Interface writing

Focuses on improving product copy in your project.

How to use it

Claude Code
  1. Run the line below. It pulls the whole folder into ~/.claude/skills/better-writing.
  2. Describe your job in plain words. Claude Code follows the skill from there.
Claude Code — installs the whole folder, not just SKILL.md
npx degit jakubkrehel/skills/skills/better-writing#main ~/.claude/skills/better-writing

For one project only, change the path to .claude/skills/better-writing.

Claude (web or desktop app)
  1. On this page open ⋯ → Download .md.
  2. Save it as SKILL.md in a folder, zip the folder, then Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill.
  3. Pick the file and Save. Claude shows the name and description and runs a security scan.
  4. Check the skill is switched on.
  5. Start a new chat and describe your job in plain words. The AI follows the skill from there.
ChatGPT or another app
  1. ChatGPT: make a Project and paste it into Instructions.
  2. Neither? Paste it at the top of a new chat — it works for that chat.
Not working?
  • Check which app you pasted it into — the steps above name the right one.
  • Some skills need the paid tier of Claude or ChatGPT.
Step-by-step guide with screenshots · Ask in the forum

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Source of Interface writing

Show the full text115 lines
namedescription
better-writingFocuses on improving product copy in your project.

Interface writing

Clear and brief beats clever; consistent beats varied. The best error message is the interaction redesigned so the error cannot happen.

How copy renders (capitalization via text-transform, truncation, smart punctuation) belongs to better-typography. Error markup and announcements (aria-invalid, live regions) belong to better-accessibility. Room for translated strings belongs to better-layout.

Recon the existing voice

Before writing or reviewing, read the copy nearby. Note the product's terminology, its localization conventions and any voice or content style guide.

A deliberate brand voice is not a defect. Raise a departure from plain language only when it creates inconsistency, ambiguity, translation risk, or a tone the stakes don't support.

One voice, flexible tone

The product has one voice and its existing copy establishes it. A local edit does not get to invent a new one. Keep terms consistent: if it's "Archive" in the menu, it isn't "Move to storage" in the toast. Tone flexes with the stakes:

Context Tone
Success, onboarding, empty states Warm, can be light
Routine actions, settings Neutral, minimal
Errors, destructive confirmations Calm, plain, zero playfulness
Data loss, security Serious, explicit

Address the reader directly

In instructional copy, write "you", not "the user". In errors, "we" invites ambiguity and reads as deflection, so prefer "Unable to load content" over "We're having trouble loading this content". An established first-person voice can stay in low-stakes copy where it still reads clearly.

Use possessives sparingly: "Favorites" beats "Your Favorites". Hold one perspective throughout a flow.

Plain words over clever ones

Choose words a tired reader gets on the first pass, and delete every word that does no work. No idioms, no colloquialisms, no humor that won't translate.

Skip unnecessary gender: "Subscribers can post recipes", not "each subscriber can post his or her recipes". Match the input device: "tap" on touch, "click" with a pointer, "select" when both are possible.

Never assemble a sentence from fragments around a variable ("You have " + n + " new messages"), because word order changes per language. Use a full templated string with proper pluralization.

Verb-first buttons

A button label starts with a verb naming the action: "Send", "Save draft", "Delete project". Never "OK!", "Let's go!", or a bare "Yes" and "No" on a consequential action.

A confirmation button repeats the consequence, so the dialog is answerable without reading the body. "Delete this project?" offers Delete project and Cancel.

Consistent flow vocabulary

A multi-step flow uses one vocabulary throughout: "Get started" to enter, "Continue" or "Next" (pick one) to advance, "Done" to finish. Alternating synonyms makes users wonder whether the buttons do different things.

Link text has to make sense out of context, because screen-reader users navigate by a list of the page's links. Write "Read the billing docs". "Click here" fails this and the device-verb rule at once.

A bare "Learn more" breaks down as soon as two appear on one page. Suffix each one: "Learn more about exports".

One capitalization policy

Pick title case or sentence case per element type, then apply it to every instance of that type. Sentence case is the safer default. It is calmer, has no per-word rules to remember and localizes cleanly. "Save Changes" beside "Discard changes" reads as sloppiness.

Settings describe the ON state

Label a toggle for what happens when it is on. "Send read receipts" lets users infer the off state; the negative ("Don't send read receipts") turns the toggle into a double negative.

Link straight to a referenced setting rather than describing the path to it: a "Notification settings" link, not "Go to Settings > Notifications > Email".

Errors say how to fix, next to where it broke

An error is an instruction, and it belongs beside the field that failed:

Bad Good
That password is too short Choose a password with at least 8 characters
Invalid name Use only letters for your name
Oops! Something went wrong. Unable to save. Check your connection and try again.

No blame, no "oops", no exclamation marks. Phrase hints positively ("Use only letters", not "Don't use numbers or symbols") and show them before the mistake, not after. When the same error keeps firing, redesign the interaction instead of rewording it.

Empty states point forward

An empty state says what this place is, how to fill it and offers one clear next action:

<!-- Bad: a shrug -->
<p>No results.</p>

<!-- Good: orientation plus a next step -->
<p class="font-medium">No projects yet</p>
<p class="text-sm text-zinc-500">Projects keep your tasks and files together.</p>
<button class="mt-4">Create a project</button>

A search or filter empty state names the query and offers an exit: "No results for 'quarterly'. Clear filters". Never park persistent information in an empty state. It disappears the moment content exists.

Placeholders are examples, not labels

A placeholder shows the expected format: [email protected], DD/MM/YYYY. It vanishes on input, so it is never the only label. Every field keeps a visible one.

Reporting

Severity. HIGH misleads the user or hides how to recover from an error. MEDIUM breaks voice, terminology, or capitalization consistency. LOW is isolated wording polish.

Verification. Source alone is enough here. Check every label against the action it invokes, every error for a stated fix and terminology against the copy around it. No browser check is required.

Format. Group findings under the principle each violates, ordered by severity, one row per root cause listing every location it appears in:

Severity Location Before After Why

Location is path/to/file:line. Why names the principle and the user impact.

End with Block when any HIGH remains, Approve otherwise, leaving the rest in the table as work to do. Never Approve coverage you did not inspect. With nothing to report, state "No actionable writing findings" and report verification.

1---
2name: better-writing
3description: Focuses on improving product copy in your project.
4---
5 
6# Interface writing
7 
8Clear and brief beats clever; consistent beats varied. The best error message is the interaction redesigned so the error cannot happen.
9 
10How copy renders (capitalization via `text-transform`, truncation, smart punctuation) belongs to `better-typography`. Error markup and announcements (`aria-invalid`, live regions) belong to `better-accessibility`. Room for translated strings belongs to `better-layout`.
11 
12## Recon the existing voice
13 
14Before writing or reviewing, read the copy nearby. Note the product's terminology, its localization conventions and any voice or content style guide.
15 
16A deliberate brand voice is not a defect. Raise a departure from plain language only when it creates inconsistency, ambiguity, translation risk, or a tone the stakes don't support.
17 
18## One voice, flexible tone
19 
20The product has one voice and its existing copy establishes it. A local edit does not get to invent a new one. Keep terms consistent: if it's "Archive" in the menu, it isn't "Move to storage" in the toast. Tone flexes with the stakes:
21 
22| Context | Tone |
23| --- | --- |
24| Success, onboarding, empty states | Warm, can be light |
25| Routine actions, settings | Neutral, minimal |
26| Errors, destructive confirmations | Calm, plain, zero playfulness |
27| Data loss, security | Serious, explicit |
28 
29## Address the reader directly
30 
31In instructional copy, write "you", not "the user". In errors, "we" invites ambiguity and reads as deflection, so prefer "Unable to load content" over "We're having trouble loading this content". An established first-person voice can stay in low-stakes copy where it still reads clearly.
32 
33Use possessives sparingly: "Favorites" beats "Your Favorites". Hold one perspective throughout a flow.
34 
35## Plain words over clever ones
36 
37Choose words a tired reader gets on the first pass, and delete every word that does no work. No idioms, no colloquialisms, no humor that won't translate.
38 
39Skip unnecessary gender: "Subscribers can post recipes", not "each subscriber can post his or her recipes". Match the input device: "tap" on touch, "click" with a pointer, "select" when both are possible.
40 
41Never assemble a sentence from fragments around a variable (`"You have " + n + " new messages"`), because word order changes per language. Use a full templated string with proper pluralization.
42 
43## Verb-first buttons
44 
45A button label starts with a verb naming the action: "Send", "Save draft", "Delete project". Never "OK!", "Let's go!", or a bare "Yes" and "No" on a consequential action.
46 
47A confirmation button repeats the consequence, so the dialog is answerable without reading the body. "Delete this project?" offers `Delete project` and `Cancel`.
48 
49## Consistent flow vocabulary
50 
51A multi-step flow uses one vocabulary throughout: "Get started" to enter, "Continue" or "Next" (pick one) to advance, "Done" to finish. Alternating synonyms makes users wonder whether the buttons do different things.
52 
53## Links describe their destination
54 
55Link text has to make sense out of context, because screen-reader users navigate by a list of the page's links. Write "Read the billing docs". "Click here" fails this and the device-verb rule at once.
56 
57A bare "Learn more" breaks down as soon as two appear on one page. Suffix each one: "Learn more about exports".
58 
59## One capitalization policy
60 
61Pick title case or sentence case per element type, then apply it to every instance of that type. Sentence case is the safer default. It is calmer, has no per-word rules to remember and localizes cleanly. "Save Changes" beside "Discard changes" reads as sloppiness.
62 
63## Settings describe the ON state
64 
65Label a toggle for what happens when it is on. "Send read receipts" lets users infer the off state; the negative ("Don't send read receipts") turns the toggle into a double negative.
66 
67Link straight to a referenced setting rather than describing the path to it: a "Notification settings" link, not "Go to Settings > Notifications > Email".
68 
69## Errors say how to fix, next to where it broke
70 
71An error is an instruction, and it belongs beside the field that failed:
72 
73| Bad | Good |
74| --- | --- |
75| That password is too short | Choose a password with at least 8 characters |
76| Invalid name | Use only letters for your name |
77| Oops! Something went wrong. | Unable to save. Check your connection and try again. |
78 
79No blame, no "oops", no exclamation marks. Phrase hints positively ("Use only letters", not "Don't use numbers or symbols") and show them before the mistake, not after. When the same error keeps firing, redesign the interaction instead of rewording it.
80 
81## Empty states point forward
82 
83An empty state says what this place is, how to fill it and offers one clear next action:
84 
85```html
86<!-- Bad: a shrug -->
87<p>No results.</p>
88 
89<!-- Good: orientation plus a next step -->
90<p class="font-medium">No projects yet</p>
91<p class="text-sm text-zinc-500">Projects keep your tasks and files together.</p>
92<button class="mt-4">Create a project</button>
93```
94 
95A search or filter empty state names the query and offers an exit: "No results for 'quarterly'. Clear filters". Never park persistent information in an empty state. It disappears the moment content exists.
96 
97## Placeholders are examples, not labels
98 
99A placeholder shows the expected format: `[email protected]`, `DD/MM/YYYY`. It vanishes on input, so it is never the only label. Every field keeps a visible one.
100 
101## Reporting
102 
103**Severity.** `HIGH` misleads the user or hides how to recover from an error. `MEDIUM` breaks voice, terminology, or capitalization consistency. `LOW` is isolated wording polish.
104 
105**Verification.** Source alone is enough here. Check every label against the action it invokes, every error for a stated fix and terminology against the copy around it. No browser check is required.
106 
107**Format.** Group findings under the principle each violates, ordered by severity, one row per root cause listing every location it appears in:
108 
109| Severity | Location | Before | After | Why |
110| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
111 
112`Location` is `path/to/file:line`. `Why` names the principle and the user impact.
113 
114End with `Block` when any `HIGH` remains, `Approve` otherwise, leaving the rest in the table as work to do. Never `Approve` coverage you did not inspect. With nothing to report, state "No actionable writing findings" and report verification.
115 

Discussion

Alternatives

Also in Interface designSee all 106 in Design →
Frontend designGuidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.Design & UI · Apache-2.0ImpeccableUse when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.Design & UI · Apache-2.0Apple designApple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.Design & UI · MITBuilding AnimationsBuild an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.Design & UI · MIT