Board Meeting Protocol

Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions.

How to use it

Claude Code
  1. Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into ~/.claude/skills/board-meeting.
  2. Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit alirezarezvani/claude-skills/c-level-advisor/skills/board-meeting#main ~/.claude/skills/board-meeting

For one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/board-meeting.

Claude (web or desktop app)
  1. On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
  2. Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
  3. Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
  4. Check the skill is switched on.
  5. Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
  1. ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
  2. Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
  • Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
  • Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Step-by-step guide with screenshots · Ask in the forum

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Source of Board Meeting Protocol

Show the full text158 lines
namedescriptionlicensemetadata
board-meetingMulti-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.MIT version: 1.0.0 author: Alireza Rezvani category: c-level domain: board-protocol updated: 2026-03-05 frameworks: 6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions

Board Meeting Protocol

Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.

Keywords

board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /cs:boardroom, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives

Invoke

/cs:boardroom [topic] — e.g. /cs:boardroom Should we expand to Spain in Q3?


The 6-Phase Protocol

PHASE 1: Context Gathering
  1. Load ~/.claude/company-context.md
  2. Load Layer 2 approved decisions from ~/.claude/decisions/approved/ (Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)
  3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations
  4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation

Chief of Staff selects relevant roles based on topic (not all 14 every time):

Topic Activate
Market expansion CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO
Product direction CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO
Hiring/org CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO (+ VPE for eng hiring)
Pricing CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO
Technology CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO
Contracts / term sheets / legal exposure GC, CEO, CFO
Data strategy / training-data rights CDO, CAIO, GC, CISO
AI strategy / model selection / AI risk CAIO, CTO, CDO, CFO
Retention / churn / customer success CCO, CRO, CPO
Eng delivery / DORA / team structure VPE, CTO, CHRO, CFO

PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)

No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.

Order: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO → GC → CDO → CAIO → CCO → VPE (activated roles only)

Reasoning techniques: CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data | GC: Risk-Based (clause exposure) | CDO: Decision-Driven (what decision does this data drive) | CAIO: Eval-Demanding (no eval, no ship) | CCO: Retention-Obsessed (GRR over NRR) | VPE: Throughput-First (cycle-time math)

Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):

## [ROLE] — [DATE]

Key points (max 5):
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴

Recommendation: [clear position]
Confidence: High / Medium / Low
Source: [where the data came from]
What would change my mind: [specific condition]

Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.


PHASE 3: Critic Analysis

Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.

Checklist:

  • Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)
  • What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?
  • Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)
  • What risk has nobody mentioned?
  • Which agent operated outside their domain?

PHASE 4: Synthesis

Chief of Staff delivers using the Board Meeting Output format (defined in ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md):

  • Decision Required (one sentence)
  • Perspectives (one line per contributing role)
  • Where They Agree / Where They Disagree
  • Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)
  • Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)
  • Your Call (options if founder disagrees)

PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️

Full stop. Wait for the founder.

⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]

Options: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up

Rules:

  • User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..."
  • 30-min inactivity → auto-close as "pending review"
  • Reopen any time with /cs:boardroom resume

PHASE 6: Decision Extraction

After founder approval:

  • Layer 1: Write full transcript → ~/.claude/decisions/raw/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md
  • Layer 2: Write approved decision record → ~/.claude/decisions/approved/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md and append to the index ~/.claude/decisions/approved/decisions.md
  • Mark rejected proposals [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
  • Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added

Memory Structure

Uses the canonical two-layer decision memory (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md → "Decision Memory (Canonical Layout)"):

~/.claude/decisions/
├── raw/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md        # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)
├── raw/archive/YYYY/               # Raw transcripts after 90 days
├── approved/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md   # Layer 2 — founder-approved records (Phase 1 loads these)
└── approved/decisions.md           # Layer 2 index — append-only

Future meetings load Layer 2 only. Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.

Migration: a legacy memory/board-meetings/ folder may exist from earlier versions; read it for history but write new transcripts and decisions to ~/.claude/decisions/.


Failure Mode Quick Reference

Failure Fix
Groupthink (all agree) Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against"
Analysis paralysis Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence
Bikeshedding Log as async action item; return to main agenda
Role bleed (CFO making product calls) Critic flags; exclude from synthesis
Layer contamination Phase 1 loads ~/.claude/decisions/approved/ only — hard rule

References

  • templates/meeting-agenda.md — agenda format
  • templates/meeting-minutes.md — final output format
  • references/meeting-facilitation.md — conflict handling, timing, failure modes
1---
2name: "board-meeting"
3description: "Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question."
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 version: 1.0.0
7 author: Alireza Rezvani
8 category: c-level
9 domain: board-protocol
10 updated: 2026-03-05
11 frameworks: 6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions
12---
13 
14# Board Meeting Protocol
15 
16Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.
17 
18## Keywords
19board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /cs:boardroom, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives
20 
21## Invoke
22`/cs:boardroom [topic]` — e.g. `/cs:boardroom Should we expand to Spain in Q3?`
23 
24---
25 
26## The 6-Phase Protocol
27 
28### PHASE 1: Context Gathering
291. Load `~/.claude/company-context.md`
302. Load Layer 2 approved decisions from `~/.claude/decisions/approved/` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)**
313. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations
324. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation
33 
34**Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 14 every time):
35| Topic | Activate |
36|-------|----------|
37| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |
38| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |
39| Hiring/org | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO (+ VPE for eng hiring) |
40| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |
41| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |
42| Contracts / term sheets / legal exposure | GC, CEO, CFO |
43| Data strategy / training-data rights | CDO, CAIO, GC, CISO |
44| AI strategy / model selection / AI risk | CAIO, CTO, CDO, CFO |
45| Retention / churn / customer success | CCO, CRO, CPO |
46| Eng delivery / DORA / team structure | VPE, CTO, CHRO, CFO |
47 
48---
49 
50### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)
51 
52**No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.**
53 
54Order: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO → GC → CDO → CAIO → CCO → VPE (activated roles only)
55 
56**Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data | GC: Risk-Based (clause exposure) | CDO: Decision-Driven (what decision does this data drive) | CAIO: Eval-Demanding (no eval, no ship) | CCO: Retention-Obsessed (GRR over NRR) | VPE: Throughput-First (cycle-time math)
57 
58**Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):**
59```
60## [ROLE] — [DATE]
61 
62Key points (max 5):
63• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
64• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
65 
66Recommendation: [clear position]
67Confidence: High / Medium / Low
68Source: [where the data came from]
69What would change my mind: [specific condition]
70```
71 
72Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.
73 
74---
75 
76### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis
77Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.
78 
79Checklist:
80- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)
81- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?
82- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)
83- What risk has nobody mentioned?
84- Which agent operated outside their domain?
85 
86---
87 
88### PHASE 4: Synthesis
89Chief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `../agent-protocol/SKILL.md`):
90- Decision Required (one sentence)
91- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)
92- Where They Agree / Where They Disagree
93- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)
94- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)
95- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)
96 
97---
98 
99### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️
100 
101**Full stop. Wait for the founder.**
102 
103```
104⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]
105 
106Options: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up
107```
108 
109**Rules:**
110- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..."
111- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as "pending review"
112- Reopen any time with `/cs:boardroom resume`
113 
114---
115 
116### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction
117After founder approval:
118- **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `~/.claude/decisions/raw/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`
119- **Layer 2:** Write approved decision record → `~/.claude/decisions/approved/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md` and append to the index `~/.claude/decisions/approved/decisions.md`
120- Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]`
121- Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added
122 
123---
124 
125## Memory Structure
126 
127Uses the canonical two-layer decision memory (see `../agent-protocol/SKILL.md` → "Decision Memory (Canonical Layout)"):
128 
129```
130~/.claude/decisions/
131├── raw/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)
132├── raw/archive/YYYY/ # Raw transcripts after 90 days
133├── approved/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md # Layer 2 — founder-approved records (Phase 1 loads these)
134└── approved/decisions.md # Layer 2 index — append-only
135```
136 
137**Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.
138 
139Migration: a legacy `memory/board-meetings/` folder may exist from earlier versions; read it for history but write new transcripts and decisions to `~/.claude/decisions/`.
140 
141---
142 
143## Failure Mode Quick Reference
144| Failure | Fix |
145|---------|-----|
146| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against" |
147| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |
148| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |
149| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |
150| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads `~/.claude/decisions/approved/` only — hard rule |
151 
152---
153 
154## References
155- `templates/meeting-agenda.md` — agenda format
156- `templates/meeting-minutes.md` — final output format
157- `references/meeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes
158 

Discussion