38 community seeding global skill
Use when the user wants to show up in OTHER communities without astroturfing — Reddit, Facebook Groups, Discord, Slack, LinkedIn groups, Quora, and niche forums: a prioritized community list with the rules of each space, a named participant roster, post types written in full, reply scripts, a participation calendar, and red lines.
by minhnv0807·MIT license·★ 599 Stars on the repo·GitHub ↗
npx degit minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/skills/en/38-community-seeding-global#master ~/.claude/skills/38-community-seeding-globalChecked ·commit master
Files of 38 community seeding global
Show the full text199 lines
Community Seeding (Global)
Community marketing done properly is participation, not placement. A brand earns the right to mention itself by being useful first, under a real name, in communities whose rules it has actually read. Manufactured engagement — sockpuppets, brand-written reviews, coordinated voting — is both against every major platform's rules and, in the US, against FTC rules. Getting caught is a bigger loss than never posting.
Full per-platform rules, disclosure mechanics, and cadence limits: read
references/platform-rules.md.
Information gathering
Read .agents/product-marketing-context-global.md and the insight file (09-customer-insight-global) first. If information is missing, ask up to 4 questions:
- What is being marketed, and which communities does the target audience actually spend time in? (subreddits, Discord servers, Slack groups, Facebook Groups, LinkedIn groups, Quora topics, niche forums)
- What is the objective? Awareness / qualified leads / traffic / genuine social proof / product feedback
- Who on the team will participate under their real name, and how much time per week can they give?
- Has the brand posted in these communities before — what happened, and was anything removed or banned?
Principles
- Real people, real names, one account each. Every participant is an actual member of the team using a single account with their own identity. No personas, no second accounts, no purchased or aged accounts.
- Value first, at roughly 9:1. For every promotional or self-referential post, contribute nine genuinely useful ones. This ratio is Reddit's long-standing self-promotion norm and travels well to every other community.
- Read the rules before the first post. Every subreddit, server, and group has its own self-promotion policy. Many require flair, a specific thread, or a minimum tenure. Rules override this plan.
- Disclose the material connection every time. If the person works for, is paid by, or holds equity in the brand, that must be clear in the post itself — not buried in a bio. This is FTC 16 CFR Part 255.
- Never write a review as if it came from a customer. Brand-authored or employee-authored reviews presented as independent are prohibited under the FTC fake-review rule (16 CFR Part 465) and carry civil penalties. Customer stories must come from the customer, with permission on file.
- No vote manipulation or coordinated engagement. No asking colleagues to upvote, no brigading, no cross-account replies to your own posts. Platforms detect this reliably.
- Warm up before you contribute anything promotional. Minimum two weeks of ordinary participation per community; four is better.
- Measurable or it does not count. UTM where links are permitted, a "how did you hear about us" field, and a log of removals and bans.
Workflow — 4 phases
Phase 1 — Community research and rules mapping (1 week)
Selection criteria:
| Criterion | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Size | Large enough to matter, small enough to be read — for niche B2B, 3,000 engaged members beats 300,000 dormant ones |
| Activity | Daily posts with real comment threads, not a wall of unanswered links |
| Rules | Self-promotion permitted in some form (dedicated thread, flair, tenure gate) — record the exact rule text |
| Moderation | Active mods. Well-moderated communities are safer to invest in than unmoderated ones |
| Audience fit | Members match the ICP from 09-customer-insight-global |
Output: a table of communities ranked High / Medium / Low priority, with each community's self-promotion rule quoted, its link policy, and the content types that fit it.
Phase 2 — Participant setup and warm-up (2-4 weeks)
Each participant needs:
- A real profile: real name, real photo, a bio that states where they work. Affiliation visible before anyone has to ask.
- Genuine history: joined, commented, answered questions 3-5 times a week, without mentioning the brand.
- A consistent area of expertise that matches what they actually know — a support lead answers support questions, a founder answers business-model questions.
- No brand mention at all during warm-up.
A new account with no history is not usable for this work. If nobody on the team can commit the time, do not run the plan — hand the objective to 06-ugc-egc-brief-global and work with creators who are already members of those communities, under a disclosed paid arrangement.
Phase 3 — Participation content (ongoing)
Four post types, each written in full at 150-300 words, in a real person's voice rather than a brand voice:
| Type | Purpose | Brand mention rule |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Genuine question / research post | Learn from the community, surface demand language | No brand mention at all |
| 2. Expertise share / teardown | Give real, specific value; earn recognition | Affiliation stated up front; product mentioned only if it is genuinely the answer |
| 3. Answering an existing thread | Help someone who already asked | Disclose the connection in the same comment, in plain words |
| 4. Customer story amplification | Real social proof | Written by the customer, posted by the customer or clearly attributed with permission. Never brand-authored |
What performs in communities: open questions, specific how-we-did-it write-ups with numbers, short guides, teardowns, and honest post-mortems including what did not work.
Response handling for every post:
- Prepare honest answers to the 3-5 questions members will realistically ask (pricing, availability, whether it actually works, alternatives — including competitors).
- Reply within the first few hours. Early real engagement is what most feeds reward.
- If someone asks whether you work there, answer plainly. Never deflect.
- Recommend the product only when a member has described a problem it genuinely solves, and disclose in the same breath.
Phase 4 — Measurement
| Metric | How to capture |
|---|---|
| Post reach and engagement | Native post stats per community; screenshot where no export exists |
| Inbound DMs and mentions | Ask "how did you hear about us" at first contact; log the community |
| Traffic | UTM per community, only where links are allowed by the rules |
| Leads and revenue | CRM source field set to the community name |
| Removals, warnings, bans | Log every one with the rule cited — this is the risk signal that decides whether to keep investing in that community |
| Sentiment | Track how the brand is spoken about unprompted, via 15-social-listening-global |
Output structure
File name: community-seeding-[product]-[YYYYMMDD].md
# Community Seeding Plan — [Product] — [Period]
## I. Target communities
| Community | Platform | Size | Activity | Self-promotion rule (quoted) | Link policy | Priority | Content types that fit |
|-----------|----------|------|----------|------------------------------|-------------|----------|------------------------|
| | | | | | | High/Med/Low | |
## II. Participant roster
| Person | Role | Account | Expertise area | Warm-up status | Communities owned | Weekly time |
|--------|------|---------|----------------|----------------|-------------------|-------------|
| | | | | Not started / In progress / Ready | | |
## III. Four post types — written in full
### Type 1 — Genuine question (no brand mention)
[Full post, 150-300 words, real person's voice]
### Type 2 — Expertise share (affiliation stated up front)
[Full post — real insight, specific, not an advertisement]
### Type 3 — Answering an existing thread (connection disclosed inline)
[Full reply — answers the question first, mentions the product only if it is the honest answer]
### Type 4 — Customer story amplification (customer-authored, permission on file)
[The customer's own words + where permission is recorded]
## IV. Response scripts
| Likely question | Honest prepared answer | Who answers |
|-----------------|------------------------|-------------|
| | | |
## V. Participation calendar
| Date | Community | Post type | Participant | Summary | Target engagement |
|------|-----------|-----------|-------------|---------|-------------------|
| | | | | | |
## VI. Measurement
| Post | Community | Engagement | DMs | Leads | Removed / warned | Notes |
|------|-----------|------------|-----|-------|------------------|-------|
| | | | | | | |
## VII. Compliance log
| Post | Disclosure used | Rule checked | Approver |
|------|-----------------|--------------|----------|
| | | | |
Red lines — never do these
- Never create or use a persona, sockpuppet, or second account. One real person, one account.
- Never write a review, testimonial, or "just a happy customer" post on behalf of a customer.
- Never ask colleagues to upvote, like, or reply to make a post look organic. That is vote manipulation on Reddit and coordinated inauthentic behavior on Meta.
- Never omit the material-connection disclosure when a participant is an employee, contractor, affiliate, or equity holder.
- Never post an identical block of text across multiple communities. Spam filters and members both notice.
- Never drop a product link in the first post to a community, or in any community whose rules forbid links.
- Never cold-DM members who have not asked to be contacted.
- Never argue with moderators. If a post is removed, read the rule, adjust, and move on.
Risks to manage: post removal or account ban (lost warm-up time — prevent by following rules); public exposure as astroturfing (severe brand damage — prevent by never doing it, and by answering affiliation questions honestly); community rule changes (re-read rules monthly); FTC enforcement on undisclosed endorsements and fake reviews (prevent with the compliance log in section VII).
Related skills
09-customer-insight-global: identifies which communities the ICP actually uses and supplies their real language.15-social-listening-global: tells you what the community is already discussing, so the angle fits an active conversation.35-brand-voice-global: types 2 and 3 still have to match the brand's core message, even written in a personal register.06-ugc-egc-brief-global: the paid alternative — working with creators and community members through a disclosed paid arrangement.37-social-caption-global: owned-channel posts, which follow different rules from community posts.39-content-audit-global: feed community results into the periodic audit to decide which communities to keep.
Quality checklist
- Every community's self-promotion rule is quoted verbatim, not summarized from memory.
- Every participant is a real, named person with one account and a stated affiliation.
- Warm-up of at least two weeks completed before any promotional participation.
- All 4 post types written in full — no outlines.
- Posts read as a person wrote them, not a brand page.
- No brand-authored customer reviews anywhere in the plan.
- Material connection disclosed in every post where one exists, in the post itself.
- Value-to-promotion ratio across the calendar is at least 9:1.
- Cadence respects each community's rules and does not repeat identical text.
- Measurement defined per post (UTM where permitted, source field, DM attribution).
- Removal and ban log in place.
- No red line is crossed anywhere in the plan.
| 1 | |
| 2 | name 38-community-seeding-global |
| 3 | description "Use when the user wants to show up in OTHER communities without astroturfing — Reddit, Facebook Groups, Discord, Slack, LinkedIn groups, Quora, and niche forums: a prioritized community list with the rules of each space, a named participant roster, post types written in full, reply scripts, a participation calendar, and red lines. Trigger on 'community marketing', 'Reddit marketing', 'seeding plan', 'post in Facebook groups', 'answer questions on Quora', 'we got banned from a group'. Not for — building your OWN paid or private community, see `28-community-building-global`; monitoring mentions across the web, see `15-social-listening-global`; briefing paid creators, see `06-ugc-egc-brief-global`." |
| 4 | metadata |
| 5 | version 1.0.1 |
| 6 | category content |
| 7 | license MIT |
| 8 | triggers |
| 9 | - "community marketing" |
| 10 | - "Reddit marketing" |
| 11 | - "seeding plan" |
| 12 | - "post in groups" |
| 13 | - "community strategy" |
| 14 | - "forum marketing" |
| 15 | - "Discord communities" |
| 16 | - "Quora answers" |
| 17 | output "File .md — prioritized community list with rules, named participant roster, 4 post types written in full, response scripts, participation calendar, measurement table, compliance and red-line checklist" |
| 18 | related |
| 19 | - product-marketing-context-global |
| 20 | - 09-customer-insight-global |
| 21 | - 15-social-listening-global |
| 22 | - 35-brand-voice-global |
| 23 | - 37-social-caption-global |
| 24 | - 06-ugc-egc-brief-global |
| 25 | - 39-content-audit-global |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | # Community Seeding (Global) |
| 29 | |
| 30 | Community marketing done properly is participation, not placement. A brand earns the right to mention itself by being useful first, under a real name, in communities whose rules it has actually read. Manufactured engagement — sockpuppets, brand-written reviews, coordinated voting — is both against every major platform's rules and, in the US, against FTC rules. Getting caught is a bigger loss than never posting. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | > Full per-platform rules, disclosure mechanics, and cadence limits: read `references/platform-rules.md`. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | ## Information gathering |
| 35 | |
| 36 | Read `.agents/product-marketing-context-global.md` and the insight file (`09-customer-insight-global`) first. If information is missing, ask up to 4 questions: |
| 37 | |
| 38 | **What is being marketed, and which communities does the target audience actually spend time in?** (subreddits, Discord servers, Slack groups, Facebook Groups, LinkedIn groups, Quora topics, niche forums) |
| 39 | **What is the objective?** Awareness / qualified leads / traffic / genuine social proof / product feedback |
| 40 | **Who on the team will participate under their real name, and how much time per week can they give?** |
| 41 | **Has the brand posted in these communities before — what happened, and was anything removed or banned?** |
| 42 | |
| 43 | ## Principles |
| 44 | |
| 45 | **Real people, real names, one account each.** Every participant is an actual member of the team using a single account with their own identity. No personas, no second accounts, no purchased or aged accounts. |
| 46 | **Value first, at roughly 9:1.** For every promotional or self-referential post, contribute nine genuinely useful ones. This ratio is Reddit's long-standing self-promotion norm and travels well to every other community. |
| 47 | **Read the rules before the first post.** Every subreddit, server, and group has its own self-promotion policy. Many require flair, a specific thread, or a minimum tenure. Rules override this plan. |
| 48 | **Disclose the material connection every time.** If the person works for, is paid by, or holds equity in the brand, that must be clear in the post itself — not buried in a bio. This is FTC 16 CFR Part 255. |
| 49 | **Never write a review as if it came from a customer.** Brand-authored or employee-authored reviews presented as independent are prohibited under the FTC fake-review rule (16 CFR Part 465) and carry civil penalties. Customer stories must come from the customer, with permission on file. |
| 50 | **No vote manipulation or coordinated engagement.** No asking colleagues to upvote, no brigading, no cross-account replies to your own posts. Platforms detect this reliably. |
| 51 | **Warm up before you contribute anything promotional.** Minimum two weeks of ordinary participation per community; four is better. |
| 52 | **Measurable or it does not count.** UTM where links are permitted, a "how did you hear about us" field, and a log of removals and bans. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | ## Workflow — 4 phases |
| 55 | |
| 56 | ### Phase 1 — Community research and rules mapping (1 week) |
| 57 | |
| 58 | Selection criteria: |
| 59 | |
| 60 | | Criterion | Threshold | |
| 61 | |-----------|-----------| |
| 62 | | Size | Large enough to matter, small enough to be read — for niche B2B, 3,000 engaged members beats 300,000 dormant ones | |
| 63 | | Activity | Daily posts with real comment threads, not a wall of unanswered links | |
| 64 | | Rules | Self-promotion permitted in some form (dedicated thread, flair, tenure gate) — record the exact rule text | |
| 65 | | Moderation | Active mods. Well-moderated communities are safer to invest in than unmoderated ones | |
| 66 | | Audience fit | Members match the ICP from `09-customer-insight-global` | |
| 67 | |
| 68 | Output: a table of communities ranked High / Medium / Low priority, with each community's self-promotion rule quoted, its link policy, and the content types that fit it. |
| 69 | |
| 70 | ### Phase 2 — Participant setup and warm-up (2-4 weeks) |
| 71 | |
| 72 | Each participant needs: |
| 73 | |
| 74 | A real profile: real name, real photo, a bio that states where they work. Affiliation visible before anyone has to ask. |
| 75 | Genuine history: joined, commented, answered questions 3-5 times a week, without mentioning the brand. |
| 76 | A consistent area of expertise that matches what they actually know — a support lead answers support questions, a founder answers business-model questions. |
| 77 | No brand mention at all during warm-up. |
| 78 | |
| 79 | A new account with no history is not usable for this work. If nobody on the team can commit the time, do not run the plan — hand the objective to `06-ugc-egc-brief-global` and work with creators who are already members of those communities, under a disclosed paid arrangement. |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ### Phase 3 — Participation content (ongoing) |
| 82 | |
| 83 | Four post types, each written in full at 150-300 words, in a real person's voice rather than a brand voice: |
| 84 | |
| 85 | | Type | Purpose | Brand mention rule | |
| 86 | |------|---------|--------------------| |
| 87 | | 1. Genuine question / research post | Learn from the community, surface demand language | No brand mention at all | |
| 88 | | 2. Expertise share / teardown | Give real, specific value; earn recognition | Affiliation stated up front; product mentioned only if it is genuinely the answer | |
| 89 | | 3. Answering an existing thread | Help someone who already asked | Disclose the connection in the same comment, in plain words | |
| 90 | | 4. Customer story amplification | Real social proof | Written by the customer, posted by the customer or clearly attributed with permission. Never brand-authored | |
| 91 | |
| 92 | What performs in communities: open questions, specific how-we-did-it write-ups with numbers, short guides, teardowns, and honest post-mortems including what did not work. |
| 93 | |
| 94 | Response handling for every post: |
| 95 | |
| 96 | Prepare honest answers to the 3-5 questions members will realistically ask (pricing, availability, whether it actually works, alternatives — including competitors). |
| 97 | Reply within the first few hours. Early real engagement is what most feeds reward. |
| 98 | If someone asks whether you work there, answer plainly. Never deflect. |
| 99 | Recommend the product only when a member has described a problem it genuinely solves, and disclose in the same breath. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | ### Phase 4 — Measurement |
| 102 | |
| 103 | | Metric | How to capture | |
| 104 | |--------|----------------| |
| 105 | | Post reach and engagement | Native post stats per community; screenshot where no export exists | |
| 106 | | Inbound DMs and mentions | Ask "how did you hear about us" at first contact; log the community | |
| 107 | | Traffic | UTM per community, only where links are allowed by the rules | |
| 108 | | Leads and revenue | CRM source field set to the community name | |
| 109 | | Removals, warnings, bans | Log every one with the rule cited — this is the risk signal that decides whether to keep investing in that community | |
| 110 | | Sentiment | Track how the brand is spoken about unprompted, via `15-social-listening-global` | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | ## Output structure |
| 113 | |
| 114 | File name: `community-seeding-[product]-[YYYYMMDD].md` |
| 115 | |
| 116 | |
| 117 | # Community Seeding Plan — [Product] — [Period] |
| 118 | |
| 119 | ## I. Target communities |
| 120 | | Community | Platform | Size | Activity | Self-promotion rule (quoted) | Link policy | Priority | Content types that fit | |
| 121 | |-----------|----------|------|----------|------------------------------|-------------|----------|------------------------| |
| 122 | | | | | | | | High/Med/Low | | |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ## II. Participant roster |
| 125 | | Person | Role | Account | Expertise area | Warm-up status | Communities owned | Weekly time | |
| 126 | |--------|------|---------|----------------|----------------|-------------------|-------------| |
| 127 | | | | | | Not started / In progress / Ready | | | |
| 128 | |
| 129 | ## III. Four post types — written in full |
| 130 | ### Type 1 — Genuine question (no brand mention) |
| 131 | [Full post, 150-300 words, real person's voice] |
| 132 | |
| 133 | ### Type 2 — Expertise share (affiliation stated up front) |
| 134 | [Full post — real insight, specific, not an advertisement] |
| 135 | |
| 136 | ### Type 3 — Answering an existing thread (connection disclosed inline) |
| 137 | [Full reply — answers the question first, mentions the product only if it is the honest answer] |
| 138 | |
| 139 | ### Type 4 — Customer story amplification (customer-authored, permission on file) |
| 140 | [The customer's own words + where permission is recorded] |
| 141 | |
| 142 | ## IV. Response scripts |
| 143 | | Likely question | Honest prepared answer | Who answers | |
| 144 | |-----------------|------------------------|-------------| |
| 145 | | | | | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | ## V. Participation calendar |
| 148 | | Date | Community | Post type | Participant | Summary | Target engagement | |
| 149 | |------|-----------|-----------|-------------|---------|-------------------| |
| 150 | | | | | | | | |
| 151 | |
| 152 | ## VI. Measurement |
| 153 | | Post | Community | Engagement | DMs | Leads | Removed / warned | Notes | |
| 154 | |------|-----------|------------|-----|-------|------------------|-------| |
| 155 | | | | | | | | | |
| 156 | |
| 157 | ## VII. Compliance log |
| 158 | | Post | Disclosure used | Rule checked | Approver | |
| 159 | |------|-----------------|--------------|----------| |
| 160 | | | | | | |
| 161 | |
| 162 | |
| 163 | ## Red lines — never do these |
| 164 | |
| 165 | **Never** create or use a persona, sockpuppet, or second account. One real person, one account. |
| 166 | **Never** write a review, testimonial, or "just a happy customer" post on behalf of a customer. |
| 167 | **Never** ask colleagues to upvote, like, or reply to make a post look organic. That is vote manipulation on Reddit and coordinated inauthentic behavior on Meta. |
| 168 | **Never** omit the material-connection disclosure when a participant is an employee, contractor, affiliate, or equity holder. |
| 169 | **Never** post an identical block of text across multiple communities. Spam filters and members both notice. |
| 170 | **Never** drop a product link in the first post to a community, or in any community whose rules forbid links. |
| 171 | **Never** cold-DM members who have not asked to be contacted. |
| 172 | **Never** argue with moderators. If a post is removed, read the rule, adjust, and move on. |
| 173 | |
| 174 | Risks to manage: post removal or account ban (lost warm-up time — prevent by following rules); public exposure as astroturfing (severe brand damage — prevent by never doing it, and by answering affiliation questions honestly); community rule changes (re-read rules monthly); FTC enforcement on undisclosed endorsements and fake reviews (prevent with the compliance log in section VII). |
| 175 | |
| 176 | ## Related skills |
| 177 | |
| 178 | `09-customer-insight-global`: identifies which communities the ICP actually uses and supplies their real language. |
| 179 | `15-social-listening-global`: tells you what the community is already discussing, so the angle fits an active conversation. |
| 180 | `35-brand-voice-global`: types 2 and 3 still have to match the brand's core message, even written in a personal register. |
| 181 | `06-ugc-egc-brief-global`: the paid alternative — working with creators and community members through a disclosed paid arrangement. |
| 182 | `37-social-caption-global`: owned-channel posts, which follow different rules from community posts. |
| 183 | `39-content-audit-global`: feed community results into the periodic audit to decide which communities to keep. |
| 184 | |
| 185 | ## Quality checklist |
| 186 | |
| 187 | Every community's self-promotion rule is quoted verbatim, not summarized from memory. |
| 188 | Every participant is a real, named person with one account and a stated affiliation. |
| 189 | Warm-up of at least two weeks completed before any promotional participation. |
| 190 | All 4 post types written in full — no outlines. |
| 191 | Posts read as a person wrote them, not a brand page. |
| 192 | No brand-authored customer reviews anywhere in the plan. |
| 193 | Material connection disclosed in every post where one exists, in the post itself. |
| 194 | Value-to-promotion ratio across the calendar is at least 9:1. |
| 195 | Cadence respects each community's rules and does not repeat identical text. |
| 196 | Measurement defined per post (UTM where permitted, source field, DM attribution). |
| 197 | Removal and ban log in place. |
| 198 | No red line is crossed anywhere in the plan. |
| 199 |
Discussion
Alternatives
Browse more free Claude skills or everything in Marketing.