Why-What-Acceptance (WWA) skill
Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context.
by phuryn·MIT license·★ 26,557 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗
npx degit phuryn/pm-skills/pm-execution/skills/wwas#main ~/.claude/skills/wwasChecked ·commit main
Files of Why-What-Acceptance (WWA)
Show the full text70 lines
Why-What-Acceptance (WWA)
Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format. Produces independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context.
Use when: Writing backlog items, creating product increments, breaking features into work items, or communicating strategic intent to teams.
Arguments:
$PRODUCT: The product or system name$FEATURE: The new feature or capability$DESIGN: Link to design files (Figma, Miro, etc.)$ASSUMPTIONS: Key assumptions and strategic context
Step-by-Step Process
- Define the strategic Why - Connect work to business and team objectives
- Describe the What - Keep descriptions concise, reference designs
- Write Acceptance Criteria - High-level, not detailed specifications
- Ensure independence - Items can be developed in any order
- Keep items negotiable - Invite team conversation, not constraints
- Make items valuable - Each delivers measurable user or business value
- Ensure testability - Outcomes are observable and verifiable
- Size appropriately - Small enough for one sprint estimate
Item Template
Title: [What will be delivered]
Why: [1-2 sentences connecting to strategic context and team objectives]
What: [Short description and design link. 1-2 paragraphs maximum. A reminder of discussion, not detailed specification.]
Acceptance Criteria:
- [Observable outcome 1]
- [Observable outcome 2]
- [Observable outcome 3]
- [Observable outcome 4]
Example WWA Item
Title: Implement Real-Time Spending Tracker
Why: Users need immediate feedback on spending to make conscious budget decisions. This directly supports our goal to improve financial awareness and reduce overspending.
What: Add a real-time spending tracker that updates as users log expenses. The tracker displays their current week's spending against their set budget. Designs available in [Figma link]. This is a reminder of our discussions - detailed specifications will emerge during development conversations with the team.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Spending totals update within 2 seconds of logging an expense
- Budget progress is visually indicated with a progress bar
- Users can see remaining budget amount at a glance
- System handles multiple expense categories correctly
Output Deliverables
- Complete set of backlog items for the feature
- Each item includes Why, What, and Acceptance Criteria sections
- Items are independent and deliverable in any order
- Items are sized for estimation and completion in one sprint
- Strategic context is clear for team decision-making
- Design references are included for implementation guidance
Further Reading
| 1 | |
| 2 | name wwas |
| 3 | description "Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context. Use when writing structured backlog items, breaking features into work items, or using the WWA format." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | # Why-What-Acceptance (WWA) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format. Produces independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | **Use when:** Writing backlog items, creating product increments, breaking features into work items, or communicating strategic intent to teams. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | **Arguments:** |
| 12 | `$PRODUCT`: The product or system name |
| 13 | `$FEATURE`: The new feature or capability |
| 14 | `$DESIGN`: Link to design files (Figma, Miro, etc.) |
| 15 | `$ASSUMPTIONS`: Key assumptions and strategic context |
| 16 | |
| 17 | ## Step-by-Step Process |
| 18 | |
| 19 | **Define the strategic Why** - Connect work to business and team objectives |
| 20 | **Describe the What** - Keep descriptions concise, reference designs |
| 21 | **Write Acceptance Criteria** - High-level, not detailed specifications |
| 22 | **Ensure independence** - Items can be developed in any order |
| 23 | **Keep items negotiable** - Invite team conversation, not constraints |
| 24 | **Make items valuable** - Each delivers measurable user or business value |
| 25 | **Ensure testability** - Outcomes are observable and verifiable |
| 26 | **Size appropriately** - Small enough for one sprint estimate |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ## Item Template |
| 29 | |
| 30 | **Title:** [What will be delivered] |
| 31 | |
| 32 | **Why:** [1-2 sentences connecting to strategic context and team objectives] |
| 33 | |
| 34 | **What:** [Short description and design link. 1-2 paragraphs maximum. A reminder of discussion, not detailed specification.] |
| 35 | |
| 36 | **Acceptance Criteria:** |
| 37 | [Observable outcome 1] |
| 38 | [Observable outcome 2] |
| 39 | [Observable outcome 3] |
| 40 | [Observable outcome 4] |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ## Example WWA Item |
| 43 | |
| 44 | **Title:** Implement Real-Time Spending Tracker |
| 45 | |
| 46 | **Why:** Users need immediate feedback on spending to make conscious budget decisions. This directly supports our goal to improve financial awareness and reduce overspending. |
| 47 | |
| 48 | **What:** Add a real-time spending tracker that updates as users log expenses. The tracker displays their current week's spending against their set budget. Designs available in [Figma link]. This is a reminder of our discussions - detailed specifications will emerge during development conversations with the team. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | **Acceptance Criteria:** |
| 51 | Spending totals update within 2 seconds of logging an expense |
| 52 | Budget progress is visually indicated with a progress bar |
| 53 | Users can see remaining budget amount at a glance |
| 54 | System handles multiple expense categories correctly |
| 55 | |
| 56 | ## Output Deliverables |
| 57 | |
| 58 | Complete set of backlog items for the feature |
| 59 | Each item includes Why, What, and Acceptance Criteria sections |
| 60 | Items are independent and deliverable in any order |
| 61 | Items are sized for estimation and completion in one sprint |
| 62 | Strategic context is clear for team decision-making |
| 63 | Design references are included for implementation guidance |
| 64 | |
| 65 | |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ### Further Reading |
| 68 | |
| 69 | [How to Write User Stories: The Ultimate Guide] |
| 70 |
Discussion
Alternatives
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Product.