New: Earn 20% as an AgentAlley affiliate. Share your link and earn on every sale you refer. Join now New: Earn 20% as an affiliate. Join now

Research a specific competitor across their website, reviews

Battlecard generator

by gooseworks-ai · MIT license · ★ 1,220 on GitHub · updated Sep 21

Battlecard generator cover

Research a specific competitor across their website, reviews, ads, social presence, and pricing — then produce a structured sales battlecard with positioning traps, objection handlers, landmine questions, and win/loss themes. Chains web…

---
name: battlecard-generator
description: >
  Research a specific competitor across their website, reviews, ads, social presence,
  and pricing — then produce a structured sales battlecard with positioning traps,
  objection handlers, landmine questions, and win/loss themes. Chains web research,
  review mining, and ad intelligence. Use when sales needs competitive ammo or when
  entering a new market with established incumbents.
tags: [competitive-intel]
---

# Battlecard Generator

Research a competitor from every public angle — website, reviews, ads, social, pricing — and produce a structured sales battlecard. The output is what a rep opens 5 minutes before a competitive deal.

**Built for:** PMMs building competitive programs without a dedicated competitive intel team. The battlecard should be opinionated, not a neutral feature comparison.

## When to Use

Overview

Research a competitor from every public angle — website, reviews, ads, social, pricing — and produce a structured sales battlecard. The output is what a rep opens 5 minutes before a competitive deal.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill battlecard-generator -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (manual)mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills/tar.gz/615c685f34f8 \ | tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=4 goose-skills-615c685f34f8/skills/competitive-intel/composites/battlecard-generator
Windows (PowerShell)New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/6403037a246fde56692c/battlecard-generator.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\battlecard-generator.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\battlecard-generator.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -Force
Claude.ai / desktopDownload the ZIP and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB
  • skill.meta.json349 B
Read the files here
gooseworks-ai/615c6852 files
SKILL.md
Show the full text294 lines

Battlecard Generator

Research a competitor from every public angle — website, reviews, ads, social, pricing — and produce a structured sales battlecard. The output is what a rep opens 5 minutes before a competitive deal.

Built for: PMMs building competitive programs without a dedicated competitive intel team. The battlecard should be opinionated, not a neutral feature comparison.

When to Use

  • "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
  • "We keep losing deals to [competitor] — help me understand why"
  • "What are [competitor]'s weaknesses we can exploit?"
  • "Prep the sales team for competitive deals against [competitor]"
  • "Research [competitor] and give me competitive positioning"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product name + URL
  2. Competitor name + URL — One competitor per battlecard (focused > broad)
  3. Deal context — Where do you compete? (same ICP, upmarket/downmarket, different use case?)
  4. Known win/loss signals — Any patterns from deals you've won or lost against them?
  5. Sales team size — Are reps technical or business-focused? (affects language level)
  6. Existing positioning — Your one-line positioning vs this competitor (if any)

Phase 1: Competitor Research

1A: Website & Messaging Analysis
Fetch: [competitor] homepage, pricing page, about page, product page
Search: "[competitor]" "we help" OR "the only" OR "unlike"
Search: "[competitor]" case study OR customer story

Extract:

  • Hero claim — their primary positioning
  • Category — what category do they place themselves in?
  • Target audience — who do they say they serve?
  • Key features emphasized — what do they lead with?
  • Social proof — customer logos, metrics, quotes
  • Pricing structure — plans, pricing model, enterprise vs self-serve
1B: Review Intelligence
Search: "[competitor]" site:g2.com OR site:capterra.com
Search: "[competitor]" reviews "switched from" OR "moved to"

From reviews, extract:

  • Top 5 praised features (their moat — don't compete here directly)
  • Top 5 complaints (your attack angles)
  • Switching signals — why do customers leave?
  • ICP patterns — what roles/company sizes review them?
1C: Ad & Content Analysis
Search: "[competitor]" advertisement OR sponsored
Search: "[competitor]" vs OR alternative OR compare

Extract:

  • Ad messaging — what claims do they pay to promote?
  • Comparison pages — have they published "us vs X" pages?
  • Content themes — what topics do they create content around?
1D: Social & Community Signals
Search: "[competitor]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com complaints OR issues
Search: "[competitor]" "looking for alternative" OR "anyone use"

Extract:

  • Common frustrations discussed publicly
  • Feature requests their users are vocal about
  • Sentiment patterns — do users love or tolerate them?
1E: Pricing Deep Dive
Fetch: [competitor] pricing page
Search: "[competitor]" pricing OR cost OR "how much"

Map their pricing:

  • Model: Per seat / usage-based / flat rate / hybrid
  • Tiers: What's in each tier?
  • Free tier: What's included? What's gated?
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing? What triggers enterprise sales?
  • Hidden costs: Implementation, overages, add-ons?

Phase 2: Competitive Analysis

Strengths & Weaknesses Matrix
Dimension Them Us Net
[Feature area 1] [Rating + context] [Rating + context] Win/Lose/Tie
[Feature area 2] ... ... ...
Pricing ... ... ...
Ease of use ... ... ...
Support ... ... ...
Integrations ... ... ...
Where We Win (lead with these)
  1. [Strength] — [Evidence from research]
  2. [Strength] — [Evidence]
  3. [Strength] — [Evidence]
Where We Lose (don't engage here)
  1. [Weakness] — [Mitigation strategy]
  2. [Weakness] — [How to reframe]
Where It's Close (differentiate on narrative)
  1. [Area] — [How to position the tie as a win]

Phase 3: Output — Battlecard

# Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor]
Last updated: [DATE] | Confidence: [High/Medium — based on data freshness]

---

## Quick Reference (The 30-Second Version)

**They say:** "[Their positioning headline]"
**We say:** "[Our counter-positioning]"
**We win when:** [Deal profile where we have advantage]
**We lose when:** [Deal profile where they have advantage]
**Best opening move:** "[Question or statement to frame the deal]"

---

## Competitor Overview

| | [Competitor] |
|---|---|
| **Founded** | [Year] |
| **Funding** | [Amount / stage] |
| **Headcount** | [Estimate] |
| **Target market** | [Who they serve] |
| **Pricing** | [Model + range] |
| **Category** | [How they position] |

---

## Positioning Traps

Questions to ask early in the deal that frame the evaluation in your favor:

1. **"[Question that highlights your strength]"**
   → If they say [X], you win because [reason]
   → If they say [Y], pivot to [angle]

2. **"[Question that exposes competitor weakness]"**
   → Their answer will likely be [X], which reveals [limitation]

3. **"[Question about a capability they lack]"**
   → They can't do this. When the prospect asks them, it plants doubt.

---

## Landmine Questions

Drop these casually — they'll come up when the prospect evaluates the competitor:

- "Have you asked [competitor] about [specific limitation]?"
- "When you evaluate [competitor], make sure to test [area where they're weak]."
- "One thing worth checking: [competitor] pricing can get expensive once you [usage trigger]."

---

## Objection Handling

### "Why shouldn't we just go with [Competitor]?"
> "[Direct response — acknowledge their strength, pivot to your differentiation]"

### "[Competitor] has more features / is more established"
> "[Response — focus on what matters for this buyer's use case, not feature count]"

### "[Competitor] is cheaper"
> "[Response — reframe on total cost, hidden costs, or value per dollar]"

### "[Competitor] has [big customer logo]"
> "[Response — your relevant social proof + why logo != fit]"

### "We're already using [Competitor]"
> "[Response — switching cost vs cost of staying, what's changed]"

---

## Feature Comparison (Honest Assessment)

| Capability | Us | [Competitor] | Verdict |
|-----------|-----|-------------|---------|
| [Feature 1] | [Status + context] | [Status + context] | [Who wins + why] |
| [Feature 2] | ... | ... | ... |
| [Feature 3] | ... | ... | ... |
| Pricing transparency | ... | ... | ... |
| Onboarding speed | ... | ... | ... |
| Support quality | ... | ... | ... |

---

## Their Customers Say (From Reviews)

### What they love (don't fight these):
- "[Quote from review]" — [Platform, Role]
- "[Quote]" — ...

### What they hate (exploit these):
- "[Quote from negative review]" — [Platform, Role]
- "[Quote]" — ...
- "[Quote]" — ...

---

## Pricing Comparison

| | Us | [Competitor] |
|---|---|---|
| **Entry price** | [$/mo] | [$/mo] |
| **Mid-tier** | [$/mo] | [$/mo] |
| **Enterprise** | [Custom / $X] | [Custom / $X] |
| **Free tier** | [What's included] | [What's included] |
| **Hidden costs** | [None / list] | [Implementation, overages, etc.] |

**Pricing attack angle:** [How to frame pricing comparison favorably]

---

## Win Themes (What Wins Deals)

Based on competitive patterns:
1. **[Theme]** — "[Proof point or quote]"
2. **[Theme]** — ...
3. **[Theme]** — ...

## Loss Themes (What Loses Deals)

Be aware — we tend to lose when:
1. **[Pattern]** — Mitigation: [strategy]
2. **[Pattern]** — Mitigation: [strategy]

---

## Quick Responses for Email/Chat

**When prospect mentions [competitor]:**
> "[2-sentence response for email or Slack]"

**When asked for a comparison:**
> "[3-sentence elevator pitch vs competitor]"

Save to clients/<client-name>/product-marketing/battlecards/vs-[competitor-slug]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.

Cost

Component Cost
Web research Free
Review mining (optional, via review-site-scraper) ~$0.50-1.00
Ad analysis (optional, via ad scrapers) ~$0.50-1.00
All analysis and battlecard generation Free (LLM reasoning)
Total Free — $2

Tools Required

  • web_search — for competitor research
  • fetch_webpage — for site analysis
  • Optional: review-site-scraper for G2/Capterra mining
  • Optional: google-ad-scraper for ad intelligence, web_search against Meta Ad Library for Meta ads

Trigger Phrases

  • "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
  • "Competitive intel on [competitor]"
  • "Run the battlecard generator for [competitor]"
  • "Help me win deals against [competitor]"
1---
2name: battlecard-generator
3description: >
4 Research a specific competitor across their website, reviews, ads, social presence,
5 and pricing — then produce a structured sales battlecard with positioning traps,
6 objection handlers, landmine questions, and win/loss themes. Chains web research,
7 review mining, and ad intelligence. Use when sales needs competitive ammo or when
8 entering a new market with established incumbents.
9tags: [competitive-intel]
10---
11 
12# Battlecard Generator
13 
14Research a competitor from every public angle — website, reviews, ads, social, pricing — and produce a structured sales battlecard. The output is what a rep opens 5 minutes before a competitive deal.
15 
16**Built for:** PMMs building competitive programs without a dedicated competitive intel team. The battlecard should be opinionated, not a neutral feature comparison.
17 
18## When to Use
19 
20- "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
21- "We keep losing deals to [competitor] — help me understand why"
22- "What are [competitor]'s weaknesses we can exploit?"
23- "Prep the sales team for competitive deals against [competitor]"
24- "Research [competitor] and give me competitive positioning"
25 
26## Phase 0: Intake
27 
281. **Your product name + URL**
292. **Competitor name + URL** — One competitor per battlecard (focused > broad)
303. **Deal context** — Where do you compete? (same ICP, upmarket/downmarket, different use case?)
314. **Known win/loss signals** — Any patterns from deals you've won or lost against them?
325. **Sales team size** — Are reps technical or business-focused? (affects language level)
336. **Existing positioning** — Your one-line positioning vs this competitor (if any)
34 
35## Phase 1: Competitor Research
36 
37### 1A: Website & Messaging Analysis
38 
39```
40Fetch: [competitor] homepage, pricing page, about page, product page
41Search: "[competitor]" "we help" OR "the only" OR "unlike"
42Search: "[competitor]" case study OR customer story
43```
44 
45Extract:
46- **Hero claim** — their primary positioning
47- **Category** — what category do they place themselves in?
48- **Target audience** — who do they say they serve?
49- **Key features emphasized** — what do they lead with?
50- **Social proof** — customer logos, metrics, quotes
51- **Pricing structure** — plans, pricing model, enterprise vs self-serve
52 
53### 1B: Review Intelligence
54 
55```
56Search: "[competitor]" site:g2.com OR site:capterra.com
57Search: "[competitor]" reviews "switched from" OR "moved to"
58```
59 
60From reviews, extract:
61- **Top 5 praised features** (their moat — don't compete here directly)
62- **Top 5 complaints** (your attack angles)
63- **Switching signals** — why do customers leave?
64- **ICP patterns** — what roles/company sizes review them?
65 
66### 1C: Ad & Content Analysis
67 
68```
69Search: "[competitor]" advertisement OR sponsored
70Search: "[competitor]" vs OR alternative OR compare
71```
72 
73Extract:
74- **Ad messaging** — what claims do they pay to promote?
75- **Comparison pages** — have they published "us vs X" pages?
76- **Content themes** — what topics do they create content around?
77 
78### 1D: Social & Community Signals
79 
80```
81Search: "[competitor]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com complaints OR issues
82Search: "[competitor]" "looking for alternative" OR "anyone use"
83```
84 
85Extract:
86- **Common frustrations** discussed publicly
87- **Feature requests** their users are vocal about
88- **Sentiment patterns** — do users love or tolerate them?
89 
90### 1E: Pricing Deep Dive
91 
92```
93Fetch: [competitor] pricing page
94Search: "[competitor]" pricing OR cost OR "how much"
95```
96 
97Map their pricing:
98- **Model:** Per seat / usage-based / flat rate / hybrid
99- **Tiers:** What's in each tier?
100- **Free tier:** What's included? What's gated?
101- **Enterprise:** Custom pricing? What triggers enterprise sales?
102- **Hidden costs:** Implementation, overages, add-ons?
103 
104## Phase 2: Competitive Analysis
105 
106### Strengths & Weaknesses Matrix
107 
108| Dimension | Them | Us | Net |
109|-----------|------|-----|-----|
110| [Feature area 1] | [Rating + context] | [Rating + context] | Win/Lose/Tie |
111| [Feature area 2] | ... | ... | ... |
112| Pricing | ... | ... | ... |
113| Ease of use | ... | ... | ... |
114| Support | ... | ... | ... |
115| Integrations | ... | ... | ... |
116 
117### Where We Win (lead with these)
1181. [Strength] — [Evidence from research]
1192. [Strength] — [Evidence]
1203. [Strength] — [Evidence]
121 
122### Where We Lose (don't engage here)
1231. [Weakness] — [Mitigation strategy]
1242. [Weakness] — [How to reframe]
125 
126### Where It's Close (differentiate on narrative)
1271. [Area] — [How to position the tie as a win]
128 
129## Phase 3: Output — Battlecard
130 
131```markdown
132# Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor]
133Last updated: [DATE] | Confidence: [High/Medium — based on data freshness]
134 
135---
136 
137## Quick Reference (The 30-Second Version)
138 
139**They say:** "[Their positioning headline]"
140**We say:** "[Our counter-positioning]"
141**We win when:** [Deal profile where we have advantage]
142**We lose when:** [Deal profile where they have advantage]
143**Best opening move:** "[Question or statement to frame the deal]"
144 
145---
146 
147## Competitor Overview
148 
149| | [Competitor] |
150|---|---|
151| **Founded** | [Year] |
152| **Funding** | [Amount / stage] |
153| **Headcount** | [Estimate] |
154| **Target market** | [Who they serve] |
155| **Pricing** | [Model + range] |
156| **Category** | [How they position] |
157 
158---
159 
160## Positioning Traps
161 
162Questions to ask early in the deal that frame the evaluation in your favor:
163 
1641. **"[Question that highlights your strength]"**
165 → If they say [X], you win because [reason]
166 → If they say [Y], pivot to [angle]
167 
1682. **"[Question that exposes competitor weakness]"**
169 → Their answer will likely be [X], which reveals [limitation]
170 
1713. **"[Question about a capability they lack]"**
172 → They can't do this. When the prospect asks them, it plants doubt.
173 
174---
175 
176## Landmine Questions
177 
178Drop these casually — they'll come up when the prospect evaluates the competitor:
179 
180- "Have you asked [competitor] about [specific limitation]?"
181- "When you evaluate [competitor], make sure to test [area where they're weak]."
182- "One thing worth checking: [competitor] pricing can get expensive once you [usage trigger]."
183 
184---
185 
186## Objection Handling
187 
188### "Why shouldn't we just go with [Competitor]?"
189> "[Direct response — acknowledge their strength, pivot to your differentiation]"
190 
191### "[Competitor] has more features / is more established"
192> "[Response — focus on what matters for this buyer's use case, not feature count]"
193 
194### "[Competitor] is cheaper"
195> "[Response — reframe on total cost, hidden costs, or value per dollar]"
196 
197### "[Competitor] has [big customer logo]"
198> "[Response — your relevant social proof + why logo != fit]"
199 
200### "We're already using [Competitor]"
201> "[Response — switching cost vs cost of staying, what's changed]"
202 
203---
204 
205## Feature Comparison (Honest Assessment)
206 
207| Capability | Us | [Competitor] | Verdict |
208|-----------|-----|-------------|---------|
209| [Feature 1] | [Status + context] | [Status + context] | [Who wins + why] |
210| [Feature 2] | ... | ... | ... |
211| [Feature 3] | ... | ... | ... |
212| Pricing transparency | ... | ... | ... |
213| Onboarding speed | ... | ... | ... |
214| Support quality | ... | ... | ... |
215 
216---
217 
218## Their Customers Say (From Reviews)
219 
220### What they love (don't fight these):
221- "[Quote from review]" — [Platform, Role]
222- "[Quote]" — ...
223 
224### What they hate (exploit these):
225- "[Quote from negative review]" — [Platform, Role]
226- "[Quote]" — ...
227- "[Quote]" — ...
228 
229---
230 
231## Pricing Comparison
232 
233| | Us | [Competitor] |
234|---|---|---|
235| **Entry price** | [$/mo] | [$/mo] |
236| **Mid-tier** | [$/mo] | [$/mo] |
237| **Enterprise** | [Custom / $X] | [Custom / $X] |
238| **Free tier** | [What's included] | [What's included] |
239| **Hidden costs** | [None / list] | [Implementation, overages, etc.] |
240 
241**Pricing attack angle:** [How to frame pricing comparison favorably]
242 
243---
244 
245## Win Themes (What Wins Deals)
246 
247Based on competitive patterns:
2481. **[Theme]** — "[Proof point or quote]"
2492. **[Theme]** — ...
2503. **[Theme]** — ...
251 
252## Loss Themes (What Loses Deals)
253 
254Be aware — we tend to lose when:
2551. **[Pattern]** — Mitigation: [strategy]
2562. **[Pattern]** — Mitigation: [strategy]
257 
258---
259 
260## Quick Responses for Email/Chat
261 
262**When prospect mentions [competitor]:**
263> "[2-sentence response for email or Slack]"
264 
265**When asked for a comparison:**
266> "[3-sentence elevator pitch vs competitor]"
267```
268 
269Save to `clients/<client-name>/product-marketing/battlecards/vs-[competitor-slug]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`.
270 
271## Cost
272 
273| Component | Cost |
274|-----------|------|
275| Web research | Free |
276| Review mining (optional, via review-site-scraper) | ~$0.50-1.00 |
277| Ad analysis (optional, via ad scrapers) | ~$0.50-1.00 |
278| All analysis and battlecard generation | Free (LLM reasoning) |
279| **Total** | **Free — $2** |
280 
281## Tools Required
282 
283- **web_search** — for competitor research
284- **fetch_webpage** — for site analysis
285- **Optional:** `review-site-scraper` for G2/Capterra mining
286- **Optional:** `google-ad-scraper` for ad intelligence, `web_search` against Meta Ad Library for Meta ads
287 
288## Trigger Phrases
289 
290- "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
291- "Competitive intel on [competitor]"
292- "Run the battlecard generator for [competitor]"
293- "Help me win deals against [competitor]"
294 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

Updated
Sep 21, 2026
License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 1,220
Checked
Source
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills ↗
Creator
gooseworks-ai · 206 listings
View creator

Made with battlecard-generator

Battlecard generator — CleanShot 2026-07-13 at 20 16 54@2x (from the gooseworks-ai/goose-skills README)
Battlecard generator — CleanShot 2026-07-13 at 20 16 54@2x (from the gooseworks-ai/goose-skills README)

by gooseworks-ai

Similar skills

See all →
SkillEstimate the intrinsic value of a public company using DCFCompany valuationhimself65/finance-skills · by himself65Estimate the intrinsic value of a public company using DCF, relative (peer multiple) and sum-of-parts (SOTP) methods, then triangulate to an implied share price with upside/downside versus the current market price. Use this skill whenever the user asks: what is AAPL worth", "valuation of NVDA", "fair value of TSLA", "intrinsic value", DCF for MSFT", "build a DCF", "discounted cash flow", "WACC", "terminal value", implied share price", "upside to fair value", "is X overvalued/undervalued", relative valuation", "peer comparison valuation", "EV/EBITDA target", "SOTP", sum of the parts", "how much is [company] worth", "price target from fundamentals", value this company", or any ticker in the context of computing intrinsic or relative valuation. Default to running ALL three methods (DCF + relative + SOTP-if-applicable) and presenting a blended implied price with a sensitivity table. Do not answer valuation questions from memory — always run the workflow.★ 3.3k GitHub starsSkillFind keywords a competitor ranks for that the user's siteCompetitor gapRyze-AI-Adgent/open-seo-mcp-skills · by Ryze-AI-AdgentFind keywords a competitor ranks for that the user's site doesn't — the content gap, prioritized by volume and winnability. Use when asked "what does competitor.com rank for", "keyword gap vs X", "steal competitor keywords", or "why do they outrank us".★ 3.1k GitHub starsSkillMine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviewsAd angle minergooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiMine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviews, Reddit complaints, support tickets, and competitor ads. Extracts actual pain language, competitor weaknesses, and outcome phrases that real buyers use. Outputs a ranked angle bank with proof quotes and recommended ad formats per angle.★ 1.2k GitHub starsSkillAnalyze competitor content coverageCompetitor content intelligencesandbaseai/sandbase-skills · by sandbaseaiAnalyze competitor content coverage and uncover differentiated content opportunities using web search, page extraction, and DataForSEO content analysis. Use when asked for competitor content research, editorial gap analysis, content brief inputs, or topic whitespace.★ 203 GitHub starsSkillCreates competitive battlecards for sales deal conversationsgrowthack88/growth-marketing-os · by growthack88Creates competitive battlecards for sales deal conversations. Produces win themes, landmines to plant, objection handlers, and competitive positioning per competitor. Outputs a structured markdown battlecard with quick-reference sections for live sales calls. Depends on competitor-research for competitive intelligence and consumes product-messaging, win-loss-analysis, and positioning for framing. Feeds into sales-deck, outreach-emails, and demo-script. Triggered by "battlecard", "competitive intel", "win against [competitor]", or "how do we beat [competitor]".★ 117 GitHub starsSkillRead your X audience and niche from real dataX audience insightssergebulaev/x-skills · by sergebulaevRead your X (Twitter) audience and niche from real data. Pull a handle's recent tweets (yours or a competitor's) with likes, replies, and views, see which formats and hooks are working, read the repliers on a tweet (X gates likers, so repliers are the signal), and scan a niche query for top tweets. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze my tweets", "what is working on X", "read the replies", "competitor tweets", "who is engaging". Not for writing a tweet (use x-post-writer).★ 95 GitHub stars

More from gooseworks-ai

SkillMine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviewsAd angle minergooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiMine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviews, Reddit complaints, support tickets, and competitor ads. Extracts actual pain language, competitor weaknesses, and outcome phrases that real buyers use. Outputs a ranked angle bank with proof quotes and recommended ad formats per angle.★ 1.2k GitHub starsSkillAnalyze ad campaign performance data to identify what'sAd campaign analyzergooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiAnalyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.★ 1.2k GitHub starsSkillFor paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment adsAd lead quality analyzergooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiFor paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.★ 1.2k GitHub starsSkillAnalyze the message match between your ads and landing pagesAd to landing page auditorgooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiAnalyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.★ 1.2k GitHub starsSkillCheck and improve your brand's visibility across AI searchAeogooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiCheck and improve your brand's visibility across AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude, DeepSeek). Set up tracking, run visibility analyses, audit your website for AI readability, and get actionable recommendations. Uses the npx goose-aeo@latest CLI.★ 1.2k GitHub starsSkillSearch Amazon products - find items, compare pricesAmazon Product Searchgooseworks-ai/goose-skills · by gooseworks-aiSearch Amazon products - find items, compare prices, read reviews★ 1.2k GitHub stars