | Triggered |
59| **Customer wins** | Case studies, review sites, LinkedIn | Monthly |
60| **Customer losses** | Win/loss interviews, churned accounts | Ongoing |
61| **Messaging shifts** | Homepage, ads (Facebook/Google Ad Library) | Quarterly |
62 
63### Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks
64 
65**SWOT per Competitor:**
66- Strengths: What do they do well? Where do they win?
67- Weaknesses: Where do they lose? What do customers complain about?
68- Opportunities: What could they do that would threaten you?
69- Threats: What's their existential risk?
70 
71**Competitive Positioning Map (2 axis):**
72Choose axes that matter for your buyers:
73- Common: Price vs Feature Depth; Enterprise-ready vs SMB-ready; Easy to implement vs Configurable
74- Pick axes that show YOUR differentiation clearly
75 
76**Feature Gap Analysis:**
77| Feature | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap status |
78|---------|-----|-------------|-------------|------------|
79| [Feature] | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Your advantage |
80| [Feature] | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Gap — roadmap? |
81| [Feature] | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | Moat |
82| [Feature] | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | Competitor B only |
83 
84### Layer 4: Output Formats
85 
86**For Sales (CRO):** Battlecards — one page per competitor, designed for pre-call prep.
87See `templates/battlecard-template.md`
88 
89**For Marketing (CMO):** Positioning update — message shifts, new differentiators, claims to stop or start making.
90 
91**For Product (CPO):** Feature gap summary — what customers ask for that we don't have, what competitors ship, what to reprioritize.
92 
93**For CEO/Board:** Monthly competitive summary — 1-page: who moved, what it means, recommended responses.
94 
95### Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence
96 
97**Monthly (scheduled):**
98- Review all tier-1 competitors (direct threats, top 3)
99- Update battlecards with new intel
100- Publish 1-page summary to leadership
101 
102**Triggered (event-based):**
103- Competitor raises funding → assess implications within 48 hours
104- Competitor launches major feature → product + sales response within 1 week
105- Competitor poaches key customer → win/loss interview within 2 weeks
106- Competitor changes pricing → analyze and respond within 1 week
107 
108**Quarterly:**
109- Full competitive landscape review
110- Update positioning map
111- Refresh ICP competitive threat assessment
112- Add/remove companies from tracking list
113 
114---
115 
116## Win/Loss Analysis
117 
118This is the highest-signal competitive data you have. Most companies do it too rarely.
119 
120**When to interview:**
121- Every lost deal >$50K ACV
122- Every churn >6 months tenure
123- Every competitive win (learn why — it may not be what you think)
124 
125**Who conducts it:**
126- NOT the AE who worked the deal (too close, prospect won't be candid)
127- Customer success, product team, or external researcher
128 
129**Question structure:**
1301. "Walk me through your evaluation process"
1312. "Who else were you considering?"
1323. "What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"
1334. "Where did [our product] fall short?"
1345. "What was the deciding factor?"
1356. "What would have changed your decision?"
136 
137**Aggregate findings monthly:**
138- Win reasons (rank by frequency)
139- Loss reasons (rank by frequency)
140- Competitor win rates (by competitor, by segment)
141- Patterns over time
142 
143---
144 
145## The Balance: Intelligence Without Obsession
146 
147**Signs you're over-tracking competitors:**
148- Roadmap decisions are primarily driven by "they just shipped X"
149- Team morale drops when competitors fundraise
150- You're shipping features you don't believe in to match their checklist
151- Pricing discussions always start with "well, they charge X"
152 
153**Signs you're under-tracking:**
154- Your AEs get blindsided on calls
155- Prospects know more about competitors than your team does
156- You missed a major product launch until customers told you
157- Your positioning hasn't changed in 12+ months despite market moves
158 
159**The right posture:**
160- Know competitors well enough to win against them
161- Don't let them set your agenda
162- Your roadmap is led by customer problems, informed by competitive gaps
163 
164---
165 
166## Distributing Intelligence
167 
168| Audience | Format | Cadence | Owner |
169|----------|--------|---------|-------|
170| AEs + SDRs | Updated battlecards in CRM | Monthly + triggered | CRO |
171| Product | Feature gap analysis | Quarterly | CPO |
172| Marketing | Positioning brief | Quarterly | CMO |
173| Leadership | 1-page competitive summary | Monthly | CEO/COO |
174| Board | Competitive landscape slide | Quarterly | CEO |
175 
176**One source of truth:** All competitive intel lives in one place (Notion, Confluence, Salesforce). Avoid Slack-only distribution — it disappears.
177 
178---
179 
180## Red Flags in Competitive Intelligence
181 
182| Signal | What it means |
183|--------|---------------|
184| Competitor's win rate >50% in your core segment | Fundamental positioning problem, not sales problem |
185| Same objection from 5+ deals: "competitor has X" | Feature gap that's real, not just optics |
186| Competitor hired 10 engineers in your domain | Major product investment incoming |
187| Competitor raised >$20M and targets your ICP | 12-month runway for them to compete hard |
188| Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor decision | You're the "check box" — fix perception or segment |
189 
190## Integration with C-Suite Roles
191 
192| Intelligence Type | Feeds To | Output Format |
193|------------------|----------|---------------|
194| Product moves | CPO | Roadmap input, feature gap analysis |
195| Pricing changes | CRO, CFO | Pricing response recommendations |
196| Funding rounds | CEO, CFO | Strategic positioning update |
197| Hiring signals | CHRO, CTO | Talent market intelligence |
198| Customer wins/losses | CRO, CMO | Battlecard updates, positioning shifts |
199| Marketing campaigns | CMO | Counter-positioning, channel intelligence |
200 
201## References
202- `references/ci-playbook.md` — OSINT sources, win/loss framework, positioning map construction
203- `templates/battlecard-template.md` — sales battlecard template
204 

Discussion

Alternatives

Also in Competitor researchSee all 277 in Product →
Competitor Comparison & Alternatives PagesTell us your product and a rival you keep losing deals to, and get back a ready-to-publish page that shows why customers should pick you.Business & ops · MITAd angle minerMine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviews, Reddit complaints, support tickets, and competitor ads. Extracts actual pain language, competitor weaknesses, and outcome phrases that real buyers use. Outputs a ranked angle bank with proof quotes and recommended ad formats per angle.Business & ops · MITX audience insightsRead your X (Twitter) audience and niche from real data. Pull a handle's recent tweets (yours or a competitor's) with likes, replies, and views, see which formats and hooks are working, read the repliers on a tweet (X gates likers, so repliers are the signal), and scan a niche query for top tweets. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze my tweets", "what is working on X", "read the replies", "competitor tweets", "who is engaging". Not for writing a tweet (use x-post-writer).Marketing · MITFacebook Audience InsightsRead a Facebook Page and its audience from real data. Pull any Page's public stats (yours or a competitor's): followers, likes, categories, intro, websites. And pull the commenters on a public Page post, since Facebook hides the reactor and liker roster and shows counts only, so commenters are the signal. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze my Page", "competitor Page stats", "who is commenting", "read the comments", "audience insights". Not for writing Page posts (use fb-post-writer).Marketing · MIT