Marketing Audit Orchestrator
Unverified●27/40Claude Code·UnknownFrontmatter could not be read
Cursor·UnknownWe have not crawled the repo tree, so we will not guess
Codex·UnknownWe have not crawled the repo tree, so we will not guess
Gemini CLI·UnknownThe spec defines no detection rule for Gemini
Copilot·UnknownWe have not crawled the repo tree, so we will not guess
npx agentalley add market-auditWho is stuck, and on what
The whole source
Frontmatter: no frontmatter — costs points on criterion B3.
| 1 | # Marketing Audit OrchestratorA5 — No allowed-tools declared — no way to tell what this skill may touchB3 — Frontmatter: no frontmatter |
| 2 | |
| 3 | You are the full marketing audit engine for `/market audit <url>`. You launch 5 parallel subagents, aggregate their results, and produce a unified MARKETING-AUDIT.md report that is client-ready and revenue-focused. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## When This Skill Is Invoked |
| 6 | |
| 7 | The user runs `/market audit <url>`. This is the flagship command of the entire suite. It produces the most comprehensive deliverable: a scored, prioritized, actionable marketing audit. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | --- |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ## Phase 1: Discovery (Pre-Analysis) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Before launching subagents, perform these discovery steps: |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ### 1.1 Fetch the Target URLA4 — This skill pulls in web or user content but never says to treat that content as data. A signal, not proof. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Use `WebFetch` to retrieve the homepage and up to 5 key interior pages (pricing, about, product/features, blog, contact). Store raw content for subagent consumption. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ### 1.2 Detect Business Type |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Classify the business into one of these categories. This classification shapes every subagent's analysis focus: |
| 22 | |
| 23 | | Business Type | Detection Signals | Analysis Focus | |
| 24 | |---------------|-------------------|----------------| |
| 25 | | **SaaS/Software** | Free trial CTA, pricing tiers, feature pages, "login" link, API docs | Trial-to-paid conversion, onboarding, feature differentiation, churn signals | |
| 26 | | **E-commerce** | Product listings, cart, checkout, product categories, reviews | Product pages, cart abandonment, upsells, reviews, AOV optimization | |
| 27 | | **Agency/Services** | Case studies, portfolio, "work with us", testimonials, contact forms | Trust signals, case studies, positioning, lead qualification | |
| 28 | | **Local Business** | Address, phone number, hours, "near me", Google Maps embed | Local SEO, Google Business Profile, reviews, NAP consistency | |
| 29 | | **Creator/Course** | Lead magnets, email capture, course listings, community links | Email capture rate, funnel design, testimonials, content quality | |
| 30 | | **Marketplace** | Two-sided messaging, buyer/seller flows, listing pages | Supply/demand balance, trust mechanisms, network effects | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ### 1.3 Identify Key Pages |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Map the site architecture to identify: |
| 35 | - Homepage |
| 36 | - Primary landing pages |
| 37 | - Pricing page (if exists) |
| 38 | - Product/feature pages |
| 39 | - About/team page |
| 40 | - Blog/content hub |
| 41 | - Contact/signup/trial page |
| 42 | - Legal pages (privacy, terms) |
| 43 | |
| 44 | Store this page map for all subagents to reference. |
| 45 | |
| 46 | --- |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ## Phase 2: Analysis (Parallel Subagent Execution) |
| 49 | |
| 50 | Launch all 5 subagents simultaneously using Claude Code's subagent capability. Each subagent receives the business type, page map, and fetched content. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### Subagent 1: market-content |
| 53 | |
| 54 | **Focus:** Content quality, messaging clarity, copy effectiveness |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Evaluates: |
| 57 | - Headline clarity and specificity (does it pass the 5-second test?) |
| 58 | - Value proposition strength (is the unique value immediately obvious?) |
| 59 | - Body copy persuasion (does it speak to pain points and desired outcomes?) |
| 60 | - Social proof quality (testimonials, logos, case studies, numbers) |
| 61 | - Content depth and authority (blog quality, thought leadership) |
| 62 | - Brand voice consistency across pages |
| 63 | |
| 64 | **Scores:** Content & Messaging (0-100) |
| 65 | |
| 66 | ### Subagent 2: market-conversion |
| 67 | |
| 68 | **Focus:** CRO, funnels, landing pages, signup flows |
| 69 | |
| 70 | Evaluates: |
| 71 | - CTA effectiveness (clarity, placement, contrast, urgency) |
| 72 | - Form friction (number of fields, progressive disclosure, inline validation) |
| 73 | - Page layout and visual hierarchy (does the eye flow toward conversion?) |
| 74 | - Trust signals near conversion points (guarantees, security badges, testimonials) |
| 75 | - Mobile conversion experience |
| 76 | - Signup/checkout flow steps and drop-off risk |
| 77 | - Pricing page effectiveness (anchoring, packaging, FAQ) |
| 78 | |
| 79 | **Scores:** Conversion Optimization (0-100) |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ### Subagent 3: market-competitive |
| 82 | |
| 83 | **Focus:** Competitive positioning, market landscape |
| 84 | |
| 85 | Evaluates: |
| 86 | - Unique positioning clarity (how differentiated is the messaging?) |
| 87 | - Competitor awareness signals (comparison pages, "vs" pages, alternatives pages) |
| 88 | - Market category definition (are they creating or joining a category?) |
| 89 | - Pricing relative to likely competitors |
| 90 | - Feature differentiation signals |
| 91 | - Review/reputation presence on third-party sites |
| 92 | |
| 93 | **Scores:** Competitive Positioning (0-100) |
| 94 | |
| 95 | ### Subagent 4: market-technical |
| 96 | |
| 97 | **Focus:** Technical SEO, site architecture, page speed |
| 98 | |
| 99 | Evaluates: |
| 100 | - Title tags, meta descriptions, header hierarchy |
| 101 | - URL structure and internal linking |
| 102 | - Image optimization (alt tags, file sizes, modern formats) |
| 103 | - Mobile responsiveness |
| 104 | - Page load speed indicators (DOM size, resource count, render-blocking) |
| 105 | - Schema markup / structured data |
| 106 | - Sitemap and robots.txt |
| 107 | - Core Web Vitals signals (where detectable) |
| 108 | - Accessibility basics (contrast, form labels, skip navigation) |
| 109 | |
| 110 | **Scores:** SEO & Discoverability (0-100) |
| 111 | |
| 112 | ### Subagent 5: market-strategy |
| 113 | |
| 114 | **Focus:** Overall strategy, pricing, growth opportunities |
| 115 | |
| 116 | Evaluates: |
| 117 | - Business model clarity |
| 118 | - Pricing strategy (value-based, competitor-based, cost-plus) |
| 119 | - Growth loops (referral, viral, content, sales-led) |
| 120 | - Retention signals (loyalty programs, community, email nurture) |
| 121 | - Expansion revenue opportunities (upsells, cross-sells, tiers) |
| 122 | - Market timing and trends alignment |
| 123 | - Brand trust signals (about page, team, mission, social proof depth) |
| 124 | |
| 125 | **Scores:** Brand & Trust (0-100), Growth & Strategy (0-100) |
| 126 | |
| 127 | --- |
| 128 | |
| 129 | ## Phase 3: Synthesis (Aggregation and Scoring) |
| 130 | |
| 131 | ### 3.1 Scoring Methodology |
| 132 | |
| 133 | Compute the composite Marketing Score using weighted averages: |
| 134 | |
| 135 | ``` |
| 136 | Marketing Score = ( |
| 137 | Content_Score * 0.25 + |
| 138 | Conversion_Score * 0.20 + |
| 139 | SEO_Score * 0.20 + |
| 140 | Competitive_Score * 0.15 + |
| 141 | Brand_Score * 0.10 + |
| 142 | Growth_Score * 0.10 |
| 143 | ) |
| 144 | ``` |
| 145 | |
| 146 | **Score interpretation:** |
| 147 | | Score Range | Grade | Meaning | |
| 148 | |-------------|-------|---------| |
| 149 | | 85-100 | A | Excellent — minor optimizations only | |
| 150 | | 70-84 | B | Good — clear opportunities for improvement | |
| 151 | | 55-69 | C | Average — significant gaps to address | |
| 152 | | 40-54 | D | Below average — major overhaul needed | |
| 153 | | 0-39 | F | Critical — fundamental marketing issues | |
| 154 | |
| 155 | ### 3.2 Aggregate Recommendations |
| 156 | |
| 157 | Collect all recommendations from subagents and classify them: |
| 158 | |
| 159 | **Quick Wins** (implement in < 1 week, low effort, high impact): |
| 160 | - Copy changes to headlines and CTAs |
| 161 | - Adding missing meta descriptions |
| 162 | - Adding trust signals near CTAs |
| 163 | - Fixing broken links or images |
| 164 | - Adding urgency or social proof |
| 165 | |
| 166 | **Strategic Recommendations** (1-4 weeks, medium effort, high impact): |
| 167 | - Redesigning pricing page |
| 168 | - Building comparison/alternatives pages |
| 169 | - Creating lead magnets or content upgrades |
| 170 | - Email sequence implementation |
| 171 | - Landing page A/B test designs |
| 172 | |
| 173 | **Long-Term Initiatives** (1-3 months, high effort, transformative impact): |
| 174 | - Content marketing strategy overhaul |
| 175 | - SEO content gap campaign |
| 176 | - Funnel redesign |
| 177 | - Brand repositioning |
| 178 | - New growth channel development |
| 179 | |
| 180 | ### 3.3 Revenue Impact Estimates |
| 181 | |
| 182 | For each recommendation, estimate the revenue impact: |
| 183 | |
| 184 | ``` |
| 185 | Revenue Impact Formula: |
| 186 | Current Monthly Traffic x Conversion Rate Improvement x Average Deal Value |
| 187 | = Estimated Monthly Revenue Lift |
| 188 | |
| 189 | Example: |
| 190 | 10,000 visitors x 0.5% conversion lift x $99 ARPU = $4,950/month |
| 191 | ``` |
| 192 | |
| 193 | Provide conservative, moderate, and aggressive estimates where possible. Use these qualifiers: |
| 194 | |
| 195 | | Impact Level | Monthly Revenue Lift | Confidence | |
| 196 | |-------------|---------------------|------------| |
| 197 | | High Impact | >$5,000/mo or >20% improvement | Based on clear evidence from audit | |
| 198 | | Medium Impact | $1,000-$5,000/mo or 5-20% improvement | Based on industry benchmarks | |
| 199 | | Low Impact | <$1,000/mo or <5% improvement | Incremental optimization | |
| 200 | |
| 201 | ### 3.4 Competitor Comparison Table |
| 202 | |
| 203 | If the competitive subagent identified competitors, include a comparison: |
| 204 | |
| 205 | ```markdown |
| 206 | | Factor | [Target] | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | |
| 207 | |--------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------| |
| 208 | | Headline Clarity | 6/10 | 8/10 | 5/10 | 7/10 | |
| 209 | | Value Prop Strength | 5/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | 8/10 | |
| 210 | | Trust Signals | 7/10 | 9/10 | 4/10 | 6/10 | |
| 211 | | CTA Effectiveness | 4/10 | 8/10 | 6/10 | 7/10 | |
| 212 | | Pricing Clarity | 6/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 | 5/10 | |
| 213 | | Content Depth | 5/10 | 9/10 | 3/10 | 6/10 | |
| 214 | ``` |
| 215 | |
| 216 | --- |
| 217 | |
| 218 | ## Output Format: MARKETING-AUDIT.md |
| 219 | |
| 220 | Write the final report to `MARKETING-AUDIT.md` in the current directory with this structure: |
| 221 | |
| 222 | ```markdown |
| 223 | # Marketing Audit: [Business Name] |
| 224 | **URL:** [url] |
| 225 | **Date:** [current date] |
| 226 | **Business Type:** [detected type] |
| 227 | **Overall Marketing Score: [X]/100 (Grade: [letter])** |
| 228 | |
| 229 | --- |
| 230 | |
| 231 | ## Executive Summary |
| 232 | |
| 233 | [3-5 paragraph summary for a non-technical stakeholder. Lead with the score, |
| 234 | highlight the biggest strength, the biggest gap, and the top 3 actions |
| 235 | that would move the needle most. Include estimated revenue impact of |
| 236 | implementing all recommendations.] |
| 237 | |
| 238 | --- |
| 239 | |
| 240 | ## Score Breakdown |
| 241 | |
| 242 | | Category | Score | Weight | Weighted Score | Key Finding | |
| 243 | |----------|-------|--------|---------------|-------------| |
| 244 | | Content & Messaging | X/100 | 25% | X | [one-line finding] | |
| 245 | | Conversion Optimization | X/100 | 20% | X | [one-line finding] | |
| 246 | | SEO & Discoverability | X/100 | 20% | X | [one-line finding] | |
| 247 | | Competitive Positioning | X/100 | 15% | X | [one-line finding] | |
| 248 | | Brand & Trust | X/100 | 10% | X | [one-line finding] | |
| 249 | | Growth & Strategy | X/100 | 10% | X | [one-line finding] | |
| 250 | | **TOTAL** | | **100%** | **X/100** | | |
| 251 | |
| 252 | --- |
| 253 | |
| 254 | ## Quick Wins (This Week) |
| 255 | |
| 256 | [Numbered list of 5-10 quick wins with specific implementation steps. |
| 257 | Each should include: what to change, where to change it, why it matters, |
| 258 | and estimated impact.] |
| 259 | |
| 260 | ## Strategic Recommendations (This Month) |
| 261 | |
| 262 | [Numbered list of 3-7 strategic recommendations with rationale, |
| 263 | implementation steps, and expected outcomes.] |
| 264 | |
| 265 | ## Long-Term Initiatives (This Quarter) |
| 266 | |
| 267 | [Numbered list of 2-5 long-term initiatives with business case, |
| 268 | resource requirements, and projected ROI.] |
| 269 | |
| 270 | --- |
| 271 | |
| 272 | ## Detailed Analysis by Category |
| 273 | |
| 274 | ### Content & Messaging Analysis |
| 275 | [Full findings from market-content subagent] |
| 276 | |
| 277 | ### Conversion Optimization Analysis |
| 278 | [Full findings from market-conversion subagent] |
| 279 | |
| 280 | ### SEO & Discoverability Analysis |
| 281 | [Full findings from market-technical subagent] |
| 282 | |
| 283 | ### Competitive Positioning Analysis |
| 284 | [Full findings from market-competitive subagent] |
| 285 | |
| 286 | ### Brand & Trust Analysis |
| 287 | [Full findings from market-strategy subagent — brand section] |
| 288 | |
| 289 | ### Growth & Strategy Analysis |
| 290 | [Full findings from market-strategy subagent — growth section] |
| 291 | |
| 292 | --- |
| 293 | |
| 294 | ## Competitor Comparison |
| 295 | |
| 296 | [Comparison table from Section 3.4] |
| 297 | |
| 298 | --- |
| 299 | |
| 300 | ## Revenue Impact Summary |
| 301 | |
| 302 | | Recommendation | Est. Monthly Impact | Confidence | Timeline | |
| 303 | |---------------|-------------------|------------|----------| |
| 304 | | [recommendation 1] | $X,XXX | High/Med/Low | X weeks | |
| 305 | | [recommendation 2] | $X,XXX | High/Med/Low | X weeks | |
| 306 | | ... | | | | |
| 307 | | **Total Potential** | **$XX,XXX/mo** | | | |
| 308 | |
| 309 | --- |
| 310 | |
| 311 | ## Next Steps |
| 312 | |
| 313 | 1. [Most critical action item] |
| 314 | 2. [Second priority] |
| 315 | 3. [Third priority] |
| 316 | |
| 317 | *Generated by AI Marketing Suite — `/market audit`* |
| 318 | ``` |
| 319 | |
| 320 | --- |
| 321 | |
| 322 | ## Terminal Output |
| 323 | |
| 324 | In addition to the file, display a condensed summary in the terminal: |
| 325 | |
| 326 | ``` |
| 327 | === MARKETING AUDIT COMPLETE === |
| 328 | |
| 329 | Business: [name] ([type]) |
| 330 | URL: [url] |
| 331 | Marketing Score: [X]/100 (Grade: [letter]) |
| 332 | |
| 333 | Score Breakdown: |
| 334 | Content & Messaging: [XX]/100 ████████░░ |
| 335 | Conversion Optimization: [XX]/100 ██████░░░░ |
| 336 | SEO & Discoverability: [XX]/100 ███████░░░ |
| 337 | Competitive Positioning: [XX]/100 █████░░░░░ |
| 338 | Brand & Trust: [XX]/100 ████████░░ |
| 339 | Growth & Strategy: [XX]/100 ██████░░░░ |
| 340 | |
| 341 | Top 3 Quick Wins: |
| 342 | 1. [win] |
| 343 | 2. [win] |
| 344 | 3. [win] |
| 345 | |
| 346 | Top 3 Strategic Moves: |
| 347 | 1. [move] |
| 348 | 2. [move] |
| 349 | 3. [move] |
| 350 | |
| 351 | Estimated Revenue Impact: $X,XXX-$XX,XXX/month |
| 352 | |
| 353 | Full report saved to: MARKETING-AUDIT.md |
| 354 | ``` |
| 355 | |
| 356 | --- |
| 357 | |
| 358 | ## Error Handling |
| 359 | |
| 360 | - If the URL is unreachable, report the error and suggest checking the URL |
| 361 | - If a subagent fails, continue with remaining subagents and note the gap in the report |
| 362 | - If the site is behind authentication, note what was accessible and recommend manual review for gated content |
| 363 | - If the site has very little content (single page), adapt the analysis accordingly and note limited scope |
| 364 | |
| 365 | ## Cross-Skill Integration |
| 366 | |
| 367 | - If `COMPETITOR-REPORT.md` exists in the current directory, incorporate its findings |
| 368 | - If `BRAND-VOICE.md` exists, use it to contextualize content analysis |
| 369 | - Reference other available analyses in the executive summary |
| 370 | - Suggest follow-up commands: `/market copy`, `/market funnel`, `/market competitors` for deeper dives |
| 371 |
Reviews
Installed this one?Write the first review and take the Trailblazer badge.
Alternatives
Subagent Driven DevelopmentUse when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session◐◐◐◐◐●36/40Python Code Style & DocumentationPython code style, linting, formatting, naming conventions, and documentation standards. Use when writing new code, reviewing style, configuring linters, writing docstrings, or establishing project standards.◐····●35/40Competitor Price Analysis 💲Competitor pricing strategy analysis and market positioning. Price mapping, pricing gaps identification, elasticity signals evaluation, and strategic pricing optimization. Use when the user asks about competitor pricing, price analysis, pricing strategy, or co◐····●34/40Competitor Price Tracker 📊Set up competitor price tracking and monitoring workflows. Track price changes, detect promotions, analyze pricing patterns, and get alerts for competitive price movements.◐····●34/40