Llm Evaluation
Unverified●31/40Claude Code◐PartialHas SKILL.md but declares no allowed-tools — Claude Code will ask for permission each time
Cursor◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Cursor rules file
Codex◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no AGENTS.md
Gemini CLI◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in
Copilot◐PartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Copilot instructions file
npx agentalley add llm-evaluationWho is stuck, and on what
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
The whole source
Frontmatter — 2 properties
| name | llm-evaluation |
|---|---|
| description | Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks. |
| 1 | --- |
| 2 | name: llm-evaluation |
| 3 | description: Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks. |
| 4 | ---A5 — No allowed-tools declared — no way to tell what this skill may touch |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # LLM Evaluation |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## When to Use This Skill |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - Measuring LLM application performance systematically |
| 13 | - Comparing different models or prompts |
| 14 | - Detecting performance regressions before deployment |
| 15 | - Validating improvements from prompt changes |
| 16 | - Building confidence in production systems |
| 17 | - Establishing baselines and tracking progress over time |
| 18 | - Debugging unexpected model behavior |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ## Core Evaluation Types |
| 21 | |
| 22 | ### 1. Automated Metrics |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Fast, repeatable, scalable evaluation using computed scores. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | **Text Generation:** |
| 27 | |
| 28 | - **BLEU**: N-gram overlap (translation) |
| 29 | - **ROUGE**: Recall-oriented (summarization) |
| 30 | - **METEOR**: Semantic similarity |
| 31 | - **BERTScore**: Embedding-based similarity |
| 32 | - **Perplexity**: Language model confidence |
| 33 | |
| 34 | **Classification:** |
| 35 | |
| 36 | - **Accuracy**: Percentage correct |
| 37 | - **Precision/Recall/F1**: Class-specific performance |
| 38 | - **Confusion Matrix**: Error patterns |
| 39 | - **AUC-ROC**: Ranking quality |
| 40 | |
| 41 | **Retrieval (RAG):** |
| 42 | |
| 43 | - **MRR**: Mean Reciprocal Rank |
| 44 | - **NDCG**: Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain |
| 45 | - **Precision@K**: Relevant in top K |
| 46 | - **Recall@K**: Coverage in top K |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ### 2. Human Evaluation |
| 49 | |
| 50 | Manual assessment for quality aspects difficult to automate. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | **Dimensions:** |
| 53 | |
| 54 | - **Accuracy**: Factual correctness |
| 55 | - **Coherence**: Logical flow |
| 56 | - **Relevance**: Answers the question |
| 57 | - **Fluency**: Natural language quality |
| 58 | - **Safety**: No harmful content |
| 59 | - **Helpfulness**: Useful to the user |
| 60 | |
| 61 | ### 3. LLM-as-Judge |
| 62 | |
| 63 | Use stronger LLMs to evaluate weaker model outputs. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | **Approaches:** |
| 66 | |
| 67 | - **Pointwise**: Score individual responses |
| 68 | - **Pairwise**: Compare two responses |
| 69 | - **Reference-based**: Compare to gold standard |
| 70 | - **Reference-free**: Judge without ground truth |
| 71 | |
| 72 | ## Quick Start |
| 73 | |
| 74 | ```python |
| 75 | from dataclasses import dataclass |
| 76 | from typing import Callable |
| 77 | import numpy as np |
| 78 | |
| 79 | @dataclass |
| 80 | class Metric: |
| 81 | name: str |
| 82 | fn: Callable |
| 83 | |
| 84 | @staticmethod |
| 85 | def accuracy(): |
| 86 | return Metric("accuracy", calculate_accuracy) |
| 87 | |
| 88 | @staticmethod |
| 89 | def bleu(): |
| 90 | return Metric("bleu", calculate_bleu) |
| 91 | |
| 92 | @staticmethod |
| 93 | def bertscore(): |
| 94 | return Metric("bertscore", calculate_bertscore) |
| 95 | |
| 96 | @staticmethod |
| 97 | def custom(name: str, fn: Callable): |
| 98 | return Metric(name, fn) |
| 99 | |
| 100 | class EvaluationSuite: |
| 101 | def __init__(self, metrics: list[Metric]): |
| 102 | self.metrics = metrics |
| 103 | |
| 104 | async def evaluate(self, model, test_cases: list[dict]) -> dict: |
| 105 | results = {m.name: [] for m in self.metrics} |
| 106 | |
| 107 | for test in test_cases: |
| 108 | prediction = await model.predict(test["input"]) |
| 109 | |
| 110 | for metric in self.metrics: |
| 111 | score = metric.fn( |
| 112 | prediction=prediction, |
| 113 | reference=test.get("expected"), |
| 114 | context=test.get("context") |
| 115 | ) |
| 116 | results[metric.name].append(score) |
| 117 | |
| 118 | return { |
| 119 | "metrics": {k: np.mean(v) for k, v in results.items()}, |
| 120 | "raw_scores": results |
| 121 | } |
| 122 | |
| 123 | # Usage |
| 124 | suite = EvaluationSuite([ |
| 125 | Metric.accuracy(), |
| 126 | Metric.bleu(), |
| 127 | Metric.bertscore(), |
| 128 | Metric.custom("groundedness", check_groundedness) |
| 129 | ]) |
| 130 | |
| 131 | test_cases = [ |
| 132 | { |
| 133 | "input": "What is the capital of France?", |
| 134 | "expected": "Paris", |
| 135 | "context": "France is a country in Europe. Paris is its capital." |
| 136 | }, |
| 137 | ] |
| 138 | |
| 139 | results = await suite.evaluate(model=your_model, test_cases=test_cases) |
| 140 | ``` |
| 141 | |
| 142 | ## Detailed patterns and worked examples |
| 143 | |
| 144 | Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient. |
| 145 | |
| 146 |
Reviews
Installed this one?Write the first review and take the Trailblazer badge.
Alternatives
Task Coordination StrategiesDecompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate multi-agent work with proper task descriptions and workload balancing. Use this skill when breaking down work for agent teams, managing task dependencies, or monitoring team progress.◐◐◐◐◐●35/40Ebay Seller Tools·····●34/40Tough Decision Advisor: Every Angle ConsideredHand in a decision you're stuck on. Get back a clear breakdown of every angle — the trade-offs, the risks, the blind spot, and a recommended path.●····●32/40DHDNA Profiler — Cognitive Pattern ExtractionPaste any email, proposal, or note someone wrote, and get back a plain-language read on how they think, what drives their decisions, and how they communicate.●····●32/40