Blue Ocean Strategy Framework
Unverified●25/40Claude Code◐PartialHas SKILL.md but declares no allowed-tools — Claude Code will ask for permission each time
Cursor◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Cursor rules file
Codex◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no AGENTS.md
Gemini CLI◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in
Copilot◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Copilot instructions file
npx agentalley add blue-ocean-strategyWho is stuck, and on what
Everyone in my market sells the same thing and we all fight on price, so my margins keep shrinking. I don't know how to be different without spending a fortune.
What it gives you
A written strategy showing what to stop offering, what to add, and which overlooked customers to go after so you stop competing on price.
When NOT to use it
It will not build the product, run your ads, or make the changes for you — it gives you the plan, not the execution.
The whole source
Frontmatter — 4 properties
| name | blue-ocean-strategy |
|---|---|
| description | Create uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | author: wondelai version: "1.4.1 |
| 1 | --- |
| 2 | name: blue-ocean-strategy |
| 3 | description: 'Create uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome.'B1 — Line is 706 characters — unreadable by eye |
| 4 | license: MIT |
| 5 | metadata: |
| 6 | author: wondelai |
| 7 | version: "1.4.1" |
| 8 | ---A5 — No allowed-tools declared — no way to tell what this skill may touch |
| 9 | |
| 10 | # Blue Ocean Strategy Framework |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Strategic framework for creating uncontested market space that makes the competition irrelevant, based on the simultaneous pursuit of differentiation and low cost. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | ## Core Principle |
| 15 | |
| 16 | **Don't compete in bloody red oceans. Create blue oceans of uncontested market space.** Most companies fight for share in existing industries; winners create new market space where competition is irrelevant by delivering a leap in value for both buyers and themselves. Competition-based strategy is zero-sum — value innovation creates new demand and breaks the value-cost trade-off. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## Scoring |
| 19 | |
| 20 | **Goal: 10/10.** Score a strategy by how many of the five Quick Diagnostic rows it satisfies, mapped to the bands below: |
| 21 | |
| 22 | - **9-10** — divergent strategy-canvas curve, eliminates AND creates factors, breaks the value-cost trade-off, converts non-customers, and delivers a 10x utility leap (all 5 rows). |
| 23 | - **7-8** — value innovation is real but one gate is weak (e.g. strong divergence and cost cuts, but still chasing existing customers rather than non-customers). |
| 24 | - **5-6** — differentiation without cost cuts, or cost cuts without a value leap: better than rivals on the same factors, not yet value innovation (2-3 rows). |
| 25 | - **<=3** — competes on the same factors as rivals with a look-alike canvas curve: a red ocean (0-1 rows). |
| 26 | |
| 27 | Report the current score, which diagnostic rows fail, and the specific ERRC/Six-Paths moves needed to reach 10/10. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ## Framework |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ### 1. Red Ocean vs. Blue Ocean |
| 32 | |
| 33 | **Core concept:** Red oceans are existing market spaces where rivals fight over shrinking profits; blue oceans are new market spaces where the competition is irrelevant. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | | Red Ocean Strategy | Blue Ocean Strategy | |
| 36 | |-------------------|---------------------| |
| 37 | | Compete in existing market space | Create uncontested market space | |
| 38 | | Beat the competition | Make competition irrelevant | |
| 39 | | Exploit existing demand | Create and capture new demand | |
| 40 | | Make the value-cost trade-off | Break the value-cost trade-off | |
| 41 | | Align with differentiation OR low cost | Pursue differentiation AND low cost | |
| 42 | |
| 43 | **Examples:** Airlines competing on routes, amenities, and price are red ocean; Cirque du Soleil inventing a new entertainment form, Netflix replacing rental with streaming, and Nintendo Wii trading graphics power for accessible motion gaming are blue. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | See [references/blue-ocean-examples.md](references/blue-ocean-examples.md) when you want a full worked case to model a move on — Cirque du Soleil, Netflix, Yellow Tail, and Nintendo Wii broken down factor by factor. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | ### 2. Value Innovation |
| 48 | |
| 49 | **Core concept:** The cornerstone of blue ocean strategy — pursue differentiation and low cost simultaneously, creating a leap in value for buyers and the company. Eliminating and reducing over-served factors cuts cost at the same time raising and creating factors lifts buyer value, so value rises faster than cost and the trade-off competitors assume is fixed breaks. |
| 50 | |
| 51 | | Traditional View | Value Innovation View | |
| 52 | |-----------------|---------------------| |
| 53 | | High value = high cost | High value CAN = low cost | |
| 54 | | Differentiate OR cut costs | Differentiate AND cut costs | |
| 55 | | Better performance on established factors | New factors; eliminate old factors | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | **Example — Cirque du Soleil:** eliminated animal shows, star performers, multiple arenas (cost down); reduced thrill and humor; raised venue quality, artistic music and dance; created theme, refined environment, multiple productions. Outcome: priced above circus, costs below theater, a new market. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | See [references/value-innovation.md](references/value-innovation.md) when testing whether an idea is genuine value innovation — the Utility x Price x Cost formula with all three terms and the test questions for each. |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ### 3. Strategy Canvas |
| 62 | |
| 63 | **Core concept:** The diagnostic tool — plot the factors an industry competes on against the offering level for you and competitors. Red oceans show everyone's curve looking the same; a divergent curve signals a blue ocean. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | **How to use:** |
| 66 | 1. List the industry's competing factors (wine: price, prestige, aging quality, vineyard legacy, complexity, range, marketing) |
| 67 | 2. Plot your curve and competitors' — expect near-identical curves in a red ocean |
| 68 | 3. Ask: which factors do buyers not actually care about? What could be eliminated, reduced, raised, or created? Where does the buyer experience hurt? |
| 69 | |
| 70 | **Example — Yellow Tail wine:** |
| 71 | |
| 72 | | Factor | Industry Average | Yellow Tail | |
| 73 | |--------|-----------------|-------------| |
| 74 | | Price, prestige, aging quality | Medium-High | LOW | |
| 75 | | Vineyard legacy, complexity, range | High | LOW | |
| 76 | | Easy drinking | Low | HIGH | |
| 77 | | Fun/adventure, accessibility | Low | HIGH | |
| 78 | |
| 79 | **Result:** A different curve = blue ocean. |
| 80 | |
| 81 | See [references/strategy-canvas.md](references/strategy-canvas.md) when plotting your own canvas — a blank template and step-by-step build instructions. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | ### 4. Four Actions Framework (ERRC Grid) |
| 84 | |
| 85 | **Core concept:** Four questions that reconstruct buyer value — Eliminate and Reduce cut costs; Raise and Create lift value. |
| 86 | |
| 87 | | Action | Question | Examples | Effect | |
| 88 | |--------|----------|----------|--------| |
| 89 | | **Eliminate** | Which taken-for-granted factors add no buyer value? | Cirque: animals, stars; Southwest: meals, seat assignments; IKEA: sales staff, assembly | Cost down; friction removed | |
| 90 | | **Reduce** | What can go well below industry standard? | Yellow Tail: prestige, complexity; Salesforce v1: customization | Cost down; over-serving stops | |
| 91 | | **Raise** | What should go well above industry standard? | Cirque: artistic value; Dyson: suction, design; Apple: UX | Value up; hard to match | |
| 92 | | **Create** | What has the industry never offered? | Netflix: unlimited streaming, no late fees; Uber: live tracking, cashless payment | New demand; attracts non-customers | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | **Ethical boundary:** Don't eliminate factors buyers truly value (especially safety or accessibility) — test assumptions before cutting. |
| 95 | |
| 96 | See [references/errc-grid.md](references/errc-grid.md) when running the exercise with a team — a 3.5-hour workshop format, validation checklists, and fresh ERRC matrices for Zoom, IKEA, MinuteClinic, and Khan Academy. |
| 97 | |
| 98 | ### 5. Six Paths Framework |
| 99 | |
| 100 | **Core concept:** Six systematic ways to look beyond existing industry boundaries and spot blue ocean opportunities. |
| 101 | |
| 102 | | Path | Look across | Example | How to apply | |
| 103 | |------|-------------|---------|--------------| |
| 104 | | **1. Alternative industries** | Different forms solving the same need | NetJets: alternative to both airlines and jet ownership | Map alternatives → find unmet needs across them | |
| 105 | | **2. Strategic groups** | Clusters pursuing similar strategies | Lexus: luxury at accessible price | Find over/under-served needs → position between groups | |
| 106 | | **3. Chain of buyers** | Purchasers vs. users vs. influencers | Novo Nordisk insulin pens: shifted focus from doctors to patients; Bloomberg: traders, not IT purchasers | Identify every buyer in the chain → serve the overlooked one | |
| 107 | | **4. Complementary offerings** | What happens before, during, after use | Babysitting complements movies → "date night" packages | Map the total experience → bundle away pain points | |
| 108 | | **5. Functional ↔ emotional appeal** | Flip the industry's basis of appeal | Swatch: watches as fashion; The Body Shop: cosmetics as ethics | Identify current appeal → build the hybrid | |
| 109 | | **6. Time** | Irreversible trends | iPod/iTunes anticipating digital music; Tesla on EVs | Project the trend's endpoint → build for it today | |
| 110 | |
| 111 | See [references/six-paths.md](references/six-paths.md) when hunting for opportunities path by path — the prompting questions and a worked example for each of the six. |
| 112 | |
| 113 | ### 6. Three Tiers of Non-Customers |
| 114 | |
| 115 | **Core concept:** Blue oceans are created by converting non-customers, not by stealing competitors' customers — non-customers reveal the demand the industry is leaving on the table. |
| 116 | |
| 117 | | Tier | Who they are | Opportunity | Example | |
| 118 | |------|--------------|-------------|---------| |
| 119 | | **1. Soon-to-be** | Edge of your market, minimally using, ready to jump ship | Small shifts win them over | Pret A Manger: professionals who wanted fast AND healthy | |
| 120 | | **2. Refusing** | Considered the industry and consciously rejected it | Remove the barrier behind the refusal | JCDecaux: cities refused outdoor ads until bus shelters came free | |
| 121 | | **3. Unexplored** | Distant markets that never considered you an option | Reframe the offering for their needs | Callaway Big Bertha: beginners and occasional golfers | |
| 122 | |
| 123 | **Process:** map all three tiers → find commonalities across tiers → identify what would unlock massive demand → build the offering to convert them. |
| 124 | |
| 125 | See [references/non-customers.md](references/non-customers.md) when sizing latent demand — how to map each of the three tiers and find the commonalities that unlock them. |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ### 7. Strategic Sequence: Utility → Price → Cost → Adoption |
| 128 | |
| 129 | **Core concept:** Validate a blue ocean idea in strict order — exceptional buyer utility first, then accessible price, then profitable cost, then adoption hurdles. Failing any gate means rework before proceeding. |
| 130 | |
| 131 | | Step | Question | How | |
| 132 | |------|----------|-----| |
| 133 | | **1. Buyer utility** | Is there exceptional utility? | Check six levers (productivity, simplicity, convenience, risk reduction, fun/image, environmental friendliness) across the buyer experience cycle (purchase → delivery → use → supplements → maintenance → disposal); solve the biggest blocks | |
| 134 | | **2. Strategic price** | Is it accessible to the mass of buyers? | Price against alternatives in other forms, not your costs or direct competitors — Cirque priced above circus, below theater | |
| 135 | | **3. Target cost** | Can we profit at that price? | Strategic price − target margin = target cost; hit it via ERRC and partnering — never by sacrificing utility, never "later" | |
| 136 | | **4. Adoption** | Who will resist — employees, partners, public, regulators? | Surface hurdles upfront: educate stakeholders, run pilots, engage partners early | |
| 137 | |
| 138 | **Ethical boundary:** Win adoption by genuinely addressing stakeholder concerns, not by steamrolling the employees and partners who bear the costs of the shift. |
| 139 | |
| 140 | See [references/sequence.md](references/sequence.md) when validating an idea gate by gate — the buyer-utility map, strategic-pricing corridor, and target-costing worksheet. See [references/implementation.md](references/implementation.md) when moving from idea to rollout — overcoming the four organizational hurdles and aligning the team behind the shift. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | ## Common Mistakes |
| 143 | |
| 144 | | Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix | |
| 145 | |---------|-------------|------| |
| 146 | | **Competing on the same factors** | Stuck in the red ocean | Use ERRC to eliminate and create factors | |
| 147 | | **Differentiation without cost focus** | Not value innovation | Eliminate/reduce while raising/creating | |
| 148 | | **Incrementalism** | No leap in value | Aim for 10x improvement on key factors | |
| 149 | | **Imitating competitors** | Red ocean thinking | Look across the six paths for alternatives | |
| 150 | | **Ignoring adoption** | Great idea, no execution | Plan for adoption hurdles upfront | |
| 151 | |
| 152 | ## Quick Diagnostic |
| 153 | |
| 154 | | Question | If No | Action | |
| 155 | |----------|-------|--------| |
| 156 | | Does the Strategy Canvas show a different curve? | Still in the red ocean | Apply the ERRC framework | |
| 157 | | Are we eliminating AND creating? | Not value innovation | Use all four actions | |
| 158 | | Are we breaking the value-cost trade-off? | Traditional competition | Identify over-served factors to cut | |
| 159 | | Are we converting non-customers? | Fighting for existing share | Map the three tiers of non-customers | |
| 160 | | Is there a leap in buyer utility? | Incremental improvement | Aim for 10x on key utility levers | |
| 161 | |
| 162 | ## Further Reading |
| 163 | |
| 164 | Based on Blue Ocean Strategy by W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne: |
| 165 | |
| 166 | - [*"Blue Ocean Strategy"*](https://www.amazon.com/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Expanded-Uncontested/dp/1625274491?tag=wondelai00-20) by W. Chan Kim & Renée Mauborgne (Expanded Edition) |
| 167 | - [*"Blue Ocean Shift"*](https://www.amazon.com/Blue-Ocean-Shift-Competing-Confidence/dp/0316314048?tag=wondelai00-20) by W. Chan Kim & Renée Mauborgne (practical guide to making the shift) |
| 168 | |
| 169 | ## About the Authors |
| 170 | |
| 171 | **W. Chan Kim** and **Renée Mauborgne** are professors of strategy at INSEAD and co-directors of the INSEAD Blue Ocean Strategy Institute. *Blue Ocean Strategy* has sold over 4 million copies in 46 languages, making it one of the best-selling business books of all time. |
| 172 |
Reviews
Installed this one?Write the first review and take the Trailblazer badge.
Alternatives
Structure Your Invention For A Patent FilingDescribe your invention in plain words and get back a formal write-up that lays out the problem it solves, how it works, and which parts are worth protecting.●····●37/40Claims Drafting: The Core Patent SkillDescribe your invention in plain words and get back a numbered set of formal patent claims — the legal wording that defines exactly what you own.●····●36/40Patent Novelty and Non-Obviousness CheckDescribe your invention in everyday words and get back a clear read on whether it's new and original enough to patent, plus where it might hit trouble.●····●35/40Patent Pipeline: From Invention to FilingDescribe your invention in plain words and get back a complete first-draft patent application — claims, full description, and abstract — ready to hand to a patent attorney.●····●35/40